Association between diabetes and subsequent malignancy risk among older breast cancer survivors.

Type II diabetes is associated with cancer risk in the general population but has not been well studied as a risk factor for subsequent malignancies among cancer survivors. We investigated the association between diabetes and subsequent cancer risk among older (66-84 years), 1-year breast cancer survivors within the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database using Cox regression analyses to quantify hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Among 133 324 women, 29.3% were diagnosed with diabetes before or concurrent with their breast cancer diagnosis, and 10 452 women developed subsequent malignancies over a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Diabetes was statistically significantly associated with liver (HR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.48 to 3.74), brain (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.26 to 2.96), and thyroid cancer risks (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.89). Future studies are needed to better understand the spectrum of subsequent cancers associated with diabetes and the role of diabetes medications in modifying subsequent cancer risk, alone or in combination with cancer treatments.

Assessment of second primary malignancies among treated and untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia using real-world data from the USA.

Aim: Improved management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has resulted in a growing population of CLL survivors; these patients have a higher risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs) versus the general population. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the timing, frequency, incidence and types of SPMs in treated and untreated patients with CLL in the USA, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database, which links a nationally representative cancer registry with Medicare claims data. Patients & methods: Patients aged ≥66 years with newly diagnosed CLL between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, who were enrolled in Parts A and B of Medicare for ≥12 months pre-diagnosis of CLL were selected from the database. Patients were assessed for ≥36 months until the end of continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B and D, a switch to a health maintenance organization, death, or end of the study period (December 2019). Results: Of 3053 patients included in the analyses, 620 (20.3%) were treated and 2433 (79.7%) were untreated within 36 months of diagnosis. Overall, 638 (20.9%) patients developed a SPM, 26.8% of patients in the treated cohort and 19.4% of patients in the untreated cohort. The most common SPMs for both cohorts were squamous cell carcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Among the 166 treated patients who developed a SPM, a greater proportion developed their first SPM after treatment initiation versus those who developed their first SPM prior to treatment initiation (p < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of patients who received targeted therapy developed a SPM (p < 0.05) versus patients treated with anti-CD20 + chemotherapy. Conclusion: Findings indicate that treatment type and timing can affect SPM development in patients with CLL. Combined with previous findings, this can help inform best practices in monitoring for SPM in patients with CLL.

Comparing Risk for Second Primary Cancers After Intensity-Modulated vs 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer, 2002-2015.

Importance: Compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can spare nearby tissue but may result in increased scatter radiation to distant normal tissue, including red bone marrow. It is unclear whether second primary cancer risk varies by radiotherapy type. Objective: To evaluate whether radiotherapy type (IMRT vs 3DCRT) is associated with second primary cancer risk among older men treated for prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study of a linked database of Medicare claims and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program population-based cancer registries (2002-2015), male patients aged 66 to 84 diagnosed with a first primary nonmetastatic prostate cancer from 2002 to 2013, as reported to SEER, and who received radiotherapy (IMRT and/or 3DCRT without proton therapy) within the first year following prostate cancer were identified. The data were analyzed from January 2022 through June 2022. Exposure: Receipt of IMRT and 3DCRT, based on Medicare claims. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between radiotherapy type and development of a subsequent hematologic cancer at least 2 years after prostate cancer diagnosis or a subsequent solid cancer at least 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional regression. Results: The study included 65 235 2-year first primary prostate cancer survivors (median [range] age, 72 [66-82] years; 82.2% White patients) and 45 811 5-year survivors with similar demographic characteristics (median [range] age, 72 [66-79] years; 82.4% White patients). Among 2-year prostate cancer survivors (median [range] follow-up, 4.6 [0.003-12.0] years), 1107 second hematologic cancers were diagnosed (IMRT, 603; 3DCRT, 504). Radiotherapy type was not associated with second hematologic cancers overall or any specific types evaluated. Among 5-year survivors (median [range] follow-up, 3.1 [0.003-9.0] years), 2688 men were diagnosed with a second primary solid cancer (IMRT, 1306; 3DCRT, 1382). The overall HR for IMRT vs 3DCRT was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.99). This inverse association was restricted to the earlier calendar year period of prostate cancer diagnosis (HR2002-2005 = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94; HR2006-2010 = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96-1.36), with a similar pattern observed for colon cancer (HR2002-2005 = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.94; HR2006-2010 = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.59-1.88). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this large, population-based cohort study suggest that IMRT for prostate cancer is not associated with an increased risk of second primary cancers, either solid or hematologic, and any inverse associations may be associated with calendar year of treatment.

