MRI and 18F-FET PET for Multimodal Treatment Monitoring in Patients with Brain Metastases: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

PET using the radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) has been shown to be of value for treatment monitoring in patients with brain metastases after multimodal therapy, especially in clinical situations with equivocal MRI findings. As medical procedures must be justified socioeconomically, we determined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 18F-FET PET for treatment monitoring of multimodal therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, radiotherapy, and combinations thereof in patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: We analyzed already-published clinical data and calculated the associated costs from the German statutory health insurance system perspective. Two clinical scenarios were considered: decision tree model 1 determined the effectiveness of 18F-FET PET alone for identifying treatment-related changes, that is, the probability of correctly identifying patients with treatment-related changes confirmed by neuropathology or clinicoradiographically using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for immunotherapy. The resulting cost-effectiveness ratio showed the cost for each correctly identified patient with treatment-related changes in whom MRI findings remained inconclusive. Decision tree model 2 calculated the effectiveness of both 18F-FET PET and MRI, that is, the probability of correctly identifying nonresponders to treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness, that is, the cost for each additionally identified nonresponder by 18F-FET PET who would have remained undetected by MRI. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Results: 18F-FET PET identified 94% of patients with treatment-related changes, resulting in €1,664.23 (€1.00 = $1.08 at time of writing) for each correctly identified patient. Nonresponders were correctly identified in 60% by MRI and in 80% by 18F-FET PET, resulting in €3,292.67 and €3,915.83 for each correctly identified nonresponder by MRI and 18F-FET PET, respectively. The cost to correctly identify 1 additional nonresponder by 18F-FET PET, who would have remained unidentified by MRI, was €5,785.30. Conclusion: Given the considerable annual cost of multimodal therapy, the integration of 18F-FET PET can potentially improve patient care while reducing costs.

Informe de evaluación científica basada en la evidencia disponible: fenilcetonuria / Scientific evaluation report based on available evidence: phenylketonuria

INTRODUCCIÓN: La fenilcetonuria es una enfermedad congénita del metabolismo, causada en la mayoría de los casos por el déficit de la enzima hepática fenilalanina hidroxilasa, responsable de transformar la fenilalanina a tirosina, esto da como resultado concentraciones elevadas de fenilalanina y sus metabolitos, fenilacetato y fenilactato en sangre. Además la fenilalanina tendrá interferida su vía de transformación en tirosina, ya que la fenilalanina hidroxilasa no se habrá formado bien, lo que se traduce en un retardo mental. La incidencia de fenilcetonuria es de 13.500 a 19.000 nacimientos en EEUU. TECNOLOGÍAS SANITARIAS ANALIZADAS: La información sobre los efectos de la Sapropterina está basada en dos estudios. El resumen de los resultados es el siguiente. Los resultados arrojan que existe un beneficio del tratamiento de la Fenilcetonuria con Sapropterina para pacientes que responden a la misma. El tratamiento resultó eficaz en disminuir considerablemente la concentración de Fenililanina en sangre y una tolerancia mayor a la misma. A pesar de lo anterior, cabe destacar que es necesario estudios que consideren la efectividad de la Sapropterina en el largo plazo, que estudie desenlaces finales y no solo intermedios. A pesar de que existen estudios que consideran un período relativamente largo de estudio, dando indicios de buenos resultados del tratamiento con Sapropterina, se necesitan estudios que aborden la investigación con mayor control sobre la población (ensayos aleatorios controlados) para evaluar la efectividad en el largo plazo con mayor certeza. Es también importante mayor investigación que genere evidencia sobre los efectos del tratamiento según sea la severidad de la enfermedad, ya que los estudios encontrados no permiten tales aseveraciones. EFICACIA DE LOS TRATAMENTOS: La información sobre los efectos de la Sapropterina está basada en dos estudios. El resumen de los resultados es el siguiente. Los resultados arrojan que existe un beneficio del tratamiento de la Fenilcetonuria con Sapropterina para pacientes que responden a la misma. El tratamiento resultó eficaz en disminuir considerablemente la concentración de Fenililanina en sangre y una tolerancia mayor a la misma. A pesar de lo anterior, cabe destacar que es necesario estudios que consideren la efectividad de la Sapropterina en el largo plazo, que estudie desenlaces finales y no solo intermedios. A pesar de que existen estudios que consideran un período relativamente largo de estúdio , dando indicios de buenos resultados del tratamiento con Sapropterina, se necesitan estudios que aborden la investigación con mayor control sobre la población (ensayos aleatorios controlados) para evaluar la efectividad en el largo plazo con mayor certeza. Es también importante mayor investigación que genere evidencia sobre los efectos del tratamiento según sea la severidad de la enfermedad, ya que los estudios encontrados no permiten tales aseveraciones.. EVALUACIÓN ECONÓMICA: Se encontró una evaluación económica para sapropterina y dos reportes del CADTH y NHS. La evaluación económica corresponde a un análisis de costo-utilidad, realizado en Egipto, donde se compara Sapropterina versus dieta libre de fenilalanina en pacientes con diagnóstico de fenilcetonuria. Los autores concluyen que Sapropterina, en Egipto, no presenta una buena relación precio-calidad en comparación a dieta libre de fenilalanina. El impacto presupuestario supera la disponibilidad del fondo, por lo que no se continúa con la evaluación. CONCLUSIÓN: Para dar cumplimiento al artículo 28° del Reglamento que establece el proceso destinado a determinar los diagnósticos y tratamientos de alto costo con Sistema de Protección Financiera, según lo establecido en los artículos 7°y 8° de la ley N°20.850, aprobado por el decreto N°13 del Ministerio de Salud, se concluye que el presente informe de evaluación se considera no favorable, dado que su impacto presupuestario supera el 80% del fondo disponible, de acuerdo a lo establecido en el Título III. de las Evaluaciones Favorables de la Norma Técnica N° 0192 de este mismo Ministerio.

