Risk factors for endocrine complications in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients on chelation therapy with deferasirox: a risk assessment study from a multi-center nation-wide cohort.

Transfusion-dependent patients typically develop iron-induced cardiomyopathy, liver disease, and endocrine complications. We aimed to estimate the incidence of endocrine disorders in transfusiondependent thalassemia (TDT) patients during long-term iron-chelation therapy with deferasirox (DFX). We developed a multi-center follow-up study of 426 TDT patients treated with once-daily DFX for a median duration of 8 years, up to 18.5 years. At baseline, 118, 121, and 187 patients had 0, 1, or ≥2 endocrine diseases respectively. 104 additional endocrine diseases were developed during the follow-up. The overall risk of developing a new endocrine complication within 5 years was 9.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 6.3-13.1). Multiple Cox regression analysis identified three key predictors: age showed a positive log-linear effect (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for 50% increase 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3, P=0.005), the serum concentration of thyrotropin showed a positive linear effect (adjusted HR for 1 mIU/L increase 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4, P<0.001) regardless the kind of disease incident, while the number of previous endocrine diseases showed a negative linear effect: the higher the number of diseases at baseline the lower the chance of developing further diseasess (adjusted HR for unit increase 0.5, 95% CI: 0.4-0.7, P<0.001). Age and thyrotropin had similar effect sizes across the categories of baseline diseases. The administration of levothyroxine as a covariate did not change the estimates. Although in DFX-treated TDT patients the risk of developing an endocrine complication is generally lower than the previously reported risk, there is considerable risk variation and the burden of these complications remains high. We developed a simple risk score chart enabling clinicians to estimate their patients' risk. Future research will look at increasing the amount of variation explained from our model and testing further clinical and laboratory predictors, including the assessment of direct endocrine magnetic resonance imaging.

Terminal residue and dietary intake risk assessment of prothioconazole-desthio and fluoxastrobin in wheat field ecosystem.

BACKGROUND: Wheat is one of the most important cereal crops worldwide, and use of fungicides is an essential part of wheat production. Both prothioconazole and fluoxastrobin give excellent control of important seed and soilborne pathogens. The combination of these two fungicides shows a complementary mode of action and has a wide usage around the world. But the residue levels of these fungicides in the wheat matrix are still unknown. RESULTS: In the current study, a simple, low-cost and highly sensitive method using modified QuECHERS procedure combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed to simultaneously quantify E- and Z-fluoxastrobin and the main metabolite prothioconazole-desthio of prothioconazole in the wheat matrix. The recoveries of prothioconazole-desthio, E-fluoxastrobin and Z-fluoxastrobin ranged from 84% to 101%, with relative standard deviation of less than 13.2%. The terminal residues of prothioconazole-desthio and E- and Z-fluoxastrobin were studied in wheat grain and straw under field conditions. The results showed that the terminal residue of the target compounds ranged from <0.01 to 0.029 mg kg-1 and <0.05 to 7.6 mg kg-1 in wheat grain and straw (expressed as dry weight), respectively. The risk quotients of prothioconazole-desthio and fluoxastrobin were 0.2% and 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The residue levels of the target analytes in wheat grain were lower than the maximum residue limits recommended by the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture. And the calculated risk quotient values were far below 100%, indicating a low dietary intake health risk to consumers. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Molecular mechanisms of posaconazole- and itraconazole-induced pseudohyperaldosteronism and assessment of other systemically used azole antifungals.