Clinical and sociodemographic risk factors associated with the development of second primary cancers among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Advancement in breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment have increased the number of long-term survivors. Consequently, primary BC survivors are at a greater risk of developing second primary cancers (SPCs). The risk factors for SPCs among BC survivors including sociodemographic characteristics, cancer treatment, comorbidities, and concurrent medications have not been comprehensively examined. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence and clinicopathologic factors associated with risk of SPCs in BC survivors. METHODS: We analyzed 171, 311 women with early-stage primary BC diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2015 from the Medicare-linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER-Medicare) database. SPC was defined as any diagnosis of malignancy occurring within the study period and at least 6 months after primary BC diagnosis. Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics between those who developed a SPC and those who did not. We evaluated the cause-specific hazard of developing a SPC in the presence of death as a competing risk. RESULTS: Of the study cohort, 21,510 (13%) of BC survivors developed a SPC and BC was the most common SPC type (28%). The median time to SPC was 44 months. Women who were white, older, and with fewer comorbidities were more likely to develop a SPC. While statins [hazard ratio (HR) 1.066 (1.023-1.110)] and anti-hypertensives [HR 1.569 (1.512-1.627)] increased the hazard of developing a SPC, aromatase inhibitor therapy [HR 0.620 (0.573-0.671)] and bisphosphonates [HR 0.905 (0.857-0.956)] were associated with a decreased hazard of developing any SPC, including non-breast SPCs. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that specific clinical factors including type of cancer treatment, medications, and comorbidities are associated with increased risk of developing SPCs among older BC survivors. These results can increase patient and clinician awareness, target cancer screening among BC survivors, as well as developing risk-adapted management strategies.

Assessment of Second Primary Cancer Risk Among Men Receiving Primary Radiotherapy vs Surgery for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Importance: Shared decision-making is an important part of the treatment selection process among patients with prostate cancer. Updated information is needed regarding the long-term incidence and risk of second primary cancer after radiotherapy vs nonradiotherapy treatments, which may help to inform discussions of risks and benefits for men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Objective: To assess the current incidence and risk of developing a second primary cancer after receipt of radiotherapy vs nonradiotherapy treatments for prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse to identify 154 514 male veterans 18 years and older who had localized prostate cancer (tumor stages T1-T3) diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, and no cancer history. A total of 10 628 patients were excluded because of (1) incomplete treatment information for the year after diagnosis, (2) receipt of both radiotherapy and a surgical procedure in the year after diagnosis, (3) receipt of radiotherapy more than 1 year after diagnosis, (4) occurrence of second primary cancer or death within 1 year or less after diagnosis, (5) prostate-specific antigen value greater than 99 ng/mL within 6 months before diagnosis, or (6) no recorded Veterans Health Administration service after diagnosis. The remaining 143 886 patients included in the study had a median (IQR) follow-up of 9 (6-13) years. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2021, to May 22, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnosis of a second primary cancer more than 1 year after prostate cancer diagnosis. Results: Among 143 886 male veterans (median [IQR] age, 65 [60-71] years) with localized prostate cancer, 750 (0.5%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 389 (0.3%) were Asian, 37 796 (26.3%) were Black or African American, 933 (0.6%) were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 91 091 (63.3%) were White, and 12 927 (9.0%) were of unknown race; 7299 patients (5.1%) were Hispanic or Latino, 128 796 (89.5%) were not Hispanic or Latino, and 7791 (5.4%) were of unknown ethnicity. A total of 52 886 patients (36.8%) received primary radiotherapy, and 91 000 (63.2%) did not. A second primary cancer more than 1 year after prostate cancer diagnosis was present in 4257 patients (3.0%), comprising 1955 patients (3.7%) in the radiotherapy cohort and 2302 patients (2.5%) in the nonradiotherapy cohort. In the multivariable analyses, patients in the radiotherapy cohort had a higher risk of second primary cancer compared with those in the nonradiotherapy cohort at years 1 to 5 after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.13-1.37; P < .001), with higher adjusted HRs in the subsequent 15 years (years 5-10: 1.50 [95% CI, 1.36-1.65; P < .001]; years 10-15: 1.59 [95% CI, 1.37-1.84; P < .001]; years 15-20: 1.47 [95% CI, 1.08-2.01; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with prostate cancer who received radiotherapy were more likely to develop a second primary cancer than patients who did not receive radiotherapy, with increased risk over time. Although the incidence and risk of developing a second primary cancer were low, it is important to discuss the risk with patients during shared decision-making about prostate cancer treatment options.

