Single-photon absorption and emission from a natural photosynthetic complex.

Photosynthesis is generally assumed to be initiated by a single photon1-3 from the Sun, which, as a weak light source, delivers at most a few tens of photons per nanometre squared per second within a chlorophyll absorption band1. Yet much experimental and theoretical work over the past 40 years has explored the events during photosynthesis subsequent to absorption of light from intense, ultrashort laser pulses2-15. Here, we use single photons to excite under ambient conditions the light-harvesting 2 (LH2) complex of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, comprising B800 and B850 rings that contain 9 and 18 bacteriochlorophyll molecules, respectively. Excitation of the B800 ring leads to electronic energy transfer to the B850 ring in approximately 0.7 ps, followed by rapid B850-to-B850 energy transfer on an approximately 100-fs timescale and light emission at 850-875 nm (refs. 16-19). Using a heralded single-photon source20,21 along with coincidence counting, we establish time correlation functions for B800 excitation and B850 fluorescence emission and demonstrate that both events involve single photons. We also find that the probability distribution of the number of heralds per detected fluorescence photon supports the view that a single photon can upon absorption drive the subsequent energy transfer and fluorescence emission and hence, by extension, the primary charge separation of photosynthesis. An analytical stochastic model and a Monte Carlo numerical model capture the data, further confirming that absorption of single photons is correlated with emission of single photons in a natural light-harvesting complex.

Proton-transfer pathways in photosynthetic reaction centers analyzed by profile hidden markov models and network calculations.

In the bacterial reaction center (bRC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the key residues of proton transfer to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) are known. Also, several possible proton entry points and proton-transfer pathways have been proposed. However, the mechanism of the proton transfer to Q(B) remains unclear. The proton transfer to Q(B) in the bRC of Blastochloris viridis is less explored. To analyze whether the bRCs of different species use the same key residues for proton transfer to Q(B), we determined the conservation of these residues. We performed a multiple-sequence alignment based on profile hidden Markov models. Residues involved in proton transfer but not located at the protein surface are conserved or are only exchanged to functionally similar amino acids, whereas potential proton entry points are not conserved to the same extent. The analysis of the hydrogen-bond network of the bRC from R. sphaeroides and that from B. viridis showed that a large network connects Q(B) with the cytoplasmic region in both bRCs. For both species, all non-surface key residues are part of the network. However, not all proton entry points proposed for the bRC of R. sphaeroides are included in the network in the bRC of B. viridis. From our analysis, we could identify possible proton entry points. These proton entry points differ between the two bRCs. Together, the results of the conservation analysis and the hydrogen-bond network analysis make it likely that the proton transfer to Q(B) is not mediated by distinct pathways but by a large hydrogen-bond network.

Profile hidden Markov models for analyzing similarities and dissimilarities in the bacterial reaction center and photosystem II.

The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center is the evolutionary ancestor of the Photosystem II reaction center. These proteins share the same fold and perform the same biological function. Nevertheless, the details of their molecular reaction mechanism differ. It is of significant biological and biochemical interest to determine which functional characteristics are conserved at the level of the protein sequences. Since the level of sequence identity between the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center and Photosystem II is low, a progressive multiple-sequence alignment leads to errors in identifying the conserved residues. In such a situation, profile hidden Markov models (pHMM) can be used to obtain reliable multiple-sequence alignments. We therefore constructed the pHMM with the help of a sequence alignment based on a structural superposition of both proteins. To validate the multiple-sequence alignments obtained with the pHMM, the conservation of residues with known functional importance was examined. Having confirmed the correctness of the multiple-sequence alignments, we analyzed the conservation of residues involved in hydrogen bonding and redox potential tuning of the cofactors. Our analysis reveals similarities and dissimilarities between the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center and Photosystem II at the protein sequence level, hinting at different charge separation and charge transfer mechanisms. The conservation analysis that we perform in this paper can be considered as a model for analyzing the conservation in proteins with a low level of sequence identity.

Protein shape and crowding drive domain formation and curvature in biological membranes.

Folding, curvature, and domain formation are characteristics of many biological membranes. Yet the mechanisms that drive both curvature and the formation of specialized domains enriched in particular protein complexes are unknown. For this reason, studies in membranes whose shape and organization are known under physiological conditions are of great value. We therefore conducted atomic force microscopy and polarized spectroscopy experiments on membranes of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. These membranes are densely populated with peripheral light harvesting (LH2) complexes, physically and functionally connected to dimeric reaction center-light harvesting (RC-LH1-PufX) complexes. Here, we show that even when converting the dimeric RC-LH1-PufX complex into RC-LH1 monomers by deleting the gene encoding PufX, both the appearance of protein domains and the associated membrane curvature are retained. This suggests that a general mechanism may govern membrane organization and shape. Monte Carlo simulations of a membrane model accounting for crowding and protein geometry alone confirm that these features are sufficient to induce domain formation and membrane curvature. Our results suggest that coexisting ordered and fluid domains of like proteins can arise solely from asymmetries in protein size and shape, without the need to invoke specific interactions. Functionally, coexisting domains of different fluidity are of enormous importance to allow for diffusive processes to occur in crowded conditions.

Calculated protein and proton motions coupled to electron transfer: electron transfer from QA- to QB in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers.

Reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were subjected to Monte Carlo sampling to determine the Boltzmann distribution of side-chain ionization states and positions and buried water orientation and site occupancy. Changing the oxidation states of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer electron donor (P) and primary (QA) and secondary (QB) quinone electron acceptors allows preparation of the ground (all neutral), P+QA-, P+QB-, P0QA-, and P0QB- states. The calculated proton binding going from ground to other oxidation states and the free energy of electron transfer from QA-QB to form QAQB- (DeltaGAB) compare well with experiment from pH 5 to pH 11. At pH 7 DeltaGAB is measured as -65 meV and calculated to be -80 meV. With fixed protein positions as in standard electrostatic calculations, DeltaGAB is +170 meV. At pH 7 approximately 0.2 H+/protein is bound on QA reduction. On electron transfer to QB there is little additional proton uptake, but shifts in side chain protonation and position occur throughout the protein. Waters in channels leading from QB to the surface change site occupancy and orientation. A cluster of acids (GluL212, AspL210, and L213) and SerL223 near QB play important roles. A simplified view shows this cluster with a single negative charge (on AspL213 with a hydrogen bond to SerL233) in the ground state. In the QB- state the cluster still has one negative charge, now on the more distant AspL210. AspL213 and SerL223 move so SerL223 can hydrogen bond to QB-. These rearrangements plus other changes throughout the protein make the reaction energetically favorable.