[Role of point-by-point light sensitivity in the assessment of glaucoma progression]. / Rol' potochechnoi svetochuvstvitel'nosti v otsenke progressirovaniya glaukomy.

PURPOSE: This study analyzes changes in light sensitivity in each test point of the visual field in patients with different stages of glaucoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of a prospective analytical case-control study were analyzed. All patients underwent assessment of retinal light sensitivity and its variability in 54 points corresponding to the 24-2 program. Mean light sensitivity values were calculated in each point. Intergroup analysis was performed to evaluate changes in light sensitivity in each point. RESULTS: The range of light sensitivity decrease in the early glaucoma group compared to the control group was from 1.5 to 3.6 dB. The range of light sensitivity decrease in the moderate glaucoma group compared to the control group was from 2.1 to 11.5 dB, and compared to the early glaucoma group - from -0.9 to 7.9 dB. The most frequent decrease in light sensitivity was detected in the nasal sector and along the horizontal line in the upper half of the visual field. This trend persisted within the central 10 degrees of the visual field. The range of light sensitivity decrease in the advanced glaucoma group compared to the control group was from 14.1 to 28.0 dB, and compared to the early glaucoma group - from 11.35 to 26.08 dB, compared to the moderate glaucoma group - from 9.1 to 23.5 dB. The most frequent and severe decrease in light sensitivity was detected in the paracentral zone in the lower half of the visual field. CONCLUSION: The study analyzed the trends in the development of glaucoma from the early to the advanced stage. The most frequent and severe defect in light sensitivity in cases of verified advanced glaucoma was found in the lower half of the visual field. Points No. 32, 33 and 40 can be indicated as the area of interest in assessing the progression of glaucoma, as they were found to have the most profound changes in light sensitivity as glaucoma progressed.

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography.

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance and structure-function association of retinal retardance (RR), a customized metric measured by a prototype polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT), across various stages of glaucoma. Methods: This cross-sectional pilot study analyzed 170 eyes from 49 healthy individuals and 68 patients with glaucoma. The patients underwent PS-OCT imaging and conventional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), as well as visual field (VF) tests. Parameters including RR and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) were extracted from identical circumpapillary regions of the fundus. Glaucomatous eyes were categorized into early, moderate, or severe stages based on VF mean deviation (MD). The diagnostic performance of RR and RNFLT in discriminating glaucoma from controls was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Correlations among VF-MD, RR, and RNFLT were evaluated and compared within different groups of disease severity. Results: The diagnostic performance of both RR and RNFLT was comparable for glaucoma detection (RR AUC = 0.98, RNFLT AUC = 0.97; P = 0.553). RR showed better structure-function association with VF-MD than RNFLT (RR VF-MD = 0.68, RNFLT VF-MD = 0.58; z = 1.99; P = 0.047) in glaucoma cases, especially in severe glaucoma, where the correlation between VF-MD and RR (r = 0.73) was significantly stronger than with RNFLT (r = 0.43, z = 1.96, P = 0.050). In eyes with early and moderate glaucoma, the structure-function association was similar when using RNFLT and RR. Conclusions: RR and RNFLT have similar performance in glaucoma diagnosis. However, in patients with glaucoma especially severe glaucoma, RR showed a stronger correlation with VF test results. Further research is needed to validate RR as an indicator for severe glaucoma evaluation and to explore the benefits of using PS-OCT in clinical practice. Translational Relevance: We demonstrated that PS-OCT has the potential to evaluate the status of RNFL structural damage in eyes with severe glaucoma, which is currently challenging in clinics.

Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment.

Purpose: Compare estimated sensitivities of SITA-Standard to the RATA-Standard algorithm of the Radius virtual reality perimeter (VRP), and measure concordance in glaucoma staging. Methods: One hundred adult glaucoma patients-half with suspect or mild glaucoma, and half with moderate or severe-from five clinics performed four 24-2 visual field tests during a single visit, two with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and two with Radius, in randomized order: HRHR or RHRH. Only one eye was tested per participant. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni correction to compare distributions of estimated sensitivities across all 54 test locations over the 15 to 40 dB measurement range of the Radius. Weighted kappa measured concordance in glaucoma staging between two masked glaucoma experts using Medicare definitions of severity. Results: A total of 62 OD and 38 OS eyes were tested. Estimated sensitivities for SITA-Standard and RATA-Standard were not significantly different for OD, but were for OS-likely because of SITA-Standard OD and OS being significantly different in our sample, but not for RATA-Standard. Low agreement was observed between 15 to 22 dB. Concordance in glaucoma staging was high for both graders: kappa = 0.91 and kappa = 0.93. Average test duration was 298 seconds for RATA-Standard and 341 seconds for SITA-Standard. The correlation in mean deviation was 0.94. Conclusions: Estimated sensitivities of RATA-Standard are comparable to SITA-Standard between 23 to 40 dB with high concordance in glaucoma staging. Translational Relevance: Radius VRP is statistically noninferior to HFA when staging glaucoma using Medicare definitions.

