Assessment of large-diameter and small-diameter SoftK specialty contact lenses for early-stage keratoconus.

INTRODUCTION: Soft contact lenses may be a good alternative for early-stage keratoconus (KC) patients who do not tolerate rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses due to ocular discomfort or complications. This prospective study compared outcomes obtained after 2 weeks of wearing two types of soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses for keratoconus that varied in their diameter and central thickness (cc). METHODS: Patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades I or II KC were fitted with small-diameter (14.2 or 14.8 mm) SoftK (SD-SoftK, cc = 0.48 mm) and large-diameter (17 mm) SoftK (LD-SoftK, cc = 0.60 mm) lenses, each worn for 2 weeks in a crossover design. Low (10%;10VA) and high (100%;100VA) contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS, Pelli-Robson), higher order aberrations (HOAs, Visionix Vx130), the number of trial lens modifications during fitting and the subjectively preferred lens were compared using Friedman tests with post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Forty eyes (N = 20, 10 males, mean age: 39.0 ± 9.9 years, range: 23-55 years) were examined. Their habitual median (interquartile1, interquartile3) 10VA (LogMAR), 100VA (LogMAR) and CS (LogCS) were 0.52 (0.30, 0.50), 0.14 (0.10, 0.15) and 1.35 (1.35, 1.50), respectively. For the SD-SoftK condition, the values were 0.23 (0.17, 0.30), 0.02 (0.00, 0.05) and 1.50 (1.50, 1.65), respectively. For the LD-SoftK condition, the respective values were 0.36 (0.27, 0.44), 0.09 (0.05, 0.13) and 1.50 (1.50, 1.60). SD-SoftK lenses significantly improved 10VA compared with habitual and LD-SoftK. SD-SoftK also significantly improved CS compared with habitual, but not LD-SoftK. LD-SoftK significantly improved spherical aberration compared with uncorrected (0.03 ± 0.10 µ vs. 0.07 ± 0.13 µ) but not SD-SoftK (0.04 ± 0.07 µ). Both lenses required a mean of 1.5 modifications prior to final lens fitting. Fewer adverse events were seen with SD-SoftK (N = 3) compared with LD-SoftK (N = 8), and 75% of participants preferred SD-SoftK lenses. CONCLUSION: SD-SoftK lenses were preferred by 75% of subjects, were associated with fewer adverse events and significantly improved 10VA compared with LD-SoftK lenses. SD-SoftK lenses also significantly improved CS compared with the habitual correction, but this did not differ significantly from the LD-SoftK lenses.

Assessment by the Scheimpflug imaging system of corneal clarity and anterior segment properties in rosacea patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of rosacea on ocular surface changes such as alterations in dry eye parameters, corneal densitometry, and aberrations, in comparison with healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 88 eyes of 44 patients diagnosed with rosacea and 88 eyes of 44 healthy controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent a comprehensive dermatologic and ophthalmic examination and Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer-1 tests were performed. The rosacea subtype and Demodex count and OSDI scores of all participants were recorded. Corneal topographic, densitometric, and aberrometric measurements were obtained using the Scheimpflug imaging system. RESULTS: The mean age of the 44 patients was 41.2 ±â€¯11.0 years of whom 31 (70.5%) were female. The mean TBUT and Schirmer-1 test values were significantly decreased and OSDI scores were significantly increased in the rosacea group compared to healthy controls (p < 0.01 for all). The most common subtype of rosacea was erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (70.4%). The severity grading of rosacea revealed that 18 (40.9%) patients had moderate erythema. The median (min-max) Demodex count was 14.0 (0-120) and the disease duration was 24.0 (5-360) months. The comparison of the corneal densitometry values revealed that the densitometry measurements in all concentric zones, especially in central and posterior zones were higher in rosacea patients. Corneal aberrometric values in the posterior surface were also lower in the rosacea group compared to healthy controls. The topographic anterior chamber values were significantly lower in the rosacea group. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size, variable time interval to hospital admission, and lack of follow-up data are among the limitations of the study. Future studies with larger sample sizes may also enlighten the mechanisms of controversial anterior segment findings by evaluating rosacea patients who have uveitis and those who do not. CONCLUSION: Given the fact that ocular signs may precede cutaneous disease, rosacea is frequently underrecognized by ophthalmologists. Therefore, a comprehensive examination of the ocular surface and assessment of the anterior segment is essential. The main priority of the ophthalmologist is to treat meibomian gland dysfunction and Demodex infection to prevent undesired ocular outcomes.

