Economic Analysis of AbClo, a Novel Abdominal Fascia Closure Device, for Patients With an Open Abdomen Following Trauma or Acute Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Open Abdomen (OA) cases represent a significant surgical and resource challenge. AbClo is a novel non-invasive abdominal fascial closure device that engages lateral components of the abdominal wall muscles to support gradual approximation of the fascia and reduce the fascial gap. The study objective was to assess the economic implications of AbClo compared to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone on OA management. METHODS: We conducted a cost-minimization analysis using a decision tree comparing the use of the AbClo device to NPWT alone among patients with midline laparotomy for trauma or acute abdominal surgery who were ineligible for primary fascial closure. The time horizon was limited to the length of the inpatient hospital stay, and costs were considered from the perspective of the US Medicare payer. Clinical effectiveness data for AbClo was obtained from a randomized clinical trial. Cost data was obtained from the published literature. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. The primary outcome was incremental cost. RESULTS: The mean cumulative costs per patient were $76 582 for those treated with NPWT alone and $70,582 for those in the group treated with the AbClo device. Compared to NPWT alone, AbClo was associated with lower incremental costs of -$6012 (95% CI -$19 449 to +$1996). The probability that AbClo was cost-savings compared to NPWT alone was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AbClo is an economically attractive strategy for management of OA in in patients with midline laparotomy for trauma or acute abdominal surgery who were ineligible for primary fascial closure.

Evaluation of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Completeness of Children in the Clinical Setting.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the completeness of real-world Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) in children after blunt abdominal trauma by benchmarking against established expert guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, analyzing a random sample of FASTs from two urban pediatric emergency departments. Two experts reviewed and labeled all FASTs for completeness using a predefined guideline of 5 anatomic views and 30 landmarks. We compared frequencies of views and landmarks as medians with interquartile ranges. RESULTS: We analyzed 200 FASTs, consisting of 1636 video clips, performed by 31 clinicians representing 198 children with a median age of 10 years (IQR 5,14). Over half of FASTs (52%) had all 5 views. The right upper quadrant view was most commonly visualized (96.5%), and suprapubic sagittal was least (65%). None of the FASTs included all 30 landmarks, ranging from 0 to 28 and median of 19 (IQR 15,23). The least visualized landmark of the right and left upper quadrants was caudal liver edge (60%) and splenic tip (64%), respectively. In the pericardial view, it was left atrium (45%). In both transverse and sagittal pelvic views, retro-uterine space was least visualized in girls, 21 and 29% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, most FAST views and landmarks were visualized. However, the pelvic sagittal view was the least frequently visualized view, and caudal liver edge was the least visualized landmark. Future research should evaluate if variability in visualizing FAST views and landmarks correlates with inconsistencies in diagnostic test performance.

Bioanalytical evaluation of wound depth and musculoskeletal injuries: Synergizing focused assessment with sonography for trauma with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedic trauma care.

Orthopaedic trauma care frequently necessitates prompt and precise assessment of musculoskeletal injuries and wound depth. The potential for improved diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes exists with the integration of sophisticated imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST). The purpose of this research was to examine the benefits and drawbacks of this integrative method in the clinical environment. From June 2022 to September 2023, 250 patients who were admitted to Ningbo University Affiliated People's Hospital, participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Following the administration of FAST, CT and MRI were utilized to evaluate orthopaedic injuries and skin wounds in patients. Analyses of data centred on the precision of diagnoses, the influence of treatment decisions and patient outcomes. Aged and gendered differently, the study participants sustained the variety of injuries and superficial wounds that were predominantly the result of traffic accidents. The FAST assay exhibited sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 80% and 72% overall accuracy. MRI demonstrated the finest diagnostic performance (85% sensitivity, 95% specificity and 89% accuracy), whereas CT scans offered improved diagnostic efficacy (80% sensitivity, 90% specificity and 84% accuracy). Treatment decisions were substantially impacted by integration of these imaging modalities, resulting in modifications in 20%-35% of cases, depending on the specific modality employed. Specifically, MRI played a pivotal role in informing treatment approaches, influencing non-surgical as well as surgical procedures. This study substantiates the significant advantages of integrating FAST with CT and MRI in orthopaedic trauma care, particularly in the accurate assessment of wound depth. The synergistic use of these imaging techniques not only enhances diagnostic precision but also positively impacts treatment strategies and patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive diagnostic approach in trauma care settings.