The association between physical health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and risk of contralateral breast cancer among older women.

BACKGROUND: Physical limitations prior to cancer diagnosis may lead to suboptimal health outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the impacts of poor physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical functioning (PF) on the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study of women with invasive unilateral breast cancer (UBC) who did not receive prophylactic contralateral mastectomy using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data resource. Among 2938 women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with first stage I-III UBC between 1997 and 2011, we identified 100 subsequent CBC cases and 915 matched controls without CBC using incidence density sampling without replacement. Pre-diagnosis physical HRQOL and PF were determined using Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form-36 (SF-36)/Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) responses within 2 years prior to first UBC diagnosis. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: Cases and controls were similar with respect to comorbidities, stage, surgery, and radiation treatments, but differed by hormone receptor status (ER/PR-negative, 23% and 11%, respectively) of first UBC. Cases had modestly lower mean pre-diagnosis physical HRQOL (- 1.8) and PF (- 2.2) scores. In multivariable models, we observed an increased CBC risk associated with low physical HRQOL (lowest vs. highest quartile, OR = 1.8; 95% CI 0.8-4.3), but CIs included 1.0. Low PF was associated with a 2.7-fold (95% CI 1.1-6.7) increased CBC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that low physical HRQOL, specifically poor PF, is associated with CBC risk. Efforts to understand and minimize declines in PF post-breast cancer are well motivated.

Increased Incidence of Human Papillomavirus-Related Precancer or Second Malignancy Among Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A SEER-Medicare Population Study.

