RESUMO
Importance: The influence of race and ethnicity on initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is relatively understudied in Medicare data. Objective: To investigate disparities in the initiation of DOACs compared with warfarin by race, ethnicity, and social vulnerability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a 50% sample of Medicare fee-for-service data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019 (mean patient enrollment duration, 7.7 years). Analysis took place between January 2023 and February 2024. A cohort of older adults (aged ≥65 years) with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated warfarin or DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) was identified. Exposure: Patients were classified as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The likelihood of starting use of DOACs compared with warfarin was modeled, adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, sex, county-level social vulnerability, and other clinical factors. Results: Among 950â¯698 anticoagulation initiations, consisting of 680â¯974 DOAC users and 269â¯724 warfarin users (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [7.6] years; 52.6% female), 5.2% were Black, 4.3% were Hispanic, and 86.7% were White. During the 10-year study period, DOAC use increased for all demographic groups. After adjustment, compared with White patients, Black patients were 23% less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and Hispanic patients were 13% less likely (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89) to initiate DOAC use. Disparities in DOAC initiation were greatest among Black patients in the earlier years but attenuated during the study period. For instance, in 2010, the OR of Black patients initiating DOACs was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.57), attenuating linearly over time to 0.69 by 2013 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89) by 2017. By 2019, these differences became nonsignificant (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.18). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to initiate DOACs for atrial fibrillation, although these differences diminished over time. Identifying the factors behind these early disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable access to novel therapies as they emerge for Black and Hispanic populations.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilação Atrial , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Medicare , Varfarina , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/etnologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-AmericanoAssuntos
Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Demência/induzido quimicamente , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Acetanilidas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation, incomplete adherence to anticoagulants increases risk of stroke. Non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are expensive; we evaluated whether higher copayments are associated with lower NOAC adherence. METHODS: Using a national claims database of commercially-insured patients, we performed a cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated a NOAC from 2012 to 2018. Patients were stratified into low (<$35), medium ($35-$59), or high (≥$60) copayments and propensity-score weighted based on demographics, insurance characteristics, comorbidities, prior health care utilization, calendar year, and the NOAC received. Follow-up was 1 year, with censoring for switching to a different anticoagulant, undergoing an ablation procedure, disenrolling from the insurance plan, or death. The primary outcome was adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary outcomes included NOAC discontinuation (no refill for 30 days after the end of NOAC supply) and switching anticoagulants. We compared PDC using a Kruskal-Wallis test and rates of discontinuation and switching using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: After weighting patients across the 3 copayment groups, the effective sample size was 17,558 patients, with balance across 50 clinical and demographic covariates (standardized differences <0.1). Mean age was 62 years, 29% of patients were female, and apixaban (43%), and rivaroxaban (38%) were the most common NOACs. Higher copayments were associated with lower adherence (P < .001), with a PDC of 0.82 (Interquartile range [IQR] 0.36-0.98) among those with high copayments, 0.85 (IQR 0.41-0.98) among those with medium copayments, and 0.88 (IQR 0.41-0.99) among those with low copayments. Compared to patients with low copayments, patients with high copayments had higher rates of discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.19; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among atrial fibrillation patients newly initiating NOACs, higher copayments in commercial insurance were associated with lower adherence and higher rates of discontinuation in the first year. Policies to lower or limit cost-sharing of important medications may lead to improved adherence and better outcomes among patients receiving NOACs.