RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research is to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of functional and anatomical strategies for diagnosing stable coronary artery disease (CAD), using exercise (Ex)-ECG, stress echocardiogram (ECHO), single-photon emission CT (SPECT), coronary CT angiography (CTA) or stress cardiacmagnetic resonance (C-MRI). SETTING: Decision-analytical model, comparing strategies of sequential tests for evaluating patients with possible stable angina in low, intermediate and high pretest probability of CAD, from the perspective of a developing nation's public healthcare system. PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical cohort of patients with pretest probability of CAD between 20% and 70%. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is cost per correct diagnosis of CAD. Proportion of false-positive or false-negative tests and number of unnecessary tests performed were also evaluated. RESULTS: Strategies using Ex-ECG as initial test were the least costly alternatives but generated more frequent false-positive initial tests and false-negative final diagnosis. Strategies based on CTA or ECHO as initial test were the most attractive and resulted in similar cost-effectiveness ratios (I$ 286 and I$ 305 per correct diagnosis, respectively). A strategy based on C-MRI was highly effective for diagnosing stable CAD, but its high cost resulted in unfavourable incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) in moderate-risk and high-risk scenarios. Non-invasive strategies based on SPECT have been dominated. CONCLUSIONS: An anatomical diagnostic strategy based on CTA is a cost-effective option for CAD diagnosis. Functional strategies performed equally well when based on ECHO. C-MRI yielded acceptable ICER only at low pretest probability, and SPECT was not cost-effective in our analysis.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca/economia , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Dor no Peito/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Teste de Esforço/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Saúde Pública , Brasil/epidemiologia , Dor no Peito/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Saúde Pública/economia , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine lifetime cost-effectiveness of diagnostic evaluation strategies for individuals with stable chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Exercise treadmill testing (ETT), stress echocardiography (SE), myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were assessed alone, or in succession to each other. RESULTS: Initial ETT followed by imaging wherein ETT was equivocal or unable to be performed appeared more cost-effective than any strategy employing initial testing by imaging. CONCLUSION: As pre-test likelihood of CAD varies, different modalities including SE, CCTA, and MPS result in improved costs and enhanced effectiveness.
Assuntos
Dor no Peito , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Análise Custo-Benefício , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Artérias , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor no Peito/economia , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Ecocardiografia/economia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Teste de Esforço/economia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/economia , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/métodos , Tórax , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus functional diagnostic testing strategies did not improve clinical outcomes in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring noninvasive testing. OBJECTIVE: To conduct an economic analysis for PROMISE (a major secondary aim of the study). DESIGN: Prospective economic study from the U.S. perspective. Comparisons were made according to the intention-to-treat principle, and CIs were calculated using bootstrap methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01174550). SETTING: 190 U.S. centers. PATIENTS: 9649 U.S. patients enrolled in PROMISE between July 2010 and September 2013. Median follow-up was 25 months. MEASUREMENTS: Technical costs of the initial (outpatient) testing strategy were estimated from Premier Research Database data. Hospital-based costs were estimated using hospital bills and Medicare cost-charge ratios. Physician fees were taken from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars, discounted at 3% annually, and estimated out to 3 years using inverse probability weighting methods. RESULTS: The mean initial testing costs were $174 for exercise electrocardiography; $404 for CTA; $501 to $514 for pharmacologic and exercise stress echocardiography, respectively; and $946 to $1132 for exercise and pharmacologic stress nuclear testing, respectively. Mean costs at 90 days were $2494 for the CTA strategy versus $2240 for the functional strategy (mean difference, $254 [95% CI, -$634 to $906]). The difference was associated with more revascularizations and catheterizations (4.25 per 100 patients) with CTA use. After 90 days, the mean cost difference between the groups out to 3 years remained small. LIMITATION: Cost weights for test strategies were obtained from sources outside PROMISE. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography angiography and functional diagnostic testing strategies in patients with suspected CAD have similar costs through 3 years of follow-up. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/economia , Idoso , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse/economia , Eletrocardiografia/economia , Teste de Esforço/economia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Honorários Médicos , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Functional assessment of coronary lesions has become an integral part of routine practice in most cath labs. Such evaluation is performed using a pressure wire that allows measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR). The latter has received a class I indication with level of evidence A according to the most recent European guidelines on myocardial revascularization for the assessment of angiographically moderate coronary lesions. The present document has the following objectives: 1) to summarize the theoretical basis of FFR; 2) to provide a guideline for vasodilator therapy; 3) to summarize scientific evidence supporting FFR; 4) to provide a model of health economy evaluation focusing on resource sparing associated with the use of FFR.