Each year, more than 8000 allogeneic stem cell transplantations (allo-SCT) are performed in the United States, with approximately 30% of these patients age ≥60 years. Allo-SCT recipients are at increased risk for developing human papillomavirus (HPV)-related precancer or second malignancy. It is important to evaluate HPV-related precancer or second malignancy among allo-SCT recipients to develop or enhance screening and preventive practice guidelines to improve patients' survival and quality of life. In this retrospective matched case-control study, we estimated the cumulative incidence of HPV-related precancer or second malignancy in both male and female Medicare beneficiaries who underwent allo-SCT and compared it with the cumulative incidence in non-SCT controls and noncancer controls. Hematologic cancer patients age ≥18 years who underwent allo-SCT between 2002 and 2011 were matched 1:5 to non-SCT controls and to noncancer controls by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and duration of follow-up. Proportions of HPV-related precancer or second malignancy were estimated and compared between cases and controls using the chi-square test and logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidences were estimated and compared using log-rank tests. We identified 700 allo-SCT cases (median age, 64 years; median follow-up post-transplantation, 4.3 years) matched with 3159 non-SCT controls and 3302 noncancer controls. Approximately 3.7% of allo-SCT cases developed HPV-related precancer or second malignancy post-transplantation, compared with 1.9% of the non-SCT controls and 1.1% of the noncancer controls. The odds ratio of developing HPV-related precancer or second malignancy of allo-SCT cases compared with non-SCT controls and noncancer controls was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 3.18) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.8), respectively. Both allo-SCT cases and non-SCT controls had significantly higher proportions and odds of developing HPV-related precancer or second malignancy compared with noncancer controls. The 5-year cumulative incidence in allo-SCT cases was 5%, compared with 2.1% in non-SCT controls and 1.2% in noncancer controls. The cumulative incidence of HPV-related precancer or second malignancy was statistically significantly higher in the allo-SCT than in either of the 2 matched control groups, and the non-SCT controls had a higher cumulative incidence of HPV-related precancer or second malignancy than the noncancer controls. The allo-SCT cases were at increased risk of developing HPV-related precancer or second malignancy compared with the non-SCT controls and noncancer controls. Routine screening of HPV-related precancer or second malignancy in allo-SCT recipients is needed to help prevent HPV-related precancer or second malignancy. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Second primary malignancy among older adults with multiple myeloma receiving first-line lenalidomide-based therapy: A population-based analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials have suggested that patients with myeloma treated with lenalidomide may have an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM). Whether such risks are of significant relevance in the real-world clinical practice, particularly among older patients receiving first-line lenalidomide based therapy, remains unclear. METHODS: Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, we identified adults ≥ 65 years with plasma cell myeloma diagnosed in 2007-2015 who received at least one oral anti-myeloma agent. We defined first-line lenalidomide-containing therapy as use within 90 days of diagnosis. SPM was defined as a malignancy reported to a cancer registry > 90 days after myeloma diagnosis. We computed cumulative incidence of SPM (with death being a competing event) and compared SPM rates between patients treated with or without first-line lenalidomide using a Fine-Gray's model, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, prior malignancy, and histologic subtype. RESULTS: Of 9850 Medicare beneficiaries, 4009 (41%) received first-line lenalidomide. During median follow up of 5.0 years, 423 patients (4.3%) developed SPM, including 361 solid tumors (85%) and 61 hematologic malignancies (14%). The cumulative incidence of any SPM at 5 years was similar among those who received first-line lenalidomide and those who did not (5.3% vs 4.4%; sub-hazard ratio, SHR 1.06, P = .53). Consistent results were seen in the risk of solid tumor (4.7% vs 3.6%; SHR 1.13, P = .24) or hematologic malignancy (4.7 vs 3.6%, SHR 0.73; P = .72). CONCLUSION: First-line lenalidomide therapy among older adults with myeloma was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any SPM.

Population-based risk assessment of second primary cancers following a first head and neck cancer: patterns of association and difficulties of its analysis.

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of a second primary cancer (SPC) is a major concern in the follow-up of survivors of a primary head and neck cancer (HNC), but the anatomic subsites in the head and neck area are close, making it difficult to distinguish a SPC of a recurrence and therefore register it correctly. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from two population-based cancer registries in Catalonia, Spain: the Tarragona Cancer Registry and the Girona Cancer Registry. All patients diagnosed with HNC during the period 1994-2013 were registered and followed-up to collect cases of SPC. We analysed the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the excess absolute risk (EAR) to determine the risk of second malignancies following a prior HNC. RESULTS: 923 SPC were found in a cohort of 5646 patients diagnosed of a first head and neck cancer. Men had an increased risk of a SPC with a SIR of 2.22 and an EAR of 216.76. Women also had an increased risk with a SIR of 2.02 and an EAR of 95.70. We show the risk for different tumour sites and discuss the difficulties of the analysis. CONCLUSION: The risks of a SPC following a prior HNC in Tarragona and Girona are similar to those previously found in other similar cohorts. It would appear to be advisable to make a revision of the international rules of classification of multiple tumours, grouping the sites of head and neck area with new aetiological criteria to better determine and interpret the risks of SPC obtained in these studies.

Assessment of Trends in Second Primary Cancers in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma From 2005 to 2016.

