Epidemiology of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A descriptive study using the national database of health insurance claims and specific health checkups of Japan.

BACKGROUND: Using patient registries or limited regional hospitalization data may result in underestimation of the incidence and prevalence of rare diseases. Therefore, we used the national administrative database to estimate the incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis over six years (2014-2019) and describe changes in clinical practice and mortality. METHODS: We extracted data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan between January 2013 and December 2020. This database covers ≥99% of the population. We used the diagnostic code for lymphangioleiomyomatosis to estimate the incidence and prevalence from 2014 to 2019. Additionally, we examined the demographic characteristics, treatments, comorbidities, and mortality of the patients. RESULTS: In women, the incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis in 2019 were approximately 3 per 1,000,000 person-years and 28.7 per 1,000,000 persons, respectively. While, in men, the incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis were <0.2 per 1,000,000 person-years and 0.8 per 1,000,000 persons, respectively. From 2014 to 2019, the proportion of prescriptions of sirolimus and everolimus increased, while the use of home oxygen therapy, chest drainage, comorbid pneumothorax, and bloody phlegm decreased. The mortality rate remained stable at approximately 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis were higher in women than those reported previously. Although the incidence did not change during the 6-year period, the prevalence gradually increased. Moreover, lymphangioleiomyomatosis was observed to be rare in men. The practice of treating patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis changed across the six years while mortality remained low, at approximately 1%.

Cost and effectiveness comparison of sirolimus versus standard treatment in Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon: a real-world evidence study in Thailand.

The conventional treatment of Kasabach-Merritt Phenomenon (KMP) consists of corticosteroids with vincristine/vinblastine or others. The aim of the study is to compare the first-year direct costs and effectiveness between sirolimus and conventional treatment. A retrospective case-control study of KMP patients was conducted at a mean age of 9 months (1 day to 12 years) between 2000 and 2022 from four tertiary centers in Thailand. The direct costs, hematologic and clinical complete response (HCR, CCR), hospitalization, length of stay, and complications were compared. Of 29 patients, 13 underwent sirolimus (four upfront and nine were refractory to the conventional). The first-year total cost had no statistically significant difference between sirolimus VS conventional treatment (8,852.63 VS 9,083.56 USD: p value: 0.94). The therapeutics achievement was the same in both HCR (244.75 VS 168.94 days; p value: 0.60) and CCR (419.77 VS 399.87 days; p value: 0.90). The subgroup analysis of the first-line sirolimus (n = 4) compared with the conventional (n = 25) showed a more reduced total cost (4,907.84 VS 9,664.05 USD; p value: 0.26) rendered net total cost of -4,756.21 USD per patient (cost saving). A more significant contrast of therapeutic achievement by reduction of both HCR (11.67 VS 224.20 days; p value: 0.36) and CCR (38.50 VS 470.88 days; p value: 0.04) was shown. The sirolimus had no difference in hospitalization, length of stay, and complications. Even though, it was unable to identify significant differences in cost-effectiveness. Sirolimus is suitable for all patients who have diagnosis of KMP either for rescue therapy or first-line treatment.

In vitro assessment of the combined effect of letermovir and sirolimus on cytomegalovirus replication.

OBJECTIVE: Letermovir (LMV) is used for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and end-organ disease in adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (allo-HSCT). In turn, sirolimus (SLM) which displays in vitro anti-CMV activity, is frequently employed for prophylaxis of Graft vs. Host disease in allo-HSCT. Here, we aimed at assessing whether LMV and SLM used in combination may act synergistically in vitro on inhibiting CMV replication. METHODS: The antiviral activity of LMV and SLM alone or in combination was evaluated by a checkerboard assay, using ARPE-19 cells infected with CMV strain BADrUL131-Y. LMV and SLM were used at concentrations ranging from 24 nM to 0.38 nM and 16 nM to 0.06 nM, respectively. RESULTS: The mean EC50 for LMV and SLM was 2.44 nM (95% CI, 1.66-3.60) and 1.40 nM (95% CI, 0.41-4.74), respective. LMV and SLM interaction yielded mainly additive effects over the range of concentrations tested. CONCLUSIONS: The additive nature of the combination of LMV and SLM against CMV may have relevant clinical implications in management of CMV infection in allo-HSCT recipients undergoing prophylaxis with LMV.

