Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.624
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Psychiatr Serv ; 70(11): 1027-1033, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31480928

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Since 2010, the Affordable Care Act has required private health plans to extend dependent coverage to adults up to age 26. Because psychosis often begins in young adulthood, expanded private insurance benefits may affect early psychosis treatment. The authors examined changes in insurance coverage and hospital-based service use among young adults with psychosis before and after this change. METHODS: The study included a national sample (2006-2013) of discharges and emergency department visits. Using a difference-in-differences study design, the authors compared changes in insurance coverage (measured as payer source), per capita admissions, and 30-day readmissions for psychosis before and after ACA dependent coverage expansion among targeted individuals (ages 20-25) and a comparison group (ages 27-29). RESULTS: After dependent coverage expansion, hospitalization for psychosis among young adults was 5.8 percentage points more likely to be reimbursed by private insurance among the targeted age group (ages 20-25), compared with the slightly older age group (ages 27-29). Dependent coverage expansion was not associated with changes in overall insurance coverage, per capita admissions, or 30-day readmission for psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although dependent coverage expansion was unrelated to changes in use of hospital-based treatments for psychosis among young adults, care was more likely to be covered by private insurance, and coverage of these hospitalizations by public insurance decreased. This shift from public to private insurance may reduce public spending on young-adult treatments for early-episode psychosis but may leave young adults without coverage for rehabilitation services.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Transtornos Psicóticos/economia , Transtornos Psicóticos/reabilitação , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 34(1): e917-e933, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Provider payment mechanisms (PPMs) play a critical role in universal health coverage due to the incentives they create for health care providers to deliver needed services, quality, and efficiency. We set out to explore public, private, and faith-based providers' experiences with capitation and fee-for-service in Kenya and identified attributes of PPMs that providers considered important. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in two counties in Kenya. Data were collected using semistructured interviews with 29 management team members in six health providers accredited by the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF). RESULTS: Capitation and fee-for-service payments from the NHIF and private insurers were reported as good revenue sources as they contributed to providers' overall income. The expected fee-for-service payment amounts from NHIF and private insurers were predictable while capitation funds from NHIF were not because providers did not have information on the number of enrolees in their capitation pool. Moreover, capitation payment rates were perceived as inadequate. Capitation and fee-for-service payments from NHIF and private insurers were disbursed late. Finally, public providers had lost their autonomy to access and utilise capitation and fee-for-service payments from the NHIF. CONCLUSION: Through their experiences, health care providers revealed characteristics of PPMs that they considered important.


Assuntos
Capitação , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Pessoal de Saúde , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estudos Transversais , Gastos em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização , Entrevistas como Assunto , Quênia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde
4.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(5): 779-787, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426595

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery is an effective procedure for morbidly obese patients when all else fails. The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) for two surgical procedures, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: This study was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009 to 2014. Patients who received bariatric surgery as indicated by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes were selected (N = 4001). Cases were limited to uncomplicated diabetic patients. Differences in the odds of long vs short (2< and ≥2) stay for a patient receiving LSG were compared with LAGB while adjusting for hospital volume, hospital size, patient age, gender, ethnicity, season, and year using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The odds for LSG (odds ratio [OR] = 0.100, 0.066-0.150, P < 0.001) patients for long LOS are lower when compared with LAGB. In the stratified logistic regression model, both male (OR = 0.157, 0.074-0.333, P < 0.001) and female (OR = 0.077, 0.046-0.127, P < 0.001) had reduced odds of extended LOS for LSG. Discharged patients in the year 2012 (OR = 0.660, 0.536-0.813, P < 0.001) had decreased odds of having a longer LOS when compared with the year 2014. Both government, nonfederal (OR = 0.452, 0.251-0.816, P = 0.008), and private investor-owned (OR = 0.421, 0.244-0.726, P < 0.001) patients had similar odds for long duration of stay when compared with government or private. Urban non-teaching (OR = 1.954, 1.653-2.310, P < 0.001) patients had higher odds for long LOS in comparison with urban teaching. New England patients' (OR = 0.365, 0.232-0.576, P < 0.001) odds for extended LOS were lower when compared with pacific. Both patients who received care in low (OR = 1.330, 1.109-1.595, P = 0.002) and medium (OR = 1.639, 1.130-2.377, P = 0.009) volume hospital had increased odds for long duration of stay. Female patients in the stratified logistic regression model with high (OR = 1.330, 1.109-1.595, P < 0.002) volume had elevated odds of extended LOS when compared with very low volume hospital. CONCLUSION: Among the uncomplicated diabetic patients, LSG provides a substantially low odds of extended LOS after adjusting for covariates when compared with LAGB. The finding of the relative reduction in LOS for LSG suggests opportunities for improvement both for cost reduction for third party insurance payers and greater efficacy and outcomes for patients.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/classificação , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
5.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 37(5): 447-451, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572099