Repeatability assessment of anterior segment measurements in myopic patients using an anterior segment OCT with placido corneal topography and agreement with a swept-source OCT.

BACKGROUND: The precision of anterior segment biometric measurements in eyes has become increasingly important in refractive surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the repeatability of the automatic measurements provided by a new spectral-domain optical coherence tomograph (SD-OCT)/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO) and its agreement with a swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) biometer (CASIA SS-1000, Tomey) in patients with myopia. METHODS: The right eye of 235 subjects was scanned 3 times with both devices. The evaluated parameters included central corneal radius of the steep meridian, central corneal radius of the flat meridian, mean central corneal radius, thinnest corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, corneal volume and diameter. The intraobserver repeatability of the MS-39 measurements was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within subject standard deviation, coefficient of repeatability, coefficient of variation and repeated-measures analysis of variance of the 3 repeated measurements. The agreement between the two devices was evaluated by 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: The majority of the parameters acquired from MS-39 showed high repeatability. The repeatability of corneal diameter was slightly lower than the other measurements, although the ICC remained high. Agreement with the CASIA SS-1000 was good, indicated by the Bland-Altman plots with narrow 95% LoA values for all parameters assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The high repeatability of automatic measurements by the new device supports its clinical application in eyes with myopia, and the good agreement between the two devices indicates they could be used interchangeably for the parameters evaluated.

Assessment of corneal parameters in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: To assess the corneal parameters in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: We enrolled 64 patients with RA (32 receiving biologic and 32 receiving conventional drugs) and 32 healthy subjects. Keratometric values (anterior flat [K1], steep [K2], and mean keratometry [Km]), corneal thickness from the pupil center (CCT), apex (ACT), and the thinnest point (TCT), and corneal volume (CV) were measured and compared between the groups. RESULTS: K1, K2, and Km values were significantly higher in the RA group (P = 0.013, P = 0.048, P = 0.027, respectively). The means of CCT, ACT, TCT, and CV were significantly lower in RA patients (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.011, respectively). When we divided RA patients into two groups according to the treatment and compared them to controls, the differences in K1, CCT, ACT, TCT and CV were significant (P = 0.030, P = 0.005, P = 0.001, P = 0.001, P = 0.034, respectively). K1 and CV values of RA-biologic group were similar to the control group (P = 0.205 and P = 0.127, respectively). CONCLUSION: Biologic agents contribute to the improvement of K1 and CV values in patients with RA.

Assessment of dynamic corneal response parameters in Chinese patients of different ages with myopia and orthokeratology lenses using the Corvis ST.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of orthokeratology lenses (OK lenses) on corneal biomechanics in subjects of different ages. METHODS: Fifty subjects with mild to moderate myopia were categorized into three groups (Group I-III) based on their age. Corvis ST was used to collect dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs) at different follow-up time points. Repeated measures analysis of variance combined with simple effect analysis was used to analyze the changes in DCRs in different groups during the follow-up period. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the correlations between axial length growth (ALG) at 6 months (ALG-6M) or 12 months (ALG-12M) and sex, baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and DCRs. RESULTS: The DCRs changed in all three groups after wearing OK lenses. Most DCRs showed significant differences between baseline and 6 months after wearing OK lenses, while the differences between DCRs at 6 months and 12 months were not statistically significant. No significant differences in DCRs were observed among the three groups at the same follow-up time point. Additionally, at 6 months post-OK lens wear, ALG-6M was significantly correlated with velocity of the corneal apex at the first applanation (A1V-6M) (P = 0.002), Corvis biomechanical index (CBI-6M) (P = 0.004), the maximum amount of corneal movement (DAM-6M) (P = 0.010), deformation amplitude ratio of 2 mm (DAR2-6M) (P = 0.010), and stress-strain index (SSI-6M) (P = 0.038) in Group I. Furthermore, ALG-12M showed significant correlations with SSI-6M (P = 0.031), peak distance at the DAM (PD)-6M (P = 0.037), baseline Ambrósio Relational Thickness to the horizontal profile (P = 0.013) in Group I. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of DCRs displayed significant changes within the initial 6 months of OK lens wear. Minimal variation in DCRs was observed across different age groups at the same follow-up time point. Certain DCR parameters exhibited correlations with ALG, suggesting their potential in predicting ALG in myopic children undergoing OK lenses correction.

