A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial tested hypotheses that there are no differences in patient satisfaction, component costs, or treatment and maintenance times when mandibular overdentures are retained by one or two implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects wearing conventional complete dentures were randomized to receive either one midline or two bilateral mandibular implants followed by a mandibular denture reline to incorporate implant retention. They indicated on a visual analog scale satisfaction with their dentures before implants and at 2 months and 1 year after implant retention. Satisfaction outcomes between the two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon/Mann-Whitney nonparametric rank test, while changes within each group were analyzed using signed-rank tests. Component costs and times for surgery, prosthodontic treatment, and maintenance were compared using nonparametric and t tests. RESULTS: Eighty-six subjects enrolled in this study and 85 completed the 1-year follow-up, at which median satisfaction was 93 (maximum 100) in the single-implant group and 94 in the two-implant group (P > .5). Within each group, median improvement in satisfaction was similarly dramatic (approximately 44) and significant (P < .001). Prosthodontic maintenance time was similar for both groups (P > .37), but the single-implant group had significantly lower component costs (P < .001) and lower times for surgery (P = .002), postsurgical denture maintenance (P = .021), and denture reline (P < .001). Five implants failed in four subjects, all in the two-implant group and all before denture reline. CONCLUSION: Lower component costs and treatment times, with comparable satisfaction and maintenance time over the first year, indicate that a mandibular overdenture retained by a single midline implant may be an alternative to the customary two-implant overdenture for maladaptive denture patients.

The cost of dental implants as compared to that of conventional strategies.

The effectiveness of dental implants is widely studied, especially in terms of their clinical outcomes. However, from the policymaker's point of view, variables other than safety and efficacy, such as the costs and effectiveness of dental implants as compared to other treatment alternatives, are vital in decision making. This paper compares the costs of different treatment strategies in a randomized clinical trial in patients with resorbed mandibles and persistent problems with their conventional dentures: treatment with a mandibular overdenture on permucosal dental implants, an overdenture on a transmandibular implant, new dentures after preprosthetic surgery, and new dentures only. Data were gathered on an individual patient level to gain insight into specific cost episodes. Direct costs were subdivided into labor, material, technique, and overhead. Data concerning these components were gathered during the consecutive treatment phases in the first year. Results show that the resources used to treat a patient with an overdenture supported by a transmandibular implant are seven times those of a complete new set of dentures. Comparison of the cost ratio of an implant-retained overdenture supported by permucosal implants and conventional new prostheses proves less unfavorable: 1:3. New dentures after preprosthetic surgery are almost as expensive as treatment with permucosal implants.