Association of Economic Well-Being With Comorbid Conditions in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release.

PURPOSE: Medical comorbidities have been associated with the development of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), severity at the time of presentation, and outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR). Socioeconomic factors have also been associated with worse function in patients with CTS at presentation and after surgery. However, the effects of economic well-being on the prevalence of medical comorbidities in patients with CTS have not been well-described. The objective of this study was to determine whether economic well-being is associated with medical comorbidities in a cohort of patients undergoing CTR. METHODS: Patients (n = 1,297) who underwent CTR at a single tertiary care referral center over a 5-year period from July 2008 to June 2013 were retrospectively identified. The exclusion criteria were acute trauma or infection, revision surgery, incomplete medical records, and neoplasm excision. Additionally, patients were excluded if they lacked documented confirmatory or normal electrodiagnostic study findings prior to CTR. Finally, this study comprised a cohort of 892 patients with electrodiagnostic study-confirmed CTS who underwent CTR. The economic well-being of patients was assessed using the Distressed Communities Index. The comorbidities of diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, cervical radiculopathy, tobacco use, and body mass index were assessed. Bivariate comparisons were used to determine the associations between the tiers of economic well-being and comorbidities. RESULTS: Lower economic well-being was associated with body mass index, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and tobacco use in these patients. Although hypertension, hypothyroidism, and cervical radiculopathy were not associated with economic well-being, their comparisons were underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing economic distress have a higher comorbidity burden, and as such, may be at an increased risk of complications or poorer outcomes. The association between economic well-being and comorbidities in this population suggests the need for a multidisciplinary care model that addresses both compressive neuropathy and the associated economic factors. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Evaluation of persons with suspected lumbosacral and cervical radiculopathy: Electrodiagnostic assessment and implications for treatment and outcomes (Part I).

Persons with back, neck, and limb symptoms constitute a major referral population to specialists in electrodiagnostic (EDX) medicine. The evaluation of these patients involves consideration of both the common and less common disorders. The EDX examination with needle electromyography (EMG) is the most important means of testing for radiculopathy. This test has modest sensitivity but high specificity and well complements imaging of the spine. Needle EMG in combination with nerve conduction testing is valuable in excluding entrapment neuropathies and polyneuropathy-conditions that frequently mimic radicular symptoms. In this first of a two-part review, the optimal EDX evaluation of persons with suspected radiculopathy is presented. In part two, the implications of EDX findings for diagnosis and clinical management of persons with radiculopathy are reviewed.

Correlation of the self-reported Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs score, clinical neurological examination and MR imaging in patients with lumbo-sacral radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Lumbo-sacral radiculopathy (LSR) is a common musculoskeletal disorder for which patients seek medical care and referrals for advanced imaging. However, accurate diagnosis remains challenging. Neuropathic pain screening questionnaires, clinical neurological examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used in the initial diagnosis. The utility of these tools in diagnosing LSR varies and their correlation has not been reported. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicentre, blinded design was used in six physiotherapy departments in Kenya. Each participant was blindly examined by three independent clinicians using the Self-Reported Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) score, clinical neurological examination (CNE) and MRI. Spearman's rank coefficient (r) was used to examine the correlation between the three tests. Linear regression and odds ratios were used to establish correlations between socio-demographic, clinical and diagnostic parameters. The diagnostic accuracy of individual or combined sets of CNE tests in diagnosing LSR, with reference to MRI, was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: We enrolled 102 participants (44 males, 58 females; mean age: 44.7 years). Results indicated a significant positive correlation (r = 0.36, P = 0.01) between S-LANSS, CNE and MRI among patients with low back and radiating leg symptoms. Positive agreement existed between combined neuro-conduction tests (sensory, motor and reflex) and neuro-dynamic tests (NDT). The NDT component of CNE (Straight Leg Raise Test [SLRT] and Femoral Nerve Stretch Test [FNST]) was significantly associated (P = 0.05) with MRI: patients who had positive NDT results had higher odds (8.3) for positive nerve root compromise on MRI versus those who had negative NDT results. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to investigate the correlation between S-LANSS, CNE and MRI in patients presenting with low back and radiating leg symptoms. Results indicated a significant positive correlation. The strongest correlations to MRI findings of LSR were firstly, NDT (SLRT and FNST); secondly, the S-LANSS score; and thirdly, the CNE components of motor power and deep tendon reflex. The clinical implication is that clinicians can confidently use the S-LANSS score and CNE to diagnose and make therapeutic decisions in LSR, when MRI is medically contra-indicated, unaffordable or unavailable.

