Outcomes, complications, and economic impact of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation: A single-center Japanese cohort study.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKT) has been reported to have a higher rate of early complications and higher medical costs than ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABO-CLKT). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, complications, and medical costs between ABO-ILKTs and ABO-CLKTs at 2 years post-transplantation. We included 65 ABO-ILKTs and 94 ABO-CLKTs in this retrospective analysis. The patient survival, graft survival, rejection incidence, and graft function were similar between ABO-CLKT and ABO-ILKT. The hospitalization costs for ABO-CLKT and ABO-ILKT were 26 544 ± 4168 USD and 34 906 ± 18 732 USD, respectively (P = 0.0001). Total 2-year medical costs were 77 117 ± 15 609 USD and 85 325 ± 33 997 USD for ABO-CLKT and ABO-ILKT, respectively, indicating that the medical costs of ABO-ILKT recipients were non-significantly higher than those of ABO-CLKT recipients at 2 years post-transplantation (P = 0.0866). ABO-ILKT and ABO-CLKT recipients showed similar infectious adverse events and complications. In conclusion, medical cost at 2 years post-transplantation, including transplant hospitalization cost, and the frequency of early complications were not significantly higher in the ABO-ILKT group than in the ABO-CLKT group. ABO-ILKT is an acceptable treatment for patients with ESRD and is comparable to ABO-CLKT not only in terms of outcomes but also in terms of medical cost.

A2 to B Kidney Transplantation in the Post-Kidney Allocation System Era: A 3-year Experience with Anti-A Titers, Outcomes, and Cost.

BACKGROUND: The new kidney allocation systems (KAS) instituted December 2014 permitted A2 to B deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKTx) to improve access and reduce disparities in wait time for minorities. A recent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) analysis, however, indicated only 4.5% of B candidates were registered for A2 kidneys. Cited barriers to A2 to B DDKTx include titer thresholds, patient eligibility, and increased costs. There are little published data on post-transplantation anti-A titers or outcomes of A2 to B DDKTx since this allocation change. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, single center, cohort analysis of 29 consecutive A2 to B and 50 B to B DDKTx from December 2014 to December 2017. Pre- and postoperative anti-A titers were monitored prospectively. Outcomes included post-transplant anti-A titers, patient and graft survival, renal function, and hospital costs. RESULTS: African Americans comprised 72% of the A2 to B and 60% of the B to B group. There was no difference in mean wait time (58.8 vs 70.8 months). Paired tests indicated that anti-A IgG titers in A2 to B DDKTx were increased at discharge (p = 0.001) and at 4 weeks (p = 0.037). There were no significant differences in patient or graft survival, serum creatinine (SCr), or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), but the trajectories of SCr and eGFR differed between groups over the follow-up period. A2 to B had significantly higher mean transplant total hospital costs ($114,638 vs $91,697, p < 0.001) and hospital costs net organ acquisition costs ($42,356 vs $20,983, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial experience under KAS shows comparable outcomes for A2 to B vs B to B DDKTx. Anti-A titers increased significantly post-transplantation, but did not adversely affect outcomes. Hospital costs were significantly higher with A2 to B DDKTx. Transplant programs, regulators, and payors will need to weigh improved access for minorities with increased costs.

Evaluating safety and cost-effectiveness of platelets stored in additive solution (PAS-F) as a hemolysis risk mitigation strategy.

BACKGROUND: Platelet inventory constraints can result in minor ABO incompatibility and possible hemolysis. The aims of this study were to determine the reduction of isoagglutinin in titers of platelets stored in additive solution (PAS) and compare its safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness with full-volume and plasma-reduced platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Isoagglutinin titers were performed in paired whole blood donor samples and apheresis platelets collected in PAS (PAS-PLT) aliquot samples by the tube method. RESULTS: A total of 149 pairs of donor/platelet samples were tested: 75 group O, 59 group A, and 15 group B. For group O donor samples, the median anti-A IgG and IgM were 64 and 16, respectively, and the median anti-B IgG and IgM were 64 and 16, respectively. For group O PAS-PLT samples the mean anti-A IgG and IgM, and anti-B IgG and IgM were 32 and 8, and 16 and 8, respectively. For group A donor samples, the mean anti-B IgG and IgM was 8 in both cases; and both titers decreased to 2 in PAS-PLT. For group B donor samples, mean anti-A IgG and IgM was 16 in both cases; and both titers decreased to 4 in PAS-PLT. PAS-PLT demonstrated a net reduction in cost and improved efficiency when compared to plasma reduction. The use of PAS-PLT resulted in a 40% reduction of allergic transfusion reactions. CONCLUSION: The use of PAS decreases plasma isoagglutinin titers, transfusion reactions, and is cost-effective when compared to routine plasma reduction as a strategy to mitigate hemolysis risk from minor incompatible platelet transfusion.

