Single Intravenous Dose Dalbavancin Pathway for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Considerations for Emergency Department Implementation and Cost Savings.

BACKGROUND: A pathway for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) with a single intravenous (IV) dose of dalbavancin was previously shown to reduce hospital admissions and shorten inpatient length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVES: To describe pathway implementation at the emergency department (ED) and evaluate cost-effectiveness of a single-dose dalbavancin administered to ED patients who would otherwise be hospitalized to receive usual care with multidose IV antibiotics. METHODS: The dalbavancin pathway was previously implemented at 11 U.S. EDs (doi:10.1111/acem.14258). Patients with ABSSSI, without an unstable comorbidity or infection complication requiring complex management, were treated with a single dose of dalbavancin. At the emergency physicians' discretion, patients were either discharged and received outpatient follow-up or were hospitalized for continued management. A decision analytic cost-effectiveness model was developed from the U.S. healthcare's perspective to evaluate costs associated with the dalbavancin pathway compared with inpatient usual care. Costs (2021 USD) were modeled over a 14-day horizon and included ED visits, drug costs, inpatient stay, and physician visits. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses examined input parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Driven largely by the per diem inpatient cost and LOS for usual care, the dalbavancin pathway was associated with savings of $5133.20 per patient and $1211.57 per hospitalization day avoided, compared with inpatient usual care. The results remained robust in sensitivity and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: The new single-dose dalbavancin ED pathway for ABSSSI treatment, which was previously implemented at 11 U.S. EDs, offers robust cost savings compared to inpatient usual care.

Impact of first-line dalbavancin for cellulitis on hospital admissions and costs: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with cellulitis are treated with oral antibiotics as outpatients, but some require hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board in Wales approved use of dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic from April to December 2020 to facilitate early discharge and prevent hospital admission. OBJECTIVES: To report cost savings and admission avoidance through first-line intravenous use of dalbavancin for cellulitis in one health board in Wales. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cellulitis who presented to the emergency department or medical assessment unit at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board's two hospitals between April and December 2020 were identified for treatment with dalbavancin, because they had not responded to oral antibiotics or their initial presentation warranted intravenous antibiotics. Patients received 1500 mg dalbavancin by intravenous infusion according to prescribing information and were sent home without being admitted. Outcomes were admission within 30 d of dalbavancin and cost savings from avoiding admission. RESULTS: 31 patients were treated with dalbavancin for cellulitis in the emergency department or medical assessment unit. No patient was admitted within 30 d of receiving dalbavancin. Use of dalbavancin is estimated to have saved 248 bed-days over the study period, with an estimated saving of $120,444.23 based on avoidance of admission. The cost of dalbavancin for these 31 patients was $69,959.08, giving an overall cost saving of $50,485.15 ($1529.95 per patient). CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic for cellulitis prevents admission, saving bed-days and admission-related costs.

Cost evaluation of continuation of therapy with dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care antibiotics alone in hospitalized persons who inject drugs with severe gram-positive infections.

PURPOSE: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for severe gram-positive infections and may require prolonged hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Dalbavancin (DBV) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide that may reduce costs and provide effective treatment in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of PWID with severe gram-positive infections. Patients admitted from January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2019 (standard-of-care [SOC] group) and from November 15, 2019, to March 31, 2022 (DBV group) were included. The primary outcome was the total cost to the healthcare system. Secondary outcomes included hospital days saved and treatment failure. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included (37 in the DBV group and 50 in the SOC group). Patients were a median of 34 years old and were predominantly Caucasian (82%). Staphylococcus aureus (82%) was the most common organism, and bacteremia (71%) was the most common type of infection. Compared to the SOC group, the DBV group would have had a median of 14 additional days of hospitalization if they had stayed to complete their therapy (P = 0.014). The median total cost to the healthcare system was significantly lower in the DBV group than in the SOC group ($31,698.00 vs $45,093.50; P = 0.035). The rate of treatment failure was similar between the groups (32.4% in the DBV group vs 36% in the SOC group; P = 0.729). CONCLUSION: DBV is a cost-saving alternative to SOC IV antibiotics for severe gram-positive infections in PWID, with similar treatment outcomes. Larger prospective studies, including other patient populations, may demonstrate additional benefit.

