Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model.

BACKGROUND: It is critical that junior residents be given opportunities to practise bowel anastomosis before performing the procedure in patients. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an affordable way to provide realistic, reusable intestinal simulators. The aim of this study was to test the face and content validity of a 3D-printed simulator for bowel anastomosis. METHODS: The bowel anastomosis simulator was designed and assembled with the use of desktop 3D printers and silicone solutions. The production cost ranges from $2.67 to $131, depending on which aspects of the model one prefers to include. We incorporated input from a general surgeon regarding design modifications to improve the realism of the model. Nine experts in general surgery (6 staff surgeons and 3 senior residents) were asked to perform an anastomosis with the model and then complete 2 surveys regarding face and content validity. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). RESULTS: The overall average score for product quality was 3.58, indicating good face validity. The average score for realism (e.g., flexibility and texture of the model) was 3.77. The simulator was rated as being useful for training, with an overall average score of 3.98. In general, the participants agreed that the simulator would be a valuable addition to current simulation-based medical education (average score 4.11). They commented that the model would be improved by adding extra layers to simulate mucosa. CONCLUSION: Experts found the 3D-printed bowel anastomosis simulator to be an appropriate tool for the education of surgical residents, based on the model's texture, appearance and ability to undergo an anastomosis. This model provides an affordable way for surgical residents to learn bowel anastomosis. Future research will focus on proving educational efficacy, effectiveness and transfer that can be adapted for laparoscopic anastomosis training, hand-sewing and stapling procedures.

Collaborative clinical simulation in cardiologic emergency scenarios for medical students. An exploratory study on model applicability and assessment instruments.

Aims: This paper evaluates the feasibility of piloting the collaborative clinical simulation (CCS) model and its assessment instruments applicability for measuring interpersonal, collaborative, and clinical competencies in cardiologic emergency scenarios for medical students. The CCS model is a structured learning model for the acquisition and assessment of clinical competencies through small groups working collaboratively to design and perform in simulated environments supported by technology. Methods: Fifty-five students were allocated in five sessions (one weekly session) conducted with the CCS model within the course Cardiovascular Diseases. The applied practice aimed at the diagnosis and treatment of tachyarrhythmias in a simulated emergency department. In addition to the theoretical classes four weeks before the simulation sessions, students were sent a study guide that summarized the Guide to the European Society of Cardiology. For each simulation session, one clinical simulation instructor, one cardiologist teacher, and the principal investigator participated. Students were divided into three groups (3-5 students) for each-session. They designed, performed, role-played, and debriefed three different diagnoses. Three instruments to assess each group's performance were applied: peer assessment used by groups, performance assessment, created and applied by the cardiologist teacher, and individual satisfaction questionnaire for students. Results: The applicability of the CCS model was satisfactory for both students and teachers. The assessment instruments' internal reliability was good, as was internal consistency with a Cronbach Alpha of 0.7, 0.4, and 0.8 for each section (Interpersonal, Clinical, and Collaborative competencies, respectively). The performance group's evaluation was 0.8 for the two competencies assessed (Tachyarrhythmia and Electrical Cardioversion) and 0.8 for the satisfaction questionnaire's reliability. Conclusions: The CCS model for teaching emergency tachyarrhythmias to medical students was applicable and well accepted. The internal reliability of the assessment instruments was considered satisfactory by measuring satisfaction and performance in the exploratory study.

Supporting the Quadruple Aim Using Simulation and Human Factors During COVID-19 Care.

The health care sector has made radical changes to hospital operations and care delivery in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This article examines pragmatic applications of simulation and human factors to support the Quadruple Aim of health system performance during the COVID-19 era. First, patient safety is enhanced through development and testing of new technologies, equipment, and protocols using laboratory-based and in situ simulation. Second, population health is strengthened through virtual platforms that deliver telehealth and remote simulation that ensure readiness for personnel to deploy to new clinical units. Third, prevention of lost revenue occurs through usability testing of equipment and computer-based simulations to predict system performance and resilience. Finally, simulation supports health worker wellness and satisfaction by identifying optimal work conditions that maximize productivity while protecting staff through preparedness training. Leveraging simulation and human factors will support a resilient and sustainable response to the pandemic in a transformed health care landscape.

