A Retrospective Assessment of Thrombophilia in Pregnant Women with First and Second Trimester Pregnancy Loss.

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL) affects between 1% to 5% of women of reproductive age. It is widely believed that RPL is a complex disorder that is influenced by chromosomal abnormalities, genetic mutations, uterine anatomic deformity, endocrine dysfunction, immunologic factors, infections, and the environment. Thrombotic disorders are a frequent cause of RPL, accounting for almost half of all cases; however, in the rest of the cases, the cause of RPL remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, it was planned to determine the genetic mutations involved in RPL during the first and second trimester of pregnancy. An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2021, collecting data from 157 first trimester miscarriages and 54 s trimester pregnancies. All patients with a panel of laboratory and genetic analysis for thrombophilia were included for data analysis. It was observed that four factors were significantly more prevalent in one of the groups. Factor V Leiden (FVL) homozygosity and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) antibodies were statistically significantly more common in pregnant women who suffered first trimester pregnancy losses. On the other hand, Protein C deficiency and Glycoprotein Ia polymorphism were statistically significantly more frequent in the second trimester group. The strongest independent risk factors for first trimester pregnancy loss were FVL and prothrombin (PT) compound mutations (OR = 3.11), followed by FVL homozygous mutation (OR = 3.66), and APS antibodies (OR = 4.47). Regarding second trimester pregnancy loss risk factors, the strongest were FVL and PT compound (OR = 3.24), followed by Glycoprotein Ia polymorphism (OR = 3.61), and respectively, APS antibodies (OR = 3.85). Numerous thrombophilic risk factors for early and late pregnancy loss have been found, including several mutations that seem to occur more often either during the first or the second trimester. Even though we are aware of risk-free and efficient diagnostics for thrombophilia abnormalities, no intervention has been proved to be clearly successful after the detection of these variables.

The hypercoagulable state in COVID-19: Incidence, pathophysiology, and management.

The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) presents with a large variety of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic carrier state to severe respiratory distress, multiple organ dysfunction and death. While it was initially considered primarily a respiratory illness, rapidly accumulating data suggests that COVID-19 results in a unique, profoundly prothrombotic milieu leading to both arterial and venous thrombosis. Consistently, elevated D-dimer level has emerged as an independent risk factor for poor outcomes, including death. Several other laboratory markers and blood counts have also been associated with poor prognosis, possibly due to their connection to thrombosis. At present, the pathophysiology underlying the hypercoagulable state is poorly understood. However, a growing body of data suggests that the initial events occur in the lung. A severe inflammatory response, originating in the alveoli, triggers a dysfunctional cascade of inflammatory thrombosis in the pulmonary vasculature, leading to a state of local coagulopathy. This is followed, in patients with more severe disease, by a generalized hypercoagulable state that results in macro- and microvascular thrombosis. Of concern, is the observation that anticoagulation may be inadequate in many circumstances, highlighting the need for alternative or additional therapies. Numerous ongoing studies investigating the pathophysiology of the COVID-19 associated coagulopathy may provide mechanistic insights that can direct appropriate interventional strategies.

[Susceptibility genetics of common conditions in clinical practice]. / Des tests génétiques pour prédire des maladies communes.

The genetic tests for "non-rare thrombophilias" (TNR) were introduced into clinical setting immediately after the identification of genetic variants in the mid-90s to predict and prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although being a rare example of a genetic test of susceptibility for complex diseases that has been integrated in medical routine, it is the most widespread post-natal genetics inquiry in France nowadays. Yet, determining whom to test and how to use the results is still controversial. This article outlines the trajectory of its clinical regulation and illustrates the importance of the context of use to understand its diffusion. This analysis is intended to feed a more general reflection on the issues raised by the clinical integration of genetic surveys for common diseases, particularly with regard to the clinical utility of a test (statistical vs. biological), the subjects to be tested (the case index and/or her/his relatives), and the criteria underlying access to these tests (modalities of medico-economic assessment).

TITLE: Des tests génétiques pour prédire des maladies communes. ABSTRACT: Introduit au lendemain de l'identification des « thrombophilies non rares ¼ (TNR), au milieu des années 1990 afin de prédire et de prévenir la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV), le bilan génétique pour ces thrombophilies est un exemple assez rare de test génétique de susceptibilité pour une maladie complexe, à avoir franchi le pas d'un véritable usage de routine en clinique. Bien que ce test soit le plus répandu des tests de génétique post-natale en France, son usage (À qui proposer le test ? Que faire des résultats ?) fait encore l'objet de débats. Cet article analyse la trajectoire de régulation clinique de ce test et illustre l'importance du contexte spécifique d'usage pour comprendre sa diffusion. Cette analyse vise à nourrir une réflexion plus générale sur les enjeux que pose l'intégration clinique des tests génétiques pour les maladies communes, en considérant notamment les modalités de définition de l'utilité clinique d'un test (statistique versus biologique), des sujets du test (le cas index versus ses apparentés), et des critères en sous-tendant l'accès (modalités des calculs médico-économiques).

