In vitro activity, pharmacodynamic profile and dose optimization of biapenem against NDM and OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: A multicentre study in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Biapenem (BIPM) exhibited a less efficient substrate for various metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL) than other carbapenems. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate in vitro susceptibility data of BIPM and optimal dose based on Monte Carlo simulation to extend treatment options. METHODS: We collected 192 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) clinical isolates from unique patients among multicentres in Thailand, from June 2019 to March 2023. BIPM disk diffusion and broth-microdilution testing were performed to obtain minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Each BIPM regimen was simulated using the Monte Carlo technique to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). RESULTS: The most common genotypes among 192 CRKP isolates were blaOXA-48 (62.3%), blaOXA-48+blaNDM (22.6%) and blaNDM (15.1%). BIPM showed 22.4 and 28.6% susceptible rate when interpreted at clinical breakpoints of 1 and 2 mg/L. The MIC50 and MIC90 of BIPM against CRKP were 8 and 32 mg/L. The BIPM dosing regimens of 300 mg q 6 h infused 6 h and 600 mg q 8 h infused 8 h met the PTA target of %fTime >MIC at 50%, 75% and 100% against isolates MICs of ≤2 mg/L. Based on CFR ≥90%, no BIPM regimens were effective against all the studied CRKP isolates. CONCLUSION: BIPM exhibited a partially susceptible rate among the CRKP isolates in Thailand. The current suggested dose of BIPM with prolonged infusion appears appropriate regimen against CRKP MICs of ≤2 mg/L. However, the empirical use of BIPM for severe CRE infection is not recommended unless the susceptibility has been confirmed.

Meropenem Population Pharmacokinetics and Simulations in Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Brain Tissue.

Meropenem is a broad spectrum carbapenem used for the treatment of cerebral infections. There is a need for data describing meropenem pharmacokinetics (PK) in the brain tissue to optimize therapy in these infections. Here, we present a meropenem PK model in the central nervous system and simulate dosing regimens. This was a population PK analysis of a previously published prospective study of patients admitted to the neurointesive care unit between 2016 and 2019 who received 2 g of meropenem intravenously every 8 h. Meropenem concentration was determined in blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain microdialysate. Meropenem was described by a six-compartment model: two compartments in the blood, two in the CSF, and two in the brain tissue. Creatinine clearance and brain glucose were included as covariates. The median elimination rate constant was 1.26 h-1, the central plasma volume was 5.38 L, and the transfer rate constants from the blood to the CSF and from the blood to the brain were 0.001 h-1 and 0.02 h-1, respectively. In the first 24 h, meropenem 2 g, administered every 8 h via intermittent and extended infusions achieved good target attainment in the CSF and brain, but continuous infusion (CI) was better at steady-state. Administering a 3 g loading dose (LD) followed by 8 g CI was beneficial for early target attainment. In conclusion, a meropenem PK model was developed using blood, CSF, and brain microdialysate samples. An 8 g CI may be needed for good target attainment in the CSF and brain. Giving a LD prior to the CI improved the probability of early target attainment.

A dosing nomograph for cerebrospinal fluid penetration of meropenem applied by continuous infusion in patients with nosocomial ventriculitis.

OBJECTIVES: In difficult-to-treat infections such as nosocomial ventriculitis, meropenem exposure in the infected compartment is often uncertain but crucial for antibacterial effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of meropenem in patients with nosocomial ventriculitis and to derive a nomograph to predict effective meropenem doses as a function of clinical parameters. METHODS: Retrospective patient data including meropenem serum and CSF levels as well as CSF inflammation markers were analyzed using NONMEM to assess the general pharmacokinetics and CSF penetration. Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate different meropenem dosing regimens. Probability of target attainment (PTA) in CSF was assessed, and a nomograph to achieve a target twice the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) during the dosing interval (100 %fT > 2x MIC) was developed. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with meropenem clearance dependent on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI eGFR, p < 0.001) best described meropenem serum pharmacokinetics of 51 critically ill patients. CSF penetration ratio was correlated with the amount of protein in CSF (p < 0.001), with higher CSF protein levels accounting for higher penetration ratios. Preserved renal function (CKD-EPI eGFR >50 mL/min/1.73 m2) and low CSF protein levels (<500 mg/L) resulted in 80% PTA 100 %fT >2xMIC) for a meropenem dose of 6 g/24 h. DISCUSSION: High interindividual variability in meropenem CSF concentration was observed in patients with nosocomial ventriculitis. A nomograph to predict the daily meropenem dose required for target attainment for a given eGFR and CSF protein count was developed.