Four-Way Kidney Exchange Transplant With Desensitization Increases Access to Living-Donor Kidney Transplant: First Report From India.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports our experience of the first 4-way kidney exchange transplant combined with desensitization in India, which allows increased access to living-donor kidney transplant for sensitized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-way kidney exchange transplant procedures were approved by the ethics committee of our institution and the Organ Transplantation Authorization Committee of state governments of India (as per the Transplantation of Human Organs Act of India). The protocols conformed to Declaration of Istanbul principles and the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from patients, donors, and their guardians. RESULTS: In April 2016, our transplant team completed simultaneous 4-way kidney exchange transplant procedures without any medical (rejection and infections) or surgical complications. Reasons for being included for kidney exchange transplant were ABO incom-patible (2 recipients) and sensitization (2 recipients). All 4 recipients had stable graft function with no proteinuria and donor-specific antibody at 11-month follow-up on standard triple immunosup-pression. Patient and graft survival rates were both 100%. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first single-center report of 4-way kidney exchange transplant combined with desensitization from India. This procedure has the potential to expand living-donor kidney transplant in disadvantaged groups (eg, sensitized patients). Recipients who are hard to match due to high panel reactive antibody and difficult to desensitize due to strong donor-specific antibodies can receive a transplant with a combination of kidney exchange and desensitization. Our study suggests that 4-way kidney exchange transplant can be performed in developing countries (India) similar to that shown in programs in developed countries with team work, kidney exchange registry, and counseling.

A2 /A2 B to B Renal Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

One component of the new national kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States that was implemented on December 4, 2014, was the allocation of kidneys from A2 and A2 B (A, non-A1 and AB, non-A1 B) deceased donors into blood group B candidates (A2 /A2 B → B). In so far as this is an important component of the new KAS that has the potential to further increase the access to transplantation for blood group B candidates on the waiting list, most of whom are minority candidates, we will review the body of evidence and historical perspectives that led to its inclusion in the new KAS. This review will also describe prospects for more widespread use of A2 /A2 B → B transplantation and a novel mechanism of humoral immunosuppression in B patients before and after transplantation with an A2 or A2 B kidney.

Economic Impacts of ABO-Incompatible Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Study of Medicare-Insured Recipients.

The infrequent use of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation in the United States may reflect concern about the costs of necessary preconditioning and posttransplant care. Medicare data for 26 500 live donor kidney transplant recipients (2000 to March 2011), including 271 ABOi and 62 A2-incompatible (A2i) recipients, were analyzed to assess the impact of pretransplant, transplant episode and 3-year posttransplant costs. The marginal costs of ABOi and A2i versus ABO-compatible (ABOc) transplants were quantified by multivariate linear regression including adjustment for recipient, donor and transplant factors. Compared with ABOc transplantation, patient survival (93.2% vs. 88.15%, p = 0.0009) and death-censored graft survival (85.4% vs. 76.1%, p < 0.05) at 3 years were lower after ABOi transplant. The average overall cost of the transplant episode was significantly higher for ABOi ($65 080) compared with A2i ($36 752) and ABOc ($32 039) transplantation (p < 0.001), excluding organ acquisition. ABOi transplant was associated with high adjusted posttransplant spending (marginal costs compared to ABOc - year 1: $25 044; year 2: $10 496; year 3: $7307; p < 0.01). ABOi transplantation provides a clinically effective method to expand access to transplantation. Although more expensive, the modest increases in total spending are easily justified by avoiding long-term dialysis and its associated morbidity and cost.

