Empirical analysis of lead neurotoxicity mode of action and its application in health risk assessment.

The mode of action (MOA) framework is proposed to inform a biological link between chemical exposures and adverse health effects. Despite a significant increase in knowledge and awareness, the application of MOA in human health risk assessment (RA) remains limited. This study aims to discuss the adoption of MOA for health RA within a regulatory context, taking our previously proposed but not yet validated MOA for lead neurotoxicity as an example. We first conducted a quantitative weight of evidence (qWOE) assessment, which revealed that the MOA has a moderate confidence. Then, targeted bioassays were performed within an in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) model to quantitatively validate the scientific validity of key events (KEs) in terms of essentiality and concordance of empirical support (dose/temporal concordance), which increases confidence in utilizing the MOA for RA. Building upon the quantitative validation data, we further conducted benchmark dose (BMD) analysis to map dose-response relationships for the critical toxicity pathways, and the lower limit of BMD at a 5% response (BMDL5) was identified as the point of departure (POD) value for adverse health effects. Notably, perturbation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) signaling pathway exhibited the lowest POD value, measured at 0.0062 µM. Considering bioavailability, we further calculated a provisional health-based guidance value (HBGV) for children's lead intake, determining it to be 2.56 µg/day. Finally, the health risk associated with the HBGV was assessed using the hazard quotient (HQ) approach, which indicated that the HBGV established in this study is a relative safe reference value for lead intake. In summary, our study described the procedure for utilizing MOA in health RA and set an example for MOA-based human health risk regulation.

Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union.

BACKGROUND: In the European Union (EU), the safety assessment of plant protection products relies to a large extent on toxicity studies commissioned by the companies producing them. By law, all performed studies must be included in the dossier submitted to authorities when applying for approval or renewal of the active substance. METHODS: For one type of toxicity, i.e. developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), we evaluated if studies submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had also been disclosed to EU authorities. RESULTS: We identified 35 DNT studies submitted to the U.S. EPA and with the corresponding EU dossiers available. Of these, 9 DNT studies (26%) were not disclosed by the pesticide company to EU authorities. For 7 of these studies, we have identified an actual or potential regulatory impact. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) non-disclosure of DNT studies to EU authorities, in spite of clear legal requirements, seems to be a recurring phenomenon, (2) the non-disclosure may introduce a bias in the regulatory risk assessment, and (3) without full access to all performed toxicity studies, there can be no reliable safety evaluation of pesticides by EU authorities. We suggest that EU authorities should cross-check their data sets with their counterparts in other jurisdictions. In addition, applications for pesticide approval should be cross-checked against lists of studies performed at test facilities operating under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), to ensure that all studies have been submitted to authorities. Furthermore, rules should be amended so that future studies should be commissioned by authorities rather than companies. This ensures the authorities' knowledge of existing studies and prevents the economic interest of the company from influencing the design, performance, reporting and dissemination of studies. The rules or practices should also be revised to ensure that non-disclosure of toxicity studies carries a significant legal risk for pesticide companies.

Framework to leverage physical therapists for the assessment and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN).