Assessment of a multiprofessional training programme by in situ simulation in the maternity units of the Pays de Loire regional perinatal network.

INTRODUCTION: Initially dispensed in specialized simulation centers, simulation training has recently begun to take place directly in healthcare facilities, that is, in situ. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of training by in situ simulation in obstetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The training program, dispensed over a 2-day period, took place in maternity units of the members of the Pays de la Loire perinatal network, Réseau Sécurité Naissance (Network Safety Birth). All participants received a learner satisfaction questionnaire to complete (5-point Likert-like scales). Then, at least 6 months later, each maternity ward received a general questionnaire to assess the effect of the training, as well as a second questionnaire specific to each institution, about the areas for improvement proposed by the teaching team after debriefings. RESULTS: The 14 establishments included in our study returned 375 satisfaction questionnaires. In all, 91.1 % were very satisfied and reported that the training met their expectations, and 99.7 % thought the program would have an impact on their professional practice. More than 94 % of the learners wanted more simulation sessions. Among the 14 facilities, 9 (64.3 %) returned their evaluation questionnaires. In 44.4 % of cases, they reported improvement in team cohesion and in team communication, while the others reported these elements remained stable. All maternity units reported that the training had a positive impact on their team, and that they would be interested in new training program with in situ simulation. DISCUSSION: Most participants clearly appreciated this training. In situ simulation training also led to the identification of areas for improvements, many of them accomplished, through the drafting of protocols or material modifications aimed at improving staff practices and therefore global patient care. There are many ways by which these training programs can be made sustainable, including the development of a new training program of in situ simulation or the creation of onsite simulation sessions on demand or by the professionals at each institution. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated the enthusiasm of healthcare professionals about in situ simulation. Moreover, overall improvement in team communication and cohesion was reported in the medium term (evaluation at more than 6 months). The interest of continuing these training sessions appears undeniable.

Training in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: a critical assessment of the broad scenario of training programs and models.

Introduction: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) applications are rapidly evolving toward increasingly complex therapeutic approaches alongside with technological innovations. There are no globally agreed indications on the ERCP training path, which often requires too much time and does not always guarantee adequate skills.Areas covered: Frequency and difficulty of execution are the main objective criteria on which to draw up a training program: novel trainees should approach ERCP first through the simplest and most frequent procedures. An extensive use of training models would reduce the patient's performer-related risks. Amongst a wide variety of models, mechanical simulators have received large approval. In fact, they can be best-suited to each trainee's learning curve thanks to their precision and safety and by virtue of the unlimited repeatability of their use. However, more solid evidences are still needed.Expert opinion: Hands-on ERCP training should systematically employ mechanical simulators at least in the early stages of the learning process. An implementation of these models through sensors that objectively detect abnormalities in the movements would provide detailed feedbacks and deeper awareness. Simulators might also be useful for expert endoscopists to refine their skills. Rapid prototyping and 3D printing might be the way to create customized training models for successful training programs.

Nursing Student Medication Administration Performance: A Longitudinal Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Nurses must be adequately prepared for safe medication administration. PURPOSE: The specific aims of the study were to compare first- and final-semester nursing students' medication administration performance, describe graduating nursing student performance, assess the long-term effect of an Individual Simulation-Based Experience (ISBE), and determine if nursing assistant experience impacted performance. METHODS: The study was a longitudinal, descriptive, experimental, 2-group pretest-posttest design. The Medication Administration Safety Assessment Tool was used to assess nursing student (n = 68) medication administration performance at 3 points in time: after learning the skill, after participation in an ISBE or traditional practice session, and prior to graduation. RESULTS: Only one-third of senior nursing students accurately demonstrated medication administration. There was no significant difference between first- and last-semester performance. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest nursing students are not prepared for safe medication administration upon graduation. The reality of practice opportunities to perform this skill throughout a nursing program should be examined.