Assuntos
Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Trifosfato de Adenosina , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Circulação Colateral , Circulação Coronária , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Diástole , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Itália , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Contração Miocárdica , Nitroprussiato , Papaverina , VasodilatadoresRESUMO
AIMS: The observational PICTURE (Place of Reveal In the Care pathway and Treatment of patients with Unexplained Recurrent Syncope) registry enrolled 570 patients with unexplained syncope, documented their care pathway and the various tests they underwent before the insertion of an implantable loop recorder (ILR). The aims were to describe the extent and cost of diagnostic tests performed before the implant. METHODS AND RESULTS: Actual costs of 17 predefined diagnostic tests were characterized based on a combination of data from PICTURE and a micro-costing study performed at a medium-sized UK university hospital in the UK. The median cost of diagnostic tests per patient was £1114 (95% CI £995-£1233). As many patients received more than the median number of tests, the mean expenditure per patient was higher with £1613 (95% CI £1494-£1732), and for 10% of the patients the cost exceeded £3539. Tests were frequently repeated, and early use of specific and expensive tests was common. In the 12% of patients with types of tests entirely within the recommendations for an initial evaluation before ILR implant, the mean cost was £710. CONCLUSION: Important opportunities to reduce test-related costs before an ILR implant were identified, e.g. by more appropriate use of tests recommended in the initial evaluation, by decreasing repetition of tests, and by avoiding early use of specialized and expensive tests. A structured multidisciplinary approach would be the best model to achieve an optimal outcome.
Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo/economia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/economia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/economia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Eletroencefalografia/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
This study examined the impact of an emergency department (ED) observation unit's accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) on hospital length of stay (LOS), cost of care, and clinical outcome of patients who had sustained a transient ischemic attack (TIA). All patients with TIA presenting to the ED over a 18-consecutive month period were eligible for the study. During the initial 11 months of the study (pre-ADP period), all patients were admitted to the neurology service. Over the subsequent 7 months (post-ADP period), patients were either managed using the ADP or were admitted based on ADP exclusion criteria or at a physician's discretion. All patients had orders for serial clinical examinations, neurologic evaluation, cardiac monitoring, vascular imaging of the brain and neck, and echocardiography. A total of 142 patients were included in the study (mean age, 67.9 ± 13.9 years; 61% female; mean ABCD(2) score, 4.3 ± 1.4). In the post-ADP period, 68% of the patients were managed using the ADP. Of these patients, 79% were discharged with a median LOS of 25.5 hours (ED + observation unit). Compared with the pre-ADP patients, the post-ADP patients (ADP and non-ADP) had a 20.8-hour shorter median LOS (95% confidence interval, 16.3-25.1 hours; P < .01) than pre-ADP patients and lower median associated costs (cost difference, $1643; 95% confidence interval, $1047-$2238). The stroke rate at 90 days was low in both groups (pre-ADP, 0%; post-ADP, 1.2%). Our findings indicate that introduction of an ED observation unit ADP for patients with TIA at a primary stroke center is associated with a significantly shorter LOS and lower costs compared with inpatient admission, with comparable clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Química do Sangue/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diagnóstico por Imagem/economia , Feminino , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico/economia , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Recidiva , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the acceptability and feasibility of functional tests as a gateway to angiography for management of coronary