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Exam: Image Acquisition.

Over the past twenty years, the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam has transformed the care of patients presenting with a combination of trauma (blunt or penetrating) and hypotension. In these hemodynamically unstable trauma patients, the FAST exam permits rapid and noninvasive screening for free pericardial or peritoneal fluid, the latter of which implicates intra-abdominal injury as a likely contributor to the hypotension and justifies emergent abdominal surgical exploration. Further, the abdominal portion of the FAST exam can also be used outside of the trauma setting to screen for free peritoneal fluid in patients who become hemodynamically unstable in any context, including after procedures that may inadvertently injure abdominal organs. These "non-trauma" situations of hemodynamic instability are often triaged by providers from specialties other than emergency medicine or trauma surgery who are not familiar with the FAST exam. Therefore, there is a need to promulgate knowledge about the FAST exam to all clinicians caring for critically ill patients. Toward this end, this article describes FAST exam image acquisition: patient positioning, transducer selection, image optimization, and exam limitations. Since the free fluid is likely to be found in specific anatomic locations that are unique for each canonical FAST exam view, this work centers on the unique image acquisition considerations for each window: subcostal, right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, and pelvis.

The role of clinical and sonographic assessments in pre-operative evaluation of patients with splenic injuries in a resource-limited economy.

Background: Splenic trauma has been recognized as the most common cause of preventable deaths amongst trauma patients. Due to paucity of modern diagnostic imaging facilities in our setting, determination of the error rates and role of the simple, available diagnostic approaches are worthwhile and relevant to the practice of general surgery. Objectives: The aim was to determine the role and diagnostic accuracy of clinical and sonographic assessments of splenic injuries. Methods: This was a prospective study of the value of pre-operative clinical and sonographic assessments of patients with splenic injuries in our setting. Results: A total of 111 patients with abdominal trauma were evaluated. Of these, splenic injuries were confirmed in 75 patients intra-operatively, mainly from blunt trauma. Of the 97 cases diagnosed by clinical method, 66(68.0%) were confirmed by intraoperative findings. Similarly, of 86 sonographic diagnoses of splenic injuries, 61 (70.9%) truly had splenic trauma. Sensitivity for sonographic and clinical assessments was 84.7% and 78.9% respectively. False positive and negative rates for clinical (27.3% versus 44.1%) and ultrasonographic (29.1% versus 40.0%) assessments were high. Conclusions: Majority of splenic injuries were due to blunt abdominal trauma. The two diagnostic methods showed high sensitivity, but performed poorly for other validity tests.

Abdominal biofidelity assessment of 5th percentile female ATD responses relative to recently developed belt and bar loading corridors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was the quantitative evaluation and comparison of the responses of the Hybrid III 5th percentile female (HIII-05F) and the 5th percentile female Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR-05F) anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) subjected to abdominal loading conditions. METHOD: The HIII-05F and THOR-05F were subjected to 3 different abdominal loading conditions: fixed-back belt pull (low compression), fixed-back belt pull (high compression), and free-back rigid bar impact at 6 m/s. The stroke of the impact was controlled to represent injurious and noninjurious loading conditions as observed in the experiments with postmortem human subjects (PMHS). Quantitative comparisons were made between the ATD abdominal force and compression responses and biofidelity corridors obtained from matched-pair PMHS tests under identical loading conditions, using the most recent version of the NHTSA Biofidelity Ranking System (BRS). RESULTS: The overall THOR-05F BRS scores across all tests (BRS score = 1.84) indicated good biofidelity. For the belt loading test conditions, the average BRS scores for both THOR-05F (BRS scores = 1.45 and 1.34) and HIII-05F (BRS scores = 1.42 and 1.01) showed good biofidelity. For the rigid bar loading condition, the THOR-05F (BRS score = 2.74) showed better biofidelity compared to HIII-05F (BRS score = 10.63), with the HIII-05F exhibiting poor performance in this condition. The average pressures recorded by the abdomen pressure twin sensors (APTS) in the current study ranged from 45 to 130 kPa, increasing proportionally with higher stroke and loading rate. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the THOR-05F BRS scores were better than the HIII-05F BRS scores, which suggests improved biofidelity of the THOR-05F abdomen. The abdominal insert in the HIII-05F did not provide enough room for compression, leading to higher stiffness and occupant motion as observed in the rigid bar tests. Because of practical challenges in measuring abdomen deflection in a soft ATD abdomen component, use of APTS in THOR-05F provides the ability to measure the restraint loading to the abdomen and assess the risk of abdominal injury. With good BRS scores observed in this study for THOR-05F, pressure and other measurements included in the THOR-05F may be used to develop abdominal injury risk functions in the future.

