Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Retina ; 42(1): 33-37, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34483317

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the cost and utility of scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and PPV with SB (PPV/SB) for moderately complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. METHODS: Cost-utility analysis using data from the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study. The model estimated costs, lifetime utility, and lifetime cost per quality-adjusted life year for treatment of moderately complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with SB, PPV, or PPV/SB. Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used to calculate costs in hospital and ambulatory surgery center settings. RESULTS: Total costs (2020 US dollars) for repair of a moderately complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in hospital (ambulatory surgery center) settings were $5,975 ($3,774) for the SB group, $8,125 ($5,082) for the PPV group, and $7,551 ($4,713) for the PPV/SB group. The estimated lifetime quality-adjusted life years gained were 5.4, 4.7, and 4.7 in the SB, PPV, and PPV/SB groups, respectively. The cost per quality-adjusted life year for hospital and ambulatory surgery center settings was $1,106 a ($699) for the SB group, $1729 ($1,081) for the PPV group, and $1,607 ($1,003) for the PPV/SB group. CONCLUSION: Scleral buckle, PPV, and PPV/SB yielded very favorable cost-utility results for the repair of moderately complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with slightly better results for SB, compared with current willingness to pay standards.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Medicare/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Acuidade Visual , Vitrectomia/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 200: 187-200, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30684455

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine factors predictive of anatomic, visual, and financial outcomes after traditional and nontraditional primary pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series and cost comparison. METHODS: Participants: Total of 178 eyes (156 patients) with PR-repaired primary RD by a single surgeon at a clinical practice from January 2001 to December 2013 and followed for ≥1 year. The cohort had 2 subgroups: traditional (TPR) and nontraditional (NTPR) PR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics associated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic outcomes. Cost analysis and potential cost savings comparing PR to scleral buckle and vitrectomy. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one of 178 eyes (73.5%) were successfully treated at 1 year (postoperative year 1): 72.8% (75/103) in TPR and 74.6% (56/75) in NTPR. Macula-off detachment (-0.44 logMAR, P < .001) and clock hours of RD (-0.84 logMAR, P < .001) correlated with improved BCVA; pseudophakia (0.26 logMAR, P = .002) and inferior retinal tears (0.62 logMAR, P = .009) correlated with worsening BCVA. Pseudophakia (-0.15, P = .03), inferior quadrant RD (-0.27, P < .001), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (-0.68, P < .001) correlated with anatomic failure. Total average cost for TPR and NTPR was $1248.37 ± $882.11 and $1471.91 ± $942.84, respectively (P = .10). PR had a potential cost savings of 62% and 60.8% when compared to scleral buckle and vitrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PR results in successful anatomic and visual outcomes in both TPR and NTPR repair of primary RD. Preoperative pseudophakia is associated with worse visual outcomes and less anatomic success. The cost of primary PR and subsequent procedures to achieve final anatomic success was not significantly different between TPR and NTPR, and supports the possible cost-effectiveness of expanded indications for PR.


Assuntos
Crioterapia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Terapia a Laser/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Crioterapia/métodos , Tamponamento Interno , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Descolamento Retiniano/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Hexafluoreto de Enxofre/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitrectomia/economia
3.
Ophthalmology ; 125(1): 43-50, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28732590

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the costs and cost-utility of examination for posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and treatment of associated pathology, and of managing various other peripheral retinal disorders to prevent retinal detachment (RD). DESIGN: A decision analysis model of cost-utility. PARTICIPANTS: There were no participants. METHODS: Published retrospective data on the natural course of PVD, retinal tears, and lattice degeneration were used to quantitate the visual benefits of examination and treatment. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to calculate associated modeled costs in a hospital/facility-based and nonfacility/ambulatory surgical center (ASC)-based setting. Published standards of utility for a given level of visual acuity were used to derive costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of evaluation and treatment, utility of defined health states, QALY, and cost per QALY. RESULTS: The modeled cost of evaluation of a patient with PVD and treatment of associated pathology in the facility/hospital (nonfacility/ASC)-based setting was $65 to $190 ($25-$71) depending on whether a single or 2-examination protocol was used. The cost per QALY saved was $255 to $638/QALY ($100-$239/QALY). Treatment of a symptomatic horseshoe tear resulted in a net cost savings of $1749 ($1314) and improved utility, whereas treatment of an asymptomatic horseshoe tear resulted in $2981/QALY ($1436/QALY). Treatment of asymptomatic lattice degeneration in an eye in which the fellow eye had a history of RD resulted in $4414/QALY ($2187/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation and management of incident acute PVD (and symptomatic horseshoe tears) offer a low cost and a favorable cost-utility (low $/QALY) as a result of the minimization of the cost and morbidity associated with the development of RD, thus justifying current practice standards.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Terapia a Laser/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Acuidade Visual , Vitrectomia/economia , Descolamento do Vítreo/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Descolamento Retiniano/etiologia , Descolamento Retiniano/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Descolamento do Vítreo/complicações , Descolamento do Vítreo/cirurgia
4.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 22(1): 13-9, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24527711