artery disease (CAD), the ability of diagnostic strategies to identify patients who should undergo revascularisation, patient outcomes in each diagnostic strategy, and the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected or known CAD. DESIGN: A rapid systematic review of economic evaluations of alternative diagnostic strategies for CAD was carried out. A pragmatic and generalisable randomised controlled trial was undertaken to assess the use of the functional cardiac tests: angiography (controls); single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); stress echocardiography. SETTING: The setting was Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, a tertiary cardiothoracic referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with suspected or known CAD and an exercise test result that required non-urgent angiography. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to one of the four initial diagnostic tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eighteen months post-randomisation: exercise time (modified Bruce protocol); cost-effectiveness compared with angiography (diagnosis, treatment and follow-up costs). The aim was to demonstrate equivalence in exercise time between those randomised to functional tests and those randomised to angiography [defined as the confidence interval (CI) for mean difference from angiography within 1 minute]. RESULTS: The 898 patients were randomised to angiography (n = 222), SPECT (n = 224), MRI (n = 226) or stress echo (n = 226). Initial diagnostic tests were completed successfully with unequivocal results for 98% of angiography, 94% of SPECT (p = 0.05), 78% of MRI (p < 0.001) and 90% of stress echocardiography patients (p < 0.001). Some 22% of SPECT patients, 20% of MRI patients and 25% of stress echo patients were not subsequently referred for an angiogram. Positive functional tests were confirmed by positive angiography in 83% of SPECT patients, 89% of MRI patients and 84% of stress echo patients. Negative functional tests were followed by positive angiograms in 31% of SPECT patients, 52% of MRI patients and 48% of stress echo patients tested. The proportions that had coronary artery bypass graft surgery were 10% (angiography), 11% (MRI) and 13% (SPECT and stress echo) and percutaneous coronary intervention 25% (angiography), 18% (SPECT) and 23% (MRI and stress echo). At 18 months, comparing SPECT and stress echo with angiography, a clinically significant difference in total exercise time can be ruled out. The MRI group had significantly shorter mean total exercise time of 35 seconds and the upper limit of the CI was 1.14 minutes less than in the angiography group, so a difference of at least 1 minute cannot be ruled out. At 6 months post-treatment, SPECT and angiography had equivalent mean exercise time. Compared with angiography, the MRI and stress echo groups had significantly shorter mean total exercise time of 37 and 38 seconds, respectively, and the upper limit of both CIs was 1.16 minutes, so a difference of at least 1 minute cannot be ruled out. The differences were mainly attributable to revascularised patients. There were significantly more non-fatal adverse events in the stress echo group, mostly admissions for chest pain, but no significant difference in the number of patients reporting events. Mean (95% CI) total additional costs over 18 months, compared with angiography, were 415 pounds (-310 pounds to 1084 pounds) for SPECT, 426 pounds (-247 pounds to 1088 pounds) for MRI and 821 pounds (10 pounds to 1715 pounds) for stress echocardiography, with very little difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) amongst the groups (less than 0.04 QALYs over 18 months). Cost-effectiveness was mainly influenced by test costs, clinicians' willingness to trust negative functional tests and by a small number of patients who had a particularly difficult clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: Between 20 and 25% of patients can avoid invasive testing using functional testing as a gateway to angiography, without substantial effects on outcomes. The SPECT strategy was as useful as angiography in identifying patients who should undergo revascularisation and the additional cost was not significant, in fact it would be reduced further by restricting the rest test to patients who have a positive stress test. MRI had the largest number of test failures and, in this study, had