Cost-Utility Analysis of Midurethral Sling Timing Among Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery.

IMPORTANCE: There are no guidelines regarding the ideal timing of midurethral sling (MUS) placement following prolapse repair. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-utility of concomitant MUS versus staged MUS among women undergoing apical suspension surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-utility modeling using a decision analysis tree compared concomitant MUS with staged MUS over a 1-year time horizon. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Six scenarios were modeled to estimate cost-utilities for women with preoperative overt, occult, or no stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who underwent either minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy or vaginal native tissue apical suspension. Possible complications of de novo overactive bladder, urinary retention requiring sling lysis, mesh exposure, and persistent SUI were included. Costs from a third-party payer perspective were derived from Medicare 2022 reimbursements. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among women without preoperative SUI, staged MUS was the dominant strategy for both surgical routes with higher utility and lower costs. For women with either occult or overt SUI undergoing sacrocolpopexy or vaginal repair, concomitant MUS was cost-effective (ICER = $21,114-$96,536 per quality-adjusted life-year). Therefore, concomitant MUS is preferred for patients with preoperative SUI as higher costs were offset by higher effectiveness. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that ICERs were most affected by probability of cure following MUS. CONCLUSIONS: A staged MUS procedure is the dominant strategy for women undergoing apical prolapse repair without preoperative SUI. In women with either overt or occult SUI, the ICER was below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, suggesting that concomitant MUS surgery is cost-effective.

Assessment of Adverse Events in a Matched Cohort of Women Undergoing Concurrent Midurethral Sling at the Time of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery.

IMPORTANCE: Procedures for stress urinary incontinence and benign gynecologic surgery are often performed concurrently, and associated complication rates have previously been unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complication rates between women undergoing midurethral sling (MUS) placement at the time of benign gynecologic surgery and those undergoing MUS alone. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective matched cohort study of women undergoing MUS with or without concurrent minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery from January 2010 through December 2020. Eligible women undergoing concurrent surgery were matched to a cohort of women undergoing MUS placement alone. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic and perioperative/postoperative data up to 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-eight women met inclusion criteria for the concurrent group, and 152 women were matched accordingly. The overall adverse event rate was 39.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.55) for the concurrent group and 24.3% (95% CI, 0.18-0.32) for the MUS-only group ( P = 0.05). Adverse events with Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ 2 were higher in the concurrent group (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1: 5% vs 0%, P = 0.04; Clavien-Dindo Grade 2: 16% vs 6%, P = 0.04), as was composite postoperative resource utilization (76% vs 49%, P = 0.003). Mesh exposure ( P = 0.03) and sling lysis/excision rates ( P = 0.02) were higher in the concurrent group. On logistic regression, concurrent surgery cases remained significantly associated with sling mesh erosion (adjusted odds ratio, 12.6; 95% CI, 1.4-116.4). CONCLUSIONS: Midurethral sling placement at the time of minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgery is safe but is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative hospital resource utilization and sling mesh extrusion, and a need for revision.

Quality of Pre-operative Assessment for Mid Urethral Slings in Women Who Present With Mesh Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To study quality of pre- and post-operative evaluation in women undergoing mid-urethral synthetic sling surgery who subsequently have complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study inclusion was chart availability for preoperative clinical history, examination, urodynamics and/or post-operative visit in women with mesh complications 2014-2021 in a tertiary practice. The primary outcome was compliance with quality indicators and guidelines for preoperative and post-operative clinical evaluation and urodynamics. RESULTS: 122 women had preoperative, 102 urodynamic reports and 108 post-operative charts available for review. Only clinical history and examination showed moderate compliance (71% nature, 57% severity, 87% exam) with quality indicators, all other quality indicators were low. including documentation of counselling of mesh risks (11%) and risks of incontinence surgery (17%) . Compliance with guidelines (optimal care) was also low (bladder diary 61%, all others ≤41%). Post-operative evaluation did not comprehensively screen for complication e.g., flow rate/post-void residual performed in 9%. A significant proportion had an early adverse symptom (55%) or intervention e.g. trimming of exposure (40%) CONCLUSION: Compliance with quality indicators and guidelines was generally low for pre-operative evaluation and urodynamic testing. There was inadequate content and length of post-operative evaluation despite a significant proportion presenting with adverse symptoms at first postoperative follow-up. Future research could target these areas for development of tools to improve compliance and education of health providers.