A meropenem pharmacokinetics model in patients with haematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Optimal dosing of antibiotics is critical in immunocompromised patients suspected to have an infection. Data on pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem in patients with haematological malignancies are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To optimize dosing regimens, we aimed to develop a PK population model for meropenem in this population. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years, hospitalized in the haematology department of our 1500 bed university hospital for a malignant haematological disease and who had received at least one dose of meropenem were eligible. Meropenem was quantified by HPLC. PK were described using a non-linear mixed-effect model and external validation performed on a distinct database. Monte Carlo simulations estimated the PTA, depending on renal function, duration of infusion and MIC. Target for free trough concentration was set at >4× MIC. RESULTS: Overall, 88 patients (181 samples) were included, 66 patients (75%) were in aplasia and median Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) CLCR was 117 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range: 35-359). Initial meropenem dosing regimen ranged from 1 g q8h to 2 g q8h over 30 to 60 min. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination adequately described the data. Only MDRD CLCR was found to be significantly associated with CL. Only continuous infusion achieved a PTA of 100% whatever the MIC and MDRD CLCR. Short duration of infusion (<60 min) failed to reach an acceptable PTA, except for bacteria with MIC < 0.25 mg/L in patients with MDRD CLCR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with malignant haematological diseases, meropenem should be administered at high dose (6 g/day) and on continuous infusion to reach acceptable trough concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in septic patients on sustained low-efficiency dialysis: a population pharmacokinetic study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem in critically ill patients receiving sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). METHODS: Prospective population PK study on 19 septic patients treated with meropenem and receiving SLED for acute kidney injury. Serial blood samples for determination of meropenem concentrations were taken before, during and after SLED in up to three sessions per patient. Nonparametric population PK analysis with Monte Carlo simulations were used. Pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of 40% and 100% time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (f T > MIC) were used for probability of target attainment (PTA) and fractional target attainment (FTA) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RESULTS: A two-compartment linear population PK model was most appropriate with residual diuresis supported as significant covariate affecting meropenem clearance. In patients without residual diuresis the PTA for both targets (40% and 100% f T > MIC) and susceptible P. aeruginosa (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L) was > 95% for a dose of 0.5 g 8-hourly. In patients with a residual diuresis of 300 mL/d 1 g 12-hourly and 2 g 8-hourly would be required to achieve a PTA of > 95% and 93% for targets of 40% f T > MIC and 100% f T > MIC, respectively. A dose of 2 g 8-hourly would be able to achieve a FTA of 97% for 100% f T > MIC in patients with residual diuresis. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relevant PK variability for meropenem in patients on SLED, which was significantly influenced by the degree of residual diuresis. As a result dosing recommendations for meropenem in patients on SLED to achieve adequate PD targets greatly vary. Therapeutic drug monitoring may help to further optimise individual dosing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clincialtrials.gov, NCT02287493 .

Evaluating biapenem dosage regimens in intensive care unit patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.

This study was conducted to identify optimal dosage regimens and estimate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of short-infusion (SI) versus extended-infusion (EI) biapenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in Chinese intensive care unit (ICU) patients. A total of 85 strains of P. aeruginosa were collected, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of biapenem was measured by the serial two-fold agar dilution method. We designed four frequently used clinical regimens: biapenem 300 mg I.V. q12h, q8h, and q6h, and 600 mg q12h. The Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was performed using previously published pharmacokinetic data to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of these regimens as an SI (0.5 h) and an EI (1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 4 h). For a target of 40%fT>MIC (serum drug concentration remains above the MIC for a dosing period), none of the regimens achieved any CFRs>90% for P. aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR-PA) and even non-MDR-PA. The traditional biapenem SI regimens most commonly seen in clinical practice were insufficient in treating both MDR and non-MDR P. aeruginosa in ICU patients. However, biapenem 600 mg q12h over 2-4 h EI regimens could achieve CFR>90% with 20%fT>MIC. Clinical trials should aim to validate the potentially greater PK/PD index with higher, more frequent doses and longer extended infusions.