Recent reports described cases of severe hypertension and hypokalemia accompanied by low renin and aldosterone levels during antifungal therapy with posaconazole and itraconazole. These conditions represent characteristics of secondary endocrine hypertension caused by mineralocorticoid excess. Different mechanisms can cause mineralocorticoid excess, including inhibition of the adrenal steroidogenic enzymes CYP17A1 and CYP11B1, inhibition of the peripheral cortisol oxidizing enzyme 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11ß-HSD2) or direct activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). Compared to previous experiments revealing a threefold more potent inhibition of 11ß-HSD2 by itraconazole than with posaconazole, the current study found sevenfold stronger CYP11B1 inhibition by posaconazole over itraconazole. Both compounds most potently inhibited CYP11B2. The major pharmacologically active itraconazole metabolite hydroxyitraconazole (OHI) resembled the effects of itraconazole but was considerably less active. Molecular modeling calculations assessed the binding of posaconazole, itraconazole and OHI to 11ß-HSD2 and the relevant CYP enzymes, and predicted important interactions not formed by the other systemically used azole antifungals, thus providing an initial explanation for the observed inhibitory activities. Together with available clinical observations, the presented data suggest that itraconazole primarily causes pseudohyperaldosteronism through cortisol-induced MR activation due to 11ß-HSD2 inhibition, and posaconazole by CYP11B1 inhibition and accumulation of the mineralocorticoids 11-deoxycorticosterone and 11-deoxycortisol because of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) feedback activation. Therapeutic drug monitoring and introduction of upper plasma target levels may help preventing the occurrence of drug-induced hypertension and hypokalemia. Furthermore, the systemically used azole antifungals voriconazole, isavuconazole and fluconazole did not affect any of the mineralocorticoid excess targets, offering alternative therapeutic options.

CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic-guided SERM could be a cost-effective strategy in Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CYP2D6*10 genetic testing for the management of Chinese women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer treated with selective estrogen receptor modulator. Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Robustness of the model was addressed in one-way analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: The cost of strategies of tamoxifen, toremifene without genotyping and the strategy base on CYP2D6*10 genotype were $63,879.19, $90,156.60 and $95,021.41, and the quality-adjusted life years gained are 8.1588, 12.89687 and 13.85911, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the CYP2D6*10 testing versus toremifene were 5,055.74221/quality-adjusted life year, respectively. Conclusion:CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic-guided selective estrogen receptor modulator can be a cost-effective strategy in the Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Posaconazole vs. voriconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is superior to fluconazole or itraconazole in preventing invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with haematological malignancies; however, there have been reports of the comparing posaconazole and voriconazole. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective study in China enrolled AML, ALL and MDS patients, among others. Prophylaxis with posaconazole or voriconazole was administered for patients recovering from neutropenia or who had achieved complete remission. The primary emphasis was proven, probable, or possible IFDs during treatment. The cost-effectiveness, the proportion of adverse events and systemic antifungal treatment were the secondary emphasis. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were recruited to receive posaconazole (n=81) or voriconazole (n=83). The incidence rates of proven, probable or possible IFD were 2.46% (2/81) and 4.82% (4/83) in the posaconazole group and voriconazole groups, respectively (P>0.05). Only one patients experienced adverse events on posaconazole, while eleven patients experienced such events on voriconazole (P=0.003). Patients receiving posaconazole or voriconazole had similar proportions of systemic antifungal treatment: 18.52% (15/81) in the posaconazole group and 16.87% (14/83) in the voriconazole group (P>0.05). In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the prognosis of the two groups was close, but the drug acquisition costs of posaconazole were higher than those of voriconazole (P=0.021). CONCLUSION: Posaconazole and voriconazole have the same prophylactic effect against IFDs in high-risk neutropenic Chinese patients. However, the safety of posaconazole is superior to that of voriconazole, while in terms of cost-effectiveness, voriconazole has an advantage over posaconazole.

Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and estradiol and drug concentrations in patients experiencing toxicity from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Aromatase inhibitors (AI), which decrease circulating estradiol concentrations in post-menopausal women, are associated with toxicities that limit adherence. Approximately one-third of patients will tolerate a different AI after not tolerating the first. We report the effect of crossover from exemestane to letrozole or vice versa on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and whether the success of crossover is due to lack of estrogen suppression. METHODS: Post-menopausal women enrolled on a prospective trial initiating AI therapy for early-stage breast cancer were randomized to exemestane or letrozole. Those that discontinued for intolerance were offered protocol-directed crossover to the other AI after a washout period. Changes in PROs, including pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)] and functional status [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], were compared after 3 months on the first versus the second AI. Estradiol and drug concentrations were measured. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients participated in the crossover protocol, of whom 91.3% reported improvement in symptoms prior to starting the second AI. Functional status worsened less after 3 months with the second AI (HAQ mean change AI #1: 0.2 [SD 0.41] vs. AI #2: -0.05 [SD 0.36]; p = 0.001); change in pain scores was similar between the first and second AI (VAS mean change AI #1: 0.8 [SD 2.7] vs. AI #2: -0.2 [SD 2.8]; p = 0.19). No statistical differences in estradiol or drug concentrations were found between those that continued or discontinued AI after crossover. CONCLUSIONS: Although all AIs act via the same mechanism, a subset of patients intolerant to one AI report improved PROs with a different one. The mechanism of this tolerance remains unknown, but does not appear to be due to non-adherence to, or insufficient estrogen suppression by, the second AI.

Assessment of the Abuse Potential of the Orexin Receptor Antagonist, Suvorexant, Compared With Zolpidem in a Randomized Crossover Study.

Suvorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in the United States and Japan for the treatment of insomnia at a maximum dose of 20 mg. This randomized double-blind crossover study evaluated the abuse potential of suvorexant in 36 healthy recreational polydrug users with a history of sedative and psychedelic drug use. Single doses of suvorexant (40, 80, and 150 mg: 2-7.5 × maximum dose), zolpidem (15 and 30 mg: 1.5-3 × maximum dose), and placebo were administered, with a 10-day washout between treatments. Subjective and objective measures, including visual analog scales (VASs), Addiction Research Center Inventory, and cognitive/psychomotor tests, were evaluated for 24-hour postdose. Suvorexant had significantly greater peak effects on "drug liking" VAS (primary endpoint) than placebo. Although effects of suvorexant on abuse potential measures were generally similar to zolpidem, they remained constant across doses, whereas zolpidem often had greater effects at higher doses. Suvorexant (all doses) had significantly fewer effects than zolpidem 30 mg on secondary measures, such as "high" VAS, Bowdle VAS, and Addiction Research Center Inventory morphine-benzedrine group. The overall incidence of abuse-related adverse events, such as euphoric mood and hallucination, was numerically lower with suvorexant than zolpidem. In agreement with its classification as a schedule IV drug, suvorexant demonstrated abuse potential, compared with placebo. The abuse potential was similar to zolpidem using certain measures, but with a reduced incidence of abuse-related adverse events. Although this suggests that the overall abuse liability of suvorexant may be lower than zolpidem, the actual abuse rates will be assessed with the postmarketing experience.

Cost-effectiveness of Confirmatory Testing Before Treatment of Onychomycosis.

IMPORTANCE: Onychomycosis is the most common disease of the nail in adults. International guidelines urge health care professionals to perform confirmatory diagnostic testing before initiating systemic therapy. This approach was determined to be cost-effective in studies from the late 1990s but has not been evaluated more recently. The effect of testing on the costs of efinaconazole, 10%, topical solution treatment is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost and potential harm associated with 3 approaches to onychomycosis evaluation before treatment with oral terbinafine or efinaconazole, 10%. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A decision analysis that compared the costs of 3 onychomycosis management algorithms based on recently published data of test statistics, disease prevalence, and relevant costs: (1) empirical therapy without confirmatory testing, (2) pretreatment confirmatory testing with potassium hydroxide (KOH) stain followed by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) evaluation if KOH testing is negative, and (3) pretreatment testing with PAS. There was no direct patient evaluation. Selection of included studies was based on outcome variables and the quality of study design. The study was conducted from April 1, 2014, to September 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes included direct cost of onychomycosis testing and therapy and cost to avoid harm when treating patients with oral terbinafine. RESULTS: At a disease prevalence of 75%, per-patient cost savings of empirical terbinafine therapy without confirmatory testing was $47 compared with the KOH screening model and $135 compared with PAS testing. The cost of testing necessary to prevent a single case of clinically relevant liver toxic effects related to terbinafine at a prevalence of 75% was between $18.2 million and $43.7 million for KOH screening and between $37.6 million and $90.2 million for PAS testing. At a prevalence of 75%, KOH screening and PAS testing before treatment with efinaconazole, 10%, saved $272 and $406 per patient per nail, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results show that empirical treatment with terbinafine for patients with suspected onychomycosis is more cost-effective than confirmatory testing across all prevalence of disease, with minimal effect on patient safety. In contrast, confirmatory testing before treatment with efinaconazole, 10%, is associated with reduced costs. Blanket recommendations for confirmatory testing before systemic therapy should be reconsidered and replaced with recommendations tailored to specific therapies.