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The constant development of ambulatory surgery (AS) raises the problem of monitoring patients after discharge and the risk of death in the case of delays in the management of a serious complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the deaths observed within the 30-day period following AS declared to the SHAM insurance (Société hospitalière d'assurance mutuelle) over the last 10 years. RESULTS: During the study period 33,962 claims were surgery-related and 11 were for deaths after AS. Two of the death claims were excluded from our study because they occurred after the first month. The surgeries concerned were tonsilectomy (3), cataract (2), inguinal hernia (2), varicose vein stripping (1) and laparoscopy (1). Death occurred on average 5.4 days after the AS, in intensive care (3), during hospitalisation (2), with emergency medical services (1), in an emergency department (1) or at home (2). Anaesthesia was directly implicated in 3 cases: anaphylactic shock (Diamox), pneumoperitoneum (gastric swelling) and hemoperitoneum (mismanagement of anticoagulants). 1 case was due to a pulmonary embolism and 5 to a surgical cause. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION: There was only one case where the complication was aggravated due to the delay of care provision and this was because of a lack of information on the complications requiring an emergency return (abdominal pain after laparoscopy). In all the other cases, death would also probably have occurred during conventional hospitalisation, either because it was unavoidable or because the patient was too far from the surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/mortalidade , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Seguro de Hospitalização , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Causas de Morte , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento
7.
Am J Psychiatry ; 172(2): 182-9, 2015 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25263817

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Insurance coverage for young adults has increased since 2010, when the Affordable Care Act (ACA) required insurers to permit children to remain on parental policies until age 26 as dependents. This study estimated the association between the dependent coverage provision and changes in young adults' use of hospital-based services for substance use disorders and non-substance use psychiatric disorders. METHOD: The authors conducted a quasi-experimental comparison of a national sample of non-childbirth-related inpatient admissions to general hospitals (a total of 2,670,463 admissions, 430,583 of which had primary psychiatric diagnoses) and California emergency department visits with psychiatric diagnoses (N=11,139,689), using data spanning 2005 to 2011. Analyses compared young adults who were targeted by the ACA dependent coverage provision (19- to 25-year-olds) and those who were not (26- to 29-year-olds), estimating changes in utilization before and after implementation of the dependent coverage provision. Primary outcome measures included quarterly inpatient admissions for primary diagnoses of any psychiatric disorder per 1,000 population; emergency department visits with any psychiatric diagnosis per 1,000 population; and payer source. RESULTS: Dependent coverage expansion was associated with 0.14 more inpatient admissions for psychiatric diagnoses per 1,000 for 19- to 25-year-olds (targeted by the ACA) than for 26- to 29-year-olds (not targeted by the ACA). The coverage expansion was associated with 0.45 fewer psychiatric emergency department visits per 1,000 in California. The probability that inpatient admissions nationally and emergency department visits in California were uninsured decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: ACA dependent coverage provisions produced modest increases in general hospital psychiatric inpatient admissions and higher rates of insurance coverage for young adults nationally. Lower rates of emergency department visits were observed in California.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adulto , California , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Saúde Mental/tendências , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
8.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 29(4): e394-405, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25244539