First Report on the OPTN National Variance: Allocation of A2 /A2 B Deceased Donor Kidneys to Blood Group B Increases Minority Transplantation.

In 2002, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Minority Affairs Committee (MAC) implemented a national, prospective, "variance of practice" to allow deceased donor, ABO blood group incompatible, A2 antigen, kidney transplantation into blood group B recipients; outcomes of this cohort were compared to ABO compatible recipients. The goal of the variance was to increase the number of transplants to B candidates without negatively impacting survival or compromising system equity. Only B recipients with low anti-A IgG titers (<1:8) were eligible to receive these kidneys. Across eight participating Donation Service Areas (DSA), there were 101 A2 /A2 B to B transplants through 12/31/11, of which the majority of the recipients (61%) were ethnic minorities. At 12, 24, and 36 months, Kaplan-Meier graft survival rates for the B recipients of A2 /A2 B kidneys were 95.0%, 90.6%, and 85.4%, respectively, comparable to outcomes for B recipients of B kidneys, 92.6%, 87.9%, and 82.5%, respectively (p-value = 0.48). Five DSAs increased the proportion of B transplants during 41 months postvariance, with a lesser proportional decrease in blood group A transplants. The data support the proposition that this allocation algorithm may provide a robust mechanism to increase access of blood group B minority candidates to kidney transplantation.

Outcomes Following ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Performed After Desensitization by Nonantigen-Specific Immunoadsorption.

BACKGROUND: For desensitization of ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients we recently proposed nonantigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) and rituximab. METHODS: We now compared clinical outcomes of 34 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney recipients who were transplanted using this protocol with that of 68 matched ABO-compatible patients. In addition, we analyzed efficacy and cost of nonantigen-specific as compared to blood group antigen-specific IA. RESULTS: Before desensitization, the median isoagglutinin titer of 34 ABO-incompatible patients was 1:64 (Coombs technique). Patients received a median of 7 preoperative IA treatments. Twenty-four patients had a median of 2 additional plasmapheresis treatments to reach the preoperative target isoagglutinin titer of 1:8 or less. After a median postoperative follow-up of 22 months, overall graft survival in the ABO-incompatible group was not significantly different from that in ABO-compatible patients (log-rank P = 0.20), whereas patient survival tended to be lower (log-rank P = 0.05). The incidence of rejection episodes was 15% in both groups. The ABO-incompatible kidney recipients had a higher incidence of BK virus replication (P = 0.04) and nephropathy (P = 0.01) and showed more often colonization with multidrug resistant bacteria (P = 0.02). In comparison to blood group antigen-specific IA, nonantigen-specific IA showed equal efficacy but was associated with reduction in cost. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible patients desensitized with a nonantigen-specific IA device and rituximab do not differ from that of matched ABO-compatible patients although a trend toward reduced patient survival was noted. Special attention must be paid to the higher incidence of BK virus infection in recipients of ABO-incompatible grafts.

Early clinical complications after ABO-incompatible live-donor kidney transplantation: a national study of Medicare-insured recipients.

BACKGROUND: Descriptions of the sequelae of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation are limited to single-center reports, which may lack power to detect important effects. METHODS: We examined U.S. Renal Data System registry data to study associations of ABOi live-donor kidney transplantation with clinical complications in a national cohort. Among 14,041 Medicare-insured transplants in 2000 to 2007, 119 non-donor-A2 ABOi transplants were identified. A2-incompatible (n=35) transplants were categorized separately. Infection and hemorrhage events were identified by diagnosis codes on billing claims. Associations of ABO incompatibility with complications were assessed by multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: Recipients of ABOi transplants experienced significantly (P<0.05) higher incidence of wound infections (12.7% vs. 7.3%), pneumonia (7.6% vs. 3.8%), and urinary tract infections (UTIs) or pyelonephritis (24.5% vs. 15.3%) in the first 90 days compared with ABO-compatible recipients. In adjusted models, ABO incompatibility was associated with twice the risk of pneumonia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-4.33) and 56% higher risk of UTIs or pyelonephritis (aHR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05-2.30) in the first 90 posttransplantation days, and 3.5 times the relative risk of wound infections in days 91 to 365 (aHR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.92-6.57). ABOi recipients, 19% of whom underwent pre- or peritransplant splenectomy, experienced twice the adjusted risk of early hemorrhage (aHR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.19-3.24). A2-incompatible transplantation was associated only with early risk of UTIs or pyelonephritis. CONCLUSION: ABOi transplantation offers patients with potential live donors an additional transplant option but with higher risks of infectious and hemorrhagic complications. Awareness of these complications may help improve protocols for the management of ABOi transplantation.