Importance: To date, the risk of developing second primary cancers (SPCs) after the first primary melanoma has not been studied in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Objective: To assess differences in the risk of SPCs in patients with primary melanoma before (2005-2010) and after (2011-2016) the introduction and approval of ICIs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from January 2005 to December 2016 of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma. Data were analyzed from January 4 to June 30, 2020. Exposures: Receipt of immunotherapy or other anticancer agents. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the development of second primary cancers in patients with melanoma. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for the development of SPCs before and after the introduction of ICIs. Results: Among 5016 patients with diagnosed metastatic melanoma, 2888 (58%) were younger than 65 years at the time of diagnosis, and 3441 (69%) were male. From 2005 to 2010, SIRs were 3.24 (95% CI, 0.08-18.04) for small intestine cancer, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.14-3.05) for lung and bronchus cancer, 2.77 (95% CI, 1.02-6.03) for kidney cancer, and 7.29 (95% CI, 2.93-15.02) for myeloma. From 2011 to 2016, SIRs were 9.23 (95% CI, 1.12-33.35) for small intestine cancer, 1.54 (95% CI, 0.71-2.93) for lung and bronchus cancer, 2.66 (95% CI, 0.73-6.82) for kidney cancer, and 5.90 (95% CI, 1.61-15.10) for myeloma. The overall risk of developing SPCs in individuals who survived the first primary melanoma was 65% higher (SIR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.35-2.00) in the pre-ICIs period and 98% higher (SIR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.57-2.45) in the post-ICIs period than the overall cancer incidence rate in the general population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, an increase in the overall risk of second primary cancers after melanoma after the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed. The pattern of SPCs has been altered in the era of systemic therapy. Close monitoring and screening for SPCs may be warranted in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Calculating and estimating second cancer risk from breast radiotherapy using Monte Carlo code with internal body scatter for each out-of-field organ.

Out-of-field organs are not commonly designated as dose calculation targets during radiation therapy treatment planning, but they might entail risks of second cancer. Risk components include specific internal body scatter, which is a dominant source of out-of-field doses, and head leakage, which can be reduced by external shielding. Our simulation study quantifies out-of-field organ doses and estimates second cancer risks attributable to internal body scatter in whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without additional regional nodal radiotherapy (RNRT), respectively, for right and left breast cancer using Monte Carlo code PHITS. Simulations were conducted using a complete whole-body female model. Second cancer risk was estimated using the calculated doses with a concept of excess absolute risk. Simulation results revealed marked differences between WBRT alone and WBRT plus RNRT in out-of-field organ doses. The ratios of mean doses between them were as large as 3.5-8.0 for the head and neck region and about 1.5-6.6 for the lower abdominal region. Potentially, most out-of-field organs had excess absolute risks of less than 1 per 10,000 persons-year. Our study surveyed the respective contributions of internal body scatter to out-of-field organ doses and second cancer risks in breast radiotherapy on this intact female model.

Risk of second primary breast cancer among cancer survivors: Implications for prevention and screening practice.

Second primary breast cancer (SPBC) is becoming one of the major obstacles to breast cancer (BC) control. This study was aimed to determine the trend of SPBC incidence over time and the risk of developing SPBC in site-specific primary cancer survivors in the United States. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 13 registry (1992-2015) was used to identify SPBC patients with previous malignancies. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was computed to compare the incidence rates of the observed cases of SPBC in cancer survivors over the expected cases in the general population. Elevated risk of SPBC was observed in women with previous BC (SIR = 1.74) or thyroid cancer (SIR = 1.17). Women with initial skin melanoma in older age (≥50 years) (SIR = 1.11), or White race (SIR = 1.11) presented an elevated incidence of SPBC than the general female population. Besides, Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women with cancer of corpus uteri, ovary, bladder, or kidney were prone to developing SPBC when compared with the general population, with SIRs of 1.61, 1.35, 1.48, and 1.70, respectively. Male BC patients showed profound risk of developing SPBC (SIR = 34.86). Male leukemia patients also presented elevated risk of developing SPBC (SIR = 2.06). Our study suggests significant increase of SPBC in both sexes in the United States. Elevated risk of SPBC exists in survivors with primary BC, female thyroid cancer, male leukemia, and API female cancer patients with primary genitourinary cancer. Our study is helpful in developing strategies for BC control and prevention on specific first primary cancer survivors with an elevated risk of SPBC.