Tyrosine for Mitigating Stress and Enhancing Performance in Healthy Adult Humans, a Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine, a precursor of catecholamine neurotransmitters, may help alleviate physical/cognitive performance decrements in humans under conditions of high physical/psychological stress. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether supplemental tyrosine mitigates stress-induced decrements in cognitive and/or physical performance in healthy individuals using Samueli Institute's Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature methodology. METHODS: Key databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Agricola) were searched for randomized controlled trials from inception to October 2012. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines 50 criteria and Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework were used to assess the quality of individual studies and the overall literature pool, respectively. Controlled clinical trials were included later in the overall methodology. RESULTS: 10 randomized controlled trials and 4 controlled clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. On the basis of the available evidence, no recommendation could be made for the effect of tyrosine on physical performance under stressful physical conditions. However, a weak recommendation in favor of tyrosine was made for cognitive stress as all studies showed a positive effect. CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that the available evidence is insufficient to make confident recommendations on the effectiveness of tyrosine for mitigating stress effects on physical/cognitive performance. However, tyrosine may benefit cognitive performance and is worthy of further study.

Comparative assessment of platelet GpIIb/IIIa receptor occupancy ratio with Eptifibatide/Tirofiban in patients presenting with ACS and undergoing PCI.

BACKGROUND: The level of platelet inhibition by a Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb/IIIa) antagonist therapy necessary to minimize thrombotic complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a subject of debate. The degree of platelet inhibition obtained 10 min after start of GpIIb/IIIa antagonist therapy predicts adverse events after PCI. The aim of this study was to look at platelet inhibition and to compare platelet GpIIb/IIIa receptors occupancy ratio (GpRO) with Eptifibatide and Tirofiban using various dose regimens and correlate with 30-day clinical outcomes in patients presenting with high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing PCI. METHODS: The patients were divided into four sub groups: (1) Eptifibatide two intracoronary bolus (180 µg/kg) alone (E(B)); or (2) two intravenous bolus (180 µg/kg) followed by infusion at 2 µg/kg/min for 24 h (E(B + Inf)); and (3) Tirofiban standard bolus dose (0.4 µg/kg) over 30 min followed by infusion at 0.1 µg/kg/min (T(Std)); or (4) at ADVANCE dose bolus (25 µg/kg) over 3 min, followed by infusion at 0.1 µg/kg/min (T(Adv)). Number of GpIIb/IIIa receptors was assessed by flow cytometry at baseline and 10 min after the bolus and percentage of free receptors was determined to calculate the GpRO. Patients were followed for 30 days for any major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: 200 consecutive patients (including 74% with ST-elevation ACS) were enrolled. GpRO in groups E(B) (n = 48) and E(B + Inf) (n = 44) were 62.7% ± 27.2% and 61.4% ± 6.1% respectively while in the groups T(Std) (n = 96) and T(Adv) (n = 12) groups were 35.1% ± 17.74% and 68.8% ± 27.3% respectively. The GpRO was similar in E(B), E(B + Inf) and T(Adv) groups and was significantly higher than T(Std) group (p < 0.0001). The 30-day MACE rates in E(B) (4.2%), E(B + Inf) (4.5%) and T(Adv) (4.2%) were significantly lower than T(Std) group (12.5%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Standard dose Tirofiban results in significantly lower rates of GpIIb/IIIa receptor occupancy ratio and this correlated with higher incidence of 30-day MACE in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Would tirofiban have been shown non-inferior to abciximab had the TENACITY trial not been terminated for financial reasons?