Objective Assessment of Lingual Nerve Microsurgical Reconstruction.

Lingual nerve (LN) injury is one of the most serious consequences of oral surgery. Prompt microsurgical reconstruction of the nerve can alleviate most of those symptoms leading to satisfactory functional recovery.Thirty-five patients with partial to complete LN injury underwent surgery in the period between January 2006 and May 2015. All patients underwent a preoperative clinical and neurological evaluation with the assessment of lingual tactile and pain sensory thresholds and masseteric inhibitory reflex.All patients underwent explorative surgery and direct microneurorrhaphy of distal and proximal stumps in case of complete lesion, while the removal of traumatic neuroma and the following microneurorrhaphy of distal and proximal stumps of the injured nerve was performed in case of incomplete lesion. Nerve grafting has always been avoided because of distal stump mobilization obtained by severing the submandibular branch of the LN.All patients but 1 exhibited good recovery of tongue sensation, never complete, both clinically and electrophysiologically: recovery of the excitability of masseteric inhibitory reflex suppression components SP1 and SP2 was observed, often with increased latencies but consistent with a functional recovery.All patients feeling pain preoperatively experienced complete relief of algic symptoms.The early microsurgical approach is the most suitable choice for the treatment of LN injuries.

Medicolegal Considerations Involving Iatrogenic Lingual Nerve Damage.

The aim of this review is to improve risk management strategies through analysis of the anatomic, semeiotic, and medicolegal aspects that characterize iatrogenic lingual nerve damage (LND) and its legal consequences in the case of legal proceedings for a claim for compensation. In dental practice, LND can be caused by local or general anesthesia or by mechanical, chemical, or thermal mechanisms. A certain postoperative identification of LND etiopathogenesis is often very challenging because it can be difficult to show at what time the damage occurred and which mechanism actually caused it. Clinical tests assessing lingual nerve sensory capabilities have a low sensitivity and moderate specificity, whereas instrumental tests have the advantage of not being affected by data interpretation subjectivity by both the operator and the patient. The quantification of permanent LND is not uniformly established, and there are no specific standard worldwide indications. From a medicolegal point of view, LND is a complication that may or may not be caused by surgical error. The 2 different concepts of "expectability" and avoidability or preventability allow one to discriminate between professional liability and fate and therefore to determine the surgeon's imputability in LND. Despite clinical competence and practice in performing the medical or surgical procedure, the clinician risks a lawsuit for negligence if he or she does not warn the patient about all relevant risks regardless of their frequency. Informed consent plays an essential role in minimizing litigation; the patient must be informed-with both his or her level of culture and ability to understand being taken into consideration-of the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic perspectives and their consequences, in addition to all other viable alternative therapies, as well as the risks of nontreatment.

Analysis of professional malpractice claims in implant dentistry in Italy from insurance company technical reports, 2006 to 2010.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyze the characteristics of implant dentistry claims in Italy based on insurance company technical reports for malpractice claims. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-one technical reports of cases of professional malpractice in implant dentistry between 2006 and 2010 were included in the study. Data included the sex and age of the patient and dentist, the kind of negligence claimed, and the damages awarded as a consequence of the alleged misconduct. RESULTS: Of the cases examined in this study, 9.9% went to court. The patients were female in 73.6% of the cases. Most of the technical errors were committed during implant insertion (82.6%). In 50.4% of cases, the technical error involved the surrounding structures, such as damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (32.2%) or the lingual nerve (2.5%), invasion of the maxillary sinus (9.1%), or pulpal dental necrosis in adjacent teeth (6.6%). Incomplete clinical documentation was apparent in 54.5% of cases. In 9.9% of cases, a civil suit had already been filed before a visit, and medicolegal advice from the insurance expert had been procured. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy between the total number of cases examined and those that went to court indicates that implant malpractice claims in Italy are most often settled out of court. The large number of intraoperative errors seen and the high proportion of injuries to surrounding structures suggest that implant dentists would benefit from further specific training. Also, clinical documentation vital to a defense against any claims relating to professional misconduct was incomplete or absent in more than half of the cases.

Assessment of lingual nerve injury using different surgical variables for mandibular third molar surgery: a clinical study.

