Mitigation of in-hospital risk of coronavirus disease 2019: Experience from a haematology-oncology and stem cell transplant setting.

Background: . Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) was first described in December 2019 and has evolved into an ongoing global pandemic. Cancer patients on chemotherapy are immunocompromised and are at the highest risk of Covid-19-related complications. We describe our experience with the management of haematology-oncology and stem cell transplant (SCT) patients receiving curative chemotherapy in a hospital with a high influx of Covid-19 patients. Methods: . We did a prospective observational study at a 99-bedded cancer centre of a tertiary care teaching hospital from April 2020 to September 2020. Preventive measures taken were categorized as follows: (i) staff: screening, mandatory use of personal protective equipment (PPE), risk stratification of potential exposure and testing and isolation as needed; (ii) patients: mandatory viral polymerase chain reaction testing, segregation of positive and untested patients and testing of family members; and (iii) environment: mandatory regular cleaning, visitor restriction, telemedicine services and reassignment of priority to clinic visits. Treatment of the underlying conditions was continued with added precautions. Results: . A total of 54 patients were included in the analysis, including 48 with haematological malignancies and 6 for stem cell therapy. Preventive measures were universally applied, and chemotherapy with a curative intent was initiated as per protocol. Three patients were detected to have Covid-19 infection before admission and one after the institution of chemotherapy. Nine patients died after the first cycle of chemotherapy, 2 due to severe Covid-19-related illness and 7 due to complications of chemotherapy or disease progression. Conclusions: . In the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, treatment for haematological malignancies must continue while balancing the risk of Covid-19 infections. Our report emphasizes the effectiveness of measures such as hand hygiene, social isolation, patient segregation, use of masks and PPE and universal pre-treatment testing for Covid-19 in reducing the risk of infection in a high-risk clinical setting.

Economic burden in treated Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Aim: To understand the economic burden of relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients in Japan treated with salvage chemotherapy. Patients & methods: Patients who received systemic therapy after first-line treatment were analyzed to assess its associated cost and resource use using a retrospective claims database. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed separately. Results & conclusion: This study identified 2927 and 1085 patients in the second- (2L) and third-line (3L) cohorts. The median ages for the 2L and 3L cohorts were 71 and 70 years, respectively, with Charlson Comorbidity Score of 3. A majority of the patients had limited stem cell transplant due to advanced age. Median lengths of inpatient stay for the 2L and 3L cohorts were 118 and 116 days, respectively. The majority of costs were attributed to inpatient costs, and limited COVID-19 impact was observed in this study.

Assessment of early renal angina index for prediction of subsequent severe acute kidney injury during septic shock in children.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is independently related to the adverse outcome of septic shock, but it lacks effective early predictors. Renal anginal index (RAI) was used to predict subsequent severe AKI (AKIs) in critically ill patients. The application of RAI in children with septic shock has not been reported. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of early RAI in predicting subsequent AKIs within 3 days after PICU admission in children with septic shock by comparing with early fluid overload (FO) and early creatinine elevation. METHODS: Sixty-six children admitted to PICU aged 1 month to 16 years old, with septic shock from January 2016 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, AKIs was defined by the KDIGO stage ≥2 within 3 days after PICU admission. Early RAI positive (RAI+) was defined as RAI ≥ 8 within 12 h of PICU admission. Any elevation of serum creatinine (SCr) over baseline within 12 h after PICU admission was denoted as "Early SCr > base". Early FO positive (FO+) was defined as FO > 10% within 24 h of PICU admission. RESULTS: Of 66 eligible cases, the ratio of early RAI+, early SCr > base, early FO+ was 57.57, 59.09 and 16.67% respectively. The incidence of AKIs in early RAI+ group (78.94%) was higher than that in early RAI- group (21.42%) (p = 0.04), and there was no significant difference compared with the early FO+ group (71.79%) and early SCr > base group (81.82%) (P > 0.05). After adjustment for confounders, early RAI+ was independently associated with the occurrence of AKIs within 3 days (OR 10.04, 95%CI 2.39-42.21, p < 0.01). The value of early RAI+ (AUC = 0.78) to identify patients at high risk of AKIs was superior to that of early SCr > base (AUC = 0.70) and early FO+ (AUC = 0.58). A combination of serum lactate with early RAI+ improved the predictive performance for assessing AKIs (AUC = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Early RAI could be used as a more convenient and effective index to predict the risk of AKIs in children with septic shock within 3 days. Early RAI+ combined with serum lactate improved the predictive performance for assessing AKIs.

Health-related quality of life in Croatian general population and multiple myeloma patients assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 questionnaires.

Background The impact of disease and treatment on the patient's overall well-being and functioning is a topic of growing interest in clinical research and practice. The aim of this study is to obtain reference data on quality of life of Croatian general population. Further, we aim to assess the impact of the disease and its primary systemic treatment on their health related quality of life (HrQoL) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients and methods Participants for the first part of the study were randomly selected from adult Croatian population. In the clinical part of the study MM patients were included as prospectively diagnosed within two years in two major Croatian haematological centres. The EORTC QLQ-C30 in both trials and QLQ-MY20 in MM patients only were applied for HrQoL assessment. Results Gender, age and place of residence have great impact on quality of life scores in Croatian population. The MM patients at the time of diagnosis have lower QLQ-C30 scores for global quality of life, functional and symptom scale scores, as well as single items. The type of disease followed by the choice of therapy options are important HrQoL determinants. Conclusions The norm values available now for Croatian population will help to interpret HrQoL for clinicians and aid in planning cancer care interventions. This study identified treatment effect consistent with those from other observational studies and provided new data on HrQoL across two different treatment choices for MM patients.

Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and cost burden of multiple myeloma in Portugal.

OBJECTIVE: We provide a real-world overview of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment patterns, outcomes and healthcare resource use (HRU) in Portugal. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from consecutive patients diagnosed/treated at the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto) between 2012 and 2015. Primary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with treatment patterns and HRU secondary. Analysis was by line of therapy (LOT), and post hoc by age (<65/≥65 years). RESULTS: 165, 73 and 32 patients received first, second and third LOTs respectively (N = 187). OS probabilities were 91.5%, 83.2% (<65 years) and 86.6%, 65.3% (≥65 years) at 12, 24 months respectively. PFS decreased from the start of each LOT for both age groups and was less for patients ≥65 years. Younger patients received more combination treatment (immunomodulatory drugs + proteasome inhibitors) and stem cell transplants, and had higher mean costs than older patients (€81,213 vs. €36,864 where three LOTs were received). Cost drivers were medications, transplantations and hospitalisations. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest divergence between younger and older MM patients. Older patients had lower OS and PFS probabilities, HRU costs and fewer stem cell transplantations. The treatment patterns in each LOT may differ from other countries' findings, suggesting treatment heterogeneity.

The politics of evidence in online illness narratives: An analysis of crowdfunding for purported stem cell treatments.

This article addresses the growing trend of crowdfunding for unproven stem cell-based treatments. Our analysis uses quantitative and qualitative data collected from two popular fundraising sites to examine how these sites are used to fund purported stem cell 'treatments' or 'therapies'. In addition to mapping the use and success of these online campaigns by people with different health conditions in different locations, we consider the breakthrough restitution story as a key narrative that campaign organisers use to solicit donations. We argue that crowdfunding is a rapidly growing digital space where 'truths' about experimental treatments are constituted and a politics of evidence is unfolding. These developments are to the potential financial benefit of crowdfunding platforms and businesses offering unproven stem cell-based interventions, and to the potential detriment of patients and their supporters.

The Stem-Cell Market for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Patient Perspective.

The use of stem-cell therapies for the treatment of various musculoskeletal conditions, especially knee osteoarthritis (OA), is rapidly expanding, despite only low-level evidence to support its use. Centers offering these therapies are often marketing and charging patients out-of-pocket costs for such services. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the current marketed: (1) prices and (2) clinical efficacy of stem-cell therapies for knee OA. This was a prospective cross-sectional study which queried 317 U.S. centers that offered direct-to-consumer stem-cell therapies for musculoskeletal conditions. A total of 273 of 317 centers were successfully contacted via phone or e-mail, using a simulated 57-year-old male patient with knee OA. Scripted questions were asked by the simulated patient to determine the marketed prices and clinical efficacy. Centers generally reported the proportion of patients who had "good results" or "symptomatic improvement." The mean price of a unilateral (same-day) stem-cell knee injection was $5,156 with a standard deviation of $2,446 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $4,550-5,762, n = 65). The mean proportion of claimed clinical efficacy was 82% with a standard deviation of 9.6% (95% CI: 79.0-85.5%, n = 36). Most American stem-cell centers offer therapies for knee OA. The cost of these therapies averages about $5,000 per injection, and centers claim that 80% of the patients had "good results" or "symptomatic improvement," denoting a gap between what is documented in the published literature and the marketing claims. These findings offer both patients and physicians insight into the current stem-cell market for knee OA. We hope that with this information, providers can more optimally make patients aware of discrepancies between what is being marketed versus the current evidence-based landscape of these therapies for knee OA.

Racial disparity in utilization of therapeutic modalities among multiple myeloma patients: a SEER-medicare analysis.

Outcomes have improved considerably in multiple myeloma (MM), but disparities among racial-ethnic groups exist. Differences in utilization of novel therapeutics are likely contributing factors. We explored such differences from the SEER-Medicare database. A utilization analysis of lenalidomide, thalidomide, bortezomib, and stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed for patients diagnosed with MM between 2007 and 2009, including use over time, use by race, time-dependent trends for each racial subgroup, and survival analysis. A total of 5338 MM patients were included with median 2.4-year follow-up. Within the first year of MM diagnosis, utilization of lenalidomide, bortezomib, SCT, and more than one novel agent increased over time while utilization of thalidomide decreased. There was significantly lower utilization of lenalidomide among African-Americans (P < 0.01), higher thalidomide use among Hispanics and Asians (P < 0.01), and lower bortezomib use among Asians (P < 0.01). Hispanics had the highest median number of days to first dose of bortezomib (P = 0.02) and the lowest utilization of SCT (P < 0.01). Hispanics and Asians were the only groups without notable increases in lenalidomide and bortezomib use, respectively. SCT utilization increased over time for all except African-Americans. SCT use within the first year after diagnosis was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.4-0.68), while bortezomib use was associated with inferior survival (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.28). We noted considerable variability in MM therapeutics utilization with seeming inequity for racial-ethnic minorities. These trends should be considered to eliminate drug access and utilization disparities and achieve equitable benefit of therapeutic advances across all races.

Racial disparities in treatment use for multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Recent treatment advances have greatly improved the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma. However, some of these newer, more effective treatments are intensive and expensive and their use remains low, particularly among black patients. METHODS: In the current study, the authors reviewed the use patterns of stem cell transplantation and bortezomib using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. RESULTS: After controlling for overall health and potential access barriers, black patients were found to be 37% (P<.0001) less likely to undergo stem cell transplantation, and 21% (P<.0001) less likely to be treated with bortezomib. Moreover, the authors found that the underuse of these treatments was associated with a 12% increase in the hazard ratio for death among black patients (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Eliminating health disparities, a current focus of US public policy, is highly complex, as illustrated by the results of the current study. In patients with multiple myeloma, treatment disparities are not completely explained by potential access barriers. Additional factors, such as structural barriers in the health care system and individual decision making among black and white patients, must be explored to fully explain the disparity. Cancer 2017;123:1590-1596. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

[Cell-based therapy to treat stress urinary incontinence: which cell type at what cost?]. / Zellbasierte Therapie der Belastungsinkontinenz: Welche Zelle zu welchen Kosten?

In Germany, 6-8 million woman and men suffer urinary incontinence, which represents 12.5 % of the population. It is estimated that by the middle of this century, it will increase to almost 30 %. The primary reason will be primarily related to the aging population but also to patient awareness and seeking a solution. In addition to the cost which is covered by the health insurance, the patient will spend more than half a billion euro/year out-of-pocket, not to mention the social stigma associated with urinary incontinence. The current common treatment options are symptomatic but do not restore functionality. One option might be tissue engineering or stem cell therapy. This article describes the likelihood that this therapy will change the approach in treating stress urinary incontinence. Boundaries and legal aspects are highlighted as well as approximated cost. These treatment costs might be currently higher than the standard treatment options, but the investment to reduce these costs are paid indirectly by society.