Does the current fungicide risk assessment provide sufficient protection for key drivers in aquatic ecosystem functioning?

The level of protection provided by the present environmental risk assessment (ERA) of fungicides in the European Union for fungi is unknown. Therefore, we assessed the structural and functional implications of five fungicides with different modes of action (azoxystrobin, carbendazim, cyprodinil, quinoxyfen, and tebuconazole) individually and in mixture on communities of aquatic hyphomycetes. This is a polyphyletic group of fungi containing key drivers in the breakdown of leaf litter, governing both microbial leaf decomposition and the palatability of leaves for leaf-shredding macroinvertebrates. All fungicides impaired leaf palatability to the leaf-shredder Gammarus fossarum and caused structural changes in fungal communities. In addition, all compounds except for quinoxyfen altered microbial leaf decomposition. Our results suggest that the European Union's first-tier ERA provides sufficient protection for the tested fungicides, with the exception of tebuconazole and the mixture, while higher-tier ERA does not provide an adequate level of protection for fungicides in general. Therefore, our results show the need to incorporate aquatic fungi as well as their functions into ERA testing schemes to safeguard the integrity of aquatic ecosystems.

Bioefficacy, residue dynamics and safety assessment of the combination fungicide trifloxystrobin 25% + tebuconazole 50%-75 WG in managing early blight of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.).

This paper reports the in vitro and in vivo bioefficacy of a combination fungicide trifloxystrobin (25%) + tebuconazole (50%) against early blight disease of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) caused by Alternaria solani and their corresponding pre-harvest intervals (PHI) with reference to the maximum residue limits (European Union). Bioefficacy of the test fungicide combination revealed that in vitro conditions manifested the best control (75.1%) at 350 mg kg(-1) against 76.2% control under field conditions. A sample preparation method based on ethyl acetate extraction and estimation by LC-MS multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was validated in tomato fruits at 0.01 mg/kg and dissipation studies were conducted in field at single and double doses. The residues of both the compounds on all the sampling days were below the European Union maximum residue limits (EU-MRLs) and the maximum permissible intakes (MPIs) were calculated on the basis of prescribed acceptable daily intake (ADI). The combined bioefficacy and residue dynamics information will support label-claim of this fungicide combination for the management of early blight in tomato.

[Rizatriptan: experience after 15 years of clinical use]. / Rizatriptan: experiencia tras 15 años de uso clinico.

We review the development of rizatriptan, one of the seven 5-HT1B/1D agonists available for the symptomatic treatment of migraine, emphasizing the most relevant contributions carried out from our country. Rizatriptan has shown the quickest onset of action, both in controlled studies and in the different metaanalyses, which translates in high efficacy levels at two hours. Its tolerability and safety profile is similar to that of the other compounds in this pharmacological group. Postlaunching studies have shown that its high efficacy leads to pharmacoeconomic savings and to a robust preference and satisfaction by the patient for this triptan. Its efficacy is improved with an early use within migraine attacks and recent data have shown also efficacy in adolescents. This global profile places rizatriptan as a triptan of first choice for any kind of migraine attacks.

