Adherence to GLP1-RA and SGLT2-I affects clinical outcomes and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of adherence to glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose transporter two inhibitors (SGLT2-I) on clinical outcomes and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 121,115 residents of the Lombardy Region (Italy) aged ≥40 years newly treated with metformin during 2007-2015 were followed to identify those who started therapy with GLP1-RA or SGLT2-I. Adherence to drug therapy over the first year was defined as the proportion of days covered >80%. Within each drug class, for each adherent patient, one non-adherent patient was matched for age, sex, duration, adherence to metformin treatment and propensity score. The primary clinical outcome was a composite of insulin initiation, hospitalisation for micro- and macrovascular complications and all-cause mortality after the first year of drug treatment. Costs were evaluated based on reimbursements from the national healthcare system. RESULTS: After matching, 1182 pairs of adherent and non-adherent GLP1-RA users and 1126 pairs of adherent and non-adherent SGLT2-I users were included. In both groups, adherent patients experienced a significantly lower incidence of the primary outcome (HR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-0.98 for GLP1-RA and HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87 for SGLT2-I). A significant reduction in hospitalizations was found for adherent patients in the GLP1-RA group but not for the SGLT2-I group. Results were consistent when analyses were stratified by age and sex. While higher drug-related costs in the adherent group were counterbalanced by decreased hospitalisation costs in SGLT2-I treated patients, this was not the case for GLP1-RA. CONCLUSIONS: Higher adherence to drug treatment with GLP1-RA and SGLT2-I during the first year of the drug intake is associated with a lower incidence of adverse clinical outcomes in a real-world setting.

Causal Estimation of Long-term Intervention Cost-effectiveness Using Genetic Instrumental Variables: An Application to Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This article demonstrates a means of assessing long-term intervention cost-effectiveness in the absence of data from randomized controlled trials and without recourse to Markov simulation or similar types of cohort simulation. METHODS: Using a Mendelian randomization study design, we developed causal estimates of the genetically predicted effect of bladder, breast, colorectal, lung, multiple myeloma, ovarian, prostate, and thyroid cancers on health care costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) using outcome data drawn from the UK Biobank cohort. We then used these estimates in a simulation model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical population-wide preventative intervention based on a repurposed class of antidiabetic drugs known as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors very recently shown to reduce the odds of incident prostate cancer. RESULTS: Genetic liability to prostate cancer and breast cancer had material causal impacts on either or both health care costs and QALYs. Mendelian randomization results for the less common cancers were associated with considerable uncertainty. SGLT2 inhibition was unlikely to be a cost-effective preventative intervention for prostate cancer, although this conclusion depended on the price at which these drugs would be offered for a novel anticancer indication. IMPLICATIONS: Our new causal estimates of cancer exposures on health economic outcomes may be used as inputs into decision-analytic models of cancer interventions such as screening programs or simulations of longer-term outcomes associated with therapies investigated in randomized controlled trials with short follow-ups. Our method allowed us to rapidly and efficiently estimate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical population-scale anticancer intervention to inform and complement other means of assessing long-term intervention value. HIGHLIGHTS: The article demonstrates a novel method of assessing long-term intervention cost-effectiveness without relying on randomized controlled trials or cohort simulations.Mendelian randomization was used to estimate the causal effects of certain cancers on health care costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) using data from the UK Biobank cohort.Given causal data on the association of different cancer exposures on costs and QALYs, it was possible to simulate the cost-effectiveness of an anticancer intervention.Genetic liability to prostate cancer and breast cancer significantly affected health care costs and QALYs, but the hypothetical intervention using SGLT2 inhibitors for prostate cancer may not be cost-effective, depending on the drug's price for the new anticancer indication. The methods we propose and implement can be used to efficiently estimate intervention cost-effectiveness and to inform decision making in all manner of preventative and therapeutic contexts.

SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic retinopathy progression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors affect progression of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) compared to standard of care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared subjects enrolled in a commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database who filled a prescription for a SGLT2 inhibitor between 2013 and 2020 to unexposed controls, matched up to a 1:3 ratio. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled for less than 2 years in the plan, had no prior ophthalmologic exam, had no diagnosis of NPDR, had a diagnosis of diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), had received treatment for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), or were younger than 18 years. To balance covariates of interest between the cohorts, an inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score for SGLT2 inhibitor exposure was used. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) for VTDR, PDR, or DME relative to SGLT2 exposure. RESULTS: A total of 6065 patients who initiated an SGLT2 inhibitor were matched to 12,890 controls. There were 734 (12%), 657 (10.8%), and 72 (1.18%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, in the SGLT2 inhibitor cohort. Conversely, there were 1479 (11.4%), 1331 (10.3%), and 128 (0.99%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, among controls. After IPTW, Cox regression analysis showed no difference in hazard for VTDR, PDR, or DME in the SGLT2 inhibitor-exposed cohort relative to the unexposed group [HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15 for VTDR; HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14 for DME; HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.67 for PDR]. CONCLUSION: Exposure to SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was not associated with progression of NPDR compared to patients receiving other diabetic therapies.

Risk Assessment of Kidney Disease Progression and Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibition in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk assessment tool to identify patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at higher risk for kidney disease progression and who might benefit more from sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 41,204 patients with T2D from four Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) clinical trials were divided into derivation (70%) and validation cohorts (30%). Candidate predictors of kidney disease progression (composite of sustained ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], end-stage kidney disease, or kidney death) were selected with multivariable Cox regression. Efficacy of dapagliflozin was assessed by risk categories (low: <0.5%; intermediate: 0.5 to <2%; high: ≥2%) in Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events (DECLARE)-TIMI 58. RESULTS: There were 695 events over a median follow-up of 2.4 years. The final model comprised eight independent predictors of kidney disease progression: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, systolic blood pressure, T2D duration, glycated hemoglobin, eGFR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and hemoglobin. The c-indices were 0.798 (95% CI, 0.774-0.821) and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.765-0.831) in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plot slope (deciles of predicted vs. observed risk) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93-1.04) in the validation cohort. Whereas relative risk reductions with dapagliflozin did not differ across risk categories, there was greater absolute risk reduction in patients with higher baseline risk, with a 3.5% absolute risk reduction in kidney disease progression at 4 years in the highest risk group (≥1%/year). Results were similar with the 2022 Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium risk prediction model. CONCLUSIONS: Risk models for kidney disease progression can be applied in patients with T2D to stratify risk and identify those who experience a greater magnitude of benefit from SGLT2 inhibition.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and non-small cell lung cancer survival.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a relatively new class of antidiabetic drugs with demonstrated renal and cardiovascular disease benefit. This study evaluates the role of SGLT2 inhibitors on the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We used National Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data. Twenty four thousand nine hundred fifteen NSCLC patients newly diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 with pre-exiting diabetes and aged 66 years or older were included and followed to the end of 2019. Information on SGLT2 inhibitors use was extracted from the Medicare Part D file. RESULTS: SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with significantly reduced mortality risk after adjusting for potential confounders (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60-0.77) with stronger association for longer duration of use (HR = 0.54, 85% CI = 0.44-0.68). Further, we found that SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a significant reduced risk of mortality regardless of patients' demographic, tumour characteristics and cancer treatments. CONCLUSION: Our large SEER-Medicare linked data study indicates that SGLT2 inhibitors use was associated with improved overall survival of NSCLC patients with pre-existing diabetes. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and elucidate the possible mechanisms behind the association.

