Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 285
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 121, 2024 May 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722564

RESUMO

To develop and validate a 3D simulation model to calculate laser ablation (LA) zone size and estimate the volume of treated tissue for thyroid applications, a model was developed, taking into account dynamic optical and thermal properties of tissue change. For validation, ten Yorkshire swines were equally divided into two cohorts and underwent thyroid LA at 3 W/1,400 J and 3 W/1,800 J respectively with a 1064-nm multi-source laser (Echolaser X4 with Orblaze™ technology; ElEn SpA, Calenzano, Italy). The dataset was analyzed employing key statistical measures such as mean and standard deviation (SD). Model simulation data were compared with animal gross histology. Experimental data for longitudinal length, width (transverse length), ablation volume and sphericity were 11.0 mm, 10.0 mm, 0.6 mL and 0.91, respectively at 1,400 J and 14.6 mm, 12.4 mm, 1.12 mL and 0.83, respectively at 1,800 J. Gross histology data showed excellent reproducibility of the ablation zone among same laser settings; for both 1,400 J and 1,800 J, the SD of the in vivo parameters was ≤ 0.7 mm, except for width at 1,800 J, for which the SD was 1.1 mm. Simulated data for longitudinal length, width, ablation volume and sphericity were 11.6 mm, 10.0 mm, 0.62 mL and 0.88, respectively at 1,400 J and 14.2 mm, 12.0 mm, 1.06 mL and 0.84, respectively at 1,800 J. Experimental data for ablation volume, sphericity coefficient, and longitudinal and transverse lengths of thermal damaged area showed good agreement with the simulation data. Simulation datasets were successfully incorporated into proprietary planning software (Echolaser Smart Interface, Elesta SpA, Calenzano, Italy) to provide guidance for LA of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. Our mathematical model showed good predictability of coagulative necrosis when compared with data from in vivo animal experiments.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Glândula Tireoide , Animais , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Terapia a Laser/instrumentação , Glândula Tireoide/cirurgia , Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Suínos , Simulação por Computador , Modelos Teóricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 76(2): 210-220, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742554

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transient urinary incontinence (UI) is distressing event following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Novel technique namely, veil sparing HoLEP (VS-HoLEP), was proposed to improve early continence outcome. In this trial (NCT03494049), VS-HoLEP was compared to standard HoLEP (St-HoLEP). METHODS: VS-HoLEP entails early apical separation with sparing of ventral apical mucosal veil proximal to the verumontanum. Eligible symptomatic BPH patients were randomly allocated to St-HoLEP (91) and VS-HoLEP (89). The primary outcome was UI as depicted by one-hour pad test at one month postoperatively. Other outcome measures include all perioperative parameters, complications, and urinary outcome measures at different follow-up points. RESULTS: Median preoperative prostate size was 138 (50:282) and 128 (50:228) mL in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively. At one month the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test was 21 (23.1%) and 10 (11.4%) in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P 0.047). The difference was significantly in favor of VS-HoLEP considering the number of patients reporting UI, the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test as well as the grade of UI reported at one and 4 months. The difference was not statistically significant at 12 months. The median time to patients' reported continence was 8 (1-52) and 1.5 (1-52) weeks in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P≤0.005). The technique independently predicted positive one-hour pad test at one and four months respectively. At twelve months presence of DM (diabetes mellitus) and more percent PSA reduction independently predicted positive one-hour pad test. CONCLUSIONS: Veil sparing HoLEP enhances significantly early postoperative urine continence both subjectively and objectively. Optimization of the surgical technique could cut short the number of leaking patients and reduce the degree as well as the duration of transient postoperative urine leak.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Hiperplasia Prostática , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Neuro Oncol ; 26(6): 1152-1162, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170451