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To perform a short-term and a long-term cost-utility analysis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery in Shanghai, China. METHODS: A total of 117 patients who underwent RRD surgery at Shanghai First People's Hospital, Affiliated Shanghai Jiaotong University, and then underwent follow-up for at least 1 year, were included in the study. Costs associated with RRD surgery and time trade-off utility values before and after surgery were recorded. Short-term analysis was made for 1 year. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by RRD surgery over the lifetime were calculated at a 3% discount rate in the long-term analysis. This study used the bootstrap method in statistical analysis and one-way sensitivity analyses to test robustness of the results. RESULTS: Compared with no treatment, the mean incremental costs of RRD surgery was 11,384 Chinese yuan (CN¥) (US$1751); the mean additional QALYs gained was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.06) for 1 year and 0.88 (95% CI 0.64-1.13) for life expectancy; the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CN¥224,921 (US$34,603)/QALY for the short-term, and CN¥13,794 (US$2122)/QALY for the long-term. In short-term analysis, the ICER was CN¥150,087 (US$23,090)/QALY for scleral buckling surgery, and CN¥507,727 (US$78,112)/QALY for vitreous surgery. In the long-term analysis, the ICER was CN¥6280 (US$966)/QALY for scleral buckling, and CN¥30,756 (US$4732)/QALY for vitreous surgery. CONCLUSIONS: For RRD patients, surgery increases QALYs. In a 1-year analysis, surgery is not a cost-effective treatment, however it is cost-effective over the lifetime.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Vitrectomia/economia , Adulto , Idoso , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Descolamento Retiniano/psicologia , Perfil de Impacto da Doença
5.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e110256, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25330168

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery on elderly patients in terms of visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and its cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Elderly patients over 70 years old, who were diagnosed and underwent RRD surgery at Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China, from January 1, 2009, through January 1, 2013. The participants received scleral buckling surgery and vitreous surgery with or without scleral buckling under retrobulbar anesthesia. We followed the patients for 1 year and collected best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), vision-related quality of life, and direct medical costs data. Utility values elicited by time-trade-off were analyzed to determine the quality of life. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in life expectancy were calculated and discounted at 3% annually. Costs per QALY gained were reported using the bootstrap method. Further analyses were made for two age groups, age 70-79 and age over 80 years. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test stability of the results. RESULTS: 98 patients were included in the study. The BCVA significantly improved by 0.53±0.44 (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR)) at the 1-year postoperative time point (p<0.001). Utility values increased from 0.77 to 0.84 (p<0.001), and an average of 0.4 QALYs were gained in the life expectancy. Costs per QALY gained from the RRD surgery were 33,186 Chinese Yuan (CNY) (5,276 US dollars (USD))/QALY; 24,535 CNY (3,901 USD)/QALY for the age group of 70-79 years and 71,240 CNY (11,326 USD)/QALY for the age group over 80 years. CONCLUSIONS: RRD surgery improved the visual acuity and quality of life in the elderly patients over 70 years old. According to the World Health Organization's recommendation, at a threshold of willingness to pay of 115,062 CNY (18,293 USD)/QALY, RRD surgery is cost effective in the elderly patients.


Assuntos
Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Recurvamento da Esclera/métodos , Acuidade Visual
6.
Ophthalmology ; 121(4): 946-51, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24411577

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate costs and treatment benefits of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) repair. DESIGN: A Markov model of cost-effectiveness and utility. PARTICIPANTS: There were no participants. METHODS: Published clinical trials (index studies) of pneumatic retinopexy (PR), scleral buckling (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and laser prophylaxis were used to quantitate surgical management and visual benefits. Markov analysis, with data from the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services, was used to calculate the adjusted costs of primary repair by each modality in a hospital-based and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lines of visual acuity (VA) saved, cost of therapy, adjusted cost of therapy, cost per line saved, cost per line-year saved, and cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) saved. RESULTS: In the facility, hospital surgery setting, weighted cost for PR ranged from $3726 to $5901 depending on estimated success rate of primary repair. Weighted cost was $6770 for SB, $7940 for PPV, and $1955 for laser prophylaxis. The dollars per line saved ranged from $217 to $1346 depending on the procedure. Dollars per line-year saved ranged from $11 to $67. Dollars per QALY saved ranged from $362 to $2243. In the nonfacility, ASC surgery setting, weighted cost for PR ranged from $1961 to $3565 depending on the success rate of primary repair. The weighted costs for SB, PPV, and laser prophylaxis were $4873, $5793, and $1255, respectively. Dollars per line saved ranged from $139 to $982. The dollars per line-year saved ranged from $7 to $49, and the dollars per QALY saved ranged from $232 to $1637. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment and prevention of RD are extremely cost-effective when compared with other treatment of other retinal diseases regardless of treatment modality. Retinal detachment treatment costs did not vary widely, suggesting that providers can tailor patient treatments solely on the basis of optimizing anticipated results because there were no overriding differences in financial impact.