Outcomes of bendamustine- or cyclophosphamide-based first-line chemotherapy in older patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma.

Clinical trials comparing bendamustine/rituximab (BR) with cyclophosphamide-based regimens (RCHOP/RCVP) have pooled various histologies of indolent B-cell lymphomas. We examined real-life outcomes of older patients with follicular (FL), mantle cell (MCL), or marginal zone/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (MZL/LPL), treated with these first-line regimens. We identified Medicare beneficiaries with FL, MCL, or MZL/LPL, who received either first-line BR or RCHOP/RCVP in 2009-2016, and matched groups using a propensity score. Outcomes of claims-based event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, secondary cancers, and costs were compared in the aggregate cohort (N = 2736), and in separately matched histology-specific subcohorts. In the aggregate cohort, EFS was better with BR than with RCHOP/RCVP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.87). Acute toxicity was lower with BR, including rates of hospitalizations (33% vs 45%), infections (21% vs 30%), cardiovascular events, and transfusions, yet OS did not differ (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91-1.17) and Medicare spending was higher. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of secondary cancers (subhazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83-1.48). The EFS advantage of BR was pronounced in MCL (N = 690; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76), but less so in FL (N = 1330; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98) and absent in MZL/LPL (N = 574; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17). Despite improved EFS and lower toxicity, the shift from RCHOP/RCVP to BR in clinical practice did not improve OS for older patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas. Frequent infections and hospitalizations underscore the need for safer treatment approaches in this population. Secondary cancers do not appear to be increased after BR compared with RCHOP/RCVP.

Quality-of-life assessment in French patients with metastatic melanoma in real life.

BACKGROUND: Significant progress was recently observed in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM). With >50% of patients now reaching a second line of treatment and a significant improvement in the survival rate, an assessment of quality of life (QoL) during the whole course of the disease becomes necessary. The objective of this study was to describe the QoL of patients with MM in France, from their diagnosis of advanced disease to their death, in real life. METHODS: QoL data were collected through MelBase, a prospective, French, multicentric cohort dedicated to the follow-up of adults with MM. QoL was assessed using the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT)-Melanoma questionnaire at the time of study inclusion, every 3 months, and at the time of each treatment change until death. To assess longitudinal changes from baseline to death, mixed-effect models for repeated-measures analyses were used to control for baseline covariates. RESULTS: QoL was assessed in 1435 patients who were included in the study between 2013 and 2018. The median follow-up was 9.4 months, and 47% of patients died during follow-up. During first-line treatment, the model-based, mean utility score was 0.830 (95% CI, 0.818-0.843), the mean FACT-General score was 77.22 (95% CI, 76.23-78.22), and the mean FACT-Melanoma score was 129.46 (95% CI, 128.02-130.90). At the time of a change in treatment line, there was a decrease of -0.027 (95% CI, -0.03, -0.02) in the utility score, -1.82 (95% CI, -1.88, -1.76) in the FACT-General score, and -2.98 (95% CI, -3.05, -2.91) in the FACT-Melanoma score compared with first-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the MelBase cohort, the QoL among patients with MM seems to be fairly stable over the whole disease course, although a small but significant decrease at time therapy is changed is observed.