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) of intracranial tumors or radiation necrosis enables tissue diagnosis, cytoreduction, and rapid return to systemic therapies. Ablated tissue remains in situ, resulting in characteristic post-LITT edema associated with transient clinical worsening and complicating post-LITT response assessment. METHODS: All patients receiving LITT at a single center for tumors or radiation necrosis from 2015 to 2023 with ≥9 months of MRI follow-up were included. An nnU-Net segmentation model was trained to automatically segment contrast-enhancing lesion volume (CeLV) of LITT-treated lesions on T1-weighted images. Response assessment was performed using volumetric measurements. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty four unique MRI exams of 61 LITT-treated lesions and 6 control cases of medically managed radiation necrosis were analyzed. Automated segmentation was accurate in 367/384 (95.6%) images. CeLV increased to a median of 68.3% (IQR 35.1-109.2%) from baseline at 1-3 months from LITT (P = 0.0012) and returned to baseline thereafter. Overall survival (OS) for LITT-treated patients was 39.1 (9.2-93.4) months. Lesion expansion above 40% from volumetric nadir or baseline was considered volumetric progression. Twenty-one of 56 (37.5%) patients experienced progression for a volumetric progression-free survival of 21.4 (6.0-93.4) months. Patients with volumetric progression had worse OS (17.3 vs 62.1 months, P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Post-LITT CeLV expansion is quantifiable and resolves within 6 months of LITT. Development of response assessment criteria for LITT-treated lesions is feasible and should be considered for clinical trials. Automated lesion segmentation could speed the adoption of volumetric response criteria in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Terapia a Laser , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Redes Neurais de Computação , Idoso , Seguimentos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Aprendizado Profundo
4.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 55(12): 3051-3056, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584861

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) and simple prostatectomy (SP) are surgical treatment options for large gland Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. While multiple studies compare clinical outcomes of these procedures, there are limited data available comparing hospital charges in the United States. Here, we present current practice trends and a hospital charge analysis on a national level using an annual insurance claims data repository. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample databases for 2018 were queried. CPT and ICD-10PCS codes identified patients undergoing LEP or SP, who were then compared for practice setting, total hospital charges, and payor. Laser type for LEP and surgical approach for SP could not be differentiated. RESULTS: The median hospital charge of 5782 LEPs and 973 SPs is $26,689 and $51,250 (p < 0.001), respectively. LEP independently predicts a decreased hospital charge of $16,464 (p < 0.001) per case. Medicare is the primary payor for both procedures. More LEP procedures are completed in the outpatient setting (87.8%) vs. SPs (5.7%, p < 0.001). Median length of stay is longer for SP (LEP: 0, IQR: 0; SP: 3, IQR: 2-4; p < 0.001). In the Western region, LEP is least commonly performed (184, p < 0.001), most expensive ($43,960; p < 0.001), and has longer length of stay (2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LEP should be considered a cost-effective alternative to SP. Regions of the U.S. that perform more LEPs have shorter length of stay and lower hospital charges associated with the procedure.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Preços Hospitalares , Próstata/cirurgia , Medicare , Prostatectomia/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 141(7): 625-629, 2023 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200037

RESUMO

Importance: The efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery is well documented. An important requirement for decision makers is the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) over a sufficiently long horizon. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of this treatment was a preplanned secondary objective of the Economic Evaluation of Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery (FEMCAT) trial. Objective: To estimate the cost utility of FLACS compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) on a 12-month time horizon. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial compared FLACS with PCS in parallel groups. All FLACS procedures were performed using the CATALYS precision system. Participants were recruited and treated in ambulatory surgery settings in 5 university-hospital centers in France. All consecutive patients eligible for a unilateral or bilateral cataract surgery 22 years or older with written informed consent were included. Data were collected from October 2013 to October 2018, and data were analyzed from January 2020 to June 2022. Interventions: FLACS or PCS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Utility was measured through the Health Utility Index questionnaire. Costs of cataract surgery were estimated by microcosting. All inpatient and outpatient costs were collected from the French National Health Data System. Results: Of 870 randomized patients, 543 (62.4%) were female, and the mean (SD) age at surgery was 72.3 (8.6) years. A total of 440 patients were randomized to receive FLACS and 430 to receive PCS; the rate of bilateral surgery was 63.3% (551 of 870). The mean (SD) costs of cataract surgery were €1124.0 (€162.2; US $1235) for FLACS and €565.5 (€61.4; US $621) for PCS. The total mean (SD) cost of care at 12 months was €7085 (€6700; US $7787) in participants treated with FLACS and €6502 (€7323; US $7146) in participants treated with PCS. FLACS yielded a mean (SD) of 0.788 (0.009) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and PCS yielded 0.792 (0.009) QALYs. The difference in mean costs was €545.9 (95% CI, -434.1 to 1525.8; US $600), and the difference in QALYs was -0.004 (95% CI, -0.028 to 0.021). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was -€136 476 (US $150 000) per QALY. The cost-effectiveness probability of FLACS compared with PCS was 15.7% for a cost-effectiveness threshold of €30 000 (US $32 973) per QALY. At this threshold, the expected value of perfect information was €246 139 079 (US $270 530 231). Conclusions and Relevance: The ICER of FLACS compared with PCS was not within the $50 000 to $100 000 per QALY range frequently cited as cost-effective. Additional research and development on FLACS is needed to improve its effectiveness and lower its price. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01982006.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Terapia a Laser , Facoemulsificação , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Acuidade Visual , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Lasers
6.
Urol Int ; 107(4): 363-369, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858035

