Bioreactance assessment of cardiac output lacks reliability for the follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Cardiac output (CO) is one of the primary prognostic factors evaluated during the follow-up of patients treated for pulmonary hypertension (PH). It is recommended that it be measured using the thermodilution technique during right heart catheterization. The difficulty to perform iterative invasive measurements on the same individual led us to consider a non-invasive option. The aims of the present study were to assess the agreement between CO values obtained using bioreactance (Starling™ SV) and thermodilution, and to evaluate the ability of the bioreactance monitor to detect patients whose CO decreased by more than 15% during follow-up and, accordingly, its usefulness for patient monitoring. A prospective cohort study evaluating the performance of the Starling™ SV monitor was conducted in patients with clinically stable PH. Sixty patients referred for hemodynamic assessment were included. CO was measured using both the thermodilution technique and bioreactance during two follow-up visits. A total of 60 PH patients were included. All datasets were available at the baseline visit (V0) and 50 of them were usable during the follow-up visit (V1). Median [IQR] CO was 4.20 l/min [3.60-4.70] when assessed by bioreactance, and 5.30 l/min [4.57-6.20] by thermodilution (p<0.001). The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.51 [0.36-0.64], and the average deviation on Bland-Altman plot was -1.25 l/min (95% CI [-1.48-1.01], p<0.001). The ability of the monitor to detect a variation in CO of more than 15% between two follow-up measurements, when such variation existed using thermodilution, was insufficient for clinical practice (AUC = 0.54, 95% CI [0.33-0.75]).

Modified Thermodilution for Simultaneous Cardiac Output and Recirculation Assessment in Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

BACKGROUND: Thermodilution is unreliable in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Systemic oxygenation depends on recirculation fractions and ratios of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) flow to cardiac output. In a prospective in vitro simulation, this study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a modified thermodilution technique for recirculation and cardiac output. The hypothesis was that this method provided clinically acceptable precision and accuracy for cardiac output and recirculation. METHODS: Two ECMO circuits ran in parallel: one representing a VV-ECMO and the second representing native heart, lung, and circulation. Both circuits shared the right atrium. Extra limbs for recirculation and pulmonary shunt were added. This study simulated ECMO flows from 1 to 2.5 l/min and cardiac outputs from 2.5 to 3.5 l/min with recirculation fractions (0 to 80%) and pulmonary shunts. Thermistors in both ECMO limbs and the pulmonary artery measured the temperature changes induced by cold bolus injections into the arterial ECMO limb. Recirculation fractions were calculated from the ratio of the areas under the temperature curve (AUCs) in the ECMO limbs and from partitioning of the bolus volume (flow based). With known partitioning of bolus volumes between ECMO and pulmonary artery, cardiac output was calculated. High-precision ultrasonic flow probes served as reference for Bland-Altman plots and linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Accuracy and precision for both the recirculation fraction based on AUC (bias, -5.4%; limits of agreement, -18.6 to 7.9%) and flow based (bias, -5.9%; limits of agreement, -18.8 to 7.0%) are clinically acceptable. Calculated cardiac output for all recirculation fractions was accurate but imprecise (RecirculationAUC: bias 0.56 l/min; limits of agreement, -2.27 to 3.4 l/min; and RecirculationFLOW: bias 0.48 l/min; limits of agreement, -2.22 to 3.19 l/min). Recirculation fraction increased bias and decreased precision. CONCLUSIONS: Adapted thermodilution for VV-ECMO allows simultaneous measurement of recirculation fraction and cardiac output and may help optimize patient management with severe respiratory failure.

Reproducibility of bolus versus continuous thermodilution for assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with ANOCA.

