Implementing thrombelastography: Experiences from a level I trauma institution.

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays such as thrombelastography (TEG) and rotational thrombelastometry have proven to be important point-of-care tools in the management of acute traumatic hemorrhage. Despite the availability of prospective studies that have confirmed the utility of TEG in reducing transfusion requirements and mortality in bleeding patients when compared to conventional coagulation tests, many institutions run into barriers implementing these viscoelastic hemostatic assays due to concerns regarding cost and benefit. At our academic Level 1 trauma institution, the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery advocated for the addition of TEG to the clinical armamentarium of providers caring for injured patients and thus spearheaded the clinical implementation of TEG. With the approval of the central laboratory, the Division developed an extensive and well-trained team to run and interpret TEGs as well as perform machine validation and upkeep. The Division continues to perform point-of-care testing throughout the hospital today.

The strengths and weaknesses of viscoelastic testing compared to traditional coagulation testing.

Optimized acute bleeding management requires timely and reliable laboratory testing to detect and diagnose coagulopathies and guide transfusion therapy. Conventional coagulation tests (CCT) are inexpensive with minimal labor requirements, but CCTs may have delayed turnaround times. In addition, abnormal CCT values may not reflect in vivo coagulopathies that require treatment and may lead to overtransfusion. The use of viscoelastic testing (VET) has been rapidly expanding and is recommended by several recent bleeding guidelines. This review is intended to compare CCT to VET, review the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, and evaluate and summarize the clinical studies that compared CCT-based and VET-based transfusion algorithms. Most studies of CCT vs VET transfusion algorithms favor the use of VET in the management of massively bleeding patients due to reductions in blood product utilization, bleeding, costs, and lengths of stay.

Viscoelastic testing in liver transplantation.

Despite the lack of large randomized clinical studies, viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been a critical armamentarium for hemostatic control in liver transplantation (LT) since the 1960s. Many transplant institutions have adopted VETs in their clinical practice. Several small-size randomized clinical trials on LT patients have suggested that VET-guided hemostatic treatment algorithms have led to decreased indications for and amounts of transfused blood products, especially fresh-frozen plasma, compared to standard laboratory-based hemostatic management. VETs have also been reported to offer insight into the diagnosis and prediction of LT patients' development of hypercoagulability-related morbidity and mortality. There is still a need for VET device-specific hemostatic algorithms in LT, and clinicians must take into account the tendency to underestimate the coagulation capacity of VETs in patients with end-stage liver disease where hemostasis is rebalanced.

The role of thromboelastometry in the assessment and treatment of coagulopathy in liver transplant patients / O papel da tromboelastometria na avaliação e no tratamento da coagulopatia em pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático

ABSTRACT Perioperative monitoring of coagulation is vital to assess bleeding risks, diagnose deficiencies associated with hemorrhage, and guide hemostatic therapy in major surgical procedures, such as liver transplantation. Routine static tests demand long turnaround time and do not assess platelet function; they are determined on plasma at a standard temperature of 37°C; hence these tests are ill-suited for intraoperative use. In contrast, methods which evaluate the viscoelastic properties of whole blood, such as thromboelastogram and rotational thromboelastometry, provide rapid qualitative coagulation assessment and appropriate guidance for transfusion therapy. These are promising tools for the assessment and treatment of hyper- and hypocoagulable states associated with bleeding in liver transplantation. When combined with traditional tests and objective assessment of the surgical field, this information provides ideal guidance for transfusion strategies, with potential improvement of patient outcomes.

RESUMO A monitorização perioperatória da coagulação é fundamental para estimar o risco de sangramento, diagnosticar deficiências causadoras de hemorragia e guiar terapias hemostáticas durante procedimentos cirúrgicos de grande porte, como o transplante hepático. Os testes estáticos, comumente usados na prática clínica, são insatisfatórios no intraoperatório, pois demandam tempo e não avaliam a função plaquetária; são determinados no plasma e realizados em temperatura padrão de 37°C. Os métodos que avaliam as propriedades viscoelásticas do sangue total, como o tromboelastograma e a tromboelastometria rotacional, podem suprir as deficiências dos testes estáticos tradicionais, uma vez que permitem avaliar a coagulação de forma rápida e qualitativa, guiando a terapia transfusional de forma adequada. A tromboelastometria rotacional mostrou-se promissora na avaliação e no tratamento de estados de hipercoagulação e hipocoagulação, associados a sangramento no transplante hepático. Estas informações, combinadas com os testes tradicionais e uma avaliação objetiva do campo cirúrgico, promovem um cenário ótimo para guiar as estratégias transfusionais e potencialmente melhorar o desfecho destes pacientes.