Comparison of dalbavancin with standard of care in the management of infective endocarditis: efficacy, safety, and cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Due to its long half-life, dalbavancin offers benefits for long-duration treatments, especially osteoarticular and infective endocarditis (IE). We evaluated the efficacy and costs of IE treatment, comparing dalbavancin with standard of care (SOC). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients with Gram-positive cocci definite IE. Dalbavancin was used as a sequential therapy before discharge. Efficacy was a combined variable of clinical cure and absence of recurrence in 12-month follow-up. Length of hospital stay and the associated costs were analyzed in both groups of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received dalbavancin and 47 SOC. The efficacy was similar between the groups (dalbavancin 18 [72%] vs SOC 44 [94%], P = 0.198). Hospital stay was shorter in the dalbavancin group (dalbavancin 22 days [16-34] vs SOC 37 days [23-49], P = 0.001), especially in those with E. faecalis IE (dalbavancin 30 days [20-36] vs SOC 65 days [46-74], P <0.001). A reduction of cost was observed between both groups (dalbavancin, 12,206 € [8998-17,283] vs SOC 16,249 € [11,496-22,367], P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin could be a safe and effective option in the sequential treatment of patients with IE. Also, a cost reduction was detected, due to a significant shortness of hospital stay.

Population pharmacokinetics and model-based dosing optimization of teicoplanin in elderly critically ill patients with pneumonia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of teicoplanin in elderly critically ill patients with pneumonia for optimal dosages. METHODS: Fifteen critically ill patients (9 men) ≥ 60 years received teicoplanin 6 mg/kg for three doses followed by standard maintenance doses (6 mg/kg q24h) with renal dosing adjustment. Serial plasma samples from all patients were analyzed simultaneously by population pharmacokinetic modeling using NONMEM. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated through Monte Carlo simulations for various dosing regimens to achieve adequate systemic exposures. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range, IQR) age, body mass index, and creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 75 (64-78) years, 22.5 (20.8-25.4) kg/m2, and 64 (47-106) mL/min, respectively. The median (IQR) peak and trough concentration was 46.5 (42.7-51.0) and 8.7 (7.2-9.5) mg/L. The population pharmacokinetic model showed slower clearance (CL) and larger peripheral volume of distribution (V2) in patients with reduced CrCl: CL (L/h) = 0.629 × (CrCl/64)0.656, V2 (L) = 55.7 × (CrCl/64)-0.665. Model-based simulations showed PTAs ≥85% only for higher-dose regimens (12 mg/kg) up to an MIC of 0.5 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Standard teicoplanin dosages for pneumonia may provide inadequate systemic exposures in elderly critically ill patients. High-dose regimens should be considered as empiric therapy or for less susceptible pathogens.

Cost analysis of disease including treatment with dalbavancin in a Spanish hospital: ECODAL ANALYSIS.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic with activity against gram-positive bacteria that allows early discharge of patients requiring intravenous therapy. Outpatient treatment helps offset hospitalisation costs associated with standard intravenous treatment. Our objective was to assess the cost of disease management, including treatment with dalbavancin, in a Spanish hospital for 1 year, and the hypothetical costs associated with treatment with other therapeutic alternatives to dalbavancin. METHODS: A single-centre, observational, retrospective post-hoc analysis was conducted based on electronic medical records analysing all patients who received dalbavancin treatment throughout 1 year; cost analysis was performed for the whole process. In addition, three scenarios designed on the basis of real clinical practice by clinical experts were hypothesised: (i) individual therapeutic alternative to dalbavancin, (ii) all patients treated with daptomycin, and (iii) all days of dalbavancin as outpatient treatment transformed into hospital stay. Costs were obtained from the hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated with dalbavancin; their mean age was 57.9 years, and 70.6% were men. The main reasons for dalbavancin use were outpatient management (61.7%, n = 21) and ensuring treatment adherence (26.5%, n = 9). The main indications were: osteoarticular infection (32.4%) and infective endocarditis (29.4%). One-half (50%) of the infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus (23.5% were methicillin resistant). All patients achieved clinical resolution, and no costs associated with dalbavancin-associated adverse events or re-admissions were reported. The mean total cost of treatment was 22,738€ per patient, with the greatest expenditures in interventions (8,413€) and hospital stay (6,885€). The mean cost of dalbavancin treatment was 3,936€; without dalbavancin, this cost could have been increased to 3,324-11,038€ depending on the scenario, mainly due to hospital stays. MAIN LIMITATION: Limited sample size obtained from a single centre. CONCLUSION: The economic impact of the management of these infections is high. The cost of dalbavancin is offset by the decreased length of stay.