the least practical use in screening patients with suspected CAD, although it had similar outcomes to stress echo and is still an evolving technology. Stress echo patients had a 10% test failure rate, significantly shorter total exercise time and time to angina at 6 months post-treatment, and a greater number of adverse events, leading to significantly higher costs. Given the level of skill required for stress echo, it may be best to reserve this test for those who have a contraindication to SPECT and are unable or unwilling to have MRI. Further research, using blinded reassessment of functional test results and angiograms, is required to formally assess diagnostic accuracy. Longer-term cost-effectiveness analysis, and further studies of MRI and new generation computed tomography are also required.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Revascularização Miocárdica/economia , Idoso , Intervalos de Confiança , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ecocardiografia/economia , Inglaterra , Teste de Esforço/economia , Feminino , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Revascularização Miocárdica/efeitos adversos , Revascularização Miocárdica/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton ÚnicoRESUMO
AIMS: Despite the large number of hospital admissions due to syncope, information on the in-hospital cost of management of these patients remains incomplete. METHODS AND RESULTS: In order to assess such cost, we analysed the clinical histories of the patients suffering from syncope who were admitted to our Unit of Cardiology in 2003. We determined the length of stay (in days) for each inpatient, the number of diagnostic tests performed, and the various therapeutic procedures undertaken. Two hundred and three patients (mean age 68 +/- 14, 49% female) were admitted because of syncope. Final diagnoses on discharge were drug-induced syncope in 10 patients, vasovagal syncope in 11, syncope secondary to cardiac ischaemia in 18, valvular disease in 4, rapid supraventricular arrhythmia in 20, ventricular arrhythmia in 19, atrioventricular block in 90, and unexplained syncope in 31 patients. Of these 203 patients, 70 (34.5%) had a previous history of cardiac disease. The global cost for all 203 patients was 2,264,979 Euros. The overall cost per patient was 11,158 Euros (range: 1651-31,762) including stay, diagnosis, and treatment. The overall cost of hospital stay per patient was 3718 Euros (range: 1436-5679). The overall cost per diagnosis of the 203 patients was 1141 Euros (range: 155-3577), and the cost of the therapeutic procedures required was 6299 Euros (range: 0-23 115). The most expensive were those cases of syncope secondary to ventricular arrhythmia, the cost of which is 20 times that of drug-induced syncope. CONCLUSION: The cost per diagnosis and treatment of a patient admitted because of syncope varies widely with important differences depending on the specific cause.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/economia , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Síncope/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the use, yield, and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests used in the evaluation of syncope in children. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 169 pediatric patients presenting to a tertiary care center with new onset syncope was undertaken. Test results were considered diagnostic when an abnormal result correlated with the clinical diagnosis or a normal result was obtained during a syncopal episode. Costs were based on the hospital cost of testing for fiscal year 1999, using a relative value unit-based costing methodology and did not include professional fees or costs of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 663 tests were performed at a cost of 180,128 dollars. Only 26 tests (3.9%) were diagnostic in 24 patients (14.2%). The average cost per patient was 1055 dollars, and the cost per diagnostic result was 6928 dollars. Echocardiograms, chest radiographs, cardiac catheterizations, electrophysiology studies, and serum evaluations were not diagnostic. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of pediatric syncope remains expensive, and testing has a low diagnostic yield. An approach that focuses on the use of testing to verify findings from the history and physical examination or exclude life-threatening causes is justified.