Coordinating unspecified living kidney donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier in kidney exchange.

BACKGROUND: This article studies multicenter coordination of unspecified living kidney donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier in kidney exchange. Important questions are whether such coordination should use domino paired donation or non simultaneous extended altruistic donor chains, what the length of the segments in such chains should be, when they should be terminated, and how much time should be allowed between matching rounds. Furthermore, it is controversial whether the different modalities should be coordinated centrally or locally and independently. METHODS: Kidney exchange policies are simulated using actual data from the Dutch national kidney exchange program. Sensitivity analysis is performed on the composition of the population, the time unspecified and bridge donors wait before donating to the wait list, the time between matching rounds, and donor renege rates. RESULTS: Central coordination of unspecified donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier can increase transplants by 10% (PG0.001). Especially highly sensitized and blood type O patients benefit. Sufficient time between matching rounds is essential: three-monthly exchanges result in 31% more transplants than weekly exchanges. Benefits of non simultaneous extended altruistic donor chains are limited in case of low numbers of highly sensitized patients and sufficient unspecified donors. Chains are best terminated when no further segment is part of an optimal exchange within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: There is clear synergy in the central coordination of both unspecified donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier in kidney exchange. The best configuration of a national program depends on the composition of the patient Y donor population.

External quality assessment in molecular immunohematology: the INSTAND proficiency test program.

BACKGROUND: Genotyping for red blood cell (RBC), platelet (PLT), and granulocyte antigens is a new tool for clinical pathology, transfusion medicine services, and blood banks. Proficiency in laboratory tests can be established by external quality assessments (EQAs), which are required for clinical application in many health care systems. There are few EQAs for molecular immunohematology. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the participation and pass rates in an EQA for RBC, PLT, and granulocyte antigens. This EQA was distributed by INSTAND, a large nonprofit provider of proficiency tests, twice per year since Fall 2006 as EQA Number 235 Immunohematology A (molecular diagnostic). The coordinators defined at the outset which alleles are mandatory for detection. RESULTS: The number of participants steadily increased from 51 to 73 per proficiency by Fall 2012. More than 60 institutions utilized this EQA at least once a year. Approximately 80% of them participated in RBC, 68% in PLT, and 22% in granulocyte systems. With the exceptions of RHD (82%) and granulocytes (85%), pass rates exceeded 93%. While the pass rate increased for granulocyte and decreased for the ABO system, the pass rates for the other systems changed little over 6½ years. CONCLUSIONS: The INSTAND proficiency test program was regularly used for EQA by many institutions, particularly in Central Europe. While the technical standards and pass rates in the participating laboratories were high, there has been little improvement in pass rates since 2006.

Therapeutic apheresis in kidney transplantation: a review of renal transplant immunobiology and current interventions with apheresis medicine.

Transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage renal disease. Kidney transplants convey both a significant survival advantage to the individual recipient as well as cost savings to the medical system. Circulating alloantibodies directed against donor human leukocyte antigens and blood group antigens are fairly common among potential recipients. They are known to injure allografts, shorten allograft survival, and limit access to kidney transplantation. Hence, screening for pretransplant alloantibodies using complement dependent cytotoxic cross-matching and more sensitive techniques such as the solid phase assays, have become routine in an attempt to avoid incompatible donor-recipient pairs and risk stratify those with donor specific antibodies (DSA). By removing harmful antibodies, therapeutic apheresis (TA) has become a critical tool for improving access to transplantation in cases where the immunologic risk had previously been considered unacceptable. It has also allowed us to transplant across the barrier of ABO blood group incompatibility and expand the pool of donors with reasonable success. Furthermore, it is an important tool in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Advanced apheresis technologies, such as immunoadsorption, and the use of TA in combination with innovative paired-donor exchange programs, offer the potential to further improve access and outcomes, minimizing the short comings of one single form of therapy alone.

