Long-term outcomes in virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study is an economic evaluation comparing virtual surgical planning (VSP) utilization to free hand mandibular reconstruction (FHR) for advanced oral cavity cancer, for which the cost effectiveness remains poorly understood. The proposed clinical benefits of VSP must be weighed against the additional upfront costs. METHODS: A Markov decision analysis model was created for VSP and FHR based on literature review and institutional data over a 35-year time horizon. Model parameters were derived and averaged from systematic review and institutional experience. VSP cost and surgical time saving was incorporated. We accounted for long-term risks including cancer recurrence and hardware failure/exposure. We calculated cost in US dollars and effectiveness in quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs). A health care perspective was adopted, discounting costs and effectiveness at 3%/year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested model robustness. RESULTS: In the base case scenario, total VSP strategy cost was $49,498 with 8.37 QALYs gained while FHR cost was $42,478 with 8.27 QALY gained. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), or the difference in cost/difference in effectiveness, for VSP was calculated at $68,382/QALY gained. VSP strategy favorability was sensitive to variations of patient age at diagnosis and institutional VSP cost with one-way sensitivity analysis. VSP was less economically favorable for patients >75.5 years of age or for institutional VSP costs >$10,745. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 55% of iterations demonstrated an ICER value below a $100,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE: VSP is economically favorable compared to FHR in patients requiring mandibular reconstruction for advanced oral cancer, but these results are sensitive to the patient's age at diagnosis and the institutional VSP cost. Our results do not suggest if one "should or should not" use VSP, rather, emphasizes the need for patient selection regarding which patients would most benefit from VSP when evaluating quality of life and long-term complications. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate improved long-term risk for hardware failure/exposure in VSP compared to FHR.

In-house virtual surgical planning and guided mandibular reconstruction is less precise, but more economical and time-efficient than commercial procedures.

BACKGROUND: To compare an in-house and a commercially available surgical planning solution for mandibular reconstruction in terms of postoperative reconstruction accuracy and economic benefit. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) requiring segmental mandibular reconstruction were enrolled. Fifteen patients underwent in-house surgical planning and 14 patients underwent a commercially available planning solution. A morphometric comparison of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) data sets and a cost-benefit comparison were performed. RESULTS: Volumes of planned and reconstructed bone segments differed significantly for both in-house planning (p = 0.0431) and commercial planning (p < 0.0001). Significant differences in osteotomy angles were demonstrated for in-house planning (p = 0.0391). Commercial planning was superior to in-house planning for total mandibular deviation (p = 0.0217), intersegmental space volumes (p = 0.0035), and lengths (p = 0.0007). No significant difference was found between the two planning solutions in terms of intersegmental ossification and the incidence of wound healing disorders. In-house planning took less time than commercial planning (p < 0.0001). Component manufacturing costs (p < 0.0001) and total cumulative costs (p < 0.0001) were significantly lower for in-house planning. CONCLUSIONS: In-house surgical planning is less accurate but has a cost advantage and could be performed in less time.

Tissue Expander Followed by Autogenous Bone Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Graft Alone for Mandibular Reconstruction: Quantitative Assessment.

BACKGROUND: The use of a tissue expander in maxillofacial intraoral tissue reconstruction is a developing approach, which provide adequate tissue coverage and aesthetics. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the use of a soft tissue expander in conjunction with autogenous bone graft with bone graft alone for the repair of the mandible's anterior region. METHODS: The study comprised 24 patients with bone defects in the anterior mandibular region. Patients were divided into 2 groups at random. In group I, expander with bone graft was used, whereas in group II, bone graft was used alone. Volumetric measures of the grafted area was performed using CBCT, and cephalometric evaluations of the anteroposterior and vertical skeletal relationship, as well as the soft tissue profile were recoded. A comparison was made between the 2 groups 6 and 24 months after surgery with P ≤ 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: The mean difference in grafted bone volume between the 2 groups was 1.95 cm 3 , indicating a significant difference between the 2 groups ( P = 0.05) with superior group I results. The soft tissue profile of group I demonstrated a considerable improvement and stability of the lower lip, the labiomental sulcus, and the thickness of the soft tissue Pogonion compared with group II. CONCLUSION: The use of a tissue expander in conjunction with a bone graft resulted in a better soft tissue profile, making it a favored approach in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Fibula Jaw-in-a-Day with Minimal Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing: Maximizing Efficiency, Cost-Effectiveness, Intraoperative Flexibility, and Quality.