Use of mTOR inhibitors (rapalogs) for the treatment of skin changes in tuberous sclerosis complex.

BACKGROUND: Skin manifestations of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) are present in more than 90% of patients. Facial angiofibromas (AF) are considered a skin hallmark of TSC. They are responsible for esthetic impact in patients. We aimed at reviewing the data available on the use of rapamycin (sirolimus) and everolimus for the oral or topical treatment of AF and other TSC-related skin changes and reporting our preliminary experience at Angers University Hospital. METHODS: The literature search has been performed in combining the terms "rapamycin", "sirolimus", "everolimus", "tuberous sclerosis complex", "skin" and "trial". We have splited the findings of the literature search into two parts: 1) the value of rapalogs used systemically for extracutaneous purposes and 2) the role of topical rapalogs used specifically for skin lesions. RESULTS: Large clinical trials using rapamycin or everolimus for the treatment of brain, lung or kidney manifestations of TSC unfortunately poorly define the "skin lesion response rate" they report. Conversely, the trials with topical rapamycin demonstrate significant, albeit transient, efficacy on AF size and visibility and acceptable tolerance. Several trials suggest better efficacy in younger patients than in adults. Long-term evaluation (up to 136 weeks) point to sustained response and good local and systemic tolerance. However, maintenance therapy appears to be mandatory to preserve skin response. Other skin changes, especially shagreen fibrotic plaques, hypomelanotic macules and ungual tumors still need far more research. Our experience in 124 patients (children and adults) treated for facial AF at Angers University Hospital showed that about 80% of them had an impressive and sustained response. CONCLUSION: The issues of cost and access to affordable topical rapamycin formulations are critical for the patients even if skin changes do not cause serious harm in the context of TSC. We strongly suggest to improve and standardize the formulation of topical rapamycin, to encourage the pharmaceutical industry for providing commercial products, and the Health systems (social welfare) to reimburse them. © 2022 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Utilization of Mycophenolic Acid, Azathioprine, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporin, Sirolimus, and Everolimus: Multinational Study.

Background: Organ transplantations are difficult, complicated and very expensive interventions. In order to preserve the transplanted organs, it is necessary to provide medical care to the patients in terms of immunosuppression. According to the guidelines, the first-line therapy choices for achieving immunosuppression after transplantation are tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid, azathioprine, sirolimus, everolimus" and corticosteroids. The aim of our study was to examine the utilization of this drugs in Montenegro and to compare the results with the ones from Finland, Croatia, and Serbia. Methods: In our investigation we used Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) methodology. Prices per DDD of drugs are presented in euros (€). Results: In all observed countries, there is a positive trend in the consumption of all 6 drugs during the analyzed period. The prices per DDD of these drugs generally show a negative trend. Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in Montenegro recorded the largest reduction in the price per DDD. Price per one DDD of tacrolimus decreased from €13.28 in 2009 to €5.11 in 2019, thus by about 260%, and as regards mycophenolic acid, the price per one DDD decreased from €9.59 in 2009 to € 3.36 in 2019, thus by almost 300%. Conclusion: Despite the reduction in the price per DDD, drugs that are used as immunosuppressants are showing increasing costs from year to year. Since these drugs are expensive, they participate in a significant percentage in the budget for medicines in each country.

MRI for Response Assessment of Extensive Lymphatic Malformations in Children Treated With Sirolimus.