Pain Provocation and the Energy Cost of Walking: A Matched Comparison Study of Older Adults With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic low back pain with radiculopathy (CLBPR) is common among older adults and can lead to walking difficulty. Energy cost of walking strongly predicts changes in walking speed, which is predictive of mortality in older adults. The purposes of this study were to examine (1) the impact of pain provocation on the energy cost of walking and (2) the relationship between pain intensity and change in energy cost of walking. METHODS: Older adults (60-85 years) with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) CLBPR were matched on age, sex, and diabetes presence/absence. Energy cost of walking was measured with a portable metabolic gas analyzer, as participants walked for 20 minutes or less. Energy cost and pain measurements occurred during early and late stages of walking. Percent change in energy cost was calculated. Participants were grouped by their pain response during walking: increased pain (n = 13); consistent pain (n = 7); no pain, matched to individuals with increased pain (n = 13); and no pain, matched to individuals with consistent pain (n = 7). We examined the within-groups change in energy cost for all groups, as well as the relationship between late-stage pain intensity and percent change of energy cost for individuals whose pain increased. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Within the increased pain group, energy cost of walking significantly increased from early to late stages (median change = 0.003 mL/kg/m, P = .006), and late-stage pain intensity explained 41.2% (p = 0.040) of the variance in percent change. Since pain appears to be linked to energy cost, effective pain management with walking may be an important factor in preventing mobility decline. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with CLBPR, pain provocation drives increases in the energy cost of walking. Because high energy cost of walking is predictive of mobility decline, clinicians may focus on effective pain management strategies during walking, which may potentially decrease the risk of mobility decline.

The Risks of Hepatitis C in Association With Cervical Spinal Surgery: Analysis of Radiculopathy and Myelopathy Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of in-hospital postsurgical complications among hepatitis C-infected patients after cervical spinal surgery in comparison with uninfected patients and determine independent risk factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studying hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a possible risk factor for cervical spine postoperative complications is prudent, given the high prevalence of cervical spondylosis and HCV in older patients. Spine literature is limited with respect to the impact of chronic HCV upon complications after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical spine surgery for cervical radiculopathy (CR) or cervical myelopathy (CM) from 2005 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Patients were divided into CR and CM groups, with comparative subgroup analysis of HCV and no-HCV patients. Univariate analysis compared demographics and complications. Binary logistic stepwise regression modeling identified any independent outcome predictors (covariates: age, sex, Deyo score, and surgical approach). RESULTS: In total, 227,310 patients (HCV: n=2542; no-HCV: n=224,764) were included. From 2005 to 2013, HCV infection prevalence among all cervical spinal fusion cases increased from 0.8% to 1.2%. HCV patients were more likely to be African American or Hispanic and have Medicare and/or Medicaid (all P<0.001). Overall complication rates among HCV patients with CR or CM increased, specifically related to device (CR: 3.1% vs. 1.9%; CM: 2.9% vs. 1.3%), hematoma/seroma (CR: 1.1% vs. 0.4%; CM: 1.8% vs. 0.8%), and sepsis (CR: 0.4% vs. 0.1%; CM: 1.1% vs. 0.5%) (all P≤0.001). Among CR and CM patients, HCV significantly predicted increased complication rates [odds ratio (OR): 1.268; OR: 1.194], hospital stay (OR: 1.738; OR: 1.861), and hospital charges (OR: 1.516; OR: 1.732; all P≤0.044). CONCLUSIONS: HCV patients undergoing cervical spinal surgery were found to have increased risks of postoperative complications and increased risk associated with surgical approach. These findings should augment preoperative risk stratification and counseling for HCV patients and their spine surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Nonoperative treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy: what factors predict treatment failure?

