Real-world treatment of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia: A cross-sectional study of Japanese health insurance claims data.

OBJECTIVES: To assess gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia in Japan and review treatment conditions. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed the prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout, and characteristics and treatment of patients with those conditions, using Japanese health insurance claims and medical check-up data collected from April 2016 through March 2017. RESULTS: Among 2,531,383 persons registered in the database, 1.1% (men 1.9%, women <0.1%) were diagnosed with gout and 2.6% (4.1%, 0.4%) with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Medical check-ups showed 13.4% (19.6%, 1.0%) of patients with hyperuricemia (serum uric acid [sUA] > 7.0 mg/dL). Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) was prescribed for 80.7% of patients identified with gout and 72.4% identified with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. ULT adherence was satisfactory, but most patients were treated with low-dose ULT. Less than half of patients receiving ULT achieved the sUA target (≤6.0 mg/dL). In gout patients, the incidence of gout flare was 47.8% (0.74 flares/person-year). CONCLUSIONS: Although hyperuricemia prevalence is similar in Japan and worldwide, gout is comparatively rare in Japan. Gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia are often treated with low-dose ULT, and many patients fail to reach target sUA, suggesting that gout management is suboptimal in Japan. Patients would benefit from stricter focus on a treat-to-target approach for gout management.

Assessment of rasburicase utilization for tumor lysis syndrome management in pediatric and adult patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings.

INTRODUCTION: At Wake Forest Baptist Health, an adult tumor lysis syndrome pocket card was created in order to optimize management of tumor lysis syndrome and outline specific recommendations for the use of rasburicase. Due to the increased use of rasburicase at our institution and its cost, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of rasburicase for the management of tumor lysis syndrome in pediatric and adult patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS: This was an observational, single-center, non-randomized, retrospective chart review conducted between September 2018 and August 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the utilization of rasburicase and appropriateness for the management of tumor lysis syndrome in pediatric and adult patients based on the Wake Forest Baptist Health tumor lysis syndrome pocket card. The secondary objectives were to assess response to prophylactic and treatment doses of rasburicase and to quantify drug cost versus expense of rasburicase utilization. RESULTS: Overall, 64 patients (57 adults and 7 pediatric patients) were included in the study. Rasburicase use for tumor lysis syndrome indication adhered to the pocket card 64% of the time. Appropriate fluids and/or allopurinol were initiated in only 34% of patients. For monitoring, 80% of patients had all necessary tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values collected after rasburicase administration. All 11 patients (17%) who received rasburicase in the outpatient setting did not have follow-up labs collected. Of the patients who had tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values collected post rasburicase, 39% were appropriately timed to accurately assess efficacy of rasburicase with the median time of laboratory monitoring after rasburicase being 6.5 h. Response was observed with rasburicase 3 mg (92%), 6 mg (100%), and weight-based dosing (100%). The wholesale acquisition cost per patient was $5203 (1101-10,406). The potential cost savings of using the 3 mg dose versus the 6 mg dose for the patients who did not meet tumor lysis syndrome treatment recommendations based on the Wake Forest Baptist Health pocket card was estimated to be $36,419.46. CONCLUSION: There are several opportunities for improvement in tumor lysis syndrome management and rasburicase utilization at our institution. This study will lead to the implementation of formal restrictions for rasburicase use and selection of rasburicase dose. Updating the rasburicase order panel to include appropriate prophylaxis and require input of uric acid level, populating pertinent tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values on the order verification screen for pharmacists to appropriately assess if rasburicase meets the institution restriction criteria, and providing education to providers on the appropriate ordering and timing of labs.