Socioeconomic Status-Related Parameters as Predictors of Competing (Non-Bladder Cancer) Mortality after Radical Cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of socioeconomic status-related parameters on competing (non-bladder cancer) mortality after radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,268 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial or undifferentiated bladder cancer at our institution between 1993 and 2016 with a mean age of 69 years (median 70 years) were studied. The mean -follow-up of the censored patients was 7.2 years (median 5.7 years). Proportional hazard models for competing risk were used to identify predictors of non-bladder cancer (competing) mortality. The following parameters were included into multivariate analyses: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, Charlson score, gender, level of education, smoking status, marital status, local tumour stage, lymph node status, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Besides age and both comorbidity classifications, the socioeconomic status-related parameters gender (female versus male, hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84, p = 0.0042), level of education (university degree or master craftsman versus others, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-0.1.03, p = 0.0801), smoking status (current smoking versus others, HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.96, p = 0.0085) and marital status (married versus others, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92, p = 0.0133) were independent predictors of competing mortality after radical cystectomy. If considered in combination (multiplication of HRs), the prognostic impact of socioeconomic parameters superseded that of the investigated comorbidity classifications. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic status-related parameters may provide important information on the long-term competing mortality risk after radical cystectomy supplementary to chronological age and comorbidity.

Two for the price of one: Prevalence, demographics and treatment implications of multiple HPV mediated Head and Neck Cancers.

OBJECTIVES: HPV mediated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HPVmHNSCC) is increasing in prevalence in the United States, as are reports of patients with multiple HPVmHNSCCs. The prevalence, demographics, and treatment implications of this emerging clinical entity are poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multitiered assessment of patients with multiple HPVmHNSCC including: 1. systematic review of the literature, 2. query of the 2017 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and 3. institutional level reporting at two high volume academic centers. RESULTS: Systematic literature review: 13 articles met inclusion criteria (48 patients with multiple HPVmHNSCC). Pooled prevalence rate of multiple HPVmHNSCC was 2.64%. SEER database: 60(0.95%) patients with HPVmHNSCC had two tumors. Patients with multiple HPVmHNSCC were more likely to be younger and present with a lower T and N stage (p < 0.025 for all). The second identified tumor was more likely to be contralateral, found synchronously, of smaller size, and to occur in the tonsil (p < 0.05 for all). Institutional reporting: 17(1.69%) patients with HPVmHNSCC had two primary tumors. Similar to the SEER database, patients with multiple HPVmHNSCC were more likely to present with a low T stage and tonsil location (p < 0.007 for both). CONCLUSION: Multiple HPVmHNSCCs occur in a subset of HPVmHNSCC cases with distinct characteristics. Thorough interrogation of all oropharyngeal subsites should be performed as part of the initial workup for HPVmHNSCC, with consideration given to contralateral tonsillectomy at the time of surgical resection for HPV mediated tonsil cancers due to the prevalence of contralateral tonsil primaries.

Estimation of effective imaging dose and excess absolute risk of secondary cancer incidence for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography acquisition.

This study was conducted to estimate the organ equivalent dose and effective imaging dose for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) using a Monte Carlo simulation, and to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer incidence. The EGSnrc/BEAMnrc were used to simulate the on-board imager (OBI) from the TrueBeam linear accelerator. Specifically, the OBI was modeled based on the percent depth dose and the off-center ratio was measured using a three-dimensional (3D) water phantom. For clinical cases, 15 lung and liver cancer patients were simulated using the EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc. The mean absorbed doses to the lung, stomach, bone marrow, esophagus, liver, thyroid, bone surface, skin, adrenal glands, gallbladder, heart, intestine, kidney, pancreas and spleen, were quantified using a treatment planning system, and the equivalent doses to each organ were calculated. Subsequently, the effective dose was calculated as the weighted sum of the equivalent dose, and the EAR of the secondary cancer incidence was determined for each organ with the use of the biologic effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR) VII model. The effective doses were 3.9 ± 0.5, 15.7 ± 2.0, and 7.3 ± 0.9 mSv, for the lung, and 4.2 ± 0.6, 16.7 ± 2.4, and 7.8 ± 1.1 mSv, for the liver in the respective cases of the 3D-CBCT (thorax, pelvis) and 4D-CBCT modes. The lung EARs for males and females were 7.3 and 10.7 cases per million person-years, whereas the liver EARs were 9.9 and 4.5 cases per million person-years. The EAR increased with increasing time since radiation exposure. In clinical studies, we should use 4D-CBCT based on consideration of the effective dose and EAR of secondary cancer incidence.