Case Report: Macula Structural and Functional Assessment in Nab-Paclitaxel-Related Cystoid Macular Edema.

Nab-paclitaxel-related cystoid macular edema is a rare ophthalmic adverse drug reaction. We present a 54-year-old woman with metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative breast carcinoma who developed profound bilateral vision loss after the seventh cycle of nab-paclitaxel treatment. Optical coherence tomography and macula microperimetry demonstrated macular edema and decreased threshold sensitivity, respectively. Cessation of nab-paclitaxel improved structural and functional vision after 4 weeks. The introduction of topical dorzolamide 1% in one eye demonstrated further rapid resolution of edema. We demonstrate the objective and subjective visual changes and recovery of nab-paclitaxel-related cystoid macular edema. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:408-411.].

Inter and intradevice assessment of microperimetry testing in aging eyes.

Microperimetry (MP) is a psychometric examination combining retinal imaging and functional sensitivity testing with an increasing importance due to its potential use as clinical study outcome. We investigated the repeatability of pointwise retinal sensitivity (PWS) on the most advanced commercially available MP devices under their standard setting in a healthy aging population. Two successive MP examinations on both MP-3 (NIDEK CO., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) and MAIA (CenterVue S.p.A. (iCare), Padova, Italy) were performed on healthy aging subjects in a randomized order. PWS repeatability was analysed for different macular regions and age groups using Bland-Altmann coefficients of repeatability (CoR). A total of 3600 stimuli from 20 healthy individuals with a mean age of 70 (11) years were included. Mean CoR in dB were ±4.61 for MAIA and ±4.55 for MP-3 examinations. A lower repeatability (p=0.005) was detected in the central millimetre on MAIA examinations. Higher subject age was associated with a lower repeatability of PWS on both devices (both p=0.003). Intra-device correlation was good (MAIA: 0.79 [0.76-0.81]; MP-3: 0.72 [0.68-0.76]) whereas a moderate mean inter-device correlation (0.6 [0.55-0.65]) could be detected. In conclusion, older subjects and the foveal region are associated with a worse pointwise repeatability.

Assessment of Remote Training, At-Home Testing, and Test-Retest Variability of a Novel Test for Clustered Virtual Reality Perimetry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of remotely training glaucoma patients to take a 10-session clustered virtual reality (VR) visual field (VF) test (Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10]) at home, analyze results for test-retest variability, and assess correspondence with conventional perimetry. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one subjects with glaucoma were enrolled and included in the feasibility assessment of remote training. Thirty-six eyes were used for test-retest analysis and determination of concordance with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). METHODS: Subjects were provided with a mobile VR headset containing the VVP-10 test software and trained remotely via video conferencing. Subjects were instructed to complete 10 sessions over a 14-day period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was determined by the number of subjects who were able to independently complete VVP-10 over the 14-day period after 1 remote training session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for average fraction seen across 10 sessions and the standard error (SE) of the mean were primary outcome measures for assessing test-retest variability. Correlation with HFA mean sensitivity (MS) across eyes, was a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: Twenty subjects (95%) successfully completed the VVP-10 test series after 1 training session. The ICC for VVP-10 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97). The mean SE in units of fraction seen was 0.012. The Spearman correlations between VVP-10 average fraction seen and HFA MS were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-0.98) for moderate-to-advanced glaucoma eyes, and decreased to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.28-0.94) when all eyes were included. CONCLUSIONS: Remote training of patients at home is feasible, and subsequent remote clustered VF testing using VVP-10 by patients on their own, without any further interactions with caregivers or study staff, was possible. At-home VVP-10 results demonstrated low test-retest variability. Future studies must be conducted to determine if VVP-10, taken at home as convenient for the patient, may be a viable supplement to provide equivalent or complementary results to that of standard in-clinic assessment of visual function in glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

AI-based clinical assessment of optic nerve head robustness superseding biomechanical testing.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To use artificial intelligence (AI) to: (1) exploit biomechanical knowledge of the optic nerve head (ONH) from a relatively large population; (2) assess ONH robustness (ie, sensitivity of the ONH to changes in intraocular pressure (IOP)) from a single optical coherence tomography (OCT) volume scan of the ONH without the need for biomechanical testing and (3) identify what critical three-dimensional (3D) structural features dictate ONH robustness. METHODS: 316 subjects had their ONHs imaged with OCT before and after acute IOP elevation through ophthalmo-dynamometry. IOP-induced lamina cribrosa (LC) deformations were then mapped in 3D and used to classify ONHs. Those with an average effective LC strain superior to 4% were considered fragile, while those with a strain inferior to 4% robust. Learning from these data, we compared three AI algorithms to predict ONH robustness strictly from a baseline (undeformed) OCT volume: (1) a random forest classifier; (2) an autoencoder and (3) a dynamic graph convolutional neural network (DGCNN). The latter algorithm also allowed us to identify what critical 3D structural features make a given ONH robust. RESULTS: All three methods were able to predict ONH robustness from a single OCT volume scan alone and without the need to perform biomechanical testing. The DGCNN (area under the curve (AUC): 0.76±0.08) outperformed the autoencoder (AUC: 0.72±0.09) and the random forest classifier (AUC: 0.69±0.05). Interestingly, to assess ONH robustness, the DGCNN mainly used information from the scleral canal and the LC insertion sites. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an AI-driven approach that can assess the robustness of a given ONH solely from a single OCT volume scan of the ONH, and without the need to perform biomechanical testing. Longitudinal studies should establish whether ONH robustness could help us identify fast visual field loss progressors. PRECIS: Using geometric deep learning, we can assess optic nerve head robustness (ie, sensitivity to a change in IOP) from a standard OCT scan that might help to identify fast visual field loss progressors.

Short-term Detection of Fast Progressors in Glaucoma: The Fast Progression Assessment through Clustered Evaluation (Fast-PACE) Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of an intensive, clustered testing approach in identifying eyes with rapid glaucoma progression over 6 months in the Fast Progression Assessment through Clustered Evaluation (Fast-PACE) Study. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 125 eyes from 65 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects. METHODS: Subjects underwent 2 sets of 5 weekly visits (clusters) separated by an average of 6 months and then were followed with single visits every 6 months for an overall mean follow-up of 25 months (mean of 17 tests). Each visit consisted of testing with standard automated perimetry (SAP) 24-2 and 10-2, and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). Progression was assessed using trend analyses of SAP mean deviation (MD) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Generalized estimating equations were applied to adjust for correlations between eyes for confidence interval (CI) estimation and hypothesis testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy of the 6-month clustering period to identify progression detected during the overall follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 19 of 125 eyes (15%, CI, 9%-24%) progressed based on SAP 24-2 MD over the 6-month clustering period. A total of 14 eyes (11%, CI, 6%-20%) progressed on SAP 10-2 MD, and 16 eyes (13%, CI, 8%-21%) progressed by RNFL thickness, with 30 of 125 eyes (24%, CI, 16%-34%) progressing by function, structure, or both. Of the 35 eyes progressing during the overall follow-up, 25 had progressed during the 6-month clustering period, for a sensitivity of 71% (CI, 53%-85%). Of the 90 eyes that did not progress during the overall follow-up, 85 also did not progress during the 6-month period, for a specificity of 94% (CI, 88%-98%). Of the 14 eyes considered fast progressors by SAP 24-2, SAP 10-2, or SD-OCT during the overall follow-up, 13 were identified as progressing during the 6-month cluster period, for a sensitivity of 93% (CI, 66%-100%) for identifying fast progression with a specificity of 85% (CI, 77%-90%). CONCLUSIONS: Clustered testing in the Fast-PACE Study detected fast-progressing glaucoma eyes over 6 months. The methodology could be applied in clinical trials investigating interventions to slow glaucoma progression and may be of value for short-term assessment of high-risk subjects. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

[Static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Assessment of disease progression]. / Staticheskaya perimetriya v diagnostike glaukomy. Sposoby otsenki progressirovaniya.

There are several ways to assess glaucoma progression using standard automated perimetry. Most often, ophthalmologists evaluate the stability of visual functions manually when comparing several study protocols. The advantages of clinical assessment are ease of implementation and the ability to interpret data from any device. The main disadvantage of this method is its subjectivity. There are many available automated methods for assessing disease progression involving Humphrey Field Analyzer and Octopus perimeters. Event analysis allows determining glaucoma progression at the time of examination, with consideration of the possible physiological fluctuations in light sensitivity. Trend analysis of perimetric indices makes it possible to assess the rate of glaucoma progression and forecast the trend of changes in visual functions over the next five years. All these methods for assessing progression have certain advantages and disadvantages and cannot be considered ideal. Pointwise and cluster trend analysis are more sensitive in early glaucoma and are being actively researched and developed. These methods have great potential, although they are not yet sufficiently available in clinical practice.

Test-Retest Variability and Discriminatory Power of Measurements From Microperimetry and Dark Adaptation Assessment in People With Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration - A MACUSTAR Study Report.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess test-retest variability and discriminatory power of measures from macular integrity assessment (S-MAIA) and AdaptDx. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 167 people with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD), no AMD (controls; n = 54), early AMD (n = 28), and late AMD (n = 41), recruited across 18 European ophthalmology centers. Repeat measures of mesopic and scotopic S-MAIA average (mean) threshold (MMAT decibels [dB] and SMAT [dB]) and rod intercept time (RIT [mins]) at 2 visits 14 (±7) days apart were recorded. Repeat measures were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and variability ratios. Secondary analysis assessed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) to determine the ability to distinguish people as having no AMD, early AMD, or iAMD. Results: Data were available for 128, 131, and 103 iAMD participants for the mesopic and scotopic S-MAIA and AdaptDx, respectively. MMAT and SMAT demonstrate similar test-retest variability in iAMD (95% confidence interval [CI] ICC of 0.79-0.89 and 0.78-0.89, respectively). ICCs were worse in RIT (95% CI ICC = 0.55-0.77). All tests had equivalent AUCs (approximately 70%) distinguishing between subjects with iAMD and controls, whereas early AMD was indistinguishable from iAMD on all measures (AUC = <55%). A learning effect was not seen in these assessments under the operating procedures used. Conclusions: MMAT, SMAT, and RIT have adequate test-retest variability and are all moderately good at separating people with iAMD from controls. Translational Relevance: Expected levels of test-retest variability and discriminatory power of the AdaptDx and MAIA devices in a clinical study setting must be considered when designing future trials for people with AMD.

[Assessment of a pupillometric method for the screening of glaucoma]. / Évaluation d'une méthode pupillométrique pour la détection du glaucome.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy, remaining asymptomatic for a long time, which makes its early diagnosis difficult. Visual field testing is still the gold standard but is less than ideal. The goal of this study is to assess a pupillometric test, administered passively to the subject for one minute, to measure its sensitivity and specificity in the classification of healthy eyes and glaucomatous eyes, and to evaluate its tolerability compared to visual field testing. METHODS: Forty-five participants were included in this single-center, interventional, prospective study. They underwent 3 monocular pupillometric tests with light stimulation: 6 pupillary responses were recorded during full-field multifocal stimulation (performed twice) and pupillary hippus cycle study. RESULTS: Analysis of spectral power and pupillary measurements with full-field multifocal stimulation provides a 0.94 sensitivity and a 0.88 specificity, a virtually perfect discrimination for early stages of glaucoma. Analysis of pupil cycle time provides a 0.92 sensitivity and a 0.88 specificity for early stages. Acceptability of this test by patients is superior to visual field testing. CONCLUSION: These results show that data from our pupillometric recordings provide a good classification of healthy and glaucomatous eyes and must be confirmed on a larger population.

Frontloading SITA-Faster Can Increase Frequency and Reliability of Visual Field Testing at Minimal Time Cost.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of frontloaded visual field (VF) testing (2 tests per eye on the same visit) over 2 longitudinal, consecutive visits using SITA-Faster (SFR) in terms of global indices, reliability metrics, and test duration. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: A total of 902 eyes of 463 subjects with normal, suspect, or manifest glaucoma. METHODS: Two intravisit SFR VF tests (T1 and T2) per eye at an initial (Ti) and follow-up (Tf) visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra- and intervisit global indices, reliability metrics, and test durations. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 63.6 years, and 58.3% were male. Seven hundred ninety eyes (87.4%) had a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspicion. The mean duration between visits was 265.0 (standard deviation 98.8) days. In total, 3608 VF tests were analyzed, with the correlation of mean deviation (MD) values of the frontloaded tests at each visit high (T1/T2 MD correlation at initial visit r = 0.83, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 1.26, follow-up visit r = 0.83, RMSE = 1.25, P < 0.0001) and greater than the correlation of MD between visits (Ti1/Tf1 MD correlation r = 0.72, RMSE = 1.31). There was a significant intra-visit decrease in rates of abnormally high sensitivity in the glaucoma hemifield test (3.2% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.0023) and rates of unreliable test results (15.4% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.002) from T1 to T2 in both visits, with a corresponding significant decrease in MD (-1.28 dB vs. -1.68 dB, P < 0.0001) and VF index (P = 0.03). The mean duration of each SFR test was 132.6 (SD 27.2) seconds. CONCLUSIONS: Frontloading VFs using SFR produced sets of repeatable perimetric data with significant improvement of reliability indices from the first to second test. This may help increase testing frequency at minimal time cost to meet recommended guidelines and for evaluating patients prone to high variability. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Structure-function assessment in glaucoma based on perimetric sensitivity and en face optical coherence tomography images of retinal nerve fiber bundles.

Many studies have assessed structure-function relations in glaucoma, but most without topographical comparison across the central 30°. We present a method for assessing structure-function relations with en face images of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) bundles allowing topographical comparison across much of this retinal area. Forty-four patients with glaucoma (median age 61 years) were recruited and tested with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and perimetry. Six rectangular volume scans were gathered, and then montaged to provide en face views of the RNFL bundles. We calculated the proportion of locations showing a perimetric defect that also showed an en face RNFL defect; and the proportion of locations falling on an RNFL defect that also showed a perimetric defect. A perimetric defect for a location was defined as a total deviation (TD) value equal to or deeper than -4 dB. We found that the median (IQR) number of locations with abnormal RNFL bundle reflectance that also had abnormal TD was 78% (60%) and for locations with abnormal TD that also had abnormal RNFL bundle reflectance was 75% (44%). We demonstrated a potential approach for structure-function assessment in glaucoma by presenting a topographic reflectance map, confirming results of previous studies and including larger retinal regions.

Teleglaucoma Using a New Smartphone-Based Tool for Visual Field Assessment.

PRCIS: COVID-19 underlines the importance of telemedical diagnostics. The smartphone-based campimetry (Sb-C) is a newly developed digital application allowing visual field testing using a head-mounted device and a smartphone. It enables visual field screening remotely from a clinic. BACKGROUND: Sb-C is a newly developed tool for functional ophthalmic diagnosis. This study aimed to examine the comparability of the Sb-C and Octopus 900 to ensure ophthalmological care in times of social distancing. METHODS: Total 93 eyes were included in the study. After an ophthalmological examination, the visual field was tested by the Octopus program G1 and by the smartphone-based campimeter. The Sb-C was performed using VR glasses and an iPhone 6. The software Sb-C was downloaded and installed as SmartCampiTracker app and is examining the 30-degree visual field with 59 test positions corresponding to the G pattern of Octopus G1. Sensitivities were recorded and saved on the app. In addition, test-retest reliability was tested on 6 ophthalmologically healthy participants. RESULTS: The group comprised 48 women and 45 men (mean age: 62.52±12.2 y) including 19 controls, 17 patients with ocular hypertension, 11 preperimetric glaucomas, and 46 perimetric glaucomas. The mean sensitivity (MS) of all points of G1 perimetry was 23.13 dB (95% CI, 22.08-24.18). The MS of the Sb-C was 21.23 dB (95% CI, 20.37-22.08). The correlation between the mean MS measured by G1 perimetry and the Sb-C was strong ( r =0.815, P <0.05). The test-retest reliability showed a correlation of r =0.591 ( P <0.05) . CONCLUSIONS: With some technical adjustments, the Sb-C shows promise for screening glaucoma and monitoring disease progression remotely from an ophthalmologic clinic.

Static Perimetry in the Rate of Progression in USH2A-related Retinal Degeneration (RUSH2A) Study: Assessment Through 2 Years.

PURPOSE: To evaluate disease progression using static perimetry (SP) in patients with USH2A-related retinal degeneration, including Usher syndrome type 2 (USH2) and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: A total of 102 patients with biallelic disease-causing sequence variants in USH2A with baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score ≥54 were recruited from 16 clinical sites in Europe and North America. SP, BCVA, full-field stimulus thresholds, spectral domain optical coherence tomography macular scans, and fundus-guided mesopic microperimetry were performed at baseline and annually. The main outcome measures were total hill of vision (VTOT), hill of vision in the central 30° (V30), VTOT minus V30 (VPERIPH), and mean sensitivity. RESULTS: The average decline (95% CI) was 2.05 (1.40, 2.70) decibel-steradian (dB-sr)/y for VTOT, 0.48 (0.32, 0.65) dB-sr/y for V30, 1.53 (0.97, 2.08) dB-sr/y for VPERIPH, and 0.55 (0.40, 0.71) dB/y for mean sensitivity. Average percentage decline per year was 8.3 (5.5, 11.1) for VTOT, 5.2 (3.0, 7.4) for V30, 16.0 (9.5, 22.0) for VPERIPH, and 5.1 (3.5, 6.7) for mean sensitivity. Changes from baseline to year 2 in all SP measures were highly correlated (r's ranging from 0.52 [V30 vs VPERIPH] to 0.98 [VTOT vs VPERIPH]). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of SP declined significantly over 2 years in USH2A-related retinal degeneration. The annual percentage rate of change was greatest for VTOT and VPERIPH, whereas V30 and mean sensitivity changed least, reflecting earlier and more severe peripheral degeneration compared with central loss.

Glaucoma suspects referred by general ophthalmologists to a tertiary center in Brazil: outcomes of the glaucoma specialist assessment.

PURPOSE: To characterize patients with suspected glaucoma who were referred to the clinic for suspected glaucoma in a tertiary public hospital in southern Brazil and to evaluate differences in functional and structural damages between patients diagnosed with different types of glaucoma, those with normal eye examination results, and those who remained as glaucoma suspects. METHODS: This is a cohort study of patients referred by general ophthalmologists to the clinic for suspected glaucoma at Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil, between March 2016 and December 2018. The patients were followed up until they had undergone reliable examinations (eye examination, visual field screening, and optic coherence tomography for classification as normal and having a suspected glaucoma, glaucoma with an elevated intraocular pressure, normotensive glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were included in this study. Of the patients, 117 subjects completed all examinations and met the inclusion criteria. Most patients were normal (36.8%), followed by those with suspected glaucoma (25.64%), normal tension glaucoma (18.8%), glaucoma with elevated intraocular pressure (12%), and ocular hypertensive (6%). The main reason for referral was increased optic nerve head cupping. The patients with normal tension glaucoma were older than the other subjects on average (p=0.03). In addition, the normal tension glaucoma group had a significantly worse baseline visual field index and mean deviation of the visual field than the normal, glaucoma suspect, and ocular hypertensive groups. The circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer on OCT was thinner on average in the normal tension glaucoma group than in the normal and glaucoma suspect groups (p<0.002) but did not significantly differ between the glaucoma group with elevated intraocular pressure and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with normal tension glaucoma tend to be diagnosed later because of their normal intraocular pressures; thus, the optic nerve cupping must be greater to raise the suspicion of glaucoma. In this study, we found that the patients with normal tension glaucoma had worse disease at the time of diagnosis.

Macular integrity assessment microperimeter, Humphrey field analyzer and OCT in glaucoma practice: a correlation study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and correlate retinal sensitivities measured with macular integrity assessment microperimetry (MAIA-MP) and Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 10-2 tests with structural parameters obtained from optical coherence tomography (OCT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension. METHODS: This study included 63 participants (22 with POAG, 20 with ocular hypertension, and 21 control individuals). All participants underwent HFA 10-2 and MAIA-MP (macular retinal sensitivity tests) and measurements for optic nerve head (ONH), peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (PRNFLT), and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT) using OCT. The relationship between macular retinal sensitivity and OCT parameters was evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression modelling. RESULTS: POAG cases had a strong association between the MAIA-MP and ONH parameters (optic disc area [ODA], p = 0.037; cup volume, p = 0.043), PRNFLT (average, p = 0.009; inferior PRNFLT, p = 0.004), and GCIPLT in all macula sectors (p ≤ 0.005 for all). HFA 10-2 had a moderate correlation with the ONH parameters (cup-to-disc ratio [CDR], p = 0.042; vertical CDR, p = 0.037; cup volume, p = 0.037; ODA, p = 0.014), PRNFLT (average, inferior, and nasal, p < 0.05 for all), and GCIPLT in all macula sectors (p < 0.005 for all). OHT cases had a weak correlation between HFA 10-2 and nasal and superior PRNFLTs (p = 0.035 and p = 0.047, respectively). CONCLUSION: MAIA-MP and HFA 10-2 functional parameters have strong correlations with the structural parameters obtained by OCT in POAG cases. Both devices are useful in assessing the central visual field in glaucoma, with MAIA-MP potentially beneficial in patients with limited cooperation or poor vision.

Assessment of visual field progression in glaucoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Perimetry plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. This article discusses the assessment of visual field progression in patients with glaucoma. RECENT FINDINGS: Selecting the best visual field test strategy and establishing a baseline of visual fields will assist clinicians in the detection of glaucomatous progression. Repeat testing serves to confirm or refute changes on visual field testing. More frequent testing after initial diagnosis is recommended to establish a baseline and to identify patients with rapid progression who may need more aggressive management. Statistically significant changes on event analysis can prompt examination of a patient's trend analysis to determine whether clinically significant deterioration may be occurring. Future applications of machine learning can complement existing methods of visual field interpretation. SUMMARY: Many treated patients with glaucoma will experience visual field progression. Optimal utilization of visual field testing strategy and analytical software can help clinicians identify patients with glaucomatous progression likely to cause functional visual disability.

Rapid, non-contact multifocal visual assessment in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous work on temporally sparse multifocal methods suggests that the results are correlated with disability and progression in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Here, we assess the diagnostic power of three cortically mediated sparse multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) methods that quantified response-delay and light-sensitivity at up to 44 regions of both visual fields concurrently. METHODS: One high-spatial-resolution mfPOP method, P129, and two rapid medium-resolution methods, W12 and W20, were tested on 44 PwMS and controls. W12 and W20 took 82 s to test both visual fields concurrently, providing response delay and sensitivity at each field location, while P129 took 7 min. Diagnostic power was assessed using areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves and effect-size (Hedges' g). Linear models examined significance. Concurrent testing of both eyes permitted assessment of between-eye asymmetries. RESULTS: Per-region response delays and asymmetries achieved AUROCs of 86.6% ± 4.72% (mean ± SE) in relapsing-remitting MS, and 96.5% ± 2.30% in progressive MS. Performance increased with increasing disability scores, with even moderate EDSS 2 to 4.5 PwMS producing AUROCs of 82.1 to 89.8%, Hedge's g values up to 2.06, and p = 4.0e - 13. All tests performed well regardless of any history of optic neuritis. W12 and W20 performed as well or better than P129. CONCLUSION: Overall, the 82-s tests (W12 and W20) performed better than P129. The results suggest that mfPOP assesses a correlate of disease severity rather than a history of inflammation, and that it may be useful in the clinical management of PwMS.

[The ground visual field assessment, using two methods, compared with Goldmann perimetry]. / Évaluation du champ visuel au sol, selon deux méthodes, comparée avec le champ visuel de Goldmann. Validation de l'évaluation du champ visuel au sol.

In visual rehabilitation, ground visual field assessment (GVFA) makes it possible to assess the size of scotomas in connection with locomotion and to restore the width of the patient's visual field (VF). The information obtained by these tests has never been compared with Goldmann testing. The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of VF measurement under different conditions (Goldmann perimetry, manual and automated GVFA). Ten patients (51.4±14.0 years, 4 men and 6 women) with tunnel fields inferior or equal to the central 25°, performed three different versions of a binocular VF assessment: Goldmann perimetry, manual GVFA, and automated GVFA. The two versions of the GVFA were performed at 1m then 5m from the patient on the ground, and finally 5m away from the patient at eye level, facing the patient. The main outcome was the total perceived surface for each test. The reproducibility of the measurement was average or good for the test at 1m (ICC=0.685 to 0.866). Conversely, it was very poor between the tests at 5m, except for the automated and manual GVFA at 5m on the ground (ICC=0.888). This study shows good reproducibility of the GVFA measurements at 1m with less reproducibility at 5m, which can be explained by difficulties in the execution of the GVFA. Among the tests, the automated GVFA appears to be more reliable than the manual GVFA and is preferred by patients.