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has become popular worldwide for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Holmium laser is considered an ideal transurethral thermomechanical device for enucleating the prostate. Although there is evidence on Ho:YAG laser-related heat generation, the studies mainly investigated ex vivo temperature generation during holmium laser lithotripsy. In this in vivo study, we aimed to assess for the first time the real-time heat generated during HoLEP. METHODS: Fifteen HoLEP procedures were included. The study was conducted over a time period of 16 months. To investigate the temperature generation, a preoperatively inserted rectal temperature probe and a temperature sensor within a suprapubic bladder catheter were used to record the temperature change during enucleation and coagulation. RESULTS: The mean values of the temperature change during the laser enucleation and coagulation were -0.35 ± 0.203 K (IQR: 0.23) and +0.14 ± 0.259 K (IQR: 0.3), respectively, in rectal measurements. Temperature differences during laser use and coagulation were <+1 K and <+5 K, respectively, in bladder measurements. We measured no temperature >37.1°C during the procedures and no temperature values considered harmful to the human body. CONCLUSION: Sufficient irrigation flow rates and irrigation monitoring during HoLEP are obligatory. To prevent a high and uncontrolled temperature rise, the surgeon or operating room staff should pay attention to the irrigation's continuity.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirurgia , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hólmio , Terapia a Laser/métodos
7.
J Endourol ; 37(1): 60-66, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36193580

RESUMO

Introduction: Simple prostatectomy (SP) and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) are treatments for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with large glands (e.g., >80 g). The decision between the two operations is often dependent on surgeon preference/experience and equipment availability. As the use of minimally invasive techniques, such as robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy, has increased for the treatment of large gland BPH, studies comparing the outcomes and cost of these modalities in a contemporary cohort are lacking. Methods: All-payer data from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Databases from Florida, New York, California, and Maryland from 2016 to 2018 were used to identify adults who underwent SP or LEP for BPH. Patient demographics, facility characteristics, revisit rates, and cost of the index hospitalization were examined. Multivariable logistic and gamma generalized linear regression models were utilized to compare predictors of the operation performed, 30-day revisits, and index hospitalization cost among the two operations. Results: Of the 2032 patients in the cohort, 1067 (46.4%) underwent LEP and 965 (41.9%) underwent SP. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, SP patients were younger, had higher comorbidity scores, and were more likely to be uninsured compared with LEP patients. Thirty-day revisit rates among the operations were equivalent (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.63-1.27, p = 0.05). The mean adjusted cost of the index hospital stay for LEP was significantly greater than that of SP ($7291 vs $6442, p = 0.04). However, our sub-group analysis examining high-volume centers revealed no significant differences in cost ($6184 vs $5353, p = 0.1). Conclusions: Across the four states examined, SP and LEP were performed with comparable volume and had similar rates of 30-day revisits. The SP was less expensive than LEP overall; however, among high-volume facilities, the cost of both operations was reduced, such that they were equivalent.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Próstata/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Lasers , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Lasers Surg Med ; 54(8): 1116-1129, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36047422

