Decoding 22q11.2: prenatal profiling and first-trimester risk assessment in Danish nationwide cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution of nuchal translucency thickness (NT), free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in pregnancies with a fetal 22q11.2 aberration. Furthermore, the performance of combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) and a new risk algorithm targeting 22q11.2 deletions in detecting affected pregnancies was evaluated. Finally, prenatal malformations and pregnancy outcome were assessed. METHODS: This was a nationwide registry-based cohort study of all pregnancies that underwent prenatal screening with a due date between January 2008 and December 2018 in Denmark. All cases with a fetal 22q11.2 deletion or duplication (hg19 chr22:18.9mio-25.0mio) diagnosed pre- or postnatally or following pregnancy loss or termination of pregnancy were retrieved from the Danish Cytogenetic Central Register and linked with pregnancy data from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Fetal and maternal characteristics, including cFTS results and pregnancy outcome, of pregnancies with any 22q11.2 deletion or duplication (LCR22-A to -H) and pregnancies with a classic deletion or duplication (LCR22-A to -D) diagnosed by chromosomal microarray were compared with those of a chromosomally normal reference group. A risk algorithm was developed for assessing patient-specific risks for classic 22q11.2 deletions based on NT, PAPP-A and ß-hCG. Detection rates and false-positive rates at different risk cut-offs were calculated. RESULTS: We included data on 143 pregnancies with a fetal 22q11.2 aberration, of which 97 were deletions (54 classic) and 46 were duplications (32 classic). NT was significantly increased in fetuses with a classic deletion (mean, 1.89 mm), those with any deletion (mean, 1.78 mm) and those with any duplication (mean, 1.86 mm) compared to the reference group (mean, 1.65 mm). ß-hCG multiples of the median (MoM) was decreased in all 22q11.2 subgroups compared with the reference group (mean, 1.02) and reached significance in pregnancies with a classic deletion and those with any deletion (mean, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively). PAPP-A MoM was significantly decreased in pregnancies with a classic duplication and those with any duplication (mean, 0.57 and 0.63, respectively), and was significantly increased in pregnancies with a classic deletion and those with any deletion (mean, 1.34 and 1.16, respectively), compared to reference pregnancies (mean, 1.01). The screen-positive rate by cFTS was significantly increased in pregnancies with a classic deletion (13.7%), any deletion (12.5%), a classic duplication (46.9%) or any duplication (37.8%) compared to the reference group (4.5%). A risk algorithm targeting classic 22q11.2 deletions more than doubled the prenatal detection rate of classic 22q11.2 deletions, but with a substantial increase in the false-positive rate. Structural malformations were detected in 41%, 35%, 17% and 25% of the pregnancies with a classic deletion, any deletion, classic duplication or any duplication, respectively. Pregnancy loss occurred in 40% of pregnancies with a classic deletion and 5% of those with a classic duplication diagnosed prenatally or following pregnancy loss. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of cFTS markers in pregnancies with a classic 22q11.2 duplication resembles that of the common trisomies, with decreased levels of PAPP-A. However, classic 22q11.2 deletions are associated with increased levels of PAPP-A, which likely limits early prenatal detection using the current cFTS risk algorithm. The scope for improving early detection of classic 22q11.2 deletions using targeted risk algorithms based on NT, PAPP-A and ß-hCG is limited. This demonstrates the capability, but also the limitations, of cFTS markers in detecting atypical chromosomal anomalies, which is important knowledge when designing new prenatal screening programs. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Family adaptation in families of individuals with Down syndrome from 12 countries.

Our current understanding of adaptation in families of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) is based primarily on findings from studies focused on participants from a single country. Guided by the Resiliency Model of Family Stress, Adjustment, and Adaptation, the purpose of this cross-country investigation, which is part of a larger, mixed methods study, was twofold: (1) to compare family adaptation in 12 countries, and (2) to examine the relationships between family variables and family adaptation. The focus of this study is data collected in the 12 countries where at least 30 parents completed the survey. Descriptive statistics were generated, and mean family adaptation was modeled in terms of each predictor independently, controlling for an effect on covariates. A parsimonious composite model for mean family adaptation was adaptively generated. While there were cross-country differences, standardized family adaptation mean scores fell within the average range for all 12 countries. Key components of the guiding framework (i.e., family demands, family appraisal, family resources, and family problem-solving communication) were important predictors of family adaptation. More cross-country studies, as well as longitudinal studies, are needed to fully understand how culture and social determinants of health influence family adaptation in families of individuals with DS.