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a highly prevalent, dose-limiting, costly, and tough-to-treat adverse effect of several chemotherapy agents, presenting as sensory and motor dysfunction in the distal extremities. Due to limited effective treatments, CIPN can permanently reduce patient function, independence, and quality of life. One of the most promising interventions for CIPN is physical therapy which includes exercise, stretching, balance, and manual therapy interventions. Currently, there are no physical therapy guidelines for CIPN, thus limiting its uptake and potential effectiveness. METHODS: Utilizing the authors' collective expertise spanning physical therapy, symptom management research, oncology, neurology, and treating patients with CIPN, we propose a comprehensive clinical workflow for physical therapists to assess and treat CIPN. This workflow is based on (1) physical therapy guidelines for treating neurologic symptoms like those of CIPN, (2) results of clinical research on physical therapy and exercise, and (3) physical therapy clinical judgement. RESULTS: We present detailed tables of pertinent physical therapy assessment and treatment methods that can be used in clinical settings. CIPN assessment should include detailed sensory assessment, objective strength assessments of involved extremities, and validated physical performance measures incorporating static and dynamic balance, gait, and functional mobility components. CIPN treatment should involve sensorimotor, strength, balance, and endurance-focused interventions, alongside a home-based exercise prescription that includes aerobic training. We conclude with action items for oncology teams, physical therapists, patients, and researchers to best apply this framework to address CIPN. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapists are in a unique position to help assess, prevent, and treat CIPN given their training and prevalence, yet there are no physical therapy clinical practice guidelines for CIPN. Our preliminary suggestions for CIPN assessments and treatments can catalyze the development of guidelines to assess and treat CIPN. We urge oncology teams, physical therapists, patients, and researchers to develop, adapt, and disseminate this framework to help alleviate the burden of chemotherapy on patients with cancer.

Assessment of neurotransmitter release in human iPSC-derived neuronal/glial cells: a missing in vitro assay for regulatory developmental neurotoxicity testing.

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) and their differentiated neuronal/glial derivatives have been recently considered suitable to assess in vitro developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) triggered by exposure to environmental chemicals. The use of human-relevant test systems combined with in vitro assays specific for different neurodevelopmental events, enables a mechanistic understanding of the possible impact of environmental chemicals on the developing brain, avoiding extrapolation uncertainties associated with in vivo studies. Currently proposed in vitro battery for regulatory DNT testing accounts for several assays suitable to study key neurodevelopmental processes, including NSC proliferation and apoptosis, differentiation into neurons and glia, neuronal migration, synaptogenesis, and neuronal network formation. However, assays suitable to measure interference of compounds with neurotransmitter release or clearance are at present not included, which represents a clear gap of the biological applicability domain of such a testing battery. Here we applied a HPLC-based methodology to measure the release of neurotransmitters in a previously characterized hiPSC-derived NSC model undergoing differentiation towards neurons and glia. Glutamate release was assessed in control cultures and upon depolarization, as well as in cultures repeatedly exposed to some known neurotoxicants (BDE47 and lead) and chemical mixtures. Obtained data indicate that these cells have the ability to release glutamate in a vesicular manner, and that both glutamate clearance and vesicular release concur in the maintenance of extracellular glutamate levels. In conclusion, analysis of neurotransmitter release is a sensitive readout that should be included in the envisioned battery of in vitro assays for DNT testing.

Considering developmental neurotoxicity in vitro data for human health risk assessment using physiologically-based kinetic modeling: deltamethrin case study.

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is a potential hazard of chemicals. Recently, an in vitro testing battery (DNT IVB) was established to complement existing rodent in vivo approaches. Deltamethrin (DLT), a pyrethroid with a well-characterized neurotoxic mode of action, has been selected as a reference chemical to evaluate the performance of the DNT IVB. The present study provides context for evaluating the relevance of these DNT IVB results for the human health risk assessment of DLT by estimating potential human fetal brain concentrations after maternal exposure to DLT. We developed a physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model for rats which was then translated to humans considering realistic in vivo exposure conditions (acceptable daily intake [ADI] for DLT). To address existing uncertainties, we designed case studies considering the most relevant drivers of DLT uptake and distribution. Calculated human fetal brain concentrations were then compared with the lowest benchmark concentration achieved in the DNT IVB. The developed rat PBK model was validated on in vivo rat toxicokinetic data of DLT over a broad range of doses. The uncertainty based case study evaluation confirmed that repeated exposure to DLT at an ADI level would likely result in human fetal brain concentrations far below the in vitro benchmark. The presented results indicate that DLT concentrations in the human fetal brain are highly unlikely to reach concentrations associated with in vitro findings under realistic exposure conditions. Therefore, the new in vitro DNT results are considered to have no impact on the current risk assessment approach.

