A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Duodenoscopy-associated infections occur worldwide despite strict adherence to reprocessing standards. The exact scope of the problem remains unknown because a standardized sampling protocol and uniform sampling techniques are lacking. The currently available multi-society protocol for microbial culturing by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Society for Microbiology, published in 2018 is too laborious for broad clinical implementation. A more practical sampling protocol would result in increased accessibility and widespread implementation. This will aid to reduce the prevalence of duodenoscope contamination. To reduce the risk of duodenoscopy-associated pathogen transmission the FDA advised four supplemental reprocessing measures. These measures include double high-level disinfection, microbiological culturing and quarantine, ethylene oxide gas sterilization and liquid chemical sterilization. When the supplemental measures were advised in 2015 data evaluating their efficacy were sparse. Over the past five years data regarding the supplemental measures have become available that place the efficacy of the supplemental measures into context. As expected the advised supplemental measures have resulted in increased costs and reprocessing time. Unfortunately, it has also become clear that the efficacy of the supplemental measures falls short and that duodenoscope contamination remains a problem. There is a lot of research into new reprocessing methods and technical applications trying to solve the problem of duodenoscope contamination. Several promising developments such as single-use duodenoscopes, electrolyzed acidic water, and vaporized hydrogen peroxide plasma are already applied in a clinical setting.

COVID-19 Solutions Are Climate Solutions: Lessons From Reusable Gowns.

The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the inadequacy of the U.S. healthcare system to deliver timely and resilient care. According to the American Hospital Association, the pandemic has created a $202 billion loss across the healthcare industry, forcing health care systems to lay off workers and making hospitals scramble to minimize supply chain costs. However, as the demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) grows, hospitals have sacrificed sustainable solutions for disposable options that, although convenient, will exacerbate supply strains, financial burden, and waste. We advocate for reusable gowns as a means to lower health care costs, address climate change, and improve resilience while preserving the safety of health care workers. Reusable gowns' polyester material provides comparable capacity to reduce microbial cross-transmission and liquid penetration. In addition, previous hospitals have reported a 50% cost reduction in gown expenditures after adopting reusable gowns; given the current 2000% price increase in isolation gowns during COVID-19, reusable gown use will build both healthcare resilience and security from price fluctuations. Finally, with the United States' medical waste stream worsening, reusable isolation gowns show promising reductions in energy and water use, solid waste, and carbon footprint. The gowns are shown to withstand laundering 75-100 times in contrast to the single-use disposable gown. The circumstances of the pandemic forewarn the need to shift our single-use PPE practices to standardized reusable applications. Ultimately, sustainable forms of protective equipment can help us prepare for future crises that challenge the resilience of the healthcare system.

A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.

PURPOSE: To critically review all literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy comparing single-use with reusable scopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic online literature review was performed in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases. All factors potentially affecting surgical costs or clinical outcomes were considered. Prospective assessments, case control and case series studies were included. RESULTS: 741 studies were found. Of those, 18 were duplicated and 77 were not related to urology procedures. Of the remaining 646 studies, 59 were considered of relevance and selected for further analysis. Stone free and complication rates were similar between single-use and reusable scopes. Operative time was in average 20% shorter with digital scopes, single-use or not. Reusable digital scopes seem to last longer than optic ones, though scope longevity is very variable worldwide. New scopes usually last four times more than refurbished ones and single-use ureterorenoscopes have good resilience throughout long cases. Longer scope longevity is achieved with Cidex and if a dedicated nurse takes care of the sterilization process. The main surgical factors that negatively impact device longevity are lower pole pathologies, large stone burden and non-use of a ureteral access sheath. We have built a comprehensive fi nancial costeffective decision model to fl exible ureteroscope acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of a fl exible ureteroscopy program is dependent of several aspects. We have developed a equation to allow a literature-based and adaptable decision model to every interested stakeholder. Disposable devices are already a reality and will progressively become the standard as manufacturing price falls.