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic midurethral sling placement at the time of prolapse repair significantly reduces the risk for de novo stress urinary incontinence, but it is associated with some small but significant morbidities. Because there has not been a standardized approach to midurethral sling utilization, decision analysis provides a method to evaluate the cost and effectiveness associated with varying midurethral sling placement strategies in addressing the risk for de novo stress urinary incontinence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of the 3 midurethral sling utilization strategies in treating de novo stress urinary incontinence 1 year after vaginal prolapse repair. The 3 approaches are (1) staged strategy in which prolapse repair is done without prophylactic midurethral sling placement, (2) universal sling placement in which prolapse repair is accompanied by prophylactic midurethral sling placement, and (3) selective sling placement in which prolapse repair is accompanied by prophylactic midurethral sling placement only in patients with a positive prolapse-reduced cough stress test. STUDY DESIGN: We created a decision analysis model to compare staged strategy, universal sling placement, and selective sling placement. We modeled probabilities of de novo stress urinary incontinence, patients choosing subsequent midurethral sling surgery for de novo stress urinary incontinence, and outcomes related to midurethral sling placement. De novo stress urinary incontinence rates were determined for each strategy from published data. The likelihood of patients with de novo stress urinary incontinence choosing midurethral sling surgery as their first-line treatment was also determined from the literature, and this scenario was only applied to patients without prophylactic midurethral sling placement at their index prolapse repair. Finally, outcomes related to midurethral sling placement, including recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence, voiding dysfunction requiring sling lysis, mesh exposure requiring excision, and de novo overactive bladder requiring medications, were all derived from publicly available data. All midurethral sling placement procedures were assumed to be retropubic. The costs for each procedure were obtained from the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule or from previous literature with convertion to 2020 equivalent US dollar prices using the Consumer Price Index. The primary outcome was modeled as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We performed multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses to assess model robustness. RESULTS: The lowest-cost strategy was the staged strategy, which cost $1051.70 per patient, followed by $1093.75 for selective sling placement and $1125.54 for universal sling placement. The selective sling approach, however, had the highest health utility value; therefore, universal sling placement was dominated by selective sling placement because it is both less costly and more effective. When compared with the staged strategy, selective sling placement was cost effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2664 per quality adjusted life-years, meeting the predetermined threshold. In multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses, the variable with the largest effect was the percentage of patients electing to undergo subsequent midurethral sling surgery for de novo stress urinary incontinence after the index surgery. Only when this proportion exceeded 62% did universal sling placement become the cost-effective option because selective sling placement surpassed the predetermined incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold and became dominated. CONCLUSION: Selective sling placement was the preferred and cost-effective strategy in treating de novo stress urinary incontinence 1 year after vaginal prolapse repair. Surgeons should counsel their patients preoperatively regarding the possibility of de novo stress urinary incontinence after prolapse repair, as well as on the benefits and risks of prophylactic midurethral sling placement surgery.