Role of renal function in risk assessment of target non-attainment after standard dosing of meropenem in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Severe bacterial infections remain a major challenge in intensive care units because of their high prevalence and mortality. Adequate antibiotic exposure has been associated with clinical success in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the target attainment of standard meropenem dosing in a heterogeneous critically ill population, to quantify the impact of the full renal function spectrum on meropenem exposure and target attainment, and ultimately to translate the findings into a tool for practical application. METHODS: A prospective observational single-centre study was performed with critically ill patients with severe infections receiving standard dosing of meropenem. Serial blood samples were drawn over 4 study days to determine meropenem serum concentrations. Renal function was assessed by creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft and Gault equation (CLCRCG). Variability in meropenem serum concentrations was quantified at the middle and end of each monitored dosing interval. The attainment of two pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets (100%T>MIC, 50%T>4×MIC) was evaluated for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 2 mg/L and 8 mg/L and standard meropenem dosing (1000 mg, 30-minute infusion, every 8 h). Furthermore, we assessed the impact of CLCRCG on meropenem concentrations and target attainment and developed a tool for risk assessment of target non-attainment. RESULTS: Large inter- and intra-patient variability in meropenem concentrations was observed in the critically ill population (n = 48). Attainment of the target 100%T>MIC was merely 48.4% and 20.6%, given MIC values of 2 mg/L and 8 mg/L, respectively, and similar for the target 50%T>4×MIC. A hyperbolic relationship between CLCRCG (25-255 ml/minute) and meropenem serum concentrations at the end of the dosing interval (C8h) was derived. For infections with pathogens of MIC 2 mg/L, mild renal impairment up to augmented renal function was identified as a risk factor for target non-attainment (for MIC 8 mg/L, additionally, moderate renal impairment). CONCLUSIONS: The investigated standard meropenem dosing regimen appeared to result in insufficient meropenem exposure in a considerable fraction of critically ill patients. An easy- and free-to-use tool (the MeroRisk Calculator) for assessing the risk of target non-attainment for a given renal function and MIC value was developed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01793012 . Registered on 24 January 2013.

[The reliability of using impenem, meropenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam to treat nosocomial Gram-negative bacterial infections with Monte Carlo simulation].

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of using imipenem, meropenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacterial infections with Monte Carlo simulation(MCS). Methods: The MIC of the four agents collected from hospital-acquired infections were detected in accordance with broth dilution method of Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). MCS were conducted with MICs and the pharmacokinetics parameters of the four agents based on conventional dose regimens.The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of time over MIC target attainment in different dosing regimen were generated. Results: A total of 2 541 strains, including 2 093 strains of Enterobacteriaceae and 448 strains of glucose non-fermentative bacilli were collected.The MIC(90) of imipenem and meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae were less than 1 mg/L in general, whereas MIC(90) of two agents with ß-lactamase inhibitors was around 64 mg/L.As to glucose non-fermenting bacteria, MICs of all the four agents were very high, especially to Acinetobacter baumannii, which indicated MIC(50) more than 32 mg/L.MCS revealed that carbapenems had significantly higher CFR than those with ß-lactamase inhibitors.Imipenem and meropenem (1 g, q8 h) obtained CFRs of 74.69% and 81.42%, respectively.The CFR of cefoperazone-sulbactam (2 g, q8 h) and piperacillin-tazobactam (4 g, q6 h) (both excluding ß-lactamase inhibitors) were just 49.59% and 27.66% respectively, which increased after excluding A. baumannii in piperacillin-tazobactam. Conclusions: The conventional dose regimens of imipenem and meropenem are reliable for the empiric therapy of Gram-negative hospital-acquired bacterial infections.Piperacillin-tazobactam is suggested to use with higher doses or prolonged infusion time to satisfy the time of drug concentration exceeded the MIC(T>MIC)requirement.More clinical studies of cefoperazone-sulbactam should be conducted to optimize its regimen and guarantee its efficacy.