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy compared to SGLT2-inhibitors and usual care in treating diabetic kidney disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To simulate the cost-effectiveness of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell (MSC) therapy compared to sodium/glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) or usual care (UC) in treating patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: This Markov-chain Monte Carlo model adopted a societal perspective and simulated 10,000 patients with DKD eligible for MSC therapy alongside UC using a lifetime horizon. This cohort was compared with an SGLT2i alongside UC arm and a UC only arm. Model input data were extracted from the literature. A threshold of $47,000 per quality-adjusted life year and a discount rate of 3% were used. The primary outcome measure was incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine: parameter uncertainty; threshold effects regarding MSC effectiveness and cost; and INMB according to patient age (71 vs 40 years), sex, and jurisdiction (UK, Italy and Ireland). RESULTS: While MSC was more cost-effective than UC, both the UC and MSC arms were dominated by SLGT2i. Relative to SGLT2i, the INMB's for MSC and UC were -$4,158 and -$10,085 respectively indicating that SGLT2i, MSC and UC had a 64%, 34% and 1% probability of being cost-effective at the given threshold, respectively. This pattern was consistent across most scenarios; driven by the relatively low cost of SGLT2i and demonstrated class-effect in delaying kidney failure and all-cause mortality. When examining younger patients at baseline, SGLT2i was still the most cost-effective but MSC performed better against UC given the increased lifetime benefit from delaying progression to ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base regarding the effectiveness of MSC therapy continues to evolve. The potential for these therapies to reverse kidney damage would see large improvements in their cost-effectiveness as would targeting such therapies at younger patients and/or those for whom SGLT2i is contra-indicated.

First-Line Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists : A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) receptor agonists as second-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. Expanding their use as first-line therapy has been proposed but the clinical benefits may not outweigh their costs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of a strategy of first-line SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP1 receptor agonists. DESIGN: Individual-level Monte Carlo-based Markov model. DATA SOURCES: Randomized trials, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention databases, RED BOOK, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. TARGET POPULATION: Drug-naive U.S. patients with type 2 diabetes. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care sector. INTERVENTION: First-line SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP1 receptor agonists. OUTCOME MEASURES: Life expectancy, lifetime costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: First-line SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists had lower lifetime rates of congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared with metformin. First-line SGLT2 inhibitors cost $43 000 more and added 1.8 quality-adjusted months versus first-line metformin ($478 000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]). First-line injectable GLP1 receptor agonists cost more and reduced QALYs compared with metformin. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: By removing injection disutility, first-line GLP1 receptor agonists were no longer dominated (ICER, $327 000 per QALY). Oral GLP1 receptor agonists were not cost-effective (ICER, $823 000 per QALY). To be cost-effective at under $150 000 per QALY, costs for SGLT2 inhibitors would need to be under $5 per day and under $6 per day for oral GLP1 receptor agonists. LIMITATION: U.S. population and costs not generalizable internationally. CONCLUSION: As first-line agents, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists would improve type 2 diabetes outcomes, but their costs would need to fall by at least 70% to be cost-effective. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: American Diabetes Association.

Mode of action and human relevance assessment of male CD-1 mouse renal adenocarcinoma associated with lifetime exposure to empagliflozin.

Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) has been shown to be a safe and efficacious approach to support managing Type 2 diabetes. In the 2-year carcinogenicity study with the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in CD-1 mice, an increased incidence of renal tubular adenomas and carcinomas was identified in the male high-dose group but was not observed in female mice. An integrated review of available nonclinical data was conducted to establish a mode-of-action hypothesis for male mouse-specific tumorigenesis. Five key events were identified through systematic analysis to form the proposed mode-of-action: (1) Background kidney pathology in CD-1 mice sensitizes the strain to (2) pharmacology-related diuretic effects associated with SGLT2 inhib ition. (3) In male mice, metabolic demand increases with the formation of a sex- and species-specific empagliflozin metabolite. These features converge to (4) deplete oxidative stress handling reserve, driving (5) constitutive cellular proliferation in male CD-1 mice. The proposed mode of action requires all five key events for empagliflozin to present a carcinogenicity risk in the CD-1 mouse. Considering that empagliflozin is not genotoxic in the standard battery of genotoxicity tests, and not all five key events are present in the context of female mice, rats, or humans, nor for other osmotic diuretics or other SGLT2 inhibitors, the observed male mouse renal tumors are not considered relevant to humans.

Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Non-diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In the USA, chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 1 in 7 adults and costs $100 billion annually. The DAPA-CKD trial found dapagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, to be effective in reducing CKD progression and mortality in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic CKD. Currently, SGLT2 inhibitors are not considered standard of care for patients with non-diabetic CKD. OBJECTIVE: Determine the cost-effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin to standard management of patients with non-diabetic CKD. DESIGN: Markov model with lifetime time horizon and US healthcare sector perspective. PATIENTS: Patients with non-diabetic CKD INTERVENTION: Dapagliflozin plus standard care versus standard care only. MAIN MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), all discounted at 3% annually; total incidence of kidney failure on kidney replacement therapy; average years on kidney replacement therapy. KEY RESULTS: Adding dapagliflozin to standard care improved life expectancy by 2 years, increased discounted QALYS (from 6.75 to 8.06), and reduced the total incidence of kidney failure on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (from 17.4 to 11.0%) and average years on KRT (from 0.77 to 0.43) over the lifetime of the cohort. Dapagliflozin plus standard care was more effective than standard care alone while increasing lifetime costs (from $245,900 to $324,8900, or $60,000 per QALY gained). Results were robust to variations in assumptions about dapagliflozin's efficacy over time and by CKD stage, added costs of kidney replacement therapy, and expected population annual CKD progression rates and sensitive to the cost of dapagliflozin. The net 1-year budgetary implication of treating all US patients with non-diabetic CKD could be up to $21 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin improved life expectancy and reduced progression of CKD, the proportion of patients requiring kidney replacement therapy, and time on kidney replacement therapy in patients with non-diabetic CKD. Use of dapagliflozin meets conventional criteria for cost-effectiveness.

SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been found to have many benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes. However, whether SGLT2 inhibitors increase the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unknown. We examined the association of AKI hospitalization with prior initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor compared with initiation of a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor or a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) among older adults with type 2 diabetes in routine practice. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Older adults aged at least 66 years with type 2 diabetes enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service and who were new users of SGLT2 inhibitor, DPP-4 inhibitor, or GLP-1RA agents in the interval from March 2013 to December 2017. EXPOSURES: New use of an SGLT2 inhibitor versus new use of a DPP-4 inhibitor or GLP-1RA. OUTCOME: The primary outcome was hospitalization for AKI, defined as a discharge diagnosis of AKI in the primary or secondary position. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: New users of SGLT2 inhibitors were matched at a 1:1 ratio to new users of DPP-4 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs using propensity scores in 2 pairwise comparisons. Cox proportional hazards regression models generated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs in propensity score-matched groups. RESULTS: Totals of 68,130 and 71,477 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors were matched to new users of DPP-4 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs, respectively. Overall, the mean age of study participants was 72 years. The risk of AKI was lower in the SGLT2 inhibitor group than in the DPP-4 inhibitor group (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.65-0.76]) or the GLP-1RA group (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.75-0.87]). LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding and lack of laboratory data. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with type 2 diabetes, initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with a reduced risk of AKI compared with initiation of a DPP-4 inhibitor or a GLP-1RA.

Non-invasive assessment of exfoliated kidney cells extracted from urine using multispectral autofluorescence features.

Optimally preserved urinary exfoliated renal proximal tubule cells were assessed by multispectral imaging of cell autofluorescence. We demonstrated different multispectral autofluorescence signals in such cells extracted from the urine of patients with healthy or diseased kidneys. Using up to 10 features, we were able to differentiate cells from individuals with heathy kidneys and impaired renal function (indicated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values) with the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99. Using the same method, we were also able to discriminate such urine cells from patients with and without renal fibrosis on biopsy, where significant differences in multispectral autofluorescence signals (AUC = 0.90) were demonstrated between healthy and diseased patients (p < 0.05). These findings show that multispectral assessment of the cell autofluorescence in urine exfoliated proximal tubule kidney cells has the potential to be developed as a sensitive, non-invasive diagnostic method for CKD.

Pharmacovigilance assessment of the association between Fournier's gangrene and other severe genital adverse events with SGLT-2 inhibitors.