A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices

ABSTRACT Purpose to critically review all literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy comparing single-use with reusable scopes. Materials and Methods A systematic online literature review was performed in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases. All factors potentially affecting surgical costs or clinical outcomes were considered. Prospective assessments, case control and case series studies were included. Results 741 studies were found. Of those, 18 were duplicated and 77 were not related to urology procedures. Of the remaining 646 studies, 59 were considered of relevance and selected for further analysis. Stone free and complication rates were similar between single-use and reusable scopes. Operative time was in average 20% shorter with digital scopes, single-use or not. Reusable digital scopes seem to last longer than optic ones, though scope longevity is very variable worldwide. New scopes usually last four times more than refurbished ones and single-use ureterorenoscopes have good resilience throughout long cases. Longer scope longevity is achieved with Cidex and if a dedicated nurse takes care of the sterilization process. The main surgical factors that negatively impact device longevity are lower pole pathologies, large stone burden and non-use of a ureteral access sheath. We have built a comprehensive financial cost-effective decision model to flexible ureteroscope acquisition. Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program is dependent of several aspects. We have developed a equation to allow a literature-based and adaptable decision model to every interested stakeholder. Disposable devices are already a reality and will progressively become the standard as manufacturing price falls.

Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services.

International corporations in an increasingly globalized economy exert a major influence on the planet's land use and resources through their product design and material sourcing decisions. Many companies use life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate their sustainability, yet commonly-used LCA methodologies lack the spatial resolution and predictive ecological information to reveal key impacts on climate, water and biodiversity. We present advances for LCA that integrate spatially explicit modelling of land change and ecosystem services in a Land-Use Change Improved (LUCI)-LCA. Comparing increased demand for bioplastics derived from two alternative feedstock-location scenarios for maize and sugarcane, we find that the LUCI-LCA approach yields results opposite to those of standard LCA for greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption, and of different magnitudes for soil erosion and biodiversity. This approach highlights the importance of including information about where and how land-use change and related impacts will occur in supply chain and innovation decisions.

Single use versus reuse of endoscopy biopsy forceps: A survey of patient preference.

BACKGROUND: Although there are no confirmatory data on this, we suspect that most endoscopy centres in India reuse single-use ('disposable') endoscopic biopsy forceps due to the cost of these forceps and the perceived low risk of infection transmission on reuse. Low-cost single-use biopsy forceps are now available in India, bringing into question the justification for such a practice. We aimed to determine the type of forceps (single-use or reused) patients would prefer during endoscopy for themselves, whether this is dependent on cost, and what cost would be acceptable to them. METHODS: Among patients (conveniently selected from indoor or outdoor) reporting for endoscopy at the division of gastroenterology at a private tertiary-level hospital, we distributed an information sheet about the survey 30-45 minutes before the procedure. After they completed reading the sheet, an endoscopy nurse and/or doctor explained the study. The patient then completed a questionnaire of multiple choices with tick boxes. RESULTS: Of 151 patients approached, 4 declined to participate. Of 147 patients surveyed (age range 16-83 years; 82 men), 127 (86.4%) preferred single-use forceps, 16 (10.9%) preferred reused forceps, and 4 (2.7%) could not decide and left the decision to the physician. When informed that single-use forceps may be available for about ₹1000 (approximately US$ 15), 131 patients (89.1%) preferred these forceps, 11 (7.4%) preferred reused forceps, and 5 (3.4%) could not decide. Forty-four patients (33.1%) stated that an acceptable cost for a forceps for them would be ₹500 (approximately US$ 8), for 65 patients (48.9%) patients it was ₹1000, and for 24 (18.1%) it was ₹1500. CONCLUSION: About 90% of patients in this survey preferred single-use forceps; a cost of ₹1000 for single-use forceps was acceptable to over two-thirds of them.

[Use of Reusable Textile Undergloves for Medical Procedures: A Feasibility Study]. / Einsatz wiederaufbereitbarer textiler Unterziehhandschuhe für medizinische Tätigkeiten: eine Machbarkeitsstudie.