The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of sensory impairment of the lingual nerves following lower third molar removal and to compare the outcome with various operative variables. A total of 1200 mandibular third molars were removed under local anaesthesia. Predictor variables were categorized as lingual flap retraction, tooth sectioning, and buccal guttering. The outcome variable was the presence or absence of lingual nerve impairment. Different operative techniques were performed to identify independent predictors. Of the 1200 patients, 67 (5.6%) experienced transient sensory impairment at the 1-week follow-up. In all cases this resolved completely during the study period, except for four (0.3%) patients who suffered permanent impairment of lingual nerve function. Factors that predicted lingual nerve injury were lingual flap retraction, tooth sectioning, and buccal guttering. The incidence of lingual nerve injury was greater when combinations of these operative variables were used.

Physical neurosensory testing versus current perception threshold assessment in trigeminal nerve injuries related to dental treatment: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a preliminary comparison of traditional clinical neurosensory examination (CNE) and current perception threshold (CPT). METHOD AND MATERIALS: This is a retrospective chart audit of patients with trigeminal nerve injuries related to dental treatment who were evaluated with both CNE and CPT assessments (electrical stimulus tests) after presenting with altered sensation involving either the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) or lingual nerve (LN) distributions. The tests were performed on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue for LN injuries and the lower lip and chin for IAN injuries. Results were defined as hyper-, hypo-, or normal sensory response. RESULTS: Twelve charts were reviewed; 10 of the 12 nerve injuries occurred secondary to mandibular third molar extraction affecting 7 LN and 5 IAN branches. Following LN injuries, the C, and A-delta fibers assessment demonstrated hyposensitivity in the affected nerve territory in CPT and the CNE tests with the exception of 1 normal nerve response in 5-Hz CPT. Within the LN injury group, good correlation was observed between the CNE and CPT tests with the exception of brush stroke and 250-Hz CPT stimuli. Following IAN injuries, sensory testing results were more varied. A-beta fiber evaluation demonstrated hyposensitivity to VF in all patients and in 4 of 5 for brush test. One patient was hypersensitive for the brush test. The response to 2,000-Hz electrical stimulus demonstrated hyposensitivity in 3 patients, hypersensitivity in 1 (the same patient that was hypersensitive for brush), and normal sensitivity in 1 patient. Good correlations were found only between the CPT 5-Hz and heat and cold tests. Only 1 patient (IAN injury) reported pain that was hypersensitive for heat, cold, pinprick, brush, and 250-Hz and 2,000-Hz stimuli. CONCLUSION: Following LN injuries, CNE and CPT tests provided similar findings. More disparity was observed between the CNE and CPT methods in the IAN injury evaluation. For LN injury assessments, CNE alone appears to be adequate for assessing nerve injuries.

[Sensory injury to the lingual nerve after nerve block at the lingula mandibulae]. / Dommages sensoriels du nerf lingual après anesthésie à l'épine de Spix.

Prolonged and possibly permanent change in sensation due to lingual nerve damage can occur after mandibular block anesthesia. The condition is rare and little can be done to prevent its occurrence. A case report is presented and functional as well as legal implications are discussed. Also practical recommendations are given to help the dentist when faced with the situation.

Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of conventional sensory assessment in monitoring lingual nerve recovery subsequent to third molar surgery and to evaluate if the assessment methods can be predictive of injury outcome. METHOD: A prospective case series of 94 patients presenting with lingual nerve injuries evaluated using objective mechanosensory and subjective methods during the recovery period of up to 12 months. RESULTS: The conventional tests were often unable to diagnose the presence of injury due to variability and they were not predictive of outcome. As a result of this study, we are able to identify patients more likely to have permanent rather than temporary lingual nerve injury at four to eight weeks post injury, using patient reported subjective function. The subjective function test also minimises the requirements for specialist training or equipment providing an ideal method for general dental practice. CONCLUSIONS: The development of these simple subjective tests may enable us to identify which patients are at risk of permanent lingual nerve injuries in the early post injury phase, thus allowing expeditious therapy when indicated.

A comparison of patient satisfaction and objective assessment of neurosensory function after trigeminal nerve repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare objective and subjective assessments of neurosensory function after trigeminal nerve repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a sample of patients who underwent surgical repair of trigeminal nerve injuries. The primary study variables were categorized as objective or subjective. The objective variable was the change in neurosensory examination between preoperative and 1-year postoperative visits. Neurosensory status was measured using an ordinal scale ranging from anesthetic (0) to normal (4). Subjective variables included patient satisfaction with the nerve repair and patient assessment of injury-related oral dysfunction. Demographic, anatomic, and operative variables were also collected. Appropriate univariate and bivariate statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 19 patients (14 female, 17 Caucasian) who had trigeminal nerve repair (17 lingual, 2 inferior alveolar). The mean duration between injury and repair was 4.5 +/- 2.3 months; between repair and postoperative assessment was 11.9 +/- 0.9 months. The mean change in neurosensory status was 1.3 +/- 1.0 levels. The majority of patients (63.1%) rated their satisfaction with the outcome of treatment as "good" to "excellent." There was a statistically significant correlation between change in neurosensory status and patient satisfaction (rho = 0.86; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There is evidence of a strong correlation between improvement in the neurosensory examination following trigeminal nerve repair and patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome 1-year postoperatively. Patients who experience greater neurosensory improvement also report lower frequencies of related oral dysfunction.

