Improving Patient Safety in Medication Management by Medication Reconciliation and Pharmaceutical Care Process in Post-Liver Transplant Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplant recipients receive many medications for anti-rejection, infection prophylaxis, and treatment of comorbidities. Most of them also receive medications from multiple sources. Therefore, these patients are prone to drug-related problems (DRPs) and medication errors. This study aimed to study the effect of medication reconciliation (MR) and pharmaceutical care processes by transplant pharmacists in the post-liver transplant clinic. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study in Siriraj Liver Transplant Center, Mahidol University, Thailand. Patients who received pharmaceutical care from transplant pharmacists were compared before and after the implementation of MR (October 2020-September 2021 vs October 2021-September 2022) to assess the prevalence of medication errors and identify DRPs between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Before implementation of MR, in a total of 797 visits, 69 medication errors (8.7%) were found. The most errors were medication omissions (44.9%, n = 31). After the implementation of MR, in a total of 879 visits, 44 medication errors (5.0%) were found. Most were medication omission and incorrect strength (31.8%, n = 14). Medication errors significantly decreased by 36.2% (P < .001) after the implementation of MR. Regarding DRPs, transplant pharmacists could significantly detect more DRPs after implementation of MR, 66 DRPs before implementation of MR vs 111 DRPs after implementation of MR (P < .001). The most DRPs were non-adherence (34 vs 41). CONCLUSIONS: MR can reduce medication errors and assist transplant pharmacists in identifying DRPs that will lead to active intervention by attending physicians and/or patients to improve medication management and patient safety in post-liver transplant care.

Simulating Telemedicine, Medication Reconciliation, and Social Determinants: A Novel Instructional Approach to Health Systems Competencies.

While medication reconciliation is necessary to reduce errors, it is often challenging to gather an accurate history in the clinic. Telemedicine offers a relative advantage over clinic and hospital-based interviews by enabling the clinician to inspect the home environment, review pill bottles, and identify social determinants affecting adherence, such as financial instability. To be effective, however, clinicians must be trained in best-practice interview methods and the proper use of telemedicine. There is very little information in the literature describing the best strategies for teaching students or measuring competencies in telemedicine. Therefore, we created an educational module with a telemedicine simulation and an evaluation rubric. We piloted this module with 48 medical and physician assistant students. Most students could complete a virtual interview and gather a medication history. However, only half identified an over-the-counter medication missing from the list. Most students were either entrustable or approaching entrustment in the six telemedicine competencies measured in this simulation. This simulation is valuable for teaching students about medication reconciliation, using telemedicine to close gaps in access to care, and identifying health-related social needs affecting medication adherence.

Assessment of medication discrepancy, medication appropriateness, and cost analysis among patients with pediatric nephrotic syndrome: An ambispective cohort observational study.

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a commonly encountered chronic kidney disease in pediatric populations, with South Asian children being at high risk and requiring long-term pharmacological management. Thus, identifying medication discrepancies and evaluating the appropriateness of therapy and its economic burden are vital for inpatient management. The aim of the study was to assess medication reconciliation, medication appropriateness, and cost analysis in NS cases. METHODS: An ambispective cohort observational study was carried out with 150 NS patients where medication discrepancies were identified retrospectively and prospectively using the best possible medication history and following up patients correspondingly. Further, the Medication Appropriateness Index and cost variation analysis were used to assess the prescribed therapy and cost analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Out of 150 patients with NS included, 67.3% were male and the mean age was 7.2 years. In total, 36.7% medication discrepancies were found at baseline and 6% discrepancies at follow-up. The majority of discrepancies were unintentional and due to dosing error both at baseline and follow-up. Further, in only 2% of the patients was there inappropriately prescribed medication, and the majority of patients spent between INR (Indian Rupees) 500 and 1000. CONCLUSION: Chronic conditions like NS require continuous monitoring by the specialist pediatric clinical pharmacist, who can contribute significantly by minimizing the medication discrepancies, by assessing the appropriateness of therapy, and lessening the economic burden.