Antibiotic Dosing in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Appropriate antibiotic dosing is critical to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis. The addition of continuous renal replacement therapy makes achieving appropriate antibiotic dosing more difficult. The lack of continuous renal replacement therapy standardization results in treatment variability between patients and may influence whether appropriate antibiotic exposure is achieved. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate impacts attaining appropriate antibiotic concentrations when conventional continuous renal replacement therapy antibiotic doses were used. This study used Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the effect of effluent flow rate variance on pharmacodynamic target attainment for cefepime, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin, and tazobactam. Published demographic and pharmacokinetic parameters for each antibiotic were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model. Monte Carlo simulations of 5000 patients were evaluated for each antibiotic dosing regimen at the extremes of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommended effluent flow rates (20 and 35 mL/kg/h). The probability of target attainment was calculated using antibiotic-specific pharmacodynamic targets assessed over the first 72 hours of therapy. Most conventional published antibiotic dosing recommendations, except for levofloxacin, reach acceptable probability of target attainment rates when effluent rates of 20 or 35 mL/kg/h are used.

Population Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Continuous-Infusion Meropenem and Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Infections Due to KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

We assessed the population pharmacokinetics of high-dose continuous-infusion (HDCI) meropenem in a cohort of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections. Monte Carlo simulations were used to define the permissible HDCI meropenem regimens that could be safely considered for the treatment of KPC-Kp infections due to meropenem-resistant strains. Permissible doses were arbitrarily defined as those associated with a ≤10% to 15% likelihood of meropenem steady-state concentrations (Css) of >100 mg/liter. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) of four incremental pharmacodynamic determinants for meropenem efficacy (100% T>1×MIC, 100% T>2×MIC, 100% T>3×MIC, and 100% T>4×MIC, where "T>MIC" represents the time during which the plasma concentration of this time-dependent antibacterial agent is maintained above the MIC for the pathogen) in relation to different classes of renal function were calculated. The cumulative fractions of response (CFR) for the permissible HDCI meropenem regimens were calculated against the MIC distribution of the KPC-Kp clinical isolates that were collected routinely at our University Hospital between 2013 and 2016 (n = 169). Ninety-seven meropenem Css were included in the analysis. The final model included creatinine clearance (CrCL) as a covariate and explained 94% of the population variability. Monte Carlo simulations based on licensed dosages of up to 6 g/day predicted an acceptable PTA (>80%) of 100% T>1×MIC against KPC-Kp with a meropenem MIC of ≤32 mg/liter in patients with a CrCL level of <130 ml/min. Dosages of 8 g/day were needed for achieving the same target in patients with CrCL at levels of 130 to 200 ml/min. In dealing with pathogens with a meropenem MIC of 64 mg/liter, HDCI regimens using meropenem at higher than licensed levels should be considered. In these cases, real-time therapeutic drug monitoring could be a useful adjunct for optimized care. The predicted CFR were >75% in all of the classes of renal function.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Meropenem for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients by Monte Carlo Simulation.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is a frequent complication among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, there are currently no pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data to guide meropenem dosing in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the PK/PD properties of meropenem in these patients and whether the usual dosing regimens of meropenem (2-hour infusion, 1 g, every 8 hours) was suitable. METHODS: A total of 11 patients with a diagnosis of ICH complicated with NP were selected in the emergency internal medicine and treated with a 1-g/2-hours extended infusion model. The plasma concentrations of meropenem were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. PK parameters were estimated by plasma concentration versus time profile using WinNonlin software. The probability of target attainments (PTAs) of meropenem at different minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) based on percentage time that concentrations were above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%T>MIC) value were performed by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The volume of distribution and total body clearance of meropenem were 55.55 L/kg and 22.89 L/h, respectively. Using 40%T>MIC, PTA was >90% at MICs ≤4 µg/mL. Using 80% or 100%T>MIC, PTA was >90% only at MICs ≤1 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The PK/PD profile of dosing regimens tested will assist in selecting the appropriate meropenem regimens for these patients. At a target of 40%T>MIC, the usual dosing regimens can provide good coverage for pathogens with MICs of ≤4 µg/mL. However, when a higher target (80% or 100%) is desired for difficult-to-treat infections, larger doses, prolonged infusions, shorter intervals, and/or combination therapy may be required.