BACKGROUND: A bolus thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) has emerged as the standard for assessing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Continuous thermodilution has recently been introduced as a tool to quantify absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance directly. Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) derived from continuous thermodilution has been proposed as a novel metric of microvascular function, which is independent of epicardial stenoses and myocardial mass. AIMS: We aimed to assess the reproducibility of bolus and continuous thermodilution in assessing coronary microvascular function. METHODS: Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) at angiography were prospectively enrolled. Bolus and continuous intracoronary thermodilution measurements were obtained in duplicate in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either bolus thermodilution first or continuous thermodilution first. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled. The mean fractional flow reserve (FFR) was 0.86±0.06. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) calculated with continuous thermodilution (CFRcont) was significantly lower than bolus thermodilution-derived CFR (CFRbolus; 2.63±0.65 vs 3.29±1.17; p<0.001). CFRcont showed a higher reproducibility than CFRbolus (variability: 12.7±10.4% continuous vs 31.26±24.85% bolus; p<0.001). MRR showed a higher reproducibility than IMR (variability 12.4±10.1% continuous vs 24.2±19.3% bolus; p<0.001). No correlation was found between MRR and IMR (r=0.1, 95% confidence interval: -0.09 to 0.29; p=0.305). CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of coronary microvascular function, continuous thermodilution demonstrated significantly less variability on repeated measurements than bolus thermodilution.

Thermodilution Assessment of Cardiac Index in Patients With Tricuspid Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Disparities between thermodilution (TD) and Fick measurements of cardiac index (CI) are common in real-world clinical practice. Published studies about the effect of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on TD are small and describe conflicting results. We tested the correlation between TD and Fick across a wide range of TR severity, in a larger group of patients undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC). We aimed to determine if TD is an acceptable alternative to Fick in patients with TR in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing RHC at a single center over a 10-month period, and included those with recent (<90 days) echocardiograms. TD was measured during RHC and Fick was calculated using estimated oxygen consumption. The primary outcome was the correlation between TD and Fick CIs. We performed regression modeling to evaluate predictors of the difference between TD and Fick. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were included, 40% of whom had at least moderate TR. The correlation between TD and Fick was strong (r=0.765) and did not significantly differ in those with none to mild TR (r=0.73) and those with moderate to severe TR (r=0.80). Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter was the only variable significantly associated with the difference between CI by Fick and TD (P=.04). CONCLUSION: The correlation between TD and Fick was strong and unaffected by TR severity.

Cardiac output assessment methods in left ventricular assist device patients: A problem of heteroscedasticity.

Equipoise remains about how best to measure cardiac output (CO) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). In this study, direct Fick CO was compared with thermodilution (TD) and indirect Fick (iFick) CO in 61 LVAD patients. TD and LaFarge iFick showed moderate correlation with direct Fick (R2 = 0.49 and R2 = 0.38, p < 0.001 for both), while Dehmer and Bergstra iFick showed poor correlation with direct Fick (R2 = 0.29 and R2 = 0.31, p < 0.001 for both). Absolute bias between all CO estimation techniques and direct Fick CO was lowest for TD compared to iFick methods but significant for all methods. All methods tended to overestimate CO compared to direct Fick, with greatest overestimation present in those with the lowest measured direct Fick CO. Bias and frequency of significant discrepancy were least using TD and Lafarge iFick CO estimation methods in this study, with TD CO demonstrating modestly better correlation and less heteroscedasticity compared to Lafarge.

Wearable Seismocardiography-Based Assessment of Stroke Volume in Congenital Heart Disease.

Background Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk for the development of low cardiac output and other physiologic derangements, which could be detected early through continuous stroke volume (SV) measurement. Unfortunately, existing SV measurement methods are limited in the clinic because of their invasiveness (eg, thermodilution), location (eg, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging), or unreliability (eg, bioimpedance). Multimodal wearable sensing, leveraging the seismocardiogram, a sternal vibration signal associated with cardiomechanical activity, offers a means to monitoring SV conveniently, affordably, and continuously. However, it has not been evaluated in a population with significant anatomical and physiological differences (ie, children with CHD) or compared against a true gold standard (ie, cardiac magnetic resonance). Here, we present the feasibility of wearable estimation of SV in a diverse CHD population (N=45 patients). Methods and Results We used our chest-worn wearable biosensor to measure baseline ECG and seismocardiogram signals from patients with CHD before and after their routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, and derived features from the measured signals, predominantly systolic time intervals, to estimate SV using ridge regression. Wearable signal features achieved acceptable SV estimation (28% error with respect to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging) in a held-out test set, per cardiac output measurement guidelines, with a root-mean-square error of 11.48 mL and R2 of 0.76. Additionally, we observed that using a combination of electrical and cardiomechanical features surpassed the performance of either modality alone. Conclusions A convenient wearable biosensor that estimates SV enables remote monitoring of cardiac function and may potentially help identify decompensation in patients with CHD.

Accurate assessment of coronary blood flow by continuous thermodilution technique: Validation in a swine model.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of coronary thermodilution measurements made with the RayFlow® infusion catheter. BACKGROUND: Measurements of absolute coronary blood flow (ABF) and absolute microvascular resistance (Rµ ) by continuous coronary thermodilution can be obtained in humans but their accuracy using a novel dedicated infusion catheter has not yet been validated. We compared ABF values obtained at different infusion rates to coronary blood flow (CBF) values obtained using flow probes, in swine. METHODS: Twelve domestic swine were instrumented with coronary flow probes placed around the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries. ABF was assessed with the RayFlow® infusion catheter during continuous saline infusion at fixed rates of 5 (n = 14), 10 (n = 15), 15 (n = 19), and 20 (n = 12) ml/min. RESULTS: In the 60 measurements, ABF measured using thermodilution averaged 41 ± 17 ml/min (range from 17 to 90) and CBF values obtained with the coronary flow probes averaged 37 ± 18 ml/min (range from 8 to 87). The corresponding Rµ values were 1532 ± 791 (range from 323 to 5103) and 1903 ± 1162 (range from 287 to 6000) Woods units using thermodilution and coronary flow probe assessments, respectively. ABF and Rµ values measured using thermodilution were significantly correlated with the corresponding measurements obtained using coronary flow probes (R = 0.84 [0.73-0.95] and R = 0.80 [0.69-0.88], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ABF and Rµ assessed by continuous saline infusion through a RayFlow® catheter closely correlate with measurements obtained with the gold standard coronary flow probes in a swine model.

Microvascular Resistance Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: JACC Technology Corner.

The need for a quantitative and operator-independent assessment of coronary microvascular function is increasingly recognized. We propose the theoretical framework of microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) as an index specific for the microvasculature, independent of autoregulation and myocardial mass, and based on operator-independent measurements of absolute values of coronary flow and pressure. In its general form, MRR equals coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) corrected for driving pressures. In 30 arteries, pressure, temperature, and flow velocity measurements were obtained simultaneously at baseline (BL), during infusion of saline at 10 mL/min (rest) and 20 mL/min (hyperemia). A strong correlation was found between continuous thermodilution-derived MRR and Doppler MRR (r = 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.93; P < 0.001). MRR was independent from the epicardial resistance, the lower the FFR value, the greater the difference between MRR and CFR. Therefore, MRR is proposed as a specific, quantitative, and operator-independent metric to quantify coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Cardiac Output Measurement With Echocardiography and Pressure Recording Analytical Method in Pediatric Patients Admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Assessment of Bias Between the Two Methods.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare, in a cohort of critically ill children with biventricular anatomy and no cardiovascular shunt, cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) assessed by echocardiography and a continuous pulse-contour method, MostCareUP, to measure the differences between these techniques (biasCO and biasCI), and their association with clinical variables. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: Children admitted to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit who underwent echocardiography with CO measurement. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included. BiasCO was -0.02 (0.26) L/min (percentage error 36%). BiasCI was 0.07 (0.34) L/min/m2 (percentage error 18%). Biases and percentage errors were higher in 24 nonsupervised echocardiographies. A negative biasCO (overestimation by MostCareUP) was associated with post-surgical status (v cardiomyopathy), higher systolic arterial pressure, and spontaneous breathing (v intubation). When only absolute values were considered, biasCONONEG correlated with age, weight, arterial pressure, and heart rate, whereas biasCINONEG was associated with a femoral arterial cannula, no use of inotropes, and the absence of mechanical ventilation. After adjustment, biasCONONEG remained independently associated with patients' body weight(p = 0.0001). BiasCINONEG showed a nonlinear relationship with weight below 20 kg and above 40 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Children with extreme low or high weights, those who are extubated, and those with a femoral cannula carry the highest bias. When younger patients are considered, CI should be evaluated instead of CO, because biases are better highlighted by indexing data on body surface area. In children, both echocardiography and MostCareUP may be responsible of inaccurate CO/CI assessment.

Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output in Advanced Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Candidates Using the Bioreactance Method.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the validity and trending ability of the bioreactance method in estimating cardiac output at rest and in response to stress in advanced heart failure patients and heart transplant candidates. DESIGN: This was a prospective single-center study. SETTING: This study was conducted at the heart transplant center at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients with advanced chronic heart failure due to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (19 ± 7%), and peak oxygen consumption 12.3 ± 3.9 mL/kg/min. INTERVENTIONS: Participants underwent right heart catheterization using the Swan-Ganz catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac output was measured simultaneously using thermodilution and bioreactance at rest and during active straight leg raise test to volitional exertion. There was no significant difference in cardiac index values obtained by the thermodilution and bioreactance methods (2.26 ± 0.59 v 2.38 ± 0.50 L/min, p > 0.05) at rest and peak straight leg raise test (2.92 ± 0.77 v 3.01 ± 0.66 L/min, p > 0.05). In response to active leg raise test, thermodilution cardiac output increased by 22% and bioreactance by 21%. There was also a strong relationship between cardiac outputs from both methods at rest (r = 0.88, p < 0.01) and peak straight leg raise test (r = 0.92, p < 0.01). Cartesian plot analysis showed good trending ability of bioreactance compared with thermodilution (concordance rate = 93%) CONCLUSIONS: `Cardiac output measured by the bioreactance method is comparable to that from the thermodilution method. Bioreactance method may be used in clinical practice to assess hemodynamics and improve management of advanced heart failure patients undergoing heart transplant assessment.

Thermodilution-Based Invasive Assessment of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow and Microvascular Resistance: Quantification of Microvascular (Dys)Function?

During the last two decades, there has been a sharp increase in both interest and knowledge about the coronary microcirculation. Since these small vessels are not visible by the human eye, physiologic measurements should be used to characterize their function. The invasive methods presently used (coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR)) are operator-dependent and mandate the use of adenosine to induce hyperemia. In recent years, a new thermodilution-based method for measurement of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance has been proposed and initial procedural problems have been overcome. Presently, the technique is easy to perform using the Rayflow infusion catheter and the Coroventis software. The method is accurate, reproducible, and completely operator-independent. This method has been validated noninvasively against the current golden standard for flow assessment: Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT). In addition, absolute flow and resistance measurements have proved to be safe, both periprocedurally and at long-term follow-up. With an increasing number of studies being performed, this method has great potential for better understanding and quantification of microvascular disease.

Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed-Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement.

Background Accurate assessment of cardiac output is critical to the diagnosis and management of various cardiac disease states; however, clinical standards of direct Fick and thermodilution are invasive. Noninvasive alternatives, such as closed-circuit acetylene (C2H2) rebreathing, warrant validation. Methods and Results We analyzed 10 clinical studies and all available cardiopulmonary stress tests performed in our laboratory that included a rebreathing method and direct Fick or thermodilution. Studies included healthy individuals and patients with clinical disease. Simultaneous cardiac output measurements were obtained under normovolemic, hypovolemic, and hypervolemic conditions, along with submaximal and maximal exercise. A total of 3198 measurements in 519 patients were analyzed (mean age, 59 years; 48% women). The C2H2 method was more precise than thermodilution in healthy individuals with half the typical error (TE; 0.34 L/min [r=0.92] and coefficient of variation, 7.2%) versus thermodilution (TE=0.67 [r=0.70] and coefficient of variation, 13.2%). In healthy individuals during supine rest and upright exercise, C2H2 correlated well with thermodilution (supine: r=0.84, TE=1.02; exercise: r=0.82, TE=2.36). In patients with clinical disease during supine rest, C2H2 correlated with thermodilution (r=0.85, TE=1.43). C2H2 was similar to thermodilution and nitrous oxide (N2O) rebreathing technique compared with Fick in healthy adults (C2H2 rest: r=0.85, TE=0.84; C2H2 exercise: r=0.87, TE=2.39; thermodilution rest: r=0.72, TE=1.11; thermodilution exercise: r=0.73, TE=2.87; N2O rest: r=0.82, TE=0.94; N2O exercise: r=0.84, TE=2.18). The accuracy of the C2H2 and N2O methods was excellent (r=0.99, TE=0.58). Conclusions The C2H2 rebreathing method is more precise than, and as accurate as, the thermodilution method in a variety of patients, with accuracy similar to an N2O rebreathing method approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Assessment of Right Heart Function during Extracorporeal Therapy by Modified Thermodilution in a Porcine Model.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy is a growing treatment modality for acute cardiorespiratory failure. Cardiac output monitoring during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy remains challenging. This study aims to validate a new thermodilution technique during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy using a pig model. METHODS: Sixteen healthy pigs were centrally cannulated for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and precision flow probes for blood flow assessment were placed on the pulmonary artery. After chest closure, cold boluses of 0.9% saline solution were injected into the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit, right atrium, and right ventricle at different extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flows (4, 3, 2, 1 l/min). Rapid response thermistors in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit and pulmonary artery recorded the temperature change. After calculating catheter constants, the distributions of injection volumes passing each circuit were assessed and enabled calculation of pulmonary blood flow. Analysis of the exponential temperature decay allowed assessment of right ventricular function. RESULTS: Calculated blood flow correlated well with measured blood flow (r2 = 0.74, P < 0.001). Bias was -6 ml/min [95% CI ± 48 ml/min] with clinically acceptable limits of agreement (668 ml/min [95% CI ± 166 ml/min]). Percentage error varied with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flow reductions, yielding an overall percentage error of 32.1% and a percentage error of 24.3% at low extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flows. Right ventricular ejection fraction was 17 [14 to 20.0]%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow reductions increased end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes with reductions in pulmonary vascular resistance. Central venous pressure and right ventricular ejection fractions remained unchanged. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes correlated highly (r2 = 0.98, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adapted thermodilution allows reliable assessment of cardiac output and right ventricular behavior. During veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, the right ventricle dilates even with stable function, possibly because of increased venous return.

Invasive versus non-invasive assessment of valvuloarterial impedance in severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: As a measure of the global left ventricular afterload, valvuloarterial impedance (ZVA) can be estimated using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and invasive measuring methods. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of TTE in measuring ZVA with invasive haemodynamics, direct Fick and thermodilution (TD), in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with severe AS who underwent TTE and bilateral heart catheterisation preaortic valve replacement. ZVA was calculated non-invasively from TTE and invasively using TD and Fick. The differences in measurements were estimated using a generalised estimating equation approach. The exchangeability of the measurements from different methods was evaluated under binary risk stratification rules. RESULTS: The mean±SD ZVA by TTE was 4.6±1.4 vs 4.9±1.6 by TD vs 4.3±1.2 mm Hg m2/mL by Fick. From multivariate analyses, ZVA by TTE was 5.9% (95% CI -15.0 to 2.5) lower than by TD and 5.9% (95% CI -1.5 to 12.8) higher than by Fick. At the same time, ZVA by TD was 12.5% (3.0 to 22.9) higher than with Fick. Risk classifications for ZVA-based binary decision rules showed poor agreement between TTE and invasive methods (kappa ≤0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The differences in ZVA estimates between TTE and invasive standards do not appear to exceed those between the standards. As such TTE-based estimates may be deemed acceptable as a clinical measure of global haemodynamic load. However, TTE-based and invasive measurements may not be interchangeable to identify patients at risk using binary classification rules based on ZVA.

B-Lines for the assessment of extravascular lung water: Just focused or semi-quantitative?

BACKGROUND: B-lines as typical artefacts of lung ultrasound are considered as surrogate measurement for extravascular lung water. However, B-lines develop in the sub-pleural space and do not allow assessment of the whole lung. Here, we present data from the first observational multi-centre study focusing on the correlation between a B-lines score and extravascular lung water in critically ill patients suffering from a variety of diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 184 adult patients, 443 measurements were obtained. B-lines were counted and expressed in a score which was compared to extravascular lung water, measured by single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution. Appropriate correlation coefficients were calculated and receiver operating characteristics (ROC-) curves were plotted. RESULTS: Overall, B-lines score was correlated with body weight-indexed extravascular lung water characterized by r = .59. The subgroup analysis revealed a correlation coefficient in patients without an infection of r = .44, in those with a pulmonary infection of r = .75 and in those with an abdominal infection of r = .23, respectively. Using ROC-analysis the sensitivity and specificity of B-lines for detecting an increased extravascular lung water (>10 mL/kg) was 63% and 79%, respectively. In patients with a P/F ratio <200 mm Hg, sensitivity and specificity to predict an increased extravascular lung water was 71% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of B-lines does not accurately reflect actual extravascular lung water. In presence of an impaired oxygenation, B-lines may reliably indicate increased extravascular lung water as cause of the oxygenation disorders.

Doppler echocardiography for assessment of systemic vascular resistances in cardiogenic shock patients.

OBJECTIVE: Impaired vascular tone plays an important role in cardiogenic shock. Doppler echocardiography provides a non-invasive estimation of systemic vascular resistance. The aim of the present study was to compare Doppler echocardiography with the transpulmonary thermodilution method for the assessment of systemic vascular resistance in patients with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: This prospective monocentric comparison study was conducted in a single cardiology intensive care unit (Hopital Nord, Marseille, France). We assessed the systemic vascular resistance index by both echocardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in 28 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock, on admission and after the introduction of an inotrope or vasopressor treatment. RESULTS: A total of 35 paired echocardiographic and transpulmonary thermodilution estimations of the systemic vascular resistance index were compared. Echocardiography values ranged from 1309 to 3526 dynes.s.m2/cm5 and transpulmonary thermodilution values ranged from 1320 to 3901 dynes.s.m2/cm5. A statistically significant correlation was found between echocardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution (r=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.93; P<0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI 0.72, 0.92). The mean bias was -111.95 dynes.s.m2/cm5 (95% CI -230.06, 6.16). Limits of agreement were -785.86, 561.96. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography constitutes an accurate non-invasive alternative to transpulmonary thermodilution to provide an estimation of systemic vascular resistance in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Ultrasound dilution and thermodilution versus color Doppler ultrasound for arteriovenous fistula assessment in children on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: This study is aimed at comparing ultrasound dilution (UD) and thermodilution (TD) with color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) assessment in children on hemodialysis (HD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients were dialysed with the Fresenius 5008 HD machine. UD was performed using the Transonic device. The two methods were compared with CDU performed on a non-HD day. AVF flow rate was expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: Sixteen measurements of AVF flow rate and recirculation with UD and TD were compared with CDU in 16 patients with a median weight of 39 kg. Both UD and TD overestimated AVF flow rate when compared with CDU (+437 (95% CI + 200, + 674) and + 476 (95% CI + 80, + 871) ml/min/1.73 m2 for UD and TD, respectively). CDU flow rate was significantly correlated to UD flow rate (r2 = 0.761, p < 0.001), but not to TD flow rate (r2 = 0.164, p = 0.120). Although recirculation in all AVF was estimated to be 0% and < 15% with UD and TD, respectively, 7 significant stenoses were diagnosed by CDU. AVF with stenosis had lower flow rates when measured by CDU, UD or TD, but only CDU measurements reached statistical significance (p = 0.008, p = 0.142 and p = 0.174, respectively). CONCLUSION: UD and TD overestimate AVF flow rate when compared with CDU, which is the most reliable non-invasive method for screening vascular access for stenosis. UD seems more accurate than TD for AVF flow rate assessment. Recirculation via UD or TD should not be used for early screening of AVF stenosis in children on HD.