Assessment of Pretreatment and Posttreatment Evolution of Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Patients Who Develop Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.

Importance: Determining whether neurofilament light chain (NfL) elevations in patients who develop immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occur before or after infusion of cellular product is important to identify high-risk patients and inform whether neuroaxonal injury is latent or a consequence of treatment. Objective: To quantify serial NfL levels in patients undergoing cellular therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective 2-center study examined plasma NfL levels in 30 patients with detailed medical and treatment history, including all major pretreatment and posttreatment risk factors. Exclusion criteria included dementia and severe, symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients' NfL levels were measured at 7 time points: baseline (prelymphodepletion), during lymphodepletion, postinfusion day (D) 1, D3, D7, D14, and D30. Prediction accuracy for the development of ICANS was next modeled using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) classification. Finally, univariate and multivariate modeling examined the association between NfL levels, ICANS, and potential risk factors including demographic (age, sex), oncologic (tumor burden, history of CNS involvement), neurologic (history of nononcologic CNS disease or neuropathy), and neurotoxic exposure histories (vincristine, cytarabine, methotrexate, or CNS radiotherapy). Results: A total of 30 patients (median [range] age, 64 [22-80] years; 12 women [40%] and 18 men [60%]) were included. Individuals who developed ICANS had elevations in NfL prior to lymphodepletion and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion compared with those who did not develop ICANS (no ICANS: 29.4 pg/mL, vs any ICANS: 87.6 pg/mL; P < .001). Baseline NfL levels further predicted ICANS development with high accuracy (area under the ROC curve, 0.96), sensitivity (0.91), and specificity (0.95). Levels of NfL remained elevated across all time points, up to 30 days postinfusion. Baseline NfL levels correlated with ICANS severity but not demographic factors, oncologic history, nononcologic neurologic history, or history of exposure to neurotoxic therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: In a subset of patients in this cross-sectional study, the risk of developing ICANS was associated with preexisting neuroaxonal injury that was quantifiable with plasma NfL level. This latent neuroaxonal injury was present prior to drug administration but was not associated with historic neurotoxic therapies or nononcologic neurologic disease. Preinfusion NfL may further permit early screening and identification of patients most at risk for ICANS. Additional studies are needed to determine NfL's utility as a predictive biomarker for early (preemptive or prophylactic) intervention and to delineate the origin of this underlying neural injury.

Prevalence and management of methotrexate-induced neurotoxicity in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma: a single-center experience.

AIMS: To determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of methotrexate (MTX) associated neurotoxicity in pediatric patients treated for osteosarcoma, with the aim of identifying possible risk factors and suggesting recommended treatment for these sequelae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All medical files of patients treated for osteosarcoma in a single pediatric haemato-oncology center between November 2011 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated according to the EURAMOS AOST0331 protocol, using cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose MTX at a dose of 12 g/m2 over 4 h. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with osteosarcoma were identified (age range 5 to 23 years, 42 males). Seven patients (9%) sustained neurotoxicity following treatment with high-dose MTX. Manifestations of neurotoxicity included among others, generalized seizures, confusion, encephalopathy, dysarthria, and choreiform movements. All but one episode occurred following two sequential cycles of high-dose MTX. All 7 had subacute toxicity, 5-10 days following MTX administration, and 1 had both acute and subacute toxicity. Brain MRI was performed for all patients and demonstrated typical MRI changes attributed to MTX neurotoxicity in 4 of them. Two patients received aminophylline; one patient received dextromethorphan. Patients with normal MRI imaging resumed MTX therapy without any sequels. No risk factors were found for high-dose MTX-related toxicity occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The time of risk of neurotoxicity due to high-dose MTX treatment for osteosarcoma is days 5-10 following two sequential treatment cycles. These findings together with treatment options for these adverse effects should be detailed in the therapeutic protocol of MTX use among pediatric patients with osteosarcoma.

Assessment of a 3D neural spheroid model to detect pharmaceutical-induced neurotoxicity.

