Use of the Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew ('HINTS') assessment to aid differential diagnosis in acute vestibular syndrome in the hyperacute stroke setting.

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of acute vertigo syndrome is challenging given the similarities between clinical presentations of posterior circulation stroke and peripheral vestibular dysfunction. The Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew ('HINTS') assessment is a clinical bedside test used to aid diagnosis. METHODS: Comprehensive training on use of the Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew assessment was provided to one stroke consultant, and the effectiveness of the test in that setting was assessed. Further education was completed with more members of the stroke and emergency department multi-disciplinary team. Quality improvement measures including magnetic resonance imaging use and bed utilisation were explored. RESULTS: Following training of one stroke consultant, the Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew assessment was found to be a feasible, accurate bedside test within this acute stroke service. Further training for the multi-disciplinary team was completed, but outcome measures were not explored because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and maternity leave. CONCLUSION: There is a role for trained members of the multi-disciplinary team to successfully use the Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew assessment in hyperacute stroke settings, to aid diagnosis in acute vertigo syndrome.

Vestibular function assessment in Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) can cause acute damage not only to the auditory function, but also to the vestibular function in addition to damage to the hearing function. The aim of this study was to perform vestibular assessment using caloric test and video head impulse test in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In addition, to evaluate the relationship of dizziness with vestibular tests and post-treatment responses of vestibular tests. METHODS: This is an observational, longitudinal and prospective study, including patients diagnosed with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of vestibular complaints at presentation: Group 1: Patients with vestibular complaints, Group 2: Patients without vestibular complaints. All subjects underwent pure tone audiometry (PTA) testing, cold caloric test and video head impulse test (vHIT) during their admission and on the 10th day, 3rd month, and 1st year of their follow-up outpatient clinic controls. A unilateral weakness (UW) in the caloric test response was quantified according to the Jongkees formula. RESULTS: A positive and significant relationship was found between the degree of hearing loss according to the ASHA criteria pre-treatment and the level of improvement created according to Siegel criteria at the 10th day, 3rd month, 1st year after treatment (respectively p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001). When both short-term and long-term results were evaluated after treatment, a positive improvement in the degree of hearing loss was observed. A statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 when the pre-treatment, at 10 days, 3 months and 1 year after treatment the caloric test UW value was compared (respectively p = 0.020, p = 0.004, p = 0.004, p = 0.004). A statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 when the pre-treatment, at 10 days, 3 months and 1 year after treatment vHIT lateral canal VOR value was compared (respectively p = 0.000, p = 0.001, p = 0.000, p = 0.004). When both short-term and long-term results were evaluated after treatment, a positive improvement was observed in both caloric test results and lateral vHIT VOR values. Pre-treatment, post-treatment 10th day, 3rd month, 1st year vHIT anterior and posterior canal VOR values were found to be VOR˃0.8 in all patients. No difference was observed in anterior and posterior canal VOR values. CONCLUSION: Vertigo in patients with ISSHL "as objectively confirmed through caloric testing and vHIT" can be considered a sign of severe cochlear damage. Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of vestibular affect in patients with ISSHL, especially in the presence of vertigo. Thus, we conclude that the focus in ISSHL should not only be on the cochlea but also on the vestibular system.

Assessment of the Clinical Use of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and the Video Head Impulse Test in the Diagnosis of Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the usefulness of vestibular tests including "vestibular evoked myogenic potentials" (VEMPs) and the video head impulse test (vHIT) in the early diagnosis of "idiopathic Parkinson's disease" (PD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 80 participants including 40 patients (24 males, 16 females; age average 63.20 ± 7.94 years) with PD and 40 healthy individuals (18 males and 22 females; age average of 60.36 ± 7.68 years). The Modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale was used to measure how Parkinson's symptoms progress and the level of disability. Patients with PD underwent cVEMPs, oVEMPs, and vHIT and the results were compared with those of 40 age-matched healthy control (HC) subjects. vHIT results and VEMP responses were registered in all patients and HCs. RESULTS: One-sided absent cVEMP responses were found in 6 (15%) patients with PD and 8 (20%) patients had bilaterally absent responses. Five (12.5%) patients had 1-sided absent oVEMP responses and it was bilateral in 6 (15%). Patients with PD had significantly shorter cVEMP P1, N1 latency, lower cVEMP amplitudes, and oVEMP amplitudes than the HC group. The cVEMP and oVEMP amplitude asymmetry ratio was significantly higher in the PD group (P < .05). Evaluation of vHIT results and vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain between the groups revealed that anterior canal and posterior canal VOR gains results were remarkably lower in the PD group than in the HCs (P < .05). There was no difference in right and left lateral canal VOR gains between the groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that cVEMP and vHIT can be used to evaluate the vestibular system in patients with early-stage Parkinson's disease.