BACKGROUND. Extensive lymphatic malformations (LMs) may cause substantial morbidity. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor sirolimus shows promise for treating vascular anomalies, although response assessment is not standardized. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively characterize changes seen on MRI of children with extensive LMs treated with sirolimus. METHODS. Twenty-five children treated with sirolimus for extensive LMs were included. Baseline MRI was defined as the MRI examination performed closest to therapy initiation; follow-up MRI was defined as the most recent MRI examination performed while the patient was receiving therapy. Two pediatric radiologists independently determined MRI lesion volume by tracing lesion contours on all slices (normalized to patient body surface area expressed in square meters) and determined signal by placing an ROI on the dominant portion of the lesions (normalized to CSF signal) on baseline and follow-up T2-weighted MRI sequences. Interreader agreement was determined, and values were averaged for further analysis. Volume and signal changes were compared with patient, lesion, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS. The mean (± SD) interval between initiation of sirolimus treatment and follow-up MRI was 22.1 ± 13.8 months. The mean lesion volume index on baseline and follow-up MRI was 728 ± 970 and 345 ± 501 mL/m2, respectively (p < .001). Ninety-two percent of children showed a decrease in lesion volume index that was greater than 10% (mean volume change, -46.4% ± 28.2%). Volume change was inversely correlated with age (r = -0.466; p = .02). The mean volume change was -64.7% ± 25.4% in children younger than 2 years old versus -32.0% ± 21.6% in children 2 years old or older (p = .008). The mean volume change was -58.1% ± 24.0% for craniocervical lesions versus -35.5% ± 28.2% for lesions involving the trunk and/or extremities (p = .03). Mean lesion signal ratio on baseline and follow-up MRI was 0.81 ± 0.29 and 0.59 ± 0.26, respectively (p < .001). Mean signal ratio change was -23.8% ± 22.7%. Volume and signal changes were moderately correlated (r = 0.469; p = .02). Volume and signal changes were not associated with sex, lesion subtype, serum concentration of sirolimus, or the interval between sirolimus initiation and follow-up MRI (p > .05). Interreader agreement for volume index change was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.983), and that for signal ratio change was moderate to good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.764). CONCLUSION. Sirolimus treatment of extensive LMs in children is associated with significant reductions in volume and signal on T2-weighted MRI. The decrease in volume is greater in younger children and craniocervical lesions. CLINICAL IMPACT. The results may facilitate development of standardized MRI-based criteria for assessing the response of vascular malformations to pharmacotherapy.

Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of autologous myeloid-derived suppressor cell infusion in non-human primate kidney transplantation.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are a heterogenous population of immunosuppressive myeloid cells now considered important immune regulatory cells in diverse clinical conditions, including cancer, chronic inflammatory disorders and transplantation. In rodents, MDSC administration can inhibit graft-versus-host disease lethality and enhance organ or pancreatic islet allograft survival. There is also evidence, however, that under systemic inflammatory conditions, adoptively-transferred MDSC can rapidly lose their suppressive function. To our knowledge, there are no reports of autologous MDSC administration to either human or clinically-relevant non-human primate (NHP) transplant recipients. Monocytic (m) MDSC have been shown to be more potent suppressors of T cell responses than other subsets of MDSC. Following their characterization in rhesus macaques, we have conducted a preliminary analysis of the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of purified mMDSC infusion into MHC-mismatched rhesus kidney allograft recipients. The graft recipients were treated with rapamycin and the high affinity variant of the T cell co-stimulation blocking agent cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 Ig (Belatacept) that targets the B7-CD28 pathway. Graft survival and histology were not affected by infusions of autologous, leukapheresis product-derived mMDSC on days 7 and 14 post-transplant (cumulative totals of 3.19 and 1.98 × 106 cells/kg in n = 2 recipients) compared with control monkeys that did not receive MDSC (n = 2). Sequential analyses of effector T cell populations revealed no differences between the groups. While these initial findings do not provide evidence of efficacy under the conditions adopted, further studies in NHP, designed to ascertain the appropriate mMDSC source and dose, timing and anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive agent support are likely to prove instructive regarding the therapeutic potential of MDSC in organ transplantation.