Factors Associated With Receipt of Crosslinking for Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with receipt of standard fluence epithelium-off crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus (KCN). METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study reviewed electronic health records of treatment-naive patients with KCN seen at the Wilmer Eye Institute between January 2017 and September 2020. Tomographic data were derived from Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) devices. Multivariable population-average model using generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, sex, race, national area deprivation index, vision correction method, and disease severity was used to identify factors associated with receipt of CXL. RESULTS: From 583 patients with KCN, 97 (16.6%) underwent CXL for KCN. Patients who received CXL in at least 1 eye were significantly younger (mean 24.0 ± 7.8 years) than patients who had never undergone CXL (33.4 ± 9.3 years) ( P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, Black patients had 63% lower odds of receiving CXL for KCN (OR: 0.37, 95% CI, 0.18-0.79) versus White patients, and older age was protective against receipt of CXL (OR: 0.89 per 1-year increase, 95% CI, 0.86-0.93). Comparison of characteristics by race demonstrated that Black patients presented with significantly worse vision, higher keratometric indices (K1, K2, and Kmax), and thinner corneal pachymetry at baseline versus White or Asian patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical cohort of patients with KCN from a tertiary referral center, Black patients were less likely to receive CXL presumably because of more advanced disease at presentation. Earlier active population screening may be indicated to identify and treat these patients before they become ineligible for treatment and develop irreversible vision loss. Such strategies may improve health equity in KCN management.

A Comprehensive Wavefront Assessment of Keratoconus Using an Integrated Scheimpflug Corneal Tomographer/Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Aberrometer.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in different severities of keratoconus (KC) from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and whole eye using an integrated Scheimpflug corneal tomographer/Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer. METHODS: This study included eyes with clinical KC, topographic KC (no clinical signs), fellow eyes with very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography and no clinical signs (VAE-NT), and control eyes. Corneal and ocular wavefront aberrations were obtained using an integrated Scheimpflug tomographer/Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer. The diagnostic capability of distinguishing VAE-NT from the control was also tested. RESULTS: This study included 68 eyes with clinical KC, 44 with topographic KC, 26 with VAE-NT, and 45 controls. Clinical KC had significantly greater total HOAs and coma from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and whole eye than the other groups ( P <0.05). Although topographic KC had significantly greater values in all wavefront parameters than the control ( P <0.05), ocular and corneal HOAs did not differ between the VAE-NT and control groups. The coma from the anterior cornea in topographic KC was significantly greater than that in VAE-NT ( P <0.05); the coma from the posterior cornea and whole eye did not differ. Total HOAs from the anterior corneal surface exhibited the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.774 (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 78%). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive wavefront assessment can be used to quantitatively evaluate corneal and ocular HOAs across various severity of KC. Total HOAs from the anterior corneal surface exhibited the potential ability in distinguishing VAE-NT from the control eyes.

Real-world socioeconomic determinants of corneal crosslinking in a national cohort.

PURPOSE: To characterize recent socioeconomic trends in patients with keratoconus/corneal ectasias undergoing corneal crosslinking (CXL). SETTING: A deidentified administrative medical claims database comprised commercial and Medicare Advantage health claims from across the United States. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. METHODS: This study identified 552 patients with keratoconus/corneal ectasia who underwent CXL and 2723 matched controls who did not undergo CXL based on Current Procedural Terminology coding from a U.S. national insurance claims database from 2016 to 2020. For each patient, characteristics, including sex, race, age, household net worth, education level, insurance plan type, and geographic region, were extracted. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to determine the odds of undergoing crosslinking. RESULTS: Age 30 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, P < .001) was associated with decreased likelihood of undergoing CXL. Sex, race, education, and patient income were not associated with odds of undergoing CXL. Patients with health maintenance organization insurance had lower odds of undergoing CXL (OR, 0.64, P = .047). Geographically, patients on the east coast (OR, 0.37, P < .001) and Lower Midwest (OR, 0.31, P < .001) had statistically lower odds of undergoing crosslinking. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify socioeconomic determinants of CXL, and it highlights that geographic location and insurance type may limit accessibility to patients.

