Prenatal opioid exposure by likelihood of exposure and risk to prenatal development: Medicaid-covered births in Wisconsin, 2010-2019.

Prenatal opioid exposure is an established public health problem, in particular among Medicaid-covered births. Yet, existing prevalence rates are plausibly underestimated. We leverage extensive linked longitudinal administrative data for all Medicaid-covered live births in Wisconsin from 2010 to 2019 to estimate a range of prevalence rates using an innovative strategy that jointly accounts for both likelihood of exposure and potential risk to prenatal development. We find that 20.8% of infants may have been prenatally exposed to opioids, with 1.7% diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome and an additional 1.2% having a high combined likelihood of exposure and potential risk to prenatal development, 2.6% a moderate combined likelihood and risk, and 15.3% a low or uncertain combined likelihood and risk. We assess improvements in prevalence estimates based on our nuanced classification relative to those of prior studies. Our strategy could be broadly used to quantify the scope of the opioid crisis for pregnant populations, target interventions, and promote child health and development.

Cost of Care for Newborns With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in a State Medicaid Program.

Importance: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a medical condition among neonates experiencing substance withdrawal due to the mother's substance use during pregnancy. While previous studies suggest that the overall incidence and annual costs of NAS are increasing, to date, the long-term costs have yet to be demonstrated in Medicaid populations. Objective: To examine the demographic differences and long-term costs of care for neonates diagnosed with vs not diagnosed with NAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used claims data from the Alabama Medicaid Agency for neonates born to Medicaid-eligible mothers between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed in June 2022. Exposure: A diagnosis of NAS within 30 days of birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of NAS by demographic and birth characteristics, long-term costs attributable to NAS status and demographic and birth characteristics, and distribution of this expenditure over the enrollment period. Results: A total of 346 259 neonates with Medicaid eligibility were born during the study period (mean [SD] gestational age, 38.4 [2.2] weeks; 50.5%, male), 4027 (1.2%) of whom had an NAS diagnosis within 30 days of birth. A larger percentage of neonates with an NAS diagnosis were male (52.7%) than in the group without NAS (50.5%). Neonates with NAS also weighed less at birth (mean difference, -212.0 g; 95% CI, -231.1 to -192.8 g) and had older mothers (mean difference, 3.4 years; 95% CI, 2.6-4.2 years). An NAS diagnosis had an estimated additional cost of $17 921 (95% CI, $14 830-$21 012) over the enrollment period, and this cost was not evenly distributed over that period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of neonates born into the Alabama Medicaid population, those with an NAS diagnosis had a different demographic profile and a higher cost to state Medicaid agencies than those without NAS. These findings warrant further effort to reduce the occurrence of NAS.

Maternal opioid use disorder and infant mortality in Wisconsin, United States, 2010-2018.

OBJECTIVE: The difference in infant health outcomes by maternal opioid use disorder (OUD) status is understudied. We measured the association between maternal OUD during pregnancy and infant mortality and investigated whether this association differs by infant neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) or maternal receipt of medication for OUD (MOUD) during pregnancy. METHODS: We sampled 204,543 Medicaid-paid births from Wisconsin, United States (2010-2018). The primary exposure was any maternal OUD during pregnancy. We also stratified this exposure on NOWS diagnosis (no OUD; OUD without NOWS; OUD with NOWS) and on maternal MOUD receipt (no OUD; OUD without MOUD; OUD with <90 consecutive days of MOUD; OUD with 90+ consecutive days of MOUD). Our outcome was infant mortality (death at age <365 days). Demographic-adjusted logistic regressions measured associations with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Maternal OUD was associated with increased odds of infant mortality (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.02). After excluding infants who died <5 days post-birth (i.e., before the clinical presentation of NOWS), regression estimates of infant mortality did not significantly differ by NOWS diagnosis. Likewise, regression estimates did not significantly differ by maternal MOUD receipt in the full sample. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal OUD is associated with an elevated risk of infant mortality without evidence of modification by NOWS nor by maternal MOUD treatment. Future research should investigate potential mechanisms linking maternal OUD, NOWS, MOUD treatment, and infant mortality to better inform clinical intervention.