Management of ventilator associated pneumonia with a new antibiotic adjuvant entity (ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodium edetate) - A novel approach to spare carbapenems.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most serious nosocomial infections in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to evaluate a new approach to spare the carbapenems for the management of patients diagnosed with VAP due to Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii). METHOD: This retrospective study was conducted on VAP patients presenting for treatment at tertiary care centre between May 2014 and March 2016. The case sheets of patients who have been treated for VAP with meropenem, antibiotic adjuvant entity (AAE) and colistin were analysed. RESULTS: Out of 113 patients analysed, 24 (21.3%) patients were having VAP due to MDR A. baumannii. Microbial sensitivity has shown that 87.5% of patients were sensitive to AAE and colistin whereas all of them were resistant to meropenem, imipenem and gentamycin. The mean treatment durations were 12.4±2.1, 13.2±2.4 and 14.3±2.1days for AAE, meropenem+colistin and AAE+colistin treatment groups. In AAE susceptible patients, the mean treatment duration and cost could be reduced by 23-24% and 43-53% if AAE is used empirically. In AAE-resistant patients, the mean treatment duration and cost could be reduced by 21% and 26% if AAE+colistin regime is used empirically instead of meropenem followed by AAE+colistin. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment with microbial eradication and pharmaco-economic evaluation clearly shows benefits in using AAE empirically in the management of A. baumannii infected VAP cases.

Assessment of early combination effects of colistin and meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in dynamic time-kill experiments.

BACKGROUND: In view of the paucity of clinical evidence, in vitro studies are needed to find antibiotic combinations effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Interpretation of in vitro effects is usually based on bacterial growth after 24 h in time-kill and checkerboard experiments. However, the clinical relevance of the effects observed in vitro is not established. In this study we explored alternative output parameters to assess the activities of colistin and meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. METHODS: Four strains each of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii were exposed to colistin and meropenem, alone and in combination, in 8 h dynamic time-kill experiments. Initial (1 h), maximum and 8 h bacterial reductions and the area under the bacterial time-kill curve were evaluated. Checkerboards, interpreted based on fractional inhibitory concentration indices after 24 h, were performed for comparison. RESULTS: In the time-kill experiments, the combination resulted in enhanced 1 h, maximum and 8 h bacterial reductions against 2, 3 and 5 of 8 strains, respectively, as compared to the single drugs. A statistically significant reduction in the area under the time-kill curve was observed for three strains. In contrast, the checkerboards did not identify synergy for any of the strains. CONCLUSIONS: Combination effects were frequently found with colistin and meropenem against P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii in time-kill experiments but were not detected with the checkerboard method. We propose that the early dynamics of bacterial killing and growth, which may be of great clinical importance, should be considered in future in vitro combination studies.

Substantial Impact of Altered Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on the Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem Evaluated via the Dynamic Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Critically ill patients frequently have substantially altered pharmacokinetics compared to non-critically ill patients. We investigated the impact of pharmacokinetic alterations on bacterial killing and resistance for commonly used meropenem dosing regimens. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate (MICmeropenem 0.25 mg/liter) was studied in the hollow-fiber infection model (inoculum ∼107.5 CFU/ml; 10 days). Pharmacokinetic profiles representing critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC), normal, or impaired renal function (creatinine clearances of 285, 120, or ∼10 ml/min, respectively) were generated for three meropenem regimens (2, 1, and 0.5 g administered as 8-hourly 30-min infusions), plus 1 g given 12 hourly with impaired renal function. The time course of total and less-susceptible populations and MICs were determined. Mechanism-based modeling (MBM) was performed using S-ADAPT. All dosing regimens across all renal functions produced similar initial bacterial killing (≤∼2.5 log10). For all regimens subjected to ARC, regrowth occurred after 7 h. For normal and impaired renal function, bacterial killing continued until 23 to 47 h; regrowth then occurred with 0.5- and 1-g regimens with normal renal function (fT>5×MIC = 56 and 69%, fCmin/MIC < 2); the emergence of less-susceptible populations (≥32-fold increases in MIC) accompanied all regrowth. Bacterial counts remained suppressed across 10 days with normal (2-g 8-hourly regimen) and impaired (all regimens) renal function (fT>5×MIC ≥ 82%, fCmin/MIC ≥ 2). The MBM successfully described bacterial killing and regrowth for all renal functions and regimens simultaneously. Optimized dosing regimens, including extended infusions and/or combinations, supported by MBM and Monte Carlo simulations, should be evaluated in the context of ARC to maximize bacterial killing and suppress resistance emergence.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Nonobese, Obese, and Morbidly Obese Patients.

