Atosiban versus betamimetics in the treatment of preterm labour in Italy: clinical and economic importance of side-effects.

The aim of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of atosiban compared to betamimetics in the treatment of preterm labour within the Italian setting. A systematic literature review identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing atosiban with betamimetics. Meta-analysis of nine RCTs determined that atosiban and betamimetics had similar efficacy in delaying preterm birth by at least 48 h (p=0.910). Use of atosiban was associated with significantly fewer adverse events (p<0.008). Results demonstrate that atosiban is cost-saving versus ritodrine or isoxuprine. Atosiban cost savings are €657 per patient from the National Health Service payer's perspective; €299 at 18 h of tocolysis to €189 at 48 h from the hospital's perspective. The respective values versus isoxuprine were €303 and €199. From the combined perspective, using atosiban versus ritodrine saved from €425 to €316; and versus isoxuprine from €429 to €326. Owing to its superior safety profile, atosiban is cost-saving versus betamimetics in the treatment of preterm labour in Italy from the payer's, hospital's and combined perspectives. With the approximate 40,000 annual preterm births in Italy the annual savings could be in excess of €13 million for the payer or €3.8-6.2 million for the hospitals.

The influence of tocolytic drugs on cardiac function, large arteries, and resistance vessels.

PURPOSE: Beta-2 adrenoceptor agonistic drugs like ritodrine have been the reference tocolytic drugs, but are associated with cardiovascular side-effects. Atosiban, a newer drug, is a competitive antagonist of oxytocin and has been claimed to have fewer cardiovascular side effects. Until now, there has mainly been a subjective reporting of adverse reactions and few objective cardiovascular data. Evaluation of the acute effects of therapeutic doses of ritodrine and atosiban compared with placebo on cardiac function, large artery properties, blood pressure, and resistance vessels. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized trial was carried out in 20 non-pregnant female volunteers. Hemodynamic measurements were made under standardized conditions during kinetic steady state. Cardiac output was measured with echocardiography, large artery properties with an echo-tracking device. The effect on the microcirculation was estimated using the total peripheral resistance index (TPRI). RESULTS: Atosiban did not differ from placebo. With ritodrine, cardiac function increased by 79% compared with placebo because of a rise in heart rate (91%). TPRI decreased by 48%. Ritodrine increased the distensibility of the common carotid artery by 62% and the compliance by 83%, independent of blood pressure. Compliance of the common femoral artery increased independently of pressure by 33% and the distensibility by 59%. Aortic pulse wave velocity was not influenced by either medication. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows potential beneficial vascular effects of ritodrine that are counterbalanced by the cardiac effects. Atosiban has no clinically relevant cardiovascular effects and may be a good alternative for ritodrine in pregnant women at risk of cardiovascular complications.

Tocolytic therapy: a meta-analysis and decision analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal first-line tocolytic agent for treatment of premature labor. METHODS: We performed a quantitative analysis of randomized controlled trials of tocolysis, extracting data on maternal and neonatal outcomes, and pooling rates for each outcome across trials by treatment. Outcomes were delay of delivery for 48 hours, 7 days, and until 37 weeks; adverse effects causing discontinuation of therapy; absence of respiratory distress syndrome; and neonatal survival. We used weighted proportions from a random-effects meta-analysis in a decision model to determine the optimal first-line tocolytic therapy. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the standard errors of the weighted proportions. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis showed that all tocolytic agents were superior to placebo or control groups at delaying delivery both for at least 48 hours (53% for placebo compared with 75-93% for tocolytics) and 7 days (39% for placebo compared with 61-78% for tocolytics). No statistically significant differences were found for the other outcomes, including the neonatal outcomes of respiratory distress and neonatal survival. The decision model demonstrated that prostaglandin inhibitors provided the best combination of tolerance and delayed delivery. In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 women receiving prostaglandin inhibitors, only 80 would deliver within 48 hours, compared with 182 for the next-best treatment. CONCLUSION: Although all current tocolytic agents were superior to no treatment at delaying delivery for both 48 hours and 7 days, prostaglandin inhibitors were superior to the other agents and may be considered the optimal first-line agent before 32 weeks of gestation to delay delivery.

Cost-effectiveness of ritodrine and fenoterol for treatment of preterm labor in a low-middle-income country: a case study.