Assuntos
Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ecocardiografia/economia , Eletrocardiografia/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síncope/etiologia , Teste da Mesa Inclinada/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the prognostic and cost implications of stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), or MPS, in patients with a high pretest likelihood (>0.85) of coronary artery disease (CAD) with no previous CAD. BACKGROUND: Sparse data are available regarding the prognostic performance characteristics of MPS in this patient group. METHOD: We followed up 1,270 consecutive patients with no previous revascularization or myocardial infarction (MI), with a pre-exercise tolerance test (ETT) likelihood of CAD > or =0.85, who underwent exercise or adenosine stress MPS (follow-up 94.4% complete; 2.2 +/- 1.2 years; 60 hard events [5.9%, 2.6%/year]). Risk adjustment of survival data was done using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Costs per reclassification of risk were calculated using assumed costs and threshold analyses. RESULTS: In patients treated medically after MPS, normal MPS had a low risk of cardiac death and hard events (0.6% and 1.3% per year, respectively). With increasing extent and severity of MPS defects, the risk of both cardiac death and hard events increased significantly (p < 0.05). Cox models indicated that the addition of MPS data resulted in incremental prognostic value over pre-MPS data (chi-square increase 48 to 87, p < 0.0001). Compared with strategies of initial referral to ETT in patients able to exercise, initial referral to MPS appeared to be a more cost-effective strategy. Similarly, compared with a strategy of direct referral to catheterization in patients with a high likelihood of CAD, initial referral to MPS is a cost-saving approach. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a high likelihood of CAD but without known CAD, stress MPS yields incremental value and achieves risk stratification in a cost-effective manner. The current results support a strategy of initial stress imaging in this patient cohort, as a reasonable alternative to direct referral to catheterization or initial ETT.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/economia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Teste de Esforço/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most patients come to the catheterization laboratory without prior functional tests, which makes the cost-effective treatment of patients with intermediate coronary lesions a practical challenge. METHODS: We developed a decision model to compare the long-term costs and benefits of 3 strategies for treating patients with an intermediate coronary lesion and no prior functional study: 1) deferring the decision for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to obtain a nuclear stress imaging study (NUC strategy); 2) measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) at the time of angiography to help guide the decision for PCI (FFR strategy); and 3) stenting all intermediate lesions (STENT strategy). On the basis of the literature, we estimated that 40% of intermediate lesions would produce ischemia, 70% of patients treated with PCI and 30% of patients treated medically would be free of angina after 4 years, and the quality-of-life adjustment for living with angina was 0.9 (1.0 = perfect health). We estimated the cost of FFR to be 761 dollars, the cost of nuclear stress imaging to be 1093 dollars, and the cost of medical treatment for angina to be 1775 dollars per year. The extra cost of splitting the angiogram and PCI as dictated by the NUC strategy was 3886 dollars by use of hospital cost-accounting data. Sensitivity and threshold analyses were performed to determine which variables affected our results. RESULTS: The FFR strategy saved 1795 dollars per patient compared with the NUC strategy and 3830 dollars compared with the STENT strategy. Quality-adjusted life expectancy was similar among the 3 strategies (NUC-FFR = 0.8 quality-adjusted days, FFR-STENT = 6 quality-adjusted life days). Compared with the FFR strategy, the NUC strategy was expensive (>800,000 dollars per quality-adjusted life year gained). Both screening strategies were superior to (less cost, better outcomes) the STENT strategy. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the NUC strategy would only become attractive (<50,000 dollars/quality-adjusted life years compared with FFR) if the specificity of nuclear stress imaging was >25% better than FFR. Our results were not altered significantly by changing the other assumptions. CONCLUSION: In patients with an intermediate coronary lesion and no prior functional study, measuring FFR to guide the decision to perform PCI may lead to significant cost savings compared with performing nuclear stress imaging or with simply stenting lesions in all patients.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/economia , Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Doença das Coronárias/economia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Angina Pectoris/economia , Angina Pectoris/terapia , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Cintilografia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Stents/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of using plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a pre-echocardiographic screening test for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in the general population. BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that plasma BNP and simple clinical parameters would reduce the number of echocardiograms needed and cost when screening for LVSD in the general population. METHODS: A random sample of 1,257 community subjects (age 25 to 74 years) was examined. Three risk groups were formed: one group with symptomatic ischemic heart disease (IHD); a second group with blood pressure >160/95 mm Hg and/or an abnormal electrocardiogram (high risk); and a group with none of these risk factors (low risk). The BNP assay was adjusted to give a high sensitivity. RESULTS: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was prevalent in 0.7% (6/823), 6% (16/269), and 19% (26/140) of low-risk and high-risk subjects and IHD subjects, respectively. Raised BNP concentrations (>8 pg/ml) occurred in 41%, 64%, and 71%. Sensitivities of BNP for detecting LVSD were 83% (5/6), 94% (15/16), and 92% (24/26); and the negative predictive values were 99.8%, 99.0%, and 95.1%. Brain natriuretic peptide was not associated with LVSD in low-risk subjects (p = 0.087), but in IHD subjects (p = 0.015) and high-risk subjects (p = 0.023). Screening high-risk subjects by BNP before echocardiography could have reduced the cost per detected case of LVSD by 26% for the cost ratio of 1/20 (BNP/echocardiogram). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects at low and high risk of LVSD can be identified by simple clinical parameters, and BNP testing further reduces the number of echocardiograms needed and the costs of screening in subjects at risk <75 years of age in the general population.
