Assessment of the necessity of frontal sinostomy in cases of frontal sinusitis associated with fungus ball of the maxillary sinus.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate outcomes in patients presenting with fungus ball of the maxillary sinus (MSFB) and frontal sinusitis who were treated via middle meatal antrostomy alone. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled study with a parallel group design. Patients with MSFB and frontal sinusitis were randomly assigned to the maxillary middle meatal antrostomy (MMMA) or control (MMMA + frontal sinusotomy) groups. Patient demographics, complaints, imaging findings were analyzed, and surgical outcomes were evaluated using the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (LKES) and the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were separated into two groups, with similar symptoms including nasal obstruction, mucopurulent rhinorrhea, maxillary or frontal pain, blood stained nasal discharge, nasal cacosmia and orbital pain being observed in both groups. Total LKES and SNOT-22 scores were significantly improved in both groups at 6 months post-treatment, with no significant differences in these scores between groups within a mean 6.8-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that frontal sinusotomy is not required to resolve frontal sinusitis associated with MSFB. As such frontal sinusitis appears to be a reactive process caused by fungal ball obstruction, it regresses spontaneously following fungus ball removal, drainage of the maxillary sinus, and middle meatal antrostomy.

Assessment of International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification among senior residents through inter- and intra-rater reliability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) reliability among Saudi board otorhinolaryngology senior residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between April 2019 and December 2019, included 32 senior residents. Questionnaires with 4 computed tomography images showing the different frontal cell types were used in this survey. All scans included 3 planes (axial, sagittal, coronal) and the tested cell was marked with arrows. Residents chose the answer from multiple choices according to the IFAC system. All residents filled the same questionnaire twice with 2 weeks interval. RESULTS: Approximately 68.8% of residents agreed that the classification was applicable clinically. The resident's attitude toward the importance of understanding IFAC was 65.6%. Residents' correct classification of the marked cells increased significantly for most of the questions from baseline to 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: The frontal sinus is not easy to treat surgically, and its inadequate treatment causes the failure of drainage, as in the case of chronic rhinosinusitis. Therefore, surgeons must fully understand the IFAC system to avoid major and minor complications.

Simple assessment of olfaction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

CONCLUSION: The brief-smell identification test (B-SIT) can substitute for the butanol threshold test (BTT) in screening of anosmia and postoperative assessment of olfactory outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). A time-effective test battery composed of B-SIT and the visual analog scale (VAS) can be implemented for simple olfactory assessment in any otolaryngology clinic. OBJECTIVES: Anosmia is a distinct clinical entity requiring special attention. Unpredictable olfactory outcomes after surgery make preoperative assessment more important. We compared the results of the BTT, B-SIT, and VAS to investigate whether B-SIT or VAS can substitute for BTT in screening of anosmia and postoperative follow-up. METHODS: We collected data on 68 CRS patients who had bilateral CRS and underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. Olfactory performance was graded using the BTT: normosmia, hyposmia, or anosmia. VAS and B-SIT were also performed. All tests were repeated 6 months after surgery. Postoperative improvement was defined by an increase of the BTT score ≥ 2. RESULTS: The B-SIT and VAS scores of the anomics were significantly lower than those of the normosmics. B-SIT discriminated anosmia with high specificity. Within the improvement group, postoperative increase of B-SIT/VAS score showed significance. However, neither the B-SIT nor the VAS differentiated between no change and deterioration of olfaction.

Geographic and temporal trends in frontal sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate geographic and temporal trends in frontal sinus surgery procedures. METHODS: Medicare Part B data files from 2000 to 2011 were examined for temporal trends in various frontal sinus procedures, and the most recent year containing geographic information (2010) was evaluated for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code use. Additionally, nationwide charges per procedure were recorded. Regional populations of individuals ≥ 65 years old were obtained from the 2010 U.S. Census, and surgical society websites were used to determine the number of practicing rhinologists and otolaryngologists in each region. RESULTS: The use of open approaches declined by one third, while endoscopic procedures went from 6463 to 19262 annually, with the most marked increases occurring from 2006 through 2011. Geographic variation was noted, with practitioners in the South Atlantic states performing the greatest number of endoscopic procedures in 2010, whereas the East South Central states had the greatest number when controlling for population. There was an inverse relationship between endoscopic procedures performed and number of fellowship-trained rhinologists (controlling for regional populations) (R(2) = 0.66). The first year frontal sinus ballooning had a unique CPT code illustrated decreased reimbursements for non-balloon endoscopic surgery ($609) relative to balloon approaches ($2635). CONCLUSION: Declines in open frontal sinus surgery and marked increases in endoscopic approaches have potential implications for residency training. Potential reasons for marked increases in endoscopic approaches include the rising popularity of balloon technologies, although this is speculative. Geographic variation exists in frontal sinus surgery patterns, including an inverse relationship between endoscopic approaches and the number of fellowship-trained rhinologists.