The role of thromboelastometry in the assessment and treatment of coagulopathy in liver transplant patients.

Perioperative monitoring of coagulation is vital to assess bleeding risks, diagnose deficiencies associated with hemorrhage, and guide hemostatic therapy in major surgical procedures, such as liver transplantation. Routine static tests demand long turnaround time and do not assess platelet function; they are determined on plasma at a standard temperature of 37°C; hence these tests are ill-suited for intraoperative use. In contrast, methods which evaluate the viscoelastic properties of whole blood, such as thromboelastogram and rotational thromboelastometry, provide rapid qualitative coagulation assessment and appropriate guidance for transfusion therapy. These are promising tools for the assessment and treatment of hyper- and hypocoagulable states associated with bleeding in liver transplantation. When combined with traditional tests and objective assessment of the surgical field, this information provides ideal guidance for transfusion strategies, with potential improvement of patient outcomes. RESUMO A monitorização perioperatória da coagulação é fundamental para estimar o risco de sangramento, diagnosticar deficiências causadoras de hemorragia e guiar terapias hemostáticas durante procedimentos cirúrgicos de grande porte, como o transplante hepático. Os testes estáticos, comumente usados na prática clínica, são insatisfatórios no intraoperatório, pois demandam tempo e não avaliam a função plaquetária; são determinados no plasma e realizados em temperatura padrão de 37°C. Os métodos que avaliam as propriedades viscoelásticas do sangue total, como o tromboelastograma e a tromboelastometria rotacional, podem suprir as deficiências dos testes estáticos tradicionais, uma vez que permitem avaliar a coagulação de forma rápida e qualitativa, guiando a terapia transfusional de forma adequada. A tromboelastometria rotacional mostrou-se promissora na avaliação e no tratamento de estados de hipercoagulação e hipocoagulação, associados a sangramento no transplante hepático. Estas informações, combinadas com os testes tradicionais e uma avaliação objetiva do campo cirúrgico, promovem um cenário ótimo para guiar as estratégias transfusionais e potencialmente melhorar o desfecho destes pacientes.

The TEG®6s on Shaky Ground? A Novel Assessment of the TEG®6s Performance under a Challenging Condition.

Thromboelastography® (TEG®) is used to guide clinical decision-making across many medical and surgical subspecialties. Advances in this field have resulted in analyzers becoming increasingly user friendly, and have led to a reduction in the possibility of user error. The new TEG®6s does not come with the warnings of vibration and movement avoidance of its predecessor. It was decided to test the capability of this device while being subject to motion. TEG®6s machine 1 was placed in an environment free from motion. TEG®6s machine 2 was placed on a flatbed platelet agitator, which would expose the device to sudden and continual motion. Blood from the same healthy volunteer was pipetted into cartridges and inserted into both machines. Testing was commenced on machine 2 simultaneously with the agitator being activated. Visual and numerical data were collected. All measured parameters were significantly different (p < .05) between the motion and motion-free groups apart from CK R-Time, CRT R-Time, CRT Angle, and CRT Ly30. The TEG®6s results differ significantly when the analyzer is exposed to a set amount of motion. Such motion should be avoided if results are to be relied upon.

