Validation of a Low-Cost Do-It-Yourself Model for Neonatal Thoracoscopic Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and validate a low cost, do-it-yourself model for neonatal thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). DESIGN: Volunteers with varying skills in neonatal minimally invasive surgery tested and evaluated the model simulating a neonatal thoracoscopic CDH repair. The model was built from ordinary materials purchased in a dime store: a small food container, a neoprene band simulating a diaphragm, an inflated balloon simulating a spleen, a tissue chord simulating intestine, and a body wash sponge simulating a collapsed lung. The evaluation comprised 3 sets of 5-point grading scale concerning appearance, necessary maneuvers, and ability to generate skills. Bowel reduction and suture efficacy was verified for each test. SETTING: Minimally invasive surgery simulation room at Pediatric Surgery Department of Hospital Universitario de Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer residents and specialists of pediatric surgery. RESULTS: Bowel reduction was possible in every test, with 1 spleen rupture, 1 bowel entrapment, and 2 inappropriate sutures due to tension. Most volunteers considered the general endoscopic vision (63.2%), external and internal dimensions (both 89.5%) to be highly similar; bowel reduction (68.4%) and diaphragm's manipulation and suture (57.9%) to be highly or very highly similar. Regarding its ability to generate skills, most considered it to be very or extremely useful concerning: camera handling (52.6%), working in small spaces and suture (both 100%), and tissue handling (63.2%). The least liked features were the colors and the diaphragm's tension. The size, portability, and the reproducibility were the most liked features. CONCLUSIONS: We consider this low cost and easily reproducible model to be realistic enough for CDH repair training, having the potential to be adapted for other simulations.

Interventional Pulmonology Fellowship Accreditation Standards: Executive Summary of the Multisociety Interventional Pulmonology Fellowship Accreditation Committee.

Interventional pulmonology (IP) is a rapidly evolving subspecialty of pulmonary medicine. In the last 10 years, formal IP fellowships have increased substantially in number from five to now > 30. The vast majority of IP fellowship trainees are selected through the National Resident Matching Program, and validated in-service and certification examinations for IP exist. Practice standards and training guidelines for IP fellowship programs have been published; however, considerable variability in the environment, curriculum, and experience offered by the various fellowship programs remains, and there is currently no formal accreditation process in place to standardize IP fellowship training. Recognizing the need for more uniform training across the various fellowship programs, a multisociety accreditation committee was formed with the intent to establish common accreditation standards for all IP fellowship programs in the United States. This article provides a summary of those standards and can serve as an accreditation template for training programs and their offices of graduate medical education as they move through the accreditation process.

Validation of an inanimate low cost model for training minimal invasive surgery (MIS) of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (AE/TEF) repair.

UNLABELLED: We present the results of the validation of an inanimate model created for training thoracoscopic treatment of esophageal atresia with lower tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used different domestic materials such as a piece of wood (support), corrugated plastic tubes (PVC) of different sizes to simulate ribs, intercostal spaces, trachea and spine and tubular latex balloons to simulate the esophagus and lungs to make the basic model. This device was inserted into the thoracic cavity of a rubber dummy simulating a 3kg newborn with a work area volume of 50ml. The model was designed taking into account the experience of doing this procedure in neonates. The cost of the materials used was 50 US$. Regular video endoscopic equipment and 3mm instruments were used. Thirty-nine international faculty or pediatric surgeons attending hands on courses with different levels of training in minimal invasive surgery (MIS) repair of EA/TEF performed the procedure in the model. We compared the performance of the practitioners with their experience in thoracoscopic repair of EA. A Likert-type scale was used to evaluate results. Previous experience in MIS, anatomical appearance of the model, surgical anatomy compared to a real patient, and utility as a training method were analyzed. We also used a checklist to assess performance. We evaluated: number of errors and types of injuries, quality of the anastomosis, and duration of procedure. To analyze the results we used a T-test, chi-square test and Excel® database to match up some results. RESULTS: Thirty-nine questionnaires were completed. Seven surgeons were experts (≥30 TEF/EA repairs as surgeon), 10 had intermediate level of experience (5 to 29 repairs as surgeon) and 22 were beginners (less than 5 repairs). To simplify the analysis we divided the respondents into low experience LE (<5 real procedures-beginners; n=22) and high experience HE (intermediate, 10; and experts, 7; n=17). In relation to the anatomical characteristics of the model, 94.48% (n=37) respondents considered that the model has a high degree of similarity or good similarity; in relation to surgical anatomy 88.2% (n=34) respondents considered that the model has a high degree of similarity or good similarity; 87.17% (n=34) respondents considered that the model can generate a good amount of skills and/or can generate great majority of skills to EA/TEF repair; and 12.82% (n=5) respondents consider that it can generate some skills or a few skills, only in relation to trocar placement, one of the surveyed items. The number of errors was 29±7 SD (20 to 51) for the low experience group (LE) and 9±6 SD (1 to 20) for the high experience group (HE) (P value<0.0001). Time in minutes was significantly lower in the HE group (40±9 SD; 26 to 58min), in relation with LE (81±19 SD; 49 to 118min) (P<0.0001, T-test). Deficient or incomplete anastomosis also showed differences: 7 (32%) in the LE group and 1 (6%) in the HE group (P = 0.04, chi-square test). We saw a correlation between the previous experience of the surgeon and their performance in the model considering operating time, quality of anastomosis and peripheral tissue damage. According to the suggestions registered in the questionnaires, we have now improved the model. We have also started using it in a scenario to simulate the whole neonatal MIS operative room setting and team work.