Health Services Use Among Children With Prenatal Substance Exposure or Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Infants with prenatal substance exposure or neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) use health services more often than other children; however, little is known about their use of mental health services and psychotropic medication. METHODS: The sample (N=1,004,085) consisted of infants born in 2016 in 38 states who were followed through the fifth year of life and enrolled each year in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program. Infants with prenatal substance exposure or NAS were identified with ICD-10 diagnosis codes; procedure and revenue codes documented their service use. RESULTS: Rates of any mental health visit and of psychotropic medication use were higher among infants with prenatal substance exposure or NAS compared with infants without either condition; these patterns persisted during most years of the 5-year study. CONCLUSIONS: Infants' elevated mental health services use through their first 5 years of life highlights the importance of early screening and subsequent engagement in school-based mental health interventions.

Trends in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome and Opioid Exposure Diagnoses Among Infants With Private Health Insurance, 2016-2021: Introduction of the P04.14 ICD-10-CM Code.

OBJECTIVE: The opioid epidemic has led to a surge in diagnoses of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Many states track the incidence of NOWS by using the P96.1 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) code for "neonatal withdrawal symptoms from maternal use of drugs of addiction." In October 2018, an ICD-10-CM code for neonatal opioid exposure (P04.14) was introduced. This code can be used when an infant is exposed to opioids in utero but does not have clinically significant withdrawal symptoms. We analyzed the effect of the P04.14 code on the incidence rate of NOWS (P96.1) and "other" neonatal drug exposure diagnoses (P04.49). METHODS: We used private health insurance data collected for infants in the United States from the first quarter of 2016 through the third quarter of 2021 to describe incidence rates for each code over time and examine absolute and percentage changes before and after the introduction of code P04.14. RESULTS: The exclusive use of code P96.1 declined from an incidence rate per 1000 births of 1.08 in 2016-2018 to 0.70 in 2019-2021, a -35.7% (95% CI, -47.6% to -23.8%) reduction. Use of code P04.49 only declined from an incidence rate of 2.34 in 2016-2018 to 1.64 in 2019-2021, a -30.0% (95% CI, -36.4% to -23.7%) reduction. Use of multiple codes during the course of treatment increased from an average incidence per 1000 births of 0.56 in 2016-2018 to 0.79 in 2019-2021, a 45.5% (95% CI, 24.8%-66.1%) increase. CONCLUSION: The introduction of ICD-10-CM code P04.14 altered the use of other neonatal opioid exposure codes. The use of multiple codes increased, indicating that some ambiguity may exist about which ICD-10-CM code is most appropriate for a given set of symptoms.

Prenatal Substance Exposure and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: State Estimates from the 2016-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System.

INTRODUCTION: Estimating Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and prenatal substance exposure rates in Medicaid can help target program efforts to improve access to services. METHODS: The data for this study was extracted from the 2016-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) Research Identifiable Files (RIF) and included infants born between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 with a either a NAS diagnosis or prenatal substance exposure. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, the estimated national rate of NAS experienced a 18% decline, while the estimated national rate of prenatal substance exposure experienced a 3.6% increase. At the state level in 2020, the NAS rate ranged from 3.2 per 1000 births (Hawaii) to 68.0 per 1000 births (West Virginia). Between 2016 and 2020, 28 states experienced a decline in NAS births and 20 states had an increase in NAS rates. In 2020, the lowest prenatal substance exposure rate was observed in New Jersey (9.9 per 1000 births) and the highest in West Virginia (88.1 per 1000 births). Between 2016 and 2020, 38 states experienced an increase in the rate of prenatal substance exposure and 10 states experienced a decline. DISCUSSION: Estimated rate of NAS has declined nationally, but rate of prenatal substance exposure has increased, with considerable state-level variation. The reported increase in prenatal substance exposure in the majority of US states (38) suggest that substances other than opioids are influencing this trend. Medicaid-led initiatives can be used to identify women with substance use and connect them to services.

What is already known about the topic? Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and prenatal substance exposure are significant risk factors for poor neurodevelopmental and mental health outcomes in early childhood. NAS birth rates have been increasing in the US since 2000 and the majority of NAS births are covered by Medicaid.What this article adds? This article estimates national and state-level prenatal substance exposure and NAS rates among Medicaid-covered infants born between 2016-2020 using data from the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System. This is the first study using post-2017 data to estimate national NAS rates. The findings can inform future federal and state policy efforts to improve access to screening, diagnosis and treatment among pregnant women with substance use disorder and infants with NAS.