[Apheresis in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant]. / L'aferesi nel trapianto di rene ABO-incompatibile.

Living donor kidney transplantation is the preferred therapeutic option for patients with end stage renal disease. Unfortunately, about 20-30% of potential living kidney donors are rejected because of incompatible immunological barriers such as ABO incompatibility. The newest desensitization protocols based on therapeutic apheresis and perioperative immunosuppressive drugs have allowed to overcome antibody barriers. The aim of these protocols is to wash out and suppress as many anti-A or anti-B antibodies as possible and to prevent rebound phenomena after transplantation. Standard plasmapheresis, double-filtration plasmapheresis, and selective immunoadsorption are among the most common apheresis modalities applied in ABO-incompatible transplantation. Selective immunoadsorption appears to be much safer and to have markedly increased efficacy compared with plasmapheresis, as it eliminates almost exclusively blood-group antibodies, thus avoiding plasma and coagulation abnormalities. According to the literature, long-term patient and graft survival rates are similar to those achieved with ABO-compatible kidney transplants. We have used selective immunoadsorption in two ABO-incompatible kidney transplants performed at our institution. No acute rejection was observed at 12 and 32 months' follow-up and both grafts are functioning well. Despite the widespread use of ABO-incompatible kidney transplant, however, the mechanisms of accommodation, the best desensitization protocol, the upper baseline and perioperative isoagglutinin titer limit, and the most accurate isoagglutinin measurement assay are still to be defined.

A systematic review of validated methods for identifying transfusion-related ABO incompatibility reactions using administrative and claims data.

PURPOSE: This paper aimed to systematically review algorithms to identify transfusion-related ABO incompatibility reactions in administrative data, with a focus on studies that have examined the validity of the algorithms. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Iowa Drug Information Service database, and Embase. A Google Scholar search was also conducted because of the difficulty identifying relevant studies. Reviews were conducted by two investigators to identify studies using data sources from the USA or Canada because these data sources were most likely to reflect the coding practices of Mini-Sentinel data sources. RESULTS: One study was found that validated International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) codes representing transfusion reactions. None of these cases were ABO incompatibility reactions. Several studies consistently used ICD-9-CM code 999.6, which represents ABO incompatibility reactions, and a technical report identified the ICD-10 code for these reactions. One study included the E-code E8760 for mismatched blood in transfusion in the algorithm. Another study reported finding no ABO incompatibility reaction codes in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, which contains data of 2.23 million patients who received transfusions, raising questions about the sensitivity of administrative data for identifying such reactions. Two studies reported perfect specificity, with sensitivity ranging from 21% to 83%, for the code identifying allogeneic red blood cell transfusions in hospitalized patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is no information to assess the validity of algorithms to identify transfusion-related ABO incompatibility reactions. Further information on the validity of algorithms to identify transfusions would also be useful.

Eight years of outcomes of the Dutch Living Donor Kidney Exchange Program.

In January 2004, the Dutch transplant centers agreed on a protocol for a national Living Donor Kidney Exchange Program for ABO blood type incompatible and positive cross match donor-recipient pairs. Here, we report the results of that program. All transplants performed within the Living Donor Kidney Exchange Program between January 2004 and December 2011 were analysed. We collected demographic data of recipients and donors. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed, including recipient age, donor age, and reason for participation in the exchange program. We studied overall uncensored survival and graft survival censored for death in both ABO blood type incompatible and positive cross match groups. We enrolled 472 donor-recipient combinations, consisting of 269 ABO blood type incompatible pairs and 203 positive cross match pairs. In the end, we performed 187 kidney transplants (40% of those enrolled) with 83 ABO blood type incompatible and 104 positive cross match pairs. Most of the transplanted recipients (119/187, 64%) had an age difference of less than 5 years with their original incompatible donors. The age differences with their actual donors varied widely, but the number of recipients with a donor > 5 years older was comparable to the number of recipients with a donor > 5 years younger. In the multivariate Cox analysis, age as a continuous variable was found to have a significant influence on graft failure. Nevertheless, the 5-year uncensored survival (85%) and the graft survival censored for death (89%) were excellent and comparable to the results of direct living donation. No differences were found between the ABO incompatible and the positive cross match groups. The Dutch Living Donor Kidney Exchange Program has a high transplant rate of 40%, with excellent 5 year graft survival.