Observation and assessment of the immediate use of a silicon hydrogel contact lens after transepithelial corneal cross linking: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Transepithelial corneal crosslinking (CXL) is a novel surgical approach for the treatment of keratoconus, which is a bilateral asymmetrical ophthalmological disease accompanied by progressive corneal ectasia. Silicon hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses have been extensively used in clinical ophthalmologic medicine, as a postoperative ophthalmological intervention. However, the ideal lens application duration after transepithelial CXL remains uncertain. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects and comfort of immediate corneal contact lens use after transepithelial CXL for keratoconus. METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 patients with keratoconus who underwent transepithelial CXL treatment were enrolled from September 2021 to January 2023 with a male:female ratio of 39:21, and an average age of 25.42 ± 5.47 years. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: group A contained 30 patients wearing silicone hydrogel contact lenses for 7 days postoperatively, and group B contained 30 patients wearing the same contact lenses for 3 days. Ten subjective ophthalmologic symptoms were surveyed by the patients, including pain, photophobia, foreign body sensation, tearing, burning, blurred vision, dry eyes, difficulty opening the eyes, astringency, and stinging. Ophthalmologic signs, including corneal edema and conjunctival congestion, were recorded by a single clinician on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. RESULTS: Each surgical procedure was readily performed without complications, and both groups postoperative day 7 (P = 0.04), where group B scored (0.01 ± 0.41) lesser than group A (0.12 ± 0.29), whilst corneal edema in both groups recorded significantly different on postoperative days 5 and 7 (group A demonstrated the result of 0.17 ± 0.14 and 0.08 ± 0.11 for the respective days, whereas group B indicated 0.10 ± 0.13 and 0.03 ± 0.07 at the corresponding times). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate use of silicone hydrogel corneal lenses after transepithelial CXL effectively alleviates postoperative ocular distress, particularly with a three-day use period as the ideal duration.

[Comparison of corneal power assessment methods after small incision lenticule extraction].

Objective: To compare the accuracy of different corneal curvature parameters in assessing the corneal refractive status and tracking corneal power changes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study tracked and recorded total corneal curvature parameters measured by different instruments before and three months after SMILE for myopia. These parameters, including total keratometry (TK) from the IOLMaster 700, total corneal refractive power (TCRP) from the Pentacam AXL, real keratometry (RK) from the CASIA 2, and corrected parameters calculated using the Haigis, Shammas, and Maloney methods, were compared with data obtained using the clinical history method (CHM). Surgically induced changes in TK, TCRP, and RK were analyzed and compared with those in spherical equivalent on the corneal plane (ΔSEco). Results: The study included 40 eyes (40 participants). After SMILE, the difference was smallest between TK [(0.08±0.38) D] and CHM values (P>0.05). However, TCRP, RK, KHaigis, KShammas, and KMaloney were significantly different from CHM data (P<0.05). The width of the 95% limits of agreement of TK (1.49 D) was narrowest, followed by that of RK (1.57 D). Pearson analysis showed that each parameter had a good correlation with CHM data. The differences between the changes in TK, TCRP and RK caused by surgery and ΔSEco were (0.03±0.39) D, (0.17±0.43) D, and (-0.19±0.46) D, respectively. The width of the 95% limits of agreement of ΔTK (1.54 D) was narrowest, and the correlation coefficient of ΔTK (0.951) was highest. Conclusion: The parameter TK of the IOLMaster 700 can provide accurate and objective corneal power evaluation after SMILE.

A Clinical Decision Tree to Support Keratoconus Patients Considering Corneal Cross-Linking Combined with Refractive Treatment.