Clinical impact and cost-saving analysis of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention in older patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hospital admission and discharge are at high risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) in older patients with cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical and economic impact of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention (RECAP) to optimize drug therapy in patients with cancer ≥75 years admitted to oncology or geriatric wards. METHOD: RECAP intervention was defined as follows: at admission and discharge, hospital pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reconciliation and review, identified relevant DRPs and provided optimization recommendations to prescribers; at discharge, pharmacists also provided patient education and shared information with primary care providers. The impact of the intervention was assessed by the rate of implementation of recommendations by the prescribers and the evolution of polypharmacy rate; a peer review of the clinical significance of DRPs was performed by an expert panel of geriatric oncologists and pharmacists. A cost saving analysis compared cost avoided through resolution of DRPs to cost of pharmacist's time. RESULTS: From January 2019 and August 2020, 201 patients were included (median age 80 [75-97] years), 68.7% with solid tumors. DRPs requiring optimization were identified in 70.9% of patients at admission (mean 1.7 DRP/patient) and 47.7% at discharge (0.9 DRP/patient). Most pharmacist recommendations (70.8%) were followed by prescribers, allowing the correction of 1.2 DRP/patient at admission and 0.7 DRP/patient at discharge. Half of resolved DRPs were rated as clinically significant. However, polypharmacy rate was not reduced at discharge. Cost comparison showed $7.2 avoided for $1 invested, with an estimated total net benefit of $354,822 (mean $1766 per patient). CONCLUSIONS: The RECAP model significantly reduces DRPs in hospitalized older patients with cancer. The model was cost saving, confirming the value of implementing it in routine practice.

Prevented harm and cost avoidance with pharmacist intervention while utilizing a discharge medication reconciliation tool.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine prevented harm and cost avoidance following pharmacist intervention utilizing a discharge medication reconciliation tool. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients with pharmacist-initiated, provider-accepted discharge medication reconciliation interventions completed at a community teaching hospital in January 2021. Investigators assigned the discrepancies targeted for intervention a National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) category, probability of harm, and calculated cost avoidance. The primary endpoint was the total cost avoidance associated with discharge medication reconciliation. RESULTS: Pharmacists intervened 190 times in January 2021, avoiding an estimated $46,958 to $231,032 in cost. High-risk medications were associated with $33,920 to $147,203 in cost avoidance. The 3 high-risk therapeutic classes associated with the highest cost avoidance were insulin ($16,738-$70,793), antithrombotics ($13,884-$60,016), and opioids ($2,638-$11,834). CONCLUSION: Targeted pharmacist discharge medication reconciliation and related interventions avoid significant cost and patient harm.

Clinical and economic effectiveness of a pharmacy and primary care collaborative transition of care program.

BACKGROUND: Primary care pharmacists are uniquely positioned to improve care quality by intervening within care transitions in the postdischarge period. However, additional evidence is required to demonstrate that pharmacist-led interventions can reduce health care utilization in a cost-effective manner. The study's objective was to evaluate the clinical and economic effectiveness of a pharmacy-led transition of care (TOC) program within a primary care setting. METHODS: This cluster randomized trial was conducted between 2019 and 2021 and included three primary care practices. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and at high risk of readmission. The multifaceted pharmacy intervention included medication reconciliation, comprehensive medication review, and patient and provider follow-up. The primary composite endpoint included hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of discharge. Differences in outcomes were modeled using a generalized estimated equations approach and outcomes were assumed to be distributed as a Poisson random variable. A cost-benefit analysis was embedded within the study and estimated economic outcomes from a provider group/health system perspective. Cost measures included: net benefit, benefit to cost ratio (BCR), and return on investment (ROI). RESULTS: Of 300 eligible patients, 36 were in the intervention group and 264 in the control group. The intervention significantly reduced the primary composite outcome of all-cause readmissions and ED visits within 30 days (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.66; P < 0.001). There were significant reductions in both 30-day all-cause readmissions (aIRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67; P < 0.001) and ED visits (aIRR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.31; P < 0.001) between groups. The net benefit of the intervention was $9,078, with a BCR of 2.11 and a ROI of 111%. Sensitivity analyses were robust to changes in economic inputs. CONCLUSION: This care transition program had positive clinical and economic benefits, providing further support for the essential role pharmacists demonstrate in providing TOC services.

