Diabetic nephropathy: new approaches for improving glycemic control and reducing risk.

Nephropathy is a common consequence of diabetes, with a high prevalence in patients with type 1 (15%-25%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 30%-40%). Nephropathy is associated with a poor prognosis and high economic burden. The risk of developing nephropathy increases with the duration of diabetes, and early diagnosis and treatment of risk factors for nephropathy (e.g., tight control of glycemia and hypertension) can reduce the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of renal complications associated with diabetes and the etiology of nephropathy have identified additional risk factors for nephropathy, and novel therapeutic options are being explored. This review discusses the pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy and common risk factors. Furthermore, we discuss emerging treatments for T2DM that could potentially slow or prevent the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The use of incretin-based therapies, such as the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs, is growing in patients with T2DM, due to their efficacy and tolerability profiles. As renal safety is a key factor when choosing treatment options to manage patients with T2DM, drugs that are suitable for use in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment without a requirement for dose adjustment, such as the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin, are of particular use. The ongoing advances in T2DM therapy may allow optimization of glycemic control in a wide range of patients, thereby helping to reduce the increasing morbidity and mortality associated with diabetic nephropathy.

Assessment of glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue and renin inhibitor on the binding and regulation of GLP-1 receptor in type 1 diabetic rat hearts.

This study focuses on the effects of long-term renin-angiotensin system suppression and/or incretin mimetic therapies on the regulation and binding affinity of GLP-1 to its receptor in the coronary endothelium (CE) and cardiomyocytes (CMs) of type 1 diabetic male Sprague-Dawley rats. The groups assessed are normal (N), streptozotocin-induced diabetic (D), Insulin treated (DI), Exendin-4 treated (DE), Aliskiren treated (DA), cotreated with Insulin and Aliskiren (DIA) and cotreated with exendin-4 and Aliskiren (DEA). Heart perfusion with (125)I-GLP-1 was performed to estimate GLP-1 binding affinity (τ = 1/k-n) to its receptor in the heart. Western Blotting was assessed to determine the expression variation of GLP-1 receptor in the heart. Plasma GLP-1 levels were measured using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Diabetes decreased the τ value on CE and increased it on CMs compared to normal. The combination of Exendin-4 with Aliskiren showed a normalizing effect on the binding affinity of GLP-1 at the coronary endothelium, while at the cardiomyocyte level Exendin-4 treatment alone was the most effective.

Hypertension in diabetic nephropathy: epidemiology, mechanisms, and management.

Hypertension is highly prevalent in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of CKD and end-stage kidney disease in the United States. The etiology of hypertension in diabetic nephropathy involves mechanisms with multiple inter-related mediators that result in renal sodium reabsorption and peripheral vasoconstriction. The management of hypertension in these patients is focused on treatments that target these mediators. Clinical trials have established that drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system should be used as first-line agents on the basis of their ability to slow down progression of kidney disease and lower albuminuria. There is further interest into how the combination of drugs that inhibit this pathway at multiple steps will contribute further to the management of hypertension and diabetic nephropathy. This article presents an updated review of the mechanisms involved in hypertension in patients with diabetic nephropathy. It also reviews the past clinical trials using single agents as therapeutics and the more recent trials involving novel drugs or drug combinations used to treat these patients. Retrospective analyses of multiple studies are included to better examine the significance of the currently proposed blood pressure targets for patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Fixed-dose combination and chronic kidney disease progression: which is the best?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Use of combination therapy whether fixed dose or separate pill combinations is becoming more prevalent. Physicians are not routinely trained in using combinations of different antihypertensive medicines. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent outcome trials as well as smaller studies document that meaningful combinations of pharmacologically additive agents help achieve blood pressure (BP) goals faster and reduce outcomes. Clinical trials demonstrate that drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin system, that is, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, combined with either calcium antagonists or thiazide-like diuretics and used as first-line antihypertensive therapy in patients whose BP is more than 20/10 mmHg above goal achieve BP goal faster than sequential monotherapy. Additionally, certain combinations may provide better cardiovascular outcomes than other combinations. Lastly, combination therapy has a clear role in helping to reduce cardiovascular and renal risk, when used. SUMMARY: This review provides an update of current evidence regarding the associations of BP control with use of combination antihypertensive therapy to achieve BP goals. A rationale for initial single pill and fixed-dose combination therapy is reviewed. Only one trial with cardiovascular outcome has been performed using a fixed-dose combination and this revealed differences from other trials, including the greatest number of people achieving goal BP and difference in outcomes based on combination used.