Drug-induced neurotoxicity is a leading cause of safety-related attrition for therapeutics in clinical trials, often driven by poor predictivity of preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of neurotoxicity. Over a dozen different iPSC-derived 3D spheroids have been described in recent years, but their ability to predict neurotoxicity in patients has not been evaluated nor compared with the predictive power of nonclinical species. To assess the predictive capabilities of human iPSC-derived neural spheroids (microBrains), we used 84 structurally diverse pharmaceuticals with robust clinical and pre-clinical datasets with varying degrees of seizurogenic and neurodegenerative liability. Drug-induced changes in neural viability and phenotypic calcium bursts were assessed using 7 endpoints based on calcium oscillation profiles and cel-lular ATP levels. These endpoints, normalized by therapeutic exposure, were used to build logistic regression models to establish endpoint cutoffs and evaluate probability for clinical neurotoxicity. The neurotoxicity score calculated from the logistic regression model could distinguish neurotoxic from non-neurotoxic clinical molecules with a specificity as high as 93.33% and a sensitivity of 53.49%, demonstrating a very low false positive rate for the prediction of seizures, convulsions, and neurodegeneration. In contrast, nonclinical species showed a higher sensitivity (75%) but much lower specificity (30.4%). The neural spheroids demonstrated higher likelihood ratio positive and inverse likelihood ratio neg-ative values compared with nonclinical safety studies. This assay has the potential to be used as a predictive assay to detect neurotoxicity in early drug discovery, aiding in the early identification of compounds that eventually may fail due to neurotoxicity.

Integration of toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic new approach methods into a weight-of-evidence analysis for pesticide developmental neurotoxicity assessment: A case-study with DL- and L-glufosinate.

DL-glufosinate ammonium (DL-GLF) is a registered herbicide for which a guideline Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) study has been conducted. Offspring effects included altered brain morphometrics, decreased body weight, and increased motor activity. Guideline DNT studies are not available for its enriched isomers L-GLF acid and L-GLF ammonium; conducting one would be time consuming, resource-intensive, and possibly redundant given the existing DL-GLF DNT. To support deciding whether to request a guideline DNT study for the L-GLF isomers, DL-GLF and the L-GLF isomers were screened using in vitro assays for network formation and neurite outgrowth. DL-GLF and L-GLF isomers were without effects in both assays. DL-GLF and L-GLF (1-100 µM) isomers increased mean firing rate of mature networks to 120-140% of baseline. In vitro toxicokinetic assessments were used to derive administered equivalent doses (AEDs) for the in vitro testing concentrations. The AED for L-GLF was ∼3X higher than the NOAEL from the DL-GLF DNT indicating that the available guideline study would be protective of potential DNT due to L-GLF exposure. Based in part on the results of these in vitro studies, EPA is not requiring L-GLF isomer guideline DNT studies, thereby providing a case study for a useful application of DNT screening assays.

In vivo neurophysiological assessment of in silico predictions of neurotoxicity: Citronellal, 3,4-dichloro-1-butene, and benzyl bromoacetate.

