UK medical cannabis registry: assessment of clinical outcomes in patients with headache disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Headache disorders are a common cause of disability and reduced health-related quality of life globally. Growing evidence supports the use of cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) for chronic pain; however, a paucity of research specifically focuses on CBMPs' efficacy and safety in headache disorders. This study aims to assess changes in validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with headaches prescribed CBMPs and investigate the clinical safety in this population. METHODS: A case series of the UK Medical Cannabis Registry was conducted. Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in PROMs (Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), EQ-5D-5L, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire and Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (SQS)) at 1-, 3-, and 6-months follow-up. P-values <0.050 were deemed statistically significant. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were identified for inclusion. Improvements in HIT-6, MIDAS, EQ-5D-5L and SQS were observed at 1-, 3-, and 6-months (p < 0.005) follow-up. GAD-7 improved at 1- and 3-months (p < 0.050). Seventeen (17.5%) patients experienced a total of 113 (116.5%) adverse events. CONCLUSION: Improvements in headache/migraine-specific PROMs and general health-related quality of life were associated with the initiation of CBMPs in patients with headache disorders. Cautious interpretation of results is necessary, and randomized control trials are required to ascertain causality.

Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Outpatient Infusion Care Model for the Treatment of Pediatric Headache.

BACKGROUND: Care for pediatric patients with headache often occurs in high-cost settings such as emergency departments (EDs) and inpatient settings. Outpatient infusion centers have the potential to reduce care costs for pediatric headache management. METHODS: In this quality improvement study, we describe our experience in creating the capacity to support an integrated outpatient pediatric headache infusion care model through an infusion center. We compare costs of receiving headache treatment in this model with those in the emergency and inpatient settings. Because dihydroergotamine (DHE) is a costly infusion, encounters at which DHE was administered were analyzed separately. We track the number of ED visits and inpatient admissions for headache using run charts. As a balancing measure, we compare treatment efficacy between the infusion care model and the inpatient setting. RESULTS: The mean percentage increase in cost of receiving headache treatment in the inpatient setting with DHE was 61% (confidence interval [CI]: 30-99%), and that without DHE was 582% (CI: 299-1068%) compared with receiving equivalent treatments in the infusion center. The mean percentage increase in cost of receiving headache treatment in the ED was 30% (CI: -15 to 100%) compared with equivalent treatment in the infusion center. After the intervention, ED visits and inpatient admissions for headache decreased. The mean change in head pain was similar across care settings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that developing an integrated ambulatory care model with infusion capacity for refractory pediatric headache is feasible, and our early outcomes suggest this may have a favorable impact on the overall value of care for this population.

Epidemiology and management of medication-overuse headache in the general population.

Medication-overuse headache is a worldwide challenge as it affects 1-2% of the general population. Some people are more prone to medication overuse, which can be ascertained by applying five simple questions about dependence. Detoxification of the overused medication is a cheap and effective treatment strategy. A short advice seems to be sufficient for people from the general population whom seek their general practitioner. Treatment is often more complicated in neurologist and hospital settings, most likely due to a combination of treatment failure in general practice and co-morbidity of other disorders including different types of headaches.

Shortage of generic neurologic therapeutics: An escalating threat to patient care.

OBJECTIVE: To assess longitudinal trends in shortages of generic drugs used for neurologic conditions over a 15-year period in the United States. METHODS: Drug shortage data from the University of Utah Drug Information Service (UUDIS) from 2001 to 2015 were analyzed. Medications were included that were likely to be prescribed by a neurologist to treat a primary neurologic condition or critical for care of a patient with a neurologic condition. Trends in shortage length were assessed using standard descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 2,081 shortages were reported by UUDIS and 311 (15%) involved medications for neurologic conditions. After excluding discontinued products, 291 shortages were analyzed. The median number of neurologic drugs in shortage was 21 per month with a median duration of 7.4 months. During the three 5-year periods of 2001-2005, 2006-2010, and 2011-2015, a median of 12.5, 14, and 45 drugs were in shortage, respectively. A maximum of 50 drugs in shortage was reached in December 2012 and December 2014. By the end of the study period, 30 neurologic drugs remained in shortage. In over half of the shortages, manufacturers did not provide a reason for the shortage. When reported, manufacturing delays, followed by supply/demand issues, raw material shortages, regulatory issues, and business decisions were cited. CONCLUSIONS: Continued drug shortages may compromise the care of patients with neurologic conditions. Manufacturers, together with professional organizations, patient advocacy groups, and the government, need to continue to address this issue, which may escalate with a growing burden of neurologic disease.