Impact of a pharmacist collaborative drug therapy management protocol on utilization of a discharge prescription program and hospital readmissions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreement allowing a pharmacist to automatically prescribe refills of discharge medications to patients' preferred outpatient pharmacy on utilization of a hospital discharge prescription program and hospital readmission rates. METHODS: This was a single-center, quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study. Patients aged 18 years or older discharged from the cardiology services to home were eligible for inclusion in the study. The CDTM agreement was initiated on July 1, 2019. Patients discharged to home from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, were assigned to the historical control group. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who used the bedside medication delivery service at hospital discharge between the groups. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospital readmissions and a descriptive analysis of medications prescribed by a pharmacist through the program. A χ2 test was used to assess the primary outcome, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess hospital readmissions. RESULTS: In total, 1,704 and 2,200 patients were discharged in the control and CDTM groups, respectively. The CDTM group had a greater proportion of patients who participated in the discharge prescription program compared to the historical control group (77.8% vs 68.7%; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day hospital readmission rate between the groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.23; P = 0.94). CONCLUSION: A CDTM protocol to improve the availability of medication refills at a patient's regular outpatient pharmacy improved utilization of a bedside medication delivery service but did not change 30-day readmission rates.

Improving Safety During Transitions of Care Through the Use of Electronic Referral Loops to Receive and Reconcile Health Information.

BACKGROUND: Medicare's Promoting Interoperability Program evaluates how often organizations completely reconcile differences between the internal medical record with problems, medications, and allergies received from outside electronic health records (EHRs) during hospitalizations. This quality improvement project sought to increase rates of complete reconciliation of patient problems, medications, and allergies to 80% of hospitalizations for 90 consecutive days at all eight hospitals in an academic medical system by December 31, 2021. METHODS: Baseline characteristics were determined using monthly reconciliation performance from October 2019 to October 2020. The intervention period occurred from November 2020 to December 2021 and consisted of 26 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Performance was monitored from January 2022 to June 2022 to observe the sustainability of the initiative. Statistical process control charts were used to identify special cause variation in system-level performance. RESULTS: All eight hospitals successfully recorded 90 consecutive days of complete reconciliation above 80% in 2021, and seven of eight hospitals maintained this goal in the sustainability period. Average baseline reconciliation was 22.1%. System-level performance satisfied criteria for baseline shift after PDSA 17, when the average performance was recalculated as 52.4%. Criteria for a second baseline shift were satisfied during the sustainability period, when the average performance was recalculated at 79.9%. Overall performance has remained within the recalculated control limits throughout the sustainability period. CONCLUSION: An intervention that included enhancing EHR workflows, training medical providers, and communicating division performance was successful in increasing and sustaining complete reconciliation of clinical information in a multihospital medical system.

Effect of the population health inpatient Medicare Advantage pharmacist intervention on hospital readmissions: A quasi-experimental controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The population health inpatient Medicare Advantage pharmacist (PHIMAP) intervention is a pharmacist-led, transitions-of-care intervention that aims to reduce hospital readmissions among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. PHIMAP includes inpatient pharmacist participation in interdisciplinary rounds, admission and discharge medication reconciliation, pharmacy staff delivery of discharge medications to the bedside, personalized discharge medication lists and counseling, and communication with outpatient pharmacists through an electronic health record. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the PHIMAP intervention on unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions among Medicare Advantage patients. METHODS: Those included were patients admitted to a large urban academic medical center between May 2018 and March 2020 who had a Medicare Advantage plan and were aged at least 18 years. A 2-group, quasi-experimental design was utilized. Control patients received the usual care, which included a best possible medication history and a postdischarge phone call. A multivariable logistic regression model was estimated to predict unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions. This study was a Hypothesis Evaluating Treatment Effectiveness study. RESULTS: In total, 884 patients were included. The majority were White (59.0%), non-Hispanic (87.7%), English speaking (90.5%), and older adults (median age, 75 years; interquartile range, 70-83 years). We detected no statistically significant association between the PHIMAP intervention and unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.56-1.52). After adjusting for patient demographics and clinical covariates, significant predictors of 30-day readmissions included the number of emergency department/inpatient visits within 180 days prior to index admission (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.11-1.77); discharge to a post-acute care facility, such as an inpatient rehabilitation facility, long-term acute care facility, or skilled nursing facility (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.06-2.66); hospital length of stay in days (OR = 1.04, 95% CI=1.01-1.07); and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Significant predictors of readmissions among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were consistent with greater illness severity, including a recent history of prior hospital utilization, a discharge to post-acute care facility (vs home), a longer length of hospital stay, and a higher comorbidity burden. Although we detected no statistically significant association between PHIMAP and unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions, differences in study group assignment based on the day of hospital discharge (weekend vs weekday) was a noted limitation of this study. Future studies of inpatient pharmacist-led interventions should plan to minimize the risk of selection bias due to differences in the time of patient discharge. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging under award number R01AG058911 (to Pevnick) and the UCLA Clinical Translational Science Institute (UL1 TR001881). The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study, nor the writing of this report.

Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions on multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Optimizing medication use is a major issue in older patients with cancer and pharmacists are increasingly involved in their multidisciplinary care. The implementation of pharmaceutical care interventions must be supported by impact evaluations to enable their development and funding. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in older patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for articles reporting evaluations of pharmaceutical care interventions for patients with cancer aged 65 years or older. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the selection criteria. Most pharmacists were part of multidisciplinary geriatric oncology teams. Whether in outpatient or inpatient settings, interventions had common components, including patient interview, medication reconciliation, and comprehensive medication review to assess drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs were identified in 95% of patients with 1.7 to 3 DRPs on average. Pharmacist recommendations resulted in a 20-40% reduction in the total number of DRPs and a 20-25% decrease in the prevalence of DRP. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate or omitted medications and their subsequent deprescribing or addition varied greatly between studies, notably depending on detection tools used. Clinical impact was insufficiently evaluated. Only one study reported a reduction of anticancer treatment toxicities following a joint pharmaceutical and geriatric assessment. A single economic evaluation calculated a potential net benefit of $3,864.23 per patient resulting from the intervention. DISCUSSION: These encouraging results must be confirmed by more robust evaluations to support the involvement of pharmacists in multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of medication reconciliation performed by a pharmacist in pediatrics of a hospital: A randomized clinical trial protocol linked to a pharmacoeconomic study.

INTRODUCTION: Each patient admitted to the hospital is subject to one medication error per day, since the occurrence of this one with the potential to cause harm is three times more common in pediatric hospitalized patients than in adults. These harms can result from inaccurate or incomplete drug use histories when patients undergo a clinical evaluation, which jeopardizes patient safety and compromises hospitalization costs. Thus, medication reconciliation (MC) emerges as a possible solution to avoid the occurrence of these in pediatric patients and directly contributes to reducing costs in the hospital environment and increasing quality of life). Therefore, this study proposes to determine whether pharmacist-led medication reconciliation is a cost-effective strategy to improve health outcomes in pediatric patients. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial will be carried out, over eight months, to carry out the cost analysis. Micro-costing pharmacoeconomic model through a questionnaire and clinical interview to collect the variables necessary for the study and comparison of the control and intervention groups. Participants in this study will be children aged 0 days to 12 years, admitted to the hospital. The perspective adopted will be that of the hospital. To assess the economic outcomes of MC, the cost-effect pairs will be categorized and visually represented in the cost-effectiveness plan to compare the intervention and control groups. Monte Carlo simulation and univariate sensitivity analysis will be performed to test the robustness of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The clinical trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe (CAAE: 19625319.6.0000.5546 and opinion number: 3,630,579). This protocol fully adhered to the recommendations of the 2010 CONSORT Declaration and was registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-25dnqsk.

Participatory research to improve medication reconciliation for older adults in the community.

INTRODUCTION: Medication reconciliation, a technique that assists in aligning a care team's understanding of an individual's true medication regimen, is vital to optimize medication use and prevent medication errors. Historically, most medication reconciliation research has focused on institutional settings and transitional care, with comparatively little attention given to medication reconciliation in community settings. To optimize medication reconciliation for community-dwelling older adults, healthcare professionals and older adults must be engaged in co-designing processes that create sustainable approaches. METHODS: Academic researchers, older adults, and community- and health system-based healthcare professionals engaged in a participatory process to better understand medication reconciliation barriers and co-design solutions. The initiative consisted of two participatory research approaches: (1) Sparks Innovation Studios, which synthesized professional expertise and opinions, and (2) a Community Consultation Studio with older adults. Input from both groups informed a list of possible solutions and these were ranked based on evaluative criteria of feasibility, person-centeredness, equity, and sustainability. RESULTS: Sparks Innovation Studios identified a lack of ownership, fragmented healthcare systems, and time constraints as the leading barriers to medication reconciliation. The Community Consultation Studio revealed that older adults often feel dismissed in medical encounters and perceive poor communication with and among providers. The Community Consultation Studio and Sparks Innovation Studios resulted in four highly-ranked solutions to improve medication reconciliation: (1) support for older adults to improve health literacy and ownership; (2) ensuring medication indications are included on prescription labels; (3) trainings and incentives for front-line staff in clinic settings to become champions for medication reconciliation; and (4) electronic health record improvements that simplify active medication lists. CONCLUSION: Engaging community representatives with academic partners in the research process enhanced understanding of community priorities and provided a practical roadmap for innovations that have the potential to improve the well-being of community-dwelling older adults.

