Phototherapy in dermatology: A call for action.

Of the wide range of treatment modalities available to dermatologists, few possess the history, efficacy, and safety of phototherapy. It should be emphasized that dermatologists are the only group of physicians optimally trained and qualified to understand the medical indications of phototherapy. Phototherapy, recognized for its cost-effectiveness, should remain a consideration in patient treatment. Continued training and education in residency and thereafter is needed to maintain the proficiency of physicians. In addition, payors need continued education to ensure that insurance coverage of phototherapy is not a barrier for patients to access this therapy. To further improve and optimize the outcome, phototherapy research needs to be supported.

Review of home phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient phototherapy is a safe, effective, and low-cost treatment modality for moderate to severe psoriasis. Barriers to outpatient phototherapy including patient inconvenience, patient co-pays, decreased physician compensation, and insurance disincentive structures have led to decreased use and underutilization of phototherapy. Home phototherapy can potentially overcome many of the barriers associated with outpatient treatment but is not widely used because of concerns over safety and efficacy, lack of resident and physician education, and lack of insurance coverage. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the use of phototherapy with emphasis on the safety, efficacy, and practical use of home phototherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive Pubmed literature search was done using the keywords NB-UVB, narrowband UVB, BB-UVB, broadband UVB, PUVA, psoralen and UVA, UVA, history of phototherapy, mechanism of phototherapy, phototherapy in dermatology, home phototherapy, and phototherapy for psoriasis. All relevant articles were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Home NB-UVB phototherapy can be as safe, effective, and cost-effective as outpatient phototherapy. Further, home UVB is more convenient for patients, has higher patient satisfaction, and a lower treatment burden compared to outpatient phototherapy. Home NB-UVB should be considered as a treatment option for patients eligible for phototherapy.

[The laundry-basket project--gender differences to the very skin. Different treatment of some common skin diseases in men and women]. / Tvättsäcksprojektet-- genusskillnader in på bara skinnet. Olika behandling för män och kvinnor vid några vanliga hudsjukdomar.

In this study, we have analysed the treatment traditions in a dermatological outpatient clinic, from a gender perspective. Eczema and psoriasis were of similar frequency in male and female patients, while a higher number of female patients had eczema of the hands. Ultraviolet light (UV) treatment was given to a higher number of male patients in all diagnostic groups including eczema of the hands. In addition, a higher number of given treatments was given to the male patients than to the female patients. As for prescriptions to male and female patients from our department and in Stockholm county (1.8 mill.), a much larger amount of preparations for local treatment was received by female patients, especially emollients. Male patients had received more of calcipotriol creme in addition to their being treated more intensively at the clinic. In a sub-group analysis on patients with psoriasis vulgaris on our clinic and in a patient cooperation-based treatment department, we found the same relation between male and female treatment as in the larger group. On follow-up, the number of female patients with psoriasis who were given treatment at our clinic had increased, but the number of treatments given to men was still higher than for female patients. An economic analysis of these findings show a great overweight of clinic-based treatment costs for male patients, while female patients receive emollients for self-care to a greater extent. We conclude that more studies are needed to clarify the basis of these findings.