SUMMARY: The vascularized fibular flap has been the mainstay for mandibular reconstruction for over 30 years. Its latest evolutionary step is the jaw-in-a-day operation, during which the fibula flap and dental prosthesis restoration are performed in a single stage. Computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in mandibular reconstruction has gained popularity, as it simplifies the procedure and produces excellent outcomes. However, it is costly, time-consuming, and limited in cases that involve complex defects, including bone and soft-tissue coverage. Moreover, it does not allow for intraoperative changes in the surgical plan, including defect size and recipient vessel selection.The authors describe their approach, including a conventional technique for fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap harvest without the need for a premanufactured cutting guide, using bundled wooden tongue spatulas instead, a stereolithographic model to customize commercially ready-made reconstruction plates, and two pieces of resin to maintain occlusive alignment of the remaining jaw segments during mandibular osteotomy. Dental implants are inserted free-hand. Vector guides are then connected to the implants following insertion into the fibula to confirm acceptable alignment and subsequently replaced with scan sensors. An intraoperative digital scan is used to design and to produce a dental prosthesis by in-house milling of a polymethylmethacrylate block. From our 10-case experience over the past 3 years, we have found that our approach offers a reliable method that matches the excellent outcomes seen using full computer-assisted design and manufacturing technology. It is time- and cost-effective, not limited to relatively simple jaw defects, and can readily accommodate intraoperative changes of surgical plan.

Strategic use of obturator prostheses for the rehabilitation of oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the current pandemic scenario, maxillofacial rehabilitation specialists involved with supportive care in cancer must transform its practice to cope with COVID-19 and improve protocols that could quickly return the oral function of complex cancer patients who cannot wait for surgical complex rehabilitation. This includes the role of the maxillofacial prosthodontist for the rehabilitation of surgically treated patients with maxillary cancers by the means of filling obturator prostheses that are considered an optimal scientific-based strategy to reduce hospital stay with excellent pain control, oral function (speech, swallowing, mastication, and facial esthetics), psychologic and quality of life outcomes for the patients following intraoral cancer resection. Therefore, the aim of this commentary was to bring new lights to the strategic use of obturator prostheses for the rehabilitation of oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to present a protocol for managing such cases.

Assessment of fibula flap with flexor hallucis longus's effect on head & neck tumor patients' quality of life and function of donor site.

OBJECTIVE: Free fibular flaps (FFFs) have been widely used in mandibular reconstruction. It is still unclear whether retaining flexor hallucis longus (FHL) is needed for flaps. This study introduces a comparison in quality of life and donor-site function between those who have and haven't harvested FHL with FFF. METHODS: Patients with FFFs were single-blind-randomly assigned into the FHL group or nFHL group. Patients were followed up preoperatively and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively via subjective evaluations (SF-36/AOFAS) and objective evaluation s(muscle strength and range of motion). Patients' hospitalization and intraoperative information, donor site morbidity were recorded. RESULTS: Each group had 15 patients. The flap harvesting time in FHL group was shorter significantly than nFHL group (125.9 ± 24.8 min vs 146.7 ± 29.9 min, P = 0.048). There were no significant differences in hospitalization information such as operation time, hospitalization days and cost. Donor site morbidities at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively showed no significant differences except for the presence of claw toes (nFHL group > FHL group, 40% vs 0, P = 0.017; 53.3% vs 6.7%, P = 0.014; 60.0% vs 13.3%, P = 0.021). There were no significant differences in SF-36 and AOFAS scores. There were no significant differences in muscle strength and range of motion. CONCLUSION: Excision of the FHL lowered the flap harvesting time. It did not increase donor site morbidity. The impacts on patients' quality of life and foot function were the same. The surgeons can use the FHL without considering the influence on patients if not retaining the FHL.