Economic evaluation of prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies in Thailand.

Historically, there has been a lack of cost-effectiveness data regarding the inclusion of universal non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in the benefit package of the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in Thailand. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cost-benefit analysis of prenatal screening tests and calculate the budget impact that would result from the implementation of a universal NIPT program. A decision-tree model was employed to evaluate cost and benefit of different prenatal chromosomal abnormalities screenings: 1) first-trimester screening (FTS), 2) NIPT, and 3) definitive diagnostic (amniocentesis). The comparison was made between these screenings and no screening in three groups of pregnant women: all ages, < 35 years, and ≥ 35 years. The analysis was conducted from societal and governmental perspectives. The costs comprised direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs, while the benefit was cost-avoidance associated with caring for children with trisomy and the loss of productivity for caregivers. Parameter uncertainties were evaluated through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. From a governmental perspective, all three methods were found to be cost-beneficial. Among them, FTS was identified as the most cost-beneficial, especially for pregnant women aged ≥ 35 years. From a societal perspective, the definitive diagnostic test was not cost-effective, but the other two screening tests were. The most sensitive parameters for FTS and NIPT strategies were the productivity loss of caregivers and the incidence of trisomy 21. Our study suggested that NIPT was the most cost-effective strategy in Thailand, if the cost was reduced to 47 USD. This evidence-based information can serve as a crucial resource for policymakers when making informed decisions regarding the allocation of resources for prenatal care in Thailand and similar context.

[Clinical application and evaluation of health economics for non-invasive prenatal testing of fetuses in Tianjin].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy and health economic value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the prenatal screening of common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. METHODS: 10 612 pregnant women from October 2017 to December 2019 presented at the antenatal screening clinic of the General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University were selected as the study subjects. Results of NIPT and invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow-up outcome for the 10 612 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Meanwhile, NIPT data for two periods were analyzed for assessing the health economic value of NIPT as the second- or first-tier screening strategy for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13. RESULTS: The NIPT was successful in 10 528 (99.72%) subjects, with the sensitivity for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 being 100%, 92.86% and 100%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) being 89.74%, 61.90% and 44.44%, respectively. The PPV of NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies was 34.21%. Except for one false negative case of trisomy 18, the negative predictive value for trisomy 21, trisomy 13 and other chromosomal abnormalities were 100%. For pregnant women with high risk by serological screening, advanced maternal age or abnormal ultrasound soft markers, NIPT has yielded a significantly increased high risk ratio. There was no statistical difference in the PPV of NIPT among pregnant women from each subgroup. NIPT would have higher health economic value as a second-tier screening until 2019, while compared to 2015 ~ 2017, its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as a first-tier screening had declined clearly. CONCLUSION: The screening efficacy of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 for a mixed population is significantly better than conventional serological screening, but it is relatively low for sex chromosomal abnormalities. NIPT can also be recommended for populations with relatively high risks along with detailed pre- and post-test genetic counselling. From the perspective of health economics, except for open neural tube defects, it is possible for NIPT to replace the conventional serological screening in the future as its cost continues to decrease.

Financial impact of a specialized Down syndrome clinic: Implications and support for institutional support of specialty care clinics.

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have specific health care needs and require additional screening and surveillance for commonly associated conditions. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Genetics has provided clinical guidance in "Health Supervision for Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome." Many DS specialty centers (DSC) have been created, in part, to help ensure adherence to these guidelines. The primary purpose of this work is to determine the financial impact of a specialized DSC. A retrospective chart review was completed for all patients seen in DSC for fiscal year 2018 (June 2018-June 2019). Charts were reviewed to ascertain the financial impact of a DSC to a healthcare system by calculating total downstream charges (using CMS Chargemaster) as a surrogate marker for financial impact. Five-hundred-seventy-four patient encounters were conducted; 99 were new patient visits. Annual charges totaled $1,399,450. The 1-5-year-old age group accounted for greater than half of all charges. The greatest proportion of charges resulted from sleep studies and other diagnostic testing (55%). DS clinics are extremely helpful in ensuring that children receive guideline-based care. Taking into account downstream revenue, specialized DSCs are also financially beneficial to the institutions with whom they are affiliated.

