Internet Tool to Support Self-Assessment and Self-Swabbing of Sore Throat: Development and Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common problem and a common reason for the overuse of antibiotics. A web-based tool that helps people assess their sore throat, through the use of clinical prediction rules, taking throat swabs or saliva samples, and taking throat photographs, has the potential to improve self-management and help identify those who are the most and least likely to benefit from antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a web-based tool to help patients and parents or carers self-assess sore throat symptoms and take throat photographs, swabs, and saliva samples for diagnostic testing. We then explored the acceptability and feasibility of using the tool in adults and children with sore throats. METHODS: We used the Person-Based Approach to develop a web-based tool and then recruited adults and children with sore throats who participated in this study by attending general practices or through social media advertising. Participants self-assessed the presence of FeverPAIN and Centor score criteria and attempted to photograph their throat and take throat swabs and saliva tests. Study processes were observed via video call, and participants were interviewed about their views on using the web-based tool. Self-assessed throat inflammation and pus were compared to clinician evaluation of patients' throat photographs. RESULTS: A total of 45 participants (33 adults and 12 children) were recruited. Of these, 35 (78%) and 32 (71%) participants completed all scoring elements for FeverPAIN and Centor scores, respectively, and most (30/45, 67%) of them reported finding self-assessment relatively easy. No valid response was provided for swollen lymph nodes, throat inflammation, and pus on the throat by 11 (24%), 9 (20%), and 13 (29%) participants respectively. A total of 18 (40%) participants provided a throat photograph of adequate quality for clinical assessment. Patient assessment of inflammation had a sensitivity of 100% (3/3) and specificity of 47% (7/15) compared with the clinician-assessed photographs. For pus on the throat, the sensitivity was 100% (3/3) and the specificity was 71% (10/14). A total of 89% (40/45), 93% (42/45), 89% (40/45), and 80% (30/45) of participants provided analyzable bacterial swabs, viral swabs, saliva sponges, and saliva drool samples, respectively. Participants were generally happy and confident in providing samples, with saliva samples rated as slightly more acceptable than swab samples. CONCLUSIONS: Most adult and parent participants were able to use a web-based intervention to assess the clinical features of throat infections and generate scores using clinical prediction rules. However, some had difficulties assessing clinical signs, such as lymph nodes, throat pus, and inflammation, and scores were assessed as sensitive but not specific. Many participants had problems taking photographs of adequate quality, but most were able to take throat swabs and saliva samples.

[Efficacy assessment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus tobramycin 0.3% on clinical signs of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis]. / Evaluation de l'efficacité d'un collyre azithromycine 1,5% versus tobramycine 0,3% sur les signes cliniques de la conjonctivite bactérienne purulente.

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial conjunctivitis is characterized by hyperemia and discharge of one or both eyes. These clinical signs appear quickly and are contagious. This study compares the clinical efficacy (signs and symptoms) and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops with tobramycin 0.3%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked study including 1,043 patients with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. Patients received either azithromycin twice daily for 3 days or tobramycin, 1 drop every 2 hours for 2 days, then four times daily for 5 days. The primary variable was clinical cure at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (D9) on the worst eye. The cure was defined as bulbar conjunctival injection and discharge scores of 0. Clinical signs were evaluated at D0, D3, and D9. RESULTS: In the azithromycin group 87.8% of patients and in the tobramycin group 89.4% were clinically cured at D9. Clinical cure with azithromycin was not inferior to tobramycin at D9: discharge was absent in 96.3% of patients treated with azithromycin and 95.1% with tobramycin. Azithromycin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin 1.5% for 3 days (six drops) was as effective as tobramycin for 7 days (36 drops). Furthermore, patients on azithromycin presented earlier clinical cure on Day 3 than patients on tobramycin. Azyter, with its convenient dosing (bid for 3 days), is a step forward in the management of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis.

Treatment of pediatric suppurative mastoiditis: is peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) antibiotic therapy necessary?

OBJECTIVE: A review of the treatment of pediatric acute mastoiditis requiring surgical intervention managed with and without PICC therapy postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study of 42 cases from 1989 to 2004 treated at a regional children's hospital. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received postoperative PICC therapy and 26 received a course of oral antibiotics. The PICC group received on average 12.12 days of intravenous antibiotics compared to only 3.53 days for the non-PICC group (P < 0.001). No differences were observed between the two groups in treatment outcomes. One patient from each group required rehospitalization. One minor complication was experienced in a patient in the PICC group. There were no surgical complications. The total cost for outpatient PICC therapy increased treatment costs by approximately $1500 to $2500. CONCLUSIONS: Oral antibiotic therapy is sufficient after surgical intervention for acute pediatric suppurative mastoiditis without intracranial complications and does not result in adverse treatment outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: Use of PICC therapy after surgical intervention for mastoiditis should be limited. EBM RATING: B-3b.