Treatment of Severe Blunt Splenic Injury Varies Across Race and Insurance Type of Pediatric Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of adult patients with blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) have been previously demonstrated. It is unknown if similar disparities exist in pediatric patients with BSIs. Management of BSIs can include operative management, but nonoperative management (NOM) is preferred. This study assesses the association of race and insurance status on use of NOM among pediatric (aged < 18 y) patients following BSI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were abstracted from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files for calendar years 2013-2017. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between race or insurance status and NOM while controlling for injury severity, age, and facility type. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion within 24 h and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: We analyzed 1436 pediatric BSI patients. Black, non-Hispanic patients were less likely (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-1.02, P = 0.043) to undergo NOM and stayed 0.6 d longer (P = 0.010) than White, non-Hispanic patients. Uninsured patients were less likely (odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.25-1.11, P = 0.080) to undergo NOM and publicly insured patients stayed 0.24 d (P = 0.048) longer than privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found disparities in use of NOM for Black patients and uninsured patients as well as differences in length of stay. These results extend the literature on racial and socioeconomic disparities in care of trauma patients to pediatric BSI patients. Addressing these disparities requires additional studies aimed at identifying the underlying causes.

Artificial intelligence evaluation of focused assessment with sonography in trauma.

BACKGROUND: The focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is a widely used imaging modality to identify the location of life-threatening hemorrhage in a hemodynamically unstable trauma patient. This study evaluates the role of artificial intelligence in interpretation of the FAST examination abdominal views, as it pertains to adequacy of the view and accuracy of fluid survey positivity. METHODS: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination images from 2015 to 2022, from trauma activations, were acquired from a quaternary care level 1 trauma center with more than 3,500 adult trauma evaluations, annually. Images pertaining to the right upper quadrant and left upper quadrant views were obtained and read by a surgeon or radiologist. Positivity was defined as fluid present in the hepatorenal or splenorenal fossa, while adequacy was defined by the presence of both the liver and kidney or the spleen and kidney for the right upper quadrant or left upper quadrant views, respectively. Four convolutional neural network architecture models (DenseNet121, InceptionV3, ResNet50, Vgg11bn) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 6,608 images, representing 109 cases were included for analysis within the "adequate" and "positive" data sets. The models relayed 88.7% accuracy, 83.3% sensitivity, and 93.6% specificity for the adequate test cohort, while the positive cohort conferred 98.0% accuracy, 89.6% sensitivity, and 100.0% specificity against similar models. Augmentation improved the accuracy and sensitivity of the positive models to 95.1% accurate and 94.0% sensitive. DenseNet121 demonstrated the best accuracy across tasks. CONCLUSION: Artificial intelligence can detect positivity and adequacy of FAST examinations with 94% and 97% accuracy, aiding in the standardization of care delivery with minimal expert clinician input. Artificial intelligence is a feasible modality to improve patient care imaging interpretation accuracy and should be pursued as a point-of-care clinical decision-making tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level III.

Is it time to re-think FAST? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound for initial assessment of abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination using conventional ultrasound has limited utility for detecting solid organ injury. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compares the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to conventional ultrasound when used as the initial assessment for abdominal trauma prior to computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: A systematic literature search of major databases was conducted of human studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound and CEUS occurring prior to CT imaging for abdominal trauma. The study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. The quality of studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool. Paired pooled sensitivity and specificity between conventional ultrasound and CEUS were compared using data extracted from the eligible studies. Diagnostic odds ratio, number needed to diagnose values, and likelihood ratios were also determined. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. More than half of the included studies demonstrated low risk of bias. Using McNemar's test to assess for paired binary observations, we found that CEUS had statistically higher sensitivity (0.933 vs. 0.559; two-tailed, P < 0.001) and specificity (0.995 vs. 0.979; two-tailed, P < 0.001) than conventional ultrasound in the setting of abdominal trauma, respectively. When divided into particular findings of clinical interest, CEUS had statistically higher sensitivity than conventional ultrasound in screening for active bleeding and injuries to all abdominal solid organs. CEUS also had superior diagnostic odds ratios, number needed to diagnose values, and likelihood ratios than conventional ultrasound. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic value of CEUS was higher than that of conventional ultrasound for differentiating traumatic abdominal injuries when used as the initial assessment in the emergency department.

Health economic assessment of negative pressure wound therapy use in the management of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment (SAWHI) in the out-of-hospital setting.

Development of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment (SAWHI) can greatly affect patient care. Complications from SAWHI include delayed healing, increased risk of infection, and fascial dehiscence resulting in increased patient care and associated costs. Treatment options include conventional wound treatment or negative pressure wound therapy, both of which can be used in the out-of-hospital setting. However, limited published evidence on cost-effectiveness exists. A conservative health economic model was created to assess the cost-benefit of negative pressure wound therapy in the out-of-hospital setting for the management of SAWHI. Study data from a published multicentre randomised controlled trial were used and represented 221 patients that received care in the out-of-hospital setting. The mean per-patient total cost within 42 days was slightly higher in the negative pressure wound therapy group (2034.98 € versus 1918.91 €); however, when wound closure rates were considered, a cost savings of 4155.98 € per closed wound was observed with the use of negative pressure wound therapy (4324.34 € versus 8480.32 €). A cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed, and negative pressure wound therapy was observed to have a lower cost of care and a higher incremental closure rate.

Using Right-Sided Roll to Improve Reliability of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The Focused Assessment Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination is the standard of care for detecting hemoperitoneum in hypotensive blunt trauma patients. A pilot study demonstrated earlier identification of intra-abdominal fluid via FAST after right-sided roll (FASTeR) when compared with the standard FAST. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this phenomenon prospectively in hypotensive blunt trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-approved multicenter prospective trial was performed June 2016 to October 2020 at 8 designated trauma centers. Hypotensive adult blunt trauma patients were included. A traditional FAST examination was performed. After this, the secondary survey logroll for back examination was standardized to the patient's right side. A repeat supine right upper quadrant ultrasound view was obtained. The presence or absence of hemoperitoneum was confirmed by CT scan or intraoperative findings. FAST and FASTeR were compared using receiver operating characteristics. The area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 65 patients (35.7%) had hemoperitoneum on CT scan or intraoperative findings. The sensitivity of FASTeR was 47.7%, and of FAST was 40.0% (p = 0.019). The receiver operating characteristics area under the curve of the FASTeR examination was 0.717 vs 0.687 for the FAST examination (p = 0.091). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a right upper quadrant view after right-sided roll does improve the sensitivity of the FAST examination while maintaining the standard positive predictive value. We demonstrate a trend that does not reach statistical significance about the overall accuracy. This multicenter prospective trial was underpowered to reveal a statistically significant difference in the overall accuracy as measured by the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve.

Forensic assessment of a life-threatening penetrating abdominal air gun injury.