A retrospective multicentre study on dalbavancin effectiveness and cost-evaluation in sternotomic wound infection treatment: DALBA SWIT Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dalbavancin compared with standard of care (SoC) treatment as daptomycin or teicoplanin in patients with sternal wound infections (SWI). METHODS: Multicentre retrospective study of patients diagnosed with SWI from January 2016 to December 2019 at two cardiac surgery facilities treated with dalbavancin, teicoplanin or daptomycin. Patients with SWI treated with dalbavancin were compared with SoC to evaluate resolution of infection at 90 and 180 days from infection diagnosis, length of stay (LoS) and management costs. RESULTS: 48 patients with SWI were enrolled, 25 (50%) male, median age 67 (60-73) years, Charlson index score 5 (4-7). Fifteen patients were treated with dalbavancin (31%) and 33 with SoC (69%): teicoplanin in 21 (63%), and daptomycin in 12 (37%). Staphylococcus species were the most frequent isolates (44, 92%), mostly (84%) resistant to methicillin. All patients were treated with surgical debridement followed by negative pressure wound therapy. Wound healing at day 90 and 180 was achieved in 46 (95.8%) and 34 (82.9%) of patients, respectively. A shorter length of hospitalization in patients treated with dalbavancin compared with SoC [12 (7-18) days vs 22 (12-36) days, p:0.009] was found. Treatment with dalbavancin resulted in total cost savings of €16 026 (95% CI 5976-26 076, P < 0.001). Savings were mainly related to the LoS that was significantly shorter in the dalbavancin group, generating significantly lower cost compared to SoC group. CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin treatment of sternal wound infections is effective and seems to reduce hospitalization length, leading to significantly lower costs.

Cost-minimisation analysis of oritavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections from a United Kingdom perspective.

BACKGROUND: Early discharge (ED) from hospital and outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) are effective approaches for the management of a range of infections, including acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Strategies that facilitate ED, thereby reducing complications such as healthcare-acquired infection whilst enhancing patient quality of life, are being increasingly adopted in line with good antimicrobial stewardship practice. This study presents a cost-minimisation analysis for the use of oritavancin at ED versus relevant comparators from a National Health Service (NHS) and personal and social services United Kingdom perspective. METHODS: A cost-minimisation model considering adult patients with ABSSSI with suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, was developed based on publicly available NHS costs, practice guidelines for ABSSSI and clinical expert's opinion. Cost of treatment and treatment days were compared for oritavancin at ED to dalbavancin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid. RESULTS: Following the empiric use of either flucloxacillin or vancomycin in the inpatient setting, oritavancin was compared to OPAT with dalbavancin, teicoplanin and daptomycin, and oral linezolid from day 4 of treatment. Oritavancin at ED reduced treatment duration by 0.8 days and led to cost savings of £281 in comparison to dalbavancin. In comparison to teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid, oritavancin reduced treatment duration by 5 days, with marginally higher costs (£446, £137, and £1,434, respectively). CONCLUSION: Oritavancin, used to support ED, is associated with lower costs compared with dalbavancin and reduced treatment duration relative to all comparators. Its use would support an ED approach in MRSA ABSSSI management.

Optimal Teicoplanin Dosing Regimen in Neonates and Children Developed by Leveraging Real-World Clinical Information.

BACKGROUND: Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic used for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. To ensure successful target attainment, therapeutic drug monitoring-informed dosage adjustment is recommended. However, it relies on the experience of the clinician and the frequency of drug measurements. This study aimed to design a new optimal dosing regimen of teicoplanin with a maintenance dosing strategy for neonates and children based on their physiological characteristics. METHODS: Data from teicoplanin-treated patients (n = 214) were collected from electronic medical records. Covariate analyses were performed using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling with 399 serum teicoplanin concentrations from 48 neonates and 166 children. Multiple PK simulations were conducted to explore optimal dosing regimens that would allow control of the trough concentration to the target of 15-30 mg/L quicker than the current standard regimen. RESULTS: Allometrically scaled body weight, postmenstrual age (PMA), renal function, and serum albumin were implemented as substantial covariates for teicoplanin clearance in a two-compartment PK model. Covariate analyses and comprehensive simulation assessments recommended the following modifications to the current regimen: (1) decreased dose for premature babies (PMA ≤28 weeks), (2) decreased dose for children with renal dysfunction, and (3) increased dose for children (0.5-11 years) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS: This study leverages real-world clinical information and proposes new optimal dosing regimens for teicoplanin in neonates and children through PK modeling and simulation analyses, taking into account the age, including PMA, and renal function of patients.