[Therapeutic novelties in the management of arterial hypertension]. / Novedades terapéuticas en el manejo de la HTA.

Arterial hypertension is one of the major risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease and cerebrovascular events. Adequate blood pressure control is vital for the management of patients with vascular disease. New therapeutic alternatives are appearing on the horizon to improve the degree of blood pressure control in these patients, such as direct renin inhibitors, beta-blockers with additional properties, carotid receptor- stimulating devices and vaccination against arterial hypertension. Direct renin inhibitors are a new family of antihypertensive drugs that have so far shown a good antihypertensive effect and an additive effect on reduction of proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Recent meta-analyses suggest that betablockers used as first-line treatment for uncomplicated arterial hypertension could have a less beneficial effect on the development of cardiovascular disease than other antihypertensive drugs. However, the emergence of new subtypes of beta-blockers with other hemodynamic and metabolic properties could change this conception. Carotid receptor-stimulating devices and vaccination against arterial hypertension, although not totally new therapies, are being revitalized, with preliminary results that suggest that they could be used for the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with a specific profile. Although scientifically stimulating, the long-term beneficial effects of these new therapeutic alternatives on target-organ protection still need to be confirmed.

Aliskiren: renin inhibitor for hypertension management.

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has long been recognized to play a significant role in hypertension pathophysiology. Certain agents that modify the RAAS can control blood pressure and improve cardiovascular outcomes. Aliskiren is the first of a new class of antihypertensive agents known as renin inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to discuss the clinical pharmacology of aliskiren and its use in the management of hypertension, as well as potential uses in other cardiovascular disorders. METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles and abstracts were identified from the MEDLINE and Current Contents databases (both 1966-October 1, 2007) using the search terms aliskiren, drug interaction, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacology. Citations from available articles were reviewed for additional references. Abstracts presented at recent professional meetings were also examined. RESULTS: Nine published clinical studies have evaluated the effect of aliskiren in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients, either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. This review summarizes those studies. Patients treated with aliskiren had significantly lower blood pressure compared with patients with mild to moderate hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140-180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95-110 mm Hg) who received placebo. Aliskiren in doses of 75 to 300 mg daily produced reductions of SBP (-5.3 to -15.8 mm Hg) and DBP (-5.8 to -12.3 mm Hg); placebo produced reductions of SBP that ranged from -2.85 to -10.0 mm Hg and DBP reductions from -3.26 to -8.6 mm Hg (P < 0.05 in all studies between aliskiren and placebo). Aliskiren's blood pressure-lowering effect at doses of 75 to 300 mg daily was comparable to irbesartan 150 mg daily and valsartan 80 to 360 mg daily alone. When aliskiren was added to ramipril, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, irbesartan, or valsartan, significant additive blood pressure-lowering effects were reported (P < 0.05 in all clinical trials). The total incidence of adverse events was similar to placebo and other comparative agents, including irbesartan, valsartan, losartan, ramipril, and hydrochlorothiazide. The overall adverse-event rates were 22%, 35% to 52%, 25% to 52%, 34% to 55%, and 33% to 52% for aliskiren 37.5, 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events included headache, dizziness, and fatigue. Studies with cardiovascular outcomes as end points have not been performed with aliskiren. CONCLUSIONS: Aliskiren is an effective alternative agent for blood pressure management. Before aliskiren can be recommended as a routine first-line agent, however, clinical studies must explore if the blood pressure-lowering effect will translate into improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.