Sinus balloon dilators: one surgeon's experience and proposed indications for their use.

From October 2006 through September 2007, balloon sinusotomies were attempted on 89 sinuses in 45 patients with chronic sinus disease. Ninety-eight percent of sinuses were successfully dilated, 3.4% required revision surgery, and one complication (unlikely related to use of the balloon) occurred. Forty-four percent had previous conventional endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), 87% were hybrid cases (combination of balloon and conventional ESS instruments used), 33% had nasal polyposis, and 1.98 sinuses per patient were dilated. Preoperative Lund-Mackay radiographic sinus-staging scores averaged 12.62. Sinus balloon dilators (SBDs) were used on the frontal sinuses 81% of the time, sphenoids 13%, and maxillary sinuses 6%. SBDs were found to be efficacious and safe. The devices were useful in identifying and dilating the frontal recess, especially in cases with altered anatomy or limited visibility. When compared to conventional ESS instrumentation, however, SBDs were found to offer little advantage in opening the maxillary or sphenoid sinuses. In frontal sinus hybrid cases, using the author's proposed surgical algorithm reduces operative time, costs and, in some cases, the need for balloon dilatation. SBDs have limited indications in a select group of patients.

Assessment of symptomatic patients after endoscopic sinus surgery with special reference to the frontal sinus: comparative radiologic analysis.

PURPOSE: To reveal the role of potential risk factors in frontal recess dissection (FRD), middle turbinate resection (MTR), sinonasal polyposis, and extension of disease in postoperative frontal sinus opacification by determining radiologic changes after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in symptomatic cases using computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from symptomatic patients after ESS. METHODS: Postoperative CT scans were taken in all symptomatic patients during their least symptomatic period or after maximal medical therapy. The radiologic findings of each sinus were compared, and the outcome of ESS was statistically evaluated. Furthermore, FRD, MTR, sinonasal polyposis, and extension of disease were analyzed for postoperative frontal sinus opacification. RESULTS: In our study, 101 sinuses of 61 symptomatic patients were examined. A significant improvement in opacification in all sinuses was detected postoperatively. Multivariate analysis of all potential risk factors revealed that postoperative frontal sinus opacification was affected only by sinonasal polyposis (odds ratio [OR] 3.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-10.58) and extension of disease (OR 16.93; 95% CI 4.33-66.23). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that surgical procedures such as FRD and/or MTR may not directly affect postoperative frontal sinus opacification. On the contrary, sinonasal polyposis and extension of disease seemed to be the main risk factors of this issue.

[Assessment of changes in the course of nasal and paranasal inflammation]. / Otsenka dinamiki vospalitel'nogo protsessa v polosti nosa i okolonosovykh pazukhakh.

Direct joulemetry, a method of diagnosis of nasal and paranasal mucosa condition, is based on measurement of electric current work (CW) by electrochemical dissociation of biological fluids on the mucosa of the frontal sinus and its aperture. 27 patients had CW characteristics in three forms of inflammation: purulent, serous-fibrinous, exudative. The effectiveness of the method in follow-up of patients with frontal sinusitis is shown.

Analysis of a critical pathway in osteoplastic flap for frontal sinus obliteration.

OBJECTIVES: A critical pathway was applied to patients undergoing osteoplastic flap (OPF) for frontal sinus obliteration to determine whether efficiency could be improved. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of consecutive OPF procedures (n = 51) performed between 1992 and July 1997 was conducted. METHODS: The patient groups were subdivided into those who underwent OPF alone and those who had endoscopic sinus procedures performed in addition to OPF. Comparisons were made between the precritical pathway and post-critical pathway groups, specifically noting operative time, total operating room (OR) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, and costs. We used a critical pathway that was developed for endoscopic sinus procedures at our institution through a multidisciplinary team approach. Preoperative evaluation and testing, intraoperative equipment and medications, and postoperative care including follow-up clinic visits were all standardized. An unpaired, two-tailed Student t test was used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Statistically significant (P<.05) reductions in operative times, total OR time, EBL, and length of hospital stay were observed in the post-critical pathway group who underwent endoscopic sinus procedures as well as OPF. Costs to the OR were reduced 29% and 15% for OPF and for OPF with endoscopic surgery, respectively. Patient costs were reduced 5% and 4% in these groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With implementation of effective critical pathways, significant decreases in length of stay are seen, and cost reductions can be realized through the improved efficiency, shortened OR times, and decreases in redundancy of ordering materials.