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of nonoperative treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy have identified potential predictors of treatment failure, defined by persistent pain, persistent disability, lack of recovery, or subsequent surgery. However, few predictors have been replicated, with the exception of higher leg pain intensity, as a predictor of subsequent surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked two research questions: (1) Does higher baseline leg pain intensity predict subsequent lumbar surgery? (2) Can other previously identified "candidate" predictors of nonoperative treatment failure be replicated? METHODS: Between January 2008 and March 2009, 154 participants with acute lumbosacral radicular pain were enrolled in a prospective database; 128 participants (83%) received nonoperative treatment and 26 (17%) received surgery over 2-year followup. Ninety-four nonoperative participants (73%) responded to followup questionnaires. We examined associations between previously identified "candidate" predictors and treatment failure defined as (1) subsequent surgery; (2) persistent leg pain on a visual analog scale; (3) persistent disability on the Oswestry Disability Index; or (4) participant-reported lack of recovery over 2-year followup. Confounding variables including sociodemographics, clinical factors, and imaging characteristics were evaluated using an exploratory bivariate analysis followed by a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: With the numbers available, higher baseline leg pain intensity was not an independent predictor of subsequent surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22 per point of baseline leg pain; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.53; p = 0.08). Prior low back pain (aOR, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.01-22.7; p = 0.05) and a positive straight leg raise test (aOR, 4.38; 95% CI, 1.60-11.9; p = 0.004) predicted subsequent surgery. Workers compensation claims predicted persistent leg pain (aOR, 9.04; 95% CI, 1.01-81; p = 0.05) and disability (aOR, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.09-32.7; p = 0.04). Female sex predicted persistent disability (aOR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.03-9.69; p = 0.05) and perceived lack of recovery (aOR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.02-5.84; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline leg pain intensity was not confirmed as a predictor of subsequent surgery. However, the directionality of the association seen was consistent with prior reports, suggesting Type II error as a possible explanation; larger studies are needed to further examine this relationship. Clinicians should be aware of potential factors that may predict nonoperative treatment failure, including prior low back pain or a positive straight leg raise test as predictors of subsequent surgery, workers compensation claims as predictors of persistent leg pain and disability, and female sex as a predictor of persistent disability and lack of recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The course and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniation with radiculopathy: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine disc herniation is a disabling source of cervical radiculopathy. However, little is known about its course and prognosis. Understanding the course and prognosis of symptomatic cervical disc herniation is necessary to guide patients' expectations and assist clinicians in managing patients. PURPOSE: To describe the natural history, clinical course, and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniations with radiculopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature and best evidence synthesis. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportsDiscus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 2013 was conducted to retrieve eligible articles. Eligible articles were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. The results from articles with low risk of bias were analyzed using best evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS: We identified 1,221 articles. Of those, eight articles were eligible and three were accepted as having a low risk of bias. Two studies pertained to course and one study pertained to prognosis. Most patients with symptomatic cervical disc herniations with radiculopathy initially present with intense pain and moderate levels of disability. However, substantial improvements tend to occur within the first 4 to 6 months post-onset. Time to complete recovery ranged from 24 to 36 months in, approximately, 83% of patients. Patients with a workers' compensation claim appeared to have a poorer prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our best evidence synthesis describes the best available evidence on the course and prognosis of cervical disc herniations with radiculopathy. Most patients with symptomatic cervical spine disc herniation with radiculopathy recover. Possible recurrences and time to complete recovery need to be further studied. More studies are also needed to understand the prognostic factors for this condition.