Association between long-term prescription of febuxostat and the progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with hypertension and asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Both hypertension and hyperuricemia are closely associated with the morbidity and mortality of heart failure. This study was designed to evaluate the influences of long-term xanthine oxidase inhibitor (febuxostat) prescription on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, and new-onset heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in these patients. Using a propensity score matching of 1:2 ratio, this retrospective claims database study compared febuxosatat prescription (n = 96) and non-urate-lowering therapy (n = 192) in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. With a follow-up of 36 months, febuxostat significantly decreased the level of serum uric acid as well as generated more prominent improvement in LVH and LV diastolic function. Besides, the new-onset symptomatic HFpEF occurred in 2 of 96 patients in febuxostat group and 13 of 192 patients in non-urate-lowering group (P = 0.091). No increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients prescribed with febuxostat was noted. In conclusion, long-term febuxostat exposure was associated with protective effects in terms of LVH or LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertensive LVH and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Febuxostat also displayed a trend for reduced risk of new-onset HFpEF in this population.

Cost-effectiveness of sequential urate lowering therapies for the management of gout in Singapore.

Aims: Allopurinol is the most common urate lowering therapy (ULT) used to treat gout but may cause life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) in a small number of patients. Risk of SCAR is increased for patients with the HLA-B*58:01 genotype. When alternative ULT is required, febuxostat or probenecid are recommended. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis of sequential ULT treatment strategies for gout, including strategies with and without HLA-B*58:01 genotyping prior to treatment initiation, with a view to inform optimal gout management in Singapore.Materials and methods: A Markov model was developed from the Singapore healthcare payer perspective. Reflecting local practice, 12 different treatment strategies containing at least one ULT (allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid) were evaluated in adults with gout. Response rates (SUA < 6mg/dL) were derived from an in-house network meta-analysis and from published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated over a 30-year time horizon, with costs and benefits discounted at 3% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore uncertainties.Results: Sequential treatment of allopurinol 300 mg/day-allopurinol 600 mg/day-probenecid ("standard of care") was cost-effective compared to no ULT, with an ICER of SGD1,584/QALY. Allopurinol300-allopurinol600-probenecid-febuxostat sequence compared to allopurinol300-allopurinol600-probenecid had an ICER of SGD11,400/QALY. All other treatment strategies were dominated by preceding strategies. Treatment strategies incorporating HLA-B*58:01 genotyping before ULT use were dominated by the corresponding non-genotyping strategy.Conclusions: Current standard of care (allopurinol300-allopurinol 600-probenecid) for gout is cost-effective compared with no ULT in the local context. Febuxostat is unlikely to be cost-effective in Singapore at current prices unless it is used last-line.

Formulation and Characterization of Nanosized Ethosomal Formulations of Antigout Model Drug (Febuxostat) Prepared by Cold Method: In Vitro/Ex Vivo and In Vivo Assessment.

Febuxostat (FXT) is a xanthine oxidase (XO) drug which indicated for the treatment of gout. FXT loaded nanosized ethosomes were prepared using cold method with varied concentrations of ethyl alcohol and soya lecithin (SL). The prepared ethosomes were characterized by size, entrapment efficiency (DEE), FT-IR, in vitro release, kinetic studies of in vitro release profile, in vitro skin permeation and deposition, and stability study. The selected ethosomal formulation was incorporated in HPMC gel and characterized for drug content, ex vivo diffusion study through rat skin, and in vivo study and determination of pharmacokinetic parameters using HPLC technique. The results of size analysis showed that minimum size was 124.2 ± 16.77 nm with PDI values between 0.2 and 0.6. The zeta potential was from - 43.5 ± 3.0 to - 20.6 ± 1.42 mV. DEE ranged from 48 to 86%. The results of in vitro skin permeation showed that the amount FXT permeated ranged from 43.33 ± 5.3 to 82.14 ± 5.8%, flux ranged from 14.85 to 28.02. The results of ex vivo study showed that the amount of FXT permeated from unprocessed FXT gel was 49.42 ± 3.29% which was lesser than from FXT ethosomal gel. The results of in vivo study showed that Cmax and tmax were significantly different and higher for transdermal administration of FXT than oral administration. The developed FXT nanosized selected ethosome-based transdermal drug delivery gel system would provide a promising method for better management of gout.

Facilitating equitable prevention and management of gout for Maori in Northland, New Zealand, through a collaborative primary care approach.