Assessment of hemostaseologic alterations induced by hyperbaric oxygen therapy using point-of-care analyzers.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to hyperbaric conditions influences the coagulation system. Thromboembolic events and disseminated intravascular coagulation were observed. OBJECTIVES: To detect the effects of a hyperbaric environment on the human coagulation system using the point-of-care coagulation analyzers Multiplate and ROTEM. PATIENTS/METHODS: 20 patients were included. Each received 90 minutes of oxygen intermittently at 2.4 atmospheres absolute, as per the TS 240-90 wound-healing protocol. Blood samples were taken before and after hyperbaric exposure and ROTEM, Multiplate and standard laboratory assays were subsequently performed. RESULTS: ROTEM showed a significant increase of the maximum clot firmness (EXTEM MCF; p < 0.05) and the thromboelastometric platelet component of the clot firmness (MCF(EXTEM) - MCF(FIBTEM); p < 0.01). Multiplate showed a platelet activation mediated by thrombin (AU TRAP-test; p < 0.05) and by arachidonic acid (AUC ASPI-test; p < 0.01). Standard laboratory assays revealed a lower activated partial thromboplastin time (p < 0.05) and a higher leukocyte count (p < 0.05). No further changes were detected. A t-test was performed after testing if data followed normal distribution. CONCLUSIONS: ROTEM and Multiplate were able to detect an activation of platelets after HBO2 therapy via thrombin and arachidonic acid pathways. Previously reported fibrinolysis could not be confirmed.

Improvements in patient blood management for pediatric craniosynostosis surgery using a ROTEM(®) -assisted strategy - feasibility and costs.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe intraoperative bleeding and the presence of acquired coagulopathy remain serious problems in the management of major pediatric craniosynostosis surgery. After implementation of a ROTEM(®) -assisted patient blood management (PBM) strategy, using primarily purified coagulation factor concentrates, feasibility and costs of this new regimen were analyzed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive children who underwent primary elective major craniofacial surgery for craniosynostosis repair was carried out at the Children's University Hospital, Zurich, between 2007 and 2013. Laboratory workup and transfusion requirements were compared. RESULTS: A total of 47 children (36 in the historic group and 11 after implementation of PBM) were analyzed. Although all patients in this study needed transfusion of red blood cell concentrates, there was a total avoidance of perioperative transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and a reduction in transfused platelets (one of nine children vs nine of 36 children in the historic group) after implementation of the PBM strategy. Based on a predefined ROTEM(®) threshold in the PBM group (FibTEM MCF <8 mm), administration of fibrinogen concentrate was necessary in all of these children. The mean total costs per patient consisting of transfused allogeneic blood products and coagulation factor concentrates were reduced by 17.1% after implementation of PBM (1071.82 EUR per patient before vs 888.93 EUR after implementation). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a ROTEM(®) -assisted PBM is feasible and is associated with a considerable reduction in intraoperative transfusion requirements and thereby a decrease in transfusion-related direct costs.

Perioperative assessment of platelet function by Thromboelastograph Platelet Mapping in cardiovascular patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

UNLABELLED: Five percent of patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery stent implantation will need non-cardiac surgery within the first year of therapy, and many more will need surgery later on. A function assay that evaluates platelet reactivity and inhibition by drug therapy is beneficial for such patients. Platelet Mapping assay (PM) using the TEG analyzer was tested in surgical patients. After IRB approval, 60 patients on combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy were consented and enrolled. The TEG maximal amplitude (MA) and the percentage (%) platelet inhibition were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-seven patients (mean age 65.7 ± 10.9 years) had preoperative data only. Distribution of preoperative ADP (43.6 ± 24.4%) and AA inhibition (52.8 ± 30.2%) was determined, as well as for the preoperative MA ADP (43.1 ± 15.9 mm) and MA AA (37.2 ± 19.6 mm), showing an offset of the effect of both medications starting from day 3. Patients with complete pre- and postoperative data were stratified depending on duration off antiplatelet therapy (≤3 days, 3-7 days and >7 days): n = 27, ADP % preop inhibition (43.2 ± 21.6%), ADP % postop inhibition (32.3 ± 18.3%), p = 0.048. Distribution of immediate pre- and post- ADP and AA % inhibitions, showing a possible reduction in Δ of inhibition for clopidogrel at 3 days, were also assessed. CONCLUSION: According to the findings, the TEG PM assay might be a feasible approach to objectively evaluate the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel during the perioperative period and potentially guide drug management.