Cardiovascular developments: patent highlights July to December 2006.

This overview provides a follow-up to a previously published paper on patent highlights of cardiovascular developments for January to June 2006. A period of six months could not have altered the fundamental preliminaries of the developmental challenges which cardiovascular disorders present to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry, and it was not expected that scientific insight would make quantum leaps during this brief interval. What makes such a repeat analysis nevertheless highly meaningful, beyond providing just another set of recent patent references, is the objective of validation--investigating whether the patterns that were observed during the initial review of the first half of 2006 actually represent established modalities of innovative industry efforts in the cardiovascular field. This objective was met by replicating the previous search of Thomson Scientific's Investigational Drugs database, and by using the same categorization of identified intellectual property disclosures.

The role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the progression of chronic kidney disease.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a well known regulator of blood pressure (BP) and determinant of target-organ damage. It controls fluid and electrolyte balance through coordinated effects on the heart, blood vessels, and Kidneys. Angiotensin II (AII) is the main effector of the RAAS and exerts its vasoconstrictor effect predominantly on the postglomerular arterioles, thereby increasing the glomerular hydraulic pressure and the ultrafiltration of plasma proteins, effects that may contribute to the onset and progression of chronic renal damage. AII may also directly contribute to accelerate renal damage by sustaining cell growth, inflammation, and fibrosis. Interventions that inhibit the activity of the RAAS are renoprotective and may slow or even halt the progression of chronic nephropathies. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists can be used in combination to maximize RAAS inhibition and more effectively reduce proteinuria and GFR decline in diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease. Recent evidence suggests that add-on therapy with an aldosterone antagonist may further increase renoprotection, but may also enhance the risk hyperkalemia. Maximized RAAS inhibition, combined with intensified blood pressure control (and metabolic control in diabetics) and amelioration of dyslipidemia in a multimodal approach including lifestyle modifications (Remission Clinic), may achieve remission of proteinuria and renal function stabilization in a substantial proportion of patients with proteinuric renal disease. Ongoing studies will tell whether novel drugs inhibiting the RAAS, such as the renin inhibitors or the vasopeptidase inhibitors, may offer additional benefits to those who do not respond, or only partially respond, to this multimodal regimen.

Renin inhibitors: cardiovascular drugs of the future?

This review explores whether the therapeutic attractiveness of renin inhibitors compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists, is sufficient to warrant continued interest in their development for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Clinical and experimental data available to date indicate that patients with hypertension and congestive heart failure will benefit from renin inhibition. However, clinical experience is very limited, and extra benefits of renin inhibitors compared with the other blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have yet to be demonstrated. Some experimental data in animals and humans point to a greater effect of acute renin inhibition on renal blood flow than other modes of interference with the RAS. Again, the clinical benefits of such an effect, and particularly after long-term treatment, in hypertension and renal disease need to be determined. In today's cost-conscious health setting, only new drugs that bring additional clinical benefits have a good chance of being commercially viable. It remains to be seen whether renin inhibitors will fulfill these criteria.

Assessment of the role of the renin-angiotensin system in cardiac contractility utilizing the renin inhibitor remikiren.

1. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of myocardial contractility is still debated. In order to investigate whether renin inhibition affects myocardial contractility and whether this action depends on intracardiac rather than circulating angiotensin II, the regional myocardial effects of systemic (i.v.) and intracoronary (i.c.) infusions of the renin inhibitor remikiren, were compared and related to the effects on systemic haemodynamics and circulating angiotensin II in open-chest anaesthetized pigs (25-30 kg). The specificity of the remikiren-induced effects was tested (1) by studying its i.c. effects after administration of the AT1-receptor antagonist L-158,809 and (2) by measuring its effects on contractile force of porcine isolated cardiac trabeculae. 2. Consecutive 10 min i.v. infusions of remikiren were given at 2, 5, 10 and 20 mg min-1. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax were not affected by remikiren at 2 and 5 mg min-1, and were lowered at higher doses. At the highest dose, MAP decreased by 48%, CO by 13%, HR by 14%, SVR by 40%, MVO2 by 28% and LV dp/dtmax by 52% (mean values; P < 0.05 for difference from baseline, n = 5). The decrease in MVO2 was accompanied by a decrease in myocardial work (MAP x CO), but the larger decline in work (55% vs. 28%; P < 0.05) implies a reduced myocardial efficiency ((MAP x CO)/MVO2). 3. Consecutive 10 min i.c. infusions of remikiren were given at 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10 mg min-1. MAP, CO, MVO2 and LV dP/dtmax were not affected by remikiren at 0.2, 0.5 and 1 mg min-1, and were reduced at higher doses. At the highest dose, MAP decreased by 31%, CO by 26%, MVO2 by 46% and LV dP/dtmax by 43% (mean values; P < 0.05 for difference from baseline, n = 6). HR and SVR did not change at any dose. 4. Thirty minutes after a 10 min i.v. infusion of the AT1 receptor antagonist, L-158,809 at 1 mg min-1, consecutive 10 min i.c. infusions (n = 5) of remikiren at 2, 5 and 10 mg min-1 no longer affected CO and MVO2, and decreased LV dP/dtmax by maximally 27% (P < 0.05) and MAP by 14% (P < 0.05), which was less than without AT1-receptor blockade (P < 0.05). HR and SVR remained unaffected. 5. Plasma renin activity and angiotensin I and II were reduced to levels at or below the detection limit at doses of remikiren that were not high enough to affect systemic haemodynamics or regional myocardial function, both after i.v. and i.c. infusion. 6. Remikiren (10(-10) to 10(-4) M) did not affect contractile force of porcine isolated cardiac trabeculae precontracted with noradrenaline. In trabeculae that were not precontracted no decrease in baseline contractility was observed with remikiren in concentrations up to 10(-5) M, whereas at 10(-4) M baseline contractility decreased by 19% (P < 0.05). 7. Results show that with remikiren i.v., at the doses we used, blood pressure was lowered primarily by vasodilation and with remikiren i.c. by cardiac depression. The blood levels of remikiren required for its vasodilator action are lower than the levels affecting cardiac contractile function. A decrease in circulating angiotensin II does not appear to be the sole explanation for these haemodynamic responses. Data support the contention that myocardial contractility is increased by renin-dependent angiotensin II formation in the heart.

Angiotensinergic versus nonangiotensinergic hemodynamic effects of converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure. Assessment by acute renin and converting enzyme inhibition.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of nonangiotensinergic effects of converting enzyme inhibitors to their hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic heart failure is not clear. A comparison of the effects of renin and converting enzyme inhibition should help to clarify this issue. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II or III) were randomly assigned to receive double-blind either intravenous placebo, the renin inhibitor remikiren, or the converting enzyme inhibitor enalaprilat followed by coinfusion of a second placebo infusion, the addition of remikiren to enalaprilat, or the addition of enalaprilat to remikiren, respectively. Systemic hemodynamics (Swan-Ganz and radial artery catheters) were measured before (rest and submaximal recumbent bicycle ergometry), during (rest), and at the end (rest and exercise) of each 45-minute single- or combination-infusion period. Placebo did not change hemodynamics or renin activity. Effective inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system by remikiren and enalaprilat was indicated by increases of plasma immunoreactive renin together with rapid and complete inhibition of renin activity after remikiren and an increase after enalaprilat (all P < or = .05). Remikiren and enalaprilat rapidly and to a similar extent reduced resting blood pressure through a reduction of systemic vascular resistance, and these changes were significantly correlated to baseline plasma renin activity. Both compounds also decreased pulmonary artery, pulmonary capillary wedge, and right atrial pressures to a similar extent (P < .05). During exercise, pulmonary capillary wedge and right atrial pressures were equally reduced and stroke volume index was increased with remikiren and enalaprilat (P < .05) for both). The combination of converting enzyme with renin inhibition or vice versa did not cause additional hemodynamic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Specific renin inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure produces short-term hemodynamic effects that are almost indistinguishable from those of converting enzyme inhibition. This finding and the lack of additional effects of converting enzyme inhibition added to renin inhibition suggest that nonangiotensinergic effects of converting enzyme inhibitors do not play a significant role in their short-term hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic heart failure.