Medication management for patients with hip fracture at a regional hospital and associated primary care units in Norway: a descriptive study based on a survey of clinicians' experience and a review of patient records.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with hip fracture are at high risk of medication errors due to a combination of high age, comorbidities, polypharmacy and several care transitions after fracture. The aim was to study medication management tasks concerning patient safety: medication reconciliation, medication review and communication of key medication information in care transitions. DESIGN: Descriptive study comprising a self-administered clinician survey (MedHipPro-Q) and a retrospective review of hospital medical records of patients with hip fracture. SETTING: Regional hospital and the associated primary care units (South-Eastern Norway). PARTICIPANTS: The survey received responses from 253 clinicians, 61 medical doctors and 192 nurses, involved in the medication management of patients with hip fracture, from acute admittance to the regional hospital, through an in-hospital fast track, primary care rehabilitation and back to permanent residence. Respondents' representativeness was unknown, introducing a risk of selection and non-response bias, and extrapolating findings should be done with caution. The patient records review included a random sample of records of patients with hip fracture (n=50). OUTCOME MEASURES: Medication reconciliation, medication review and communication of medication information from two perspectives: the clinicians' (ie, experiences with medication management) and the practice (ie, documentation of completed medication management). RESULTS: In the survey, most clinicians stated they performed medication reconciliation (79%) and experienced that patients often arrived without a medication list after care transition (37%). Doctors agreed that more patients would benefit from medication reviews (86%). In the hospital patient records, completed medication reconciliation was documented in most patients (76%). Medication review was documented in 2 of 50 patients (4%). Discharge summary guidelines were followed fully for 3 of 50 patients (6%). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a need for improved medication management for patients with hip fracture. Patients were at risk of medication information not being transferred correctly between care settings, and medication reviews seemed to be underused in clinical practice.

Impact of Medication Reconciliation by a Dialysis Pharmacist.

Integrating a pharmacist into a hemodialysis unit significantly reduced medication discrepancies and medication-related problems over time.Medication reconciliation for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program can be optimally performed by a dialysis pharmacist.

Protocol for the implementation of pharmaceutical care in geriatrics: strategy for safety in health care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of the implementation of pharmaceutical care in a geriatric hospital unit and to propose an instructional protocol for the practice. METHODS: Experience report that became the practice manual of pharmaceutical care in geriatrics (MaP-CFarmaGeri) of a Brazilian hospital and was structured in three topics (1. Situational diagnosis; 2. Adequacy of the procedure and service provision; 3. Practice exercise). RESULTS: The situational diagnosis comprised the collection of data on the structure of the ward and the epidemiological profile. The pharmaceutical services provided included pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, medication reconciliation and pharmacotherapy review. The certification of the content of this procedure was attested by specialists from a multiprofessional team and the technique served more than 60 patients in practice, with good acceptance by the participants. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: The MaP-CFarmaGeri proved to be a satisfactory strategy in the implementation of pharmaceutical care in geriatrics and can support this insertion in similar locations.

Impact of integrated medication management program on medication errors in a medical center: an interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors (MEs) are harmful to patients during hospitalization, especially elderly patients. To reduce MEs, an integrated medication management (IMM) model was developed in a 2500-bed medical center, allowing a clinical pharmacist to participate in the daily ward round and perform medication reconciliation and medication reviews. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the IMM model on MEs and medication utilization using a quasi-experimental design. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time-series study using the aggregated data of monthly admissions from two wards of a medical center, where one ward served as the intervention and the other served as the external control. The pre- and post-intervention phases comprised of 40 and 12 monthly observational units, respectively. The primary outcome was the mean number of ME reports, which were further investigated for different ME types. The mean number of daily inpatient prescriptions, mean number of daily self-prepared medications, and median daily medication costs were measured. All outcomes were measured per admission episode. Segmented regression was used to evaluate the level and slope changes in the outcomes after IMM model implementation, and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the effects on different groups. RESULTS: After IMM model implementation, the mean number of ME reports increased (level change: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 1.35, P < 0.001). The number of reports has shown a dramatic increase in omissions or medication discrepancies, inappropriate drug choices, and inappropriate routes or formulations. Furthermore, the mean number of daily inpatient prescriptions was reduced for patients aged ≥75 years (level change: -1.78, 95% CI: -3.06 to -0.50, P = 0.009). No significant level or slope change was observed in the control ward during the post-intervention phase. CONCLUSIONS: The IMM model improved patient safety and optimized medication utilization by increasing the reporting of MEs and decreasing the number of medications used.