OBJECTIVE: Undergloves are a way to reduce moisture-related skin damage. The aim of this feasibility study was to gain experience with logistics, applicability, acceptability and cost of the routine use of reusable textile undergloves in a hospital setting. METHODS: Undergloves were tested with 18 health-care workers on an intensive care unit over three months. Data on usage as well as logistics were recorded. At baseline, personal data and knowledge and use of cotton undergloves, existing skin problems and the nursing behaviour of the hands by the subjects were determined by means of an input questionnaire. After each wearing, data on usage were collected by a questionnaire. Participants were interviewed by means of a questionnaire with respect to their experience with the use of the undergloves. RESULTS: Acceptance and compliance with the use of undergloves was remarkably good. This was partly due to the properties of the gloves, and partly to the reduction of sweating and very positive effect on the skin of the hands. In the study period 2165 underglove uses were documented, resulting in an average daily consumption of four pairs per person per day. The average wearing time was 28.6 min. The undergloves were suitable for application as well as reprocessing. Reprocessment-related fatigue was relatively low and did not lead to the loss of the properties, only few gloves had to be sorted out. Even if one assumes a complete write-off of the gloves with end of the study, costs for reprocessing were about 0.46 € or 64 % less than the single use. CONCLUSION: The routine use of textile, reprocessable undergloves is feasible. Major challenges for broad usage are within logistics and acceptance by the user.

Cobalt, linac, or other: what is the best solution for radiation therapy in developing countries?

The international growth of cancer and lack of available treatment is en route to become a global crisis. With >60% of cancer patients needing radiation therapy at some point during their treatment course, the lack of available facilities and treatment programs worldwide is extremely problematic. The number of deaths from treatable cancers is projected to increase to 11.5 million deaths in 2030 because the international population is aging and growing. In this review, we present how best to answer the need for radiation therapy facilities from a technical standpoint. Specifically, we examine whether cobalt teletherapy machines or megavoltage linear accelerator machines are best equipped to handle the multitudes in need of radiation therapy treatment in the developing world.

Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the durability and cost of maintenance for outsourced, refurbished flexible ureteroscopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ureteroscope usage and repair were prospectively recorded over a 365-day period at a large 836-bed public hospital. Cases were performed by 14 different urologists using either refurbished DUR-8 or DUR-8 Elite model ureteroscopes. Retrograde cases involving calculi, urothelial carcinoma, stricture, and diagnostic evaluations were included. Ureteroscope repairs were performed by a single outsourced repair vendor, not the original manufacturer. RESULTS: A total of 501 ureteroscopic cases involving 550 ureteroscope usages were performed over a 365-day period. Semirigid ureteroscopes were used for 281 (56.1%) cases and refurbished flexible ureteroscopes for 220 (43.9%). The reason for the ureteroscopy was calculi in 386 (77.0%) cases, urothelial carcinoma in 32 (6.4%), stricture in 36 (7.2%), and diagnostic in 47 (9.4%). No repairs were needed during this period for semirigid scopes. Ureteral access sheaths were used in 82 (37.7%) of the cases. A total of 32 instances of catastrophic breakage occurred. Each newly refurbished ureteroscope was used for an average of 6.9 times before incurring further damage requiring repair. CONCLUSION: Refurbished flexible ureteroscopes that have undergone comprehensive repair are extremely fragile in the setting of multiple surgeon users in a large public hospital that uses central processing for sterilization and storage. This poor durability results in significant maintenance, repair, and administrative inconvenience that should be considered along with the purchase price.

A multi-country assessment of compliance with daily disposable contact lens wear.