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The transfer and widespread acceptance of laser-induced thermal therapy into gastroenterology remain a topic of interest. However, a practical approach to the quantitative effect of photothermal injury in the esophagus needs further investigation. Here, we aim to perform computer simulations that simulate laser scanning and calculate the laser-induced thermal damage area. The simulation engine offers the results in a guide map for laser coagulation with a well-confined therapeutic area according to laser irradiance and surface scanning speed. The study also presents validation experiments that include histology analyses in an ex vivo sheep esophagus model. METHODS: The simulation engine was developed based on the Monte-Carlo method and the Arrhenius damage integral. The computational model mimicked laser scanning by shifting the position of the calculated heat source in the grating system along the axis to be scanned. The performance of the simulations was tested in an ex vivo sheep esophagus model at a laser wavelength of 1505 nm. Histological analysis, hematoxylin-eosin staining, light microscope imaging, and block-face scanning electron microscopy were used to assess thermal damage to the tissue model. RESULTS: The developed simulation engine estimated the photothermal coagulation area for a surface scanning speed range of 0.5-8 mm/second and laser power of up to 0.5 W at a 0.9-nm laser diameter in a tissue model with a volume of 4 × 4 × 4 mm3 . For example, the optimum laser irradiation for effective photothermal coagulation in the mucosa and superficial submucosa depths was estimated to be between 16.4 and 31.8 W/cm2 , 23.2 and 38.1 W/cm2 at 0.5 and 1 mm/second, respectively. The computational results, summarized as a guide map, were directly compared with the results of ex vivo tissue experiments. In addition, it was pointed out that the comparative theoretical and experimental data overlap significantly in terms of energy density. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the developed simulation approach could be a seed algorithm for further preclinical and clinical trials and a complementary tool to the laser-induced photothermal coagulation technique for superficial treatments in the gastrointestinal tract. In future preclinical studies, it is thought that the simulation engine can be enriched by combining it with an in vivo model for different laser wavelengths.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Animais , Simulação por Computador , Esôfago/cirurgia , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Método de Monte Carlo , Ovinos
9.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 295: 466-469, 2022 Jun 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35773912

RESUMO

Benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is a common disease in men over 50 years old. The phenotype of patients with BPE is heterogenous, regarding both baseline patient characteristics and disease-related parameters. Treatment can be either medical-conservative or surgical. A great variety of surgical techniques are available for surgical management, with three of the most common being monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (mTUR-P), bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (bTUR-P), and bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate (bTUVis). The selection of each one of these depends on surgeon reasoning, equipment availability, patient characteristics, and preferences. Since all of these techniques are available in our Urology Department, and surgeons are skilled to perform each one of them, we performed a clustering analysis according to patient pre-operative characteristics, using the k-means algorithm, to compare clustering-related technique assignment with the real-life technique used.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Análise por Conglomerados , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Masculino , Próstata/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Ophthalmology ; 129(8): 946-954, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35570159

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate refractive outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). METHODS: A PubMed search of FLACS was conducted in August 2020. A total of 727 abstracts were reviewed and 33 were selected for full-text review. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this assessment. The panel methodologist assigned a level of evidence rating of I to all 12 studies. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean uncorrected distance visual acuity, best-corrected distance visual acuity, or the percentage of eyes within ± 0.5 and ± 1 diopter of intended refractive target between FLACS and PCS. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between the 2 groups, and most studies showed no difference in endothelial cell loss between FLACS and PCS at various time points between 1 and 6 months. In large randomized controlled studies in the United Kingdom and France, FLACS was less cost-effective than PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Both FLACS and PCS have similar excellent safety and refractive outcomes. At this time, one technique is not superior to the other, but economic analyses performed in some populations have shown that FLACS is less cost-effective.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Terapia a Laser , Oftalmologia , Facoemulsificação , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers , Facoemulsificação/métodos
11.
World J Urol ; 40(7): 1867-1872, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35614278