Quantitative pediatric surgical skill assessment using a rapid-prototyped chest model.

INTRODUCTION: Though minimally invasive pediatric surgery has become more widespread, pediatric-specific surgical skills have not been quantitatively assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As a first step toward the quantification of pediatric-specific surgical skills, a pediatric chest model comprising a three-dimensional rapid-prototyped pediatric ribcage with accurate anatomical dimensions, a suturing skin model with force-sensing capability, and forceps with motion-tracking sensors were developed. A skill assessment experiment was conducted by recruiting 16 inexperienced pediatric surgeons and 14 experienced pediatric surgeons to perform an endoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying task in both the pediatric chest model setup and the conventional box trainer setup. RESULTS: The instrument motion measurement was successful in only 20 surgeons due to sensor failure. The task completion time, total path length of instruments, and applied force were compared between the inexperienced and experienced surgeons as well as between the box trainer and chest model setups. The experienced surgeons demonstrated better performance in all parameters for both setups, and the pediatric chest model was more challenging due to the pediatric features replicated by the model. CONCLUSION: The pediatric chest model was valid for pediatric skill assessment, and further analysis of the collected data will be conducted to further investigate pediatric-specific skills.

Evaluation of Three Sources of Validity Evidence for a Synthetic Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair Simulator.

PURPOSE: Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia (EA)/tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) repair is technically challenging. We have previously reported our experiences with a high-fidelity hybrid model for simulation-based educational instruction in thoracoscopic EA/TEF, including the high cost of the tissue for these models. The purposes of this study were (1) to create a low-cost synthetic tissue EA/TEF repair simulation model and (2) to evaluate the content validity of the synthetic tissue simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of the literature and computed tomography images were used to create computer-aided drawings (CAD) for a synthetic, size-appropriate EA/TEF tissue insert. The inverse of the CAD image was then printed in six different sections to create a mold that could be filled with platinum-cured silicone. The silicone EA/TEF insert was then placed in a previously described neonatal thorax and covered with synthetic skin. Following institutional review board-exempt determination, 47 participants performed some or all of a simulated thoracoscopic EA/TEF during two separate international meetings (International Pediatric Endosurgery Group [IPEG] and World Federation of Associations of Pediatric Surgeons [WOFAPS]). Participants were identified as "experts," having 6-50 self-reported thoracoscopic EA/TEF repairs, and "novice," having 0-5 self-reported thoracoscopic EA/TEF repairs. Participants completed a self-report, six-domain, 24-item instrument consisting of 23 5-point rating scales and one 4-point Global Rating Scale. Validity evidence relevant to test content and response processes was evaluated using the many-facet Rasch model, and evidence of internal structure (interitem consistency) was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: A review of the participants' ratings indicates there were no overall differences across sites (IPEG versus WOFAPS, P=.84) or experience (expert versus novice, P=.17). The highest observed averages were 4.4 (Value of Simulator as a Training Tool), 4.3 (Physical Attributes-chest circumference, chest depth, and intercostal space), and 4.3 (Realism of Experience-fistula location). The lowest observed averages were 3.5 (Ability to Perform-closure of fistula), 3.7 (Ability to Perform-acquisition target trocar sites), 3.8 (Physical Attributes-landmark visualization), 3.8 (Ability to Perform-anastomosis and dissection of upper pouch), and 3.9 (Realism of Materials-skin). The Global Rating Scale was 2.9, coinciding with a response of "this simulator can be considered for use in neonatal TEF repair training, but could be improved slightly." Material costs for the synthetic EA/TEF inserts were less than $2 U.S. per insert. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully created a low-cost synthetic EA/TEF tissue insert for use in a neonatal thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair simulator. Analysis of the participants' ratings of the synthetic EA/TEF simulation model indicates that it has value and can be used to train pediatric surgeons, especially those early in their learning curve, to begin to perform a thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair. Areas for model improvement were identified, and these areas will be the focus for future modifications to the synthetic EA/TEF repair simulator.