Assuntos
Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/sangue , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , SístoleAssuntos
Eletrocardiografia , Epinefrina , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Síndrome do QT Longo/diagnóstico , Síndrome do QT Longo/genética , Eletrocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/economia , Genótipo , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Síndrome do QT Longo/classificação , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of coronary angiography performed in a low volume Center, we examined our 1-year activity. METHODS: The organizational model of the multipurpose cardiac catheterization laboratory is described. In this type of facility both coronary angiographic and electrophysiological studies are performed. To evaluate the laboratory performance we examined the utilization level, the appropriateness of the studies, the complication rates and the number of studies that had to be repeated because of inadequate data or image quality. The costs were calculated for the in-house laboratory setting (the actual scenario) and for the 25 km distant laboratory setting (the historical scenario). RESULTS: The laboratory caseload of coronary angiography was 342 studies, 46% of the overall laboratory activity; 175 patients (51%) underwent non-pharmacological therapy, 129 patients (38%) were treated with medical therapy; the percentage of patients with normal coronary arteries was 11%. Two patients (0.58%) had vascular complications, 1 patient (0.29%) developed an acute myocardial infarction 2 hours after coronary angiography without any evidence of angiographic modifications at the repeated study. In no patient the study had to be repeated because of inadequate data or image quality. The mean cost of a coronary angiography was Lit. 512,000 (265 Euro) for the actual scenario; it would have been Lit. 694,000 (359 Euro) for the historical scenario, with Lit. 182,000 (94 Euro) saved. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the accepted criteria of good laboratory performance and cost-effectiveness. Thus coronary angiography can be performed effectively and efficiently in a low volume Center.
Assuntos
Institutos de Cardiologia/economia , Institutos de Cardiologia/organização & administração , Angiografia Coronária , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , ItáliaAssuntos
Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Sopros Cardíacos , Criança , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Tomada de Decisões , Ecocardiografia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Sopros Cardíacos/classificação , Sopros Cardíacos/diagnóstico , Sopros Cardíacos/etiologia , Humanos , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) has potential as a cost-effective approach to diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease. BACKGROUND: Coronary calcification quantified by EBCT is closely related to the extent of atherosclerosis. METHODS: A model based upon published sensitivities (Se)/specificities (Sp) for diagnosis in an ambulatory patient of obstructive coronary disease (> or =50% stenosis) and population prevalence was tested for angiography alone, or treadmill exercise, stress echocardiography, stress thallium or predetermined EBCT calcium score outpoints, followed by angiography if indicated. RESULTS: Total direct testing costs increased in proportion to disease prevalence whereas cost-effectiveness, direct costs/patient diagnosed correctly with disease, decreased as a function of prevalence. Using an EBCT calcium score of 168 (Se/Sp = 71%/90%) provided for the least costly and most cost-effective noninvasive pathway. Calcium scores of 80 (Se/Sp = 84%/84%) and 37 (Se/Sp = 90%/77%) were also cost-effective when prevalence of disease was < or =70%; but results for a >0 calcium score (Se/Sp = 95%/46%) cutpoint were not superior to conventional methods. Calcium score cutpoints of 37, 80 or 168 provided similar or superior overall negative and positive predictive values to conventional noninvasive testing pathways across all prevalence subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In ambulatory patients evaluated for obstructive coronary disease, a testing pathway utilizing quantification of coronary calcium by EBCT as an initial noninvasive testing approach minimized direct costs, and maximized cost-effectiveness in population groups with low/ moderate disease prevalence (< or =70%); as expected, direct angiography as the first and only test proved most cost-effective in patients with a high prevalence (>70%) of disease.
Assuntos
Calcinose/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Calcinose/complicações , Calcinose/metabolismo , Cálcio/metabolismo , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/metabolismo , Doença das Coronárias/etiologia , Doença das Coronárias/metabolismo , Vasos Coronários/metabolismo , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ecocardiografia/economia , Teste de Esforço/economia , Humanos , Prevalência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the influence of payor status on the use and appropriateness of cardiac procedures. BACKGROUND: The use of invasive procedures affects the cost of cardiovascular care and may be influenced by payor status. METHODS: We compared treatment and outcomes of myocardial infarction among four payor groups: fee for service (FFS), health maintenance organization (HMO), Medicaid and uninsured. Multivariate comparison was performed on the use of invasive cardiac procedures, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality in 17,600 patients <65 years old enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from June 1994 to October 1995. To determine the appropriateness of coronary angiography, we compared its use in patients at low and high risk for cardiac events. RESULTS: Angiography was performed in 86% of FFS, 80% of HMO, 61% of Medicaid and 75% of uninsured patients. FFS patients were more likely to undergo angiography than HMO (odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 to 1.42), Medicaid (OR 2.43, 95% CI 2.11 to 2.81) and uninsured patients (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.25). Similar patterns for the use of coronary revascularization were found. Among those at low risk, FFS patients were as likely to undergo angiography as HMO patients but more likely than Medicaid and uninsured patients. For those at high risk, FFS patients were more likely to undergo angiography than patients in other payor groups. Adjusted mean length of stay (7.3 days) was similar among all payor groups, but adjusted mortality was higher in the Medicaid group (Medicaid vs. FFS: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Payor status is associated with the use and appropriateness of invasive cardiac procedures but not length of hospital stay after myocardial infarction. The higher in-hospital mortality in the Medicaid cohort merits further study.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados , Adulto , Angioplastia/economia , Angioplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate 1) the cost-effectiveness of amiodarone therapy in postinfarction patients; and 2) the influence of alternative diagnostic strategies (noninvasive only vs. noninvasive and electrophysiologic testing) on survival benefit and cost-effectiveness ratio of amiodarone therapy. BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of amiodarone therapy in postinfarction patients is still unknown, and no study has determined which diagnostic strategy should be used to maximize amiodarone survival benefit while improving its cost-effectiveness ratio. METHODS: We designed a postinfarction scenario wherein heart rate variability analysis on 24-h Holter monitoring was used as a screening test for 2-year amiodarone therapy in a cohort of survivors (mean age 57 years) of a recent myocardial infarction. Three different therapeutic strategies were compared: 1) no amiodarone; 2) amiodarone in patients with depressed heart rate variability; 3) amiodarone in patients with depressed heart rate variability and a positive programmed ventricular stimulation. Total variable costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy during a 20-year period were predicted with use of a Markov simulation model. Costs and charges were calculated with reference to an Italian and American hospital. RESULTS: Amiodarone therapy in patients with depressed heart rate variability and a positive programmed ventricular stimulation was dominated by a blend of the two alternatives. Compared with the no-treatment strategy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of amiodarone therapy in patients with depressed heart rate variability was $10,633 and $39,422 per gained quality-adjusted life-year using Italian costs and American charges, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a noninterventional option, amiodarone prescription in all patients with depressed heart rate variability seems to be a more appropriate approach than the alternative based on the combined use of heart rate variability and electrophysiologic study.