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There isscarce evidence to date on how temperature develops during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). We aimed to determine the potential heat generation during HoLEP under ex vivo conditions. METHODS: We developed two experimental setups. Firstly, we simulated HoLEP ex vivo using narrow-neck laboratory bottles mimicking enucleation cavities and a prostate resection trainer. Seven temperature probes were placed at different locations in the experimental setup, and the heat generation was measured separately during laser application. Secondly, we simulated high-frequency current-based coagulation of the vessels using a roller probe. RESULTS: We observed that the larger the enucleated cavity, the higher the temperature rises, regardless of the irrigation flow rate. The highest temperature difference with an irrigation flow was approximately + 4.5 K for a cavity measuring 100ccm and a 300 ml/min irrigation flow rate. The higher flow rate generates faster removal of the generated heat, thus cooling down the artificial cavity. Furthermore, the temperature differences at different irrigation flow rates (except at 0 ml/min) were consistently below 5 K. Within the resection trainer, the temperature increase with and without irrigation flow was approximately 0.5 K and 3.0 K, respectively. The mean depth of necrosis (1084 ± 176 µm) achieved by the roller probe was significantly greater when using 144 W energy. CONCLUSION: Carefully adjusted irrigation and monitoring during HoLEP are crucial when evacuating the thermal energy generated during the procedure. We believe this study of ours provides evidence with the potential to facilitate clinical studies on patient safety.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Hólmio , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Próstata/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Temperatura , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Lasers Surg Med ; 54(6): 851-860, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mid-infrared (IR) ablative fractional laser treatments are highly efficacious for improving the appearance of a variety of dermatological conditions such as photo-aged skin. However, articulated arms are necessary to transmit the mid-IR light to the skin, which restricts practicality and clinical use. Here, we have assessed and characterized a novel fiber laser-pumped difference frequency generation (DFG) system that generates ablative fractional lesions and compared it to clinically and commercially available thulium fiber, Erbium:YAG (Er:YAG), and CO2 lasers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An investigational 20 W, 3050/3200 nm fiber laser pumped DFG system with a focused spot size of 91 µm was used to generate microscopic ablation arrays in ex vivo human skin. Several pulse energies (10-70 mJ) and pulse durations (2-14 ms) were applied and lesion dimensions were assessed histologically using nitro-blue tetrazolium chloride stain. Ablation depths and coagulative thermal damage zones were analyzed across three additional laser systems. RESULTS: The investigational DFG system-generated deep (>2 mm depth) and narrow (<100 µm diameter) ablative lesions surrounded by thermal coagulative zones of at least 20 µm thickness compared to 13, 40, and 320 µm by the Er:YAG, CO2 , and Thulium laser, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DFG system is a small footprint device that offers a flexible fiber delivery system for ablative fractional laser treatments, thereby overcoming the requirement of an articulated arm in current commercially available ablative lasers. The depth and width of the ablated microcolumns and the extent of surrounding coagulation can be controlled; this concept can be used to design new treatment procedures for specific indications. Clinical improvements and safety are not the subject of this study and need to be explored with in vivo clinical studies.


Assuntos
Dermatologia , Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Gás , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Envelhecimento da Pele , Idoso , Dióxido de Carbono , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Pele/patologia , Túlio
13.
Curr Opin Urol ; 32(3): 318-323, 2022 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35249967

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of how surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) procedures are compensated in the United States and the implications of the current reimbursement system on the care of patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The resource-based relative value care system is Medicare's current reimbursement model. There is strong evidence that the current system does not adequately account for complex care. Consequently, for BPH surgical procedures, treatment options best suited for complex patients are not adequately reimbursed which may have implications on healthcare delivery and outcomes. SUMMARY: Inadequate reimbursement for certain BPH procedures may disincentivize the care of complex patients. Procedures such a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate are well suited for complex patients but have a steep learning curve. The incentive to learn and offer such procedures to complex patients may be unfairly influenced by reimbursement levels, which in the end penalizes patients and the treatments available to them.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Idoso , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Masculino , Medicare , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
14.
Curr Urol Rep ; 23(1): 11-18, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35156176