INTRODUCTION The Gout Stop Programme was developed for primary care in Northland, New Zealand, to address inequitable health outcomes for Maori and Pacific people with gout. AIM The aim of the programme was to make it easier for clinicians to prescribe urate-lowering treatment, facilitate patient adherence through education and support, and reduce barriers to gout prevention and long-term management. METHODS From 2015 to 2017, patients with acute gout who met inclusion criteria were prescribed treatment according to a 'Gout Stop Pack' option, based on renal function and diabetes status. Patients were monitored by community pharmacists. Gout educators and a Gout Kaiawhina (community support worker) provided education and support to patients and whanau (families). Patient completion of the programme and outcomes, according to target serum urate level, were recorded. Patient experience was documented using a questionnaire and rating scale. RESULTS In total, 160 clinicians prescribed therapy at 887 patient presentations; 71% were Maori and Pacific patients. The completion rate was 55% in this group and 84% for the non-Maori and non-Pacific group. In the Maori and Pacific group, 40% reached the target serum urate level (≤0.36 mmol L-1) in 91 days, and 26% required further titration. In the non-Maori/non-Pacific group, these rates were 51% and 19% respectively. Following programme completion, 68% of Maori and Pacific patients and 65% of non-Maori and non-Pacific patients continued to take allopurinol. The 21 patients interviewed rated the programme as excellent or very good. DISCUSSION Culturally appropriate education and support for patients and the primary care team was essential. Collaboration between prescribers, community pharmacists and support workers reduced barriers to initiating prevention and long-term urate-lowering treatment and urate testing in this high-needs gout population.

The value of fixed rasburicase dosing versus weight-based dosing in the treatment and prevention of tumor lysis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Rasburicase is a recombinant urate oxidase enzyme used for the treatment and prevention of tumor lysis syndrome. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of indication-based, low-dose rasburicase administration compared to the Food and Drug Administration-approved weight-based dosing. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from a tertiary medical center including patients admitted from 2012 to 2016, who received at least one dose of rasburicase. The primary outcome was achieving a uric acid level less than 7.5 mg/dl after a single dose of rasburicase in the preprotocol (Food and Drug Administration-approved weight-based dosing) and postprotocol (indication-based, low-dose) groups. Secondary outcomes included the change in uric acid levels between the pre- and postprotocol groups, adherence to the new institutional protocol, need for repeat rasburicase doses, and a cost analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients received at least one dose of rasburicase between 1 January 2012 and 1 December 2016. Twenty-seven (79.4%) doses in the preprotocol group and 28 (82.4%) doses in the postprotocol group successfully achieved a uric acid level less than 7.5 mg/dl after a single dose of rasburicase (p=1.000). The average total monthly cost of rasburicase was reduced by 59.9% after adoption of the new protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Indication-based, low-dose rasburicase displayed significantly more value when compared to weight-based dosing as shown by achieving cost savings without compromising clinical efficacy.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, gout management is suboptimum, with only 40% of patients receiving urate-lowering therapy, usually without titration to achieve a target serum urate concentration. Nurses successfully manage many diseases in primary care. We compared nurse-led gout care to usual care led by general practitioners (GPs) for people in the community. METHODS: Research nurses were trained in best practice management of gout, including providing individualised information and engaging patients in shared decision making. Adults who had experienced a gout flare in the previous 12 months were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nurse-led care or continue with GP-led usual care. We assessed patients at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants who achieved serum urate concentrations less than 360 µmol/L (6 mg/dL) at 2 years. Secondary outcomes were flare frequency in year 2, presence of tophi, quality of life, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated based on intention to treat with multiple imputation. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01477346. FINDINGS: 517 patients were enrolled, of whom 255 were assigned nurse-led care and 262 usual care. Nurse-led care was associated with high uptake of and adherence to urate-lowering therapy. More patients receiving nurse-led care had serum urate concentrations less than 360 µmol/L at 2 years than those receiving usual care (95% vs 30%, RR 3·18, 95% CI 2·42-4·18, p<0·0001). At 2 years all secondary outcomes favoured the nurse-led group. The cost per QALY gained for the nurse-led intervention was £5066 at 2 years. INTERPRETATION: Nurse-led gout care is efficacious and cost-effective compared with usual care. Our findings illustrate the benefits of educating and engaging patients in gout management and reaffirm the importance of a treat-to-target urate-lowering treatment strategy to improve patient-centred outcomes. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK.