The study objective was to evaluate meropenem population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Forty adult patients-11 nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30 kg/m2 ), 9 obese (30 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m2 ), and 20 morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 )-received meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours (q6h), q8h, or q12h or 1 g q6h or q8h, infused over 0.5 hour. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM, and 5000-patient Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to calculate probability of target attainment (PTA) for 5 dosing regimens, infused over 0.5 and 3 hours, using fT>MIC of 40%, 54%, and 100% of the dosing interval. A 2-compartment linear-elimination model best described the serum concentration-time data, and creatinine clearance was significantly associated with systemic clearance. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different among patient groups. In patients with creatinine clearances ≥50 mL/min, all simulated dosing regimens achieved >90% PTA at 40% fT>MIC in all patient groups at MICs ≤2 mg/L. Only 500 mg q8h, infused over 0.5 hour, did not achieve >90% PTA at 54% fT>MIC in nonobese and morbidly obese patients. At 100% fT>MIC, 1 g q6h and 2 g q8h, infused over 3 hours, reliably achieved >90% PTA in all patient groups. Meropenem pharmacokinetics are comparable among nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Standard dosing regimens provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposures for susceptible pathogens at 40% and 54% fT>MIC, but prolonged infusions of larger doses are needed for adequate exposures at 100% fT>MIC. Dosage adjustments based solely on body weight are unnecessary.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in elderly patients: dosing simulations based on renal function.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate different dosage regimens of meropenem in elderly patients in relation with renal function using a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model. METHODS: The data of 178 elderly patients treated with meropenem was collected from different sources. A popPK model was developed by using NONMEM® and the influence of different covariates on meropenem CL and V1 was observed. Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed at steady state to observe the % T > MIC for targets of 40, 60 and 80% of dosage intervals at different levels of creatinine clearance (CLCR). RESULTS: The data was described by a two-compartment model and the values of parameter estimates for CL, V1, Q and V2 were 5.27 L/h, 17.2 L, 9.92 L/h and 10.6 L, respectively. The CLCR, body weight and centre had a significant influence on meropenem CL while no direct influence of age was observed. Extended infusions had pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) breakpoint one dilution greater than corresponding short infusion regimens for each target of % T > MIC. CONCLUSION: Meropenem CL was significantly lower in the elderly compared to CL reported in younger patients due to the reduced renal function. An extended infusion of 1000 mg q8h can be considered for empirical treatment of infections in elderly patients when CLCR is ≤ 50 mL/min. A continuous infusion of 3000 mg daily dose is preferred if CLCR > 50 mL/min. However, a higher daily dose of meropenem would be required for resistant strains (MIC >8 mg/L) of bacteria if CLCR is >100 mL/min.

Evaluation of automated time-lapse microscopy for assessment of in vitro activity of antibiotics.

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of a new time-lapse microscopy based method (oCelloScope) to efficiently assess the in vitro antibacterial effects of antibiotics. Two E. coli and one P. aeruginosa strain were exposed to ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem and meropenem in 24-h experiments. Background corrected absorption (BCA) derived from the oCelloScope was used to detect bacterial growth. The data obtained with the oCelloScope were compared with those of the automated Bioscreen C method and standard time-kill experiments and a good agreement in results was observed during 6-24h of experiments. Viable counts obtained at 1, 4, 6 and 24h during oCelloScope and Bioscreen C experiments were well correlated with the corresponding BCA and optical density (OD) data. Initial antibacterial effects during the first 6h of experiments were difficult to detect with the automated methods due to their high detection limits (approximately 105CFU/mL for oCelloScope and 107CFU/mL for Bioscreen C), the inability to distinguish between live and dead bacteria and early morphological changes of bacteria during exposure to ciprofloxacin, ertapenem and meropenem. Regrowth was more frequently detected in time-kill experiments, possibly related to the larger working volume with an increased risk of pre-existing or emerging resistance. In comparison with Bioscreen C, the oCelloScope provided additional information on bacterial growth dynamics in the range of 105 to 107CFU/mL and morphological features. In conclusion, the oCelloScope would be suitable for detection of in vitro effects of antibiotics, especially when a large number of regimens need to be tested.

Optimising meropenem dosing in critically ill Australian Indigenous patients with severe sepsis.