Effectiveness, safety and cost analysis of dalbavancin in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. However, there is growing evidence that other gram-positive infections could be treated with this antibiotic. A study was undertaken in a tertiary hospital in Spain to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in off-label indications and the potential healthcare cost savings. METHODS: A retrospective observational study including all patients treated with dalbavancin in our hospital from October 2016 to August 2019 was carried out. Demographic, clinical and safety variables were collected. Effectiveness was assessed using the clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection and the absence of hospital admissions due to the same infection in the following 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (69.9% men, n=71; median age 72.5 years (range 56.0-84.0)). Treatment was off label in 71 cases (69.6%). The most frequent off-label indications were catheter-related bacteraemia (15.7%, n=16) and endocarditis (13.6%, n=14). All patients had previously received antibiotics. The main reason for switching to dalbavancin was patient discharge (79.4%, n=81). Dalbavancin was administered during hospitalisation in 66.7% of the patients and in the outpatient setting in 13.7%. The median reduction in length of hospital stay was 14 days per patient. A saving of about 4550 Euros per patient was estimated. 89 patients (93.7%) had clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection at the end of the study. One patient did not finish the dalbavancin infusion due to an allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that dalbavancin is a safe and effective alternative to the off-label treatment of gram-positive infections. Its dosage facilitates early discharge and outpatient management of these patients.

Optimization of dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neutropenic patients with cancer by Monte Carlo simulations.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in neutropenic patients with cancer. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to determine cumulative fraction of response (CFRs) in terms of area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibition concentration target. Currently clinical standard dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin were insufficient to provide expected CFRs against MRSA for neutropenic patients with cancer. The high dosing regimens of vancomycin (3500 mg/d), teicoplanin (800 mg/d) and daptomycin (8 mg/kg/d) could provide CFRs of ≥ 80%, showing a higher treatment success. However, the majority of CFRs with linezolid simulated dosing regimens reached < 80% against MRSA. Therefore, a strategy of high dosages of vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin may be needed to attain optimal therapeutic efficacy against MRSA in neutropenic patients with cancer.

Dalbavancin Efficacy and Impact on Hospital Length-of-Stay and Treatment Costs in Different Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of dalbavancin therapy on both hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and treatment-related costs, as well as to describe the clinical outcome, in a retrospective cohort of patients with diverse Gram-positive bacterial infections, hospitalized in different specialty Units. METHODS: From July 2017 to July 2019, clinical and sociodemographic data were collected for all hospitalized patients switched to dalbavancin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. LOS and treatment-related costs were assessed and compared to a hypothetical scenario where the initial standard antimicrobial therapy would have been administered in hospital for the same duration as dalbavancin. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled. The observed infections were: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs, 12 patients), complicated ABSSSIs (eight patients), osteoarticular infections (18 patients), vascular graft or cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections (12 patients). After a median of 14 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-28] days, the in-hospital antimicrobial therapy was switched to dalbavancin 1500 mg. When appropriate, considering the site and the clinical course of the infection, 1500 mg doses were repeated every 14 days until recovery. Overall, 49/50 (98%) patients reported clinical success at the end of therapy. No relapses were observed in 37 patients for whom a median follow-up of 150 (IQR 30-180) days was available. By switching to dalbavancin, a median of €8,259 (IQR 5644-17,270) and 14 hospital days (IQR 22-47) per patient were saved. CONCLUSIONS: In this experience, the use of dalbavancin contributed to shorten LOS and treatment-related costs, especially in difficult Gram-positive infections requiring prolonged therapy.

Teicoplanin physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling offers a quantitative assessment of a theoretical influence of serum albumin and renal function on its disposition.

