Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 53: 151763, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34111707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary mediastinal germ tumours (PMGCT) constitute, a mere 3-4% of all germ cell tumours (GCT). Although they account for approximately 16% of mediastinal tumours in adults and 19-25% in children as per western literature, there is hardly any large series on PMGCT reported from the Indian subcontinent. DESIGN: We have retrospectively analysed clinicopathological features of 98 cases of PMGCT diagnosed over 10 years (2010-2019) from a tertiary-care oncology centre. RESULTS: The study group (n = 98) comprised predominantly of males (n = 92) (M:F ratio-15:1), with an age range between 3 months to 57 years (median: 25 years). The tumours were predominantly located in the anterior mediastinum (n = 96). Broadly, Non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) were more common (n = 73, 74%) compared to pure seminoma (n = 25, 26%). Mixed NSGCT was the most common histological subtype (n = 30) followed by pure mature teratoma (n = 18), pure Yolk sac tumour (n = 13), mixed seminoma and NSGCT (n = 5), pure immature teratoma (n = 3) and GCT; NOS (n = 4). Interestingly, all female patients had exclusive teratomas. Nine cases revealed secondary somatic malignancy (5 carcinomas and 4 sarcomas). The majority of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 71). Surgical excision was performed in 60 patients. Follow up was available in 68 patients. NSGCT showed a poor prognosis as compared to seminoma (p value = 0.03) and tumours with somatic malignancies had a more aggressive clinical course. CONCLUSION: PMGCT was seen predominantly in young adult males and somatic malignancies were noted in as high as 9% of cases. Patient with somatic malignancy have aggressive clinical course, hence, extensive sampling and careful histopathological evaluation are recommended for the identification and definitive characterization.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Mediastino/patologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/diagnóstico , Seminoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tumor do Seio Endodérmico/diagnóstico , Tumor do Seio Endodérmico/epidemiologia , Tumor do Seio Endodérmico/patologia , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia/organização & administração , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seminoma/epidemiologia , Seminoma/patologia , Teratoma/diagnóstico , Teratoma/epidemiologia , Teratoma/patologia , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 147(8): 2249-2258, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33885951

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Advances in testicular cancer screening and therapy increased 10-year survival to 97% despite a rising incidence; eventually expanding the population of survivors requiring follow-up. We analyzed 10-year follow-up costs after testicular cancer treatment in Germany during 2000, 2008, and 2015. METHODS: Testicular cancer follow-up guidelines were extracted from the European Association of Urology. Per patient costs were estimated with a micro-costing approach considering direct and indirect medical expenses derived from expert interviews, literature research, and official scales of tariffs. Three perspectives covering costs for patients, providers, and insurers were included to estimate societal costs. Cost progression was compared across cancer histology, stage, stakeholders, resource use, and follow-up years. RESULTS: Mean 10-year follow-up costs per patient for stage I seminomatous germ-cell tumors (SGCT) on surveillance declined from EUR 11,995 in 2000 to EUR 4,430 in 2015 (p < 0.001). Advanced SGCT spending shrank from EUR 13,866 to EUR 9,724 (p < 0.001). In contrast, expenditure for stage II SGCT increased from EUR 7,159 to EUR 9,724 (p < 0.001). While insurers covered 32% of costs in 2000, only 13% of costs were reimbursed in 2015 (p < 0.001). 70% of SGCT follow-up resources were consumed by medical imaging (x-ray, CT, ultrasound, FDG-PET). Spending was unevenly distributed across follow-up years (years 1-2: 50%, years 3-5: 39%, years 5-10: 11%). CONCLUSIONS: The increasing prevalence of testicular cancer survivors caused German statutory insurers to cut per patient cost by up to 80% by budgeting services and decreasing reimbursement rates. The economic burden was gradually redistributed to patients and providers.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Monitorização Fisiológica/economia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas , Neoplasias Testiculares , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/história , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Seguimentos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/economia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/história , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/história , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/história , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Monitorização Fisiológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/economia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/terapia , Seminoma/economia , Seminoma/epidemiologia , Seminoma/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/economia , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia
3.
J Urol ; 199(2): 481-486, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28789946

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report the safety of surveillance of small testicular masses incidentally discovered during evaluation of male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database to identify patients with male infertility found to have incidental small testicular masses (hypoechoic lesions less than 10 mm) on scrotal ultrasound. The men were offered close surveillance with interval imaging and office followup. Patient and imaging characteristics were collected to compare the surveillance and surgical groups with additional comparisons between benign and malignant pathologies to elucidate predictors of underlying malignancy. RESULTS: Of 4,088 men in whom scrotal ultrasound was completed for male infertility evaluation 120 (2.9%) were found to have a subcentimeter testicular mass. Average followup was 1.30 years (range 0.1 to 16.9). A total of 18 men (15%) proceeded to extirpative surgery while 102 remained on surveillance at last followup. In those with at least 1 month of followup the mean lesion growth rate was -0.01 mm per year. Reasons for surgery included testicular exploration for infertility, mass growth, positive tumor markers, history of testis cancer, concerning imaging characteristics and patient choice. Six of the 18 men who underwent surgery were found to have malignancy, which was seminoma in all. All malignant lesions were greater than 5 mm on initial imaging and demonstrated vascularity, although size and vascularity were not significantly different from those of benign lesions on final pathology findings. No patients demonstrated advanced or recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Small testicular masses are not uncommon, especially in the infertile male population. Most of these masses do not show significant growth during long-term evaluation and can be safely surveilled with close followup.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico por imagem , Seminoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Seguimentos , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Infertilidade Masculina/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seminoma/complicações , Seminoma/epidemiologia , Seminoma/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/complicações , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Ultrassonografia , Conduta Expectante
4.
Urol Oncol ; 32(1): 23.e15-21, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23395701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most common malignancies among US men between the ages of 20 and 34. Five-year survival has increased since 1970s (95%), but remains below 75% for patients with late-stage disease. Few studies have examined the sociodemographic predictors of late-stage diagnosis, and none have examined the relationship between stage at diagnosis and health insurance among TGCTs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 48,151 men between the age of 15 and 64 years who were diagnosed with first primary invasive TGCTs from 1998 to 2008 were selected from the National Cancer Data Base. The effect of health insurance, race/ethnicity, ZIP code-based socioeconomic status, and other factors on late-stage diagnosis was examined using histology-stratified multivariate log binomial models to measure relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Overall, 6.6% and 21.2% of seminomas and nonseminomas were diagnosed at late stage, respectively. Uninsured men (seminomas: RR, 1.88, 95% CI, 1.65-2.13; nonseminomas: RR,1.42, 95% CI, 1.32-1.54), Medicaid-insured men (seminomas: RR, 2.99, 95% CI, 2.64-3.38; nonseminomas: RR 2.82, 95% CI, 2.48-3.22), and Medicare-insured men (seminomas: RR, 2.30, 95% CI, 1.91-2.77; nonseminomas: RR 2.02 95% CI, 1.67-2.44) were more likely to be diagnosed at late stage compared with privately insured men. Black men (nonseminomas: RR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.25-1.64) and Hispanic men (seminomas: RR, 1.34, 95% CI, 1.16-1.55; nonseminomas: RR, 1.22, 95% CI, 1.12-1.33) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at late stage. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with an increased risk of late-stage diagnosis among both seminomas and nonseminomas. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic covariates, particularly health insurance, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, were predictors of late-stage diagnosis. TGCTs are typically diagnosed among younger men who are less likely to have health insurance. Future efforts should aim to increase health insurance coverage and access to primary care, reduce barriers to care, and promote informed decision making for underserved populations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/epidemiologia , Seminoma/diagnóstico , Seminoma/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Bases de Dados Factuais , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Seminoma/mortalidade , Classe Social , Neoplasias Testiculares/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Urologe A ; 50(3): 322-7, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21161157

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy and sensitivity of FDG (2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) positron emission tomography (PET) to predict viable residual tumours in patients with metastatic seminoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Altogether 5 studies with 130 patients were identified. Both FDG PET and the size of the residual lesions on conventional computed tomography (CT; lesions either ≤ or > 3 cm) were correlated with the presence or absence of viable residual tumour. RESULTS: The specificity (92 vs 59%), sensitivity (72 vs 63%), positive (70 vs 28%) and negative (93 vs 86%) predictive value of FDG PET were superior to data obtained by assessing residual tumour size (either ≤ or > 3 cm) applying CT scans alone. CONCLUSION: In view of the data currently available, FDG PET seems to be a clinically useful predictor of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy residuals of pure seminoma.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/estatística & dados numéricos , Seminoma/tratamento farmacológico , Seminoma/secundário , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Seminoma/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA