Longitudinal assessment of cardiac parameters through MRI in breast cancer patients treated with anti-HER2 therapy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the early changes in left ventricular (LV) volumetric, functional, and tissue characteristics in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab at cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing planned anti-HER2 therapy and nonanthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled and subdivided into dual anti-HER2 (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab) group and trastuzumab group. Cardiac MRI was performed before treatment and three months after starting, covering ventricular volumes, cardiac function, systolic myocardial strain, myocardial oedema, and T1 and T2 relaxation times. Cardiac dysfunction was primarily defined as a > 10% reduction in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) to < 55% and/or a > 15% global longitudinal strain (GLS) change at the follow-up MRI examination. RESULTS: Twenty-four HER2-positive patients were evaluated (16 in the dual anti-HER2 group, 8 in the trastuzumab group). Six patients developed cardiac dysfunction at follow-up, five of them in the dual anti-HER2 group. One patient developed symptomatic heart failure, and five patients developed asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction. Patients displayed significantly decreased systolic function and increased T1 and T2 relaxation time at follow-up (p ≤ 0.031). Systolic dysfunction remained significant in the dual anti-HER2 group. The decrease in GLS in the trastuzumab group was not significant (p = 0.169). T1 and T2 relaxation times tended to increase, but this was not significant at subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac MRI scans showed frequent signs of subclinical cardiotoxicity after short-term anti-HER2 therapy and nonanthracycline-based chemotherapy; the effect was slightly stronger in patients treated with dual therapy. KEY POINTS: • A frequent subclinical cardiotoxicity was detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after short-term anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. • The change in myocardial strain was more marked in patients treated with dual (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab) than with trastuzumab only anti-HER2 therapy. • Cardiotoxicity surveillance through MRI is an interesting option particularly in patients treated with dual anti-HER2 therapy.

Signal Detection of Adverse Events Associated with Trastuzumab in a Cohort of Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer.

AIM: Utilization of signal detection methods in longitudinal claims data can improve post-marketing drug surveillance, but to date there has been limited application. The aim of this study is to use 3 approaches, the proportional reporting ratio, Gamma Poisson Shrinker, and tree-based scan statistic in detecting adverse drug events (ADEs) attributed to trastuzumab using an administrative claims dataset. METHODS: Using data from the Texas Cancer Registry and SEER linked to Medicare from 2010 to 2013, we conducted 1:2 propensity score matching. Breast cancer HER2+ patients treated with trastuzumab in addition to standard chemotherapy were matched to HER2- patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Inpatient and outpatient encounters up to 6 months from start of therapy were used to identify adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 4191 patients were included in the study. Across all methods, use of trastuzumab generated signals on 9 distinct body systems. Cardiomyopathy and heart valve disease were the most consistently detected signals. Clinical review determined that most signals represented known ADEs. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that claims data can be used to complement current ADE monitoring using common data mining methods with propensity score matching. Our analysis identified all expected ADEs associated with trastuzumab, and additional signals of valvular heart disorders.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

IMPORTANCE: The initial assessment of pertuzumab use for treatment of metastatic breast cancer by health technology assessment agencies suggested that pertuzumab was not cost-effective. In Ontario, Canada, pertuzumab became funded in November 2013 based on the substantial clinical benefit. To date, there is a paucity of analysis of pertuzumab using real-world data for cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy vs trastuzumab and chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based retrospective economic evaluation was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Patients who received first-line treatments for metastatic breast cancer from January 1, 2008, to March 31, 2018, were identified. Patients were followed up from the start of treatment up to 5 years, with maximum follow-up to March 31, 2019. Patients were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry and linked to the New Drug Funding Program database to identify receipt of first-line treatment (N = 1158). INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy after public funding (November 25, 2013) compared with treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy before funding. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cost-effectiveness, from a public payer perspective, was estimated from administrative data with a 5-year time horizon, adjusted for censoring, and discounted (1.5%). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for life-years gained and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with bootstrapped 95% CIs were calculated. Sensitivity analysis with price reduction of pertuzumab alone or in combination with trastuzumab was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 579 pairs of matched patients receiving pertuzumab and controls were included. The mean (SD) age of the matched study cohort was 58 (12.97) years; 1151 were women (99.4%). Pertuzumab resulted in 0.61 life-years gained and 0.44 QALYs gained at an incremental cost of $192 139 (all costs measured in Canadian dollar values, CAD) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $316 203 per life-year gained and $436 679 per QALY. The main factors associated with cost included the cost of pertuzumab (60%), outpatient cancer treatment delivery (24%), and trastuzumab (15%). With 100% price reduction of pertuzumab, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $174 027 per QALY. When the price of pertuzumab and trastuzumab were both reduced by more than 71%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreased below $100 000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this population-based study suggest that pertuzumab may increase survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer but would not be considered cost-effective, even after 100% price reduction, under conventional thresholds.

Lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con expresión HER-2 que progresaron a una primera línea con trastuzumab y quimioterapia / Lapatinib associated with chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer with HER-2 expression that progressed to a first line with trastuzumab and chemotherapy

ANTECEDENTES: Como parte de las funciones de UFETS: "Evaluar las tecnologías sanitarias ya existentes en la entidad, y proponer estrategias para su uso eficiente y/o reposición", se ha elaborado el presente informe sobre el uso de Lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia más allá de la 1era línea de tratamiento con trastuzumab asociado a quimioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico con HER-2 sobre expresado o amplificado. ESTRATEGIA DE BÚSQUEDA DE INFORMACIÓN: a) ¿En los pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama avanzado con expresión HER2 que progresaron a una primera línea de tratamiento con trastuzumab y quimioterapia, cuál es la eficacia y seguridad de lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia? b) Recolección de Manuscritos a Revisar: La estrategia de búsqueda sistemática de información científica para el desarrollo del presente informe se realizó siguiendo las recomendaciones de la Pirámide jerárquica de la evidencia propuesta por Haynes y se consideró los siguientes estudios: Sumarios y guías de práctica clínica. Revisiones sistemáticas y/o meta-análisis. Ensayos Controlados Aleatorizados (ECA). Estudios Observacionales (cohortes, caso y control, descriptivos). INFORMACIÓN QUE SOPORTE LA RELEVANCIA PARA LA SALUD PÚBLICA: Según el reporte de Globocan, el cáncer de mama es la neoplasia más frecuentemente diagnosticada durante el 2020 a nivel mundial. En nuestro país, los registros publicados por el INEN sobre los casos nuevos diagnosticados en ambos sexos, durante el periodo 2009-2018, registran al cáncer de mama como la segunda neoplasia más frecuentemente diagnosticada, con 1373 casos nuevos durante el 2018. Según Globocan, el cáncer de mama es la segunda neoplasia más frecuentemente diagnosticada durante el 2020, representando el 9.6% del total de diagnósticos nuevos realizados. Durante la última década, diversos estudios han evaluado agentes que potencialmente puedan impactar positivamente en la evolución de las pacientes con cáncer de mama. El HER-2 es una proteína transmembrana celular, cuya activación desencadena una cascada molecular promoviendo la disminución de la apoptosis, aumento de la proliferación celular, angiogénesis y desarrollo del microambiente tumoral.4 El conocimiento de la vía del HER-2 en el desarrollo del cáncer de mama llevo al desarrollo de agentes que bloqueen esta proteína. Uno de los primeros agentes desarrollados fue el trastuzumab. El trastuzumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea la proteína HER-2, su eficacia y seguridad han sido evaluados en primera línea de tratamiento en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con sobreexpresión o amplificación del HER-2, mejorando la sobrevida global (SG) y la sobrevida libe de progresión (SLP). Actualmente, nuevos regímenes de terapia han sido estudiados. El estudio CLEOPATRA evaluó la combinación de quimioterapia, trastuzumab y pertuzumab en primera línea del cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. Pertuzumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado que se une al dominio extracelular II de HER2. Su mecanismo de acción es complementario al de trastuzumab, inhibiendo la dimerización HER2-HER3 dependiente de ligando y reduciendo la señalización a través de vías intracelulares como PI3K/AKT. Hoy en día, la asociación quimioterapia, trastuzumab y pertuzumab son la combinación de elección en primera línea de tratamiento en esta población de pacientes en la práctica clínica diária. El impacto positivo del bloqueo del HER-2 llevo al estudio de nuevos agentes de tratamiento que continúen con el bloqueo del receptor en segunda línea de manejo. Lapatinib es un inhibidor dual de la tirosina quinasa (ITK) que se dirige tanto a EGFR como a HER2, inhibe el crecimiento de células de cáncer de mama que sobreexpresan HER2 en cultivo y en xenoinjertos