Objective: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) exert cardiorenal protection in people with diabetes. By inducing glycosuria, SGLT2i predispose to genital infections. In addition, rare occurrence of Fournier's gangrene (FG) has been reported. We aimed to investigate such association through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event (AE) reporting system (FAERS). Research design and methods: We mined the FAERS up to 2018q3 (before FDA warning about SGLT2i-associated FG) to retrieve reports including FG as an AE and SGLT2i as suspect or concomitant drugs, and calculated proportional reporting ratios (PRR). Results: We retrieved 47 cases of FG and 17 cases of other severe AEs of the genital area associated with SGLT2i. Patients with FG were ~10 years older than those with other severe genital AEs. Overall, 77% occurred in men. Three patients were concomitantly treated with systemic immunosuppressive drugs. Increased reporting frequency emerged for SGLT2i compared with other drugs, with a PRR ranging from 5 to 10. The disproportional reporting of FG with SGLT2i remained robust and consistently significant when restricting to the period when SGLT2i were available, to reports filed for glucose-lowering medications or for drugs with the diabetes indication, and after refining the definition of FG. FG was disproportionally associated with psoriasis and with the combination of immunosuppressants and SGLT2i. Conclusions: Although causality cannot be demonstrated, SGLT2i may predispose to FG and other severe genital AEs. Since the use of SGLT2i is expected to increase significantly, clinicians should be aware of these severe, although rare, AEs and their predisposing factors.

Eficacia y seguridad de empagliflozina en pacientes adultos con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 no controlada, con enfermedad cardiovascular establecida / Eficácia e segurança da empagliflozina em pacientes adultos com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 sem controle, com doença cardiovascular estabelecida

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de empagliflozina 25 mg asociada a insulina y metformina, en comparación con insulina y metformina, en pacientes adultos con DM2 no controlada, con ECV establecida. La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) es una enfermedad caracterizada por una interacción compleja entre diversos genes y factores ambientales que condicionan resistencia a la insulina o una deficiencia relativa de insulina. A nivel mundial, habrían alrededor de 425 millones de personas con diabetes, estimándose que la mitad se encuentran sin diagnóstico. En el Perú, la diabetes afectaría al 7 % de la población, siendo el 96.8 % del total afectados por DM2, y sería responsable del 31.5 % de los infartos de miocardio (IMA) y el 25 % de los accidentes cerebrovasculares (ACV). El tratamiento farmacológico de la DM2 incluye a la metformina, otros antidiabéticos orales y la posibilidad del empleo de terapias en base a insulina o la adición de otro agente farmacológico al esquema terapéutico en caso de no controlar adecuadamente la glucemia. En EsSalud se dispone de agentes antidiabéticos orales y de diferentes tipos de insulina (regular [cristalina], NPH humana, lispro y glargina). A pesar de ello, existe el interés en disminuir la probabilidad de eventos cardiovasculares en pacientes que presentan DM2 y una enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) establecida. Por ello, los médicos especialistas solicitan la evaluación de uso de empagliflozina asociado a insulina y metformina para pacientes con DM2 no controlada con ECV establecida, considerando que este podría ofrecer un beneficio adicional de disminución de eventos cardiovasculares. TECNOLOGÍA SANITARIA DE INTERÉS: Empagliflozina es un inhibidor competitivo reversible y selectivo altamente potente del cotransportador de sodio-glucosa tipo 2 (SGLT2). El transportador SGLT2 es responsable, como transportador predominante, de la reabsorción de glucosa tras la filtración glomerular para devolverla a la circulación, con lo cual se esperaría mejorar el control glucémico de los pacientes con DM2. Empagliflozina de 10 mg y de 25 mg ha sido aprobada para su comercialización en el 2014 por la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) y la European Medicines Agency (EMA), como tratamiento adjunto, a la dieta y el ejercicio, para mejorar el control glucémico en adultos con DM2. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de literatura con el objetivo de identificar evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad de empagliflozina en pacientes adultos con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 no controlada, con ECV establecida. Para identificar documentos de interés, se buscó evidencia disponible en las siguientes bases de datos bibliográficas: PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library y LILACS. Adicionalmente, se realizó una búsqueda en sitios web pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, incluyendo The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), el portal BRISA (Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas), y sitios web de organizaciones internacionales en endocrinología. Por último, se llevó a cabo una búsqueda manual en el portal ClinicalTrials.gov del National Institutes of Health y en el sitio web PROSPERO del Centre for Reviews and Dissemination de la University of York. RESULTADOS: La GPC de la ADA señala específicamente para pacientes con DM2 y ECV que se puede agregar un medicamento antihiperglucémico que haya demostrado reducir los eventos cardiovasculares mayores y la mortalidad cardiovascular, incluyendo empagliflozina dentro del listado de posibles medicamentos. Para emitir esta recomendación, ADA señala al estudio EMPA-REG OUTCOME, documento descrito en el presente dictamen. Por otro lado, la GPC de SIGN no menciona a la empagliflozina dentro de las alternativas a brindar a pacientes con DM2 y ECV establecida, señalando además que no existe evidencia sólida para asegurar beneficio de algún grupo farmacológico en desenlaces cardiovasculares para pacientes con DM2. Las tres ETS identificadas evaluaron el uso de empagliflozina adicionada a la insulina en la población general de pacientes con DM2 y no en el subgrupo específico de pacientes con ECV establecida, por lo que las recomendaciones emitidas no fueron elaboradas en base a desenlaces clínicamente relevantes para este grupo de pacientes, como los eventos cardiovasculares. No obstante, se observó que tanto NICE como SMC recomiendan el uso de empagliflozina añadida a la terapia con insulina para mejorar los valores de la hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1C). En contraste, IQWIG concluye que no existe evidencia que permita analizar la utilidad de adicionar empagliflozina a un régimen terapéutico de insulina con o sin un agente antidiabético. CONCLUSIONES: En el presente documento, se evaluó la mejor evidencia científica disponible hasta marzo 2019 en relación a la eficacia y seguridad de empagliflozina 25 mg asociada a insulina y metformina, en comparación con insulina y metformina, en pacientes adultos con DM2 no controlada y ECV establecida. En relación a la GPC de ADA se menciona que se puede adicionar un medicamento antihiperglucémico que haya demostrado reducir eventos cardiovasculares mayores o mortalidad de origen cardiovascular, incluyendo dentro de esta posibilidad a la empagliflozina. Para esta recomendación, ADA empleó los datos del estudio EMPA-REG OUTCOME, documento descrito en este dictamen. La GPC de SIGN menciona que, a la fecha de su elaboración, no