Errors in transfusion: causes and measures to avoid them.

Adverse events related to medical errors are common worldwide and largely unreported. However, they represent a serious problem within the health care community, resulting in avoidable loss of life and/or extremely high costs. Likewise, errors in transfusion medicine, which most frequently involve misidentification of the patient, not rarely may have life-threatening consequences. In this review, the errors related to blood transfusion are briefly summarized along with new technologies developed for improving blood safety.

The optimal chain length for kidney paired exchanges: an analysis of the Dutch program.

Living donor kidney exchange programs offer incompatible donor-recipient pairs the opportunity to be transplanted. To increase the number of these transplants, we examined in our actual donor-recipient couples how to reach the maximum number of matches by using different chain lengths. We performed 20 match procedures in which we constructed four different chain lengths: two, up to three, up to four and unlimited. The actual inflow and outflow of donor-recipient couples for each run were taken into consideration in this analysis. The total number of matched pairs increased from 148 pairs for only two-way exchanges to 168 for three-way exchanges. When a chain length of 4 was allowed five extra couples could be matched over a period of 5 years. Unlimited chain length did not significantly affect the results. The optimal chain length for living donor kidney exchange programs is 3. Longer chains with their inherent logistic burden do not lead to significantly more transplants.

The development of a successful multiregional kidney paired donation program.

BACKGROUND: Kidney paired donation (KPD) is increasing the number of living donor transplants. Two major obstacles prevent moving KPD forward in the United States: (1) achieving a critical mass of pairs to efficiently find matches and (2) efficiently coordinating KPD transplants between multiple transplant centers. Two large regional programs, The New England Program for Kidney Exchange (NEPKE) and the Mid-Atlantic Paired Exchange Program (MAPEP) have developed a system of protocols to effectively increase the number of KPD transplants. METHODS: Incompatible pairs and nondirected donors (NDD) are referred to the system through transplant centers. Donor and recipient ABO, human leukocyte antigen, and recipient human leukocyte antigen antibody screening are used to determine potential matches. Utilization of a computer optimization algorithm matches pairs in two- and three-way exchanges, NDD chains, and list exchange chains. Team conference calls regarding transfer of information, crossmatches, surgery date, coordination of simultaneous donor nephrectomies, and other issues are coordinated as needed. RESULTS: Ten matches moved forward to donation and transplantation, and one is pending. Eight of these matches involved NDD chains, two 2-way exchanges, and 1 a list exchange chain. These matches resulted in 27 transplants. Eighteen transplants occurred in NEPKE-only transplant centers, four in MAPEP-only centers, and an additional five were crossregional. CONCLUSION: The collaboration of NEPKE and MAPEP has demonstrated that crossregional coordination is feasible and expands the number of transplants performed beyond the capability of either program alone, especially when combined with computer optimization and multiple-type matches of three-way, NDD chains, and list exchange chains.

[ABO-RH1 grouping and red blood cell antibody screening: error analysis in the French external quality assessment in 2006]. / Groupes sanguins et recherche des anticorps antiérythrocytaires: analyse d'erreurs au contrôle national de qualité en 2006.

Further to a survey set up in 2006 over 2600 laboratories by the French agency for health product safety (AFSSAPS), seven ABO grouping errors and 53 negative answers to red blood cell antibody screening with a serum containing anti-RH1 antibody, have been found. A questionnaire sent to the involved laboratories revealed non-analytical errors already met in previous cases. Besides, the analytical stage has also induced red blood cell antibody screening errors due to a wrong serum collection by the automat. Here are displayed the analysis of the questionnaire results and proposed corrections.