Pediatric Vestibular Assessment: Clinical Framework.

OBJECTIVES: Although vestibular deficits can have severe repercussions on the early motor development in children, vestibular assessment in young children has not yet been routinely integrated in clinical practice and clear diagnostic criteria to detect early vestibular deficits are lacking. In young children, specific adjustments of the test protocol are needed, and normative data are age-dependent as the vestibular pathways mature through childhood. Therefore, this study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of an extensive age-dependent vestibular test battery, to provide pediatric normative data with the concurrent age trends, and to offer a clinical framework for pediatric vestibular testing. DESIGN: This normative study included 133 healthy children below the age of 4 years (mean: 22 mo, standard deviation: 12.3 mo, range: 5-47 mo) without history of hearing loss or vestibular symptoms. Children were divided into four age categories: 38 children younger than 1 year old, 37 one-year olds, 33 two-year olds, and 25 three-year olds. Children younger than 3 years of age were examined with the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) of the horizontal semicircular canals, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) with bone conduction stimuli, and the rotatory test at 0.16, 0.04, and 0.01 Hz. In 3-year old children, the vHIT of the vertical semicircular canals and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) using a minishaker were added to the protocol. RESULTS: The horizontal vHIT appeared to be the most feasible test across age categories, except for children younger than 1-year old in which the success rate was the highest for the cVEMP. Success rates of the rotatory test varied the most across age categories. Age trends were found for the vHIT as the mean vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain increased significantly with age (r = 0.446, p < 0.001). Concerning the cVEMP, a significant increase with age was found for latency P1 (r = 0.420, p < 0.001), rectified interpeak amplitude P1-N1 (r = 0.574, p < 0.001), and averaged electromyographic (EMG) activity (r = 0.430, p < 0.001), whereas age trends for the latency N1 were less pronounced (r = 0.264, p = 0.004). Overall, the response parameters of the rotatory test did not show significant age effects ( p > 0.01), except for the phase at 0.01 Hz (r = 0.578, p < 0.001). Based on the reported success rates and age-dependent normative vestibular data, straightforward cutoff criteria were proposed (vHIT VOR gain < 0.7, cVEMP rectified interpeak amplitude < 1.3, oVEMP interpeak amplitude < 10 µV) with accompanying clinical recommendations to diagnose early vestibular impairment. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of typically developing children below the age of 4 years, the vHIT and cVEMP were the most feasible vestibular tests. Moreover, the age-dependent normative vestibular data could specify age trends in this group of young children. Finally, based on the current results and clinical experience of more than ten years at the Ghent University Hospital (Belgium), a clinical framework to diagnose early vestibular deficits in young patients is proposed.