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/economia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Anticoagulantes/economia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Antitrombinas/economia , Antitrombinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Dabigatrana/economia , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Medicamentos , Inibidores do Fator Xa/economia , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part C/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pirazóis/economia , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/economia , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/economia , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/economia , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Tamanho da Amostra , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Tiazóis/economia , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Varfarina/economia , Varfarina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is declared as an international emergency in 2020. Its prevalence and fatality rate are rapidly increasing but the medication options are still limited for this perilous disease. The emergent outbreak of COVID-19 triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) keeps propagating globally. The present scenario has emphasized the requirement for therapeutic opportunities to relive and overcome this latest pandemic. Despite the fact, the deteriorating developments of COVID-19, there is no drug certified to have considerable effects in the medical treatment for COVID-19 patients. The COVID-19 pandemic requests for the rapid testing of new treatment approaches. Based on the evidence, hydroxychloroquine is the first medicine opted for the treatment of disease. Umifenovir, remdesivir, and fevipiravir are deemed the most hopeful antiviral agent by improving the health of infected patients. The dexamethasone is a first known steroid medicine that can save the lives of seriously ill patients, and it is shown in a randomized clinical trial by the United Kingdom that it reduced the death rate in COVID-19 patients. The current review recapitulates the existing evidence of possible therapeutic drugs, peptides, humanized antibodies, convulsant plasma, and vaccination that has revealed potential in fighting COVID-19 infections. Many randomized and controlled clinical trials are taking place to further validate these agent's safety and effectiveness in curing COVID-19.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/terapia , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Amidas/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , Antiparasitários/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Canabinoides/uso terapêutico , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Inativadores do Complemento/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Imunização Passiva , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Lopinavir/uso terapêutico , Nitrocompostos , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Soroterapia para COVID-19RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The Brazilian public health system does not cover pharmacotherapy for urge urinary incontinence (UUI). The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of providing tolterodine, solifenacin, oxybutynin (OXY), darifenacin, and mirabegron for the treatment of UUI in Brazilian public health system. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis with budget impact was performed. Six scenarios were assessed: in one scenario, all 5 therapeutic alternatives approved for coverage, and in the remaining 5 scenarios, only 1 alternative is approved for adoption for all patients. Clinical data were derived from a rapid systematic review conducted in several databases. One-way sensitivity analysis was also performed. The time horizon was 12 months. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that patients treated with OXY had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per outcomes assessed (change in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE): R$1180.08; change in urge incontinence episodes: R$757.85 and change in micturition frequency: R$907.75), corresponding to a budget impact of R$17.9 billion over 5 years. The change in effectiveness measures was the parameter that most influenced the results of the ICER per patient-year. CONCLUSION: The results of the study have shown that OXY and solifenacin had the lowest ICER per patient-year and the lowest budget impact when compared with other drugs.
Assuntos
Acetanilidas/economia , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/economia , Saúde Pública/tendências , Tiazóis/economia , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/tratamento farmacológico , Acetanilidas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/economia , Agentes Urológicos/economia , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: This paper discusses the recent evidence supporting beta 3 adrenergic agonists as the preferred pharmacological management of overactive bladder syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Mirabegron has a similar efficacy profile to first-line antimuscarinics with favorable adverse effects profile. Treatment of OAB with beta-3 adrenergic agonist should be favored in patients at higher risk of anticholinergic adverse events. The efficacy and tolerability of beta-3 adrenergic agonists are consistently reported in older OAB patients, whether used alone or with other antimuscarinics. Mirabegron is cost-effective in treating OAB unless the symptoms were severe or refractory. Combination therapy of mirabegron and other pharmacotherapy has proven to be efficient in controlling OAB symptoms without inducing serious add-on adverse effects. While beta-3 adrenergic agonists bear favorable advantages in OAB treatment, physicians should perform a thorough and careful pre-treatment planning to optimize treatment benefits and adherence.