Medical Undergraduate Survey on Headache Education in Singapore: Knowledge, Perceptions, and Assessment of Unmet Needs.

BACKGROUND: There have been no prior studies assessing the status of undergraduate headache training and education in Singapore. Unmet needs of undergraduate medical students in terms of knowledge-practice gaps pertaining to diagnosis and management of headache disorders are unknown. The possible underemphasis of this aspect of the curriculum as compared to other chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus has also not been ascertained. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to assess the knowledge base and perceptions, thereby identifying the unmet needs of headache disorder education in undergraduate medical students. Students reported their perceived time that was devoted to the subject matter and this was recorded and reported. In order to provide a comparative indication on the level of prioritization, the total duration within the syllabus dedicated to headache education vs other chronic diseases (using diabetes mellitus as a surrogate) was sought. METHODS: A comprehensive survey consisting of questions assessing the headache curriculum, knowledge, and perceptions was developed. The questionnaire was distributed to final year medical students attending a full-day Neurology review course in their last semester. Attendees were given the duration of the course to complete the questionnaire, and forms were collected at the end of the day. RESULTS: About 127 final year medical students completed our survey. More than half (55.1%) did not receive formal teaching on how to take a complete headache history. The majority (90.6%) have not attended a headache sub-specialty clinic. The mean total number of hours exposed to headache disorders was 5.69h (SD ± 5.19). The vast majority (96.1%) were unfamiliar with locally published clinical practice guidelines, and a significant proportion (74.0%) were unfamiliar with the third edition (beta) of the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Nearly half (47.2%) were unfamiliar with 'medication overuse headache' as a disease entity. Only one (0.8%) respondent was able to correctly classify all listed primary and secondary headache disorders correctly. Only 37.0% were able to identify all 4 indications (headaches that were new, worsening, and unresponsive to treatment or associated with neurological symptoms) that warranted neuroimaging in a patient with a pre-existing diagnosis of migraine. The antidepressants were the most frequently reported incorrect option for the abortive treatment of migraine (16.5%). Nearly one-fifth (18.9%) were unable to name a single abortive treatment correctly, while a significant proportion (39.4%) could not identify a single correct prophylactic migraine treatment. A large proportion (62.2%) opined that their exposure to 'headache diagnosis and management' was inadequate, with a minority (3.1%) being 'very comfortable' in the diagnosing migraine. A significant proportion felt uncomfortable in treating special population groups diagnosed with migraine - pregnant (79.5%), elderly (48.0%), those with cardiac conditions (51.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The current medical undergraduate curriculum on headache disorders in Singapore may harbor significant unmet needs. A review of the syllabus to increase headache education may be one method to address this gap. Further studies in this area are required.

Opioid use among adolescent patients treated for headache.

PURPOSE: To determine the pervasiveness of opioid prescribing for adolescents with headache and patient and provider characteristics associated with likelihood of opioid prescribing. METHODS: This observational cohort analysis used commercial medical and pharmacy claims between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008. Included were adolescents (13-17 years of age) with newly diagnosed headache, ≥2 distinct claims for headache, and ≥12 months health plan eligibility preindex and postindex. Adolescents with a trauma diagnosis at any point were excluded. The primary outcome was current practice patterns, measured by a number of opioid claims, a percentage of patients prescribed opioids, a number of opioid prescriptions per year, a length of opioid therapy, and a frequency of specific comorbidities. A secondary outcome characterized providers and practice settings, comparing patients who received opioids with those who did not. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of 8,373 adolescents with headache, 46% (3,859 patients) received an opioid prescription. Nearly half (48%) received one opioid prescription during follow-up; 29% received ≥3 opioid prescriptions. Of those with opioid prescriptions, 25% (977 patients) had a migraine diagnosis at index date. Among adolescents who received opioids, 28% (1,076 adolescents) had an emergency department (ED) visit for headache during follow-up versus 14% (608 adolescents) who did not receive opioids (p < .01). ED visits with a headache diagnosis during follow-up were strongly correlated with opioid use after adjusting for other covariates (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-2.29). Despite the treatment guidelines recommending against their use, a large proportion of adolescents with headache were prescribed opioids. ED visits were strongly correlated with opioid prescriptions.

[Something's moving in chronic migraine]. / Algo se mueve en la migraña crónica.

TITLE: Algo se mueve en la migraña cronica.

[Headache]. / Hovedpine.

Headache is the most frequent pain disorder, and 31% of the adult Danish population has sought medical assistance due to headache. In addition, the socio-economic costs of headache are substantial, and a national treatment strategy is therefore important. With respect to treatment of migraine, considerable scientific progress has been made, whereas the scientific interest in and treatment of the highly prevalent tension-type headache are insufficient. The most frequent primary headache disorders, their differential diagnosis and the current treatment strategy are briefly reviewed.

[Patterns of prescription and usage of triptans in Alsace (France): misuse is frequent and avoidable]. / Modes de prescription et de consommation des triptans en Alsace: un mésusage fréquent mais évitable.

AIMS: To analyze use of triptans in the Alsace region of France: patients, disorders motivating, doses, analgesics and migraine prophylactics associated treatments, contra-indications. To study major consumers (more than 144 intakes per year) and to determine among them the proportion who suffering from chronic headache. METHOD: Data concerning all prescriptions of triptans and analgesics as well as migraine prophylaxis prescriptions were obtained from the computer databases of five of the French National Health's local health agencies in Alsace, recorded between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004. Data about motivating disorders and the clinical context were obtained using a questionnaire sent to prescribers. Data about patients with more than 144 intakes per year were provided by medical advisors of French Health insurance. RESULTS: We founded 20686 users: 92.1 percent used between 0 and 6 intakes per month. 11.5 percent of disorders motivating the prescription that were mentioned by prescribers were for off-label use: tension-type headache 2.7 percent, mixed headache, 8.8 percent. Prescribers declared at least one contra-indication for triptan use for 7.8 percent of patients. Over all, prescriptions were off-label for 16.1 percent of patients. Patients who used more than 144 intakes per year accounted for 1.9 percent of the total number and self-medication accounted for 19.2 percent of all triptan intakes. Half of the patients were suffering from daily chronic headache (chronic migraine in 66 percent). 15.6 percent of these patients presented at least one contraindication (high blood pressure or ischemic disease). All in all we estimate that use of triptan is a misuse for 25 percent to 30 percent of the intakes. Quantities of other analgesics used increased simultaneously with triptan use: on average 65, 119 and 244 Defined Daily Doses (DDD)/person/year for patients who used between 1 and 72, 73 and 144 and more than 144 intakes respectively. On average 35.4 percent (in DDD) of analgesics used were opiates (dextropropoxyphene, codeine, tramadol). This proportion increased simultaneously with triptan use: 58.9 percent for major users. Prophylactic treatment for migraine was used by 27.9 percent of the patients: lack of prophylaxis was a prescriber's choice in 90 percent of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of triptan misuse emphasizes the importance of improving prescription of these drugs.

Intensive community pharmacy intervention had little impact on triptan consumption: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an intensive pharmaceutical care campaign targeting inappropriate use of triptans. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 22 community pharmacies in the County of Funen, Denmark. SUBJECTS: A total of 1123 triptan users at intervention pharmacies and 1340 at control pharmacies. INTERVENTION: Intervention pharmacy staff received information on migraine and other types of headache, detection of inappropriate triptan use and other drug-related problems, and techniques for establishing a dialogue with patients. Intervention consisted of a folder and a structured dialogue with the pharmacy staff. The folder included questions aimed at detecting overuse and inappropriate triptan use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in average triptan consumption in doses per month measured by means of a prescription database with information on all purchases of reimbursed drugs at the level of the individual patient. RESULTS: Overall, intervention had no statistically significant short-term impact on patients' consumption of triptans either among incident users (intervention/control ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.12), or among prevalent users (1.02; 0.97 to 1.08). No effects were observed after 6 and 9 months, apart from a possible borderline effect after 9 months among prevalent users with intermediate triptan consumption (0.93; 0.87 to 1.00). CONCLUSION: The pharmaceutical care campaign did not reduce the use of triptans.

Medication overuse headache in patients with primary headache disorders: epidemiology, management and pathogenesis.

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a common medical condition that is associated with considerable long-term morbidity and disability. Patients experiencing MOH have primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache [TTH] or the combination of migraine and TTH) that change to a pattern of daily or near-daily headaches over a period of years or decades following the overuse of symptomatic headache medications. Overused drugs include analgesics, ergot alkaloids, serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists ('triptans') and medications containing barbiturates, codeine, caffeine, tranquillisers and mixed analgesics. Affected patients usually have a long history of primary headache, overuse of medications and MOH before they consult a physician for care. Patients with MOH are usually managed in specialist centres by withdrawal of the overused drugs and treatment of withdrawal symptoms (on an inpatient or outpatient basis), headache prophylaxis and limited use of symptomatic acute medications. Most patients respond to this therapy, although the prognosis is not always good and >or=50% may lapse over an initial 5-year follow-up period. The best practical strategy at present is to prevent the overuse of drugs in the first place by patient education and formal management approaches conducted in primary care to treat the primary headache before it changes to MOH. The quality of the clinical evidence on MOH is suboptimal and further biological and clinical research is urgently required to help facilitate the management of these patients more effectively in the future.