The Alberta Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Mother-Baby Care ImprovEmeNT (NASCENT) program: protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of a hospital-level Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome rooming-in intervention.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), a problem common in newborns exposed to substances in-utero, is an emerging health concern. In traditional models of care, infants with NAS are routinely separated from their mothers and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with long, expensive length of stay (LOS). Research shows a rooming-in approach (keeping mothers and infants together in hospital) with referral support is a safe and effective model of care in managing NAS. The model's key components are facilitating 24-h care by mothers on post-partum or pediatric units with support for breastfeeding, transition home, and access to Opioid Dependency Programs (ODP). This study will implement the rooming-in approach at eight hospitals across one Canadian Province; support practice and culture shift; identify and test the essential elements for effective implementation; and assess the implementation's impact/outcomes. METHODS: A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial will be used to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based rooming-in approach in the postpartum period for infants born to mothers who report opioid use during pregnancy. Baseline data will be collected and compared to post-implementation data. Six-month assessment of maternal and child health and an economic evaluation of cost savings will be conducted. Additionally, barriers and facilitators of the rooming-in model of care within the unique context of each site and across sites will be explored pre-, during, and post-implementation using theory-informed surveys, interviews, and focus groups with care teams and parents. A formative evaluation will examine the complex contextual factors and conditions that influence readiness and sustainability and inform the design of tailored interventions to facilitate capacity building for effective implementation. DISCUSSION: The primary expected outcome is reduced NICU LOS. Secondary expected outcomes include decreased rates of pharmacological management of NAS and child apprehension, increased maternal ODP participation, and improved 6-month outcomes for mothers and infants. Moreover, the NASCENT program will generate the detailed, multi-site evidence needed to accelerate the uptake, scale, and spread of this evidence-based intervention throughout Alberta, leading to more appropriate and effective care and use of healthcare resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0522662. Registered February 4th, 2022.

Resource utilization and convalescent care cost in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is a growing public health problem associated with complex and prolonged medical care and a significant resource utilization burden. The objective of this study was to compare the cost of different convalescent care settings for infants with NOWS. METHODS: Retrospective comparison study of infants with NOWS discharged directly from NICU, transferred to an acute care pediatric floor (PPCU) or rehabilitation hospital (PRH). Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and cost of stay (COS). RESULTS: Infants had 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1,1.6) times and 2.5 (95% CI: 2.1,3.1) times significantly longer mean LOS for PPCU and RH discharges compared to NICU discharges. NICU discharged infants had the lowest mean COS ($25,745.00) and PRH the highest ($60,528.00), despite PRH having a lower cost per day. PRH discharged infants had higher rates of methadone and benzodiazepine and less buprenorphine exposure than NICU/PPCU discharged. Infants born to mothers on marijuana and buprenorphine had a 28% lower mean COS compared to unexposed infants. Median treatment cumulative morphine doses were six-fold higher for PRH than NICU discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Infants transferred to convalescence care facilities had longer and more costly admissions and received more medication. However, there may be a role for earlier transfer of a subset of infants at-risk for longer LOS as those exposed to methadone and/or benzodiazepines. Further studies exploring differences in resource utilization, convalescent care delivery and cost expenditure are recommended.

Newborn Cry Acoustics in the Assessment of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome Using Machine Learning.

Importance: The assessment of opioid withdrawal in the neonate, or neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), is problematic because current assessment methods are based on subjective observer ratings. Crying is a distinctive component of NOWS assessment tools and can be measured objectively using acoustic analysis. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using newborn cry acoustics (acoustics referring to the physical properties of sound) as an objective biobehavioral marker of NOWS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective controlled cohort study assessed whether acoustic analysis of neonate cries could predict which infants would receive pharmacological treatment for NOWS. A total of 177 full-term neonates exposed and not exposed to opioids were recruited from Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island between August 8, 2016, and March 18, 2020. Cry recordings were processed for 118 neonates, and 65 neonates were included in the final analyses. Neonates exposed to opioids were monitored for signs of NOWS using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool administered every 3 hours as part of a 5-day observation period during which audio was recorded continuously to capture crying. Crying of healthy neonates was recorded before hospital discharge during routine handling (eg, diaper changes). Exposures: The primary exposure was prenatal opioid exposure as determined by maternal receipt of medication-assisted treatment with methadone or buprenorphine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neonates were stratified by prenatal opioid exposure and receipt of pharmacological treatment for NOWS before discharge from the hospital. In total, 775 hours of audio were collected and trimmed into 2.5 hours of usable cries, then acoustically analyzed (using 2 separate acoustic analyzers). Cross-validated supervised machine learning methods (combining the Boruta algorithm and a random forest classifier) were used to identify relevant acoustic parameters and predict pharmacological treatment for NOWS. Results: Final analyses included 65 neonates (mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 36.6 [1.1] weeks; 36 [55.4%] female; 50 [76.9%] White) with usable cry recordings. Of those, 19 neonates received pharmacological treatment for NOWS, 7 neonates were exposed to opioids but did not receive pharmacological treatment for NOWS, and 39 healthy neonates were not exposed to opioids. The mean of the predictions of random forest classifiers predicted receipt of pharmacological treatment for NOWS with high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83-0.98]; accuracy, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74-0.92]; sensitivity, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.67-0.99]; specificity, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69-0.92]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, newborn acoustic cry analysis had potential as an objective measure of opioid withdrawal. These findings suggest that acoustic cry analysis using machine learning could improve the assessment, diagnosis, and management of NOWS and facilitate standardized care for these infants.

