Accurate costs of blood transfusion: a microcosting of administering blood products in the United Kingdom National Health Service.

BACKGROUND: In an environment of limited health care resources, it is crucial for health care systems which provide blood transfusion to have accurate and comprehensive information on the costs of transfusion, incorporating not only the costs of blood products, but also their administration. Unfortunately, in many countries accurate costs for administering blood are not available. Our study aimed to generate comprehensive estimates of the costs of administering transfusions for the UK National Health Service. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A detailed microcosting study was used to cost two key inputs into transfusion: transfusion laboratory and nursing inputs. For each input, data collection forms were developed to capture staff time, equipment, and consumables associated with each step in the transfusion process. Costing results were combined with costs of blood product wastage to calculate the cost per unit transfused, separately for different blood products. Data were collected in 2014/15 British pounds and converted to US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 438 data collection forms were completed by 74 staff. The cost of administering blood was $71 (£49) per unit for red blood cells, $84 (£58) for platelets, $55 (£38) for fresh-frozen plasma, and $72 (£49) for cryoprecipitate. CONCLUSIONS: Blood administration costs add substantially to the costs of the blood products themselves. These are frequently incurred costs; applying estimates to the blood components supplied to UK hospitals in 2015, the annual cost of blood administration, excluding blood products, exceeds $175 (£120) million. These results provide more accurate estimates of the total costs of transfusion than those previously available.

Exploring the assessors' and nurses' experience of formal assessment of clinical competency in the administration of blood components.

Blood transfusion, clinical competency, assessment, evaluation The change in nurse education from apprenticeship training to the higher education setting, has raised concerns about the lack of practical skills newly qualified nurses have on registration. Every practitioner must be able to administer blood components safely however, the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme have consistently demonstrated that 'wrong blood' incidents are the major cause of morbidity and mortality related to transfusion in the United Kingdom. As a result the SHOT working group have recommended that all practitioners should have their clinical competency formally assessed. This paper describes the development and evaluation of a tool for assessing clinical competency for staff involved in transfusing blood. The evaluation used a triangulated approach of phenomenology and survey. The tool was piloted in two different clinical settings by four registered nurses who each assessed two nurses. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted to collate the nurses' and the assessors' experience of the process. The study participants were of the opinion that assessing clinical competency using a criterion-referenced tool gave practitioners the opportunity to relate theory to practice, promote best practice and encourage adherence to hospital transfusion policies. Formal assessment of clinical competency is therefore, a vehicle that could be used to promote safe transfusion practice, ensuring the safety of patients is paramount.

Thromboelastography: a means to transfusion reduction.

Consider using thromboelastography to improve care outcomes for cardiac surgery patients.