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether tirofiban would have been non-inferior to abciximab had the trial completed enrollment and place the termination of this trial in a broader research ethics context. BACKGROUND: TENACITY was terminated by the sponsor for financial reasons. At the time, event rates for the 2 treatment arms were unknown. METHODS: TENACITY was designed to compare tirofiban with abciximab in approximately 8,000 patients; however, enrollment was terminated after 383 (4.8%) patients. The primary end-point was a composite of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization. Non-inferiority was defined as the likelihood that tirofiban would preserve at least 50% of the ability of abciximab to reduce the primary end-point at 30 days, based on abciximab's demonstrated ability to reduce such events by 43% (relative risk, 0.573; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.507-0.648; P < 0.001). To determine the probability of non-inferiority given the patients already enrolled, a Bayesian approach was used. RESULTS: The primary composite end-point occurred in 8.8% of patients randomized to abciximab versus 6.9% receiving high-bolus-dose tirofiban (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.37-1.64). The estimated conditional power for the test that tirofiban would be non-inferior to abciximab if all patients been enrolled is 93.7%. Using the estimated predictive power method, the likelihood was 84.8%. CONCLUSIONS: TENACITY was well powered to identify non-inferiority with tirofiban versus abciximab, and the patients enrolled strengthened the probability that this would have been the outcome had the trial been completed. When a clinical trial is terminated solely for financial reasons, it is incumbent upon the sponsor to provide proper patient follow-up and publication of the findings.

Current strategies with high-dose tirofiban.

The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor is a platelet-specific adhesion receptor that mediates the formation of platelet aggregates. Pharmacologic blockade of the receptor is associated with a reduction in major cardiovascular adverse events after percutaneous coronary interventions and in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. Three intravenous GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors are available: abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide. Tirofiban is a small, synthetic non-peptide, competitive GP IIb/IIIa antagonist with high specificity and high affinity for the GP IIb/IIIa receptor. In a head-to-head comparison, tirofiban 10-microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.15-microg/kg/min infusion was found to be inferior to standard dose of abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Insufficient platelet inhibition with low-dose tirofiban may likely explain these results. Subsequently, a high-bolus dose of tirofiban (25 microg/kg bolus) followed by standard infusion was tested and evidence suggest that in this dosing tirofiban may be as effective as abciximab and have a comparable safety profile. Therefore, high-bolus dose tirofiban may be an appealing and cost-effective alternative to abciximab. However, further testing is warranted given the short follow up and limited statistical power of the available data.

Bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in drug-eluting stent implantations in the absence of acute myocardial infarction: clinical and economic results.