Assessment of the relative clinical utility of shortened Finnegan neonatal abstinence scoring tools.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proposed shortened tools based on the Finnegan neonatal abstinence scoring tool (FNAS) for relative clinical utility. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing shortened tools with FNAS on need for treatment, medication initiation cutoff score agreement, and length of treatment in 369 infants with prenatal opioid exposure using estimated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, Pearson and Spearman correlations, and proportion correctly classified, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The tools by Gomez et al. and Chervoneva et al. are most predictive of the FNAS cut-off values to initiate treatment, have cutoff values that best align with the FNAS cutoff values, and strongly correlate with the FNAS (r ≥ 0.88 corresponding to treatment initiation, r ≥ 0.83 during first 10 days of treatment). CONCLUSION: The tools of Gomez and Chervoneva demonstrated potential clinical usefulness by strongly associating with the need for treatment and monitoring the course of NAS therapy.

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in North Carolina: Incidence and Characteristics among Infants and Mothers.

BACKGROUND Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a complex disorder characterized by withdrawal symptoms secondary to in utero exposure to drugs capable of producing physical dependence. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of NAS, as well as infant and maternal characteristics associated with NAS in North Carolina (NC).METHODS This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study used the State Inpatient Database (SID) to compare the incidence rates of NAS for NC for the year 2016 to historical data (years 2000 to 2013). A multivariable logistic regression model including available covariates of interest was constructed.RESULTS Overall NAS incidence rate (IR) for NC was found to be 9.7 per 1,000 live births, a 32.3-fold increase since 2000 (IR=0.3 in 2000). The multivariable logistic regression model suggested race group (both black [OR 0.11; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.16] and 'other' [OR 0.43; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.61] vs white), ethnicity [OR 0.43; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.61], insurance group (both 'other/self-pay' [OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.52] and 'private insurance' [OR 0.07; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.10] vs Medicaid/Medicare), region (Piedmont [OR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79] vs Mountain), income quartile (both 4th [OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.79] and 3rd [OR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.96] vs 1st), county population size (50k-249k [OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.86] vs ≥1 million), birth weight [OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.98], and length of stay [OR 1.23; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.26] as potentially important predictors of NAS.LIMITATIONS Only hospitals providing data to the SID for 2016 were included and ICD-9 codes, in use at the time of data collection, were used.CONCLUSIONS The incidence of NAS has increased in NC in 2016 compared to prior years spanning back to 2000. Specific infant and maternal characteristics including race, ethnicity, payer type, geographic region, county population, parental income status, birth weight, and length appear to be associated with an infant bearing the diagnosis of NAS.

Association between punitive policies and neonatal abstinence syndrome among Medicaid-insured infants in complex policy environments.

AIMS: To estimate the association between punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy and odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosis among Medicaid-insured infants, and to estimate this association controlling for the presence of four other policies related to substance use in pregnancy. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of live births in Medicaid claims data from 39 US states in varying years between 2006 and 2014 using weighted generalized linear models with clustered standard errors and state and year fixed-effects. MEASUREMENTS: NAS rates in states without punitive policies were compared with rates in states with policies before and after policy enactment using logistic regression models adjusted for individual and county-level factors and including state and year fixed-effects. We estimated odds of NAS controlling for the presence of a potentially treatment-deterring policy requiring reporting of suspected prenatal substance use, and three treatment-supportive policies that create targeted programs for pregnant and postpartum women, prioritize pregnant women's access to substance use disorder treatment programs and prohibit discrimination towards pregnant women in treatment programs. FINDINGS: Among 9 714 798 weighted live births (1 896 082 unweighted), 49 670 (0.51%) had an NAS diagnosis. The findings were inconclusive as to whether or not punitive policies were associated with odds of NAS either in the short or long term. Odds of NAS among infants born in states with reporting policies were lower than those born in states without such policies [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.98]. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy do not appear to be associated with lower odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Reporting policies, which are heterogenous in their components and implementation, appear to be associated with lower odds of NAS when controlling for other relevant policies.