tumorales. Los estudios in vitro demostraron que lapatinib inhibe la activación de las tres vías de señalización descendentes MAPK, PI3KAKT y PLCg; a través de la disminución de la fosforilación de los receptores diana y las proteínas Raf, ERK, AKT y PLCγ1. El objetivo de esta evaluación sanitaria es determina la seguridad y eficacia de lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con HER-2 luego de la progresión a una primera línea con trastuzumab asociada a quimioterapia. DISCUSIÓN: El cáncer de mama es una de las neoplasias más frecuentemente diagnosticadas en nuestro país. Diversos estudios han evaluado agentes que potencialmente puedan impactar positivamente en la evolución de las pacientes con cáncer de mama. Lapatinib es un inhibidor dual de la tirosina quinasa (ITK) que se dirige tanto a EGFR como a HER2, inhibiendo el crecimiento de células de cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. FDA y EMA aprobaron el empleo de lapatinib en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con HER-2 positivos y en la actualidad, las guías de práctica clínica nacionales e internacionales (ASCO, ESMO, NICE) sugieren el uso de lapatinib como parte del arsenal terapéutico en pacientes seleccionados con cáncer de mama avanzado con HER-2 positivo. Nuestra búsqueda sistemática realizada en pubmed encontró 535 artículos, de los cuales se identificaron 3 estudios de interés. Amir publico una revisión sistemática/metaanálisis donde reporto que el añadir lapatinib al tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de mama HER-2 positivo mejoro significativamente la SLP (HR 0.69) y la SG (HR 0.76, IC 95%, 0.60-0.96, p<0.02). Lapatinib se asoció a un incremento del 64% del OR de desarrollar un evento adverso severo (p = 0.003). Los eventos adversos más frecuentes registrados fueron diarrea, rash, artralgia y fatiga. Los estudios incluidos tuvieron un diseño similar y evaluaron los mismos objetivos. Los modelos de efectos randomizados y los análisis de sensibilidad limitaron que la heterogeneidad de las poblaciones incluidas afecte sustancialmente los resultados. Madden publico una revisión sistemática demostrando que la combinación lapatinib-capecitabina extendió la SG (37.6-108.7 semanas) y la SLP (21.1-30 semanas) en las pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzada HER-2 positivo que progresaron a una primera línea con trastuzumab-quimioterapia. La combinación lapatinib-capecitabina fue relativamente bien tolerada, presentando efectos secundarios, por lo general, de bajo grado: eritrodisestesia palmar-plantar, diarrea, erupción cutánea, anorexia y fatiga. La combinación lapatinib-capecitabina fue comparada con lapatinib-vinorelbine en un estudio fase II incluido. La mSG obtenida por lapatinib-capecitabina fue superior (105 semanas vs 84 semanas). La mSLP y la toxicidad obtenida fueron similares en ambos brazos. Esta última revisión presento limitaciones. El diseño metodológico y los sesgos presentados por los estudios incluido dentro de la revisión sistemática le dieron un nivel de calidad bajo para cada ensayo clínico. A pesar de las limitaciones descritas, la combinación lapatinib-capecitabina es un régimen eficaz y seguro en las pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. CONCLUSIONES: El cáncer de mama es una de las neoplasias más frecuentes diagnosticadas en nuestro país. El bloqueo del HER-2 impacta positivamente en la sobrevida de los pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. Lapatinib-capecitabina mejora significativamente la SLP y la SG en los pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo que han progresado a una primera línea de terapia con trastuzumab-quimioterapia. Lapatinib-capecitabina es segura en los pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo que han progresado a una primera línea de terapia con trastuzumab-quimioterapia. Lapatinib-vinorelbina es segura y eficaz en el tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico HER-2 positivo previamente tratadas, aunque la evidencia de su uso es más limitada o la evidencia sugiere que es menos efectivo que la combinación lapatinib-capecitabina, puede ser una opción de terapia en pacientes selecionados.