BACKGROUND: The use of bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary interventions has been shown to be clinically safe and effective, and may be associated with shorter hospital stays and lower costs than heparin + glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition. This study compared the utilization, clinical outcomes and costs associated with the planned use of bivalirudin versus heparin + GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in drug-eluting stent (DES) patients without acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 1,842 patients who underwent DES placement between May 2003 and December 2004. Planned treatment with heparin + GP IIb/IIIa inhibition was administered to 1,305 and planned bivalirudin alone was administered to 537 patients. Clinical follow ups (mean = 782 +/- 204 days) were obtained via telephone or mailed surveys in 1,813 patients (98.4%). Propensity analysis was utilized to adjust for between-groups baseline differences. RESULTS: The unadjusted data revealed similar in-hospital outcomes in both groups. After propensity adjustment, the rate of vascular complications was significantly lower in the bivalirudin-treated group (0.2% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.04). At 1 year, clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. The overall unadjusted and adjusted cost analysis revealed similar mean hospital costs (11,384 U.S. dollars vs. 11,018 U.S. dollars; p = ns) and length of stay (2.9 days vs. 2.8 days; p = ns) in both groups. The unadjusted and adjusted mean hospital costs were significantly lower in patients treated with bivalirudin versus patients who received heparin + abciximab. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that bivalirudin is a safe, cost-effective alternative to heparin + GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients undergoing DES in the absence of acute MI.

Comparison of abciximab with "high-dose" tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The TARGET study has been criticised for sub-optimal platelet inhibition with tirofiban. We aimed to compare a high-dose bolus regimen of tirofiban (hd-tirofiban) to standard dose of abciximab for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients who received either hd-tirofiban (25 mcg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 mcg/kg/min infusion for 18 h) or standard dose abciximab. In-hospital and 6-month outcomes were obtained in all cases. RESULTS: Over an 18-month period, 109 patients who received hd-tirofiban were compared with 110 patients who received abciximab. Both hd-tirofiban and abciximab groups had acute coronary syndromes in 86% and 80% and diabetes in 10% and 13% respectively. Most patients had coronary stent implantation (96% vs. 98%). Thrombocytopenia (platelet count< 100,000) developed in 0.9% of patients receiving hd-tirofiban and 2% of patients receiving abciximab (p = 0.566). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 7.3% and 3% of patients respectively (p = 0.118). Peri-procedural troponin rise was 0.9% in patients receiving hd-tirofiban and 5.5% in patients receiving abciximab (p = 0.07). MACE (Myocardial infarction, Stroke, Revascularisation and Death) at 6 months was 23% in the hd-tirofiban group and 20% in the abciximab group (p = 0.711). The pharmaceutical costs were AUD 322 for hd-tirofiban (one ampoule) and AUD 1,350 for abciximab (3 ampoules). CONCLUSION: There was a small increase in bleeding requiring transfusion and a lower rate of peri-procedural troponin rise in the hd-tirofiban group however, the overall 6-month MACE rates were similar in both groups. There was a considerable cost-saving with the use of hd-tirofiban. A prospective randomised trial of hd-tirofiban vs. abciximab is warranted.

Choice of GPIIb/IIIa antagonist in percutaneous coronary intervention: how should economic criteria be factored in?

OBJECTIVE: Three GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are available in the market. In France, as in many countries, their acquisition costs strongly differ. The objective of this study was to analyze how economic criteria-beyond the acquisition cost-should be factored in, when choosing a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist. METHOD: Both clinical and economic papers on the use of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists in percutaneous coronary interventions published in peer-review journals from 1994 to 2002 were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Cost differentials between products strongly vary from one 'cost concept' to another, i.e., acquisition cost, administration cost, hospital cost, net treatment cost. The comparison of efficacy is even more complicated, as most of the time only indirect comparisons are available, based on different clinical studies, with different durations and definitions of outcomes. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios range from US dollar 10,695 per avoided event for eptifibatide (IMPACT II study) to US dollar 74,047 for tirofiban (RESTORE study). CONCLUSION: The concept of cost, inevitably entering into the choice of a medicinal strategy, must be used with caution. The amplitude of the difference between products, and the product favored by the difference, vary according to the cost concept retained.