OBJECTIVES: In countries with high income, tocolytic therapy with beta-mimetic agents is a cost-effective strategy compared to placebo. In our study, the cost-effectiveness of two beta-mimetic agents, ritodrine and fenoterol, used in the management of preterm labor was compared in the setting of a low-middle-income transitional country, Serbia & Montenegro. METHODS: This case study was conducted at the Gynecology-Obstetrics Clinic, Clinical Center "Kragujevac," in Kragujevac, Serbia & Montenegro, between October 2004 and January 2006. In total, 235 pregnant patients with threatened preterm labor were enrolled, but 35 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 200 patients, 85 were given ritodrine, and 115 fenoterol. The perspective of Republic Institute for Health Insurance in Serbia was taken into account. Only direct costs were calculated; primary outcomes of the study were length of pregnancy (in weeks), time passed from the onset of uterine contractions to delivery (in weeks), and score on modified Flanagan's quality-of-life scale for chronic diseases, measured after discharge from hospital. RESULTS: Prolongation of pregnancy was significantly longer in the fenoterol group (12.7 +/- 8.4 weeks) than in the ritodrine group (11.6 +/- 7.1 weeks). The mean duration of hospitalization was shorter in the fenoterol group (11.9 +/- 8.8 days) than in the ritodrine group (14.9 +/- 11.3 days). The treatment with fenoterol was less costly and more cost-effective than the treatment with ritodrine, but the difference in cost-effectiveness was not statistically significant. The cost of treatment per gained week of pregnancy prolongation was 3345.51 +/- 7668.04 CSD in the fenoterol group, and 4181.96 +/- 12,069.83 CSD in the ritodrine group. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in treatment costs and duration of hospitalization per patient did not translate into significant differences in cost-effectiveness ratios, because of low costs of hospitalization and human labor in Serbian health system. Nevertheless, fenoterol treatment still has a tendency to be more cost-effective, and its lower acquisition cost is an advantage to this treatment option.

Repeated administration of low-dose lipopolysaccharide induces preterm delivery in mice: a model for human preterm parturition and for assessment of the therapeutic ability of drugs against preterm delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to establish a new animal model for human preterm delivery for assessment of the protective effect of drugs against preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: C3H/HeN, C3H/HeN, and BALB/c female mice impregnated by C3H/HeN, B6D2F1, and B6D2F1 male mice, respectively, were treated intraperitoneally with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (0 to 100 microgram/kg, single dose or repeated doses at 1- to 6-hour intervals) on days 12 through 17 of pregnancy. On day 15 of pregnancy, the C3H/HeN females that had been impregnated by B6D2F1 males and administered lipopolysaccharide were treated intraperitoneally with indomethacin (1000 microgram/kg), ritodrine hydrochloride (1000 microgram/kg), urinary trypsin inhibitor (25 x 10(4) units/kg), or gabexate mesylate (100 mg/kg); preterm or term delivery was recorded for these mice. RESULTS: C3H/HeN females impregnated by B6D2F1 males revealed the highest (100%) incidence of preterm delivery when the females were treated with 50 microgram/kg lipopolysaccharide twice at a 3-hour interval on day 15 or 17 of pregnancy. Indomethacin and urinary trypsin inhibitor used separately significantly decreased the incidence of preterm delivery, but only urinary trypsin inhibitor, and not any of the other drugs, significantly increased the incidence of term delivery in the mice. CONCLUSION: A new animal model for investigation of preterm delivery was established, and its usefulness for assessment of the protective effect of drugs against preterm delivery was demonstrated.

Premature rupture of the membranes--aggressive versus conservative approach: effect of tocolytic and antibiotic therapy.

The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of tocolytic and antibiotic therapy in the prolongation of pregnancy and neonatal outcome in the treatment of premature rupture of the membranes without clinical labor. Delivery was delayed for 48 h, 7 days and beyond 35 weeks of gestation in 87, 39 and 18%, respectively, of patients in the treated group (n = 39) compared with 50, 12 and 17% of patients in the nontreated group (n = 42). The incidence of a low Apgar score (< 7 at 5 min), requiring artificial ventilation, and infectious morbidity was more common in the treated group than in the nontreated group (18 vs. 0, 41 vs. 17 and 39 vs. 17%, respectively). There was no significant cost difference in survivors between the treated and nontreated groups, although the mothers in the treated group were significantly more expensive. From these observations, it appears that tocolysis and antibiotics are not effective in PROM cases.

Efficacy and safety of indomethacin versus ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized study.