Neurotoxicants may be widespread in the environment and can produce serious health impacts in the human population. Screening programs that use in vitro methods have generated data for thousands of chemicals. However, these methods often do not evaluate repeated or prolonged exposures, which are required for many neurotoxic outcomes. Additionally, the data produced by such screening methods may not include mechanisms which play critical biological roles necessary for in vivo neurotoxicity. The Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) in silico model focuses on chemical structure and electrophilic properties which are important to the formation of protein adducts. A group of structurally diverse chemicals have been evaluated with an in silico screening approach incorporating HSAB parameters. However, the predictions from the expanded chemical space have not been evaluated using in vivo methods. Three chemicals predicted to be cumulative toxicants were selected for in vivo neurotoxicological testing. Adult male Long-Evans rats were treated orally with citronellal (CIT), 3,4-dichloro-1-butene (DCB), or benzyl bromoacetate (BBA) for 8 weeks. Behavioral observations were recorded weekly to assess motor function. Peripheral neurophysiological measurements were derived from nerve excitability (NE) tests which involved compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in the tail and foot, and mixed nerve action potentials (MNAPs) in the tail. Compound nerve action potentials (CNAPs) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in the tail were also quantified. Peripheral inputs into the central nervous system were examined using somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortex (SEPCTX) and cerebellum (SEPCEREB). CIT or BBA did not result in significant alterations to peripheral nerve or somatosensory function. DCB reduced grip-strength and altered peripheral nerve function. The MNAPs required less current to reach 50% amplitude and had a lower calculated rheobase, suggesting increased excitability. Increased CNAP amplitudes and greater NCV were also observed. Novel changes were found in the SEPCTX with an abnormal peak forming in the early portion of the waveforms of treated rats, and decreased latencies and increased amplitudes were observed in SEPCEREB recordings. These data contribute to testing an expanded chemical space from an in silico HSAB model for predicting cumulative neurotoxicity and may assist with prioritizing chemicals to protect human health.

Incidence and management of CAR-T neurotoxicity in patients with multiple myeloma treated with ciltacabtagene autoleucel in CARTITUDE studies.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are highly effective for multiple myeloma (MM) but their impressive efficacy is associated with treatment-related neurotoxicities in some patients. In CARTITUDE-1, 5% of patients with MM reported movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. We assessed the associated factors for MNTs in CARTITUDE-1. Based on common features, patients who experienced MNTs were characterized by the presence of a combination of at least two variables: high tumor burden, grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after cilta-cel infusion, and high CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Strategies were implemented across the cilta-cel development program to monitor and manage patients with MNTs, including enhanced bridging therapy to reduce baseline tumor burden, early aggressive treatment of CRS and ICANS, handwriting assessments for early symptom detection, and extended monitoring/reporting time for neurotoxicity beyond 100 days post-infusion. After successful implementation of these strategies, the incidence of MNTs was reduced from 5% to <1% across the cilta-cel program, supporting its favorable benefit-risk profile for treatment of MM.

Imaging-based Toxicity and Response Pattern Assessment Following CAR T-Cell Therapy.

Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy is increasingly used for refractory lymphoma but may lead to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Imaging may assist in clinical management. Associations between CRS or ICANS grade and imaging findings remain not fully established. Purpose To determine associations between imaging findings and clinical grade of CRS or ICANS, evaluate response patterns, and assess imaging use following CAR T-cell treatment. Materials and Methods Patients with refractory B-cell lymphoma who received CAR T-cell infusion between 2018 and 2020 at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical CRS or ICANS toxicity grade was assessed using American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, or ASTCT, consensus grading. Thoracic and head images (radiographs, CT scans, MRI scans) were evaluated. Associations between imaging findings and clinical CRS or ICANS grade were analyzed. Wilcoxon signed-rank and χ2 tests were used to assess associations between thoracic imaging findings, clinical CRS toxicity grade, and imaging-based response. Response to therapy was evaluated according to Deauville five-point scale criteria. Results A total of 38 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 10; 23 men) who received CAR T-cell infusion were included. Of these, 24 (63% [95% CI: 48, 79]) and 11 (29% [95% CI: 14, 44]) experienced clinical grade 1 or higher CRS and ICANS, respectively. Patients with grade 2 or higher CRS were more likely to have thoracic images with abnormal findings (10 of 14 patients [71%; 95% CI: 47, 96] vs five of 24 patients [21%; 95% CI: 4, 37]; P = .002) and more likely to have imaging evidence of pleural effusions (five of 14 [36%; 95% CI: 10, 62] vs two of 24 [8.3%; 95% CI: 0, 20]; P = .04) and atelectasis (eight of 14 [57%; 95% CI: 30, 84] vs six of 24 [25%; 95% CI: 7, 43]; P = .048). Positive imaging findings were identified in three of seven patients (43%) with grade 2 or higher ICANS who underwent neuroimaging. The best treatment response included 20 of 36 patients (56% [95% CI: 39, 72]) with complete response, seven of 36 (19% [95% CI: 6, 33]) with partial response, one of 36 (2.8% [95% CI: 0, 8]) with stable disease, and eight of 36 (22% [95% CI: 8, 36]) with progressive disease. Conclusion Thoracic imaging findings, including pleural effusions and atelectasis, correlated with cytokine release syndrome grade following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion. CAR T-cell therapy yielded high response rates. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Langer in this issue.