Application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in diagnostic assessment of abnormal Down syndrome screening results.

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS) is the most common congenital cause of intellectual disability and also leads to numerous metabolic and structural problems. This study aims to explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis for pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results. METHODS: The study recruited 1452 pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results including 493 with an enlarged nuchal translucency thickness (NT ≥ 2.5 mm) and 959 with an abnormal second-trimester maternal serum biomarker screening results. They underwent amniocentesis to obtain amniotic fluid for CMA and karyotyping. RESULTS: CMA identified 74/1452 abnormal results, which was more efficient than karyotyping (51/1452, P < 0.05.) CMA is equivalent to traditional karyotyping for identifying aneuploidies. Compared to karyotyping CMA identified 1.90% more copy number variants (CNVs) ranging from 159Kb to 6496Kb. However, 34.4% of them were recurrent pathogenic CNVs associated with risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. CMA identified 13 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) results and 1 maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 7. Karyotyping identified 3 mosaic sex chromosome aneuploidy and 4 balanced translocation which could not be identified by CMA. In enlarged NT group, karyotyping identified 80.9% abnormal results while in serum screening group karyotyping identified 35.7%. However, the incidence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs was nearly the same in both groups. That was because aneuploidies and gross duplication/deletion were previously screened out by NT scan. CONCLUSIONS: CMA and karyotyping have both advantages and disadvantages in prenatal diagnosis of pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results. However, there was not enough evidence to support routine CMA in pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results.

[Health economic considerations of genetic disease screening - take Down syndrome as an example].

The ongoing development of high-throughput sequencing technology and continuous decline of sequencing cost have made it possible to carry out large-scale screening for genetic diseases, which are the main component of birth defects. The screening of genetic diseases is expected to significantly reduce the rate of birth defects and the burden of genetic diseases to the affected families and the society. Taking Down syndrome as an example, through the analysis of the cost-benefit ratio of relevant screening programs, this article has summarized the socio-economic indicators to be considered during the design and development of genetic disease screening.

Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplification (RCA). Further evaluation of its performance and related requirements are warranted. METHODS: At 16 sites, women at 10 to 20 weeks gestation provided informed consent, relevant information, and 2 to 3 blood samples. Samples shipped for testing were processed and stored. Women were enrolled at primary cfDNA screening, or following such screening at referral for diagnostic testing. RCA testing occurred post-enrollment, over 11 months. Diagnostic results and delivery notes determined clinical truth. Detection rates were based on confirmed trisomic pregnancies; false-positive rates were based on unaffected pregnancies from the general population. RESULTS: Detection rate for the common trisomies was 95.9% (117/122, 95% CI, 90.5%-98.5%); overall false-positive rate was 1.00% (22/2,205, 0.65%-1.51%). Test failure rate after repeat testing was 0.04%. When assay standard deviations were below pre-specified levels, the overall false-positive rate was much lower at 0.30% (P < 0.001). Fetal sex calls were correct for 99.7%. One technician analyzed 560 samples over 2 weeks, a rate of 14 000/year. CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment of this simplified cfDNA-based system for prenatal screening for common trisomies performed in a prenatal screening laboratory is encouraging. Improved detection, low failure rates and rapid reporting can be achieved by collecting 2 samples. Future priorities should include achieving higher run precision using a single collection tube. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03087357.