Trajectories of Prescription Opioid Utilization During Pregnancy Among Prepregnancy Chronic Users and Risk of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.

Little is known about the impact of dose, duration, and timing of prenatal prescription opioid exposure on the risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Using a cohort of 18,869 prepregnancy chronic opioid users nested within the 2000-2014 Medicaid Analytic eXtract, we assessed average opioid dosage within biweekly gestational age intervals, created group-based trajectory models, and evaluated the association between trajectory groups and NOWS risk. Women were grouped into 6 distinct opioid use trajectories which, based on observed patterns, were categorized as 1) continuous very low-dose use, 2) continuous low-dose use, 3) initial moderate-dose use with a gradual decrease to very low-dose/no use, 4) initial high-dose use with a gradual decrease to very low-dose use, 5) continuous moderate-dose use, and 6) continuous high-dose use. Absolute risk of NOWS per 1,000 infants was 7.7 for group 1 (reference group), 28.8 for group 2 (relative risk (RR) = 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8, 5.0), 16.5 for group 3 (RR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5, 3.1), 64.9 for group 4 (RR = 8.4, 95% CI: 5.6, 12.6), 77.3 for group 5 (RR = 10.0, 95% CI: 7.5, 13.5), and 172.4 for group 6 (RR = 22.4, 95% CI: 16.1, 31.2). Trajectory models-which capture information on dose, duration, and timing of exposure-are useful for gaining insight into clinically relevant groupings to evaluate the risk of prenatal opioid exposure.

Cost effectiveness of buprenorphine vs. methadone for pregnant people with opioid use disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of buprenorphine versus methadone in the management of opioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy. METHODS: We designed a decision-analytic model to evaluate the costs and outcomes associated with buprenorphine compared to methadone for pregnant people with OUD. We used a theoretical cohort of 22,400 pregnant people, which is an estimation of pregnancies affected by OUD per year in the United States. Outcomes included maternal retention in maintenance treatment, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, cerebral palsy, and maternal overdose in addition to cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We used a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. All model inputs were derived from the literature and varied in sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our baseline inputs. RESULTS: In our theoretical cohort, treatment of OUD with buprenorphine during pregnancy resulted in 2413 fewer cases of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, 1089 fewer preterm births, 299 fewer cases of fetal growth restriction, 32 fewer stillbirths, and 13 fewer cases of cerebral palsy compared to methadone treatment. Despite lower rates of retention, buprenorphine treatment saved nearly 123 million healthcare dollars and resulted in 558 additional QALYs, making it the dominant strategy compared to methadone treatment. Our findings were robust over a wide range of assumptions. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that buprenorphine should be considered a cost effective treatment option for OUD in pregnancy, as it is associated with improved neonatal outcomes compared to methadone despite the risk of treatment discontinuation.

Estimating the impact of neonatal abstinence system interventions on Medicaid: an incremental cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) incidence has significantly increased in the US in recent years. It is therefore important to develop effective intervention protocols that mitigate the long-term consequences of this condition for the mother, her child, and the community. METHODS: We used Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the impact of four interventions for NAS and their combinations on pregnant women with opioid use disorder. The key outputs were changes in incremental costs from baseline from the Medicaid perspective and from a total systems perspective and effect size changes. Simulation parameters and costs were based on the literature and baseline model validation was performed using Medicaid claims for Indiana. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, the resulting simulation estimates showed that three interventions significantly decreased Medicaid incremental costs by 8% (mandatory opioid testing (MOT)), 4% (patient navigators), and 3% (peer recovery coaches). The combination of the three interventions reduced Medicaid direct costs by 26%. Reductions were similar for total system incremental costs (ranging from 2 to 24%), though MOT was found to increase costs of overdose death based on productivity loss. NAS case reductions ranged from 1% (capacity change) to 13% (MOT). CONCLUSIONS: Using systems-based modeling, we showed that costs associated with NAS can be significantly reduced. However, effective implementation would require the involvement and coordination of several stakeholders. In addition, careful protocols for MOT should be considered to ensure pregnant women don't forgo prenatal care for fear of punitive consequences.