Vestibular function assessment of Susac syndrome patients by the video head impulse test and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse and the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS. METHODS: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cVEMPs and the vHIT. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients' vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

The feasibility, validity and reliability of a child friendly vestibular assessment in infants and children candidates to cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVES: The pediatric vestibular assessment has developed significantly in the past two decades, especially in terms of assessment of cochlear implant (CI) candidates. Different methods and test protocols have been applied, however without a general consensus. We present here the feasibility, validity and reliability of a child friendly vestibular testing in use at our department for the assessment of pediatric CI candidates. METHODS: The test battery consisted of head impulse test (HIT), video head impulse test (vHIT), cervical evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and mini ice water caloric test (mIWC), all adapted from previous methods, mentioned in literature. We defined specific criteria for test feasibility, for test validity and test positivity (i.e. indicating vestibular insufficiency). The reliability of the whole protocol was assessed with test agreement analysis. RESULTS: Complete data from 35 children, all CI candidates, age ranging 4-79 months (67% under 2 years) and recruited over two years, were obtained. All but one child could complete at least one test with valid responses bilaterally, with the best compliance for HIT (97,1%) and least for cVEMP (68,6%). Feasibility did not appear to be affected by age or hearing loss etiology. Among the valid responses there was a substantial test agreement between HIT and vHIT, moderate agreement between vHIT/HIT and mIWC and no apparent agreement between the canal tests and cVEMP. Simple clinical guidelines were introduced to solve the tests' disagreement and to improve the protocol reliability: a) a pathological response had to be confirmed in at least two different canal tests and in at least three cVEMP trials; b) a canal/otolith disagreement was interpreted as a partial vestibular loss to be opposed to a complete vestibular insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The search for vestibular insufficiency in infants and young children can be attained with an opportunely adapted vestibular assessment, such the test battery proposed here. That assessment resulted easy to conduct and to interpret in a representative sample of CI candidates in preschool age, the most of whom were younger than 2 years. This method appears to particularly suit the demands of a vestibular assessment in young children CI candidates.

Assessment of Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Gain and Catch-up Saccades During Vestibular Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, in patients referred to vestibular rehabilitation (VR) for persistence of disability after acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUV), whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can be a useful technique to define the efficacy of the treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary academic referral hospitals. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with residual symptoms after AUV were included. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent a 10-week VR program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of dizziness handicap inventory score, high-velocity vestibulo-ocular reflex gain, asymmetry index, and catch-up saccade parameters before and after VR. RESULTS: All patients reported a clear clinical improvement after VR, also demonstrated by better dizziness handicap inventory scores (p < 0.001). A consistent increased gain and decreased asymmetry index were also observed (p < 0.001 for both). Patients did not show any change in covert catch-up saccades, while a statistically significant reduction of the number and amplitude of the overt catch-up saccades was interestingly detected (p = 0.009 and p = 0.030, respectively). CONCLUSION: VR is a valid approach for patients with residual disability after AUV. A reduction in number and amplitude of overt catch-up saccades seems useful to evaluate the efficacy of VR and to be related to clinical improvement.

Assessment of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video head impulse test in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with or without polyneuropathy.

This study aimed to compare cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) and video head impulse test (vHIT) results between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) or diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and healthy controls to determine vestibular end-organ pathologies. The participants in the present study consisted of three groups: the type 2 DM group (n = 33 patients), the DPN group (n = 33 patients), and the age- and sex-matched control group (n = 35). Cervical VEMP, oVEMP and vHIT were performed for each participant in the study and test results were compared between the groups. Peak-to-peak amplitudes of cVEMP (p13-n21) and oVEMP (n10-p15) were significantly lower in the DM and DPN groups than the control group. The values of vHIT were not statistically different between the groups. To our knowledge, the present study is the first report investigating oVEMP and cVEMP responses combined with vHIT findings in patients with DM and DPN. Vestibular end-organ pathologies can be determined via clinical vestibular diagnostic tools in spite of prominent vestibular symptoms in patients with type 2 DM as well as patients with DPN.

Economic management of vertigo/dizziness disease in a county hospital: video-head-impulse test vs. caloric irrigation.

The video-head-impulse test (vHIT) is an important test for examining unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Alternatively, one can test for vestibular hypofunction with the caloric irrigation test. Various studies have shown that both tests may not always identify vestibular hypofunction; instead, the results of the tests might be contradictory. This retrospective study reproduces those finding in a much larger group of patients at a county hospital. 1063 patients were examined with the vHIT and bithermal caloric irrigation on the same day and analyzed with respect to side differences. Of those patients 13.3% had pathological vHIT and a caloric irrigation test, 4.6% a pathological vHIT only and 24.1% a pathologic caloric test only. As both tests might be necessary, we calculated the optimal sequence of the two examinations based on savings in time for the different disease groups. Especially in vestibular failure using the vHIT first and only applying the caloric irrigation in case of an unremarkable vHIT saves time and optimizes the diagnostic work up. In contrast, in Menière's disease and vestibular migraine testing caloric irrigation first might be more efficient.