The influence of the oncology-focused transgender-simulated patient simulation on nursing students' cultural competence development.

BACKGROUND: Disparities experienced by transgender patients, especially in cancer care, leads to poorer outcomes and overall health. Simulation, using transgender simulated patients (SPs) with a focus on cancer care can be an effective way to foster cultural competence nursing education. METHODS: Guided by the National League for Nursing (NLN)/Jeffries Simulation Theory and Cultural Competence and Confidence Model, this grant funded pretest (n = 48) and posttest (n = 41) comparison group, quasi-experimental study aimed to understand changes in students' transcultural self-efficacy (TSE) following the transgender-simulated patient simulation (TSPS) focusing on an oncological emergency management. Developed by following recommended guidelines and standards, the TSPS had content validity review and pilot testing. It aimed to improve students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes with regard to providing culturally congruent nursing care. The statistical methods included paired sample t-tests, independent t-tests, and correlation analyses. RESULTS: Students who participated in the TSPS intervention had significantly higher posttest TSE scores (P < .05). DISCUSSION: SP methodology can be an effective way to foster cultural congruence in nursing care. The findings contribute to the importance of continuous efforts for the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) topic in nursing education to enhance culturally congruent care.

Evaluation of distance facilitation and technology in an interprofessional simulation exercise.

INTRODUCTION: This paper explores two objectives: (1) effectiveness of interprofessional education facilitators utilizing distance technology to facilitate and debrief an interprofessional exercise with students located on the islands Oahu and Hawai'i Island (Hilo), and (2) impact of technology on the simulation experience for facilitators and students. METHODS: Four disciplines participated in an interprofessional hospital discharge exercise for the same geriatric patient case. Two questions administered to facilitators and students after each session focused on: (1) satisfaction with the students' ability to work through the simulation, and (2) satisfaction with the use of distance technology. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences when comparing students to facilitators for the students' ability to work through the simulation. Students gave significantly lower satisfaction scores with distance technology than faculty. There were no significant differences in scores among disciplines between either facilitators or students. Pharmacy distance students had significantly lower scores for satisfaction with the simulation exercise and for the role of distance technology compared to other students. Qualitative analyses showed trend improvements over five semesters in four technology areas; volume, noise, difficulty with clarity/understanding, and seating location/placement issues for the on-site group, but only significant improvement with clarity/understanding in the distance group. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional simulation exercises can be successfully facilitated from both on-site and distance site without compromising students' ability to work through the exercise. Satisfaction with distance technology was lower for distance student groups.

Evaluation of teamwork assessment tools for interprofessional simulation: a systematic literature review.

There is growing evidence supporting the use of simulation-based education to improve teamwork in the clinical environment, which results in improved patient outcomes. Interprofessional simulation improves awareness of professional roles and responsibilities, promotes teamwork and provides training in non-technical skills. Tools have been developed to assess the quality of teamwork during simulation, but the use of these tools should be supported by validity evidence in appropriate contexts. This study aims to assess the validity of teamwork tools used in simulation-based interprofessional training for healthcare workers and students, and to compare the design and reporting of these studies. Medline, EMBASE, ERIC, and CINAHL were searched using terms synonymous with simulation, crew resource management, training, assessment, interprofessional, and teamwork, from 2007-2017. Interprofessional healthcare simulation studies involving objectively rated teamwork training were included. The initial search provided 356 records for review, of which 24 were ultimately included. Three tools demonstrated good validity evidence underpinning their use. However, three studies did not explore tool psychometrics at all, and the quality of reporting amongst these studies on design and participant demographics was variable. Further research to generate reporting guidelines and validate existing tools for new populations would be beneficial.

Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Manual Skills Pilot Validation Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology (EMIG)- Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Laparoscopic Simulation System and the EMIG Hysteroscopy Simulation System for face validity and functionality in a pilot testing environment. DESIGN: A prospective controlled pilot study. SETTING: Three teaching institutions in the US Southwest. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven residents and gynecologists, with 22 fitting who fit 1 of 4 categories of exposure to hysteroscopic and laparoscopic surgery and surgical simulation. Eleven were postgraduate year 1 and 5 postgraduate year 3, 1 was American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology certified, and 5 were either fellows in-training or had completed a fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: After completing a screening survey, each subject was exposed to a structured orientation to the 2 simulation systems and then tested with proctor supervision on the 5 laparoscopic and 2 hysteroscopic exercises. A short 5-point Likert questionnaire designed to determine face validation and question clarity was administered to each subject at sites 2 and 3. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Face validity was high for each of the 7 exercises (means ranged from 4.8 to 4.9 of 5), and subjects considered instructions to be clear (means from 4.7 to 4.9). The recorded exercise times generally reduced with increasing levels of training, although the sample sizes were not designed to determine significance given the pilot design. Similarly, exercise errors were generally less frequent with increasing experience. The systems, including the devices and recording mechanisms, performed well, and proctor evaluation and training were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The EMIG laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulations systems were considered to have good face validity and appear to be suitable for a construct validation trial to confirm their utility in distinguishing among trainees and practitioners with a wide spectrum of endoscopic surgical experience. The recording and specimen storage mechanisms will allow for multiple proctors to rate a candidate's performance, thereby enhancing evaluation consistency and quality.

Comparison of peer assessment and faculty assessment in an interprofessional simulation-based team training program.

Challenges related to limited clinical sites and shortage of clinical instructors may reduce the quality of clinical experiences, leading to increased demand for the establishment of simulation-based training programs in the curricula of educational institutions. However, simulation-based training programs in health education place great demands on faculty resources. It is interesting, therefore, to investigate peers contributions in formal assessment, and how this compares to faculty assessment. This paper report the results from the comparison of direct observation by peer observers who had received short rater training, and post-hoc video-based assessment by trained facilitators. An observation form with six learning outcomes was used to rate team performance. Altogether 262 postgraduate nursing students, bachelor of nursing students and medical students participated, organized into 44 interprofessional teams. A total of 84 peers and two facilitators rated team performance. The sum score of all six learning outcomes showed that facilitators were more lenient than peer observers (p = .014). The inter-rater reliability varied considerably when comparing scores from peer observers from the three different professions with those of the facilitators. The results indicate that peer assessment may support, but not replace, faculty assessment.

Simulation Fellowships: Survey of Current Summative Assessment Practices.

INTRODUCTION: The simulation fellowship training community has commenced efforts toward the development of core curricular elements for healthcare simulation fellowships but has not deployed the same effort to create evaluation strategies to monitor fellows' progress. The authors present a current view of simulation fellowship assessment strategies, their relative validity evidence using Kane's theoretical framework, and consider new approaches for defining expertise after training. METHODS: Fellowship directors in North America were surveyed to identify what competencies are being used by the simulation fellowship community to monitor fellows' progress. A follow-up survey was sent to further clarify which tools with published validity evidence were being applied by current programs. RESULTS: Of the 61 programs contacted, 44 (72.1%) responded and completed the first survey. Of the 44 programs, 32 (72.7%) reported using some formal assessment of their fellows. The most commonly assessed skill was debriefing. Twenty-three (37.7%) of the 61 programs contacted responded to the secondary survey. These reported that the most common published tool used was the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare, with only a few other tools mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of tools with published validity evidence being used to monitor a fellow's progression. The authors agree that further research needs to focus on creating validated assessment tools to assist in refining fellowship training.

Simulation-based assessment in anesthesia: an international multicentre validation study.