BACKGROUND: To develop a fast and frugal decision tree to identify keratoconus patients most likely to benefit visually from the combination of corneal cross-linking (CXL) with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy ("CXL plus"). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The outcome of interest was an improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) by at least two lines at the 12-month follow-up. Preoperative and 12-month follow-up data from patients who received CXL plus (n = 96) and CXL only (n = 96) were used in a recursive partitioning approach to construct a frugal tree with three variables (corneal thickness [>/< 430 um], patient interest in CXL plus [yes/no], and tomographic cylinder [ 3 D]). In addition, we estimated the probability of the outcome from a multivariate logistic regression model for each combination of variables used in the decision tree. RESULTS: In the complete sample, 101/192 (52.6%) patients improved by at least two lines at the 12-month follow-up. Patients affirmative in all three answers had a 75.6% (34/45) probability of gaining at least two lines of improvement in UDVA by CXL plus. The statistical model estimated a 66.0% probability for a successful outcome. CONCLUSION: A fast and frugal tree consisting of three variables can be used to select a patient group with a high likelihood to benefit from CXL plus. The tree is useful in the preoperative counseling of keratoconus patients contemplating the CXL plus option, an intervention that is not fully covered by many health insurances.

Repeatability and agreement between a reference Scheimpflug tomographer and a low-cost Scheimpflug system.

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and agreement between Scheimpflug-based corneal topographers, Scansys and Pentacam, in measuring ocular parameters in myopic eyes. SETTING: Grade-A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The following measurements were performed in 204 subjects undergoing preoperative examinations for refractive surgery from the corneal curvature, astigmatism, corneal thickness, corneal volume, corneal asphericity, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and volume (ACV), and pupil diameters. Repeatability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% CI, Cronbach α, coefficient of variation, within-subject SD, test-retest repeatability, and 1-way analysis of variance (1-way analysis of variance). The interdevice agreement was determined using paired t test and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Scansys showed good repeatability in the anterior and posterior corneal flattest meridian (Kf), steepest meridian (Ks), and mean (Km); axis of anterior corneal Ks; anterior corneal astigmatism; pupil central corneal thickness (CCT); CCT; corneal apex thickness; thinnest corneal thickness; corneal volume; photopic pupil diameter; ACD; and ACV. In the agreement study, Bland-Altman plots showed that 95% limit of agreement of corneal curvature, pupil CCT, corneal apex thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, and corneal volume generated by Scansys and Pentacam were narrow. There were no statistically significant differences in the anterior corneal Kf and Km. CONCLUSIONS: Scansys showed good repeatability in measuring corneal curvature of anterior and posterior surfaces, anterior corneal astigmatism, corneal thickness, corneal volume, photopic pupil diameter, ACV, and ACD. Scansys and Pentacam can only be used interchangeably in measuring anterior corneal curvature.

Centration assessment of an extended depth of focus contact lens for myopic progression control.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and the inter and intra-observer reliability of the centration assessment of extended depth of focus (EDOF) contact lenses (CL) using corneal topography. METHOD: EDOF soft CLs (Mylo, Mark'Ennovy) were fitted on thirty-three myopic students (25 females), aged 19-28 years (22.7 ± 2.0 years). For any EDOF CL, a topography over the CL and a slit lamp (SL) digital picture were taken in random order. For the topographic images, the position of the EDOF CL centre, with respect to the pupil centre, was detected by two different practitioners (one newly graduated and one with more than 20 years of clinical experience respectively) and repeated after 15 days. This measurement was compared to the one taken through the SL, considered as the gold standard, and assessed using the instrument software. RESULTS: EDOF CLs resulted decentred inferiorly and temporally ranging, in the case of slit lamp assessment, between -0.27 ± 0.19 and 0.22 ± 0.23 mm horizontally and between -0.12 ± 0.31 and -0.17 ± 0.34 mm vertically, for the right and left eye respectively. The accuracy of the topographic assessment in determining EDOF CL centration was found to be very good compared to the SL assessment. No differences were found for the left eye, whereas in the right eye, a less temporally decentred position of the CL was detected by the topographical method (p < 0.05). However, this difference appeared clinically negligible (0.14 ± 0.22 mm). Inter-observer reliability (the differences between the two practitioners in assessing the EDOF centre) resulted significant only for the vertical coordinates of the centre position (p < 0.05). Concerning intra-observer reliability, better coefficient of precision and reliability between measurements within the same session were achieved by the more experienced practitioner, as well as a better level of the intraclass correlation coefficient in test-retest. CONCLUSION: The centration of the EDOF CL investigated in this study can be accurately detected by a corneal topography performed over CLs. Inter-observer reliability resulted good whereas the intra-observer reliability resulted partially affected by the level of clinical experience of the practitioner.