PURPOSE: To investigate compliance with daily disposable contact lens (DDCL) wear and investigate re-use of lenses according to country and DDCL material worn. METHODS: Optometrists invited eligible DDCL patients from their practices to participate in a survey on DDCL wear in Australia, Norway, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). Eligible participants completed an online or paper version of the survey. RESULTS: 805 participants completed the survey (96% online): Australia 13%, Norway 32%, UK 17%, US 38%. The median age was 38 years; 66% were female. Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) DDCLs were worn by 14%. Overall, 9% were non-compliant with DDCL replacement; Australia 18%, US 12%, UK 7% and Norway 4%. There were no differences with respect to sex, years of contact lens wear experience or DDCL material (SiHy versus hydrogels). The primary reason for re-use was "to save money" (60%). Re-use of DDCLs resulted in inferior comfort at insertion and prior to lens removal (p=0.001). 75% reported occasional napping and 28% reported sleeping overnight for at least one night in the preceding month, while wearing their DDCLs. CONCLUSION: Non-compliance with replacement of DDCLs occurred in all countries investigated; the rate was highest in Australia and lowest in Norway. Re-use of DDCLs was associated with reduced comfort. DDCL wearers often reported wearing lenses overnight. It is important for optometrists to counsel their patients on the importance of appropriate lens wear and replacement for DDCLs.

Pacemaker reuse for patients in resource poor countries: is something always better than nothing?

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death across the globe. Large disparities in access to cardiovascular care exist in the world. An estimated one million people die each year due to lack of access to life saving pacemaker therapy. We discuss the concept of justice in health and health care as it relates to the use of refurbished pacemakers in patients in low- and middle- income countries, where financial circumstances severely limit access to brand new devices. Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and justice as fairness are examined, as they relate to provision of re-processed pacemakers. This practice, since it holds promise to improve human functioning and capabilities, can be morally justified with some conditions: transparency, further research in is its safety and efficacy, and its impact on other needs and priorities in those countries.

Reuse of single-use devices: looking back, looking forward.

The reuse of medical devices marked as 'single use' by manufacturers has been going on for several decades. The process has been rationalized and legislated in the West as well as in Japan. However, the practice continues in an unregulated manner in India due to a paucity of guidance from the Food and Drug Administration in India. We trace the evolution of reuse policies, look at the prevalent practices in the Indian and international contexts, analyse the available Indian literature and address the ethical and economic implications of reuse. We also suggest some guidelines which may be adopted to formulate policies.

A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.

BACKGROUND: For most items used in operating rooms, it is unclear whether reusable items are environmentally and financially advantageous in comparison with single-use variants. We examined the life cycles of reusable and single-use central venous catheter kits used to aid the insertion of single-use, central venous catheters in operating rooms. We did not examine the actual disposable catheter sets themselves. We assessed the entire financial and environmental costs for the kits, including the influence of the energy source used for sterilization. METHODS: For the reusable central venous catheter kit, we performed a "time-in-motion" study to determine the labor costs and measured the energy and water consumption for cleaning and sterilization at Western Health, Melbourne, Australia. For the majority of the inputs for the single-use kit, we relied upon industry and inventory-sourced databases. We modeled the life cycles of the reusable and single-use central venous catheter kits with Monte Carlo analysis. RESULTS: Inclusive of labor, the reusable central venous catheter insertion kits cost $6.35 Australian ($A) (95% confidence interval [CI], $A5.89 to $A6.86), and the single-use kits cost $A8.65. For the reusable kit, CO(2) emissions were 1211 g (95% CI, 1099 to 1323 g) and for the single-use kit 407 g (95% CI, 379 to 442 g). Water use was 27.7 L (95% CI, 27.0 to 28.6 l) for the reusable kit and 2.5 L (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.9 l) for the single-use kit. For the reusable kit, sterilization had the greatest environmental cost, and for the single-use kit, the manufacture of plastic and metal components had the largest environmental costs. Different sources of electricity to make the reusable kits patient-ready again affected the CO(2) emissions: electricity from hospital gas cogeneration resulted in 436 g CO(2) (95% CI, 410 to 473 g CO(2)), from the United States electricity grid 764 g CO(2) (95% CI, 509 to 1174 g CO(2)), and from the European electricity grid 572 g (95% CI, 470 to 713 g CO(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusive of labor, the reusable central venous catheter insertion kits were less expensive than were the single-use kits. For our hospital, which uses brown coal-sourced electricity, the environmental costs of the reusable kit were considerably greater than those of the single-use kit. Efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of reusable items should be directed towards decreasing the water and energy consumed in cleaning and sterilization. The source of hospital electricity significantly alters the relative environmental effects of reusable items.