Prenatal Use of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and Other Prescription Opioids in Cases of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: North Carolina Medicaid, 2016-2018.

Objectives. To estimate use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and prescription opioids in pregnancy among mothers of infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Methods. We used linked 2016-2018 North Carolina birth certificate and newborn and maternal Medicaid claims data to identify infants with an NOWS diagnosis and maternal claims for MOUD and prescription opioids in pregnancy (n = 3395). Results. Among mothers of infants with NOWS, 38.6% had a claim for MOUD only, 14.3% had a claim for prescription opioids only, 8.1% had a claim for both MOUD and prescription opioids, and 39.1% did not have a claim for MOUD or prescription opioids in pregnancy. Non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to have a claim for MOUD than non-Hispanic White women. The percentage of infants born full term and normal birth weight was highest among women with MOUD or both MOUD and prescription opioid claims. Conclusions. In the 2016-2018 NC Medicaid population, 60% of mothers of infants with NOWS had MOUD or prescription opioid claims in pregnancy, underscoring the extent to which cases of NOWS may be a result of medically appropriate opioid use in pregnancy.

Integrated Review of the Assessment of Newborns With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To critically review and summarize current knowledge regarding the assessment of newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). DATA SOURCES: We searched the following databases for articles on the assessment of newborns with NAS that were published in English between January 2014 and June 2020: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms used to identify relevant research articles included neonatal abstinence syndrome; Finnegan Scale; eat, sleep, console; epigenetics; genetics; pharmacokinetics; and measurement. We independently reviewed articles for inclusion. STUDY SELECTION: We retrieved 435 articles through database searches and 17 through manual reference searches; 31 articles are included in the final review. Excluded articles were duplicates, not relevant to NAS, qualitative studies, and/or of low quality. DATA EXTRACTION: We used the methodology of Whittemore and Knafl to guide this integrative review. We extracted and organized data under the following headings: author, year and country, purpose, study design, participants, measurement, biomarker (if applicable), results, limitations, recommendations, and intervention. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scale is the most widely used instrument to measure symptoms of NAS in newborns, although it is very subjective. Recently, there has been a transition from the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scale to the eat, sleep, console method, which consists of structured assessment and intervention and has been shown to decrease length of hospital stay and total opioid treatment dose. Researchers examined biomarkers of NAS, including genetic markers and autonomic nervous system responses, on the variation in incidence and differential severity of NAS. In the included articles, women with opioid use disorder who were treated with naltrexone during pregnancy gave birth to newborns without NAS diagnoses. However, most women who were treated with buprenorphine gave birth to newborns with NAS diagnoses. CONCLUSION: NAS negatively affects newborns in a multitude of ways, and the objective assessment and measurement of the newborn's response to withdrawal remains understudied and needs further investigation.

Cost of neonatal abstinence syndrome: an economic analysis of English national data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) across neonatal units, explore healthcare utilisation and estimate the direct cost to the NHS. DESIGN: Population cohort study. SETTING: NHS neonatal units, using data held in the National Neonatal Research Database. PARTICIPANTS: Infants born between 2012 and 2017, admitted to a neonatal unit in England, receiving a diagnosis of NAS (n=6411). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, direct annual cost of care (£, 2016-2017 prices), duration of neonatal unit stay (discharge HR), predicted additional cost of care, and odds of receiving pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Of 524 334 infants admitted during the study period, 6411 had NAS. The incidence (1.6/1000 live births) increased between 2012 and 2017 (ß=0.07, 95% CI (0 to 0.14)) accounting for 12/1000 admissions and 23/1000 cot days nationally. The direct cost of care was £62 646 661 over the study period. Almost half of infants received pharmacotherapy (n=2631; 49%) and their time-to-discharge was significantly longer (median 18.2 vs 5.1 days; adjusted HR (aHR) 0.16, 95% CI (0.15 to 0.17)). Time-to-discharge was longer for formula-fed infants (aHR 0.73 (0.66 to 0.81)) and those discharged to foster care (aHR 0.77 (0.72 to 0.82)). The greatest predictor of additional care costs was receipt of pharmacotherapy (additional mean adjusted cost of £8420 per infant). CONCLUSIONS: This population study highlights the substantial cot usage and economic costs of caring for infants with NAS on neonatal units. A shift in how healthcare systems provide routine care for NAS could benefit infants and families while alleviating the burden on services.