Significance of Low Maternal Serum Β-hCG Levels in the Assessment of the Risk of Atypical Chromosomal Abnormalities.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of prenatal cell-free DNA as a screening test has surpassed traditional combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) in the detection of common trisomies. However, its current limitation in detecting only common trisomies is affecting the diagnostic yield for other clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. METHODS: In efforts to optimize the detection of fetuses with genetic abnormalities, we have analyzed the relationship between the cFTS risk score and biomarkers with atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Furthermore, we have evaluated the impact of prenatal cell-free DNA screening on the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in our population. For these purposes, we performed a retrospective study of 877 singleton pregnancies who underwent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) between 2013 and 2020 and for whom cFTS data were available. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that low levels of free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) (≤0.37 multiples of the median) and increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT) (≥3.5 mm) were statistically associated with the presence of atypical chromosomal abnormalities. In fact, the risk of pathogenic CMA results increased from 6 to 10% when fetal NT was increased and from 6 to 20% when a low serum ß-hCG level was detected in the high-risk cFTS group. Moreover, our results showed that altered serum levels of ß-hCG can have a substantial impact on the early detection of clinically relevant copy number variants. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Traditional cFTS can potentially identify a substantial proportion of atypical chromosomal aberrations, and women with increased NT or low maternal serum ß-hCG levels are at increased risk of having pathogenic CMA results. Our results may help clinicians and women decide whether invasive testing or prenatal cell-free DNA screening testing is more appropriate for each situation.

Assessment and Clinical Utility of a Non-Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Technology.

Background: Rolling-circle replication (RCR) is a novel technology that has not been applied to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing until recently. Given the cost and simplicity advantages of this technology compared to other platforms currently used in cfDNA analysis, an assessment of RCR in clinical laboratories was performed. Here, we present the first validation study from clinical laboratories utilizing RCR technology. Methods: 831 samples from spontaneously pregnant women carrying a singleton fetus, and 25 synthetic samples, were analyzed for the fetal risk of trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13), by three laboratories on three continents. All the screen-positive pregnancies were provided post-test genetic counseling and confirmatory diagnostic invasive testing (e.g., amniocentesis). The screen-negative pregnancies were routinely evaluated at birth for fetal aneuploidies, using newborn examinations, and any suspected aneuploidies would have been offered diagnostic testing or confirmed with karyotyping. Results: The study found rolling-circle replication to be a highly viable technology for the clinical assessment of fetal aneuploidies, with 100% sensitivity for T21 (95% CI: 82.35-100.00%); 100.00% sensitivity for T18 (71.51-100.00%); and 100.00% sensitivity for T13 analyses (66.37-100.00%). The specificities were >99% for each trisomy (99.7% (99.01-99.97%) for T21; 99.5% (98.62-99.85%) for T18; 99.7% (99.03-99.97%) for T13), along with a first-pass no-call rate of 0.93%. Conclusions: The study showed that using a rolling-circle replication-based cfDNA system for the evaluation of the common aneuploidies would provide greater accuracy and clinical utility compared to conventional biochemical screening, and it would provide comparable results to other reported cfDNA methodologies.

Facial analysis technology for the detection of Down syndrome in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Down syndrome is one of the most common chromosomal anomalies affecting the world's population, with an estimated frequency of 1 in 700 live births. Despite its relatively high prevalence, diagnostic rates based on clinical features have remained under 70% for most of the developed world and even lower in countries with limited resources. While genetic and cytogenetic confirmation greatly increases the diagnostic rate, such resources are often non-existent in many low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. To address the needs of countries with limited resources, the implementation of mobile, user-friendly and affordable technologies that aid in diagnosis would greatly increase the odds of success for a child born with a genetic condition. Given that the Democratic Republic of the Congo is estimated to have one of the highest rates of birth defects in the world, our team sought to determine if smartphone-based facial analysis technology could accurately detect Down syndrome in individuals of Congolese descent. Prior to technology training, we confirmed the presence of trisomy 21 using low-cost genomic applications that do not need advanced expertise to utilize and are available in many low-resourced countries. Our software technology trained on 132 Congolese subjects had a significantly improved performance (91.67% accuracy, 95.45% sensitivity, 87.88% specificity) when compared to previous technology trained on individuals who are not of Congolese origin (p < 5%). In addition, we provide the list of most discriminative facial features of Down syndrome and their ranges in the Congolese population. Collectively, our technology provides low-cost and accurate diagnosis of Down syndrome in the local population.