Mortality and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling Versus Urethral Bulking in Older Women.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in mortality, retreatment rates, and comorbidities that may be risk factors for retreatment among Medicare beneficiaries (age 65+) undergoing midurethral sling vs urethral bulking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the 5% limited data set from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services between 2010 and 2018. Beneficiaries age 65 or older who underwent sling or bulking without concomitant surgery from 2011 to 2014 were included and followed until reoperation or retreatment, loss of Medicare, death, or December 31, 2018. Repeat procedures for ongoing stress incontinence or complication were included. Associations between index treatment and need for a secondary procedure were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 5.7 years for 1,700 patients undergoing sling and 5.2 years for 875 patients undergoing bulking. Within 5 years, 10.2% of sling patients and 23.2% of bulking patients had died. When controlling for age, race, and comorbidities, bulking patients were 1.73 times more likely than sling patients to die during the study period. Bulking patients were significantly more likely to have 12 of the 16 of the medical comorbidities evaluated. By 5 years, 6.7% of sling patients had been retreated for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared with 24.6% of bulking patients. Apart from hypertension, none of the comorbidities evaluated was associated with a difference in the risk of a subsequent surgical procedure. Members of racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to be retreated. CONCLUSION: Older adults undergoing bulking are notably sicker and have shorter life expectancy as compared with those undergoing sling, suggesting these factors heavily guide patient selection. Comorbidities do not predispose patients to reoperation or retreatment.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Early Sling Loosening Versus Delayed Sling Lysis in the Management of Voiding Dysfunction After Midurethral Sling Placement.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the management for ongoing voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling placement, including early sling loosening and delayed sling lysis. METHODS: A Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of early sling loosening (2 weeks) versus delayed sling lysis (6 weeks) for the management of persisting voiding dysfunction/retention after midurethral sling placement. A literature review provided rates of resolution of voiding dysfunction with conservative management, complications, recurrent stress urinary incontinence, or ongoing retention, as well as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were based on 2020 Medicare reimbursement rates. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: At 1 year, early sling loosening resulted in increased costs ($3,575 vs $1,836) and higher QALYs (0.948 vs 0.925) compared with delayed sling lysis. This translated to early sling loosening being the most cost-effective strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $74,382/QALY. The model was sensitive to multiple variables on our 1-way sensitivity analysis. For example, delayed sling lysis became cost-effective if the rate of voiding dysfunction resolution with conservative management was greater than or equal to 57% or recurrent stress urinary incontinence after early loosening was greater than or equal to 9.6%. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 100,000/QALY, early sling loosening was cost-effective in 82% of microsimulations in probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Early sling loosening represents a more cost-effective management method in resolving ongoing voiding dysfunction after sling placement. These findings may favor early clinical management in patients with voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling placement.

Frailty Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Complications and Need for Repeat Procedures after Sling Surgery in Older Adults.

PURPOSE: Sling surgery is the gold standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women. While data support the use of sling surgery in younger and middle-aged women, outcomes in older, frail women are largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were examined for all Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old who underwent sling surgery with or without concomitant prolapse repair from 2014 to 2016. Beneficiaries were stratified using the Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI) into 4 categories: not frail (CFI <0.15), prefrail (0.15 ≤CFI <0.25), mildly frail (0.25 ≤CFI <0.35) and moderately to severely frail (CFI ≥0.35). Outcomes included rates and relative risk of 30-day complications, 1-year mortality and repeat procedures for persistent incontinence or obstructed voiding at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 54,112 women underwent sling surgery during the study period, 5.2% of whom were mildly to moderately to severely frail. Compared to the not frail group, moderately to severely frail beneficiaries demonstrated an increased adjusted relative risk (aRR) of 30-day complications (56.5%; aRR 2.5, 95% CI: 2.2-2.9) and 1-year mortality (10.5%; aRR 6.7, 95% CI: 4.0-11.2). Additionally, there were higher rates of repeat procedures in mildly to severely frail beneficiaries (6.6%; aRR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6) compared to beneficiaries who were not frail. CONCLUSIONS: As frailty increased, there was an increased relative risk of 30-day complications, 1-year mortality and need for repeat procedures for persistent incontinence or obstructed voiding at 1 year. While there were fewer sling surgeries in performed frail women, the observed increase in complication rates was significant. Frailty should be strongly considered before pursuing sling surgery in older women.

Male sling placement for post-prostatectomy incontinence can involve a lengthy learning curve: A multi-outcome assessment via cumulative sum failure analysis.