Standardized assessment of medication reconciliation in post-acute care.

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation (MR) facilitates safety during transitions of care, which occur frequently across post-acute care (PAC) settings. Under the intent of the IMPACT Act of 2014, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services contracted with the RAND Corporation to develop and test standardized assessment data elements (SADEs) that assess the MR process. METHODS: We employed an iterative process that incorporated stakeholder input and three rounds of testing to identify, refine, and evaluate MR SADEs. Testing took place in 186 PAC sites (57 home health agencies, 28 inpatient rehabilitation facilities, 28 long-term care hospitals, and 73 skilled nursing facilities). There were 2951 patients in the final test. Novel MR SADEs, based on the Joint Commission's framework, were refined. The final SADEs assessed whether: patient was taking high-risk medications; an indication was noted for each medication class; discrepancies were identified; patient or family/caregiver was involved in addressing discrepancies; discrepancies were communicated to physician (or designee) within 24 h; recommended physician actions regarding discrepancies were implemented within 24 h after physician response; and the reconciled list was communicated to patient, prescriber, and/or pharmacy. Two assessors per facility collected data for each patient. Analyses described completion time, data missingness, and interrater reliability, as well as feedback on assessor burden. RESULTS: Time to complete the MR SADEs was 3.2 min. Missing data were <5%. Interrater reliability was moderate to high (κ: 0.42 [whether a reconciled list was communicated to prescribers] to 0.89 [identifying patients taking hypoglycemics]). For identifying high-risk medication classes, interrater reliability was high (κ: 0.72-0.89). There were minimal differences by setting. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first set of MR SADEs that have been assessed across the PAC settings. Results demonstrate feasibility, based on missing data and completion time, and moderate to strong reliability, based on interrater comparisons, of assessing MR.

Development and initial validation of MedHipPro-Q: a questionnaire assessing medication management of hip fracture patients in different care settings.

BACKGROUND: A validated questionnaire to assess medication management of hip fracture patients within and outside the hospital setting was lacking. The study aims were to describe the hip fracture patient pathway, and develop a valid and feasible questionnaire to assess clinicians' experience with medication management of hip fracture patients in different care settings throughout the patient pathway. METHODS: This qualitative, descriptive methodological study used strategic and snowball sampling. The questionnaire was developed, and face and content validity explored through interviews with stakeholders. Phase I described the hip fracture patient pathway, and identified questionnaire dimensions in semi-structured interviews with management and clinicians (n = 37). The patient pathway was also discussed in six meetings (n = 70). Phase II refined a first draft of the questionnaire through cognitive interviews with future respondents (n = 23). The draft was modified after each interview. Post hoc, cognitive interview data were analysed using matrix analysis to condense problems and solutions into themes and subthemes. Phase III, converted the final version to a digital format, and tested its feasibility with a subset of the cognitive interview participants (n = 21) who completed the questionnaire and provided feedback. RESULTS: Phase I: Hip fracture patients were cared for in at least three different care settings, and went through at least four handovers between and within primary and secondary care. Three questionnaire dimensions were identified: 1) Medication reconciliation and review, 2) Communication of key information, and 3) Profession and setting. Phase II: The MedHipPro-Q was representative of how the different professions experienced medication management in all settings, and hence showed face and content validity. Post hoc analysis: Problem themes (with sub-themes) were Representativeness (-of patient pathway and -of respondent reality) and Presentation (Language and Appearance). Solution themes (with sub-themes) were: Content (added or deleted) and Presentation (modified appearance or corrected language). Phase III: Participants did not identify technical, linguistic or content flaws in the questionnaire, and the digital version was considered feasible for use. CONCLUSION: The novel MedHipPro-Q showed good face and content validity, and was feasible for use throughout the hip fracture patient pathway. The rigorous development process supports its construct validity and reliability.