Assuntos
Criocirurgia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Terapia a Laser/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Vitrectomia/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Descolamento Retiniano/fisiopatologia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
7.
Ophthalmology ; 121(1): 318-326, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23953099

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To provide insight into the preoperative factors that affect outcome after pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Additionally, we sought to analyze the cost of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair in the United States to determine potential cost savings with pneumatic retinopexy. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, observational consecutive case series and third party payer-perspective comparative cost analysis. PARTICIPANTS: We included 141 eyes undergoing pneumatic retinopexy for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: Preoperative characteristics, anatomic outcomes, and best-available visual acuity were collected. Anatomic and visual outcomes were analyzed based on the presence of selected preoperative factors. The primary cohort was divided into 2 groups based on preoperative characteristics: (1) traditional pneumatic retinopexy and (2) nontraditional pneumatic retinopexy. Comparative cost analyses were performed between pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckling, and vitrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anatomic and visual outcomes at 6 months. RESULTS: Overall anatomic success was 78.7% and visual acuity improved significantly (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.48-0.25; P <0.005). A 97.6% final anatomic success rate was achieved. Anatomic outcomes were similar between traditional versus nontraditional (84.1% vs 74.4%; P = 0.16), phakic versus pseudophakic (79.1% vs 78.0%; P = 0.88), and macula-on versus macula-off (77.9% vs 81.1%; P = 0.68) groups. Anatomic failure was predicted by the presence of an inferior retinal break (P <0.005) or visible vitreous traction on a retinal break (P = 0.04). Visual outcomes were similar between each of the traditional versus nontraditional (logMAR 0.21 vs 0.27; P >0.05) and phakic versus pseudophakic groups (logMAR 0.23 vs 0.28; P >0.05). Visual outcomes were better in macula-on detachments compared with those in which the macula was detached (logMAR 0.18 vs 0.42; P <0.005). Annual health care cost savings in the United States ranging from $6 to $30 million are theoretically possible by increasing pneumatic retinopexy utilization from the current rate of 15% to 20%-35%. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatic retinopexy is an effective treatment modality for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Anatomic and visual outcomes are similar for traditional and nontraditional preoperative inclusion criteria, as well as phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Inferior breaks and visible vitreous traction on a tear predicted failure. Increased utilization of pneumatic retinopexy would achieve significant cost savings while maintaining outcomes.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos/economia , Criocirurgia/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Local , Custos e Análise de Custo , Tamponamento Interno , Feminino , Fluorocarbonos/administração & dosagem , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Hexafluoreto de Enxofre/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Acuidade Visual , Vitrectomia/economia
8.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 156(4): 661-6, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23876865

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To estimate and compare the costs of scleral buckle (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Cost analysis based on published prospective data comparing SB and PPV for RRD repair. METHODS: The costs of initial surgery, postoperative retina-affecting procedures, and eventual cataract extraction resulting from SB and PPV for RRD repair were estimated for both phakic and pseudophakic or aphakic patients and then were compared. A univariate sensitivity analysis also was performed to examine the sensitivity of our estimations. RESULTS: When considering all costs, SB was 10.7% less expensive than PPV for RRD repair in phakic patients, whereas PPV was 12% less expensive than SB for RRD repair in pseudophakic or aphakic patients. These conclusions were robust in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: SB seems to offer a modest cost savings over PPV for repair of RRD in phakic patients. However, in pseudophakic and aphakic patients, PPV seems to be less expensive than SB.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Vitrectomia/economia , Extração de Catarata/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Estudos Prospectivos , Pseudofacia/economia , Retina/fisiopatologia , Descolamento Retiniano/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
9.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc ; 95: 551-78, 1997.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9440187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic retinopexy is an operation for reattaching the retina by injecting an expanding gas bubble and using laser and/or cryopexy. The procedure is controversial because the literature reports a variable initial success rate, sometimes less than conventional scleral buckling surgery. PR is done in an office setting and may be the most cost-effective means of retinal reattachment. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to decide which eyes are most successfully treated with pneumatic retinopexy, and which pneumatic technique is most effective. METHODS: Three hundred two (302) consecutive retinal detachments treated by one surgeon with pneumatic retinopexy and followed for six months to ten years were reviewed. Risk factors for failure were detected. The cost of treating eyes with pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling was compared using Medicare reimbursement rates. RESULTS: The average single operation success (SOS) rate for all 302 cases was 68%; 95% were ultimately attached with additional surgery. Factors adversely affecting SOS included pseudophakia/aphakia, the extent of the retinal detachment, and the number of retinal breaks. Factors not influencing SOS included the type of retinal break, the presence of lattice degeneration, the type, volume and sequence of gas injection, retinopexy with laser or cryotherapy, and gender. Complete 360 degrees peripheral retinopexy between the insertion of the vitreous base and ora serrata significantly improved SOS. A 97% SOS rate was detected for a subgroup of eyes. This subgroup included phakic eyes with one quadrant of the retina detached, and one retinal break located in the upper two-thirds of the fundus. Treatment included 360 degrees of peripheral retinopexy. Factors positively influencing visual recovery included SOS, better preoperative acuity, macular attachment, duration of macular detachment less than eight days, and younger age. Eighty-six percent of eyes cured with a single operation attained 20/40 or better acuity. The cost of repairing these 302 cases with pneumatic retinopexy, including reoperations, was estimated to be approximately half the cost of repairing a similar group with scleral buckling. With careful patient selection and peripheral 360 degrees retinopexy, the cost of PR may be one quarter the cost of scleral buckling. CONCLUSIONS: Success with PR, as with other surgical procedures, depends upon proper case selection and surgical technique. Ideal case selection and peripheral 360 degrees retinopexy can increase the SOS rate to 97%. Even with reoperations, PR is more cost effective than scleral buckling.