Update on the clinical assessment and management of thyroid eye disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To offer an update on advances and controversies in the assessment, investigation and treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED), a disfiguring orbital autoimmune disease, which can manifest with diplopia and threaten not only sight - but also life. RECENT FINDINGS: Developments in biomarkers and imaging are helping to tailor the management of patients. Emerging therapies target different pathways in the disease and are informed by studies into TED pathogenesis: the last 2 years has, for example, seen the culmination of a two-decade long bench-to-bedside story in which an original focus on the IGF1 receptor has translated into an effective treatment for proptosis in thyroid eye disease. Whether this will result in a real-world reduction in TED-related morbidity will depend on access; commercial pricing decisions may preclude widespread adoption of novel therapies. SUMMARY: Thyroid eye disease research is enjoying a renaissance with advances in both monitoring and treatment coupled with a renewed emphasis on a holisitic approach, which includes aesthetic care for patients; this is perhaps the most exciting time to be part of the international thyroid eye disease community in decades - for physicians, surgeons and patients. The commercial window for break-through drugs are narrowing with an array of new therapeutic agents in the pipeline over the coming decade.

COPD assessment test as a possible tool for evaluating health-related quality of life in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a progressive, cystic lung disease that causes an obstructive ventilatory impairment similar to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and impairs the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Here, we extended the use of the COPD assessment test (CAT) to patients with chronic respiratory diseases other than COPD. Specifically, the CAT was administered to patients with LAM for the first time. METHODS: Using data from 25 patients with LAM at Juntendo University who participated in the Multicenter Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Sirolimus Trial for Safety (MLSTS), we evaluated changes in pulmonary function, responses to HRQoL questionnaires (the CAT, St. George׳s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ], EuroQOL Visual Analogue Scale [EuroQOL-VAS], and Functional Performance Inventory [FPI]), and the association between pulmonary function and HRQoL during a 24-month period of sirolimus treatment. RESULTS: Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and CAT total scores improved over the 24 months of sirolimus treatment (5.33 ± 1.20 ml/month, 2.61 ± 1.16 ml/month, and -0.127 ± 0.022 score/month, respectively), whereas SGRQ total score, EuroQOL-VAS score, and FPI score did not. Most pulmonary functions at baseline were associated with the CAT breathlessness score during the first year. Longitudinal changes in FEV1, FEV1%predicted, or FEV1/FVC correlated significantly with the scores of CAT total, CAT breathlessness, and SGRQ activity. When analyzed by stepwise multivariate regression within a linear mixed-effects model, CAT breathlessness and confidence scores were significantly associated with a change in FEV1 from the baseline value (P = 0.0011, and P = 0.0441). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the CAT is a useful instrument for assessing HRQoL in sirolimus-treated patients with LAM.

Eficacia y seguridad de sirolimus para el tratamiento de pacientes con diagnóstico de linfangioleiomiomatosis / Efficacy and safety of sirolimus for the treatment of patients diagnosed with lymphangioleiomyomatosis

