Provider utilization of high-risk donor organs and nucleic acid testing: results of two national surveys.

Fears of infectious transmission from CDC high-risk donors (HRDs) remain a significant disincentive, and the potential for human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV) nucleic acid testing (NAT) to allay these fears remains unstudied. We hypothesized that NAT, which narrows the window period between infection and detectability compared to the standard ELISA, might lead to increased provider willingness to use HRDs. Between January and April 2008, we performed two national surveys: one of current NAT practice among organ procurement organizations (OPOs); a second of HRD use among transplant surgeons. Surgeons who reported accepting 10% or more offers for a given HRD behavior and organ type were classified as 'high utilizers' of that subgroup. We built hierarchical models to examine associations between OPO NAT performance and provider utilization. Providers who ranked medical risks of HIV or HCV as important disincentives to HRD use had significantly lower odds of being high utilizers (HIV odds ratio 0.22, HCV odds ratio 0.41, p < 0.005). Furthermore, both HIV and HCV NAT performance were associated with significantly higher odds of being high utilizers (HIV odds ratio 1.58, HCV 2.69, p < 0.005). The demonstrated associations between OPO NAT performance and high provider utilization of HRDs should be considered in the ongoing debate about NAT in transplantation.

Lung transplantation in the United States, 1998-2007.

This article highlights trends and changes in lung and heart-lung transplantation in the United States from 1998 to 2007. The most significant change over the last decade was implementation of the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) allocation system in May 2005. Subsequently, the number of active wait-listed lung candidates declined 54% from pre-LAS (2004) levels to the end of 2007; there was also a reduction in median waiting time, from 792 days in 2004 to 141 days in 2007. The number of lung transplants performed yearly increased through the decade to a peak of 1 465 in 2007; the greatest single year increase occurred in 2005. Despite candidates with increasingly higher LAS scores being transplanted in the LAS era, recipient death rates have remained relatively stable since 2003 and better than in previous years. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis became the most common diagnosis group to receive a lung transplant in 2007 while emphysema was the most common diagnosis in previous years. The number of retransplants and transplants in those aged > or =65 performed yearly have increased significantly since 1998, up 295% and 643%, respectively. A decreasing percentage of lung transplant recipients are children (3.5% in 2007, n = 51). With LAS refinement ongoing, monitoring of future impact is warranted.

Heart and lung transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005.

This article examines the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on heart and lung transplantation in the United States from 1996 to 2005. The number of heart transplants performed and the size of the heart waiting list continued to drop, reaching 2126 and 1334, respectively, in 2005. Over the decade, post-transplant graft and patient survival improved, as did the chances for survival while on the heart waiting list. The number of deceased donor lung transplants increased by 78% since 1996, reaching 1407 in 2005 (up 22% from 2004). There were 3170 registrants awaiting lung transplantation at the end of 2005, down 18% from 2004. Death rates for both candidates and recipients have been dropping, as has the time spent waiting for a lung transplant. Other lung topics covered are living donation, recent surgical advances and changes in immunosuppression regimens. Heart-lung transplantation has declined to a small (33 procedures in 2005) but important need in the United States.

Thoracic organ transplantation.

This article presents an overview of factors associated with thoracic transplantation outcomes over the past decade and provides valuable information regarding the heart, lung, and heart-lung waiting lists and thoracic organ transplant recipients. Waiting list and post-transplant information is used to assess the importance of patient demographics, risk factors, and primary cardiopulmonary disease on outcomes. The time that the typical listed patient has been waiting for a heart, lung, or heart-lung transplant has markedly increased over the past decade, while the number of transplants performed has declined slightly and survival after transplant has plateaued. Waiting list mortality, however, appears to be declining for each organ and for most diseases and high-severity subgroups, perhaps in response to recent changes in organ allocation algorithms. Based on perceived inequity in organ access and in response to a mandate from Health Resources and Services Administration, the lung transplant community is developing a lung allocation system designed to minimize deaths on the waiting list while maximizing the benefit of transplant by incorporating post-transplant survival and quality of life into the algorithm. Areas where improved data collection could inform evolving organ allocation and candidate selection policies are emphasized.

A decade of lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The experience accrued at the University of Pittsburgh between March 1982 and December 1992 in the various forms of lung transplantation, including heart-lung, double lung, and single lung, is discussed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Heart-lung (n = 97) was the most commonly performed operation followed by double lung (n = 80) and single lung (n = 68). Major indications included primary pulmonary hypertension (n = 76), obstructive lung disease (n = 57), Eisenmenger's syndrome (n = 42), cystic fibrosis (n = 32), and retransplantation (n = 13). Since May 1991, 115 procedures have been performed and heart-lung transplantation has decreased from 61% to 15% of the cases with a corresponding doubling in double lung from 24% to 43% and single lung from 15% to 42%. RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates in all 232 recipients were 61%, 55%, and 44%, respectively. The actuarial survival rate was significantly better for those 107 recent recipients compared to the 125 early recipients (70% vs. 61%). Overall, the 63 single (70%) and 74 double (65%) lung procedures were more successful than heart-lung transplantation (53%). Recently, however, lung transplantation has been associated with an improvement in the survival rate from 48% to 72%. The survival rate has also improved from 53% to 77% for single lung transplant recipients. The causes of death in 106 recipients included infection (n = 40), early allograft dysfunction (n = 23), obliterative bronchiolitis (n = 13), and inoperative bleeding (n = 10). Poor outcomes also included technical problems (n = 6), lymphoma (n = 4), acute rejection (n = 3), diaphragmatic paralysis (n = 2), multisystem organ failure (n = 2), stroke (n = 2), liver failure (n = 1), and airway dehiscence (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outlook for lung transplant recipients has improved. There appears to be significant conservation of organs with single lung and double lung transplantation, finding greater acceptance for diseases once exclusively treated by heart-lung transplantation alone. The improved long-term outlook will be dependent upon better treatment for chronic rejection of the airways that histologically is defined by obliterative bronchiolitis.

Heart and heart-lung transplantation.

The fields of heart and combined heart-lung transplantation continue to evolve, allowing treatment of more individuals with end-stage heart and lung disease. The postoperative course and rehabilitation phase may be arduous, emphasizing the importance of selecting candidates who meet specific medical and psychosocial criteria. Life-long immunosuppression and meticulous long-term medical surveillance are mandatory practices to promote the health of the recipient. The major complications that contribute to morbidity and mortality, especially during the first post-transplant year, are infection and rejection. Graft atherosclerosis, obliterative bronchiolitis, and malignancy are long-term complications that may limit survival. In spite of the emotional and physical challenges related to potentially life-threatening complications and other disturbances in daily living, the quality of life for most recipients has markedly improved.