PURPOSE: Simulated clinical events provide a means to evaluate a practitioner's performance in a standardized manner for all candidates that are tested. We sought to provide evidence for the validity of simulation-based assessment tools in simulated pediatric anesthesia emergencies. METHODS: Nine centres in two countries recruited subjects to participate in simulated operating room events. Participants ranged in anesthesia experience from junior residents to staff anesthesiologists. Performances were video recorded for review and scored by specially trained, blinded, expert raters. The rating tools consisted of scenario-specific checklists and a global rating scale that allowed the rater to make a judgement about the subject's performance, and by extension, preparedness for independent practice. The reliability of the tools was classified as "substantial" (intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 for the checklists and from 0.85 to 0.94 for the global rating scale). RESULTS: Three-hundred and ninety-one simulation encounters were analysed. Senior trainees and staff significantly out-performed junior trainees (P = 0.04 and P < 0.001 respectively). The effect size of grade (junior vs senior trainee vs staff) on performance was classified as "medium" (partial η2 = 0.06). Performance deficits were observed across all grades of anesthesiologist, particularly in two of the scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the validity of our simulation-based anesthesiologist assessment tools in several domains of validity. We also describe some residual challenges regarding the validity of our tools, some notes of caution in terms of the intended consequences of their use, and identify opportunities for further research.

Interactive pedagogic tools: evaluation of three assessment systems in medical education.

Training in biology, pharmacy and medicine are essential in laboratory medicine in faculty and especially with recent residency modifications. Active learning improves critical thinking and is an essential component of health education. Interactive assessment systems for the interactive participation of students have emerged. Recently, many offers of audience response system (ARS) accessible by personal electronic devices such as smartphone, tablet or computer are available. These systems seem to be an effective teaching innovation according to students. We aimed to evaluate three pedagogical tools during real school lectures in order to be able to select them according to the needs: Votar, Socrative and Wooclap. Methods: Three connected participation tools will be tested during teaching at Lille University, faculty of pharmacy by 3 different teachers. 75 fifth-year pharmacy students divided into 2 groups of students will have attended at least one session using each of the systems studied. After lessons, an online questionnaire with 9 questions was submitted to students on their interest in each system. Questions measured student perception using a 1 to 10 scale. Results and discussion: 62 of 75 students completed online surveys and were included in the study. According students, ARS by smartphone or computer improve their education. Favorite application seems to be Socrative and Wooclap. This study provides student perception comparison of ARS. To complete, additional studies are needed to establish their efficacy after several month.

[Simulation-based interprofessional education for critical care teams: Concept, implementation and assessment]. / L'éducation interprofessionnelle des équipes de soins critiques par la simulation : concept, mise en œuvre et évaluation.

Interprofessional simulation-based education is effective for learning non-technical critical care skills and strengthening interprofessional team collaboration to optimize quality of care and patient outcome. Implementation of interprofessional simulation sessions in initial and continuing education is facilitated by a team of "champions" from each discipline/profession to ensure educational quality and logistics. Interprofessional simulation training must be integrated into a broader interprofessional curriculum supported by managers, administrators and clinical colleagues from different professional programs. When conducting interprofessional simulation training, it is essential to account for sociological factors (hierarchy, power, authority, interprofessional conflicts, gender, access to information, professional identity) both in scenario design and debriefing. Teamwork assessment tools in interprofessional simulation training may be used to guide debriefing. The interprofessional simulation setting (in-situ or simulation centre) will be chosen according to the learning objectives and the logistics.

Impact of a low-cost simulated electronic medical record on perceptions of APPE readiness.

BACKGROUND: Meaningful use of electronic medical records (EMRs) is critical for providing high-quality, patient-centered care. However, many pharmacy students are not exposed to EMRs until the experiential components of the curriculum. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: We created a low-cost simulated EMR (SEMR) using Microsoft PowerPoint software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, Version 16.16) to use in a case-based application course for second-year pharmacy students for two consecutive years. FINDINGS: Pre- and post-assessment surveys of 162 students indicated that perceived confidence and efficiency navigating EMRs improved after the activity. Students agreed that the activity enhanced learning, improved understanding of how to extract meaningful data from EMRs, benefited their preparation for the fourth professional year, and demonstrated the role of informatics in patient care. SUMMARY: Incorporation of a SEMR using Microsoft PowerPoint enhances student perceptions of proficiency in navigating the patient medical record. Adoption of similar activities into pharmacy curricula may be an attractive option when adequate financial resources for simulation are unavailable.

Reliability of peer assessment of patient education simulations.