Prospective assessment of breakthrough infections and neurotoxicity and their association with cefepime trough concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Cefepime is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in haematological cancer patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cefepime is frequently advocated. However, it remains unclear what range of concentrations should be targeted for maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. Therefore, we examined the relationship between cefepime exposure and clinical efficacy or neurotoxicity in FN patients. This prospective, observational, single-centre study included all adult hospitalised patients presenting with FN at the haematology ward and treated with cefepime from August 2019 until October 2020. Primary outcomes were incidence of breakthrough infection and neurotoxicity and their relationship with free cefepime serum trough concentrations. A total of 76 patients were included, contributing 96 cefepime treatment courses. The median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (eGFRCKD-EPI) and free cefepime trough concentration were 101 (85-112) mL/min/1.73m2 and 8.6 (4.9-16.2) mg/L, respectively. Interpatient and intrapatient variability in cefepime trough concentrations was largely explained by renal function. No cefepime-related breakthrough infections occurred during cefepime treatment. Neurotoxicity, probably induced by cefepime administration, occurred during 6/96 (6.3%) treatment courses. Patients with neurotoxicity showed a significant trend for higher trough concentrations (median 15.4 mg/L vs. 8.6 mg/L; P < 0.001). This study provides real-world clinical data showing that high cefepime dosage is efficacious and safe in FN patients. Routine TDM does not appear to be needed in FN patients with preserved renal function. However, TDM might be reserved for FN patients at high risk of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity or when intended to cover pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration >1 mg/L.

Effects of Goshajinkigan (TJ-107) for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity using the functional assessment of cancer therapy/gynecologic oncology group 12-item neurotoxicity questionnaire in a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of TJ-107 for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in prospective, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trials using the functional assessment of cancer therapy/gynecologic oncology group 12-item neurotoxicity questionnaire (FACT-GOG-NTX-12). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients who were registered to the Goshajinkigan oxaliplatin neurotoxicity evaluation study (UMIN000002211) were analyzed. A NTX-12 from the validated FACT/GOG-NTX-12 was assessed before treatment and at the end of every 2 cycles. RESULTS: The comparisons of the median scores for TJ-107 and the placebo at 8 and 26 weeks were as follows: numbness or tingling in the hands (P = 0.5820), numbness or tingling in the feet (P = 0.3236), feeling of discomfort in the hands (P = 0.8219), feeling of discomfort in the feet (P = 0.5361), joint pain or muscle cramps (P = 0.1974), feeling weak all over (P = 0.2771), trouble hearing (P = 0.2832), ringing or buzzing in ears (P = 0.1031), trouble buttoning buttons (P = 0.1653), trouble feeling the shape of small objects when held in hand (P = 0.2919), trouble walking (P = 0.5406), and pain in the hands or feet when exposed to cold temperatures (P = 0.1872). CONCLUSION: There might be no clinically significant difference between the use of TJ-107 and the severity and quality of life for patients treated with oxaliplatin.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in New Zealand: challenges and opportunities.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are a personalised cell and gene therapy for cancer that are becoming an international standard of care for some refractory B-cell leukaemias, non-Hodgkin lymphomas and myeloma. A single CAR T-cell administration can result in durable complete response for some recipients. Domestic CAR T-cell manufacturing capability was established for Aotearoa New Zealand's first CAR T-cell trial (ENABLE, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04049513). This article outlines CAR T-cell manufacturing and logistical considerations, with a focus on New Zealand's environment for this personalised cell and gene therapy. We discuss Maori engagement in CAR T-cell trial and clinical service design, and propose enhancing Maori guardianship (kaitiakitanga) over cells and genetic material through on-shore manufacture. Strategies to safely deliver CAR T-cells within New Zealand's healthcare system are outlined. Finally, we discuss challenges to, and opportunities for, widening CAR T-cell availability and assuring equity of access. Based on our experience, we consider Aotearoa New Zealand to be in an excellent position to develop and implement investigational and commercial CAR T-cell therapies in the future.