Blood pressure control by the renin-angiotensin system in normotensive subjects. Assessment by angiotensin converting enzyme and renin inhibition.

BACKGROUND: The participation of the renin-angiotensin system in the control of blood pressure in normal, sodium-replete subjects is not clear. The use of a specific inhibitor of human renin should allow a better delineation of the importance of this system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood pressure responses were measured 1 hour after randomized, double-blind administration of the renin inhibitor Ro 42-5892 (600 mg p.o.) or the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril (50 mg p.o.) in 20 healthy men on an ad libitum sodium diet. Effective inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system by either compound was indicated by increases of immunoreactive renin associated with an increase of angiotensin I production rate of 67.8 +/- 33.6% after captopril and a decrease of 79.5 +/- 16.4% after Ro 42-5892. Furthermore, Ro 42-5892 decreased plasma renin activity by 64%. Whereas intra-arterial diastolic (60 +/- 5.1 to 51.4 +/- 7.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and mean arterial (77.7 +/- 6.0 to 71.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) pressures decreased after captopril, they remained unchanged after Ro 42-5892. Captopril, but not Ro 42-5892, increased forearm blood flow (2.4 +/- 0.8 versus 1.9 +/- 0.8 ml/min/100 ml, p less than 0.01) and significantly enhanced the increase of forearm blood flow to brachial artery infusions of bradykinin (0.15, 1.5, 5, 15, and 50 ng/min/100 ml; 5 minutes each) from 744 +/- 632% to 1,383 +/- 514% (p less than 0.01). Furthermore, repeat bradykinin infusions resulted in further decreases of blood pressure (from mean pressure of 71.4 +/- 8.5 to 63.2 +/- 7.6 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) only after captopril. Changes of blood pressure after captopril were unrelated to baseline plasma renin activity but correlated with captopril-induced enhancement of vasodilation to bradykinin (r = 0.68, p less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of blood pressure effects of renin inhibition in contrast to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition suggests that the renin-angiotensin system does not contribute significantly to blood pressure control in normotensive, sodium-replete subjects. The hypotensive activity of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may result from additional hormonal effects, for example, inhibition of bradykinin degradation and/or subsequent increases of vasodilating prostaglandins or endothelium-derived relaxing factor(s).

Assessment of renin dependency of hypertension with a dipeptide renin inhibitor.

To evaluate the participation of the renin-angiotensin system in sustaining hypertension, we administered the specific dipeptide renin inhibitor enalkiren (A-64662) to 18 patients with essential hypertension. Ascending intravenous bolus doses (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg) of the inhibitor were each given at 45-minute intervals to patients maintained on an ad libitum sodium diet who were studied while in bed in the semirecumbent posture. Enalkiren produced marked decreases in plasma renin activity (PRA) that were still evident 8 hours after completion of dosing. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were decreased in a dose-dependent fashion without an effect on heart rate. Repetition of this procedure after patients were subjected to sodium depletion by 1 week of thiazide treatment produced amplified decreases in blood pressure. Despite the short plasma half-life of the inhibitor, these blood pressure-lowering effects were sustained for 4-8 hours when compared with parallel placebo administration in the same patients. Both the baseline PRA and the inhibitor-induced changes in PRA correlated significantly with blood pressure changes during the unstimulated and the sodium-depleted studies. However, effects of the inhibitor on diastolic blood pressure in the latter study correlated most closely with actual increases in renin produced by diuretic pretreatment. Thus, this specific renin inhibitor has demonstrated the dependency of blood pressure on the renin-angiotensin system even during basal conditions in hypertensive patients. Moreover, renin response to sodium depletion appears to be an attribute that additionally characterizes individual hypertensive patients.