[Application of Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Diagnostic Assessment of Abnormal Prenatal Serological Screening Results of Down's Syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) technology in the prenatal diagnostic assessment of abnormal serological prenatal screening results of Down's syndrome (DS). METHODS: A total of 3 578 amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis solely due to abnormal serological prenatal screening results were selected. The samples were categorized into 3 groups, 2 624 in the high-risk group, 662 in the borderline-risk group, and 292 in the abnormal multiple of median (MoM) group. a-CGH was performed on the Agilent CGX ™ (8×60K) platform and the data were analyzed by the Genoglyphix ® software. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.38% (121/3 578). Among the chromosomal abnormalities, 49.59% (60/121) was aneuploidies, 42.15% (51/121) was pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs), and 8.26% (10/121) was likely pathogenic CNVs (lpCNVs). The detection rate of copy number variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was 1.03% (37/3 578). In the high-risk, the borderline-risk and the abnormal MoM groups, the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.54% (93/2 624), 2.87% (19/662) and 3.08% (9/292), respectively; the detection rate of p/lp CNVs was 1.64% (43/2 624), 1.81% (12/662) and 2.05% (6/292), respectively; the detection rate of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 was 1.37% (36/2 624), 0.76% (5/662) and 0.34% (1/292) in the three groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in all the detection rate among these groups ( P>0.05). One sample with X(51)/XYY(49) confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was misdiagnosed by a-CGH. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis with a-CGH is of great significance for reducing birth defects in pregnancies with abnormal serological prenatal screening results of DS. It can also be used to detect CNVs of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes.

Specialty clinics for adults with Down syndrome: A clinic survey.

Specialty centers improve care for patients with Down syndrome. The cohort of adults with Down syndrome is increasing, but the capacity for specialty centers to meet their medical care needs is unknown. Electronic survey of staff of specialty clinics for adults with Down syndrome was conducted. Review of online clinic listings, and calculation of the number of adults with Down syndrome were performed. Analysis identified the percent of adults with Down syndrome who could have their medical care needs met in a current specialty clinic. Fourteen specialty clinics report providing care for 4038 adults with Down syndrome. Respondents reported gaps in care including: limitations of existing clinics, need for additional clinics, and knowledgeable health professionals in Down syndrome. Survey-respondent clinic capacity would meet needs of 3% of adults with Down syndrome. Twenty-five clinics for adults with Down syndrome were listed online with capacity to care for 6517 adults with Down syndrome meeting the needs of 5% of the population. Additional clinic capacity is needed to meet the needs of adults with Down syndrome. Survey of existing clinics provides guidance to create additional clinics, including: must-have team members, current sources of clinic financial support, and gaps in current clinical care.

Age-related DNA methylation changes are sex-specific: a comprehensive assessment.

The existence of a sex gap in human health and longevity has been widely documented. Autosomal DNA methylation differences between males and females have been reported, but so far few studies have investigated if DNA methylation is differently affected by aging in males and females. We performed a meta-analysis of 4 large whole blood datasets, comparing 4 aspects of epigenetic age-dependent remodeling between the two sexes: differential methylation, variability, epimutations and entropy. We reported that a large fraction (43%) of sex-associated probes undergoes age-associated DNA methylation changes, and that a limited number of probes show age-by-sex interaction. We experimentally validated 2 regions mapping in FIGN and PRR4 genes and showed sex-specific deviations of their methylation patterns in models of decelerated (centenarians) and accelerated (Down syndrome) aging. While we did not find sex differences in the age-associated increase in epimutations and entropy, we showed that the number of probes having an age-related increase in methylation variability is 15 times higher in males compared to females. Our results can offer new epigenetic tools to study the interaction between aging and sex and can pave the way to the identification of molecular triggers of sex differences in longevity and age-related diseases prevalence.

Assessment of laboratories offering cell-free (cf) DNA screening for Down syndrome: results of the 2018 College of American Pathology External Educational Exercises.

PURPOSE: Summarize and interpret results from exercises distributed to laboratories offering cell-free (cf) DNA screening for Down syndrome. METHODS: The College of American Pathologists distributed three patient-derived plasma specimens twice in 2018. Sequencing platforms, test methods, results, and responses to supplemental questions were collected. Results were not graded but discrepancies were identified. RESULTS: Sixty-five laboratories from six continents enrolled; six provided no results. The most common methodology was shotgun/genome sequencing (39/56, 70%). Overall, 40% of the gestational or maternal age responses were incorrect but 45% of the errors were corrected by the next distribution. Fetal fractions from 54 responding laboratories generally agreed with the intended response. No genotyping errors occurred (40/40 for trisomy 21 and 226/226 for euploid challenges) but 10 additional tests failed (3.6%). All 213 fetal sex calls were correct. Participants reported their clinical text for a Down syndrome screen positive test; 39% were classified as inadequate or misleading. CONCLUSION: Patient-derived materials are suitable for all enrolled technologies/methodologies, but collecting material is challenging. Suggested clinical text includes the terms "screen positive" and "screen negative." Overall, laboratories performed well. Future efforts will focus on potential manufactured samples, clarifying results reporting and including additional chromosome abnormalities.