Assuntos
Acetanilidas/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 3/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Acetanilidas/economia , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 3/economia , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinonas , Pirrolidinas , Tiazóis/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There have been no licensed treatment options in the UK for treating thrombocytopenia in people with chronic liver disease requiring surgery. Established management largely involves platelet transfusion prior to the procedure or as rescue therapy for bleeding due to the procedure. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two thrombopoietin receptor agonists, avatrombopag (Doptelet®; Dova Pharmaceuticals, Durham, NC, USA) and lusutrombopag (Mulpleta®; Shionogi Inc., London, UK), in addition to established clinical management compared with established clinical management (no thrombopoietin receptor agonist) in the licensed populations. DESIGN: Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count of < 50,000/µl) in people with chronic liver disease requiring surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Lusutrombopag 3 mg and avatrombopag (60 mg if the baseline platelet count is < 40,000/µl and 40 mg if it is 40,000-< 50,000/µl). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of platelet transfusion and rescue therapy or risk of rescue therapy only. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic review including meta-analysis. English-language and non-English-language articles were obtained from several databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, all searched from inception to 29 May 2019. ECONOMIC EVALUATION: Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: From a comprehensive search retrieving 11,305 records, six studies were included. Analysis showed that avatrombopag and lusutrombopag were superior to no thrombopoietin receptor agonist in avoiding both platelet transfusion and rescue therapy or rescue therapy only, and mostly with a statistically significant difference (i.e. 95% confidence intervals not overlapping the point of no difference). However, only avatrombopag seemed to be superior to no thrombopoietin receptor agonist in reducing the risk of rescue therapy, although far fewer patients in the lusutrombopag trials than in the avatrombopag trials received rescue therapy. When assessing the cost-effectiveness of lusutrombopag and avatrombopag, it was found that, despite the success of these in avoiding platelet transfusions prior to surgery, the additional long-term gain in quality-adjusted life-years was very small. No thrombopoietin receptor agonist was clearly cheaper than both lusutrombopag and avatrombopag, as the cost savings from avoiding platelet transfusions were more than offset by the drug cost. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that, for all thresholds below £100,000, no thrombopoietin receptor agonist had 100% probability of being cost-effective. LIMITATIONS: Some of the rescue therapy data for lusutrombopag were not available. There were inconsistencies in the avatrombopag data. From the cost-effectiveness point of view, there were several additional important gaps in the evidence required, including the lack of a price for avatrombopag. CONCLUSIONS: Avatrombopag and lusutrombopag were superior to no thrombopoietin receptor agonist in avoiding both platelet transfusion and rescue therapy, but they were not cost-effective given the lack of benefit and increase in cost. FUTURE WORK: A head-to-head trial is warranted. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019125311. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 51. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Thrombocytopenia, which is a reduction in platelet numbers in the blood, is a common complication of chronic liver disease. It increases the risk of bleeding during procedures including liver biopsy and transplantation. It can delay or prevent procedures, leading to illness and death. Established treatment largely involves platelet transfusion before the procedure or as rescue therapy for bleeding. This report aims to systematically review the clinical effectiveness and estimate the cost-effectiveness of the first two recently licensed treatments, thrombopoietin receptor agonists avatrombopag (Doptelet®; Dova Pharmaceuticals, Durham, NC, USA) (60 mg if platelet count is < 40,000/µl and 40 mg if platelet count is 40,000< 50,000/µl) and lusutrombopag (Mulpleta®; Shionogi Inc., London, UK) (3 mg if platelet count is < 50,000/µl), compared with established treatment. From a comprehensive search, six studies were included. Clinical effectiveness analysis showed that avatrombopag and lusutrombopag were superior to no thrombopoietin receptor agonist in avoiding both platelet transfusion and rescue therapy. Only avatrombopag seemed superior to no thrombopoietin receptor agonist in reducing rescue therapy alone. Cost-effectiveness analysis found that lusutrombopag and avatrombopag were more expensive than no thrombopoietin receptor agonist over a lifetime, as the savings from avoiding platelet transfusions were exceeded by the drug cost, and without long-term health benefits. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis, which examined the effect of uncertainty, showed that no thrombopoietin receptor agonist had 100% probability of being cost-effective. Uncertainty about the price of avatrombopag and the content and costs of platelet transfusions and the potential under-reporting of use to estimate platelet transfusion-specific mortality had the greatest impact on results. If the price of avatrombopag was (confidential information has been removed) below the price of lusutrombopag, avatrombopag would become cost saving in the 40,000< 50,000/µl subgroup. However, although in some scenarios avatrombopag costs could decrease in the 40,000< 50,000/µl subgroup to around 10% more than the cost of no thrombopoietin receptor agonist, there would be negligible health benefits and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios would remain very high, meaning that lusutrombopag and avatrombopag would still not be considered cost-effective.