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de sirolimus en pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de linfangioleiomiomatosis. La linfangioleiomiomatosis (LAM) es una enfermedad rara, progresiva y sistémica que afecta principalmente a mujeres en edad fértil. En los pacientes con LAM, las células del músculo liso invaden los pulmones y crecen sin control. A lo largo de los años, este tejido anormal se acumula y bloquea el flujo de aire, lo que conlleva a la pérdida progresiva de la función pulmonar. En EsSalud, el manejo de los pacientes con LAM se realiza mediante la mejor terapia de soporte, que incluye el manejo de la obstrucción del flujo de aire y la hipoxemia, el tratamiento específico para complicaciones quirúrgicas o pleurales, y el tratamiento intervencionista de lesiones renales. Sin embargo, los médicos especialistas han sugerido el uso del sirolimus, considerando que éste podría ofrecer un beneficio adicional respecto a la mejor terapia de soporte. Precisamente, con el objetivo de evaluar la utilidad de sirolimus en el manejo de pacientes con LAM, se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de literatura sobre la eficacia y seguridad de sirolimus en pacientes adultos con LAM. TECNOLOGÍA SANITARIA DE INTERÉS: Sirolimus inhibe la activación y proliferación de los linfocitos T mediada por citoquinas e inhibe la producción de anticuerpos. En las células, sirolimus se une a la inmunofilina, FK Binding Protein-12 (FKBP-12), para generar un complejo inmunosupresor que se une e inhibe la activación de la quinasa reguladora mTOR. Esta inhibición suprime la proliferación de linfocitos T, inhibiendo la progresión desde la fase G1 a la fase S del ciclo celular. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de literatura con el objetivo de identificar evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad de sirolimus en pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de linfangioleiomiomatosis. Se utilizaron las bases de datos The Cochrane Library, Medline y el metabuscador TRIP Database, priorizándose la evidencia proveniente de revisiones sistemáticas o meta-análisis de ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, incluyendo Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) y páginas web de organizaciones internacionales de neumología. Se hizo una búsqueda adicional en la página web de clinicaltrials.gov, para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o que no hayan sido publicados. La búsqueda sistemática se basó en una metodología escalonada, la cual consistió en la búsqueda inicial de estudios secundarios (tipo revisiones sistemáticas de ensayos clínicos) que respondan a la pregunta PICO, seguido de la búsqueda de estudios primarios (tipo ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados). RESULTADOS: La GPC de la ATS/JRS realizó una recomendación fuerte a favor del uso de sirolimus en pacientes con LAM y función pulmonar anormal o en deterioro. Esta recomendación estuvo basada en los resultados del estudio MILES, el cual fue incluido y analizado en el presente dictamen. Basado en esta evidencia, la ATS/JRS concluyó que sirolimus ofrece un beneficio clínico sobre la función pulmonar, del desempeño funcional y la calidad de vida, además de ser tolerable en pacientes con LAM. El estudio MILES (Multicenter International LAM Efficacy of Sirolimus) fue un ensayo doble ciego, aleatorizado, de grupos paralelos en el que 89 pacientes con LAM y deterioro pulmonar moderado (definido como volumen espiratorio forzado en 1 segundo [VEF 1 ] ≤ 70 % del predicho) fueron asignados aleatoriamente para recibir tratamiento con sirolimus o placebo durante 12 meses, seguido de 12 meses de observación. Los resultados mostraron una estabilización de la función pulmonar con sirolimus y un deterioro de la función pulmonar con el placebo (razón de cambio en VEF 1 : 1±2 frente a -12±2 ml/mes, respectivamente; p=0.001). Del mismo modo, se observaron diferencias significativas en las medidas de capacidad vital forzada (CVF), calidad de vida medida por la escala EuroQOL y el desempeño funcional, aunque estas últimas dos comparaciones mostraron significancias marginales, con valores de p cercanos a 0.05. Además, si bien los eventos adversos totales fueron mayores con sirolimus que con placebo, la tasa de eventos adversos serios no difirió entre ambos grupos. Adicionalmente, se reportaron 2 muertes y 2 casos de neumotórax en el brazo del placebo. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia científica disponible hasta agosto del 2018, que evalúa la eficacia y seguridad de sirolimus en pacientes adultos con LAM, proviene del estudio MILES, un ECA de fase III, doble ciego, multicéntrico y controlado por placebo cuyo objetivo principal fue evaluar los efectos de sirolimus sobre la función pulmonar (medido por el VEF 1 ) en pacientes mujeres con LAM y deterioro pulmonar. Sus resultados mostraron una estabilización en la función pulmonar con sirolimus y un deterioro continuo con el placebo. Del mismo modo, se observaron diferencias significativas en las medidas de CVF, calidad de vida medida por la escala EuroQOL y el desempeño funcional, aunque estas últimas dos comparaciones mostraron significancias marginales, con valores de p cercanos a 0.05. Además, si bien los eventos adversos totales fueron mayores con sirolimus que con placebo, la tasa de eventos adversos serios no difirió entre ambos grupos. Los resultados del estudio MILES demuestran que, comparado con placebo, sirolimus produce un efecto en algunos desenlaces clínicos como lo son el VEF 1 , la CVF, la calidad de vida y el desempeño funcional; sin embargo, la magnitud de tal efecto aún es incierta. No obstante, los resultados del estudio MILES indican que sirolimus podría