Currently there are no pharmacokinetic (PK) data to guide antibiotic dosing in critically ill Australian Indigenous patients with severe sepsis. This study aimed to determine whether the population pharmacokinetics of meropenem were different between critically ill Australian Indigenous and critically ill Caucasian patients. Serial plasma and urine samples as well as clinical and demographic data were collected over two dosing intervals from critically ill Australian Indigenous patients. Plasma meropenem concentrations were assayed by validated chromatography. Concentration-time data were analysed with data from a previous PK study in critically ill Caucasian patients using Pmetrics. The population PK model was subsequently used for Monte Carlo dosing simulations to describe optimal doses for these patients. Six Indigenous and five Caucasian subjects were included. A two-compartment model described the data adequately, with meropenem clearance and volume of distribution of the central compartment described by creatinine clearance (CLCr) and patient weight, respectively. Patient ethnicity was not supported as a covariate in the final model. Significant differences were observed for meropenem clearance between the Indigenous and Caucasian groups [median 11.0 (range 3.0-14.1) L/h vs. 17.4 (4.3-30.3) L/h, respectively; P <0.01]. Standard dosing regimens (1 g intravenous every 8 h as a 30-min infusion) consistently achieved target exposures at the minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint in the absence of augmented renal clearance. No significant interethnic differences in meropenem pharmacokinetics between the Indigenous and Caucasian groups were detected and CLCr was found to be the strongest determinant of appropriate dosing regimens.

Detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacteriaceae using LC-MS/MS in comparison with the neo-rapid CARB kit using direct visual assessment and colorimetry.

It has been described that the sensitivity of the Carba NP test may be low in the case of OXA-48-like carbapenamases and mass spectrometry based methods as well as a colorimetry based method have been described as alternatives. We evaluated 84 Enterobacteriaceae isolates including 31 OXA-48-like producing isolates and 13 isolates that produced either an imipenemase (IMP; n=8), New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM; n=3), or Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC; n=2), as well as 40 carbapenemase negative Enterobacteriaceae isolates. We used the Neo-Rapid CARB kit, assessing the results with the unaided eye and compared it with a colorimetric approach. Furthermore, we incubated the isolates in growth media with meropenem and measured the remaining meropenem after one and 2h of incubation, respectively, using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Whilst all carbapenemase producing isolates with the exception of the OXA-244 producer tested positive for both the Neo-rapid CARB test using the unaided eye or colorimetry, and the 13 isolates producing either IMP, NDM or KPC hydrolysed the meropenem in the media almost completely after 2h of incubation, the 31 OXA-48-like producing isolates exhibited very variable hydrolytic activity when incubated in growth media with meropenem. In our study, the Neo-Rapid CARB test yielded a sensitivity of 98% for both the traditional and the colorimetric approach with a specificity of 95% and 100% respectively. Our results indicate that the Neo-Rapid CARB test may have use for the detection of OXA-48 type carbapenemases and that it may be particularly important to ensure bacterial lysis for the detection of these weaker hydrolysers.

Impact of piperacillin-tazobactam shortage on meropenem use: implications for antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Drug shortages pose a clear detriment to antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a piperacillin-tazobactam shortage on meropenem use, related costs, and associated changes in AS activity. A quasi-experimental quality improvement review compared adult patients receiving meropenem ≥72h three months pre-shortage and three months during the shortage. 320 patients were included (pre-shortage: 103; shortage: 217). Baseline characteristics were similar, but the length of stay was slightly longer in pre-shortage [19 (11-32) days] versus shortage [16 (11-32) days] (p=0.094). In pre-shortage and shortage, median days of therapy and estimated meropenem cost were 7 (5-11) and 7 (5-10) and $309.93 ($173.60-$507.03) and $255.30 ($204.24-$424.31), respectively (p=0.411 and p=0.050). Frequency of ID consultation was similar (16.8% in pre- and 25.3% in shortage, p=0.091). AS interventions increased during the shortage period (99 in pre-shortage and 205 in shortage). De-escalation occurred in 19.4% versus 32.7% of the patients in pre-shortage and shortage (p=0.014). The piperacillin-tazobactam shortage was associated with a 111% increase in meropenem prescriptions despite active AS, but was not associated with changes in mortality, length of therapy, or meropenem costs. AS should be aware that shortages may require proactive countermeasures to avoid inappropriate antimicrobial use during shortage periods.