Long-term outcome assessment for lingual nerve microsurgery.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the clinical outcomes resulting from the microsurgical repair of lingual nerve injuries. The study was based on patient chart review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients referred to the principal investigator (V.B.Z.), with a diagnosis of lingual nerve injury who underwent trigeminal nerve microsurgery during a 3-year period (1999 to 2002), were entered in this study. All patients received a complete history and physical examination, and thorough preoperative and postoperative neurosensory testing to evaluate clinical response to hot, cold, cotton wisp, vibration, 2-point discrimination, directional stroke, and fine touch as determined by Von-Frey filaments. RESULTS: All patients underwent an external neurolysis procedure in combination with an internal neurolysis, neuroma excision, or primary neurorrhaphy under microscopic guidance depending on the intraoperative findings. The average time from injury to surgery was 8 months. The patients were followed for an average of 9 months after surgery, and assessment was based on the patients subjective experience as well as standardized neurosensory testing. Eighteen patients (90%) had some improvement in neurosensory function and 2 patients (10%) reported no improvement. One of the patients exhibiting no clinical improvement had a prolonged delay in seeking treatment, and the distal nerve could not be localized intraoperatively. Most patients were operated on between 2.5 and 7 months after injury, and there was no statistical difference in outcome as a function of the time from injury to repair in this group of patients. This subgroup of responding patients averaged at least 50% improvement in neurosensory function. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical repair of lingual nerves provides moderate to significant improvements in clinical sensory function and is a useful option in treating affected individuals, especially when implemented soon after injury.

Iatrogenic paresthesia in the third division of the trigeminal nerve: 12 years of clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic paresthesia in the third division of the trigeminal nerve remains a complex clinical problem with major medicolegal implications. However, most lawsuits can be prevented through better planning of procedures and by obtaining informed consent. The purpose of this article is to present the authors" clinical experience over the past 12 years, to review the principles of prevention and management of trigeminal paresthesia and to highlight the resulting medicolegal implications. METHODS: The files of all 165 patients referred to the oral and maxillofacial surgery department for evaluation of iatrogenic paresthesia in the third division of the trigeminal nerve were reviewed. The characteristics of the subgroup of patients who had taken an attending dentist to court were compared with those of the other patients. RESULTS: Surgical extraction of impacted molars was the main cause of paresthesia in 109 (66%) of the 165 subjects. The alveolar nerve was affected in 89 (54%) subjects, the lingual nerve in 67 (41%) subjects, and both nerves were affected in 9 (5%) subjects. There were more female than male patients (ratio 2.2:1). Lawsuits were initiated in 33 (20%) of the cases; patients who initiated lawsuits were younger, were more likely to have experienced anesthesia and were more likely to need microsurgery (all p < 0.001). Poor surgical planning and lack of informed consent were the most common errors on the part of the dentists. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate evaluation of surgical indications and risk, good surgical technique, preoperative informed consent and sufficient postoperative follow-up should help to reduce the frequency of neurosensory deficits after dental treatment and attendant lawsuits.

Litigation and the lingual nerve.

PURPOSE: A "malpractice crisis" exists in the United States. Litigation analysis helps to understand the causes and may be useful in prevention of suits. This study reviews litigation regarding the lingual nerve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Jury verdict reports were obtained from a computerized legal database for the years 1987 through 2000. The study reviews all state and federal civil trials in the United States. Reviews compile information on plaintiffs and defendants, allegations of wrong-doing, reasons for litigation, anatomic sites of injuries, specialties of expert witnesses, verdict results, and awards received. RESULTS: Thirty-three suits from 12 states were obtained. Dentists or oral surgeons were involved in 87%, and otolaryngologists were involved in 13% of suits. Tooth extractions were involved in 79%, and 50% of these resulted in financial awards. Lack of informed consent was alleged in 52% of suits overall and in 46% of tooth extraction suits. Expert witnesses were of the same specialty for both sides in 81%. Inadequate training and selection of the wrong surgical approach were alleged in 18% and 15%, respectively. Anatomic variations were thought to be present in 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons must be aware of anatomic variations and regions in which injury to the lingual nerve frequently occurs. Written informed consent may help decrease litigation in known risk regions.