High-dose bolus tirofiban and sirolimus eluting stent versus abiciximab and bare metal stent in acute myocardial infarction (STRATEGY) study--protocol design and demography of the first 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Primary bare metal stenting and abciximab infusion are currently considered the best available reperfusion strategy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Sirolimus eluting stents (SES), compared to bare metal stent (BMS), greatly reduce the incidence of binary restenosis and target vessel revascularisation (TVR), but their use on a routine basis results in a significant increase in medical costs. With current European list prices, the use of tirofiban instead of abciximab would save enough money to absorb the difference between SES and BMS. AIM: To assess whether in patients with STEMI the combination of SES with high dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban results in a similar incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) but in a lower binary restenosis rate after six months compared to BMS and abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: 160 patients are required to satisfy the primary composite end-point, including MACE and binary restenosis. The study is ongoing: the current paper focuses on the methodology and demography of the first 100 patients so far enrolled. Patients randomised to HDB tirofiban (n = 50, mean age: 62 +/- 12, 40 males) and abciximab (n = 50, mean age: 63 +/- 12, 38 males) do not differ for medical history, presentation profile, medications at discharge, angiographic profile and creatine-kinase MB-fraction at peak. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the trial will be available by the end of 2004: they will be crucial for the cardiologists to know whether the gold standard for AMI treatment should be reconsidered after the introduction of SES into the clinical practice.

Combined assessment of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade, myocardial perfusion grade, and ST-segment resolution to evaluate epicardial and myocardial reperfusion.

The restoration of epicardial and myocardial flow remains the primary goal of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, but the optimal method to assess this goal has not been defined. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade (TFG), myocardial perfusion grade (MPG), and ST-segment resolution (STRes) were combined to formulate a new measure of successful reperfusion in 649 patients who received pharmacologic reperfusion therapy in 3 recent phase II clinical trials of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiograms and electrocardiograms were analyzed at 60 minutes (before any intervention) after the initiation of reperfusion therapy. The complete restoration of perfusion, or the "trifecta," defined as the presence of TFG 3, MPG 3, and complete (> or =70%) STRes, occurred in 117 patients (18%). The achievement of this trifecta was associated with low rates of 30-day mortality (0% vs 3.9%, p = 0.02), congestive heart failure (CHF) (0.9% vs 7.1%, p = 0.01), and the combination of death or CHF (0.9% vs 10.7%, p = 0.001). When the results were stratified with respect to subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 60 to 120 minutes, attainment of the trifecta at 60 minutes remained a strong predictor of better clinical outcomes, particularly in those patients who underwent early PCI. The achievement of TFG 3, MPG 3, and complete STRes at 60 minutes after fibrinolytic therapy and before PCI occurred in only 18% of patients but was associated with very low rates of death and CHF at 30 days. This new end point is proposed to evaluate the success of reperfusion therapy in patients who undergo early angiography.

Implications of upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary artery stenting in the invasive management of unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB trial and the Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-TIMI 18 trial.

BACKGROUND: TIMI IIIB and TACTICS-TIMI 18 were 2 trials of an early invasive strategy in unstable angina (UA)/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) that were conducted nearly a decade apart but with virtually identical enrollment criteria and designs, except that upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition was mandated and coronary artery stenting was routinely used in TACTICS-TIMI 18. We sought to examine the effect of these advances on clinical outcomes and the benefits of an early invasive strategy in UA/NSTEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were stratified on the basis of their TIMI risk score into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories. Within each risk category, the rates of clinical outcomes and the benefit of an early invasive strategy were compared. Compared with patients in TIMI IIIB and adjusting for baseline risk, patients in TACTICS-TIMI 18 had lower rates of death, MI, or rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes (OR, 0.62; P<0.0001). Across both trials, the benefit of an early invasive strategy was significantly greater with increasing baseline risk: OR, 1.39 in low-risk, 0.80 in intermediate-risk, and 0.57 in high-risk patients (P< or =0.004 for interactions). After adjustment for baseline risk, an early invasive strategy tended toward a more favorable result in TACTICS-TIMI 18 than in TIMI IIIB (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Advances in the care of patients with UA/NSTEMI, including glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and stenting, were associated with lower rates of death, MI, and rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes and a trend toward a greater benefit of an early invasive strategy.