RESUMO

This study aimed at estimating the percentage of hospital discharges and days of care accounted for by Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) at Health Insurance Organization (HIO) hospitals in Alexandria, calculating hospitalization rates for ACSCs among HIO population and identifying determinants of hospitalization for those conditions. A sample of 8300 medical records of patients discharged from three hospitals affiliated to HIO at Alexandria was reviewed. The rate of monthly discharges for ACSCs was estimated on the basis of counting number of combined ACSCs detected in the three hospitals and the hospitals' average monthly discharges. ACSCs accounted for about one-fifth of hospitalizations and days of care at HIO hospitals (21.8% and 20.8%, respectively). Annual hospitalization rates for ACSCs were 152.5 per 10,000 insured population. The highest rates were attributed to cellulitis/abscess (47.3 per 10,000 population), followed by diabetes complications and asthma (42.8 and 20.8 per 10,00 population). Logistic regression indicated that age, number of previous admissions, and admission department are significant predictors for hospitalization for an ACSC.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Abscesso/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Celulite (Flegmão)/epidemiologia , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Egito , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
9.
Ann Acad Med Stetin ; 60(2): 110-2, 2014.
Artigo em Polonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26591118

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Co-payment in the health sector operates in most healthcare systems in European countries. The aim of this study was knowledge of Polish citizens' opinions concerning healthcare services co-payment with respect to selected socio-demographic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted using a diagnostic survey of 636 respondents, representing residents of the West Pomeranian region, Poland. RESULTS: The majority of respondents did not accept co-payment for health services. CONCLUSIONS: Material situation and educational background impact on decisions concerning co-payment for hospital treatment.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Hospitalização/economia , Adulto , Escolaridade , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Polônia
10.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 11: 29, 2013 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23961956

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: India's health expenditure is met mostly by households through out-of-pocket (OOP) payments at the time of illness. To protect poor families, the Indian government launched a national health insurance scheme (RSBY). Those below the national poverty line (BPL) are eligible to join the RSBY. The premium is heavily subsidised by the government. The enrolled members receive a card and can avail of free hospitalisation care up to a maximum of US$ 600 per family per year. The hospitals are reimbursed by the insurance companies. The objective of our study was to analyse the extent to which RSBY contributes to universal health coverage by protecting families from making OOP payments. METHODS: A two-stage stratified sampling technique was used to identify eligible BPL families in Patan district of Gujarat, India. Initially, all 517 villages were listed and 78 were selected randomly. From each of these villages, 40 BPL households were randomly selected and a structured questionnaire was administered. Interviews and discussions were also conducted among key stakeholders. RESULTS: Our sample contained 2,920 households who had enrolled in the RSBY; most were from the poorer sections of society. The average hospital admission rate for the period 2010-2011 was 40/1,000 enrolled. Women, elderly and those belonging to the lowest caste had a higher hospitalisation rate. Forty four per cent of patients who had enrolled in RSBY and had used the RSBY card still faced OOP payments at the time of hospitalisation. The median OOP payment for the above patients was US$ 80 (interquartile range, $16-$200) and was similar in both government and private hospitals. Patients incurred OOP payments mainly because they were asked to purchase medicines and diagnostics, though the same were included in the benefit package. CONCLUSIONS: While the RSBY has managed to include the poor under its umbrella, it has provided only partial financial coverage. Nearly 60% of insured and admitted patients made OOP payments. We plea for better monitoring of the scheme and speculate that it is possible to enhance effective financial coverage of the RSBY if the nodal agency at state level would strengthen its stewardship and oversight functions.


Assuntos
Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/economia , Estudos Transversais , Saúde da Família/economia , Feminino , Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Índia , Seguro de Hospitalização/economia , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Religião , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Am J Epidemiol ; 177(8): 841-51, 2013 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23479344

RESUMO

In this study, we validated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's use of a 10% threshold of median proportion of positive laboratory tests (median proportion positive (MPP)) to identify respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons against a standard based on hospitalization claims. Medicaid fee-for-service recipients under 2 years of age from California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas (1999-2004), continuously eligible since birth, were categorized for each week as high-risk or low-risk with regard to RSV-related hospitalization based on medical and pharmacy claims data and birth certificates. Weeks were categorized as on-season if the RSV hospitalization incidence rate in high-risk children exceeded the seasonal peak of the incidence rate in low-risk children. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to measure the ability of MPP to discriminate between on-season and off-season weeks as determined from hospitalization data. Areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.83, 0.92) in Illinois to 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.94, 0.98) in California. Requiring at least 5 positive tests in addition to the 10% MPP threshold optimized accuracy, as indicated by minimized root mean square errors. The 10% MPP with the added requirement of at least 5 positive tests is a valid method for identifying clinically significant RSV seasons across geographically diverse states.