Cost and efficacy comparison of prenatal recall and reflex DNA screening for trisomy 21, 18 and 13.

OBJECTIVE: To compare costs and efficacy of reflex and recall prenatal DNA screening for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 (affected pregnancies). In both methods women have Combined test markers measured. With recall screening, women with a high Combined test risk are recalled for counselling and offered a DNA blood test or invasive diagnostic testing. With reflex screening, a DNA analysis is automatically performed on plasma collected when blood was collected for measurement of the Combined test markers. METHODS: Published data were used to estimate, for each method, using various unit costs and risk cut-offs, the cost per woman screened, cost per affected pregnancy diagnosed, and for a given number of women screened, numbers of affected pregnancies diagnosed, unaffected pregnancies with positive results, and women with unaffected pregnancies having invasive diagnostic testing. RESULTS: Cost per woman screened is lower with reflex v recall screening: £37 v £38, and £11,043 v £11,178 per affected pregnancy diagnosed (DNA £250, Combined test markers risk cut-off 1 in 150). Reflex screening results in similar numbers of affected pregnancies diagnosed, with 100-fold fewer false-positives and 20-fold fewer women with unaffected pregnancies having invasive diagnostic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Reflex DNA screening is less expensive, more cost-effective, and safer than recall screening.

The contingent use of cell-free fetal DNA for prenatal screening of trisomies 21, 18, 13 in pregnant women within a national health service: A budget impact analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is highly accurate in the detection of common fetal autosomal trisomies. Aim of this project was to investigate short-term costs and clinical outcomes of the contingent use of cffDNA for prenatal screening of trisomies 21, 18, 13 within a national health service (NHS). METHODS: An economic analysis was developed from the perspective of the Italian NHS to compare two possible scenarios for managing pregnant women: women managed according to the Standard of Care screening (SoC) vs a cffDNA scenario, where Harmony Prenatal Test was introduced as a second line screening choice for women with an "at risk" result from SoC screening. RESULTS: The introduction of cffDNA as a second line screening test, conditional to a risk ≥ 1:1,000 from SoC screening, showed a 3% increase in the detection of trisomies, with a 71% decrease in the number of invasive tests performed. Total short-term costs (pregnancy management until childbirth) decreased by € 19 million (from € 84.5 to 65.5 million). CONCLUSION: The adoption of the Harmony Prenatal Test in women resulting at risk from SoC screening, implied a greater number of trisomies detection, together with a reduction of the healthcare costs.