Differential expression of cardiac biomarkers by gender in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a TACTICS-TIMI 18 (Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 18) substudy.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women is more difficult because of lower specificity of symptoms and diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive testing. We sought to examine the relationship between gender and cardiac biomarkers in patients with unstable angina (UA)/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the TACTICS-TIMI 18, OPUS-TIMI 16, and TIMI 11 studies, baseline samples were analyzed in the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) biomarker core laboratory. We examined the relationship between gender and elevated biomarkers. Of 1865 patients from TACTICS-TIMI 18, 34% were women. Fewer women had elevated creatine kinase-MB or troponins, whereas more had elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or brain natriuretic peptide. Presence of ST-segment deviation and TIMI risk scores were not significantly different. This pattern was confirmed in TIMI 11 and OPUS-TIMI 16. The prognostic value of the markers in TACTICS-TIMI 18 was similar in women and men. When a multimarker approach was examined, a greater proportion of high-risk women were identified. Marker-positive patients of both genders had improved outcome with an invasive strategy; however, marker-negative women appeared to have improved outcomes with a conservative strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UA/NSTEMI, there was a different pattern of presenting biomarkers. Men were more likely to have elevated creatine kinase-MB and troponins, whereas women were more likely to have elevated C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide. This suggests that a multimarker approach may aid the initial risk assessment of UA/NSTEMI, especially in women. Further research is necessary to elucidate whether gender-related pathophysiological differences exist in presentation with acute coronary syndromes.

National economic impact of tirofiban for unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation; example from the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation are a major health and economic burden. Treatments such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists like tirofiban reduce the risk of complications but the cost impact of these agents including cost offsets of avoiding complications are needed particularly in Europe. METHODS: We used treatment patterns from the Prospective Registry of Acute Ischemic Syndromes in the UK, risk reductions derived from the PRISM-PLUS trial and cost estimates from the CHKS database to estimate the impact of tirofiban on PRAIS-UK patients with and without complications and subgroups at higher risk of complications. These subgroups (and proportions) were patients: (1) aged 60 or over with abnormal electrocardiograms (58%), (2) with ST depression or bundle branch block on admission (30%) and (3) with ST depression, bundle branch block or MI on admission (37%). RESULTS: Total cost of care in the UK at 6 months for the estimated 87339 acute coronary syndromes admissions annually was pound 213 million, which would increase by pound 33 million (15.7%) if tirofiban were given to all patients, avoiding 2422 complications at a mean cost per event avoided of pound 13388. Among the subgroups, the mean cost per event avoided ranges from pound 10856 for subgroup 1 to pound 5953 for subgroup 3. Treating the latter subgroup, would avoid 1977 events at a cost of pound 12 million (5.5%). CONCLUSION: The use of tirofiban in the UK to treat acute coronary syndromes patients without ST elevation provides an important therapeutic advantage at modest proportional increase in cost, particularly if targeted to higher risk subgroups as recommended in the European guidelines.

Risk-benefit analysis of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes.

Four intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPIs) (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban and lamifiban) have been tested extensively over the last decade for their efficacy and safety in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). GPIs are well-established adjunct agents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and considerable effort has gone into evaluating these agents in patients who are not scheduled to undergo coronary revascularisation. In the current article, six major randomised clinical trials conducted in the latter patient population are reviewed. Based on a recent meta-analysis of these trials, GPIs reduced the incidence of death or myocardial infarction in patients not scheduled for early revascularisation, with the greatest reduction observed in patients at high risk of thrombotic complications. Major bleeding complications were more frequent in those receiving GPIs, however, the incidences of intracranial haemorrhage and stroke were similar in both treatment groups. Despite these risks, the benefits of GPI therapy in addition to conventional treatment, such as aspirin and heparin, should be considered for these high-risk patients.

Cost and effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who received adjunctive therapy with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were studied. Data from a national all-payer database for the period from January 2000 to July 2001 were analyzed to compare in-hospital mortality, complications, incremental costs, and length of stay between AMI patients who did and did not receive a GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitor during PCI. Risk adjustment was performed by logistic regression to account for differences in patient and institutional characteristics. Complications were evaluated as a composite of cardiac, noncardiac, procedural, and nonprocedural complications. Incremental costs and length of stay were analyzed by least-squares regression. A total of 32,529 patients in 99 hospitals were included. Only abciximab had a significant benefit for risk-adjusted mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59-0.92, p = 0.007) and shorter length of stay (0.21 day, 95% CI = 0.09-0.34 day, p = 0.0013) compared with the controls. Eptifibatide was associated with fewer complications (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.98, p = 0.02), and tirofiban incurred the lowest incremental cost ($644, OR = $252-$1,036, p < 0.0001), but abciximab had the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio ($14,515 per life-year gained). Information from a large database supported the use of GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. Treatment with abciximab was associated with favorable differences in survival, cost-effectiveness, and length of stay compared to treatment without a GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitor.