ser útil en el tratamiento de pacientes con LAM con afectación moderada de la función pulmonar. Al mismo tiempo, es necesario tener en cuenta que la LAM es una condición progresiva asociada a comorbilidad y complicaciones significativas que afectan la calidad de vida de estos pacientes, y que, en el contexto de EsSalud, existe un vacío terapéutico para esta población específica. Además, a pesar de las limitaciones de la evidencia, las recomendaciones de uso de sirolimus por parte de nuestro experto clínico y la GPC revisada en este dictamen son favorables, lo cual, sumado a un perfil de seguridad aceptable, el costo asequible y la amplia experiencia de su uso en la institución, constituyen un sustento razonable para recomendar sirolimus en pacientes con LAM con cuadro clínico, con complicaciones y/o deterioro de la función pulmonar. Estas razones conllevan a la conclusión de que sirolimus tendría un balance de riesgo/beneficio y un costo de oportunidad favorable para esta enfermedad progresiva y poco frecuente que carece de tratamientos específicos disponibles en la institución. En consecuencia, y sobre la base de los argumentos expuestos, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación aprueba el uso de sirolimus para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con LAM con cuadro clínico, con complicaciones y/o deterioro de la función pulmonar, la vigencia del presente dictamen preliminar es de un año. Asimismo, se debe asegurar un sistema de fármacovigilancia intensiva de los pacientes que lleguen a usar sirolimus, Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de nueva evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: As part of liver transplantation, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections resulting from the immune response of the body against transplanted organ or tissues from a different person whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until October 2016 to identify randomised clinical trials on immunosuppression for liver transplantation. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adult participants undergoing liver transplantation (or liver retransplantation) for any reason. We excluded trials in which participants had undergone multivisceral transplantation or participants with established graft rejections. We considered any of the various maintenance immunosuppressive regimens compared with each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. MAIN RESULTS: We included a total of 26 trials (3842 participants) in the review, and 23 trials (3693 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The vast majority of the participants underwent primary liver transplantation. All of the trials were at high risk of bias, and all of the evidence was of low or very low quality. In addition, because of sparse data involving trials at high risk of bias, it is not possible to entirely rely on the results of the network meta-analysis. The trials included mainly participants undergoing primary liver transplantation of varied aetiologies. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 3 to 144 months. The most common maintenance immunosuppression used as a control was tacrolimus. There was no evidence of difference in mortality (21 trials; 3492 participants) or graft loss (15 trials; 2961 participants) at maximal follow-up between the different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based on the network meta-analysis. In the direct comparison, based on a single trial including 222 participants, tacrolimus plus sirolimus had increased mortality (HR 2.76, 95% CrI 1.30 to 6.69) and graft loss (HR 2.34, 95% CrI 1.28 to 4.61) at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with serious adverse events (1 trial; 719 participants), proportion of people with any adverse events (2 trials; 940 participants), renal impairment (8 trials; 2233 participants), chronic kidney disease (1 trial; 100 participants), graft rejections (any) (16 trials; 2726 participants), and graft rejections requiring treatment (5 trials; 1025 participants) between the different immunosuppressive regimens. The network meta-analysis showed that the number of adverse events was lower with cyclosporine A than with many other immunosuppressive regimens (12 trials; 1748 participants), and the risk of retransplantation (13 trials; 1994 participants) was higher with cyclosporine A than with tacrolimus (HR 3.08, 95% CrI 1.13 to 9.90). None of the trials reported number of serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, or costs. FUNDING: 14 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies who would benefit from the results of the trial; two trials were funded by parties who had no vested interest in the results of the trial; and 10 trials did not report the source of funding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on low-quality evidence from a single small trial from direct comparison, tacrolimus plus sirolimus increases mortality and graft loss at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. Based on very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis, we found no evidence of difference between different immunosuppressive regimens. We found very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis and low-quality evidence from direct comparison that cyclosporine A causes more retransplantation compared with tacrolimus. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid postrandomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft loss, renal impairment, chronic kidney disease, and retransplantation. Such trials should use tacrolimus as one of the control groups. Moreover, such trials ought to be designed in such a way as to ensure low risk of bias and low risks of random errors.