The ABCD grading system in assessment of corneal cross-linking effect in keratoconus with different cone locations.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the postoperative corneal cross-linking results of corneal parameters and the ABCD grading system, depending on the cone location. METHODS: Thirty eyes of 25 patients with keratoconus (KC), who received the corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment, were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were: patients under 18 years of age, corneal pachymetry less than 400 µm, corneal scarring, history of ocular trauma, history of ocular surgery, and corneal pathology other than KC. Patients were examined at the baseline visit, and followed-up at three, six, and twelve months after the CXL. All patients underwent visual acuity and Scheimpflug tomography at all visits. Progression parameters, keratometries, and ABCD grading were compared between the visits. Patients were classified into two groups: central and paracentral cones group (within the central 5 mm corneal zone) and peripheral cones group (outside the central 5 mm corneal zone), based on X-Y coordinates of maximal keratometry (Kmax). RESULTS: Parameter A remained relatively stable throughout the follow-up period in both groups. Parameter B and parameter C showed a significant increase in both groups postoperatively. Parameter D showed stability at the 6-month post-CXL visit in the peripheral KC group, while the central and paracentral KC group showed improvement at the 12-month post-CXL visit. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the postoperative response between different cone locations in the ABCD grading system, when classifying according to the Kmax, except an earlier recovery of the parameter D in peripherally located cones.

Socioeconomic Correlates of Keratoconus Severity and Progression.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the social determinants of health for keratoconus. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of patients with keratoconus, the electronic health record was reviewed for keratometry, treatments received, clinical comorbidities, and social characteristics. Outcomes included severe keratoconus at presentation (steep keratometry ≥52 diopters), disease progression (≥0.75 diopters increase from the first to the most recent clinical visit), and corneal transplantation. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with severity at presentation and corneal transplantation. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate progression. RESULTS: A total of 1038 patients with keratoconus were identified, 725 (70%) of whom had baseline imaging. Compared with commercially insured patients, Medicaid recipients were more likely to have severe keratoconus, independent of social and clinical confounders [odds ratio (OR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-3.35, P = 0.017]. Male sex was independently associated with progression (hazard ratio = 1.38, 95% CI, 1.03-1.84, P = 0.030). Medicare and Medicaid recipients were more likely to require transplantation compared with commercially insured patients (OR 2.71, 95% CI, 1.65-4.46, P < 0.001 and OR 1.74, 95% CI, 1.08-2.80, P = 0.022, respectively). Other social determinants of health, including non-White race/ethnicity, limited English proficiency, and unemployment, were associated with the outcomes only in univariate analysis. Obstructive sleep apnea, atopy, body mass index, and tobacco use were not associated with any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors were more consistent predictors of keratoconus severity and corneal transplantation compared with clinical factors that have received relatively greater attention in the keratoconus literature.

Assessment of the corneal biomechanical features of granular corneal dystrophy type 2 using dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the corneal biomechanical features of eyes with granular corneal dystrophy type 2 (GCD2) by analyzing corneal biomechanical indices obtained using a Corvis ST (CST) dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging device. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 CST parameters were compared in normal eyes (control) and eyes of patients with GCD2 treated at Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan. The parameters included the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), which is important in differentiating eyes with keratoconus from normal eyes. We measured the deposition rates of lesions in the central 7-mm region of the eye and assessed the correlation between the deposition rate and the CBI. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes with GCD2 and 23 control eyes were analyzed. Eyes with GCD2 showed significantly less corneal stiffness in 15 CST parameters than did control eyes. In particular, the CBI was remarkably higher in eyes with GCD2 than in control eyes (P = 0.000006). Additionally, the deposition rate and the CBI were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: GCD2 eyes had softer corneas than did control eyes in most biomechanical CST parameters, and one of the parameters (the CBI) was linked to the rate of deposited lesions. Since IOP may be underestimated in GCD2 eyes, management should be especially careful in GCD2 cases complicated by glaucoma.

