Prevalence and Management of Laryngomalacia in Patients With Pierre Robin Sequence.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the prevalence and presentation of laryngomalacia and efficacy of supraglottoplasty (SGP) in a cohort of patients with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care children's hospital. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with PRS born between January 2010 and June 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Chart review included demographics, comorbid airway obstruction including laryngomalacia, timing of surgical interventions, clinical symptoms, sleep study data, and modified barium swallow study data.126 patients with PRS were included; 54% had an associated syndrome, 64% had an overt cleft palate, and 22% had a submucous cleft palate. 64/126 were noted to have laryngomalacia (51%). Patients with concurrent PRS and laryngomalacia were significantly more likely to have submucous cleft palate (P = .005) and present with aspiration with cough (P = .01) compared to patients with PRS without laryngomalacia. Patients with concurrent laryngomalacia and PRS showed a significant decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and obstructive AHI (OAHI) after mandibular distraction, with a median AHI and OAHI improvement of 22.3 (P = .001) and 19.8 (P = .002), respectively. Patients who underwent only SGP did not show significant improvement in these parameters (P = .112 for AHI, P = .064 for OAHI).The prevalence of laryngomalacia in our PRS cohort was 51%. Patients with PRS and laryngomalacia are more likely to present with overt aspiration compared to patients with PRS without laryngomalacia. These data support that laryngomalacia does not appear to be a contraindication to pursuing MDO.

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have proven the efficacy of mandibular distraction osteogenesis or tongue-lip adhesion in Robin sequence infants with upper airway obstruction. However, none has compared health-related quality of life outcomes. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, Robin sequence infants younger than 1 year, who underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis or tongue-lip adhesion, were included (2006 to 2016). The infants' caregivers were asked to complete a questionnaire based on the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory. RESULTS: The response rate was 71 percent (22 of the 31 questionnaires; mandibular distraction osteogenesis, 12 of 15; and tongue-lip adhesion, 10 of 16) and median age at surgery was 24 days (range, 5 to 131 days). Median total Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory scores after mandibular distraction osteogenesis and after tongue-lip adhesion were 21.9 (interquartile range, 9.4) and 26.0 (interquartile range, 37.5), respectively (p = 0.716), indicating an overall benefit from both procedures. Positive changes were observed in all subgroups emotion, physical health, learning, and vitality. In syndromic Robin sequence, both procedures demonstrated a lower positive change in health-related quality of life compared with isolated Robin sequence (p = 0.303). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical procedures demonstrated an overall benefit in health-related quality-of-life outcomes, with no significant differences. The authors' findings contribute to the debate regarding the use of mandibular distraction osteogenesis versus tongue-lip adhesion in the surgical treatment of Robin sequence; however, studies evaluating health-related quality of life in larger Robin sequence cohorts are necessary to identify which procedure is likely to be best in each individual Robin sequence infant. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the gastrostomy rates in infants with Pierre Robin sequence treated with tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic plastic and reconstructive surgery patients treated over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was surgical intervention (tongue-lip adhesion or distraction osteogenesis). Secondary predictor variables were categorized as demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was the need for gastrostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, costs, and length of stay. RESULTS: Thirty-one tongue-lip adhesion and 30 distraction osteogenesis patients were included in the study. The groups were statistically comparable with regard to demographic and clinical factors (p > 0.18). Gastrostomy rates were higher in patients who underwent tongue-lip adhesion (48 percent) versus those who underwent distraction osteogenesis (16.7 percent; p = 0.008). In an adjusted model, subjects undergoing tongue-lip adhesion were more likely to require gastrostomy tube for nutritional support (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 25.2; p = 0.007). There were two major complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and none in the distraction osteogenesis group. There were three minor complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and five in the distraction osteogenesis group. Total operating room costs were higher for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.05), and total hospital costs and length of stay were higher for tongue-lip adhesion (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among infants with symptomatic Pierre Robin sequence, treatment by distraction osteogenesis is associated with a lower risk for gastrostomy placement for nutritional support. Hospital costs are higher for tongue-lip adhesion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

A low-cost method of craniofacial distraction osteogenesis.

AIM: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective treatment modality for the correction of craniofacial deformities. The cost of these devices is significant and may preclude routine use of these distractors in developing countries. Hence, distraction osteogenesis was performed using medical equipment that was readily available in any hospital at minimal cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2013, a retrospective study was performed on infants and neonates who underwent primary distraction for craniofacial abnormalities. Midface or mandibular distraction was performed because of respiratory impairment and/or globe exposure. The apparatus used included Steinmann pins, stainless steel wires, attachment bolts, orthopaedic pulleys, string and intravenous bags for weights. For midface distraction, a transzygomatic pin was inserted, and a transmandibular pin or a cerclage wire was inserted into the mandible through the symphysis or body of the mandible and connected to the pulley system. RESULTS: Distraction osteogenesis was performed on five patients - three mandibular distractions (Pierre Robin sequence) and two transfacial distractions (Apert syndrome/Pfeiffer syndrome type III). The mean age, duration of distraction and duration of consolidation at the time of distraction was 60.5 days, 18.6 days and 16.4 days, respectively. The mean length of distraction achieved was 12 mm. Common complications observed were pin loosening, pressure necrosis of the skin and uneven pull. A major disadvantage was the longer hospital stay required. CONCLUSION: The African method of distraction is effective, easy and cost effective and could be used in third-world hospitals where surgical expertise or expensive distraction sets are not freely available.

Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of primary palatoplasty in Robin Sequence (RS); to verify the relationship between modalities of assessment of nasality; to compare nasality between techniques at palatoplasty. METHODS: This study involved the identification of hypernasality in four modalities: live assessment with 4-point scale; live assessment with cul-de-sac test; multiple listeners' ratings of recorded phrase; nasometric assessment. Live ratings of speech nasality and nasalance scores were retrieved from charts, while a recorded phrase was rated by listeners for occurrence of hypernasality. Agreement between the modalities was established as well as association between nasality, nasal turbulence and age at surgery and at assessment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare findings between surgical techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between nasalance, live assessment with 4-point scale, live assessment with cul-de-sac, and multiple listeners' ratings of recorded samples ranged between reasonable (0.32) and perfect (1.00). Percentage occurrence of hypernasality varied largely between assessment modalities. Mean occurrence of hypernasality was lower for the group submitted to Furlow technique (26%) than the group that received von Langenbeck technique (53%). Only findings obtained live were statistically significant (scale: p=0.012; cul-de-sac: p<0.001). Listeners identified nasal turbulence for 22 (32%) samples out of the 69 recordings, and an association was found between hypernasality and nasal turbulence. CONCLUSION: Lower occurrence of hypernasality was identified for patients with RS in Furlow group. Identification of hypernasality varied largely among the four assessment modalities.

Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence / Avaliação da nasalidade de fala em crianças com Sequência de Robin

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of primary palatoplasty in Robin Sequence (RS); to verify the relationship between modalities of assessment of nasality; to compare nasality between techniques at palatoplasty. METHODS: This study involved the identification of hypernasality in four modalities: live assessment with 4-point scale; live assessment with cul-de-sac test; multiple listeners' ratings of recorded phrase; nasometric assessment. Live ratings of speech nasality and nasalance scores were retrieved from charts, while a recorded phrase was rated by listeners for occurrence of hypernasality. Agreement between the modalities was established as well as association between nasality, nasal turbulence and age at surgery and at assessment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare findings between surgical techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between nasalance, live assessment with 4-point scale, live assessment with cul-de-sac, and multiple listeners' ratings of recorded samples ranged between reasonable (0.32) and perfect (1.00). Percentage occurrence of hypernasality varied largely between assessment modalities. Mean occurrence of hypernasality was lower for the group submitted to Furlow technique (26%) than the group that received von Langenbeck technique (53%). Only findings obtained live were statistically significant (scale: p=0.012; cul-de-sac: p<0.001). Listeners identified nasal turbulence for 22 (32%) samples out of the 69 recordings, and an association was found between hypernasality and nasal turbulence. CONCLUSION: Lower occurrence of hypernasality was identified for patients with RS in Furlow group. Identification of hypernasality varied largely among the four assessment modalities. .

OBJETIVO: Reportar os resultados da palatoplastia primária na Sequência de Robin (SR); verificar a relação entre modalidades de avaliação da nasalidade; comparar nasalidade entre técnicas na palatoplastia. MÉTODOS: Este estudo envolveu a identificação da hipernasalidade em quatro modalidades: avaliação ao vivo com escala de quatro pontos; avaliação ao vivo com teste cul-de-sac; julgamento de gravações por juízes e avaliação nasométrica. Julgamentos ao vivo da nasalidade e escores de nasalância foram obtidos em prontuários, enquanto uma frase gravada foi julgada por juízes para ocorrência de nasalidade. Concordância entre as quatro modalidades foi estabelecida assim como associação entre nasalidade, turbulência nasal e idades na cirurgia e na avaliação. Teste exato de Fisher foi usado para comparar achados entre as técnicas cirúrgicas. RESULTADOS: A concordância entre nasalância, avaliação ao vivo com escala de quatro pontos e com teste cul-de-sac e julgamentos de gravações por juízes variou entre razoável (0,32) e perfeita (1,00). Porcentagem de ocorrência de hipernasalidade variou muito entre as diferentes modalidades. Ocorrência média de hipernsalidade no grupo operado com técnica de Furlow foi menor (26%) do que no grupo que recebeu a técnica de von Langenbeck (53%). Somente os resultados avaliados ao vivo foram estatisticamente significantes (escala: p=0,012; cul-de-sac: p<0,001). Juízes ouviram turbulência nasal em 22 (32%) das 69 gravações e uma associação entre hipernasalidade e turbulência nasal foi encontrada. CONCLUSÃO: Ocorrência de hipernasalidade foi menor para os pacientes com SR que receberam a técnica de Furlow. Identificação da hipernasalidade variou grandemente entre as quatro modalidades de avaliação. .