Assuntos
Criocirurgia/métodos , Fotocoagulação a Laser/métodos , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Criocirurgia/economia , Feminino , Fluorocarbonos/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Fotocoagulação a Laser/economia , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Hexafluoreto de Enxofre/administração & dosagem , Acuidade Visual
10.
Ophthalmology ; 99(9): 1358-63, 1992 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1407969

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retinal detachments are usually considered to be a surgical emergency. However, there are additional risks and costs for unnecessary emergency surgeries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the conventional wisdom for treating all retinal detachments as emergencies needs to be re-examined. METHODS: Forty-eight patients who had an emergency scleral buckle and 89 patients who had a scheduled procedure were randomly selected from 884 consecutive patients who had a primary scleral buckling procedure during a 4 1/2-year period. The medical records of each patient were used to obtain detailed information related to prognosis. The visual acuity measurements of each patient, taken 6 months after the procedure, were obtained from the records of the ophthalmologist following the patient. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the final visual outcome for patients who had emergency surgery with patients who had scheduled surgery after taking into account patient factors related to prognosis. RESULTS: Patients selected for emergency surgery had better visual prognoses than scheduled patients but had the same risk of systemic complications and the same extent of detachment if the macula was not involved. None of the 18 patients with an attached macula experienced macular involvement while awaiting scheduled surgery. There were no differences between emergency and scheduled patients in ocular or systemic complications, rate of reattachment, rate of decreased visual acuity after surgery, visual outcome adjusted for prognosis, or, since 1985, length of hospital stay. A greater cost was incurred for the patients having emergency surgery due to difference in pay scales for support personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Because the study is not large and the patients were not randomized to treatment, the results are not definitive. However, they suggest that emergency surgery is unnecessary for many patients with a detached retina.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Agendamento de Consultas , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Emergências , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Distribuição Aleatória , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Acuidade Visual
11.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc ; 89: 271-80; discussion 280-3, 1991.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1808810

RESUMO

Conventional wisdom holds that a retinal detachment of recent onset should be regarded as a surgical emergency. A delay in surgery may result in an extension of detachment for patients with an attached macula and a worse visual outcome for patients with a detached macula. However, the potential disadvantages of performing surgery on an emergency basis must be weighed against the risks of delaying surgery; disadvantages include a greater frequency of operative complications resulting from fatigue factors among the operating personnel, an increased anesthetic risk due to inadequate time to assess and stabilize coexisting medical problems, and higher hospital costs. In this retrospective study covering 4 1/2 years, we compared the risks, benefits, length of hospitalization, and costs of scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachments performed as an emergency procedure or on the day following admission. After a 15% random selection from 884 consecutive operations, 48 emergency procedures were compared with 89 scheduled procedures. Patients selected for emergency surgery had better visual prognoses than scheduled patients. The potential for risk of systemic complications was not a reason for postponing surgery. None of the 18 patients with an attached macula experienced macular involvement while awaiting scheduled surgery. There were no differences between emergency and scheduled patients in ocular or systemic complications, rate of reattachment, rate of decreased visual acuity following surgery, visual outcome adjusted for prognosis, or, since 1985, length of hospital stay. Cost was greater for patients having emergency surgery, because of a difference in pay scales for support personnel.


Assuntos
Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Emergências , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Distribuição Aleatória , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA