Total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation: a 10-year update on outcomes and assessment of long-term durability.

BACKGROUND: Total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation (TPIAT) offers an effective, lasting solution for the management of chronic pancreatitis up to 5-years post-operatively. Our aim was to assess durability of TPIAT at 10-years. METHODS: Patients undergoing TPIAT for chronic pancreatitis eligible for 10-year follow-up were included. Primary outcomes, including endocrine function and narcotic requirements, were reported at 5-, 7.5-, and 10-years post-operatively. RESULTS: Of the 231 patients who underwent TPIAT, 142 met inclusion criteria. All patients underwent successful TPIAT with an average of 5680.3 islet equivalents per body weight. While insulin independence tended to decrease over time (25.7% vs. 16.0% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.11) with an increase in HbA1C (7.6% vs. 8.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.09), partial islet function persisted (64.9% vs. 68.0% vs. 67.4%, p = 0.93). Opioid independence was achieved and remained durable in the majority (73.3% vs. 72.2% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.93). Quality of life improvements persisted, with 85% reporting improvement from baseline at 10-years. Estimated median overall survival was 202.7 months. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the largest series reporting on long-term outcomes after TPIAT, demonstrating excellent long-term pain control and durable improvements in quality of life. Islet cell function declines over time however stable glycemic control is maintained.

Assessment of plasma microvesicles to monitor pancreatic islet graft dysfunction: Beta cell- and leukocyte-derived microvesicles as specific features in a pilot longitudinal study.

Markers of early pancreatic islet graft dysfunction and its causes are lacking. We monitored 19 type 1 diabetes islet-transplanted patients for up to 36 months following last islet injection. Patients were categorized as Partial (PS) or complete (S) Success, or Graft Failure (F), using the ß-score as an indicator of graft function. F was the subset reference of maximum worsened graft outcome. To identify the immune, pancreatic, and liver contribution to the graft dysfunction, the cell origin and concentration of circulating microvesicles (MVs) were assessed, including MVs from insulin-secreting ß-cells typified by polysialic acid of neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM), and data were compared with values of the ß-score. Similar ranges of PSA-NCAM+ -MVs were found in healthy volunteers and S patients, indicating minimal cell damage. In PS, a 2-fold elevation in PSA-NCAM+ -MVs preceded each ß-score drop along with a concomitant rise in insulin needs, suggesting ß-cell damage or altered function. Significant elevation of liver asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR)+ -MVs, endothelial CD105+ -MVs, neutrophil CD66b+ -MVs, monocyte CD 14+ -MVs, and T4 lymphocyte CD4+ -MVs occurred before each ß-score drop, CD8+ -MVs increased only in F, and B lymphocyte CD19+ -MVs remained undetectable. In conclusion, PSA-NCAM+ -MVs are noninvasive early markers of transplant dysfunction, while ASGPR+ -MVs signal host tissue remodeling. Leukocyte MVs could identify the cause of graft dysfunction.

Clinical implementation of islet transplantation: A current assessment.

Beta-cell replacement is the only physiologically relevant alternative to insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Pancreas and islet transplantation from deceased organ donors can provide a new beta-cell pool to produce insulin, help blood glucose management, and delay secondary diabetes complications. For children and adolescents with T1D, whole pancreas transplantation is not a viable option because of surgical complications, whereas islet transplantation, even if it is procedurally simpler, must still overcome the burden of immunosuppression to become a routine therapy for children in the future.

Assessment of the relationship between hypoglycaemia awareness and autonomic function following islet cell/pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the autonomic function of patients who have regained awareness of hypoglycaemia following islet cell or whole pancreas transplant. METHODS: Five patients with type 1 diabetes and either islet cell (four patients) or whole pancreas (one patient) transplant were assessed. These patients were age-matched and gender-matched to five patients with type 1 diabetes without transplant and preserved hypoglycaemia awareness and five healthy control participants without diabetes. All participants underwent (i) a battery of five cardiovascular autonomic function tests, (ii) quantitative sudomotor axonal reflex testing, and (iii) sympathetic skin response testing. RESULTS: Total recorded hypoglycaemia episodes per month fell from 76 pre-transplant to 13 at 0- to 3-month post-transplant (83% reduction). The percentage of hypoglycaemia episodes that patients were unaware of decreased from 97 to 69% at 0-3 months (p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test) and to 20% after 12 months (p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). This amelioration was maintained at the time of testing (mean time: 4.1 years later, range: 2-6 years). Presence of significant autonomic neuropathy was seen in all five transplanted patients (at least 2/3 above modalities abnormal) but in only one of the patients with diabetes without transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term maintenance of hypoglycaemia awareness that returns after islet cell/pancreas transplantation in patients with diabetes is not prevented by significant autonomic neuropathy and is better accounted for by other factors such as reversal of hypoglycaemia-associated autonomic failure.

Human islet cell isolation: the initial step in an islet transplanting program in Shiraz, Southern Iran.

OBJECTIVES: Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an emerging epidemic worldwide and results from autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing ß cells. Islet transplanting is a potential treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Shiraz Organ Transplant Center is a leading center for organ transplants, especially pancreatic transplants, in Iran. For this reason, we want to establish an islet transplanting program. Here, we briefly describe our experience with islet isolation on 6 pancreata from deceased donors. We discussed the necessary equipment required for this procedure, as well as the professionals needed and a specially planned facility. RESULTS: Islet yield was ≤ 100 000 (islet equivalent), viability 40% to 45%, and the purity was 30% to 45%. We do not have a refrigerated COBE processor for purification; therefore, the yield was low. Our experience shows that we should improve things, so as to acquire more islets for developing clinical grade cell therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, isolation costs are high, and accessing a safer, more economic, and persistent source of material and reagents will improve this technique.

Patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness following total pancreatectomy with islet cell transplantation for chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) results in an extremely poor quality of life and substantially increases health care utilization. Few data exist regarding the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for CP. METHODS: This article examined the cost-effectiveness of total pancreatectomy (TP) with islet cell autotransplantation (IAT) for CP. RESULTS: Sixty patients undergoing TP + IAT and 37 patients undergoing TP were identified. Surgery resulted in significant reduction in opiate use, frequency of hospital admissions, and length of stay as well as visual analog scale scores for pain. Total pancreatectomy + IAT resulted in longer survival than TP alone (16.6 vs 12.9 years); 21.6% of patients with TP + IAT were insulin-independent, and those requiring insulin have reduced daily requirements compared with those having TP alone (22 vs 35 IU). The cost of TP + IAT with attendant admission and analgesia costs over the 16-year survival period was £110,445 compared with £101,608 estimated 16-year costs if no TP + IAT was undertaken. CONCLUSIONS: Total pancreatectomy + IAT is effective in improving pain and reducing analgesia. Islet cell transplantation offers the chance of insulin independence and results in lower insulin requirements, as well as conferring a survival advantage when compared with TP alone. Total pancreatectomy + IAT is cost-neutral when compared with nonsurgical or segmental surgical therapy.

Donor pancreata: evolving approaches to organ allocation for whole pancreas versus islet transplantation.

As islet transplantation increasingly enters the clinical arena, its coexistence with vascularized pancreas transplantation makes it necessary to reassess the questions of donor selection and allocation. In answering these questions, one must put in the balance the short-term morbidity of pancreas transplantation with the long-term attrition of islet grafts. The preferential allocation of pancreases from obese and older donors for islet isolation has been based on their association with worse pancreas transplant outcomes and better islet isolation results in islet yields. In this overview, we show that transplanted islet mass does not necessarily correlate with graft function and make the case that donor selection criteria for islet transplantation, and hence allocation rules, may need to be redefined.

Histologic graft assessment after clinical islet transplantation.

BACKGROUND: An accurate monitoring would help understanding the fate of islet grafts after transplantation. METHODS: This work assessed the feasibility of needle biopsy monitoring after intraportal islet transplantation (n=16), and islet graft morphology was studied with the addition of autopsy samples (n=2). Pancreas autopsy samples from two nondiabetic individuals were used as control. RESULTS: Islet tissue was found in five needle samples (31%). Sampling success was related to size (100% sampling for the four biopsies of 1.8 cm in length or higher, P

Regulatory issues in xenotransplantation: recent developments.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews recent literature on regulatory issues of xenotransplantation, focusing primarily on current progress with transplantation of pancreatic islets for diabetic patients. The need for a global system that connects the national and international regulatory levels within a coherent framework is emphasized. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent progress in preclinical xenotransplantation of pancreatic islets has enhanced the hopes of providing patients with safe and effective treatments from animal cells and tissues in the near future. At the same time the increasing number of clinical trials proposed and sometimes authorized calls for attention from regulatory authorities. SUMMARY: Although the main regulatory aspects of xenotransplantation have been identified since the early 1990s, regulatory problems connected to the promising scientific data published in the field of pancreatic islets still require attention. In fact most normative issues, such as criteria for patients' enrollment in clinical trials and the management of safety measures have been primarily explored in relation to solid organ transplantation. Also the issue of animal rights has become more compelling in relation to the treatment of nonhuman primates in preclinical trials. In these rapidly evolving conditions the establishment of agreed guidelines at both the national and international levels remains the most urgent goal to be achieved.

MRI assessment of ischemic liver after intraportal islet transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is a recent focus on embolization of the portal vein by transplanted islets as a major cause of early graft loss. The resultant ischemia causes necrosis or apoptosis of cells within the liver. Thus, noninvasive assessment of the liver receiving the islet transplant is important to evaluate the status islet grafts. METHODS: This study used noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of the posttransplant ischemic liver. Syngeneic islets in streprozotocin-induced diabetic mice were used. MRI and morphological liver assessments were performed at 0, 2, and 28 days after transplantation. Histologic assessment of insulin, hypoxia induced factor 1-alpha, and apoptosis were undertaken at similar time points. RESULTS: Ischemic/necrotic regions in the liver were detected by MRI at 2 days but not at 28 days after transplantation and were confirmed histologically. Liver injury was quantified from high intensity areas on T2-weighted images. Insulin release peaked 2 days after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Onset and reversal of liver ischemia due to intraportal islet transplantation are detectable using T2-weighted MRI. These changes coincide with periods of maximum insulin release likely due to partial islet destruction. We propose that MRI, as a noninvasive monitor of graft-related ischemia, may be useful in assessment of liver and islet engraftment after intraportal islet transplantation in a clinical setting.

Sequential kidney/islet transplantation: efficacy and safety assessment of a steroid-free immunosuppression protocol.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of the Edmonton immunosuppression protocol in recipients of islet-after-kidney (IAK) grafts. Fifteen islet infusions were administered to 8 patients with type 1 diabetes and a functioning kidney graft. Immunosuppression was switched on the day of transplantation to a regimen associating sirolimus-tacrolimus-daclizumab. Insulin-independence was achieved in all patients for at least 3 months, with an actual rate of 71% at 1 year after transplantation (5 of 7 patients). After 24-month mean follow-up, five have ongoing insulin independence, 11-34 months after transplantation, with normal HbA1c, fructosamine and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) values. Results of arginine-stimulation tests improved over time, mostly after the second islet infusion. Severe adverse events included bleeding after percutaneous portal access (n=2), severe pneumonia attributed to sirolimus toxicity (n=1), kidney graft loss after immunosuppression discontinuation (n=1), reversible humoral kidney rejection (n=1) and fever of unknown origin (n=1). These data indicate that the Edmonton approach can be successfully applied to the IAK setting. This procedure is associated with significant side effects and only patients with stable function of the kidney graft should be considered. The net harm versus benefit has not yet been established and will require further studies with larger numbers of enrolled subjects.

Transplantation for type I diabetes: comparison of vascularized whole-organ pancreas with isolated pancreatic islets.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy, risks, and costs of whole-organ pancreas transplantation (WOP) with the costs of isolated islet transplantation (IIT) in the treatment of patients with type I diabetes mellitus. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A striking improvement has taken place in the results of IIT with regard to attaining normoglycemia and insulin independence of type I diabetic recipients. Theoretically, this minimally invasive therapy should replace WOP because its risks and expense should be less. To date, however, no systematic comparisons of these 2 options have been reported. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of WOP and IIT performed at the University of Pennsylvania between September 2001 and February 2004. We compared a variety of parameters, including patient and graft survival, degree and duration of glucose homeostasis, procedural and immunosuppressive complications, and resources utilization. RESULTS: Both WOP and IIT proved highly successful at establishing insulin independence in type I diabetic patients. Whole-organ pancreas recipients experienced longer lengths of stay, more readmissions, and more complications, but they exhibited a more durable state of normoglycemia with greater insulin reserves. Achieving insulin independence by IIT proved surprisingly more expensive, despite shorter initial hospital and readmission stays. CONCLUSION: Despite recent improvement in the success of IIT, WOP provides a more reliable and durable restoration of normoglycemia. Although IIT was associated with less procedure-related morbidity and shorter hospital stays, we unexpectedly found IIT to be more costly than WOP. This was largely due to IIT requiring islets from multiple donors to gain insulin independence. Because donor pancreata that are unsuitable for WOP can often be used successfully for IIT, we suggest that as IIT evolves, it should continue to be evaluated as a complementary alternative to rather than as a replacement for the better-established method of WOP.

Cost analysis of human islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in the Swiss-French Consortium GRAGIL.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost of islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients with a functional renal graft in a multicenter network. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study involved nine diabetic patients transplanted in the Swiss-French Groupe Rhône-Alpes, Rhin et Geneve pour la transplantation d'Ilots Langerhans (GRAGIL) consortium between March 1999 and June 2000. The direct medical costs were estimated from Social Security's perspective from the inclusion of the patient to 1 year after transplantation. All cost components were computed separately and included evaluation, screening and candidacy, organ retrieval, islet processing, pancreas and islet transportation, hospitalization for transplantation, follow-up, medications (immunosuppressive, antidiabetic, and adjuvant drugs), and adverse events requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: During the study period, 56 pancreata were processed and 14 islet preparations were transplanted. The average cost of an islet transplantation (procedure and 1-year follow-up) was 77,745 euro (French rate, year 2000). The four main cost components were islet preparation (30% of the total cost), adverse events (24%), drugs (14%), and hospitalization (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall costs of islet transplantation are slightly higher than those of pancreas transplantation. The cell isolation process is a critical point; a reduction in overall cost will require more efficient ways of isolating high yields of viable islets. Costs generated by shipments within the GRAGIL network did not represent an economic burden. It can be expected that the costs will decrease with growing experience and improving technology.