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this paper is to review the literature detailing US-based analyses for cost and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment options for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and associated LUTS. RECENT FINDINGS: TURP offers the greatest degree of symptom improvement with its associated costs dependent upon operating room time, equipment, and length of hospital stay. Other studied surgical treatment modalities, including transurethral laser ablative, thermal ablative, and convective water vapor modalities as well as prostatic urethral lift and transabdominal procedures, generally carry higher costs and lower cost-effectiveness in both inpatient and outpatient settings, with specific exceptions. Compared to TURP, HoLEP and Greenlight PVP have demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness for mild, moderate, and severe BPH. Convective water vapor ablation, as with transurethral microwave/thermoablative therapies, has been observed to be less expensive per procedure than TURP on average. However, it conferred lower degrees of IPSS symptom improvement. Moreover, compared to TURP, prostatic artery embolization has demonstrated lower average costs coupled with inferior objective improvement in maximal flow rate, prostate volume reduction, PSA decline and minimal improvement in IPSS subjective outcome measures. For this review, selection bias, asymmetric patient groups, issues with study aggregation, and understudied cost contributors (including retreatment costs, long-term durability of symptom relief, recovery time, and work productivity limitations) were identified as key limitations. Nevertheless, this overview takes important steps to understand the costs of surgical treatment options for BPH, allowing for more informed clinical and policy decisions.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Masculino , Próstata , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretra
15.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 45(3): 331-337, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063295

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To explore the national trend in prescriptions for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT) in France between 2014 and 2019. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study based on prescription data from the Primary Health Insurance Fund databases. All patients with a social security number who received one or more glaucoma/OHT prescriptions between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Figures for 2020 are not yet available as of the date of submission of this article. Demographic characteristics from Common Classification of Medical Acts information and from National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies were analyzed. The data analysis was carried out using the R version 3.6.2.software from the available databases of the Information Systems Medicalization Program. RESULTS: Our results suggest an increase in the number of patients treated with glaucoma drugs, which cannot be explained simply by demographic growth. There is also a change in drug prescription habits, both in the class of medication used and in the use of fixed combinations. We also note the increasing use of SLT (Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty), a relatively newer tool in the therapeutic arsenal. Over the same time period, demographic characteristics remained stable; age and sex distribution for each year remained constant. In addition, the phenomenon of poor therapeutic compliance, which we attempted to explore, remained stable. DISCUSSION: This study updates the French epidemiologic data available on prescriptions for glaucoma and ocular hypertension, a true public health concern. CONCLUSION: On the one hand, prescribing practices have evolved over the study period. On the other hand, the number of patients treated has increased faster than the growth of the French population over the same period. These findings are consistent with trends observed in previous studies.


Assuntos
Glaucoma , Terapia a Laser , Hipertensão Ocular , Trabeculectomia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Glaucoma/tratamento farmacológico , Glaucoma/epidemiologia , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Hipertensão Ocular/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Ocular/epidemiologia , Prescrições , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trabeculectomia/métodos
16.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 166(5): 901-906, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34399642

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Surgeons generally determine depth of resection during transoral laser cordectomy by visual inspection of the surgical field. Our aim was to examine the correlation between early glottic cancer depth of resection as reported by surgeons in the operation report and depth of resection defined by pathology specimens, using various staining techniques intended to differentiate between the distinct vocal fold layers based on particular collagen deposition. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A voice and swallowing clinic at a tertiary referral hospital. METHODS: We compared depth of cordectomy assessed intraoperatively by surgeons and by pathologists using Picrosirius red stain and collagen I immunohistochemistry stain in 32 patients who underwent transoral laser cordectomy for early glottic cancer. RESULTS: For type I, II, and III cordectomy, the respective proportions of patients were 14 (47%), 9 (30%), and 7 (23%) according to surgeons' estimations; 2 (6%), 17 (55%), and 12 (39%) according to Picrosirius red stain; and 3 (11%), 12 (44%), and 12 (45%) according to immunohistochemistry for collagen I. CONCLUSION: Surgeons' reported depth of resection did not correlate with depth of resection established by either staining technique. Determining depth of resection necessitates special stains, which should help in the clinical assessment of cordectomy type.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Laríngeas , Terapia a Laser , Neoplasias da Língua , Glote/patologia , Glote/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Língua/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Prega Vocal/patologia , Prega Vocal/cirurgia
17.
Prog Urol ; 32(3): 198-204, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148770