Reducing medical waste.

Medical waste is a necessary by-product of any hospital environment; however, the majority of regulated medical waste is produced in the OR from the use of disposable surgical supplies (eg, drapes, gowns, basins, gloves, sponges). We conducted a concept comparison project in the ORs of two large medical centers in Bethesda, Maryland, and Washington, DC, to evaluate the effects of using reusable surgical basins, gowns, and table and Mayo stand covers in place of disposable products. Survey results indicated that surgeons and surgical technologists found the reusable products to be preferable to the disposable products currently in use. In addition, using reusable products provided a means to decrease regulated medical waste generated in the OR by an average of 65% as well as reduce the cost of waste disposal. AORN recommends evaluating the environmental effects of using reusable, reposable, and disposable products; our findings provide evidence that may be useful to surgical facilities that seek to adopt a "green" approach.

"No one has ever asked for it back!" A survey assessing the fate of reusable external fixation equipment in mortuaries.

Technicians from one hundred and eighteen Human Tissue Authority (HTA) approved mortuaries licensed to perform post-mortems in England completed a telephone interview. All were questioned on whether they had contact with reusable external fixators, who was responsible for the removal, the number removed annually, and the destination of the fixator post-removal. Opinion was sought on how the return of the equipment could be better facilitated. Seventy-four of the technicians interviewed could remember seeing external fixation devices, but were unable to quantify how many were removed annually. Sixty-one of those questioned stated that they personally removed the fixator, three always requested an Orthopaedic surgeon to remove the device and five contacted a Nurse Specialist. Forty-eight stated that they returned the devices to their local Sterile Services Department or Orthopaedic department. Nine technicians always discarded the fixators, eight always left them with the body and two stored them in the mortuary. Many reusable external fixation devices are inappropriately disposed of each year due to a lack of knowledge and communication with Orthopaedic departments. Confusion also exists among some technicians over whether external fixation components should be treated as 'implants'. There is a need for clear guidelines to raise awareness and ensure the appropriate return of these high cost devices.

Coverage to curb the emerging HIV epidemic among injecting drug users in Pakistan: delivering prevention services where most needed.

BACKGROUND: HIV Surveillance data from IDUs is suggestive of an escalating epidemic in major cities of Pakistan. The relatively widespread presence and interlinking of IDU and high-risk sexual networks, combined with low levels of HIV knowledge and prevention methods, indicate that there is potential for a rapid spread of HIV to other high-risk groups and its further expansion to general population through bridging groups. METHODS: We reviewed Second Generation Surveillance data which provides mapping, biological and behavioural information from IDUs in eight major cities across Pakistan. Geographic mapping provided information about the location and size of the population, which was followed by a behavioural survey, conducted with a representative sample of 2432 IDUs. In addition, blood samples were also obtained which were tested for HIV. RESULTS: Despite availability of syringe and needle exchange programmes in larger cities, drug users continued to reuse syringes (78.1%), injected in groups (73.3%) where extensive sharing of needle and injecting paraphernalia took place (50%). 12.6% of the respondents reported to having sexual relationships with female sex workers and 14.7% had sex with males in the past 6 months. 65% never used condoms. In addition 5.3% reported exchange of sex for money and drugs. Fairly low levels of coverage were reported from most of the cities. CONCLUSION: Despite an existing nationwide harm reduction programme, increasing rates of HIV infection among IDUs underscore the need to identify gaps in the existing prevention strategy. Data available on coverage shows that effective harm reduction activities are unable to reach a substantial number of IDUs to actually avert or delay the emerging IDUs epidemic. There is an urgent need to expand coverage, and to integrate harm reduction in the mainstream of public health.