Assessment of coagulation in the obstetric population using ROTEM® thromboelastometry.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of maternal coagulation to determine suitability for neuraxial anaesthesia and management of obstetric haemorrhage remains a challenge. Thromboelastography provides point of care patient assessment of the viscoelastic properties of whole blood clotting and can assist the clinician in haemostatic decision-making. The study aim was to determine the ROTEM® thromboelastometer 95% reference limits for third trimester parturients and to compare these with non-pregnant female controls. METHODS: Following ethics committee approval and informed consent, citrated blood was sampled from 120 age-matched healthy pregnant and non-pregnant women. Thromboelastometry, using a ROTEM® point of care monitor, was performed with specific activators to measure the coagulation time (CT), clot formation time (CFT) and the maximal clot firmness (MCF) in order to evaluate the extrinsic (EXTEM® test) and intrinsic (INTEM® test) coagulation systems, as well as the fibrinogen contribution to coagulation (FIBTEM® test). RESULTS: After exclusions, data from 54 subjects in each group were analysed. Parturients had significantly lower haemoglobin values and platelet counts (P<0.01). Despite this, thromboelastometry exhibited significantly lower INTEM® CT (7.3%), INTEM® CFT (11.1%) and EXTEM® CFT (18.0%) in the pregnant group (P<0.001). MCF values were significantly higher (INTEM® (10.9%), EXTEM® (10.6%) and FIBTEM® (47.1%)) in the pregnant group compared to the non-pregnant group (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ROTEM® thromboelastometry clearly demonstrates the hypercoagulability of pregnancy. Formal reference ranges for ROTEM® that may be potentially useful in the haemostatic management of the parturient are presented.

An assessment of clinical interchangeability of TEG and RoTEM thromboelastographic variables in cardiac surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Bedside thromboelastography is increasingly used, but an assessment of the clinical interchangeability of the 2 major systems, TEG (Hemoscope) and RoTEM (Pentapharm), has not been performed. METHODS: We measured blood samples from 46 cardiac surgical patients after induction of anesthesia with kaolin TEG(R) (kaoTEG), native TEG(R) (natTEG), intrinsic RoTEM (inTEM), and extrinsic RoTEM (exTEM). Each measurement consisted of reaction time (R), coagulation time (K), maximum amplitude (MA), and angle (alpha). Bland-Altman plots and mixed-model analysis were used. To assess repeatability, we made 7 replicated measurements in rapid succession in 2 volunteers. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six measurements were available for analysis. The R time of the kaoTEG (345 + or - 102 seconds, mean + or - sd) was longer than that of the inTEM (179 + or - 74 seconds, P < 0.001) and the exTEM (55 + or - 28 seconds, P < 0.001). The K time of the kaoTEG (78 + or - 18s) was not different from that of the inTEM (75 + or - 52 seconds, P = 0.60) but was longer than the K time of the exTEM (61 + or - 24 seconds, P < 0.003). The MA of the kaoTEG (71 + or - 6.5 mm) was larger than the MA of the inTEM (67 + or - 5.2 mm, P < 0.02) and almost similar to that of the exTEM (69 + or - 6.3 mm). The alpha of the kaoTEG (72 degrees + or - 4.1 degrees ) was not significantly different from that of both the inTEM (76 degrees + or - 7 degrees ) and the exTEM (79 degrees + or - 4.5 degrees ). The variability for MA and alpha was <10%. The repeatability of the R and K times was poor in both devices, whereas the repeatability of the MA and alpha was sufficient for clinical purposes. CONCLUSIONS: The TEG and RoTEM measurements demonstrated a close correlation for the MA, but the alpha did not for the R and K variables. The kaoTEG had the best agreement with the exTEM measurement. Therefore TEG and RoTEM measurements are not completely interchangeable, and the clinical interpretation of thromboelastograhic data should be used with caution.

The TEG vs the ROTEM thromboelastography/thromboelastometry systems.