Validation of the multi-metric D-index change in the assessment of keratoconus progression.

PURPOSE: To validate the effectiveness of the multi-metric D-index by Pentacam in detecting keratoconus (KC) progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of KC patients at the Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, during 2016-2018 with at least two corneal tomography examinations six months apart. Agreement between clinical diagnosis of progression (1.5D increase in mean keratometric value, 1D increase in Kmax, a 5% decrease in central corneal thickness (CCT), worsening of visual acuity by more than one line, or deterioration of manifest corneal astigmatism > 1.5D) and the D-index was evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to find the D-index's optimal cutoff value to show progression. RESULTS: We included KC eyes in the stable group (N = 7) and the progression group (N = 54). Patient demographics and tomographic parameters at baseline were similar between the groups. The D-index change was significantly higher in the progression group than in the stable group (median + 1 and 0.0, respectively, p = 0.024). Based on the ROC analysis, the optimal D-index cutoff change within at least six months was 0.32 (59.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.771, Youden = 0.592). Subjects with a D-index change above this value had a 21.1-fold increase in odds for corneal ectasia progression requiring CXL (OR: 21.1, 95%CI 1.17-398.8, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The multi-metric D-index can serve as a clinically feasible parameter to detect KC progression and guide patients' referral for further interventions.

Detection of subclinical keratoconus using a novel combined tomographic and biomechanical model based on an automated decision tree.

Early detection of keratoconus is a crucial factor in monitoring its progression and making the decision to perform refractive surgery. The aim of this study was to use the decision tree technique in the classification and prediction of subclinical keratoconus (SKC). A total of 194 eyes (including 105 normal eyes and 89 with SKC) were included in the double-center retrospective study. Data were separately used for training and validation databases. The baseline variables were derived from tomography and biomechanical imaging. The decision tree models were generated using Chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) and classification and regression tree (CART) algorithms based on the training database. The discriminating rules of the CART model selected metrics of the Belin/Ambrósio deviation (BAD-D), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SPA1), back eccentricity (Becc), and maximum pachymetric progression index in that order; On the other hand, the CHAID model selected BAD-D, deformation amplitude ratio, SPA1, and Becc. Further, the CART model allowed for discrimination between normal and SKC eyes with 92.2% accuracy, which was higher than that of the CHAID model (88.3%), BAD-D (82.0%), Corvis biomechanical index (CBI, 77.3%), and tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI, 78.1%). The discriminating performance of the CART model was validated with 92.4% accuracy, while the CHAID model was validated with 86.4% accuracy in the validation database. Thus, the CART model using tomography and biomechanical imaging was an excellent model for SKC screening and provided easy-to-understand discriminating rules.

Assessment of two-year clinical outcomes after keratoconus treatment using two different crosslinking protocols.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes of standard corneal collagen crosslinking with accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, comparative study included 79 eyes with progressive keratoconus, which were randomly assigned: 42 eyes received a standard CXL procedure, and 37 eyes were treated with the accelerated CXL protocol. We evaluated the following parameters, before the procedure and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), cylindrical values, corneal dioptric powers on the steepest meridian (Kmax), central corneal thickness (CCT); demarcation line depth (DLD) preoperatively and 1 month after the CXL procedure. RESULTS: The BCVA, MRSE, cylindrical values, Kmax, CCT improved significantly, after both the accelerated and the standard CXL procedure. Throughout the 24-months follow-up, BCVA improvement was achieved sooner in the accelerated group (after 1 month, vs. after 3 months). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in these aspects. The DLD-to-CCT was significantly greater in the standard group (66% vs. 62%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Standard and accelerated CXL are effective in stabilizing keratoconus progression in the long term. In clinical practice, the accelerated protocol has the added benefit of a faster visual recovery, in addition to the known reduced treatment time and increased comfort.