Cost analysis of mandibular distraction versus tracheostomy in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate costs associated with surgical treatment for neonates with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively studied neonates with PRS treated from 2001 to 2009 with either tracheostomy (Trach), mandibular distraction (MD), or Trach with subsequent MD (Trach+MD). Actual charges over a 3-year period associated with operative costs, hospital stay, imaging and sleep studies, clinic visits, and related emergency room visits were collected. Home tracheostomy care charges were estimated individually for each patient. Charges were compared using regression and appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: Forty-seven neonates were included in the study (MD, n = 26; Trach, n = 12; Trach+MD, n = 9). Trach group patients had 2.6-fold higher charges than the MD group despite no difference in length of hospital stay. This difference increased to 7.3-fold when including home trach care-related costs. Trach+MD group patients had longer hospital lengths of stay and higher operation room (OR) fees, but no increased total charges compared with the Trach only group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with severe PRS, mandibular distraction provides significant cost savings over tracheostomy ($300,000 per patient over 3 years). Increased costs with tracheostomy come from greater hospital-related charges, more frequent airway procedures, a higher incidence of gastrostomy tube feeds, and home trach care costs. A careful examination of long-term outcomes will be critical as mandibular distraction continues to gain acceptance for treatment of PRS.

Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Robin sequence: a comparative cost analysis.

Many treatments have been described for infants with Robin sequence and severe respiratory distress, but there have not been many comparative studies of outcome and cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the cost and complications of two common interventions - mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tracheostomy. Nine patients with isolated Robin sequence (mandibular distraction osteogenesis, n=5, and tracheostomy, n=4) were included in the analyses. Predetermined costs and complications were obtained retrospectively from medical records and by questionnaires to the parents over a 12-month period. Overall direct costs (admission to hospital, diagnostics, surgery, and homecare) were 3 times higher for tracheostomy (€105.523 compared with €33.482, p=0.02). Overall indirect costs (absence from work) were almost 5 times higher (€2.543 compared with €543, p=0.02). There was a threefold increase in overall total cost/patient (both direct and indirect) for tracheostomy (€108.057 compared with 34.016, p=0.02) and 4 times more complications were encountered. This study shows that mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants diagnosed with Robin sequence costs significantly less and results in fewer complications than tracheostomy, and this contributes to our current knowledge about the ideal approach for infants with Robin sequence and might provide a basis for institutional protocols in the future.

Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Canadian children with Pierre Robin sequence: a comparative cost analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Upper airway obstruction in newborns with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) may be severe enough to require a surgical intervention. Tracheostomy has been the traditional gold standard, but mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been proven to be an effective alternative procedure. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to conduct the first comparative cost analysis between tracheostomy and MDO in Canada. METHODS: All patients with PRS who underwent tracheostomy or MDO between January 2005 and December 2010 were included. Tracheostomy and MDO procedures were broken down into individual components, and the associated costs for these components were totaled. The average per-patient cost for each modality was then compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 52 children underwent either a tracheostomy (n  =  31) or MDO (n  =  21). The average age at surgery, gender, and presence of associated syndromes were similar in both groups. Taking into account the cost of the surgeries, health care professional fees, and hospital stay, the total per-patient treatment cost was determined to be $57,648.55 for MDO and $92,164.45 for tracheostomy. The majority of the cost for the tracheostomy group was associated with prolonged hospital stay after the operation ($72,827.85). Overall, the average per-patient cost was 1.6 times greater in the tracheostomy group compared to the MDO group (p  =  .039). CONCLUSION: The initial cost of MDO was less than the tracheostomy cost for newborns with PRS and severe upper airway obstruction at our health care centre. Further prospective analysis considering the long-term costs is required to possibly reduce long-term health care costs.

The value proposition: using a cost improvement map to improve value for patients with nonsyndromic, isolated cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: As health care costs rise exponentially in the United States, increasing emphasis is being placed on measuring value, which incorporates both quality and costs. Although the concept of continuous quality improvement has taken a firm foothold in health care, techniques for measuring and continuously improving costs at the patient or system level are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective, microcosting analysis mapped detailed medical costs over 18 months for 25 patients with nonsyndromic, isolated cleft palate to illustrate the concept of a continuous cost improvement map in a complex, multidisciplinary condition. RESULTS: Care for patients with nonsyndromic, isolated cleft palate was mapped to three timelines based on diagnostic subtype. Patients with Robin sequence requiring early surgical intervention for airway or feeding management (n = 4) had median costs that were triple those of Robin patients managed conservatively (n = 5) ($87,841 versus $27,864, respectively) as compared with patients without Robin sequence (n = 16) ($15,698). Inpatient services accounted for 85 to 95 percent of all costs, which were driven by the operating room, intensive care unit, and inpatient ward. More detailed analysis of each cost driver is reported. CONCLUSIONS: The cost improvement map provides a counterpart to the quality improvement map to illustrate how costs may be incorporated into value improvement efforts for complex, multidisciplinary conditions. The transparency and level of detail provided by this methodology are critical for internal improvement efforts and offer valuable insight for health care managers and policy makers, whose decisions should be based on accurate, patient-centered data.