Assuntos
Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/diagnóstico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/isolamento & purificação , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , California/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Incidência , Lactente , Seguro de Hospitalização/economia , Laboratórios/economia , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Palivizumab , Prevalência , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/economia , Estações do Ano , Texas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 156(32): A4887, 2012.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22871252

RESUMO

The relationship between hospital volume and outcome of care after pancreatic surgery, particularly mortality, has been described extensively in the past. Today, this relationship is frequently being used by healthcare providers and/or insurance companies to select hospitals for various surgical procedures. This concept, however, has many limitations. The conceptual model concerning the relationship between how hospital facilities are arranged and the different aspects of the process of providing healthcare is discussed in three case histories describing complicated postoperative courses after pancreatic resections. The conclusion is that, besides hospital volume, the manner in which the various facilities in hospitals are arranged as well as the process of care giving, particularly the effectiveness of multidisciplinary meetings, are of crucial importance to the quality of care. Data per illness, with adequate correction for case mix, are of crucial importance for comparing the differences in quality of care between hospitals.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pancreatectomia/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Neurology ; 78(16): 1200-6, 2012 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22442428

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine national time trends of resective surgery for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy before and after Class I evidence demonstrating its efficacy and subsequent practice guidelines recommending early surgical evaluation. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study with time trends of patients admitted to US hospitals for medically refractory focal epilepsy between 1990 and 2008 who did or did not undergo lobectomy, as reported in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. RESULTS: Weighted data revealed 112,026 hospitalizations for medically refractory focal epilepsy and 6,653 resective surgeries (lobectomies and partial lobectomies) from 1990 to 2008. A trend of increasing hospitalizations over time was not accompanied by an increase in surgeries, producing an overall trend of decreasing surgery rates (F = 13.6, p < 0.01). Factors associated with this trend included a decrease in epilepsy hospitalizations at the highest-volume epilepsy centers, and increased hospitalizations to lower-volume hospitals that were found to be less likely to perform surgery. White patients were more likely to have surgery than racial minorities (relative risk [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.17), and privately insured individuals were more likely to receive lobectomy than those with Medicaid or Medicare (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25-1.30). CONCLUSION: Despite Class I evidence and subsequent practice guidelines, the utilization of lobectomy has not increased from 1990 to 2008. Surgery continues to be heavily underutilized as a treatment for epilepsy, with significant disparities by race and insurance coverage. Patients who are medically refractory after failing 2 antiepileptic medications should be referred to a comprehensive epilepsy center for surgical evaluation.


Assuntos
Lobectomia Temporal Anterior/tendências , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Adulto , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Ann Fam Med ; 9(6): 489-95, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22084259