existe evidencia del beneficio de algún grupo farmacológico para el tratamiento de la DM en desenlaces cardiovasculares. Las ETS de NICE y SMC encuentran beneficio en adicionar empagliflozina a regímenes terapéuticos de insulina, siendo este beneficio dado para el control glucémico de la enfermedad, no habiéndose evaluado el beneficio de adicionar empagliflozina en eventos cardiovasculares para el paciente con DM2 no controlada y ECV establecida. IQWIG menciona que no se dispuso de evidencia para analizar la utilidad de adicionar empagliflozina a un régimen terapéutico de insulina con o sin un agente antidiabético. De esta forma, se observó una discordancia entre las conclusiones elaboradas por las agencias de ETS, las que a su vez no fueron específicas para la población de interés ni evaluaron desenlaces de relevancia para la población de interés (eventos cardiovasculares). El estudio EMPA-REG OUTCOME, estudio aleatorizado, doble ciego, fase III, controlado por placebo, de no inferioridad, evaluó los beneficios de adicionar empagliflozina a la terapia con insulina y metformina en pacientes con DM2 y ECV establecida en la prevención de eventos cardiovasculares. Los resultados mostraron que empagliflozina 25 mg fue no inferior al placebo en la disminución de eventos cardiovasculares. No se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el riesgo de presentar un evento cardiovascular entre ambos brazos de estudio. Sobre la mortalidad, el grupo de empagliflozina presentó menor mortalidad por cualquier causa y menor mortalidad por causa cardiovascular en comparación al grupo control, siendo este resultado de igual forma encontrado para el subgrupo de pacientes que recibía insulina como terapia de base. No se encontró diferencias en el control glucémico (HbA1C). El perfil de seguridad (visto desde los eventos adversos) fue similar para ambos grupos. Se debe precisar que el estudio EMPA-REG OUTCOME aporta evidencia indirecta para responder a la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen, ya que no evaluó el uso de empagliflozina 25 mg agregado a la terapia estándar de interés (insulina con metformina), sino que evaluó su uso en combinación con diferentes tipos de terapia antidiabética, no pudiéndose determinar el número de pacientes que específicamente recibieron las terapias de interés para el presente dictamen (terapia intensiva con insulina más metformina). No obstante, la escasa evidencia a la fecha sugeriría que el empleo de empagliflozina 25 mg brindaría un beneficio en desenlaces clínicos de interés como la mortalidad por cualquier causa y por eventos cardiovasculares en pacientes en terapia con insulina para pacientes con DM2 y ECV establecida. En línea con ello, los expertos señalan que el empleo de empagliflozina, aunque no produjera un beneficio clínicamente significativo en la HBA1C en los pacientes con DM2 y ECV establecida que participaron en el estudio EMPA-REG OUTCOME, podría en la práctica disminuir la dosis de insulina a administrar, lo que generaría un beneficio adicional para el paciente con DM2 y mal control metabólico. El Instituto de Evaluaciones de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, aprueba el uso de empagliflozina 25 mg para pacientes con DM2 no controlada, con ECV establecida. La vigencia del presente dictamen preliminar es de un año a partir de la fecha de publicación. Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de la aparición de nueva e videncia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Replacement Effects and Budget Impacts of Insurance Coverage for Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors on Oral Antidiabetic Drug Utilization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A new oral antidiabetic drug class, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitors), has been covered by national health insurance in Taiwan since May 2016. This study estimated the impacts of insurance coverage for SGLT-2 inhibitors on the replacement effects of antidiabetic drug use and the overall budget for antidiabetic drugs in Taiwan. METHODS: Antidiabetic drugs were divided into nine categories based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. We retrieved claims data from 2015 to 2017 for all patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus from the National Health Insurance Research Database. An interrupted time series design and segmented regression were used to estimate the budget impact of insurance coverage for SGLT-2 inhibitors. Three scenarios were designed for the prescribing pattern for SGLT-2 inhibitors: (1) monotherapy, (2) metformin-based (m-based) drug prescriptions, and (3) metformin and sulfonylurea-based (m-s-based) drug prescriptions. RESULTS: From May 2016 to April 2017, the prescription rate for m-based SGLT-2 inhibitors increased from 0.43 to 3.50%, and the expenditure rate increased from 0.82 to 6.58%. We found that the prescription rates of m-based and m-s-based dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors) decreased by 6.23 and 11.51% following the initiation of insurance coverage for SGLT-2 inhibitors, respectively. Furthermore, there was a 5.95% increase in the overall budget impact of antidiabetic drugs 1 year following the initiation of insurance coverage for SGLT-2 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Both the prescription rates and expenditure rates for SGLT-2 inhibitors have increased since they have been covered by national health insurance in Taiwan, which significantly reduced usage of DPP-4 inhibitors but caused the positive growth of overall antidiabetic drug expenditures.