[Costs of intravenous vs. subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab in peruvian patients with HER2-positive breast cancer - An observational analysis of direct and indirect costs]. / Costos de la administración intravenosa vs. subcutánea del trastuzumab en pacientes peruanas con cáncer de mama HER2 positivo. Un análisis observacional de los costos directos e indirectos.

ANTECEDENT AND OBJECTIVE: In Peru, the presentation of TZM-IV and TZM-SC is carried out. But there is no comparative cost data by route of administration. The objective of our study was to know the costs of patients with breast cancer, comparing the routes of administration in a regional cancer center in Peru. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2020, patients who were prescribed TZM treatment were prospectively recorded clinical, demographic and transport data, and medical costs were obtained from medical history and pharmacy records. With these data, the simulation was performed in 100 patients who received 18 cycles of the drug. RESULTS: The main contributor to the cost of the difference was the cost of the drug itself, being S/. 4,711.11 (1,323.35 USD) and S/. 4,680.30 (1,314.69 USD) for TZM-IV and TZM-SC, respectively. The administration costs to treat 100 patients with complete cycles of TZM-IV and TZM-SC were S/. 334,488.53 (93,957.45 USD) and S/.207,455.33 (58,873.97 USD), respectively. Indirect costs indicate that patients lost in total, S/. 1,123.28 (315.53 USD) and S/. 1,148.60 (322.64 USD) in TZM-IV and TZMSC per patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TZM-SC is recommended, in the scenario of a lower cost of the drug and a shorter duration of administration time. Especially in a country with low funding, which only allows subsidizing the direct costs of cancer treatment.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) for the Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Residual Invasive HER2+ Early Breast Cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was recently approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (eBC) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based treatment. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare T-DM1 versus trastuzumab in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov cohort-based model tracked clinical and economic outcomes over a lifetime horizon from a US payer perspective. The model included 6 health states: invasive disease-free, nonmetastatic (locoregional) recurrence, remission, first-line and second-line metastatic BC and death. Model state transitions were based on statistical extrapolation of the head-to-head KATHERINE study and published sources. Dosing and treatment duration reflected prescribing information and trials. Costs (2019 US dollars) associated with pharmaceutical treatment (wholesale acquisition costs), health state specific care, adverse events, and end-of-life care were included. Health state utilities were obtained from KATHERINE and published literature. RESULTS: T-DM1 dominated trastuzumab, yielding lower lifetime costs (-$40,271), and higher life-years (2.980) and quality-adjusted life-years (2.336). Results were driven by patients receiving T-DM1 spending less time in more costly downstream health states, as these patients are less likely to experience a recurrence overall, despite having a higher likelihood of metastatic disease (distant recurrence) in the subset of patients who experience recurrence. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated robust results, with 96.7% of 5000 stochastic simulations producing dominance for T-DM1. The most influential variables were related to treatment costs, off treatment utilities, and health state costs. Additional scenario analyses tested a range of model inputs and assumptions, and produced consistent results. CONCLUSION: Relative to trastuzumab, T-DM1 treatment for patients with HER2+ eBC who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based treatment is likely to reduce the overall financial burden of cancer, while simultaneously improving patient outcomes.

Cardiac assessment in Australian patients receiving (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Cardiac function assessment is important for detecting and managing trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. Our study estimates rates and predictors of cardiac assessment among patients receiving trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+EBC) in Australia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Australians initiating (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2+EBC between 1 January 2015 and 15 April 2019. We used administrative claims to determine the number of patients receiving guideline-recommended assessment, i.e. evidence of baseline cardiac assessment (between 120 days before and 30 days after trastuzumab initiation) and regular on-treatment cardiac assessments (at least every 120 days). We examined factors associated with baseline and regular on-treatment cardiac assessment. RESULTS: Our study includes 5621 patients (median age 56 years), of whom 4984 (88.7%) had a baseline cardiac function test. Among 4280 patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, 2702 (63.1%) had guideline-recommended cardiac assessment. Rates of guideline-recommended assessment increased with later year of diagnosis (60.9% in 2015 vs 68.3% in 2018, OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.69). Patients with higher baseline comorbidities and greater socioeconomic disadvantage were less likely to have guideline-recommended cardiac assessment. Cardiac assessment practices varied by State/Territory. There was no association between baseline cardiac risk or anthracycline use and the likelihood of receiving guideline-recommended cardiac assessment. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients receiving (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab had guideline-recommended baseline and on-treatment cardiac assessment. Variations in cardiac assessment predominantly related to system-level factors, such as year of diagnosis and geography, rather than individual patient factors.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cardiotoxicity Among Women With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer and cardiovascular-specific mortality are higher among blacks compared with whites, but disparities in cancer therapy-related adverse cardiovascular outcomes have not been well studied. We assessed for the contribution of race and socioeconomic status on cardiotoxicity among women with HER2-positive breast cancer. This retrospective cohort analysis studied women diagnosed with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer from 2004-2013. All underwent left ventricular ejection fraction assessment at baseline and at least one follow-up after beginning trastuzumab. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between race and socioeconomic status (SES) on cardiotoxicity, defined by clinical heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) or asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decline (absolute decrease ≥ 10% to < 53%, or ≥ 16%). Blacks had the highest prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and increased BMI. Neighborhood-level SES measures including household income and educational attainment were lower for blacks compared with whites and others. The unadjusted cardiotoxicity risk was significantly higher in black compared with white women (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.10). In a multivariable analysis, this disparity persisted after controlling for relevant cardiovascular risk factors (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.84). Additional models adjusting for SES factors of income, educational attainment, and insurance status did not significantly alter the association between race and cardiotoxicity. In conclusion, black women are at increased risk of cardiotoxicity during HER2-targeted breast cancer therapy. Future etiologic analyses, particularly studies exploring biologic or genetic mechanisms, are needed to further elucidate and reduce racial disparities in cardiotoxicity.