RESUMO

PURPOSE Some studies suggest proprietary (for-profit) hospitals are maximizing financial margins from patient care by limiting therapies or decreasing length of stay for uninsured patients. This study examines the role of insurance related to length of stay once the patient is in the hospital and risk for mortality, particularly in a for-profit environment. METHODS We undertook an analysis of hospitalizations in the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) of the 5-year period of 2003 to 2007 for patients aged 18 to 64 years (unweighted n = 849,866; weighted n = 90 million). The analysis included those who were hospitalized with both ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs), hospitalizations considered to be preventable, and non-ACSCs. We analyzed the transformed mean length of stay between individuals who had Medicaid or all other insurance types while hospitalized and those who were hospitalized without insurance. This analysis was stratified by hospital ownership. We also examined the relationship between in-hospital mortality and insurance status. RESULTS After controlling for comorbidities; age, sex, and race/ethnicity; and hospitalizations with either an ACSC or non-ACSC diagnosis, patients without insurance tended to have a significantly shorter length of stay. Across all hospital types, the mean length of stay for ACSCs was significantly shorter for individuals without insurance (2.77 days) than for those with either private insurance (2.89 days, P = .04) or Medicaid (3.19, P <.01). Among hospitalizations for ACSCs, in-hospital mortality rate for individuals with either private insurance or Medicaid was not significantly different from the mortality rate for those without insurance. CONCLUSIONS Patients without insurance have shorter lengths of stay for both ACSCs and non-ACSCs. Future research should examine whether patients without insurance are being discharged prematurely.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais com Fins Lucrativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Religiosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Periodontol ; 82(6): 809-19, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21138352

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The chances of presenting to hospital emergency departments (EDs) are significantly higher in individuals who ignore regular dental care and in those with medical conditions. Little is known about nationwide estimates of hospital-based ED visits caused by periodontal conditions in the United States. The objective of this study is to determine the incidence of ED visits caused by periodontal conditions that occurred in a 2006 nationwide sample and to identify the risk factors for hospitalization during the ED visits. METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for 2006 was used for this study. Patients who visited the ED with a primary diagnosis of acute gingivitis, chronic gingivitis, gingival recession, aggressive or acute periodontitis, chronic periodontitis, periodontosis, accretions, other specified periodontal disease, or unspecified gingival and periodontal disease were selected for this study. Estimates were projected to the national levels using the discharge weights. The association between patient characteristics and the odds of being hospitalized was examined using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 85,039 visits to hospital-based EDs with a mean charge per visit of $456.31 and total charges close to $33.3 million were primarily attributed to gingival and periodontal conditions in the United States. Close to 36% and 33% of all visits occurred among the lowest income group and uninsured population, respectively. The total ED charges for those covered by Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and other insurance plans were close to $4.95 million, $9.14 million, $8.01 million, and $0.92 million, respectively. The uninsured were charged a total of $10.06 million. Inpatient admission to the same hospital was required for 1,167 visits. The total hospitalization charge for this group was $17.51 million. Patients with comorbid conditions (congestive heart failure, valvular disease, hypertension, paralysis, neurologic disorders, chronic pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, liver disease, AIDS, coagulopathy, deficiency anemia, obesity, alcohol abuse, or drug abuse) were associated with higher odds for hospitalization during an ED visit for periodontal conditions compared to those without comorbid conditions (P <0.05). Patients who had a primary diagnosis of acute or aggressive periodontitis were associated with significantly higher odds of being hospitalized during ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates from the NEDS suggest that a total of 85,039 hospital-based ED visits had a primary diagnosis for periodontal conditions. Close to $33.3 million was charged by hospitals for treating these conditions on an emergency basis. ED visits with a primary diagnosis for acute and aggressive periodontitis, covered by Medicare insurance, and comorbid conditions were more likely to result in hospitalization based on the analysis of the NEDS. However, when interpreting these conclusions, one should keep the limitations inherent to hospital discharge datasets in perspective.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Periodontais/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Comorbidade , Coleta de Dados , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Periodontais/diagnóstico , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
J Agromedicine ; 15(1): 54-7, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20390732

RESUMO

Analysis of 295 agricultural injury hospitalizations in a single state's hospital discharge database found that workers' compensation covered only 5% of the inpatient stays. Other sources were commercial health insurance (47%), Medicare (31%), and Medicaid (7%); 9% were uninsured. Estimated mean hospital and physician payments (not costs or charges) were $12,056 per hospitalization. Nearly one sixth (16%) of hospitalizations were either unreimbursed or covered by Medicaid, indicating a substantial cost-shift to public funding sources. Problems in characterizing agricultural injuries and states' exceptions to workers' compensation coverage mandates point to the need for comprehensive health coverage.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Exposição Ocupacional/economia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Seguro de Hospitalização/economia , Medicaid/economia , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Medicare/economia , Setor Privado , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA