Prevalence and risk indicators of dentin hypersensitivity in adult and elderly populations from Porto Alegre, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a clinical condition with potential implications for patients. However, little is known about its occurrence and determinants in the general population. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence and risk indicators of DH in Porto Alegre, Brazil. METHODS: A representative multistage probability sample of 1,023 adults aged ≥ 35 years was obtained. Individuals were interviewed and clinically examined in their homes. DH was assessed dichotomously in all present teeth by a blast of air and a manual probe. Teeth restored with crowns and presenting with carious cavitation were excluded. Survey logistic regression using sampling weights was applied to assess demographics and behavioral and clinical determinants. RESULTS: Overall prevalence estimates for DH diagnosed by air and probe were 33.4% and 34.2%. DH affected ≈ 1 tooth per individual, and approximately 10% of teeth with gingival recession (GR) had DH. In a multivariable model for DH diagnosed with air, females had increased chance of DH (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57 to 2.91). Smoking, periodontal treatment, and GR were also associated with increased DH risk. The chance of DH was lower (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.76) among individuals ≥ 60 than among those aged 35 to 49 years. Oral hygiene practices, socioeconomic and education status, dental visits, and gingival inflammation were not associated with DH. CONCLUSIONS: DH may be considered a concern in a Brazilian general population. Reduction of DH may be achieved by smoking cessation and periodontal health improvements.

The oral health of ageing baby boomers: a comparison of adults aged 45-64 and those 65 years and older.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the oral health status of adults aged 45-64 (baby boomers) and those aged 65 and older. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional survey of adults living independently in rural and urban settings in Nova Scotia, Canada was conducted. Using random digit dialing, calibrated interviewers completed a telephone survey, and clinicians calibrated to WHO standards conducted clinical examinations. Weighting was used to correct for sampling bias. RESULTS: 747 community dwelling adults completed both the clinical exam and the questionnaire (n=411, age 45-64; n=336, age 65 or older). Rates of edentulism were low (2.6% aged 45-64; 15.7% aged 65+; p<0.001). Untreated root caries was greater in the older dentate group (19.7 vs. 10.1%; p<0.001). Being 65 years of age or older was identified as a predictor of increased decayed, missing, filled teeth, presence of decayed and/or filled roots and presence of attachment loss≥4 mm, but was not a significant predictor of presence of untreated coronal caries. CONCLUSIONS: A falling rate of edentulism and a higher risk for root caries with increasing age may predict the need for more complex dental care as our population ages.

Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in symptoms of orofacial pain.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to document the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and the prevalence and impact of orofacial pain by anatomical location. In addition, differential effects of SES on orofacial pain across levels of sex, race, and age were documented. METHODS: The subjects were 724 participants in the Florida Dental Care Study, a study of oral health among dentate adults, aged 45 years and older at baseline. Pain prevalence and subjective ratings were assessed for a range of orofacial pain sites using a standardized telephone interview. RESULTS: Lower SES was associated with reporting pain and pain impact at many, but not all, of the orofacial sites. Some sex, race, and age cohort differences in orofacial pain were found when adjusting for differences in socioeconomic position. The most consistent result, as evidenced by similar findings across orofacial pain sites, was that the effects of SES on orofacial pain appear to have a sex-differentiated effect. CONCLUSION: Consistent with findings for other subjective measures of oral health, persons of lower SES are at increased risk for orofacial pain and pain-related behavioral impact.

Explanatory models for clinically determined and symptom-reported caries indicators in an adult population.

The aim of the present study was to analyze possible indicators of: (i) relative number of decayed and filled teeth, (ii) relative number of decayed teeth, (iii) subjectively reported toothache, and (iv) sensitive teeth, and to find explanatory models for these phenomena. Independent variables from three domains were used: (i) socio-economic factors, (ii) general health and health-related lifestyle, and (iii) dental attitudes and behaviors. The study basis was validated questionnaires from all 50-year-olds in 2 Swedish counties (n = 8888), response rate 71% (n = 6343). For a 20% subsample (58% participation) the DFT and DT were determined by calibrated dentists. Analyses were done with logistic and multiple regression. The variables born outside Sweden, gender, education, shift work, satisfaction with dental care, fear and care utilization were associated with DFT/number of teeth. For DT/number of teeth, the direction of association was reversed for the variables born outside Sweden and gender. Social class, education, general health, and use of tobacco were further covariates. Good oral hygiene gave a lower ratio of DT. For the logistic regression model of toothache, residence in cities and satisfaction with dental care had lower probability for toothache reports, while born outside Sweden, mouth dryness, use of pharmaceuticals, tobacco, fear, and high utilization increased this probability. In general, the association pattern was as could be expected: immigrants, working class, low education, smoking, dissatisfaction with dental treatment and low utilization all appeared as risk factors for both the clinically determined caries indicators, but not necessarily for subjective symptom reports. Only fear of dental treatment showed a consistent positive association with all the indicators.

Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, aetiology and clinical management.

Dentine hypersensitivity can be a frustrating condition to treat. The most common form of treatment is use of a desensitizing dentifrice, but for many patients this may provide only partial pain relief and recurrence is common. Recent research has provided several important findings which may serve as a basis for refining the approach to dentine hypersensitivity management, and for improving the success of treatment. This paper reviews the research and outlines a management system which transfers readily to clinical practice.