Long-term follow-up assessment of cardiac safety in SAFE-HEaRt, a clinical trial evaluating the use of HER2-targeted therapies in patients with breast cancer and compromised heart function.

PURPOSE: HER2-targeted therapies are associated with cardiotoxicity which is usually asymptomatic and reversible. We report the updated cardiac safety assessment of patients with compromised heart function receiving HER2-targeted therapy for breast cancer, enrolled in the SAFE-HEaRt trial, at a median follow-up of 3.5 years. METHODS: Thirty patients with stage I-IV HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab, or ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), with asymptomatic LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) 40-49%, were started on cardioprotective medications, with the primary endpoint being completion of HER2-targeted therapy without cardiac events (CE) or protocol-defined asymptomatic worsening of LVEF. IRB-approved follow-up assessment included 23 patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up as of June 2020 is 42 months. The study met its primary endpoint with 27 patients (90%) completing their HER2-targeted therapies without cardiac issues. Of the 23 evaluable patients at long-term f/u, 14 had early stage breast cancer, and 9 had metastatic disease, 8 of whom remained on HER2-targeted therapies. One patient developed symptomatic heart failure with no change in LVEF. There were no cardiac deaths. The mean LVEF improved to 52.1% from 44.9% at study baseline, including patients who remained on HER2-targeted therapy, and those who received prior anthracyclines. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of the SAFE-HEaRt study continues to provide safety data of HER2-targeted therapy use in patients with compromised heart function. The late development of cardiac dysfunction is uncommon and continued multi-disciplinary oncologic and cardiac care of patients is vital for improved patient outcomes.

[Assessment of Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Trastuzumab Biosimilar in Gastric Cancer].

The postmarketing assessment of biosimilars is important because posttranslational modification by glycosylation is altered by the manufacturing process. A retrospective study of 15 patients with gastric cancer receiving a combination anticancer therapy with trastuzumab was performed. The most common concurrent regimen was the S-1 and oxaliplatin combination; efficacy and adverse events were assessed in this group. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival between patients receiving the reference formulation and patients receiving its biosimilar. The adverse events detected were similar in both groups. In the 6 patients who switched from the reference trastuzumab to its biosimilar, adverse events did not differ before and after the switch. This small-scale retrospective study found no differences in efficacy or adverse events between the reference trastuzumab and its biosimilar.

Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Response and Nutritional Markers in Patients With Trastuzumab-treated Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer.

AIM: To determine whether markers of systemic inflammatory response and nutrition are a predictor of treatment response in patients with trastuzumab-treated unresectable advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients who received chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer at Kochi Medical School from 2013 to 2020 were enrolled. Clinicopathological information and systemic inflammatory response data were obtained retrospectively to investigate associations between baseline cancer-related prognostic variables and survival outcomes. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 24.5 (range=1.9-88.4) months and 7.0 (range=2.0-23.4) months, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 52.4% and 81.0%, respectively. The median PFS for patients with a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <2.8 was significantly longer than that for those with NLR ≥2.8 (8.9 vs. 6.0 months; p=0.048). Although the median OS also tended to be longer for patients with NLR <2.8, the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in median OS and PFS were observed between patients with a prognostic nutrition index (PNI) <41.6 and those with PNI ≥41.6. CONCLUSION: An NLR ≥2.8 is a predictor of poorer prognosis in patients receiving systemic treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

Six versus 12 months' adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: the PERSEPHONE non-inferiority RCT.

BACKGROUND: The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for people with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months' trastuzumab, tested in registration trials, was adopted as standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently, similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks of trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether or not 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months' in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary end point of 4-year disease-free survival. DESIGN: This was a Phase III randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The setting was 152 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who it was planned would receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab took part. INTERVENTION: Randomisation (1 : 1) to 6 months' or 12 months' trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were overall survival, cost-effectiveness and cardiac function during treatment with trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 80% with 12 months' trastuzumab, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab (5% one-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using a within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model. RESULTS: Between 4 October 2007 and 31 July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12 months' trastuzumab and 2043 were randomised to 6 months' trastuzumab. Sixty-nine per cent of patients had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% received trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; and 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years' median follow-up, with 389 (10%) deaths and 566 (14%) disease-free survival events, the 4-year disease-free survival rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 88.1% to 90.8%) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% confidence interval 88.9% to 91.5%) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1.10, 90% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.26; non-inferiority p = 0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for overall survival (non-inferiority p = 0.0003) and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab [non-inferiority p = 0.03 (disease-free-survival) and p = 0.006 (overall survival)]. Six months' trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade [365/1929 (19%) vs. 460/1935 (24%) for 12-month patients; p = 0.0003] or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity [61/1977 (3%) vs. 146/1941 (8%) for 12-month patients; p < 0.0001]. Health economic analysis showed that 6 months' trastuzumab resulted in significantly lower lifetime costs than and similar lifetime quality-adjusted life-years to 12 months' trastuzumab, and thus there is a high probability that 6 months' trastuzumab is cost-effective compared with 12 months' trastuzumab. Patient-reported experiences in the trial highlighted fatigue and aches and pains most frequently. LIMITATIONS: The type of chemotherapy and timing of trastuzumab changed during the recruitment phase of the study as standard practice altered. CONCLUSIONS: PERSEPHONE demonstrated that, in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months'. Six months' treatment resulted in significantly less cardiac toxicity and fewer severe adverse events. FUTURE WORK: Ongoing translational work investigates patient and tumour genetic determinants of toxicity, and trastuzumab efficacy. An individual patient data meta-analysis with PHARE and other trastuzumab duration trials is planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52968807, EudraCT 2006-007018-39 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712140. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

THE BACKGROUND: There are several different types of breast cancer and some are called 'HER2 positive'. These cancers can often be cured by treatment with chemotherapy and a drug called trastuzumab (also known as Herceptin®; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Although the first trials of trastuzumab used 12 months treatment, we did not know if less treatment could work as well. A small trial in Finland showed that giving trastuzumab for just 9 weeks was also effective. We know that trastuzumab can have some side effects, including heart problems, so it was important to see if we could reduce the length of treatment time, which is usually 12 months. WHAT DID WE DO?: We wanted to find out if we could treat patients safely with 6 months rather than 12 months of trastuzumab. We carried out a clinical trial called PERSEPHONE, in which over 4000 patients with this type of early breast cancer took part. Half of the patients were given 12 months of trastuzumab and half were given 6 months of trastuzumab. WHAT DID WE FIND?: We found that the two groups of patients had very similar benefit from treatment. At 4 years after diagnosis 90.3% of those who had received 12 months of trastuzumab were alive and free of any breast cancer recurrence, compared with 89.5% of those who had received 6 months. In other words, 125 patients would need to be treated with 12 months' trastuzumab rather than 6 months' trastuzumab for one more person to be alive and cancer-free 4 years from diagnosis. THE SIDE EFFECTS?: Severe side effects of trastuzumab were seen on at least one occasion in 24% of 12-month patients compared with 19% of 6-month patients. More patients receiving 12 months of trastuzumab had to stop trastuzumab early because of heart problems (8% of 12-month patients compared with 3% of 6-month patients). WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN?: We have shown that 6 months of trastuzumab has similar outcomes to 12 months in treating patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer but with fewer severe side effects, including heart problems, fewer visits to hospital for patients and significant cost savings for the NHS.

Cost-effectiveness of six months versus 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2 positive early breast cancer in Egypt.

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women in Egypt. Trastuzumab is administered with chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (HER2 + ve ABC) in the metastatic and adjuvant settings resulting in improved treatment outcomes, and long-term follow-up. Some studies have evaluated whether equivalent outcomes can be achieved with reduced treatment duration. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of 6-month versus 1-year trastuzumab treatments from payer perspective over a 10 year time horizon.Methods: A half-cycle corrected Markov model was developed with five mutually exclusive health states; patient with HER2 +ve ABC, disease-free survival (DFS), local or regional relapse, metastatic relapse, and death. A cycle length of 6 months was applied, direct medical costs including cost of treatments, day-care, surgery, health states and follow-up visits were collected, and indirect costs such as lost productivity were not estimated. The transition probabilities and utilities were extracted from published literature, and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.Results: Among the HER2 +ve ABC patient population in Egypt, the total QALYs of the 6-month trastuzumab were estimated to be 2.99 compared with 2.93 for the 1-year trastuzumab which resulted in a difference of 0.06 QALYs. The total costs were EGP 271,647 ($106,947) and EGP 381,248 ($150,097), respectively. These costs yielded an ICER of -109,600 EGP/QALY (-43,149 $/QALY) for the 6-month trastuzumab. The 6-month trastuzumab is a dominant strategy when compared to 1-year trastuzumab, resulting in improved effectiveness at a reduced cost. All analyses results confirmed the dominance of 6-month trastuzumab and our model robustness.Conclusions: This study concluded that 6-month trastuzumab is a cost-effective option when compared to 1-year trastuzumab in patients with HER2 +ve ABC in Egypt. Our findings provide health care decision makers with additional insights to best allocate available resources concurrently with the improvement of the Egyptian patient's outcomes.

Cost-minimization analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab administration in Chilean patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab (TZM) improves survival and the risk of recurrence among patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer (BC). TZM treatment can be given intravenously (IV-TZM) or subcutaneously (SC-TZM). Although both methods have similar efficacy and safety, they differ in dosage and administration. Previous studies of cost minimization determined that SC-TZM is associated with lower costs than IV-TZM; however, those studies did not include the costs associated with body weight-based dosage and the treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS/PATIENTS: We performed a model-based cost-minimization analysis. The analysis included direct and indirect medical costs associated with TZM preparation (adjusted by body weight) and administration and also costs due to severe ADRs and non-medical costs that occurred during the total treatment course (18 cycles). We performed a sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the results across various TZM costs and patient body weights. RESULTS: The overall cost (in USD) of IV-TZM treatment was $83,309.1 per patient compared with $77,067.7 per patient for SC-TZM. Thus, one year of SC-TZM treatment cost $6,241.4 less per patient than one year of IV-TZM treatment. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were mainly driven by the price of each TZM vial and body weight. CONCLUSION: SC-TZM is a cost-saving therapy for Chilean patients with early-stage HER2+ BC. Given their similar efficacy and safety, we suggest the use of SC formulations rather than IV formulations. The use of SC-TZM instead of IV-TZM may have a significant economic impact on public/private healthcare systems.

Incidence and Management of Diarrhea With Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The APHINITY (BIG 4-11) study showed that pertuzumab significantly improved the rates of invasive disease-free survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, operable breast cancer when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Because diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise treatment administration, we evaluated the incidence and management of diarrhea in the APHINITY study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The APHINITY trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 year of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab or placebo. The diarrhea incidence, severity (National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0), onset, and management were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4805 patients were randomized. Diarrhea of any grade was the most common adverse event and occurred in 71% of patients in the pertuzumab arm versus 45% in the placebo arm. Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10% and 4% in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively. The greatest incidence of diarrhea was reported during the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and taxane (61% vs. 34% of patients experienced an event with pertuzumab vs. placebo, respectively). A marked decrease was observed on chemotherapy cessation. Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used, and diarrhea rarely caused treatment dose modifications or discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Diarrhea was a common adverse event in the APHINITY study. Most episodes were low grade and were generally manageable with common antidiarrheal agents. The incidence of diarrhea was greater with the combination of a taxane and HER2-targeted treatment and decreased once chemotherapy was stopped.

Comprehensive Assessment of Changes in Left Ventricular Diastolic Function With Contemporary Breast Cancer Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study determined the effects of doxorubicin and/or trastuzumab on diastolic function and the relationship between diastolic function and systolic dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin and trastuzumab can result in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) declines. However, the effects of these therapies on diastolic function remain incompletely defined. METHODS: In a rigorously phenotyped, longitudinal cohort study of 362 breast cancer participants treated with doxorubicin, doxorubicin followed by trastuzumab, or trastuzumab alone, changes in diastolic function were evaluated using linear models estimated via generalized estimating equations. Associations between baseline and changes in diastolic function with LVEF and longitudinal strain were also determined using generalized estimating equations. The Kaplan-Meier estimator derived the proportion of participants who experienced incident diastolic dysfunction. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the associations between participant characteristics and diastolic dysfunction risk, and between diastolic function and cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction risk, defined by an LVEF decline of ≥10% to <50%. RESULTS: Over a median of 2.1 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.3 to 4.2 years), participants treated with doxorubicin or doxorubicin followed by trastuzumab demonstrated a persistent worsening in diastolic function, with reductions in the E/A ratio, lateral and septal e' velocities, and increases in E/e' (p < 0.01). These changes were not observed with trastuzumab alone. Incident abnormal diastolic function grade occurred in 60% at 1 year, 70% by 2 years, and 80% by 3 years. Abnormal diastolic function grade was associated with a subsequent decrease in LVEF (-2.1%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: -3.1 to -1.2; p < 0.001) and worsening in longitudinal strain (0.6%; 95% CI: 0.1 to 1.1; p = 0.013) over time. Changes in E/e' ratio were modestly associated with worsening longitudinal strain (0.1%; 95% CI: 0.0 to 0.2; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: A modest, persistent worsening of diastolic function is observed with contemporary breast cancer therapy. Abnormal and worsening diastolic dysfunction is associated with a small risk of subsequent systolic dysfunction. (Cardiotoxicity of Cancer Therapy [CCT]; NCT01173341).