Comparison of fixed versus traditional weight-based dosing of rasburicase in a pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend rasburicase for the treatment of pediatric patients with hyperuricemia at risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) using a weight-based dose of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg once daily for 1-7 days. However, there has been a trend in practice due to recent data showing benefit using a fixed-dose approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety between fixed and weight-based dosing of rasburicase in a pediatric population. PROCEDURE: This was a retrospective chart review of 48 patients from January 1, 2007 to August 31, 2016 at Children's National Health System. Patients less than 18 years old with a documented diagnosis of a malignancy and baseline uric acid level were included; patients less than 30 kg at the time of rasburicase administration were excluded. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of this study was the treatment success of normalization of uric acid level (<5 mg/dl) within 24 hr of rasburicase administration. Eighty-three percent of patients had success with normalization of uric acid post rasburicase dose. Eighty-five percent of patients had success in the weight-based group compared to eighty-one percent in the fixed-dose group (P = 0.715). Mean percent reduction of uric acid at 24 hr was relatively similar between both groups (94% vs. 89%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a fixed-dose strategy of rasburicase is both safe and effective in reducing uric acid levels in the pediatric patient population. A fixed dose of rasburicase 6 mg is a cost-effective treatment option for TLS.

Design and Rationale for the Veterans Affairs "Cooperative Study Program 594 Comparative Effectiveness in Gout: Allopurinol vs. Febuxostat" Trial.

BACKGROUND: Gout patients do not routinely achieve optimal outcomes related in part to suboptimal administration of urate lowering therapy (ULT) including first-line xanthine oxidase inhibitors allopurinol or febuxostat. Studies leading to the approval of febuxostat compared this agent to allopurinol in inappropriately low, fixed doses. We will compare allopurinol with febuxostat in gout using appropriately titrated doses of both agents and a "treat-to-target" strategy congruent with specialty guidelines. METHODS: We have planned and initiated the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Study Program (CSP) 594, Comparative Effectiveness in Gout: Allopurinol vs Febuxostat study. This large double-blind, non-inferiority trial will enroll 950 gout patients randomized to receive allopurinol or febuxostat. Patients will be followed for a total of 72 weeks encompassing 3 distinct 24-week study phases. During Phase I (0-24 weeks), participants will undergo gradual dose titration of ULT until achievement of serum uric acid (sUA) <6.0 mg/dL or <5.0 mg/dL if tophi are present. Dose escalation will not be allowed during final three study visits of Phase 2 (24-48 weeks) and during Phase 3 (48-72 weeks). The primary study outcome is the proportion of participants experiencing at least one gout flare during Phase 3. Subsequent to the 72-week study, participants will be followed passively for up to 10 years after the study to assess long-term health outcomes. CONCLUSION: With its completion, the VA Comparative Effectiveness in Gout: Allopurinol vs Febuxostat study will demonstrate the central role of gradual ULT dose escalation and a treat-to-target strategy in gout management.

Comparative effectiveness of allopurinol versus febuxostat for preventing incident renal disease in older adults: an analysis of Medicare claims data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative effectiveness of allopurinol versus febuxostat for preventing incident renal disease in elderly. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study using 2006-2012 Medicare claims data, we included patients newly treated with allopurinol or febuxostat (baseline period of 183 days without either medication). We used 5:1 propensity-matched Cox regression analyses to compare the HR of incident renal disease with allopurinol use (and dose) versus febuxostat (reference). Sensitivity analyses included multivariable-adjusted regression models. RESULTS: There were 31 465 new allopurinol or febuxostat treatment episodes in 26 443 patients; 8570 ended in incident renal disease. Crude rates of incident renal disease per 1000 person-years were 192 with allopurinol versus 338 with febuxostat. Crude rates of incident renal disease per 1000 person-years were lower with higher daily dose: allopurinol <200, 200-299 and ≥300 mg/day with 238, 176 and 155; and febuxostat 40 and 80 mg/day with 341 and 326, respectively. In propensity-matched analyses, compared with febuxostat, allopurinol use was associated with lower HR of incident renal disease, 0.61 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.77). Compared with febuxostat 40 mg/day, allopurinol doses <200, 200-299 and ≥300 mg/day were associated with lower HR of incident renal disease, 0.75 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.86), 0.61 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.73) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.55), respectively. Sensitivity analyses using multivariable-adjusted regression confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol was associated with a lower risk of incident renal disease in elderly patients than febuxostat. Future studies need to examine the mechanism of this potential renal benefit of allopurinol.