One hundred six patients in preterm labor with intact amniotic membranes and gestational age less than or equal to 32 weeks were randomized to receive either ritodrine hydrochloride or a 48-hour course of indomethacin for tocolysis. The relative efficacy, maternal and neonatal safety, and costs were evaluated to determine which may be the more appropriate first-line pharmacologic agent used to manage preterm labor. Fifty-four patients and 52 patients were randomized to receive ritodrine hydrochloride or indomethacin, respectively. Ritodrine hydrochloride and indomethacin were equally effective in inhibiting uterine contractions and delaying delivery. Delivery was delayed for at least 48 hours in 83 and 94%, and for at least 7 days in 70 and 75% of patients receiving ritodrine or indomethacin, respectively. Tocolysis with indomethacin was associated with no maternal side effects, whereas tocolysis with ritodrine hydrochloride was associated with a 24% incidence of serious cardiovascular and metabolic adverse effects prompting discontinuation of the drug. There were no differences in outcome between the infants exposed to indomethacin versus ritodrine hydrochloride when delivered either remote from therapy or during therapy, except for a statistically higher serum glucose in the infants exposed to ritodrine hydrochloride when delivered during tocolytic therapy. There were no cases of premature closure of the ductus arteriosus or pulmonary hypertension. Tocolysis with indomethacin was 17 times less costly than tocolysis with ritodrine hydrochloride. For gestations less than or equal to 32 weeks complicated by preterm labor, indomethacin may be an appropriate alternative as a first-line tocolytic agent.

The therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aggressive tocolysis for premature labor associated with premature rupture of the membranes.

We conducted a randomized trial comparing bed rest with tocolysis to determine the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of tocolysis for the treatment of preterm labor after membrane rupture. One hundred nine women participated over a 26-month interval. Treatment groups did not differ significantly in terms of gestational age at membrane rupture, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, maternal or fetal infectious morbidity, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, or perinatal mortality. Prolongation of intrauterine time after the onset of uterine contractions was seen in women receiving tocolysis (105.2 +/- 157 hours versus 62.1 +/- 77 hours, p = 0.06). This prolongation was not associated with a significant reduction in the total cost per surviving infant (tocolysis, $38,593 +/- $40,887 versus bed rest, $43,158 +/- $37,116; p = 0.445). The cost difference was artifactual. The number of very premature infants born (less than 28 weeks' gestation) was unequal in the two groups (12 in the bed rest group and 5 in the tocolysis group) and skewed the results. Before 28 weeks' gestation tocolysis was associated with a significant increase in intrauterine time after the onset of regular contractions (p = 0.05). However, there was no identifiable perinatal benefit garnered from the additional 5 days. After 28 weeks there were no significant differences between treatment groups in terms of intrauterine time after the onset of regular contractions and total cost per surviving infant. Because tocolysis does not improve perinatal outcome and can itself be associated with major maternal morbidity, it should be avoided after 28 weeks' gestation. Before 28 weeks' gestation tocolysis may greatly increase intrauterine time, but the benefit of this prolongation is not clear.

Prolonged use of tocolytic agents in the expectant management of placenta previa.

The effects of the prolonged use (greater than seven days) of tocolytic agents, along with other established procedures of conservative, expectant management, were studied in 45 patients with either total or marginal-partial placenta previa. Our regimen prolonged pregnancy for seven days or more in 81.2% of total placenta previas and 91.7% of marginal-partial ones. Antepartum hospitalization and shortened neonatal length of stay resulted in a total saving of $18,175 per case. The prolonged use of tocolytic agents, in addition to expectant management, in patients with placenta previa increased the length of pregnancy, decreased neonatal morbidity and was cost effective.

Retrospective analysis of the effects of ritodrine and terbutaline in the management of preterm labor.

The tocolytic effects, adverse reactions, cost, and duration of therapy of terbutaline and ritodrine used for treating preterm labor were compared using retrospective chart review. Of 614 pregnant women admitted to an obstetrics unit between May 1980 and June 1981 who did not deliver a child during that admission, 48 remained on the unit more than 12 hours, received a tocolytic agent, and had a diagnosis of preterm labor. Of these, 22 women received terbutaline or ritodrine. Eight women were excluded, leaving 14 women in the study group. Maternal and fetal characteristics were tabulated, and patients exposed to terbutaline (seven mothers and seven babies) and ritodrine (seven mothers and eight babies) were compared. There were no significant differences between the terbutaline and ritodrine groups for maternal or fetal characteristics, efficacy of treatment, adverse effects, or duration of therapy. The cost of terbutaline is substantially less than that of ritodrine. Terbutaline and ritodrine appear to be comparable tocolytic agents clinically. The use of terbutaline should be investigated further in view of its lower cost and comparable clinical effects.