BACKGROUND: At Belmont University College of Pharmacy, the final introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) course in the IPPE series, IPPE V, is designed to assess readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences and includes three patient counseling simulations. These simulations have required greater resources. The objective of our study was to determine if student performance on patient counseling simulations can be accurately assessed by peers. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY: Students were required to participate in patient counseling simulations throughout the semester. For each simulation, students were assigned one role: pharmacist, patient, or peer-evaluator. Each pharmacist counseled the patient on a specific product while the peer-evaluator assessed the accuracy and completeness of the counseling using a detailed checklist. The patient used a checklist to assess the pharmacist's communication skills. Faculty assessed the student evaluators and the patients by counting the number of discrepancies between the student evaluator's and the live faculty checklists. Students were surveyed at the end of the semester regarding their beliefs and perceptions of peer assessment for the communication simulations. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY: Of 65 students enrolled in the spring 2018 course, complete recordings and checklists were available for 54 simulations (83.1%). Interrater reliability was high with all correlation coefficients exceeding 0.86. Students agreed that they were comfortable assessing patient education content (82.14%) and communication skills (82.14%). Our results indicate that peer evaluation during patient education simulation is reliable and acceptable to students.

Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the "medical expert": an analysis of students' case vignettes.

Background: During clinical clerkships students experience complex and challenging clinical situations related to problems beyond the domain of the "Medical Expert". Workplace routine may leave little opportunity to reflect on these situations. The University of Zurich introduced a mandatory course directly after the clinical clerkship year (CCY) to work up these situations. Prior to the course each student submitted a vignette on a case he or she had perceived challenging during the CCY and which was not related to the domain of the "Medical Expert" role. In this paper we want to characterize these cases in respect to most prominent themes and related CanMEDS roles. The goal was to inform clinical supervisors about potential teaching demands during the CCY. Methods: All case vignettes submitted by a years' cohort were analysed by three researchers in two ways: for the clinical characteristics and the main theme of the underlying problem and the most prominent CanMEDS roles involved. Themes of the underlying problem were aggregated to overarching topics and subsequently to main categories by pragmatic thematic analysis. Results: 254 case vignettes covered the whole spectrum of clinical disciplines. A wide range of underlying themes could be assigned to five main categories: "communication within team" (23.2%), "communication with patients and relatives" (24.8%), "patient behavior and attitudes" (18.5%), "clinical decision making" (24.0%), and "social and legal issues" (9.4%). Most frequent CanMEDS roles were "Communicator" (26.9%) and "Professional" (23.5%). Conclusions: Cases students perceived as challenging beyond the "Medical Expert" were reported from all clinical disciplines. These were mainly related to communicational and professional issues, mirrored by the CanMEDS roles "Communicator" and "Professional". Therefore, supervisors in clinical clerkships should put an additional teaching focus on communication and professionalism.

Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To gather consensus among European educators about technical procedures that should be included in a future simulation based curriculum in vascular surgery. METHODS: A three round modified Delphi survey was initiated among 189 key opinion leaders (KOL) from 34 countries across Europe who were identified according to their positions in the European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes Section and Board of Vascular Surgery. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified vascular surgeon should be able to perform. The answers were analysed qualitatively. The second round investigated how often the identified procedures are performed, the number of vascular surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, whether the procedures pose a risk to the patients, and whether simulation based education (SBE) is feasible. In the third round, elimination and re-ranking of procedures were performed. Only procedures that gained more than 70% support were included. An international steering group consisting of open and endovascular surgeons and medical educators governed the process. RESULTS: Response rates in the three rounds were 75% (142/189), 89% (126/142), and 85% (107/126), respectively. In the final prioritised list of 30 technical procedures for SBE, the top five procedures focus on basic open vascular skills, basic endovascular skills, vascular imaging interpretation, femoral endarterectomy, and open peripheral bypass. Twenty-six procedures were eliminated, including peripheral pressure measurement, wound management, open management of complications, major amputations, and highly advanced endovascular skills. CONCLUSION: The prioritised list of technical procedures from this ESVS supported project could be used to guide planning and development of future SBE programs to meet the needs of vascular surgeons across Europe.