PURPOSES: Little research exists on potential learning curve for male sling procedures. We aimed to perform a learning curve analysis of a single surgeon's experience of sling placement evaluating multiple outcomes and using the cumulative sum failure methodology. METHODS: The study included 65 consecutive patients that underwent implantation of a fixed transobturator sling (TiLOOP Male) for post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence at our institution from January 2013 to December 2018. Dichotomous outcomes evaluated with cumulative sum failure analysis included 12-months continence defined based on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire (primary outcome), 24 h pad test and, 24 h pad use, operative time (⩽/>60 min), and complications (yes/no). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of the procedures' chronological sequence number with the outcomes. RESULTS: Cumulative sum failure curves revealed a clear and lengthy learning curve effect for most of subjective and quantitative continence outcomes and for operative time. For the primary outcome (at least much improved at PGI-I), 62 procedures were required to overcome the learning curve. Accordingly, multivariate analyses showed that the sequence number was statistically significant for predicting failures based on PGI-I (adjusted OR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99; p = 0.02), objective outcomes, and operative time. CONCLUSIONS: An evident and lengthy learning curve was observed in our series of male sling placement to achieve the end level of proficiency, independently from case-mix. Individualized structured training on male sling surgery will benefit patients treated in the initial surgeon's experience. Surgical experience should be considered when reporting studies on male slings.

Translabial Ultrasound for Assessment of Synthetic Midurethral Sling Complications.

ABSTRACT: Translabial ultrasound (TLUS) is an inexpensive, noninvasive imaging modality traditionally used for assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. The utility of TLUS has recently been expanded to the evaluation of synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) surgically implanted for management of stress urinary incontinence. The purpose of this article is to familiarize radiologists with translabial ultrasound technique and provide a technical protocol for TLUS execution because it can be optimized for imaging and assessment of MUS, including identification of MUS configuration and recognition of common complications. This article provides example images of transobturator and retropubic slings and their associated complications, as visualized on TLUS. Accurate imaging and assessment of MUS is helpful in the evaluation of the patient presenting with symptoms suspicious for sling-related complications and in the planning of surgical revision.

Comparative Assessment of Female Sexual Function Following Transobturator Midurethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a significant social problem. According to the World Health Organization, UI affects as much as 30% of premenopausal women and 60% of postmenopausal women. Urinary incontinence can lead to certain problems that negatively affect a woman's sex life. They result from the fact that certain processes take place in the body during intercourse. As a result of orgasm, the intra-abdominal pressure increases, which in women with urinary incontinence can cause an uncontrolled leakage of urine. The discomfort that this causes, in turn, lowers sexual attractiveness, as well as causes embarrassment. The study involved 50 patients hospitalized in the period from February to May 2019 at the Gynecology Department of the Independent Public Healthcare Center of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Wroclaw. All patients underwent surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence using the transobturator tape (TOT) method. To assess sexuality, the international standardized Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Analysis of the results obtained from the FSFI questionnaire shows that the operation significantly affects the reduction in pain sensation during intercourse, a reduction in the sensation of sexual arousal, and a worsening vaginal wetness. Stress urinary incontinence significantly affects women's sex life.

Post-hospital syndrome predicts poor postoperative outcomes and increased cost following transvaginal midurethral sling placement.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Post-hospital syndrome (PHS), a 90-day period of health vulnerability related to physiologic stressors following recent inpatient admission, has been observed in surgical and non-surgical patients. We aim to explore its effects on readmission and complication rates in patients undergoing elective female mid-urethral sling placement for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database, State Emergency Department Database, and State Ambulatory Surgery Database for Florida between 2009 and 2014 were linked and utilized. Patients were identified as having undergone an outpatient mid-urethral sling placement with or without cystoscopy by CPT code. The primary exposure was PHS, defined as any inpatient admission within 90 days of mid-urethral sling placement. Patients with inpatient hospitalizations within 1 year of sling procedure were categorized based on timing of prior admission and analyzed. The primary outcomes were 30-day hospital readmission, rates of postoperative ED visits, minor/major complications rates, and overall 30-day cost. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to assess independent predictors of adverse surgical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 17,081 female patients who underwent mid-urethral sling procedures were identified. Patients with PHS were at higher risk for 30-day readmission [OR: 5.36 (IQR: 3.61-7.93); p < 0.005], 30-day ED visits [OR: 2.38 (IQR: 1.75-3.25); p < 0.005], major complications [OR: 6.22 (IQR: 4.67-8.29); p < 0.005], and minor complications [OR: 4.62 (IQR: 3.77-5.67); p < 0.005]. This risk was time dependent in nature with a decreasing risk profile the further surgery was from index hospitalization. Furthermore, PHS patients were more likely to incur an increased cost burden with an average 30-day increased cost of $705.80. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization within 90 days prior to mid-urethral sling placement is a risk-adjusted, independent predictor of increased rates of 30-day readmission rates, 30-day ED visits, 30-day minor/major complications, and increased hospital-related cost. Clinical and surgical outcomes may be improved with consideration of prior hospitalizations in determining the timing of mid-urethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence.