Global update: USA.

Despite the political nature of stem cell research, this area of science continues to flourish in the USA. In 2011, the NIH funded approximately US$1.2 billion in stem cell research - a steady increase from past years - with US$123 million devoted to human embryonic stem cells. According to the ISI Web of Science, more than 4000 US-authored stem cell publications were produced in 2011, accounting for approximately 38% of the world total. Approximately a quarter of these publications were collaborations with authors from other countries.

Costs and cost-effectiveness of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children are predictable.

The overall costs of pediatric stem cell transplantation (SCT), including donor search and costs during the first year post-SCT, were calculated in a cohort of 141 consecutive children undergoing SCT in a single institution. Costs were correlated with patient and transplantation characteristics and with a risk score for transplantation-related mortality. Cost-effectiveness was calculated based on the overall cost per surviving patient. Life-years gained were extrapolated from overall survival, and the costs per expected life-year gained were calculated. The overall median cost was €136,382 (175,815$), with a wide range, of €26,897 (34,679$) to €601,348 (775,343$). Increased costs were significantly associated with age, use of donors other than matched siblings, and advanced disease. There was a strong correlation of costs with a simple transplantation-related mortality risk score; median total costs were €89,550 (115,463$) for a score of 0, €127,349 (164,179$) for a score of 1, €156,578 (201,861$) for a score of 2, and €274,915 (354,499$) for a score of 3 (P < .001). Cost-effectiveness decreased with increasing transplantation-related mortality risk score; costs per survivor increased from €93,209 (120,200$) for a score of 0 to a maximum of €1,216,348 (1,568,579$) for a score of 3. Costs associated with pediatric SCT vary substantially; however, the combination of variables such as age, disease, and donor type is predictive of costs and cost-effectiveness. Costs per life-year gained are within the broadly accepted range in life-threatening hemato-oncologic diseases, even in the most cost-intensive patient cohort.

Role of transfusion in stem cell transplantation: a freedom-from-transfusion (FFT), cost and survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of blood products is often necessary for patients undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT). The need for red cell and platelet transfusion may vary significantly depending on the type of transplantation and underlying disease. METHODS: In an attempt to evaluate the need and volume of transfusions in patients undergoing SCT at University of Kansas Medical Center, the authors retrospectively evaluated the transfusion data of all patients who received SCT between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS: A total of 138 (90%) out of 154 patients undergoing autologous SCT and 24 (43%) out of 56 patients with allogeneic SCT exhibited total hematopoietic engraftment and freedom from transfusion (FFT). Time to achieve FFT (median; range) for RBC units for autologous SCT (12; 0-183) was significantly shorter compared with allogeneic SCT (16.5; 0-373). Number of RBC units (median; range) transfused were significantly less in patients undergoing autologous SCT (4; 0-26) compared to patients undergoing allogeneic SCT (6.5; 0-54). The median cost of transfusion was significantly higher in patients undergoing allogeneic SCT (red cell: $2,015; platelet: $4,480) compared to patients undergoing autologous SCT (red cell: $1,240; platelet: $2,520). The authors recognize that this was a retrospective single-center study and practice guidelines may vary from center to center. CONCLUSION: Authors conclude that transfusion of blood products is an expensive but integral part of SCT, more so for allogeneic SCT than for patients undergoing autologous SCT. Total FFT is a desirable long-term goal of successful marrow transplantation.

Medicine on the fringe: stem cell-based interventions in advance of evidence.

Stem cell-based interventions (SCBIs) offer great promise; however, there is currently little internationally accepted, scientific evidence supporting the clinical use of SCBIs. The consensus within the scientific community is that a number of hurdles still need to be cleared. Despite this, SCBIs are currently being offered to patients. This article provides a content analysis of materials obtained from SCBI providers. We find content that strains credulity and almost no evidence of SCBIs being delivered in the context of clinical trials. We conclude that until scientific evidence is available, as a general rule, providers should only offer SCBIs in the context of controlled clinical trials. Clients should be aware that the risks and benefits of SCBIs are unknown, that their participation is unlikely to advance scientific knowledge, and they are likely to become ineligible to participate in future clinical trials of SCBIs. We recommend steps to promote patient education and enhance global oversight.