Malpractice claims for permanent nerve injuries related to third molar removals.

On the basis of the register of the Finnish Patient Insurance Association, the aim of this study was to examine malpractice claims for nerve injuries associated with third molar removals and determine whether they are concentrated among specialists, among less experienced dentists, or in certain geographic areas. During 1987-93 there were 139 claims for permanent sensory or motor disturbances related to removal of lower third molars in Finland. The lingual nerve was injured in 54% and the inferior alveolar nerve in 41% of the claims. In 91% of the cases the injury occurred in relation to surgical removal of the tooth and in 6% in relation to simple extraction. The claims were distributed among 123 dentists, of whom 78% were dental surgeons, 15% specialists in oral and maxillofacial surgery, and 7% other specialists. These figures represented 2% of the dental surgeons and 26% of the oral surgeons in Finland (P< 0.01). More than half the claims were associated with dentists with less than 10 years' experience. Claims originated more often from the eastern and northern (rural) areas of Finland than from urban areas (3.8 claims versus 2.4 claims per 100,000 inhabitants, P < 0.05). Compensation was paid to the patients in two-thirds of the cases, indicating that the dentists authorized to decide claims very often considered these injuries avoidable. Therefore, proper diagnosis, treatment planning, surgical techniques, and detailed patient information must be emphasized. In cases where risks are obvious, referral to an oral surgeon is recommended.

Neurosensory disturbances of the trigeminal nerve: a long-term follow-up of traumatic injuries.

PURPOSE: This study assesses the physical and psychosocial consequences of trigeminal nerve damage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 33 questions, 30 of which had fixed alternatives, was mailed to 300 persons who had received compensation from a syndicate of several insurance companies (Konsortiet för Patientförsäkring) because of trigeminal nerve damage. One question with no alternative reply gave the respondents an opportunity to comment on their problems and to rate them on a visual analogue scale. The questionnaire was answered by 226 recipients, 72 men and 153 women. RESULTS: Most of the patients had sensory disturbances resulting from damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, the mental nerve, or the lingual nerve. More than 70% of the respondents complained about paresthesia. No fewer than one of five patients suffered from pain in the affected area. The altered sensation caused functional disturbances in speech and eating which, in turn, had social and psychological consequences. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that mainly women and older persons have the most severe discomfort after oral nerve damage.

Assessment of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve disturbances after dentoalveolar surgery, and of recovery of sensitivity.

In a follow-up of 1107 dentoalveolar operations in the postcanine region, 24 (2.2%) temporary sensitivity disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve and 16 (1.4%) of the lingual nerve were found. Permanent disturbances were not present. Complete recovery had occurred by 6 months in all cases. The incidence of temporary sensitivity disturbances depended on the different surgical interventions performed. For evaluation and follow-up purposes, a computer-aided pain and thermal sensitivity (PATH) tester was used. By PATH testing, spontaneous recovery can already be ascertained at the third or fourth postoperative month.

Specialist practice for minor oral surgery: a comparative audit of third molar surgery.

Cost efficiency of removing third molars in a practice specialising in minor oral surgery was compared to that of a hospital oral surgery department. A total of 100 patients treated in each locality were prospectively audited during the financial year 1989-90. Surgical complexity, waiting time, complications and patient satisfaction were compared. The hospital cases were costed individually and compared to fees received for the patients treated in the practice. The practice fees were also compared to average expenses as assessed by the Dental Rates Study Group Inland Revenue Enquiry. Patients were treated more promptly and at a lower cost in the specialist practice with no adverse effect on quality as assessed by complications and patient satisfaction. Surgical complexity was not a contraindication to practice treatment but some patients may be better treated in hospital because of medical or social circumstances. Patient charges for treatment carried out under General Dental Service regulations are a serious impediment to the viability of a specialist oral surgery practice.

A method of assessment in cases of lingual nerve injury.

A method for assessing lingual sensation is described, comprising sensory testing, using touch and moving two-point discrimination and patient subjective reporting. The clinical application is seen to be the evaluation of lingual nerve injury consequent upon lower third molar surgery. Using this method it is considered possible to identify many of those patients unlikely to make full spontaneous recovery at the stage of 3 months following injury, with a view to achieving an earlier timing of surgical repair than that which prevails at present.