PURPOSE: Variability in teicoplanin pharmacokinetics has been explained by multiple factors such as body weight, renal function, and serum albumin level. To improve mechanistic understanding of the causes of variability, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model can be used as a systematic platform. In this study, a PBPK model of teicoplanin was developed to quantitatively assess the effects of physiological changes due to disease status using virtual populations. METHODS: Predictive performance of the models was evaluated by comparing simulated and observed concentration-time profiles of teicoplanin. Subsequently, sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential factors contributing to individual differences in teicoplanin PK. RESULTS: The developed PBPK model generated concentration-time profiles that were comparable to clinical observations in healthy adults, including Caucasians and Japanese, and after single-dose and multiple-dose administration. The predicted PK parameters (i.e., Cmax, AUC, clearance) were within a two-fold range of the observed data in patients with renal impairments as well as healthy adults. Changes in total and unbound teicoplanin concentrations at 72 h, after various dosing regimens (tested 4-14 mg/kg q12h for three doses as a loading dose and then 4-14 mg/kg daily as a maintenance dose), were sensitive to renal function and serum albumin concentrations. CONCLUSION: The PBPK model of teicoplanin provides mechanistic insight into the factors altering its disposition and allows assessments of the theoretical and quantitative impact of individual changes in physiological parameters on its PK even when an actual assessment with adequate sample sizes of patients is challenging.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound and Total Teicoplanin in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Teicoplanin is a highly protein-bound antibiotic, increasingly used to treat serious Gram-positive infections in critically ill children. Maturational and pathophysiological intensive care unit-related changes often lead to altered pharmacokinetics. In this study, the objectives were to develop a pediatric population-pharmacokinetic model of unbound and total teicoplanin concentrations, to investigate the impact of plasma albumin levels and renal function on teicoplanin pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the efficacy of the current weight-based dosing regimen. METHODS: An observational pharmacokinetic study was performed and blood samples were collected for quantification of unbound and total concentrations of teicoplanin after the first dose and in assumed steady-state conditions. A population-pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a standard sequential approach and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for a probability of target attainment analysis using previously published pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with allometric scaling of pharmacokinetic parameters and non-linear plasma protein binding best described the data. Neither the inclusion of albumin nor the renal function significantly improved the model and no other covariates were supported for inclusion in the final model. The probability of target attainment analysis showed that the standard dosing regimen does not satisfactory attain the majority of the proposed targets. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully characterized the pharmacokinetics of unbound and total teicoplanin in critically ill pediatric patients. The highly variable unbound fraction of teicoplanin could not be predicted using albumin levels, which may support the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound concentrations. Poor target attainment was shown for the most commonly used dosing regimen, regardless of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target evaluated.

Cost-Consequence Analysis of Single-Dose Dalbavancin Versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in a Multisite Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are common infectious diseases that cause a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of dalbavancin vs standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of ABSSSI in a community-based healthcare system. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients with ABSSSI treated with dalbavancin or SoC during a 27-month period. Patients were matched based on age and body mass index. The primary outcome was average net cost of care to the healthcare system per patient, calculated as the difference between reimbursement payments and the total cost to provide care to the patient. The secondary outcome was proportion of cases successfully treated, defined as no ABSSSI-related readmission within 30 days after the initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 418 matched patients, 209 received SoC and 209 received dalbavancin. The average total cost of care per patient was greater with dalbavancin vs SoC ($4770 vs $2709, P < .0001). The average reimbursement per patient was $3084 with dalbavancin vs $2633 SoC (P = .527). The net cost, calculated as revenue minus total cost, was $1685 with dalbavancin vs $75 with SoC (P = .013). The overall treatment success rate was 74% with dalbavancin vs 85% with SoC (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin was more costly than SoC for the treatment of ABSSSI, with a higher 30-day readmission rate. Dalbavancin does not offer an economic or efficacy advantage.

Possible treatment and strategies for COVID-19: review and assessment.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is declared as an international emergency in 2020. Its prevalence and fatality rate are rapidly increasing but the medication options are still limited for this perilous disease. The emergent outbreak of COVID-19 triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) keeps propagating globally. The present scenario has emphasized the requirement for therapeutic opportunities to relive and overcome this latest pandemic. Despite the fact, the deteriorating developments of COVID-19, there is no drug certified to have considerable effects in the medical treatment for COVID-19 patients. The COVID-19 pandemic requests for the rapid testing of new treatment approaches. Based on the evidence, hydroxychloroquine is the first medicine opted for the treatment of disease. Umifenovir, remdesivir, and fevipiravir are deemed the most hopeful antiviral agent by improving the health of infected patients. The dexamethasone is a first known steroid medicine that can save the lives of seriously ill patients, and it is shown in a randomized clinical trial by the United Kingdom that it reduced the death rate in COVID-19 patients. The current review recapitulates the existing evidence of possible therapeutic drugs, peptides, humanized antibodies, convulsant plasma, and vaccination that has revealed potential in fighting COVID-19 infections. Many randomized and controlled clinical trials are taking place to further validate these agent's safety and effectiveness in curing COVID-19.