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis of the current gold standard operation of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) compared to the new technique of water vapor thermal therapy with the Rezum™ system for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2017 and January 2020, consecutive patients with invalidating lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH who underwent Rezum™ and HoLEP procedures from the Aix regional hospital were identified. The outcome of each technique was assessed in terms of cost from the institutional perspective. Detailed expense reports based were provided by the accounts department of the hospital. These were used to compare in-hospital costs for each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 53 and 94 consecutive patients underwent respectively water vapor thermal therapy and HoLEP. The median costs for the surgical procedure were €1344 (IQR 1331-1361) and €669 (IQR 584-824), respectively for Rezum™ and HoLEP (median difference €675; P<0.001). The median costs of the hospital stay were €869 (IQR 869-869) for Rezum™ and €1295 (IQR 1295-1330) for HoLEP (median difference €426; P<0.001). Finally, the median total costs per patient were lower for HoLEP (€2005 [IQR 1902-2150]) than for Rezum™ (€2228 [IQR 2209-2243]) procedure, and the median difference of €233 was significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One of the anticipated benefits of Rezum™, reduced length of hospital stay with an associated reduction in cost, did not materialize within this study. The patient's clinical condition and expectations should also be taken into account when deciding between Rezum™ and standard therapies. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Vapor , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Urology ; 149: 193-198, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33412221

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight from the experience of learning Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), teaching HoLEP, and the current HoLEP practice patterns of fellowship-trained endourologists. METHODS: Surveys were electronically distributed to United States (U.S.) practicing urologists who completed American Endourology fellowships (that included HoLEP) within the past 6 years. Questions focused on HoLEP training and current practice patterns. RESULTS: As of September 2019, 12% (6/49) of U.S. endourology fellowships reported including HoLEP as a component of training. With a 73% response rate (16 of 22), 81% participated in over 20 cases during training, while 50% participated in over 50. A total of 25% independently completed over 50 cases from start to finish. At training completion, most (80%) felt comfortable/somewhat comfortable completing an entire HoLEP independently and managing post-op complications. Seventy-five percent practice HoLEP currently, and 25% teach to trainees. When asked "What is most challenging about HoLEP in current practice?" common responses were: efficiency/profitability concerns, poor reimbursement, educating OR/hospital staff, establishing case volume, minimizing sphincter trauma, and large glands (>200gm). CONCLUSION: With diverse exposure in fellowship, most incorporate HoLEP into their practice after training. Aspects of the procedure remain challenging after several years of experience. Profitability/reimbursement concerns should be further explored to increase HoLEP adoption.


Assuntos
Endoscopia/educação , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/educação , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Endoscopia/instrumentação , Endoscopia/métodos , Endoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/instrumentação , Terapia a Laser/estatística & dados numéricos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Prostatectomia/instrumentação , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologistas/educação , Urologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(3): 234-244, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781827

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis can be treated in the office or operating room (OR). The choice of treatment is based on several factors, including patient and surgeon preference. However, there is little data to guide the decision-making. This study examines the available literature comparing operative treatment in-office versus OR. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Of 2,864 articles identified, 78 were reviewed full-length and 18 were included. Outcomes of interest were recurrence and complication rates, number of procedures, time interval between procedures, and cost. RESULTS: Only one study compared outcomes of operative in-office to OR treatments. The weighted average complication rate for OR procedures was 0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.32), n = 8, and for office procedures, 0.17 (95% CI 0.08-0.33), n = 6. The weighted average time interval between OR procedures was 10.59 months (5.83, 15.35) and for office procedures 5.40 months (3.26-7.54), n = 1. The weighted average cost of OR procedures was $10,105.22 ($5,622.51-14,587.83), n = 2 versus $2,081.00 ($1,987.64-$2,174.36), n = 1 for office procedures. CONCLUSION: Only one study compares office to OR treatment. The overall data indicate no differences aside from cost and imply that office procedures may be more cost-effective than OR procedures. However, the heterogeneous data limits any strong comparison of outcomes between office and OR-based treatment of laryngeal papillomas. More studies to compare the two treatment settings are warranted.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Salas Cirúrgicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Papiloma/cirurgia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/cirurgia , Infecções Respiratórias/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/economia , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA