In Vitro Assessment of Combinations of Enterovirus Inhibitors against Enterovirus 71.

Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) is a major causative pathogen of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) epidemics. No antiviral therapies are currently available for treating EV-A71 infections. Here, we selected five reported enterovirus inhibitors (suramin, itraconazole [ITZ], GW5074, rupintrivir, and favipiravir) with different mechanisms of action to test their abilities to inhibit EV-A71 replication alone and in combination. All selected compounds have anti-EV-A71 activities in cell culture. The combination of rupintrivir and ITZ or favipiravir was synergistic, while the combination of rupintrivir and suramin was additive. The combination of suramin and favipiravir exerted a strong synergistic antiviral effect. The observed synergy was not due to cytotoxicity, as there was no significant increase in cytotoxicity when compounds were used in combinations at the tested doses. To investigate the potential inhibitory mechanism of favipiravir against enterovirus, two favipiravir-resistant EV-A71 variants were independently selected, and both of them carried an S121N mutation in the finger subdomain of the 3D polymerase. Reverse engineering of this 3D S121N mutation into an infectious clone of EV-A71 confirmed the resistant phenotype. Moreover, viruses resistant to ITZ or favipiravir remained susceptible to other inhibitors. Most notably, combined with ITZ, rupintrivir prevented the development of ITZ-resistant variants. Taken together, these results provide a rational basis for the design of combination regimens for use in the treatment of EV-A71 infections.

Assessment and characterization of purinergic contractions and relaxations in the rat urinary bladder.

The aim of the present study was to assess the purinoceptor functional responses of the urinary bladder by using isolated rat urinary bladder strip preparations. ATP elicited a transient bladder contraction followed by a sustained relaxation and ADP, UDP and UTP generated predominantly potent relaxations (relaxatory potencies: ADP = ATP > UDP = UTP). The ATP contractions were desensitized with the P2X(1/3) purinoceptor agonist/desensitizer alpha,beta-meATP and reduced by the P2 purinoceptor antagonist PPADS but unaffected by the P2 purinoceptor antagonist suramin. Electrical field stimulation (1-60 Hz) evoked frequency-dependent bladder contractions that were decreased by incubation with alpha,beta-meATP but not further decreased by PPADS. Suramin antagonized relaxations generated by UDP but not those by ADP, ATP or UTP. PPADS antagonized and tended to antagonize UTP and UDP relaxations, respectively, but did neither affect ADP nor ATP relaxations. ADP relaxations were insensitive to the P2Y(1) purinoceptor antagonist MRS 2179 and the ATP-sensitive potassium channel antagonist glibenclamide. The ATP relaxations were inhibited by the P1 purinoceptor antagonist 8-p-sulfophenyltheophylline but unaffected by the A2A adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine and glibenclamide. Adenosine evoked relaxations that were antagonized by the A2B adenosine receptor antagonist PSB 1115. Thus, in the rat urinary bladder purinergic contractions are elicited predominantly by stimulation of the P2X(1) purinoceptors, while UDP/UTP-sensitive P2Y purinoceptor(s) and P1 purinoceptors of the A2B adenosine receptor subtype are involved in bladder relaxation.