The preferences of women with ovarian cancer for oral versus intravenous recurrence regimens.

OBJECTIVE: To assess preferences of women with ovarian cancer regarding features of available anti-cancer regimens for platinum-resistant, biomarker-positive disease, with an emphasis on oral PARP inhibitor and standard intravenous (IV) chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: A discrete-choice-experiment preferences survey was designed, tested, and administered to women with ovarian cancer, with 11 pairs of treatment profiles defined using seven attributes (levels/ranges): regimen (oral daily, IV weekly, IV monthly); probability of progression-free (PFS) at 6 months (40%-60%); probability of PFS at 2 years (10%-20%); nausea (none, moderate); peripheral neuropathy (none, mild, moderate); memory problems (none, mild); and total out-of-pocket cost ($0 to $10,000). RESULTS: Of 123 participants, 38% had experienced recurrence, 25% were currently receiving chemotherapy, and 18% were currently taking a PARP inhibitor. Given attributes and levels, the relative importance weights (sum 100) were: 2-year PFS, 28; cost, 27; 6-month PFS, 19; neuropathy,14; memory problems, nausea, and regimen, all ≤5. To accept moderate neuropathy, participants required a 49% (versus 40%) chance of PFS at 6 months or 14% (versus 10%) chance at 2 years. Given a 3-way choice where PFS and cost were equal, 49% preferred a monthly IV regimen causing mild memory problems, 47% preferred an oral regimen causing moderate nausea, and 4% preferred a weekly IV regimen causing mild memory and mild neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the assumption that oral anti-cancer therapies are universally preferred by patients and demonstrate that there is no "one size fits all" regimen that is preferable to women with ovarian cancer when considering recurrence treatment regimens.

Biochemical assessment of the neurotoxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with colorectal cancer-targeting peptides in a rat model.

The application of gold nanoparticle-peptide conjugates as theranostic agents for colorectal cancer shows much promise. This study aimed at determining the neurotoxic impact of 14 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) functionalized with colorectal cancer-targeting peptides (namely p.C, p.L or p.14) in a rat model. Brain tissue samples, obtained from Wistar rats that received a single injection of citrate-capped AuNPs, polyethylene glycol-coated (PEG) AuNPs, p.C-PEG-AuNPs, p.L-PEG-AuNPs or p.14-PEG-AuNPs, and sacrificed after 2- and 12-weeks, respectively, were analysed. Inflammation marker (tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, interleukin-1ß), oxidative stress (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase) and apoptotic biomarker (cytochrome c, caspase-3) levels were measured. Gold nanoparticle-treated groups sacrificed after 2-weeks did not exhibit any significant inflammatory, oxidative stress or apoptotic effects in brain tissue compared to the untreated control group. In brain tissue from rats that were exposed to citrate-capped AuNPs for 12-weeks, tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 levels were significantly increased compared to the untreated control. Exposure to PEG-AuNP, p.C-PEG-AuNP, p.L-PEG-AuNP and p.14-PEG-AuNP did not elicit significant toxic effects compared to the control after 12-weeks, as evidenced by the absence of inflammatory, oxidative stress and apoptotic effects in brain tissue. We thus report on the safety of PEG-coated AuNP-peptide conjugates for potential application in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer; however, exposure to citrate-capped AuNPs could induce delayed neuro-inflammation, and as such, warrants further investigation.