Current trends in the real-life use of dalbavancin: report of a study panel.

Dalbavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with a chemical structure similar to teicoplanin. Dalbavancin has been approved and marketed since 2014 in the USA and 2015 in the European Union for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive cocci. ABSSSIs include infectious syndromes such as erysipelas, cellulitis, major cutaneous abscesses that require incision and drainage, and both surgical and traumatic wound infections. In current clinical practice, dalbavancin is also used for cardiac implantable electronic device-related soft tissue infection and other prosthetic infections, and therefore when the presence of biofilm is a concern. In this review, we aimed to highlight our experience with the use of dalbavancin for some of the most hard-to-treat Gram-positive infections, as well as a promising strategy in terms of pharmacoeconomic effectiveness. We describe our current real-life clinical practice with the use of dalbavancin, depicting a few representative clinical cases in order to share our own practice in the hospital setting.

Budget Impact Analysis of Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Three European Countries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) have been defined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013 to include a subset of complicated skin and skin structure infections commonly treated with parenteral antibiotic therapy. Inpatient treatment of ABSSSIs involves a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the economic impact on the National Health System associated with the management of non-severe ABSSSIs treated in hospitals with innovative long-acting dalbavancin compared to standard antibiotic therapy in Italy, Spain, and Austria. METHODS: A budget impact analysis was developed to evaluate the direct costs associated with the management of ABSSSI from the national public health system perspective. The model considered the possibility of early discharge of patients directly from the Emergency Department (ED), after 1 night in the hospital, or after two or three nights in the hospital. A scenario with Standard of Care was compared with a dalbavancin scenario, where patients had the possibility of being discharged early. The epidemiological and cost parameters were extrapolated from national administrative databases and from a systematic literature review for each country. The analysis was conducted in a 3-year time horizon. A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The model estimated an average annual number of patients with non-severe ABSSSI in Italy, Spain, and Austria equal to 5396, 7884, and 1788, respectively. A total annual expenditure of about €9.9 million, €13.5 million, and €3.4 million was estimated for treating the full set of ABSSSI patients in Italy, Spain, and Austria, respectively. Dalbavancin reduced the in-hospital length of stay in each country. In the first year of its introduction, dalbavancin significantly reduced the total economic burden in Italy and Spain (- €352,252 and - €233,991, respectively), while it increased the total economic burden in Austria (€80,769, 0.7% of the total expenditure for these patients); in the third year of its introduction, dalbavancin reduced the total economic burden in each Country (- €1.1 million, - €810,650, and - €70,269, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of dalbavancin in a new patient pathway to treat non-severe ABSSSI could generate a significant reduction in hospitalized patients and the overall patient length of stay in hospital.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

Our objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in order to evaluate the currently recommended dosing regimen in term and preterm neonates. By using an optimal design approach, a prospective PK study was designed and implemented in 60 neonates with postmenstrual ages (PMA) of 26 to 43 weeks. A loading dose of 16 mg/kg was administered at day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 8 mg/kg daily. Plasma concentrations were quantified by high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Population PK (popPK) analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations were performed to evaluate currently recommended dosing based on a pharmacodynamic index of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of ≥400. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data by the following equations: clearance (CL) = 0.0227 × (weight [wt]/1,765)0.75 × (estimated creatinine clearance [eCRCL]/22)0.672, central compartment volume of distribution (V1) = 0.283 (wt/1,765), intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.151 (wt/1,765)0.75, and peripheral compartment volume (V2) = 0.541 (wt/1,765). The interindividual variability estimates for CL, V1, and V2 were 36.5%, 45.7%, and 51.4%, respectively. Current weight (wt) and estimated creatinine clearance (eCRCL) significantly explained the observed variability. MC simulation demonstrated that, with the current dosing regimen, an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 was reached by only 68.5% of neonates with wt of <1 kg when the MIC was equal to 1 mg/kg, versus 82.2%, 89.7%, and 92.7% of neonates with wt of 1 to <2, 2 to <3, or ≥3 kg, respectively. Augmentation of a maintenance dose up to 10 or 11 mg/kg for preterm neonates with wt of 1 to <2 or <1 kg, respectively, increases the probability of reaching the therapeutic target; the recommended doses seem to be adequate for neonates with wt of ≥2 kg. Teicoplanin PK are variable in neonates, with wt and eCRCL having the most significant impact. Neonates with wt of <2 kg need higher doses, especially for Staphylococcus spp. with an MIC value of ≥1 mg/liter.