Assessment of vascular response to BiOSS LIM C® stents vs Orsiro® stents in the porcine coronary artery model.

AIMS: The optimal treatment strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions is still unknown. The aim of the study was to assess applicability of the new cobalt-chromium version of the sirolimus-eluting dedicated bifurcation BiOSS® LIM C stent in comparison with regular sirolimus-eluting Orsiro®  stent in a porcine coronary model. METHODS: A total of 13 BiOSS® LIM C stents and 6 Orsiro® stents were implanted in normal nonatherosclerotic porcine straight coronary arteries of six animals using 1.2:1.0 stent-to-artery ratio. Stent geometry and morphology were evaluated by Faxitron imaging. Vascular response was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and histological analyses. RESULTS: OCT performed at 28 days confirmed that all stents were patent with no signs of thrombus. In morphometric analysis, no differences between groups regarding stent diameter (P=.141), neointima area (P=.247), % area stenosis (P=.293), or % diameter stenosis (P=.069) were observed. Also, no significant differences were noted between groups regarding their histopathology scores. The injury and inflammation scores were low (mean grade<1) in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The novel BiOSS® LIM C stent demonstrates good short-term vascular effects in a porcine coronary bifurcation model which are comparable with Orsiro® stents.

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES: To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS: Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS: For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled. FUTURE WORK: High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome. CONCLUSION: Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation followed by induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) and rabbit antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin (Thymoglobuline,(®) Sanofi) as induction therapy and immediate-release tacrolimus [Adoport(®) (Sandoz); Capexion(®) (Mylan); Modigraf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Perixis(®) (Accord Healthcare); Prograf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Tacni(®) (Teva); Vivadex(®) (Dexcel Pharma)], prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf,(®) Astellas Pharma); belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix,(®) Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) [Arzip(®) (Zentiva), CellCept(®) (Roche Products), Myfenax(®) (Teva), generic MMF is manufactured by Accord Healthcare, Actavis, Arrow Pharmaceuticals, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Mylan, Sandoz and Wockhardt], mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus (Rapamune,(®) Pfizer) and everolimus (Certican,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as maintenance therapy in children and adolescents undergoing renal transplantation. DATA SOURCES: Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted to 7 January 2015 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science [via Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)], Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted to 15 January 2015 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Databases (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and EconLit (via EBSCOhost). REVIEW METHODS: Titles and abstracts were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria, as were full texts of identified studies. Included studies were extracted and quality appraised. Data were meta-analysed when appropriate. A new discrete time state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed; graft function, and incidences of acute rejection and new-onset diabetes mellitus were used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four non-RCTs were included. The RCTs only evaluated BAS and tacrolimus (TAC). No statistically significant differences in key outcomes were found between BAS and placebo/no induction. Statistically significantly higher graft function (p < 0.01) and less biopsy-proven acute rejection (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.57) was found between TAC and ciclosporin (CSA). Only one cost-effectiveness study was identified, which informed NICE guidance TA99. BAS [with TAC and azathioprine (AZA)] was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) versus no induction (BAS was dominant). BAS (with CSA and MMF) was not predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus no induction (BAS was dominated). TAC (with AZA) was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus CSA (TAC was dominant). A model based on adult evidence suggests that at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000-30,000 per QALY, BAS and TAC are cost-effective in all considered combinations; MMF was also cost-effective with CSA but not TAC. LIMITATIONS: The RCT evidence is very limited; analyses comparing all interventions need to rely on adult evidence. CONCLUSIONS: TAC is likely to be cost-effective (vs. CSA, in combination with AZA) at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. Analysis based on one RCT found BAS to be dominant, but analysis based on another RCT found BAS to be dominated. BAS plus TAC and AZA was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY when all regimens were compared using extrapolated adult evidence. High-quality primary effectiveness research is needed. The UK Renal Registry could form the basis for a prospective primary study. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013544. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research HTA programme.