Are Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Suitable for Cardiac Output Assessment With Transpulmonary Thermodilution?

OBJECTIVES: Peripherally inserted central catheters are increasingly used in ICU as an alternative to centrally inserted central catheters for IV infusion. However, their reliability for hemodynamic measurements with transpulmonary thermodilution is currently unknown. We investigated the agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution measurements obtained with bolus injection through peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter (reference standard) using a transpulmonary thermodilution-calibrated Pulse Contour hemodynamic monitoring system (VolumeView/EV1000). DESIGN: Prospective method-comparison study. SETTING: Twenty-bed medical-surgical ICU of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty adult ICU patients who required hemodynamic monitoring because of hemodynamic instability and had both peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter in place. INTERVENTION: The hemodynamic measurements obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution after injection of a cold saline bolus via both centrally inserted central catheter and either a single-lumen 4F or a double-lumen 5F peripherally inserted central catheter using were compared. In order to rule out bias related to manual injection, measurements were repeated using an automated rapid injection system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 320 measurements were made. Cardiac index was significantly higher when measured with double-lumen 5F peripherally inserted central catheter than with centrally inserted central catheter (mean, 4.5 vs 3.3 L/min/m; p < 0.0001; bias, 1.24 L/min/m [0.27, 2.22 L/min/m]; bias percentage, 31%). Global end-diastolic index, extravascular lung water index, and stroke volume index were also overestimated (853 ± 240 vs 688 ± 175 mL/m, 12.2 ± 4.2 vs 9.4 ± 2.9 mL/kg, and 49.6 ± 14.9 vs 39.5 ± 9.6 mL/m, respectively; p < 0.0001). Lower, albeit significant differences were found using single-lumen 4F peripherally inserted central catheter (mean cardiac index, 4.2 vs 3.7 L/min/m; p = 0.043; bias, 0.51 L/min/m [-0.53, 1.55 L/min/m]; bias percentage, 12.7%). All differences were confirmed, even after standardization of bolus speed with automated injection. CONCLUSIONS: Bolus injection through peripherally inserted central catheter for transpulmonary thermodilution using EV1000 led to a significant overestimation of cardiac index, global end-diastolic index, extravascular lung water index, and stroke volume index, especially when double-lumen 5F peripherally inserted central catheter was used (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03834675).

Utility of transpulmonary thermodilution with Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output system for hemodynamic assessment in a hemodialysis patient with arteriovenous fistula and continuous renal replacement therapy: A case report.

Close hemodynamic monitoring is crucial for the patients to guide cardiovascular therapy for the optimal management. Transpulmonary thermodilution offers a less invasive hemodynamic monitoring with Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output system analysis. Intracardiac shunts have been associated with well-defined alterations in transpulmonary thermodilution-related hemodynamic parameters leading to inaccurate measurements and therefore are among the contraindications for transpulmonary thermodilution. However, data on the effects of arteriovenous fistulas as well as extracorporeal circuits on the thermodilution curves remain limited and inconclusive. Herein, we report generation of modified thermodilution curve forms leading to incorrect calculation of thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters by Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output system in a female patient in the presence of Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration and a high flow arteriovenous fistula. Our findings revealed generation of modified thermodilution curves and unacceptably high extravascular lung water readings by Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output system. This seems consistent with early recirculation of cold indicator in case of a peripheral shunt emphasizing the potential impact of high flow arteriovenous fistula on reliability of transpulmonary thermodilution measurements in critically ill patients, limiting the use of Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output system in these conditions.