Assuntos
Cinamatos/uso terapêutico , Doença Hepática Terminal/complicações , Receptores de Trombopoetina/agonistas , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Trombocitopenia/tratamento farmacológico , Trombocitopenia/etiologia , Teorema de Bayes , Cinamatos/efeitos adversos , Cinamatos/economia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Transfusão de Plaquetas/economia , Transfusão de Plaquetas/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Atenção Secundária à Saúde , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/economia , Tiofenos/efeitos adversos , Tiofenos/economiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Treatment patterns and costs were characterized among patients with overactive bladder (OAB) receiving later-line target therapies (combination mirabegron/antimuscarinic, sacral nerve stimulation [SNS], percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation [PTNS], or onabotulinumtoxinA). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study using 2013 to 2017 MarketScan databases, two partially overlapping cohorts of adults with OAB ("IPT cohort": patients with incident OAB pharmacotherapy use; "ITT cohort," incident target therapy) with continuous enrollment were identified; first use was index. Demographic characteristics, treatment patterns and costs over the 24-month follow-up period were summarized. Crude mean (standard deviation [SD]) OAB-specific (assessed by OAB diagnostic code or pharmaceutical dispensation record) costs were estimated according to target therapy. RESULTS: The IPT cohort comprised 54 066 individuals (mean [SD] age 58.5 [15.0] years; 76% female), the ITT cohort, 1662 individuals (mean [SD] age 62.8 [14.9] years; 83% female). Seventeen percent of the IPT cohort were treated with subsequent line(s) of therapy after index therapy; among those, 73% received antimuscarinics, 23% mirabegron, and 1.4% a target therapy. For the ITT cohort, 32% were initially treated with SNS, 27% with onabotulinumtoxinA, 26% with combination mirabegron/antimuscarinic, and 15% with PTNS. Subsequently, one-third of this cohort received additional therapies. Mean (SD) costs were lowest among patients receiving index therapy PTNS ($6959 [$7533]) and highest for SNS ($29 702 [$26 802]). CONCLUSIONS: Costs for SNS over 24 months are substantially higher than other treatments. A treatment patterns analysis indicates that oral therapies predominate; first-line combination therapy is common in the ITT cohort and uptake of oral therapy after procedural options is substantial.
Assuntos
Acetanilidas/uso terapêutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/terapia , Acetanilidas/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/economia , Terapia Combinada , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tiazóis/economia , Nervo Tibial/fisiopatologia , Estados Unidos , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Given the huge burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related stroke in Asia, stroke prevention represents an urgent issue in this region. We herein performed a network meta-analysis to examine the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with AF. METHODS: A systematic search of the publications was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies until July 2019. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were regarded as the effect estimates. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for the ranking probabilities was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included. For comparisons of NOACs vs warfarin, dabigatran (ORâ=â0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.86), rivaroxaban (ORâ=â0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81), apixaban (ORâ=â0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.65), but not edoxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, wheres dabigatran (ORâ=â0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76), rivaroxaban (ORâ=â0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86), apixaban (ORâ=â0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), and edoxaban (ORâ=â0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49) decreased the risk of major bleeding. In reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, apixaban and rivaroxaban ranked the best and second best (SUCRA 0.2% and 31.4%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (50.2%), edoxaban (75.2%), and warfarin (93.0%). In reducing the risk of major bleeding, edoxaban, and apixaban ranked the best and second best (1.5% and 30.8%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (48.4%), rivaroxaban (69.2%), and warfarin (100%). CONCLUSION: NOACs were at least as effective as warfarin, but more safer in Asians with AF. Apixaban was superior to other NOACs for reducing stroke or systemic embolism, while edoxaban showed a better safety profile than other NOACs.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Idoso , Antitrombinas/uso terapêutico , Ásia/epidemiologia , Povo Asiático/etnologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Metanálise em Rede , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Segurança , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Tiazóis/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Aim: Dried blood spot (DBS) is a sampling approach that offers several advantages over plasma and whole blood (WB) sampling, but several factors, such as hematocrit and temperature, can adversely affect quantitation. Methodology & results: In an open-label, three-way crossover study in healthy subjects, we explored the correlation between DBS, WB and plasma samples, and between DBS samples from finger-prick and venipuncture blood for measuring edoxaban and its metabolite M-4 using LC-MS/MS. The methods were validated comprehensively. The incurred sample reanalysis experiments demonstrated quantitation reproducibility in all three matrices. Overall, there was a good correlation (near perfect concordance for edoxaban) among plasma, WB and DBS measurements. M-4 concentrations in DBS and WB were lower than in plasma. Conclusion: These results indicate using DBS may be used as an alternative methodology to measure edoxaban pharmacokinetics.