A survey of the assessment and management of gout in general practitioners and medical officers within the Illawarra Network, Australia.

AIM: To review the assessment and management of gout by general practitioners (GPs) and medical officers (MOs) within the Illawarra Network, Australia. METHOD: A survey was sent to GPs and MOs within the Illawarra Network. RESULTS: Of 110 GPs, 45 responded. Of 129 MOs, 42 responded. The overall response was 32.6%. On analysis, 65.1% felt their knowledge of gout to be adequate and 61.6% thought they had been educated well. In acute assessment, 59.1% of GPs responded that the diagnosis of gout best be confirmed with a joint aspiration and 36.4% clinical suspicion. Differing, 85.7% of MOs chose a joint aspiration. In acute management, if colchicine were used, 59.1% of GPs would give 1 mg followed by 0.5 mg an hour later, then 0.5 mg twice daily, compared to 9.5% of MOs, while 20.5% of GPs would use 1 mg twice daily. Chronic management was answered poorly. After an acute attack, urate lowering therapy (ULT) would be started 14 days after by 47.7% of GPs, compared to 69.0% of MOs. GPs were more likely to start ULT within 7 days (52.3% vs. 31.0%). With dosing of ULT, 45.3% would treat to target, while 46.5% would dose to the creatinine clearance. Prophylactic therapy with ULT would be started by 81.8%, although only 17.4% would continue it for 3-6 months. CONCLUSION: There is poor adherence to recommended practice for dosing of colchicine in acute gout. Also in the management of chronic gout, in particular, the timing of starting ULT and the use of prophylaxis when initiating ULT.

Are allopurinol dose and duration of use nephroprotective in the elderly? A Medicare claims study of allopurinol use and incident renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of allopurinol dose/duration on the risk of renal failure in the elderly with allopurinol use. METHODS: We used the 5% random Medicare claims data from 2006 to 2012. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses assessed the association of allopurinol dose/duration with subsequent risk of developing incident renal failure or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (no prior diagnosis in last 183 days) in allopurinol users, controlling for age, sex, race and Charlson-Romano comorbidity index. HRs with 95% CIs were calculated. Sensitivity analyses considered a longer baseline period (365 days), controlled for gout or used more specific codes. RESULTS: Among the 30 022 allopurinol treatment episodes, 8314 incident renal failure episodes occurred. Compared with 1-199 mg/day, allopurinol dose of 200-299 mg/day (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87) and ≥300 mg/day, 0.71 (0.67 to 0.76), had significantly lower hazard of renal failure in multivariable-adjustment model, confirmed in multiple sensitivity analyses. Longer allopurinol use duration was significantly associated with lower hazards in sensitivity analyses (365-day look-back; reference, <0.5 year): 0.5-1 year, 1.00 (0.88, 1.15); >1-2 years, 0.85 (0.73 to 0.99); and >2 years, 0.81 (0.67 to 0.98). Allopurinol ≥300 mg/day was also associated with significantly lower risk of acute renal failure and ESRD with HR of 0.89 (0.83 to 0.94) and 0.57 (0.46 to 0.71), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher allopurinol dose is independently protective against incident renal failure in the elderly allopurinol users. A longer duration of allopurinol use may be associated with lower risk of incident renal failure. Potential mechanisms of these effects need to be examined.