6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant trastuzumab significantly improves outcomes for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The standard treatment duration is 12 months but shorter treatment could provide similar efficacy while reducing toxicities and cost. We aimed to investigate whether 6-month adjuvant trastuzumab treatment is non-inferior to the standard 12-month treatment regarding disease-free survival. METHODS: This study is an open-label, randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Patients were recruited from 152 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, aged 18 years or older, and with a clear indication for chemotherapy, by a computerised minimisation process (1:1), to receive either 6-month or 12-month trastuzumab delivered every 3 weeks intravenously (loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by maintenance doses of 6 mg/kg) or subcutaneously (600 mg), given in combination with chemotherapy (concurrently or sequentially). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat, with a non-inferiority margin of 3% for 4-year disease-free survival. Safety was analysed in all patients who received trastuzumab. This trial is registered with EudraCT (number 2006-007018-39), ISRCTN (number 52968807), and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00712140). FINDINGS: Between Oct 4, 2007, and July 31, 2015, 2045 patients were assigned to 12-month trastuzumab treatment and 2044 to 6-month treatment (one patient was excluded because they were double randomised). Median follow-up was 5·4 years (IQR 3·6-6·7) for both treatment groups, during which a disease-free survival event occurred in 265 (13%) of 2043 patients in the 6-month group and 247 (12%) of 2045 patients in the 12-month group. 4-year disease-free survival was 89·4% (95% CI 87·9-90·7) in the 6-month group and 89·8% (88·3-91·1) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1·07 [90% CI 0·93-1·24], non-inferiority p=0·011), showing non-inferiority of the 6-month treatment. 6-month trastuzumab treatment resulted in fewer patients reporting severe adverse events (373 [19%] of 1939 patients vs 459 [24%] of 1894 patients, p=0·0002) or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity (61 [3%] of 1939 patients vs 146 [8%] of 1894 patients, p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: We have shown that 6-month trastuzumab treatment is non-inferior to 12-month treatment in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, with less cardiotoxicity and fewer severe adverse events. These results support consideration of reduced duration trastuzumab for women at similar risk of recurrence as to those included in the trial. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Assessment of left ventricular function by CMR versus MUGA scans in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab: a prospective observational study.

Little is known about the comparison of multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for serial monitoring of HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab. The association of cardiac biomarkers with CMR left ventricular (LV) function and volume is also not well studied. Our objectives were to compare CMR and MUGA for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment, and to examine the association between changes in brain natriuretic peptide (NT-BNP) and troponin-I and changes in CMR LV function and volume. This prospective longitudinal two-centre cohort study recruited HER2+ breast cancer patients between January 2010 and December 2013. MUGA, CMR, NT-BNP and troponin-I were performed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months after trastuzumab initiation. In total, 41 patients (age 51.7 ± 10.8 years) were enrolled. LVEF comparison between MUGA and CMR demonstrated weak agreement (Lin's correlation coefficient r = 0.46, baseline; r = 0.29, 6 months; r = 0.42, 12 months; r = 0.39, 18 months; all p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wide LVEF agreement limits (pooled agreement limits 3.0 ± 6.2). Both modalities demonstrated significant LVEF decline at 6 and 12 months from baseline, concomitant with increased LV volumes on CMR. Changes in NT-BNP correlated with changes in LV diastolic volume at 12 and 18 months (p < 0.05), and LV systolic volume at 18 months (p < 0.05). Changes in troponin-I did not correlate with changes in LV function or volume at any timepoint. In conclusion, CMR and MUGA LVEF are not interchangeable, warranting selection and utility of one modality for serial monitoring. CMR is useful due to less radiation exposure and accuracy of LV volume measurements. Changes in NT-BNP correlated with changes in LV volumes.

Examining the cost-effectiveness of baseline left ventricular function assessment among breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus to guide which breast cancer patients require left ventricular function assessment (LVEF) prior to anthracycline therapy; the cost-effectiveness of screening this patient population has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Yale Nuclear Cardiology Database, including 702 patients with baseline equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) scan prior to anthracycline and/or trastuzumab therapy. We sought to examine associations between abnormal baseline LVEF and potential cardiac risk factors. Additionally, we designed a Markov model to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ERNA screening for women aged 55 with stage I-III breast cancer from a payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: An abnormal LVEF was observed in 2% (n = 14) of patients. There were no significant associations on multivariate analysis performed on self-reported risk factors. Our analysis showed LVEF screening is cost-effective with ICER of $45,473 per QALY gained. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/ QALY, LVEF screening had an 81.9% probability of being cost-effective. Under the same threshold, screening was cost-effective for non-anthracycline cardiotoxicity risk of RR ≤ 0.58, as compared to anthracycline regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Age, preexisting cardiac risk factors and coronary artery disease did not predict a baseline abnormal LVEF. While the prevalence of an abnormal baseline LVEF is low in patients with breast cancer, our results suggest that cardiac screening prior to anthracycline is cost-effective.