Assessment of hip abductor power in patients with foot drop: a simple and useful test to differentiate lumbar radiculopathy and peroneal neuropathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study on a diagnostic test. OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of hip abductor power assessment in the differential diagnosis of foot drop due to lumbar radiculopathy and peroneal neuropathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Foot drop arises from various neuromuscular conditions. Differential diagnosis obvious in the typical case, however, is often inconclusive. There are few reports regarding the validity of hip abductor power in the differential diagnosis of foot drop. METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients who presented with tibialis anterior weakness Medical Research Council grade of less than 3 were included and underwent neurological examination including the assessment of hip abductor power. Patient demographics, mechanism and pattern of foot drop, neurological findings, and the diagnoses were recorded. Final diagnoses were established on the basis of clinical information, imaging studies, and electrophysiological study in limited cases. Validity and reliability of the hip abductor power assessment in the differential diagnosis of foot drop due to lumbar radiculopathy and peroneal neuropathy were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 44 men and 17 women, with a mean age of 46.8 years (19-77 yr). The final diagnosis was peroneal neuropathy in 28 patients, lumbosacral plexopathy in 9 patients, lumbar radiculopathy in 21 patients, and sciatic nerve disorder in 3 patients. Concomitant hip abductor weakness was found in 85.7% of lumbar radiculopathy and 3.6% of peroneal neuropathy. The sensitivity and specificity of hip abductor power in the differential diagnosis of foot drop due to the lumbar radiculopathy and peroneal neuropathy were 85.7% and 96.4%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.7% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Assessment of hip abductor strength is a simple and useful method in the differential diagnosis of foot drop due to lumbar radiculopathy and peroneal neuropathy.

Epidural steroid injections.

Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is the most commonly performed intervention in pain clinics across the United States. This article provides an evidence-based review of ESI, including data on efficacy, patient selection, comparison of types, and complications. The data strongly suggest that ESI can provide short-term relief for radicular symptoms but are less compelling for long-term effects or relief of back pain. Although it has been asserted that transforaminal ESIs are more efficacious than interlaminar injections, the evidence supporting this is limited.

Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.

PURPOSE: Currently, many pre-conditions are regarded as relative or absolute contraindications for lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). Radiculopathy is one among them. In Switzerland it is left to the surgeon's discretion when to operate if he adheres to a list of pre-defined indications. Contraindications, however, are less clearly specified. We hypothesized that, the extent of pre-operative radiculopathy results in different benefits for patients treated with mono-segmental lumbar TDR. We used patient perceived leg pain and its correlation with physician recorded radiculopathy for creating the patient groups to be compared. METHODS: The present study is based on the dataset of SWISSspine, a government mandated health technology assessment registry. Between March 2005 and April 2009, 577 patients underwent either mono- or bi-segmental lumbar TDR, which was documented in a prospective observational multicenter mode. A total of 416 cases with a mono-segmental procedure were included in the study. The data collection consisted of pre-operative and follow-up data (physician based) and clinical outcomes (NASS form, EQ-5D). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted with patients' self-indicated leg pain and the surgeon-based diagnosis "radiculopathy", as marked on the case report forms. As a result, patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of leg pain. The two groups were compared with regard to the pre-operative patient characteristics and pre- and post-operative pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and quality of life using general linear modeling. RESULTS: The optimal ROC model revealed a leg pain threshold of 40 ≤ VAS > 40 for the absence or the presence of "radiculopathy". Demographics in the resulting two groups were well comparable. Applying this threshold, the mean pre-operative leg pain level was 16.5 points in group 1 and 68.1 points in group 2 (p < 0.001). Back pain levels differed less with 63.6 points in group 1 and 72.6 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Pre-operative quality of life showed considerable differences with an 0.44 EQ-5D score in group 1 and 0.29 in group 2 (p < 0.001, possible score range -0.6 to 1). At a mean follow-up time of 8 months, group 1 showed a mean leg pain improvement of 3.6 points and group 2 of 41.1 points (p < 0.001). Back pain relief was 35.6 and 39.1 points, respectively (p = 0.27). EQ-5D score improvement was 0.27 in group 1 and 0.41 in group 2 (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Patients labeled as having radiculopathy (group 2) do mostly have pre-operative leg pain levels ≥ 40. Applying this threshold, the patients with pre-operative leg pain do also have more severe back pain and a considerably lower quality of life. Their net benefit from the lumbar TDR is higher and they do have similar post-operative back and leg pain levels as well as the quality of life as patients without pre-operative leg pain. Although randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings, they put leg pain and radiculopathy into perspective as absolute contraindications for TDR.

Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma.

In this article, the epidemiology of back pain and the use of a variety of treatments for back pain in the United States are reviewed. The dilemma faced by medical providers caring for patients with low back pain is examined in the context of epidemiologic data. Back pain is becoming increasingly common and a growing number of treatment options are being used with increasing frequency in clinical practice. However, limited evidence exists to demonstrate the effectiveness of these treatments. In addition, health-related quality of life for persons with back pain is not improving despite the availability and use of an expanding array of treatments. This dilemma poses a difficult challenge for medical providers treating individual patients who suffer from back pain.

Differentiation of thoracic outlet syndrome from treatment-resistant cervical brachial pain syndromes: development and utilization of a questionnaire, clinical examination and ultrasound evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to determine which factors differentiate patients with a good outcome after treatment for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (TOS) from patients with a poor outcome. METHODS: A total of 85 patients, who were examined during one year, had at least 6 months of follow up after treatment for TOS with either surgery or botulinum chemodenervation. RESULTS: Socioeconomic factors of work disability or workers' compensation claims did not differentiate treatment-responsive TOS from treatment-resistant cases. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding the presence of anomalous anatomy detected by ultrasonography or regarding the presence of subclavian artery flow acceleration or occlusion detected by duplex sonography. Several factors were noted more frequently in treatment-resistant patients: sensory complaints extending beyond lower trunk dermatomes (42% vs. 10%), weakness extending beyond lower trunk myotomes (19% vs. 2%), histories of previous non-TOS surgery of the neck or upper limbs (50% vs.17%), comorbidities of fibromyalgia or complex regional pain syndrome (81% vs. 12%), and depression (35% vs. 10%). Treatment-resistant patients complained about more widespread functional impairments on a validated Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire (CBSQ) than treatment-responsive patients. Resistant cases responded less often to a scalene test block (38% vs. 100%), which is designed to simulate the effects of targeted treatment. CONCLUSION: In summary, compared to patients with a good outcome after targeted treatment, patients with a poor outcome had more diffuse complaints and responded less often to a scalene test block.

The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 1: the assessment of outcome.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study investigating the outcome of decompression surgery using validated measures of outcome. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcome of lumbar decompressive surgery in the initial postoperative year period in terms of function, disability, general health, and psychological well-being. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The majority of studies investigating the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery have been retrospective and have not used validated measures of outcome. This limits their interpretation and usefulness. METHODS: Eighty-four patients undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were recruited into this study. Patients were assessed by use of validated measures of outcome including the Oswestry Disability Index and the Short Form SF-36 General Health Questionnaire before surgery and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: A significant reduction in pain (P < 0.001) was observed at the 6-week postoperative stage; this did not change at the subsequent assessment stages. Only some of the SF-36 categories were sensitive to change. The subcategories that were sensitive to change were physical function (P < 0.05), bodily pain (P < 0.001), and social function (P < 0.05). Improvements were observed in these categories at the 6-week and 6-month reviews. A gradual reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index was observed with time, with changes principally being observed between the 6-week and 6-month review and the 6-week and 1-year review stages (P < 0.05). Minimal changes were observed in the psychological assessments with time. The outcome of surgery could not be predicted reliably from psychological, functional, or pain measures. CONCLUSIONS: The visual analogue pain scales, the Oswestry Disability Index, and certain categories of the SF-36 Questionnaire, namely bodily pain and physical and social function, appeared to be the most sensitive outcome measures, with significant improvements occurring at the 6-week and 6-month reviews.