The Disability Impact and Associated Cost per Disability in Women Who Underwent Surgical Revision of Transvaginal Mesh Kits for Prolapse Repair.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate disability impact in patients and cost to the families of patients who have had complications of transvaginal prolapse mesh kits and underwent surgical revision. METHODS: Patients who developed complications of transvaginal mesh kits for prolapse and who had undergone vaginal prolapse mesh surgical revision/removal in 2009 to 2014 at a single institution were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. The group was invited to complete a phone survey pertaining to the initial vaginal mesh used for prolapse surgery utilizing Sheehan Disability Scale (scale 0-10) and Years of life Lived with Disability (YLDs) questionnaires. The data collected were used to estimate the disability and cost analysis. We used our data to estimate the economic and quality-of-life impact of vaginal mesh complications on patients in the United States RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (62/198 [31.2%]) were consented to participate and completed the questionnaires by phone. Extremely disabled patients were 18 (29%) of 62 of whole cases, and 5 (8%) of 62 reported that they had no disability after vaginal mesh surgery. The median for overall disability score after vaginal mesh procedure was 8 (which reflects marked disability on a scale of 0-10). The majority of patients missed a median of 12 months of their school or work because of their mesh complications. Thirty-seven (59.6%) of 62 did not improve after mesh removal. Twenty-one (33.9%) of 62 stated that their family income dropped because of productivity loss related to mesh complications. The mean time between vaginal mesh surgery and mesh removal procedure was 4.7 years. Sheehan Disability Scale scores are significantly correlated with YLDs outcomes. Patients' overall disability score showed a significant correlation with YLDs scores (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal mesh for prolapse reduction complications had a sustained disability impact that continued despite mesh removal. Likewise, the complications were associated with increased economic burden on the families of the effected individuals and a drop in the family income in more than one third of the families.

Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence constitutes a significant health and economic burden to society. Traditional suburethral slings are one of the surgical operations used to treat women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of traditional suburethral slings on stress or mixed incontinence in comparison with other management options. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 3 June 2010) and the reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials that included traditional suburethral slings for the treatment of stress or mixed urinary incontinence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least three reviewers independently extracted data from included trials onto a standard form and assessed trial methodological quality. The data abstracted were relevant to predetermined outcome measures. Where appropriate, we calculated a summary statistic: a relative risk for dichotomous data and a weighted mean difference for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 trials involving 2284 women. The quality of evidence was moderate for most trials and there was generally short follow-up ranging from 6 to 24 months.One medium-sized trial compared traditional suburethral sling operations with oxybutynin in the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence. Surgery appeared to be more effective than drugs in treating participant-reported incontinence (n = 75, risk ratio (RR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.43).One trial found that traditional slings were more effective than transurethral injectable treatment (RR for clinician-assessed incontinence within a year 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.21)Seven trials compared slings with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension. Participant-reported incontinence was lower with the slings after one year (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), but not when assessed by clinicians. Colposuspension, however, was associated with fewer peri-operative complications, shorter duration of use of indwelling catheter and less long-term voiding dysfunction. One study showed there was a 20% lower risk of bladder perforation with the sling procedure but a 50% increase in urinary tract infection with the sling procedure compared with colposuspension. Fewer women developed prolapse after slings (compared with after colposuspension) in two small trials but this did not reach statistical significance.Twelve trials addressed the comparison between traditional sling operations and minimally invasive sling operations. These seemed to be equally effective in the short term (RR for incontinence within first year 0.97, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.20) but minimally invasive slings had a shorter operating time, fewer peri-operative complications (other than bladder perforation) and some evidence of less post-operative voiding dysfunction and detrusor symptoms.Six trials compared one type of traditional sling with another. Materials included porcine dermis, lyophilised dura mater, fascia lata, vaginal wall, autologous dermis and rectus fascia. Participant-reported improvement rates within the first year favoured the traditional autologous material rectus fascia over other biological materials (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.98). There were more complications with the use of non-absorbable Gore-Tex in one trial.Data for comparison of bladder neck needle suspension with suburethral slings were inconclusive because they came from a single trial with a small specialised population.No trials compared traditional suburethral slings with anterior repair, laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension or artificial sphincters. Most trials did not distinguish between women having surgery for primary or recurrent incontinence when reporting participant characteristics.For most of the comparisons, clinically important differences could not be ruled out. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Traditional slings seem to be as effective as minimally invasive slings, but had higher rates of adverse effects. This should be interpreted with some caution however, as the quality of evidence for the studies was variable, follow-up short and populations small, particularly for identifying complication rates. Tradional sling procedures appeared to confer a similar cure rate in comparison to open retropubic colposuspension, but the long-term adverse event profile is still unclear. A brief economic commentary (BEC) identified two studies suggesting that traditional slings may be more cost-effective compared with collagen injection but not cost-effective when compared with minimally invasive sling operations. Reliable evidence to clarify whether or not traditional suburethral slings may be better or worse than other surgical or conservative management options is lacking.

Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound: does it correlate with outcomes 1 year following surgery?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To correlate dynamic assessment of sling function using 2D and 3D transperineal ultrasound with outcomes following transobturator sling surgery. METHODS: This is an unmatched case-control study of 100 patients who underwent transobturator sling surgery at our center between 2009 and 2012. Group A (n = 50) patients had successful outcomes and group B (n = 50) patients had suboptimal outcomes 1 year following surgery. The patients underwent 2D dynamic and 3D transperineal ultrasound. The two groups were compared with regard to the deformability of the sling on Valsalva, the concordance of urethral movement with the sling, and location of the sling. RESULTS: When compared with group B, group A had a significantly greater number of patients in whom the sling deformed at Valsalva (flat at rest, curving into a c-shape at Valsalva), the urethral movement was concordant with the sling and the sling had a midurethral location (p < 0.0001). In all 17 patients in group B in whom the urethra moved in a concordant manner with the sling (34%), the sling did not deform on Valsalva maneuver and was located proximally. In all 15 patients in group A in whom the sling remained either flat or curved (30%), the urethra moved concordant with the sling and the sling was in midurethral location. CONCLUSIONS: On 2D and 3D transperineal ultrasound, the best outcomes following transobturator sling surgery are associated with concordance of urethral movement with the sling, midurethral location, and deformability of the sling on dynamic assessment.

Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: For the surgical correction of apical prolapse the abdominal approach is associated with better outcomes; however, it is more expensive than the transvaginal approach. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) with sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) to determine if the improved outcomes of ASC justify the increased expense. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was created comparing ASC with SSLF using data-modeling software, TreeAge Pro (2013), which included the following outcomes: post-operative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with possible mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement, prolapse recurrence with possible re-operation, and post-operative dyspareunia. Cost-effectiveness was defined as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than $50,000 per quality-associated life year (QALY). Base-case, threshold, and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: At the baseline, ASC is more expensive than SSLF ($13,988 vs $11,950), but is more effective (QALY 1.53 vs 1.45) and is cost-effective (ICER $24,574/QALY) at 2 years. ASC was not cost-effective if the following four thresholds were met: the rate of post-operative SUI was above 36 % after ASC or below 28 % after SSLF; the rate of MUS placement for post-operative SUI was above 60 % after ASC or below 13 % after SSLF; the rate of recurrent prolapse was above 15 % after ASC or below 4 % after SSLF; the rate of post-operative dyspareunia was above 59 % after ASC or below 19 % after SSLF. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal sacral colpopexy can be cost-effective compared with sacrospinous ligament fixation; however, as the post-operative outcomes of SSLF improve, SSLF can be considered a cost-effective alternative.