TITLE: Rizatriptan: experiencia tras 15 años de uso clinico.En este trabajo se pasa revista al desarrollo del rizatriptan, uno de los siete agonistas 5-HT1B/1D disponibles para el tratamiento sintomatico de la migraña, prestando especial atencion a las aportaciones mas relevantes llevadas a cabo desde España. El rizatriptan ha demostrado ser el triptan con inicio de accion mas rapido, tanto en estudios comparativos controlados como en diversos metaanalisis, lo que se ha traducido en elevados niveles de eficacia a las dos horas. El perfil de seguridad y tolerabilidad de este triptan es similar al del resto de los compuestos de este grupo farmacologico. Los estudios poscomercializacion han evidenciado que su eficacia se traduce en ahorro farmacoeconomico y preferencia y satisfaccion del paciente con este triptan. Su eficacia mejora con su uso precoz dentro de la crisis de migraña, y datos recientes indican que el rizatriptan es util tambien en preadolescentes. Este perfil global posiciona al rizatriptan como un triptan de eleccion para cualquier tipo de crisis de migraña.

Association between drug tolerability and medical resource use in prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a retrospective analysis of the association between drug tolerability and potential economic impact measured by medical resource utilization (MRU) for prophylaxis of invasive antifungal infections (IFI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). METHODS: An open-label, multi-center study (IMPROVIT) included patients (≥12-years old) who were randomized to receive oral voriconazole (VOR) or oral itraconazole (ITR) from the alloHCT day for at least 100 days and up to 180 days. Trial data on discontinuation and MRU for the first 100 days were analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four patients were in VOR and 241 in ITR, with similar demographic distributions (average age of 43 years, 58% male, 92% Caucasian). All-cause and study drug intolerance discontinuations were less frequent with VOR than ITR (50% vs 63%, p = 0.0137; 7% vs 22%, p < 0.0001). VOR patients had longer study drug exposure (median = 96 vs 68 days, p < 0.0001; mean = 68 vs 60 days, p = 0.0044). ITR patients were 2-times more likely (p = 0.0110) to use other antifungals vs VOR patients. Controlling for treatment and key baseline variables, longer IFI prophylaxis was associated with fewer hospital days (p < 0.0001) and less other antifungal use (p < 0.0001). Patients who discontinued prophylaxis during the first 100 days incurred 10 more hospital days (p < 0.0001) and 17 more other antifungal days (p < 0.0001) compared to their counterparts. Eight more prophylaxis days were associated with ∼1 less hospital day and 3.6 less other antifungal days (p < 0.0001). Key limitation: MRU data collection was limited to the first 100 days post-transplant, which may not fully capture the real-world utilization and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' ability to tolerate and continue their antifungal prophylaxis after alloHCT is associated with less use of MRU such as other antifungals and hospital days. In the current resource-constrained healthcare environment, it is important to consider the potential economic impact of the tolerability of antifungal prophylaxis.

Voriconazole-induced photosensitivity: photobiological assessment of a case series of 12 patients.

BACKGROUND: Voriconazole, a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent increasingly used to treat aspergillosis, has been linked with acute photosensitivity and skin carcinogenesis. The action spectrum of the photosensitivity is unknown, while an indirect retinol effect secondary to the antifungal's impact on CYP450 enzymes has been proposed to contribute to the underlying mechanism. OBJECTIVES: To perform a detailed photobiological assessment of the photosensitivity presenting in a series of 12 patients treated with voriconazole. METHODS: Minimal erythemal dose thresholds (MED) to narrow wavebands of ultraviolet (UV) A, UVB and visible light were determined. Provocation testing was performed to broadband UVA (310-400 nm) and to solar-simulated radiation (SSR) (290-400 nm). Patients underwent routine photopatch testing and laboratory investigations including serum vitamin A (retinol). RESULTS: Patients (eight men, four women; median age 54years, range 40-63) experienced moderate-severe cutaneous erythema (n = 12), burning pain (n=5), itching (n=3), scaling (n=5), vesiculation (n=5) and oedema (n=1) following sunlight exposure; increased lentigines (n=4) and actinic cheilitis (n = 4) were also observed. While the majority (n=8) of patients showed normal MED thresholds to monochromator phototesting to UVB, UVA and visible light, a low MED to UVA was observed in four patients. Repeated provocation testing with broadband UVA and SSR provoked an abnormal erythema in eight and 10 patients, respectively. Serum retinol levels were mildly elevated in two patients but normal in the majority. CONCLUSION: UVA sensitivity is the predominant finding in acute voriconazole-induced photosensitivity. We found little evidence of elevated circulating retinol as the causal factor. Patients with voriconazole-induced photosensitivity require education in appropriate UVA protective measures in addition to consideration of skin surveillance for malignant sequelae.

Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone dependent breast cancer: the paradigm of the NCIC-CTG MA.17/BIG 1-97 trial.

Early hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer is a chronic relapsing disease that can remain clinically silent for many years. The NCIC-CTG MA.17/BIG 1-97 trial randomized disease-free early breast cancer patients who had received five years of adjuvant tamoxifen to either letrozole or placebo and was the first to demonstrate a benefit with extended endocrine therapy. MA.17/BIG 1-97 was stopped at the first interim analysis because disease free survival was strongly prolonged in the letrozole arm. Subsequent subset analyses and longer follow up have shown that this therapy improved survival across all groups, particularly among women with node-positive disease and those that were pre-menopausal at time of study enrolment. The MA.17/BIG 1-97 study should be considered a paradigm for extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Rufinamide: a pharmacoeconomic profile of its use as adjunctive therapy in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Rufinamide (Inovelon®), a triazole derivative, is an oral antiepileptic drug approved in the EU as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in patients aged ≥4 years. The efficacy of oral rufinamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with LGS uncontrolled on one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs was demonstrated in a pivotal, 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Rufinamide significantly reduced the 28-day frequency of both drop attacks and total seizures compared with placebo, and significantly increased the proportions of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in each seizure frequency. A significantly higher proportion of rufinamide than placebo recipients recorded an improvement in seizure severity at the end of treatment. Reductions in the frequency of drop attacks and total seizures were maintained in a long-term (up to 3 years), open-label extension study. Oral rufinamide was generally well tolerated in patients with LGS. Somnolence and vomiting were the most common adverse events occurring more frequently with rufinamide than with placebo. Two pharmacoeconomic analyses, using decision-analysis models with 3-month cycles over a time horizon of 3 years, assessed the cost effectiveness and cost utility, respectively, of rufinamide compared with topiramate and lamotrigine as adjunctive therapy in patients with LGS from the perspective of the UK NHS. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that rufinamide would be associated with incremental costs of £62 (drop attacks) or £2151 (total seizures) per 1% increase in the number of patients achieving a >50% reduction in seizure frequency over 3 years. The cost-utility analysis predicted that the incremental cost per QALY gained for rufinamide compared with the next less-costly and undominated therapy would be more than 5-fold higher than the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold range in the UK. In conclusion, the available pharmacoeconomic data indicate that rufinamide is more effective, but more expensive, than alternative adjunctive therapies approved for use in patients with LGS in the UK. Rufinamide would appear to be a cost-effective alternative to topiramate. Although rufinamide exceeds conventional cost-effectiveness thresholds when compared with lamotrigine, it may still be considered a valuable treatment option for a devastating orphan disease such as LGS.

Incidence and management of arthralgias in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors in an outpatient oncology clinic.

PURPOSE: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are routinely used as first-line adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive tumors. The current recommended length of treatment with an AI is 5 years. Arthralgias have been frequently cited as the primary reason for discontinuation of AI therapy. Various treatment strategies are proposed in literature, but a standardized treatment algorithm has not been established. The initial purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and management of AI-induced arthralgias in patients treated at Kellogg Cancer Center (KCC). Further evaluation led to the development and the implementation of a treatment algorithm and electronic medical record (EMR) documentation tools. METHODS: The retrospective chart review included 206 adult patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant therapy with an AI. A multidisciplinary treatment team consisting of pharmacists, collaborative practice nurses, and physicians met to develop a standardized treatment algorithm and corresponding EMR documentation tool. The treatment algorithm and documentation tool were developed after the study to better monitor and proactively treat patients with AI-induced arthralgias. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of arthralgias at KCC was 48% (n = 98/206). Of these patients, 32% were documented as having arthralgias within the first 6 months of therapy initiation. Patients who reported AI-induced arthralgias were younger than patients who did not report AI-induced arthralgias (61 vs. 65 years, p = 0.002). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of arthralgias in patients with a history of chemotherapy (including taxane therapy) compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.352). Of patients presenting with AI-induced arthralgias, 41% did not have physician-managed treatment documented in the EMR. A standardized treatment algorithm and electronic chart documentation tools were then developed by the multidisciplinary team.