Fixed, low-dose rasburicase for the treatment or prevention of hyperuricemia in adult oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Rasburicase is a recombinant urate oxidase enzyme administered to high risk patients or to those with preexisting hyperuricemia from tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). The objective of this retrospective review is to evaluate and characterize the use of fixed, low-dose rasburicase for the treatment of hyperuricemia in adult patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 1 October 2005 to 31 December 2011 was conducted in adult oncology patients who received fixed, low-dose rasburicase. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for the uric acid level change from baseline and the achievement of uric acid level less than 8 mg/dL. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in the analysis in which 26 (58%) patients received 3 mg rasburicase. For the 39 patients with baseline uric acid levels 8 mg/dL or higher, 80% achieved a uric acid level lower than 8 mg/dL with a single rasburicase dose. Six patients (13%) required renal replacement therapy despite rasburicase. The median uric acid level reduction 24 h post rasburicase dose 1.5 mg, 3 mg, 4.5 mg, and 6 mg were 5.5, 5.8, 3.8, and 10.05 mg/dL, respectively. There was no clinical difference between obese and non-obese patients in terms of their median uric acid reduction, 5.5 vs. 7 mg/dL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fixed, low dose rasburicase produced a consistent lowering of uric acid levels and may be utilized in the management of hyperuricemia in TLS. Further study is necessary to determine if a larger fixed dose would be required in those patients with a higher baseline uric acid level.

Cost-effectiveness of allopurinol and febuxostat for the management of gout.

BACKGROUND: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of urate-lowering treatment strategies for the management of gout. DESIGN: Markov model. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and expert opinion. TARGET POPULATION: Patients for whom allopurinol or febuxostat is a suitable initial urate-lowering treatment. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care payer. INTERVENTION: 5 urate-lowering treatment strategies were evaluated: no treatment; allopurinol- or febuxostat-only therapy; allopurinol-febuxostat sequential therapy; and febuxostat-allopurinol sequential therapy. Two dosing scenarios were investigated: fixed dose (80 mg of febuxostat daily, 0.80 success rate; 300 mg of allopurinol daily, 0.39 success rate) and dose escalation (≤120 mg of febuxostat daily, 0.82 success rate; ≤800 mg of allopurinol daily, 0.78 success rate). OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted costs, discounted quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: In both dosing scenarios, allopurinol-only therapy was cost-saving. Dose-escalation allopurinol-febuxostat sequential therapy was more costly but more effective than dose-escalation allopurinol therapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $39 400 per quality-adjusted life-year. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The relative rankings of treatments did not change. Our results were relatively sensitive to several potential variations of model assumptions; however, the cost-effectiveness ratios of dose escalation with allopurinol-febuxostat sequential therapy remained lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $109 000 per quality-adjusted life-year. LIMITATION: Long-term outcome data for patients with gout, including medication adherence, are limited. CONCLUSION: Allopurinol single therapy is cost-saving compared with no treatment. Dose-escalation allopurinol-febuxostat sequential therapy is cost-effective compared with accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Assessment of the association between colchicine therapy and serious adverse events.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: As data that prompted a 2009 labeling change detailing contraindications, precautions, and dosing recommendations for the first branded colchicine product were limited to case reports of myotoxicity and blood dyscrasias ascribed to the drug, we sought to quantify the association of colchicine therapy with serious adverse outcomes in a cohort of insured patients. DESIGN: Case-control study. DATA SOURCE: Kaiser Permanente Colorado electronic data warehouses and electronic medical records. PATIENTS: Cases were patients with a creatine kinase (CK) level of at least 2000 U/L or who developed a clinically significant non-cancer-related blood dyscrasia (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, aplastic anemia, or pancytopenia) between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2009 (954 cases). Each case was matched to up to 10 controls by age, sex, and index date (date of the increased CK level or blood dyscrasia-supporting laboratory value). Controls were patients without elevated CK levels or blood dyscrasias who had a routine health maintenance examination during the same time period (index date was the date of their health maintenance examination [9007 controls]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary study outcome was colchicine exposure, defined as a colchicine prescription purchase in the 100 days before the index date. The likelihood of colchicine exposure was examined with conditional logistic regression. Cases experienced a higher rate of previous colchicine exposure compared with controls (0.6% vs 0.2%, odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-10.7). In addition, cases had higher hospitalization rates (14.9% vs 5.0%, p<0.001), higher mean chronic disease scores (2.5 vs 0.0, p<0.001), and were more likely to have been exposed to drugs that may increase the risk of adverse events due to an interaction with a CYP3A4 inhibitor drug (6.9% vs 2.3%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with confirmed elevations in CK level and/or blood dyscrasias had a higher rate of previous colchicine exposure, although low overall, and greater hospitalization rates and exposure to drugs that may increase the risk of adverse events compared with controls. These findings support the 2009 United States Food and Drug Administration labeling for the first branded colchicine product, cautioning use in patients with liver impairment or renal dysfunction and/or those receiving concurrent drugs that may increase risk of adverse events.