Genetic risk assessment of thrombophilia in patients with adverse obstetric outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of inherited thrombophilias in patients with adverse obstetric outcomes and to compare detection rates of thrombophilias between standard blood tests and a novel genetic test. METHODS: This is a case-control prospective study performed in Hospital Sant Joan de Déu in Barcelona, Spain. Cases had a history of intrauterine growth restriction requiring delivery before 34 weeks gestation, placental abruption before 34 weeks gestation, or severe preeclampsia. Controls had at least two normal, spontaneously conceived pregnancies at term, without complications or no underlying medical disease. At least 3 months after delivery, all case and control women underwent blood collection for standard blood tests for thrombophilias and saliva collection for the genetic test, which enables the diagnosis of 12 hereditary thrombophilias by analyzing genetic variants affecting different points of the blood coagulation cascade. RESULTS: The study included 33 cases and 41 controls. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in the standard blood tests for thrombophilias in plasma or the TiC test for genetic variables. One clinical-genetic model was generated using variables with the lowest P values: ABO, body mass index, C_rs5985, C_rs6025, and protein S. This model exhibited good prediction capacity, with an area under the curve of almost 0.7 (P <0.05), sensitivity of almost 67%, and specificity of 70%. CONCLUSION: Although some association may exist between hypercoagulability and pregnancy outcomes, no significant direct correlation was observed between adverse obstetric outcomes and inherited thrombophilias when analyzed using either standard blood tests or the genetic test. Future studies with a larger sample size are required to create a clinical-genetic model that better discriminates women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes and an increased risk of poor outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.

Magnitude of Potentially Inappropriate Thrombophilia Testing in the Inpatient Hospital Setting.

Laboratory costs of thrombophilia testing exceed an estimated $650 million (in US dollars) annually. Quantifying the prevalence and financial impact of potentially inappropriate testing in the inpatient hospital setting represents an integral component of the effort to reduce healthcare expenditures. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our electronic medical record to evaluate 2 years' worth of inpatient thrombophilia testing measured against preformulated appropriateness criteria. Cost data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2016 Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule. Of the 1817 orders analyzed, 777 (42.7%) were potentially inappropriate, with an associated cost of $40,422. The tests most frequently inappropriately ordered were Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C and S activity levels, antithrombin activity levels, and the lupus anticoagulant. Potentially inappropriate thrombophilia testing is common and costly. These data demonstrate a need for institution-wide changes in order to reduce unnecessary expenditures and improve patient care.

Analysis of Thrombophilia Test Ordering Practices at an Academic Center: A Proposal for Appropriate Testing to Reduce Harm and Cost.

Ideally, thrombophilia testing should be tailored to the type of thrombotic event without the influence of anticoagulation therapy or acute phase effects which can give false positive results that may result in long term anticoagulation. However, thrombophilia testing is often performed routinely in unselected patients. We analyzed all consecutive thrombophilia testing orders during the months of October and November 2009 at an academic teaching institution. Information was extracted from electronic medical records for the following: indication, timing, comprehensiveness of tests, anticoagulation therapy at the time of testing, and confirmatory repeat testing, if any. Based on the findings of this analysis, we established local guidelines in May 2013 for appropriate thrombophilia testing, primarily to prevent testing during the acute thrombotic event or while the patient is on anticoagulation. We then evaluated ordering practices 22 months after guideline implementation. One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the study. Only 34% (58/173) had appropriate indications (unprovoked venous or arterial thrombosis or pregnancy losses). 51% (61/119) with an index clinical event were tested within one week of the event. Although 46% (79/173) were found to have abnormal results, only 46% of these had the abnormal tests repeated for confirmation with 54% potentially carrying a wrong diagnosis with long term anticoagulation. Twenty-two months after guideline implementation, there was an 84% reduction in ordered tests. Thus, this study revealed that a significant proportion of thrombophilia testing was inappropriately performed. We implemented local guidelines for thrombophilia testing for clinicians, resulting in a reduction in healthcare costs and improved patient care.

Assessment of algorithms to identify patients with thrombophilia following venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Routine testing for thrombophilia following venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. The use of large datasets to study the clinical impact of thrombophilia testing on patterns of care and patient outcomes may enable more efficient analysis of this practice in a wide range of settings. We set out to examine how accurately algorithms using International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes and/or pharmacy data reflect laboratory-confirmed thrombophilia diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample of adult Kaiser Permanente Colorado patients diagnosed with unprovoked VTE between 1/2004 and 12/2010 underwent medical record abstraction of thrombophilia test results. Algorithms using "ICD-9" (positive if a thrombophilia ICD-9 code was present), "Extended anticoagulation (AC)" (positive if AC therapy duration was >6 months), and "ICD-9 & Extended AC" (positive for both) criteria to identify possible thrombophilia cases were tested. Using positive thrombophilia laboratory results as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value of each algorithm were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In our cohort of 636 patients, sensitivities were low (<50%) for each algorithm. "ICD-9" yielded the highest PPV (41.5%, 95% CI 26.3-57.9%) and a high specificity (95.9%, 95% CI 94.0-97.4%). "Extended AC" had the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity, and "ICD-9 & Extended AC" had the highest specificity but lowest sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-9 codes for thrombophilia are highly specific for laboratory-confirmed cases, but all algorithms had low sensitivities. Further development of methods to identify thrombophilia patients in large datasets is warranted.