Fluoride excess in coccidioidomycosis patients receiving long-term antifungal therapy: an assessment of currently available triazoles.

The use of voriconazole, a trifluorinated antifungal, has been associated with the development of fluoride excess and periostitis/exostoses. We evaluated a cohort of patients on long-term triazole therapy and found that other fluorinated triazoles (fluconazole and posaconazole) conferred no risk for the development of hyperfluorosis and its complications in our cohort.

Posaconazole prophylaxis during front-line chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center, real-life experience.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is effective as primary antifungal prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: The impact of primary antifungal prophylaxis administered during front-line chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia was evaluated by comparing 58 patients who received oral amphotericin B (control group) to 99 patients who received oral posaconazole (posaconazole group). The primary endpoint was the incidence of proven/probable invasive fungal diseases. Secondary endpoints included incidence of invasive aspergillosis, survival at 4 and 12 months after the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia and costs. RESULTS: Proven/probable invasive fungal diseases were documented in 51.7% of patients in the control group and in 23.2% in the posaconazole group (P=0.0002). Invasive aspergillosis was documented in 43% of patients in the control group and in 15% in the posaconazole group (P=0.002). No survival difference was observed in patients aged over 60 years. In patients aged 60 years or less, a statistically significant survival advantage was observed at 4 months, but no longer at 12 months, in the posaconazole group (P=0.03). It was calculated that in the posaconazole group there was a mean 50% cost reduction for the antifungal drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole during front-line chemotherapy was effective in preventing invasive fungal diseases in a "real-life" scenario of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, resulted in an early but transitory survival advantage in younger patients and was economically advantageous.

[Level of evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole]. / Niveau de preuve du suivi thérapeutique pharmacologique du posaconazole.

Posaconazole, systemic antifungal marketed in France since 2006, is indicated as second line in curative treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI) (aspergillosis...) and prophylaxis of IFI in patients receiving chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The analysis of the literature indicates a concentration-efficacy relationship, but to date, no study has been able to show a concentration-toxicity correlation due to its favourable safety profile and the difficulty to obtain high concentrations. In curative, maintenance of trough plasma concentrations between 0.5 and 1.5 mg/L seems to be associate with an efficacy. In prophylaxis, a threshold of 0.5 mg/L corresponds to a minimal exposure. However this target is not yet well defined. Saturation of absorption above the 800 mg oral dose limits the adjustment of concentrations. As such, the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of posaconazole can be recommended.

[Level of evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole]. / Niveau de preuve du suivi thérapeutique pharmacologique du voriconazole.

Voriconazole is a major antifungal drug with activity against endemic fungi, Candida and Aspergillus species in immunocompromised patients. Voriconazole has a good bioavailability, an high protein binding percentage in plasma and is metabolized in liver via CYP2C19. It presents important neuro- and hepatotoxicities. Some studies determined trough concentrations of voriconazole in plasma using liquid chromatography coupled with UV or tandem mass detection. These studies showed a relationship between trough concentrations of voriconazole and efficacy or toxicity. Indeed, some studies reported a relationship between a lack of clinical response and concentrations below 1 or 2 µg/mL according to the localization of infection, while toxicities are frequently observed at concentrations above 5 µg/mL. Some particular populations will have to be taken into account such as children, patients with hemodialysis-dependent renal deficiency or hepatic insufficiency, cystic fibrosis patients or those treated concomitantly with interfering drugs. According to our survey, therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole appears recommended. However, controlled studies are still necessary to validate it prospectively and to evaluate pharmacokinetically-based methods proposed for individual dose adjustment.