Nephrotoxicity and Kidney Transport Assessment on 3D Perfused Proximal Tubules.

Proximal tubules in the kidney play a crucial role in reabsorbing and eliminating substrates from the body into the urine, leading to high local concentrations of xenobiotics. This makes the proximal tubule a major target for drug toxicity that needs to be evaluated during the drug development process. Here, we describe an advanced in vitro model consisting of fully polarized renal proximal tubular epithelial cells cultured in a microfluidic system. Up to 40 leak-tight tubules were cultured on this platform that provides access to the basolateral as well as the apical side of the epithelial cells. Exposure to the nephrotoxicant cisplatin caused a dose-dependent disruption of the epithelial barrier, a decrease in viability, an increase in effluent LDH activity, and changes in expression of tight-junction marker zona-occludence 1, actin, and DNA-damage marker H2A.X, as detected by immunostaining. Activity and inhibition of the efflux pumps P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) were demonstrated using fluorescence-based transporter assays. In addition, the transepithelial transport function from the basolateral to the apical side of the proximal tubule was studied. The apparent permeability of the fluorescent P-gp substrate rhodamine 123 was decreased by 35% by co-incubation with cyclosporin A. Furthermore, the activity of the glucose transporter SGLT2 was demonstrated using the fluorescent glucose analog 6-NBDG which was sensitive to inhibition by phlorizin. Our results demonstrate that we developed a functional 3D perfused proximal tubule model with advanced renal epithelial characteristics that can be used for drug screening studies.

[Dapagliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor, Acutely Reduces Energy Expenditure in Brown Adipose Tissue via Neural Signals in Mice].

　Selective sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) treatment promotes urinary glucose excretion, thereby reducing blood glucose as well as body weight. However, only limited body weight reductions are achieved with SGLT2i administration. Hyperphagia is reportedly one of the causes of this limited weight loss. However, the effects of SGLT2i on systemic energy expenditure have not been fully elucidated. We investigated the acute effects of dapagliflozin, an SGLT2i, on systemic energy expenditure in mice. Eighteen hours after dapagliflozin administration, oxygen consumption and brown adipose tissue (BAT) expression of ucp1, a thermogenesis-related gene, were significantly decreased as compared with those after vehicle administration. In addition, dapagliflozin significantly suppressed norepinephrine (NE) turnover in BAT and c-fos expression in the rostral raphe pallidus nucleus (rRPa), which contains the sympathetic premotor neurons responsible for thermogenesis. These findings indicate that the dapagliflozin-mediated acute decrease in energy expenditure involves a reduction in BAT thermogenesis via decreased sympathetic nerve activity from the rRPa. Furthermore, common hepatic branch vagotomy abolished the reductions in ucp1 expression, NE contents in BAT, and c-fos expression in the rRPa. In addition, alterations in hepatic carbohydrate metabolism, such as decreases in glycogen contents and upregulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, occurred prior to the suppression of BAT thermogenesis, e.g., 6 h after dapagliflozin treatment. Collectively, these results suggest that SGLT2i acutely suppresses energy expenditure in BAT via regulation of an interorgan neural network consisting of the common hepatic vagal branch and sympathetic nerves.

The pattern of prescribing of glucose modulating agents for type 2 diabetes in general practices in England 2016/17.

BACKGROUND: In the financial year 2016/17 there were 52.0 million items prescribed for diabetes at a total net ingredient cost of £983.7 million - up from 28.9 million prescription items and £572.4 million in 2006/07. Anti-diabetes drugs (British National Formulary section 6.1.2) make up 45.1 per cent of the total £983.7 million net ingredient cost of drugs used in diabetes and account for 72.0 per cent of prescription items for all diabetes prescribing. METHODS: We examined the way that agents licensed to treat type 2 diabetes were used across GP practices in England in the year 2016/2017. Analysis was at a GP practice level not at the level of patient data. RESULTS: Annual prescribing costs / patient / medication type for monotherapy varied considerable from £11/year for gliclazide and glimepiride to £885/year for Liraglutide. The use of SGLT-2i agents grew strongly at 70% per annum to around 100,000 DDD with prescriptions seen in 95% of GP practices. Liraglutide expenditure (11% of total) was high for a relatively small number of patients (1.3% of Defined Daily Doses), with still significant spend on exenatide. Liraglutide use significantly exceeded that of other glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates the significant cost of medication to modulate tissue glucose levels in type 2 diabetes and the dominance of some non-generic preparations in terms of number of prescriptions and overall spend. There are some older sulphonylureas in use, which should not generally be prescribed. Regular audit of patient treatment at a general practice level will ensure appropriate targeted use of licensed medications and of their cost effectiveness.