The updated five-year overall survival and long-term oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity assessment of the FACOS study.

PURPOSE: We previously reported the first evidence of oncological benefits from a Japanese phase II trial of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer (the FACOS study). We herein report the long-term survival and persistent oxaliplatin-related peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) for patients enrolled in this trial. METHODS: Patients were scheduled to receive the mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX regimen in the adjuvant setting. The five-year overall survival (OS) rate and persistent PSN were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients (mFOLFOX6, n = 73; CAPOX, n = 57) were eligible. The 5-year OS rate was 91.4%. No significant difference in the OS rate was observed between regimens (mFOLFOX6, 94.4%; CAPOX, 87.4%; P = 0.25). The incidence of PSN during adjuvant treatment was 55.4% in grade 1 (G1), 30.0% in G2, and 4.6% in G3. No patients showed G3 PSN at 12 months, but G1 or G2 residual PSN after 5 years was observed in 21.8% (G1, 20%; G2, 1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Updated results from the FACOS study support the benefits of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of the long-term survival among Japanese patients with stage III colon cancer. However, long-term persistent PSN occurs in about 20% of survivors, counterbalancing the favorable OS.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) natural killer (NK)-cell therapy: leveraging the power of innate immunity.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are a rapidly emerging form of cancer treatment, and have resulted in remarkable responses in refractory lymphoid malignancies. However, their widespread clinical use is limited by toxicity related to cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, the logistic complexity of their manufacturing, cost and time-to-treatment for autologous CAR-T cells, and the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) associated with allogeneic CAR-T cells. Natural killer (NK) cells have emerged as a promising source of cells for CAR-based therapies due to their ready availability and safety profile. NK cells are part of the innate immune system, providing the first line of defence against pathogens and cancer cells. They produce cytokines and mediate cytotoxicity without the need for prior sensitisation and have the ability to interact with, and activate other immune cells. NK cells for immunotherapy can be generated from multiple sources, such as expanded autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, haematopoietic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, as well as cell lines. Genetic engineering of NK cells to express a CAR has shown impressive preclinical results and is currently being explored in multiple clinical trials. In the present review, we discuss both the preclinical and clinical trial progress made in the field of CAR NK-cell therapy, and the strategies to overcome the challenges encountered.

Associations of the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS) neurobehavioral outcomes with attention problems in children living near coal ash storage sites.

Environmental exposures have been linked to childhood problems with overactivity, attention, and impulse control, and an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis. Two approaches to identify these types of exposure-related neurobehavioral problems include the use of computerized tests, such as the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS), as well as the use of behavior rating scales. To assess comparability of these two types of measures, we analyzed data from 281 children aged 6 to 14 years enrolled in a 5-year research study investigating coal ash exposure and neurobehavioral health. All children lived in proximity of coal ash storage sites. We administered six computer tests from the BARS and obtained behavior measures from the parent-completed Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) ADHD DSM oriented scale. BARS test performance was associated with age indicating that the tests could be used to evaluate neurodevelopmental changes over time or across a wide age range. Tests within the BARS including Continuous Performance (CPT) false alarm (standardized estimate 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.67, 2.48), adjusted p = 0.006), Selective Attention (SAT) wrong count (standardized estimate 2.8, 95% CI (1.17, 4.44), adjusted p = 0.006), and SAT proportion correct (standardized estimate -2.45, 95% CI (-4.01, -0.88), adjusted p = 0.01) were associated with attention and impulse control problems on the CBCL after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Findings support that the BARS can contribute to research on environmental exposures by assessing subclinical behaviors related to ADHD such as sustained attention, impulse control, response inhibition, associative learning, and short-term memory. Future research can examine relationships of these BARS measures with biomarkers of neurotoxic exposures related to living near coal ash storage sites to better identify the potential risk for ADHD-related behaviors among children living near coal ash storage sites.