Time and cost-analysis of virtual surgical planning for head and neck reconstruction: A matched pair analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) uses patient-specific modelling of the facial skeleton to provide a tailored surgical plan which may increase accuracy and reduce operating time. The aim of this study was to perform a time and cost-analysis comparing patients treated with and without VSP-technology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 138 patients undergoing microvascular free flap mandible (76.8%) or maxillary (23.2%) reconstruction between 2010 and 2018 was performed. The cohort was divided into two groups according to reconstruction-approach: non-VSP and proprietary-VSP (P-VSP). Cost-analysis was performed comparing non-VSP and P-VSP by matching patients according to site, bone flap, indication, complexity and age. RESULTS: Fibula, scapula and iliac crest free flaps were used in 92 patients (66.7%), 33 patients (23.9%) and 13 patients (9.4%), respectively. Eight patients (5.8%) required revision of the microvascular anastomosis, of which four flaps were salvaged giving a 2.9% flap failure rate. P-VSP was associated with shorter median length of stay (LOS) (10.0 vs 13.0 days, p = 0.009), lower mean procedure time (507.38 vs 561.75 min, p = 0.042), and similar median total cost ($34939.00 vs $34653.00, p = 0.938), despite higher complexity (2.0 vs 1.0, p = 0.09). In the matched-series, P-VSP was associated with a similar median LOS (10.5 vs 11 days), lower mean procedure time (497 vs 555 min, p = 0.231), lower mean total cost ($35,493 v $37,345) but higher median total cost ($35504.50 vs $32391.50, p = 0.607), although not statistically different. CONCLUSION: VSP-technology represents a helpful surgical tool for complex reconstructions, without adversely impacting on the overall-cost of treatment.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Virtual Surgical Planning in Mandibular Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Because of the complex nature of osteocutaneous free flap mandibular reconstruction, modern technologies such as virtual surgical planning have become popularized to refine the procedure. Compared with usual care, virtual surgical planning has been suggested to reduce operative time and improve accuracy of outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of virtual surgical planning versus usual care in mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was constructed to comparatively understand cost-effectiveness of virtual surgical planning and usual care treatments based on additional costs of virtual surgical planning, and costs attributed to probabilities of postoperative complications. Model structure was informed through qualitative clinical interviews from the University of North Carolina, and supported through University of North Carolina clinical data and literature. Costs and complication probabilities were estimated from the literature. Sensitivity analyses of all uncertain model parameters were performed, and distributional parameters were selected based on best practices. RESULTS: Results of base-case analysis indicated that virtual surgical planning was more costly by a difference of $7099 per person and did not reduce the risk of complications or flap loss. Virtual surgical planning cases had an increased incidence of flap loss by 0.6 percent and an increased incidence of mandibular infection by 6.5 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual surgical planning has upfront expenses that do not necessarily translate into downstream reduction in complications or improved outcomes. Clinical decision-makers would benefit from future research to identify thresholds whereby virtual surgical planning may result in more cost-savings for particular types of patients.

Maxillofacial reconstruction using in-house virtual surgical planning.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular and maxillary reconstruction using fibula free transfer is common in many tertiary referral centres. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is a relatively recent adjunct that allows surgeons to plan resection and reconstruction prior to theatre. This has been shown to reduce operative times and decrease surgeon stress intraoperatively. VSP requires technicians with the appropriate skill set and required materials, software and technology, which is accompanied by a cost that may be prohibitive. Usually, this is outsourced to an external company. We present a preliminary case series of VSP in maxillofacial reconstruction done using our own staff without external resources. METHODS: Six patients underwent mandible (n = 5) or maxillary (n = 1) reconstruction with a fibula free flap using in-house VSP. The cases ranged from relatively simple to complex. We present our steps in the planning process and application of this technique. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In-house VSP is a feasible process with low cost and turnaround time, making surgery more efficient.