Access to new cardiovascular therapies in Canadian hospitals: a national survey of the formulary process.

BACKGROUND: Access to new therapies in hospitals depends upon both clinical trial evidence and local Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) committee approval. The process of formulary evaluation by P&T committees is not well-understood. OBJECTIVES: To describe the formulary decision-making process in Canadian hospitals for cardiovascular medications recently made available on the Canadian market. METHODS: Postal survey of hospital pharmacy directors in all Canadian hospitals with more than 50 beds. Target drugs included abciximab, enoxaparin, dalteparin, clopidogrel, eptifibatide and tirofiban. RESULTS: Of 428 surveys mailed, responses were received from 164 P&T committees representing 350 hospitals for an effective response rate of 82%. While physicians make up the largest proportion of committee membership, pharmacists play an influential role. Information most commonly cited as influencing formulary decisions included published clinical trials (97%), regional guidelines (90%), pharmacoeconomic data (84%), decisions at peer hospitals (73%) and local opinion leaders (60%). However, this information was often not required on formulary applications. Approval timelines varied widely for target medications but there were no regional, hospital or P&T committee characteristics that were independent predictors of early formulary application or approval. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability in the time taken for Canadian institutions to adopt new cardiovascular therapies, which is not explained by regional, hospital or P&T committee characteristics. Standardization of the formulary application and evaluation processes, including sharing of information amongst institutions, would lead to broader understanding of the applicable issues, more objectivity and improved efficiency.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists: a comparative review of their use in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Antiplatelet therapy is critical during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as it reduces the incidence of abrupt closure and distal thrombi embolization, which are significant acute peri-procedural complications likely responsible for the clinical adverse outcomes with PCI, namely death, myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularization. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, potent antiplatelet agents, have been specifically tested during PCI. There are currently three commercially available GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and results from more than ten randomized clinical PCI trials have established their clinical efficacy and tolerability during coronary intervention. There remain questions regarding variability in efficacy among individual clinical trials and among population subsets, potential clinical differences among the available agents, and their optimal use. This article will critically review the body of evidence for clinical efficacy and tolerability of each individual tested compound, highlight potential differences among agents, and raise important issues involving their use in clinical practice.

Relationship between baseline white blood cell count and degree of coronary artery disease and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a TACTICS-TIMI 18 (Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy- Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 18 trial)substudy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the relationship between baseline white blood cell (WBC) count and angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with unstable angina (UA)/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and to see if WBC count was a significant predictor of outcomes independent of other biomarkers. BACKGROUND: Inflammation has been shown to play a role in atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between baseline WBC count, other baseline variables and biomarkers, angiographic findings, and clinical outcomes in 2,208 patients in the Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 18 (TACTICS-TIMI 18) trial. RESULTS: Higher baseline WBC counts were associated with lower Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades (p = 0.0045) and TIMI myocardial perfusion grades (p = 0.03) as well as a greater extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) (p < 0.0001). A higher baseline WBC count was predictive of higher six-month mortality, ranging from 1.5% to 3.6% to 5.1% for patients with low, intermediate, and high WBC counts, respectively (p = 0.0017). In a multivariable proportional hazards model, patients with a low C-reactive protein (CRP) but an elevated WBC remained at significantly higher risk of death at six months (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, p = 0.049), and patients with a high CRP were at even higher risk (HR 8.6, p = 0.004). conclusions: In patients with UA/NSTEMI, elevations in a simple, widely available blood test, the WBC count, were associated with impaired epicardial and myocardial perfusion, more extensive CAD, and higher six-month mortality. After adjustment for traditional risk factors and other biomarkers, assessment of two inflammatory markers, WBC count and CRP, can be used to stratify patients across an eightfold gradation of six-month mortality risk.