We have evaluated the TEG thromboelastograph and the ROTEM thromboelastometer, two point-of-care devices that measure blood coagulation. During a one-week period, seven consultant anaesthetists, one consultant haematologist, one associate specialist anaesthetist and two senior trainee anaesthetists were trained by the manufacturers and set up, calibrated and used both systems, after which their views were obtained and specific technical/support information was sought from the manufacturers using a questionnaire. Although the devices shared common features, they differed in complexity and aspects of ease of use, and in their purchase and running costs.

Hemostatic function in healthy pregnant and preeclamptic women: an assessment using the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) and thromboelastograph.

BACKGROUND: The PFA-100 is a point-of-care platelet function analyzer which measures the speed of formation of a platelet plug in vitro, expressed as closure time (CT) in seconds. This device could potentially be used to assess primary hemostasis prior to regional anesthesia. In this prospective, observational study we sought to establish 95% reference intervals for PFA-100 and Thromboelastograph (TEG) values for our normal pregnant population, before comparing the PFA and TEG in measuring platelet function in preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women at term, using confidence interval analysis and analysis of variance. METHODS: Routine hematologic and coagulation tests were performed along with von Willebrand Factor, CT, and TEG measurements. Results are expressed as mean (sd). RESULTS: Increased severity of preeclampsia was associated with increasing prolongation of CT, even in the presence of normal platelet counts. In severe preeclampsia, the PFA-100 CT (mean (sd): 155 (65) s) exceeded the 95% reference interval of the control group (70-139 s). In contrast, TEG maximum amplitude (MA) in severe preeclampsia (mean (sd): 71 (8) mm) remained within the 95% reference interval for MA in normal pregnancy (64-82 mm). CONCLUSION: We conclude that impairment of primary hemostatic function with increasing severity of preeclampsia was recorded by the PFA-100 but not the TEG.

Does prior administration of enoxaparin influence the effects of levobupivacaine on blood clotting? Assessment using the Thrombelastograph.

The low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin (by inhibition of factors Xa and IIa) and amide local anaesthetics (by altering platelet function) exert anti-clotting effects. Although these agents are often used in combination during the perioperative period, their potential interactive effect on clotting has not been defined. Blood from 10 ASA I-II patients who received enoxaparin 0.5 mg kg(-1) s.c. was studied using a Thrombelastograph (TEG) either alone or in combination with levobupivacaine (2.5 mg ml(-1) or 2.5 microg ml(-1)) or saline (50% dilution). In blood from patients who had received enoxaparin 0.5 mg kg(-1) s.c. 12 h previously, levobupivacaine 2.5 mg ml(-1) (but not 2.5 microg ml(-1)) produced significant changes in TEG clotting parameters (mean (SD) 15.7 (4.8) mm, 29.6 (25.6) mm, 34.4 (14.6) mm, 34.3 (12.2) degrees compared with control values of 6.1 (1.3) mm, 2.5 (0.5) mm, 63.5 (6.4) mm and 74.1 (2.9) degrees for r, K, MA, and alpha angle respectively).

Usefulness of thrombelastography in assessment of trauma patient coagulation.

OBJECTIVE: Thrombelastography (TEG) is used to rapidly assess coagulation abnormalities in cardiac and transplant surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate TEG in the initial assessment of trauma patient coagulation. METHODS: TEG was performed on 69 adult blunt trauma patients during their initial evaluation. Demographics, history of inherited coagulopathies, medications, TEG parameters, platelet count, prothrombin time/partial thromboplastin time, Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), use of blood products, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Mortality was 4.3%. Fifty-two patients demonstrated coagulation abnormalities by TEG; of these, 45 were hypercoagulable (mean ISS 13.1), and seven were hypocoagulable (mean ISS 28.6). Six of the seven hypocoagulable patients received blood transfusions within the first 24 hours. Mean ISS of the 17 patients with normal TEG parameters was 3.7. Logistic regression of ISS, Revised Trauma Score, prothrombin time/partial thromboplastin time, and TEG on use/nonuse of blood products within the first 24 hours demonstrates that only ISS (p < 0.001) and TEG (p < 0.05) are predictive of early transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of blunt trauma patients in this series were hypercoagulable. TEG is a rapid, simple test that can broadly determine coagulation abnormalities. TEG is an early predictor of transfusion in blunt injury patients.