Low-cost transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using ordinary polypropylene mesh.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to describe the use of ordinary polypropylene mesh and our modified helical passers through a transobturator vaginal tape inside-out technique (TVT-O) as a low-cost alternative to available commercial kits in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with evaluation of its long-term safety and efficacy. This is important in developing countries due to limited health care resources. METHODS: Tailored (11 × 1.5 cm) polypropylene tape was inserted in 59 women from June 2006 to June 2009 at the Urology Department, Cairo University Hospitals as an open prospective study. SUI was diagnosed by positive cough stress test (CST) and abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP). Patients with post-void residual urine (PVRU) > 100 ml, bladder capacity < 300 ml, or neurological lesions were excluded. The Stress and Urge Incontinence and Quality of Life Questionnaire (SUIQQ), urodynamic parameters, and other variables were compared pre- versus postoperatively with paired t, Wilcoxon signed rank, McNemar, or chi-square tests. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.47 ± 8.52 years. Twenty-one (35.6 %) patients had intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). The mean operative time was 21.22 ± 4.26 min (15-30). Procedures for prolapse were done in four (6 %) patients. Complications were vaginal discharge (6 %), dyspareunia (1 %), groin pain (20 %), urinary tract infection (3 %), obstructive symptoms (1 %), accidental cut of polypropylene suture (1 %) and felt subcutaneous polypropylene sutures (3 %). We had no cases of erosions or de novo urgency. SUIQQ indices improved significantly, while urodynamic parameters showed no significant difference postoperatively. Of the patients, 54 (91 %) were cured and 3 (5 %) improved, while failure was detected in 2 (3 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique is safe with excellent 5-year results. It should be considered as a low-cost alternative to available commercial kits in the treatment of SUI mainly for public health systems with few financial resources.

Effectiveness of mesh compared with nonmesh sling surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of mesh compared with nonmesh slings placed in different surgical settings as measured by the frequency of complications within 1 year. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing sling surgery from 2006 to 2008 in hospital outpatient departments and hospital-based ambulatory surgery centers. Slings were identified and categorized according to the use of mesh by Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes and temporary "C" Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Patients were followed for 1 year after each procedure to identify complications. Logistic models were fit to assess relationships among sling type, surgical setting, and various complications. RESULTS: We identified 6,698 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent mesh sling procedures and 445 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent nonmesh sling procedures. The overall frequency of complications was similar between the two groups at 69.8% and 72.6% in the mesh and nonmesh groups, respectively (P=.22). Infectious complications were the most common complication at 45.4% and 50.1% of the mesh and nonmesh groups, respectively (P=.06). Patients undergoing mesh procedures were less likely than patients undergoing nonmesh procedures to require management for bladder outlet obstruction (13.9% compared with 19.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.85) and were less likely to have a subsequent sling removal and revision or urethrolysis (2.7% compared with 4.7%, adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.89). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of most complications were similar regardless of the use of mesh except for the management of bladder outlet obstruction. These results did not differ based on the surgical setting where the sling procedure was performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Mesh sling in an era of uncertainty: lessons learned and the way forward.

Following transvaginal mesh, synthetic slings to correct stress urinary incontinence have been put under further scrutiny. Since the recent FDA website update, we reviewed the latest developments and then reflected on the lessons learned by applying this process and the way forward.

Changes in sexual function and quality of life after single-incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and assess the changes in sexual function and quality of life after placement of a single-incision sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence. The single-incision sling was implanted and patients were followed postoperatively for 6 months. The postoperative rate of continence, complications, changes in sexual function, and patient-reported quality of life were evaluated. Female Sexual Function in sexually active patients was evaluated before and after the single-incision sling procedure using the Female Sexual Function Index. From January 2009 to November 2011, 73 patients were enrolled and underwent the procedure to implant the MiniArc® or Ajust® single-incision sling. RESULTS: Overall, 93.2% of the patients who successfully received a single-incision sling demonstrated total restoration of continence (83.6%) or improved continence (9.6%) at the 6-month postoperative visit. Improvements were seen in the quality of life scores related to global bladder feeling (87.7%) and the Female Sexual Function Index (preoperative score 23.86±5.67 vs postoperative score 27.25±4.66 [P<0.0001]). CONCLUSION: Single-incision sling treatment for stress urinary incontinence led to improvements in continence and sexual function at 6 months of postoperative follow-up.