Assuntos
Teste em Amostras de Sangue Seco/métodos , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos Cross-Over , Inibidores do Fator Xa/farmacologia , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Piridinas/farmacologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tiazóis/farmacologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Brexpiprazole is an oral atypical antipsychotic (OAA) for the treatment of schizophrenia (SCZ). This study compared all-cause and psychiatric inpatient hospitalization and medical costs in adult patients with SCZ newly treated with brexpiprazole versus other US Food and Drug Administration-approved OAAs in a real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from: (1) the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases, and the MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid database; and (2) the de-identified Optum Clinformatics Datamart. Adult patients were identified if they had SCZ and initiated either brexpiprazole or another OAA during the study identification period (July 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, for MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental and for Optum; July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2016, for MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid) and had ≥12 months of continuous enrollment before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the first treatment date. Linear regression analyses were performed to test associations between treatment groups (brexpiprazole vs another OAA) and costs (total and medical); negative binomial regression models were used to estimate number of hospitalizations per year, adjusting for baseline characteristics and medication adherence to index treatment during the 12-month follow-up. FINDINGS: The final study sample consisted of 6254 patients with SCZ: 176 initiated brexpiprazole; 391, ziprasidone; 453, paliperidone; 523, lurasidone; 786, aripiprazole; 1234, quetiapine; 1264, olanzapine; and 1427, risperidone. Controlling for baseline characteristics and medication adherence, the adjusted number of hospitalizations (both all-cause and psychiatric), all-cause total costs, and all-cause medical costs did not differ across groups. Brexpiprazole users had the lowest mean psychiatric costs among all OAA users ($12,013; 95% bootstrap CI, 7488-16,538). Compared with brexpiprazole users, paliperidone (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], 1.52 [1.05-2.19]; P = 0.027) and quetiapine (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], 1.47 [1.04-2.07]; P = 0.029) users had more psychiatric hospitalizations per year. Paliperidone had higher psychiatric costs than brexpiprazole (total, $32,066 [95% bootstrap CI, 28,779-35,353] vs $23,851 [18,907-28,795]; medical, $19,343 [16,294-22,392] vs $12,013 [7488-16,538]). Psychiatric medical costs were also $6744 higher in olanzapine users (95% bootstrap CI, 1694-11,795; P = 0.009) than in brexpiprazole users. IMPLICATIONS: Patients with SCZ treated with brexpiprazole had fewer psychiatric hospitalizations and lower psychiatric costs than those treated with paliperidone. Differences in the number of all-cause hospitalizations and medical costs among treatments were not statistically significant. Although treatment decisions are driven by a number of factors (eg, clinical circumstances and drug costs), choice of OAA may affect health care costs.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Quinolonas/economia , Esquizofrenia/economia , Tiofenos/economia , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Aripiprazol/economia , Aripiprazol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Cloridrato de Lurasidona/economia , Cloridrato de Lurasidona/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Olanzapina/economia , Olanzapina/uso terapêutico , Palmitato de Paliperidona/economia , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/economia , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/economia , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapêutico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Risperidona/economia , Risperidona/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Tiazóis/economia , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Objective: To identify clinically relevant areas of concordance and discordance between product monographs for 4 direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) approved by regulatory authorities in Europe, the United States, and Canada. Data Sources: For each DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban), manufacturer product monographs were retrieved from the European Medicines Database, US Food and Drug Administration, and Health Canada Drug Product Database. Data Extraction: Monographs for each DOAC were independently reviewed by 2 investigators to identify areas of concordance and discordance. Discordance existed if it was deemed that a potentially clinically relevant difference existed. A heat map summarizing the data was created to identify areas of complete concordance, partial concordance (concordance between 2 of 3 monographs), and complete discordance. Data Synthesis: The areas of concordance were indications for use, use in extremes of weight, and switching to/from the DOAC. Areas of discordance included the following: differing recommendations for use/dosing with renal dysfunction; contraindication or use with caution with drug interactions, pregnancy, and hepatic/renal dysfunction; and timing of DOAC with spinal/epidural anesthesia after a procedure or traumatic puncture. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Concordance was most evident for uncomplicated patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, whereas discordance emerged for those having characteristics/factors wherein clinicians may seek clarification within product monographs (eg, impaired renal/hepatic function, drug interactions). As such, clinicians must be familiar with product information within their country of practice. Conclusion: Variability between jurisdictions was evident, and variability of DOAC use is likely to increase with expanding worldwide uptake.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Canadá , Dabigatrana/administração & dosagem , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Interações Medicamentosas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/administração & dosagem , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/administração & dosagem , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológicoAssuntos
Delusões/psicologia , Genealogia e Heráldica , Alucinações/psicologia , Fatores Etários , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Delusões/tratamento farmacológico , Progressão da Doença , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Alucinações/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Risperidona/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Aim: Optimal use of scarce resources is a focus in the healthcare sector, as resources devoted to health care are limited. Costs and health economic analyses can help guide decision-making concerning treatments. One important factor is the choice of cost perspective that can range from a focus on narrow drug budget costs to broader economic perspectives. In the case of treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, the aim of this cost analysis was to illustrate the differences in costs when applying different cost perspectives.Methods: In a cost analysis, pairwise comparisons of average costs of 6 months standard treatment with either a low molecular weight heparin parenteral anticoagulant (LMWH) and a Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) versus one of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants [NOACs; dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) used in daily clinical practice in Denmark for VTE patients were carried out. Each analysis included the results from five different cost analyses with increasingly broader cost perspectives going from the narrowest "drug cost only" perspective to the broadest "societal" perspective.Results: Focusing on "drug costs only", LMWH/VKA was associated with the lowest costs compared to all NOACs. However, including the economic impact of preventing recurrent VTE and limit bleedings, apixaban and rivaroxaban resulted in slightly lower health care costs than LMWH/VKA. When applying the "societal perspective", the total costs saved with apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to LMWH/VKA further increased, with apixaban having the lowest total costs.Conclusions: The present study's case of oral anticoagulants in VTE treatment illustrated the importance of the cost perspective in the choice of therapy. If decision-making were based on drug costs only, instead of applying a health care sector or societal cost perspective, suboptimal decisions may be likely.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/economia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Modelos Econométricos , Tromboembolia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dabigatrana/economia , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Dinamarca , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/economia , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/economia , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis , Piridinas/economia , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Rivaroxabana/economia , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/economia , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has biological and clinical differences from adult CML. Management of paediatric CML presents unique challenges in growing children, and there are no specific guidelines for paediatric CML. This review focusses on the clinical characteristics, diagnostic issues and management of paediatric CML. Major studies that provide the basis of managing paediatric CML are summerized here. Studies conducted on adult CML patients were used to guide the management of places where studies were lacking in paediatric CML. Recently, dasatinib and nilotinib have been approved for treatment of paediatric CML, and their role has been discussed in the current management perspective. Allogeneic transplant, fertility and vaccination in paediatric CML, have also been discussed.
Assuntos
Dasatinibe/uso terapêutico , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/patologia , Pediatria/tendências , Pirimidinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: While trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOAC) to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT), it is unclear if the newer intervention is cost-effective. METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis using a Markov state-transition model over a time horizon of 60â¯months in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old patients with active malignancy and first acute symptomatic CAT who were eligible to receive either rivaroxaban/edoxaban or dalteparin. We obtained transition probability, relative risk, cost, and utility inputs from the literature. We estimated the differential impact on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of results. RESULTS: Using the base-case analysis over 60â¯months, DOAC versus dalteparin was associated with an incremental cost reduction of $24,129 with an incremental QALY reduction of 0.04. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, the cost of dalteparin contributed the most to the incremental cost difference; relative risk of death related to underlying cancer contributed the most of the incremental QALY difference. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the base-case analysis, with a large reduction in cost but small reduction in QALYs. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban or edoxaban as compared to dalteparin is cost saving from a payer's perspective for the treatment of CAT. Professional organizations and healthcare systems may want to consider this analysis in future practice recommendations.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Dalteparina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dalteparina/economia , Inibidores do Fator Xa/economia , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Piridinas/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Rivaroxabana/economia , Tiazóis/economia , Trombose/complicações , Trombose/economiaRESUMO
Malignancy is a well-established risk factor for venous thromboembolism and while low-molecular-weight heparin therapy has been standard of care for cancer-associated thrombosis for many years, many patients find injection therapy burdensome. The direct oral anticoagulant edoxaban has been shown to be noninferior to dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. In a Markov simulation model, edoxaban with 6-month time horizon and a United States societal perspective with 2017 US dollars, edoxaban was the preferred strategy in the general cancer population (6-month cost $6061 with 0.34 quality adjusted life years) and in a subgroup of patients with gastrointestinal malignancy (6-month cost $7227 with 0.34 quality adjusted life years). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio of dalteparin compared to edoxaban was $1,873,535 in the general oncology population and $694,058 in the gastrointestinal malignancy population.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Dalteparina/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose/economia , Anticoagulantes/economia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Dalteparina/economia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/economia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Teóricos , Neoplasias/complicações , Piridinas/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Tiazóis/economia , Trombose/etiologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban vs acenocoumarol in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Spain. METHODS: Markov model, adapted to the Spanish setting from the perspective of the National Health System, stimulating the progression of a hypothetical cohort of patients with NVAF throughout their lifetime, with different health states: stroke, haemorrhage, and other cardiovascular complications. Efficacy and safety data were obtained from the available clinical evidence (mainly from the phase III ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study). The costs of managing NVAF and its complications were obtained from Spanish sources. RESULTS: Edoxaban use led to 0.34 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALY) compared with acenocoumarol. The incremental cost with edoxaban was 3916, mainly because of higher pharmacological costs, which were partially offset by lower costs of treatment monitoring and managing NVAF events and complications. The cost per QALY was 11 518, within the thresholds commonly considered cost-effective in Spain (25 000-30 000 /QALY). The robustness of the results was confirmed by various sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Edoxaban is a cost-effective alternative to acenocoumarol in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF in Spain.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Piridinas/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Tiazóis/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Inibidores do Fator Xa , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Espanha , Tiazóis/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulant therapy in pediatric patients remains an issue and safer therapies, such as direct oral anticoagulants could overcome the limitations of conventional anticoagulant treatments in this population. Edoxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, is used for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Due to its pharmacokinetic characteristics, edoxaban is a promising candidate molecule for children. This study compared edoxaban in vitro effect in children and adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples were prospectively collected from 87 adults and 97 children (nâ¯=â¯12: <2â¯year-old; nâ¯=â¯8: 2-4â¯year-old; nâ¯=â¯9: 5-7â¯year-old; nâ¯=â¯14: 8-9â¯year-old; nâ¯=â¯10: 10-13â¯year-old; nâ¯=â¯15: 14-15â¯year-old; and nâ¯=â¯29: 16-18â¯year-old). Plasma samples were supplemented in vitro with edoxaban to a final concentration of 50, 150 or 300â¯ng/mL, and then edoxaban effect on prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen (Clauss assay), specific anti-factor Xa activity and thrombin generation assay (TGA) (with 5pM tissue factor and 4â¯nM phospholipids) was evaluated. RESULTS: PT, aPTT, and specific anti-Xa activity exhibited similar dose-dependent responses to edoxaban in the different age groups. The reduction of thrombin peak, the most edoxaban-sensitive TGA parameter, was similar in adults and children, but for the youngest group (<2â¯year-old) where the peak value reduction (median [Q1-Q3]) was higher than in adults (51% [44-59] versus 40% [32-46], pâ¯<â¯0.01; 74% [63-80] versus 65% [58-70], pâ¯<â¯0.05; and 84% [73-88] versus 76% [70-80], pâ¯<â¯0.05 for 50, 150 and 300â¯ng/mL edoxaban, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Edoxaban in vitro effect are comparable in children and adults except in the <2-year-old group.