Reading while moving: the functional assessment of VOR.

The head impulse test (HIT) is nowadays recognized as the gold standard for clinical testing of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). By imposing unpredictable, abrupt head rotations in canal pairs' planes it aims at unveiling the dysfunction of the semicircular canal towards which the head is rotated based on Ewald's II law. Functional testing of the VOR aims at assessing the ability of the reflex to stabilize gaze in space and thus allow clear vision during head movements. The HIT device (HITD) approach exploits impulsive head rotations spawning a range of angular accelerations while requiring subjects to identify optotypes briefly displayed on a screen. Here we also recorded eye movements, so that the evaluation of the individual subject is based both on the VOR gain and on the percentage of correct answers with respect to a population of controls. Here we used the HITD to study 14 patients suffering from vestibular neuritis and 7 of those were re-tested after three months. We found that the HITD was able to unveil the ipsilesional deficit and the contralesional impairment, together with the improvement in the follow-up test.

Evaluación de la función vestibular angular: prueba de impulso cefálico multiaxial a ojo desnudo / Angular vestibular function assessment: Multiaxial Head Impulse Test

Introducción: La prueba de impulso cefálico consiste en un examen rápido, sencillo para evaluar la función vestibular angular. Clásicamente se utiliza para el canal horizontal, pero puede implementarse para evaluar los canales semicirculares anteriores y posteriores. Objetivo: Explorar la sensibilidad y especificidad de esta prueba para los canales verticales a ojo desnudo en nuestro medio, en relación a la prueba calórica. Material y método: Estudio prospectivo de evaluación de test diagnóstico. Se realizó prueba de impulso cefálico para todos los canales semicirculares a pacientes con indicación de evaluación funcional de VIII par. Resultados: Se evaluaron 118 pacientes, donde 49,2% presentó una prueba calórica clásica alterada. La sensibilidad del impulso cefálico para el canal posterior fue 13,1(0)% (y 3,2%% para el canal anterior) con una especificidad de 100%% para ambos. Para el canal horizontal la sensibilidad fue de 63,9%% y la especificidad de 100%%. Discusión: La prueba de impulso cefálico para los canales anteriores y posteriores a ojo desnudo es altamente específico, pero muy poco sensible, teniendo una utilidad relativa dentro de la clínica, a diferencia de la misma prueba para el canal horizontal que con la misma especificidad pero con una sensibilidad aceptable representa un examen rápido y de simple ejecución.

Introduction: The Head Impulse Head test represents a quick and simple technique for perioheral vestibular function assessment, by means of exploring the vestíbulo-ocular reflex. It is usually períormed on the horizontal semicircular canals planes, but it can also explore the anterior and posterior canals. Aim: To assess the head impulse test's sensitivity and specificity for the anterior and posterior canals on a bedside scenario, taking the classic caloric test as gold standard. Material and method: Prospective test-assessment study. A head impulse test for every semicircular canal was períormed on patients with indication of vestibular study with caloric test. Results: 118 patients were evaluated, where 49,2%% presente an abnormal caloric test. The head impulse test's sensitivity for the posterior canal canal was 13,1%% (3,2%% for the anterior canal). The test's specificity was 100%% for both vertical canals. On the horizontal plane, sensitivity reached 63,9%%, while specificity was 100%% Discussion: The head impulse test for vertical (anterior and posterior) canal on a bedside scenario is highly specific but poorly sensitive, thus having a relatively low clinical utility. On the contrary the test for the horizontal canal remains a quick and simple tool, with acceptable sensitivy and great sensitivity for assessing vestibular function loss.