Video-based skill assessment of endoscopic suturing in a pediatric chest model and a box trainer.

PURPOSE: Pediatric endoscopic surgery requires special surgical skills because of the small working space and tissue fragility. This article presents a video-based skill assessment method for endoscopic suturing using a pediatric chest model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A commercial suture pad was placed in a rapid-prototyped pediatric chest model of a 1-year-old patient to simulate the thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia type C. Twenty-eight pediatric surgeons (9 experts, 9 intermediates, and 10 trainees) performed an endoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying task both in the pediatric chest model and in a box trainer. The tasks were video-recorded and rated by two blinded observers using the 29-point checklist method and a suturing errors score sheet method. The task completion time and the number of needle manipulations were measured. RESULTS: The expert group showed better performance than the intermediate and trainee groups in the pediatric chest model, and the differences were larger than those in the box trainer. Significant differences between the expert and the trainee groups were observed in the items related to safety such as the skills for keeping the needle in view at all times. Significant differences between the expert and intermediate groups were observed in the items related to task quality and efficiency such as the smoothness of knot tying and the number of needle manipulations. CONCLUSIONS: Video-based skill assessment of endoscopic suturing using the pediatric chest model and a box trainer distinguished pediatric endoscopic surgeons according to their clinical experience, and pediatric-specific skills were identified.

Safety and accuracy of semirigid pleuroscopy performed by pulmonary fellows at a major university hospital: our initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Pleuroscopy is considered a safe procedure with a high diagnostic accuracy but this record is based on studies published by pulmonologists experienced in performing the procedure. METHODS: Review of 40 consecutive patients who underwent semirigid pleuroscopy by a pulmonary fellow under the supervision of a pulmonologist. RESULTS: Pleuroscopy was performed for diagnosis of pleural effusion (n=33), or treatment of pleural effusion (n=4) or pneumothorax (n=3). The mean age±SD of the patients was 58.23±12.98 years and 23 patients were male. Pleuroscopy was performed with a flex-rigid pleuroscope under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. An ultrasound was used to choose the entry site. The dose of midazolam and fentanyl used was 6.45±2.87 mg and 173.39±77.17 mcg, respectively. The duration of the procedure was 69.3±25.3 minutes. The amount of pleural fluid removed was 1.5±0.94 L. The overall diagnostic accuracy of pleuroscopy was 87.8%, and the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value for malignancy was 93.9%, 100%, 92.3% and 100%, respectively. There were a few complications: desaturation (n=2), hypotension (n=5), extensive subcutaneous emphysema (n=3), and persistent air leak (n=1). There was no case of significant bleeding or death from the procedure. Six of the 7 cardiopulmonary complications occurred during the first 4 procedures performed by the fellows. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of pleuroscopy remains high in the hands of pulmonary fellows. However, the procedure can be associated with a slightly higher rate of complications when performed by fellows in training, especially in the early part of their learning curve. Most of the few complications observed were not caused by the procedure per se and resulted from over-zealous use of medications for conscious sedation.

Needs assessment for an errors-based curriculum on thoracoscopic lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests a benefit from a skills curriculum emphasizing error prevention, identification, and management. Our purpose was to identify common errors committed by trainees during simulated thoracoscopic lobectomy for use in developing an error-based curriculum. METHODS: Twenty-one residents (postgraduate years 1 to 8) performed a thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy on a previously validated simulator. Videos of the procedure were reviewed in a blinded fashion using a checklist listing 66 possible cognitive and technical errors. RESULTS: Of the 21 residents, 15 (71%) self-reported completing the anatomic lobectomy; however, only 7 (33%) had actually divided all of the necessary structures correctly. While dissecting the superior pulmonary vein, 16 residents (76%) made at least one error. The most common (n=13, 62%) was dissecting individual branches rather than the entire vein. On the bronchus, 14 (67%) made at least one error. Again, the most common (n=9, 43%) was dissecting branches. During these tasks, cognitive errors were more common than technical errors. While dissecting arterial branches, 18 residents (86%) made at least one error. Technical and cognitive errors occurred with equal frequency during arterial dissection. The most common arterial error was excess tension on the vessel (n=10, 48%). CONCLUSIONS: Curriculum developers should identify skill-specific technical and judgment errors to verify the scope of errors typically committed. For a thoracoscopic lobectomy curriculum, emphasis should be placed on correct identification of anatomic landmarks during dissection of the vein and airway and on proper tissue handling technique during arterial dissection.