Evaluation of health care costs and utilization patterns for patients with gout.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of gout has been increasing. Serum uric acid (sUA) levels ≥6 mg/dL have been associated with high morbidity and increased health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs and patterns of health care resource utilization for patients with gout, categorized into 3 cohorts based on sUA levels. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed laboratory, pharmacy, and medical service claims data (January 2005 to June 2010) for patients ≥18 years old. Inclusion criteria were at least 2 sUA levels and at least 1 primary gout diagnosis (International Classification of Disease-9th revision code 274.xx), and/or at least 1 prescription for gout-specific medications. Outcomes including costs, health care resource utilization, and medication adherence and persistence were assessed for the 1-year postindex period and summarized for the 3 cohorts based on sUA levels: <6 mg/dL, 6 to 8.99 mg/dL, and ≥9 mg/dL. Costs were adjusted based on preindex utilization and baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria: cohort 1 (sUA <6 mg/dL), n = 38, mean age 59 years; cohort 2 (sUA 6-8.99 mg/dL), n = 231, mean age 61 years; and cohort 3 (sUA ≥9 mg/dL), n = 83, mean age 62 years. Mean adjusted gout-related health care costs were $332, $353, and $663, respectively (P <0.05); mean adjusted all-cause health care costs were $11,365, $11,551, and $14,474, respectively, for the 3 cohorts (P <0.05). sUA levels were positively associated with the percent of patients who had at least 1 hospitalization and the mean number of hospitalizations and emergency department visits (P < 0.05). Significantly more patients with sUA <6 mg/dL achieved adherence rates of ≥80% and had a longer mean duration of continuous treatment compared with patients with sUA between 6 and 8.99 mg/dL or ≥9.0 mg/dL (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high levels of sUA had higher gout-related and all-cause health care costs, more all-cause hospitalizations, and emergency department visits, but they also exhibited poorer adherence and persistence.

Pegloticase: a novel agent for treatment-refractory gout.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of pegloticase, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in September 2010 for treatment of patients with chronic treatment-refractory gout. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed (1948-January 2012), TOXLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2012), and Google Scholar using the terms pegloticase, puricase, PEG-uricase, gout, uricase, and Krystexxa. Results were limited to English-language publications. References from selected articles were reviewed to identify additional citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies evaluating the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic treatment-refractory gout were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pegloticase represents a novel intravenous treatment option for patients who have chronic gout refractory to other available treatments. Pegloticase is a recombinant uricase and achieves therapeutic effects by catalyzing oxidation of uric acid to allantoin, resulting in decreased uric acid concentrations. Results of published trials demonstrate the ability of pegloticase to maintain uric acid concentrations below 7 mg/dL in patients with chronic gout. Data supporting reduction of gout flares are limited. Pegloticase is well tolerated but associated with gout flares and infusion reactions. Other adverse events include nausea, dizziness, and back pain. During Phase 3 trials, 2 patients in the pegloticase biweekly group and 1 in the monthly group experienced heart failure exacerbation; another patient in the monthly group experienced a nonfatal myocardial infarction. Providers should exercise caution before administering pegloticase to patients with cardiovascular disease. The cost burden and safety profile may limit its use in practice, in addition to limited data available to support decreases in patient-centered outcomes (eg, gouty attacks). CONCLUSIONS: Pegloticase is an effective option for patients with symptomatic gout for whom current uric acid-lowering therapies are ineffective or contraindicated.