Air guns are considered mostly harmless by the public opinion, but projectiles shot from common air guns can penetrate skin and thus able to cause severe, even life-threatening injury. The prevalence of air gun injuries is constantly high, but severe injuries occur rarely. Forensic evaluation of air gun injuries can be challenging since the shot wound characteristics produced by combustion in case of firearm injuries are missing. Despite these difficulties, the topic of air gun injuries is mostly overlooked in forensic literature, and there are no guidelines available which can help the assessment of specific cases. A case of an air gun injury is reported, where the projectile penetrated the abdominal wall and created multiple bowel injury. The complex assessment of all available information (macroscopic and microscopic appearance of entrance wound, types of injuries, CT findings, and crime scene reconstruction) helped to uncover the truth about the circumstances of the injury.

Atuação em urgência e emergência a partir da psicologia junguiana / The pratice in an emergency service based on jungian psychology / La práctica en la urgencia y emergencia desde la psicología junguiana

Este artigo é um relato de experiência cujo objetivo é refletir sobre a atuação de uma psicóloga no contexto da urgência e emergência no hospital a partir da psicologia jungiana. Utilizou-se como método o recurso da sistematização da experiência, que consiste em sua interpretação crítica, cujo foco é o ordenamento e a reconstrução das experiências para explicitar a lógica do processo vivido. Por meio da reflexão de situações clínicas foi possível proporcionar um lugar para a subjetividade diante do disruptivo e da objetividade institucional do hospital. Teoricamente, o texto descreve as experiências de atendimento hospitalar, espaço em que urge o inesperado e o desconhecido. Aposta-se no simbolismo como movimento da psique para lidar com aquilo que o sujeito ainda não pode nomear, significar, incluindo a vulnerabilidade, as perdas e a questão da morte e do luto, este entendido como a ruptura de um vínculo. Dessa forma, a psicologia analítica se volta para como a entrada no hospital e a fugacidade do contexto de urgência e emergência afetam a psique dos sujeitos atendidos e de que forma esse psiquismo reage às vivências disruptivas e inesperadas.(AU)

This work is an experience report whose objective is to reflect on the role of a psychologist in the context of urgency and emergency in the hospital from the perspective of Jungian psychology. The resource of systematization of the experience was used as method, which consists of a critical interpretation, whose focus is the ordering and reconstruction of experiences to explain the logic of the process experienced. With the reflection of clinical situations, it was possible to provide a place for subjectivity in the face of the disruptive and the institutional objectivity of the hospital. Theoretically, the text describes the experience of entry in a hospital, a place in which the unexpected and the unknown are faced. We believe on symbolism as a movement of the psyche to deal with what the patient cannot yet name or give a meaning, including vulnerability, losses, and the issue of death and grief, this last one understood as the rupture of a link. Thus, analytical psychology will focus on how the entry in a hospital and the fleetingness of the emergency context affect the psyche of the patients and how this psyche reacts to the disruptive and unexpected experiences.(AU)

Este reporte de experiencia pretende reflejar sobre el papel de una psicóloga en el contexto de urgencia y emergencia en el hospital desde la perspectiva de la psicología junguiana. El método utilizado fue el recurso de sistematización de la experiencia, que consiste en una interpretación crítica, cuyo enfoque es el ordenamiento y reconstrucción de experiencias para explicar la lógica del proceso vivido. A partir del reflejo de situaciones clínicas se logró dar lugar a la subjetividad frente a la objetividad institucional del hospital. Teóricamente se describen las vivencias en la atención hospitalaria, un espacio donde se encuentra lo inesperado y lo desconocido. Se considera el simbolismo como un movimiento de la psique para lidiar con lo que el sujeto aún no puede nombrar, incluidas la vulnerabilidad, las pérdidas y el tema de la muerte y el dolor, este último comprendido como un quiebre del vínculo. De esta manera, la psicología analítica se centrará en cómo la admisión al hospital y la fugacidad del contexto de emergencia afectan la psique de los sujetos atendidos y cómo esta psique reacciona a estas experiencias disruptivas e inesperadas.(AU)

How Informed Is Your Informed Consent: Evaluating Differences Between Resident and Attending Obtained Consents for Cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: There is considerable variability in surgeons' approach to write and obtain informed consent for surgery, particularly among resident trainees. We analyzed differences in procedures and complications described in documented surgical consents for cholecystectomy between residents and attendings. We hypothesized that attending consents would describe more comprehensive procedures and complications than those done by residents. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of 334 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. Charts were queried for demographics, surgical approach, whether the consent was completed electronically, and which provider completed the consent. Specifically, consents were evaluated for inclusion of possible conversion to open procedure, intraoperative cholangiogram, bile duct injury, injury to nearby structures, reoperation, bile leak, as well as if the consent matched the actual procedure performed. SETTING: This study was conducted at an accredited general surgery training program at an academic tertiary care center in the Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: This was a review of 334 patients who underwent cholecystectomy over a 1 year period. RESULTS: Of all documented consents analyzed, 153 (47%) specifically included possible intraoperative cholangiogram, 156 (47%) included bile duct injury, 76 (23%) included injury to nearby structures, 22 (7%) included reoperation, and 62 (19%) included bile leak. In comparing residents and attendings, residents were more likely to consent for bile duct injury (p = 0.002), possible intraoperative cholangiogram (p = 0.0007), injury to nearby structures (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p < 0.0001), and bile leak (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists between documentation between resident and attending cholecystectomy consents, with residents including more complications than attendings on their consent forms. These data suggest that experience alone does not predict content of written consents, particularly for common ambulatory procedures. Education regarding the purpose of informed consent and what should be included in one may lead to a reduction in variability between providers.

Reducing Phlebotomy, Length of Stay, Cost: Development of a Blunt Abdominal Trauma Pathway in a Level I, Pediatric Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVES: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is a leading cause of morbidity in children with higher hemodynamic stabilities when compared with adults. Pediatric patients with BAT can often be managed without surgical interventions; however, laboratory testing is often recommended. Yet, laboratory testing can be costly, and current literature has not identified appropriate pathways or specific tests necessary to detect intra-abdominal injury after BAT. Therefore, the present study evaluated a proposed laboratory testing pathway to determine if it safely reduced draws of complete blood counts, coagulation studies, urinalysis, comprehensive metabolic panels, amylase and lipase levels orders, emergency department (ED) length of stay, and cost in pediatric BAT patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of levels I, II, and III BAT pediatric patients (n = 329) was performed from 2015 to 2018 at our level I, pediatric trauma center. Patients were then grouped based on pre-post pathway, and differences were calculated using univariate analyses. RESULTS: After implementation of the pathway, there was a significant decrease in the number of complete blood counts, coagulation studies, urinalysis, comprehensive metabolic panels, amylase, and lipase levels orders ( P < 0.05). Postpathway patients had lower average ED lengths of stay and testing costs compared with the pre pathway patients ( P < 0.05). There was no increase in rates of return to the ED within 30 days, missed injuries, or readmissions of patients to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Results displayed that the adoption of a laboratory testing pathway for BAT patients reduced the number of laboratory tests, ED length of stay, and associated costs pediatric patients without impacting quality care.

Economic and clinical benefits of immediate total-body CT in the diagnostic approach to polytraumatized patients: a descriptive analysis through a literature review.

Major trauma is an event causing injuries that may determine an immediate or potential risk to the patient survival. A correct management of major trauma is decisive in reducing disability, which has relevance both from the point of view of the quality of life of the single individual and from the point of view of health expenditure. The primary clinical approach to the polytraumatized patients is managed, in most cases, as outlined in the guidelines of Advanced Trauma Life Support, proposing conventional radiological investigations, such as chest and pelvis x-ray, and of FAST (focused abdominal sonography in trauma)/E-FAST (extended FAST) examinations, followed by selective targeted computed tomography (CT). This approach is questionable and is increasingly common in clinical practice the adoption of the immediate total-body CT in the diagnostic approach to the hemodynamically stable polytraumatized patient. However, the potential advantages of such conduct both in terms of clinical benefits and in terms of cost-effectiveness still need to be discussed. The objective of this review article consists of a descriptive analysis of the economic and clinical benefits of the adoption of immediate total-body CT in polytrauma patients through a literature review.

Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) performance in paediatric conflict injury.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) in a paediatric population with a substantial proportion of penetrating abdominal injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FAST and computed tomography (CT) abdomen findings were compared for 98 children who presented to Camp Bastion during the war in Afghanistan in 2011. FAST performance was compared to the reference standard of free fluid detected on CT. Whether children presented alone or as part of a group was also ascertained from the radiology database. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients, 20 had free fluid on CT and 15 were FAST positive. Fourteen of the 98 (14%) had penetrating wounds to the abdominal cavity. For the whole cohort FAST sensitivity was 65% (41-85%) and specificity 97% (91-100%). For those with penetrating abdominal injury sensitivity was 64% (31-89%) and specificity was 100% (40-100%). In total, 45% arrived at the same time as another casualty, and 30% arrived with other injured children. CONCLUSION: FAST performance in this population was similar to that reported in the context of paediatric blunt trauma, with high specificity for intra-abdominal free fluid. This is the first time this has been demonstrated in a cohort containing children with penetrating abdominal trauma. A substantial proportion of children presented as part of a group, necessitating simultaneous triage of multiple injured patients. FAST has a role to play in conflict medicine and mass casualty scenarios where rapid access to CT may not be feasible.

Immune Function After Splenic Artery Embolization for Blunt Trauma: Long-Term Assessment of CD27+ IgM B-Cell Levels.

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) plays a critical role in the treatment of high-grade splenic injury not requiring emergent laparotomy. SAE preserves splenic tissue, and growing evidence demonstrates preserved short-term splenic immune function after SAE. However, long-term function is less studied. Patients who underwent SAE for blunt abdominal trauma over a 10-year period were contacted for long-term follow-up. Sixteen participants (sex: women, 10, and men, 6; age: median, 34 years, and range, 18-67 years) were followed up at a median of 7.7 years (range, 4.7-12.8 years) after embolization. Splenic lacerations were of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades III to V, and 14 procedures involved proximal embolization. All individuals had measurable levels of IgM memory B cells (median, 14.30 as %B cells), splenic tissue present on ultrasound (median, 122 mL), and no history of severe infection since SAE. In conclusion, this study quantitatively demonstrated that long-term immune function remains after SAE for blunt abdominal trauma based on the IgM memory B cell levels.

Epidemiology and management of abdominal injuries in children.

BACKGROUND: Although more guideline-adherent care has been described in pediatric compared to adult trauma centers, we aimed to provide a more detailed characterization of management and resource utilization of children with intra-abdominal injury (IAI) within pediatric centers. Our primary objective was to describe the epidemiology, diagnostic evaluation, and management of children with IAI across U.S. children's hospitals. Our secondary objective was to describe the interhospital variation in surgical management of children with IAI. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 33 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. We included children aged <18 years evaluated in the emergency department from 2010 to 2019 with IAI, as defined by ICD coding, and who underwent an abdominal computed tomography (CT). Our primary outcome was abdominal surgery. We categorized IAI by organ system and described resource utilization data. We used generalized linear regression to calculate adjusted hospital-level proportions of abdominal surgery, with a random effect for hospital. RESULTS: We studied 9265 children with IAI. Median (IQR) age was 9.0 (6.0-13.0) years. Abdominal surgery was performed in 16% (n = 1479) of children, with the lowest proportion of abdominal surgery observed in children aged <5 years. Liver (38.6%) and spleen (32.1%) were the most common organs injured. A total of 3.1% of children with liver injuries and 2.8% with splenic injuries underwent abdominal surgery. Although there was variation in rates of surgery across hospitals (p < 0.001), only three of 33 hospitals had rates that were statistically different from the aggregate mean of 16%. CONCLUSIONS: Most children with IAI are managed nonoperatively, and most children's hospitals manage children with IAI similarly. These data can be used to inform future benchmarking efforts across hospitals to assess concordance with guidelines for the management of children with IAI.