Cost-effectiveness of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomies and other unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities: model-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomies (13/18/21) and other unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (UBCA), following the introduction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. METHODS: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to estimate prevalence, safety, screening-program costs and healthcare costs of five different prenatal screening strategies, using a virtual cohort of 652 653 pregnant women in France. Data were derived from the French Biomedicine Agency and published articles. Uncertainty was addressed using one-way sensitivity analysis. The five strategies compared were: (i) cfDNA testing for women with a risk following first-trimester screening of ≥ 1/250; (ii) cfDNA testing for women with a risk of ≥ 1/1000 (currently recommended); (iii) cfDNA testing in the general population (regardless of risk); (iv) invasive testing for women with a risk of ≥ 1/250 (historical strategy); and (v) invasive testing for women with a risk of ≥ 1/1000. RESULTS: In our virtual population, at similar risk thresholds, cfDNA testing compared with invasive testing was cheaper but less effective. Compared with the historical strategy, cfDNA testing at the ≥ 1/1000 risk threshold was a more expensive strategy that detected 158 additional trisomies, but also 175 fewer other UBCA. Implementation of cfDNA testing in the general population would give an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €9 166 689 per additional anomaly detected compared with the historical strategy. CONCLUSION: Extending cfDNA to lower risk thresholds or even to all pregnancies would detect more trisomies, but at greater expense and with lower detection rate of other UBCA, compared with the historical strategy. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Relación costo-eficacia de cinco estrategias de cribado prenatal para trisomías y otras anomalías cromosómicas no equilibradas: un análisis basado en modelos OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia en función de los costos de cinco estrategias de cribado prenatal para trisomías (13/18/21) y otras anomalías cromosómicas no equilibradas (UBCA, por sus siglas en inglés), tras la introducción del análisis de ADN fetal (cfDNA, por sus siglas en inglés). MÉTODOS: Se realizó un análisis de la relación costo-eficacia basado en modelos para estimar la prevalencia, la seguridad, los costos de los programas de cribado y los costos sanitarios de cinco estrategias diferentes de cribado prenatal, para lo cual se usó una cohorte virtual de 652 653 mujeres embarazadas en Francia. Los datos se obtuvieron de la Agencia Francesa de Biomedicina y de artículos publicados. La incertidumbre se abordó mediante un análisis de sensibilidad unidireccional. Las cinco estrategias comparadas fueron: (i) pruebas de cfDNA para mujeres con un riesgo ≥1/250 después del examen del primer trimestre; (ii) pruebas de cfDNA para mujeres con un riesgo ≥1/1000 (las recomendadas actualmente); (iii) pruebas de cfDNA en la población general (independientemente del riesgo); (iv) pruebas invasivas para mujeres con un riesgo ≥1/250 (estrategia histórica); y (v) pruebas invasivas para mujeres con un riesgo ≥1/1000. RESULTADOS: En esta población virtual, con umbrales de riesgo similares, la prueba de cfDNA fue más barata pero menos efectiva en comparación con la prueba invasiva. En comparación con la estrategia histórica, la prueba de cfDNA para el umbral de riesgo de ≥1/1000 fue una estrategia más costosa que detectó 158 trisomías adicionales, pero también 175 menos de otras UBCA. La aplicación de las pruebas de cfDNA en la población general daría una relación costo-eficacia incremental de 9 166 689 EUR por cada anomalía adicional detectada en comparación con la estrategia histórica. CONCLUSIÓN: Extender las pruebas de cfDNA a umbrales de riesgo más bajos o incluso a todos los embarazos detectaría más trisomías, pero a un costo mayor y con una tasa de detección más baja de otras UBCA, en comparación con la estrategia histórica.

Assessment of genomic instability and proliferation index in cultured lymphocytes of patients with Down syndrome, congenital anomalies and aplastic anaemia.

One hundred and fifteen cases [Down Syndrome (DS) n = 75, Multiple Congenital Anomalies (MCA) n = 15 and Aplastic Anaemia (AA) n = 25], with respect to their nature of predisposition to cancer, were selected for clinical, cytogenetic and cyto-molecular studies to understand the severity of genomic instability according to the nature of the different diseases. Cytogenetic studies included chromosomal aberration (CA) assays and cytokinesis block micronucleus cytome (CBMN-Cyt) assays. In DS, MCA and AA, average frequencies of nuclear anomalies (NA) were 0.015 ±â€¯0.0006, 0.021 ±â€¯0.00123, 0.031 ±â€¯0.00098, respectively and CA were 0.107 ±â€¯0.003, 0.105 ±â€¯0.008, 0.158 ±â€¯0.006, respectively per metaphase. The extent of genomic instability in patients analysed by CBMN-Cyt assays and CA assays was statistically significant in all groups. Comparatively decreased cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI) observed in AA patients of 1.59 ±â€¯0.05, support the assumption that decreased levels of CBPI indicate increased genomic damage. Furthermore, we performed peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridisation (PNA FISH) analysis to understand the mechanisms behind genomic instability and telomere dysfunction. PNA FISH showed increased frequencies of telomere signal free ends (0.98 ±â€¯0.13) in individuals with higher genomic instability. Therefore, the results demonstrate that increased chromosomal instability along with higher telomere attrition or loss may initiate gross DNA damage and leads to chromosomal instability, which is an important mechanism for triggering genomic instability - an important hallmark of cancer cells.