[Comparison of efficacy between ceftriaxone and cefoperazone plus sulbactam in peri-operative treatment of acute suppurative cholangitis].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ceftriaxone and that of cefoperazone plus sulbactam (sulperazon) in controlling infection, in scavenging bacteria from bile, and in their costs when treating acute suppurative cholangitis with choledochostomy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the ceftriaxone group (R-group, n=95) and sulperazon group (S-group, n=95). Before choledochostomy, both groups received one intravenous dose of the corresponding antibiotics: and 2 g ceftriaxnoe for the R-group, 2 g sulperazon, containing 1 g cefoperazone and 1 g sulbactam, for the S-group. After the operation, the patients in the R-group received ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. q.d.; the patients in the S-group received sulperazon 2 g i.v. b.i.d.. In addition, all patients in both groups received metronidazole 0.5 g daily before and after the operation. The efficacy was evaluated by efficiency in controlling infection and the persisting days of symptoms due to infection, fever and leukocytosis; the persisting days was compared using the life table method to calculate the "cumulative probability of persistence of symptoms (CPPS)". The two groups were also compared in regards to their biliary bacterial clearance rates and the costs directly attributable to the antibiotics. RESULTS: The efficiency in controlling infection was 98.9% (94/95) in both groups. However, the CPPS of the R-group decreased more rapidly than that of the S-group, Log-Rankchi2=6.7901, P=0.0092. Biliary bacterial clearance rate on post-operative day 3 was 72.0% (36/50) for the R-group, 41.3% (19/46) for the S-group, P=0.0037. Cost directly attributable to the antibiotics were (1788.29 +/- 518.46) yuan (RMB) for the R-group, and (3768.74 +/- 820.55) yuan for the S-group, F=395.51, P=0.0000. CONCLUSION: Both ceftriaxone and sulperazon are effective in treating acute suppurative cholangitis when used before and after choledochostomy. Ceftriaxone is superior in expediting symptom relief and bacterial clearance from bile, and is more cost-effective.

[Comparative clinical-economic analysis of antibiotic therapy in pyogenic inflammatory diseases of the lower extremities]. / Sravnitel'nyi kliniko-ékonomicheskii analiz programm antibiotikoterapii gnoino-vospalitel'nykh zabolevanii nizhnikh konechnostei.

A randomized comparative investigation was carried out in two equal groups of patients with pyo-inflammatory diseases of lower extremities (the total number 50 patients) in order to study effectiveness and tolerance to Netilmycin (1st group) and Gentamycin (2nd group) given in combination with Cefasolin. Clinical symptoms were estimated immediately after operation, in 3, 6 and 10-12 days after it. Bacteriological investigations were fulfilled immediately after operation, in 72 h and in 6-10 days after the beginning of antibacterial therapy. Clinical and biochemical investigations of blood were fulfilled before and in 10 days after the beginning of the treatment. Effectiveness of the treatment in the first group was 100%, in the second group--80%. In the second group the antibiotics were changed in 20% of cases and the average duration of hospitalization among the patients of this group was reliably longer that in the first group. The eradication rating of Netilmycin was higher than that of Gentamycin (25 strains from 25 and 20 from 25 respectively). Gentamycin had a pronounced nephrotoxic effect (elevation of the level of creatinin and urea of blood in dynamics by 21% and 32%), as compared with Netilmycin (9% and 3%). Total expenses to antibiotic therapy in the first group made up 97,650 rub, and in the second group 106,245 rub. Netilmycin in combination with Cefasolin was more effective for acute pyo-inflammatory diseases of lower extremities than a combination of Gentamycin with Cefasolin, it more rapidly resulted in reduction of clinical signs of inflammation, was better endured and more economical.

[Theoretically probable assessment of the effectiveness of individualized combined antibiotic therapy of patients with suppurative inflammatory processes]. / Teoretiko-veroiatnostnaia otsenka éffektivnosti individualizovannoi kombinirovannoi antibiotikoterapii bol'nykh s gnoino-vospalitel'nymi protsessami

Efficiency of individual combined antibiotic therapy of patients was estimated in comparison to the use of single antibiotics of their fixed combinations without any special control group. Since the essence of the study was practically in successive appliance of the 2 methods of therapy to the same group of the patients, it was possible to carry out theoretically probable estimation of the final result as a summation effect of both methods and to define the probable result of the 2 nd method. The study of the results of the treatment of the patients with purulent-inflammatory processes showed significant advantages of the individual combined antibiotic therapy.