A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based treatment for chronic headache.

Chronic headache is a significant public health problem in Western nations. Although controlled trials demonstrate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of face-to-face behavioral therapy, most headache sufferers have limited access to these treatments. Delivery of behavioral interventions using Internet technology has the potential to reach a larger number of headache sufferers and reduce the burden of disease. This randomized controlled study evaluated an Internet-delivered behavioral regimen composed of progressive relaxation, limited biofeedback with autogenic training, and stress management versus a symptom monitoring waitlist control. Treatment led to a significantly greater decrease in headache activity than symptom monitoring alone. Thirty-nine percent of treated individuals showed clinically significant improvement on self-report measures of headache symptoms at post-treatment. At two-month follow-up, 47% of participants maintained improvement. Treatment had a significant impact on general headache symptoms and headache-related disability. There was a 35% within-group reduction of medication usage among the treated subjects. The Internet program was more time-efficient than traditional clinical treatment. Treatment and follow-up dropout rates, 38.1% and 64.8%, respectively, were typical of behavioral self-help studies. This approach to self-management of headache is promising; however, several methodological and ethical challenges need to be addressed.

[Health care activity in a headache-specific clinic]. / Actividad asistencial en una consulta específica de cefalea.

INTRODUCTION: It is reckoned that headaches affect, at least once a year, around 90% of the population. The socioeconomic repercussion occasioned by this malady justifies the appearance in recent years of headache units. AIM: To conduct a descriptive epidemiological and health care study of the activity carried out in a headache-specific clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All the relevant points from the histories of patients who visited our surgery over a period of two years were collected prospectively and consecutively. The different types of headaches were classified according to the 1988 IHS criteria. Both the symptomatic and the preventive treatment were analysed. RESULTS: In all, a total of 866 patients were found; 691 (79.8%) were females and the mean age was 39.8 +/- 15.9 years (range: 6-90 years); 208 (24%) had a history of migraine in the family; 399 (49.9%) were diagnosed as suffering from migraine: 256 (64.2%) had migraine without aura, 152 (19%) were diagnosed as having tension-type headache, and 218 (27.3%) presented chronic daily headache (CDH). The most frequently used symptomatic treatments were NSAI drugs (36.7%) and triptanes (28.4%). Amitriptyline (47.7%), beta-blockers (14.5%) and calcium antagonists (11.3%) were the main drugs used as preventive treatment. DISCUSSION: After several years' operation of our Headache Unit, we thought there was a need to analyse the population seen in the visits. The fact that the majority of our patients were middle-aged females matched our expectations. Although most of the patients were diagnosed as suffering from M, we also want to highlight the high proportion of cases of CDH, above all associated with the abuse of analgesics.

Impact of a group-based model of disease management for headache.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a group-based model of disease management for patients with headache. BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine, many patients with headache remain misdiagnosed and undertreated. Models of care that incorporate principles of disease management may improve headache care. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, observational study. Patients with headache were referred by physicians or identified from emergency department records. Patients attended a group session led by a registered nurse practitioner, and later had follow-up consultation. Charts and computer records were reviewed to document triptan costs and headache-related visits for 6 months before and after the intervention. Changes in headache frequency and severity were assessed. RESULTS: Triptan costs for 264 patients and chart review for 250 were available. Six-month triptan costs increased $5423 US dollars(19%), headache-related visits were reduced by 32%, and headache-related emergency department visits were reduced by 49%. Severe headache frequency was reduced in 62 (86%) of 72 patients who initially had severe headaches more than 2 days per week. Patients identified by emergency department screening accounted for 21% of the study group, 31% of the baseline triptan costs, and 46% of the baseline visits. For the entire study group, reduced visits yielded a net savings of $18,757 US dollars despite increased triptan costs. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of this group-based model produced a reduction in emergency department and clinic visits, significant clinical improvement, a small increase in pharmacy costs, and overall cost reduction. The greatest improvement in each outcome measure was seen in patients most severely afflicted at baseline. Our results suggest that the principles of disease management may be applied effectively to a headache population, with a positive financial impact on a managed care organization.