A longitudinal analysis of risk factors associated with central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) among a diverse group of patients throughout the United States. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All beneficiaries aged ≥ 55 years who were continuously enrolled in a managed care network for at least 2 years and who had ≥ 2 visits to an eye care provider from 2001 to 2009. METHODS: Insurance billing codes were used to identify individuals with a newly diagnosed CRVO. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to determine the factors associated with CRVO development. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of being diagnosed with CRVO. RESULTS: Of the 494 165 enrollees who met the study inclusion criteria, 1302 (0.26%) were diagnosed with CRVO over 5.4 (± 1.8) years. After adjustment for known confounders, blacks had a 58% increased risk of CRVO compared with whites (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.25-1.99), and women had a 25% decreased risk of CRVO compared with men (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85). A diagnosis of stroke increased the hazard of CRVO by 44% (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.23-1.68), and hypercoagulable state was associated with a 145% increased CRVO risk (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.40-4.28). Individuals with end-organ damage from hypertension (HTN) or diabetes mellitus (DM) had a 92% (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.52-2.42) and 53% (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.28-1.84) increased risk of CRVO, respectively, relative to those without these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that HTN and vascular diseases are important risk factors for CRVO. We also identify black race as being associated with CRVO, which was not well appreciated previously. Furthermore, we show that compared with patients without DM, individuals with end-organ damage from DM have a heightened risk of CRVO, whereas those with uncomplicated DM are not at increased risk of CRVO. This finding may provide a potential explanation for the conflicting reports in the literature on the association between CRVO and DM. Information from analyses such as this can be used to create a risk calculator to identify possible individuals at greatest risk for CRVO.

Immune globulins and thrombotic adverse events as recorded in a large administrative database in 2008 through 2010.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic events (TEs) are rare but often serious adverse events that could occur after administration of immune globulin (IG) products. Our study objective was to assess occurrence of recorded TEs after administration of different US-licensed IG products and investigate potential risk factors using a large administrative database. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective claims-based cohort study of individuals exposed to IG products from January 1, 2008, through September 30, 2010, using HealthCore's Integrated Research Database, a longitudinal health care database. IG products were identified by recorded Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. TEs were ascertained via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for same-day TEs by IG product, while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Of 11,785 individuals exposed to IG products in the study period, 122 (1%) had TE(s) recorded on the same day as IG administration. TE rates per 1000 persons exposed ranged from 6.1 to 20.5 for different IG product groups. Vivaglobin users had an increased same-day TE risk compared to reference Gammagard Liquid users (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.54-8.23). An increased TE risk was also found with older age (≥ 45 years), prior TE(s), and hypercoagulable state(s). CONCLUSION: The study suggests potentially elevated TE rates for different IG products, including subcutaneous. It also identifies important recipient TE risk factors and suggests that risk-benefit profiles should be weighed before IG administration. The observed differences may be due to various factors such as dosage, administration rates, and product manufacturing processes that warrant further evaluation.

Rates of venous thromboembolism occurrence in medical patients among the insured population.

The burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains high in the United States (US). This study assesses the rate of VTE prophylaxis in a large real-world population of medically ill patients and identifies factors which confer VTE risk to this population. Discharges from the PharMetrics database were included if they were aged > or =40 years and had a hospitalisation claim (Jan 2001-Dec 2005) for cancer, congestive heart failure (CHF), severe infectious disease (SID), or lung disease. Discharges with incomplete records in the prior year to the index hospitalisation claim date were excluded. VTE rate, type (deep venous thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]), and time to VTE were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of VTE occurrence. A total of 158,325 patients were included in the study. Cancer patients had the highest incidence of VTE (7.6%), with the average for all patients being 5.6% (1.5% PE). VTE occurred most frequently post discharge, with the median time being 74 days. Post-discharge prophylaxis was provided to 13.1% of CHF patients and < 5% of all other patients. Independent predictors of VTE included a pre-index VTE (odds ratio [OR] 9.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.28-9.91) and a primary diagnosis of cancer compared with a diagnosis of SID (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.46). In conclusion, commercially insured medical patients in the US are at high risk of VTE following hospital discharge. One-quarter of medical patients who developed a VTE are at high risk of developing the more severe form of the disease, namely PE, with independent predictors of VTE in the post-discharge period including previous VTE and cancer.

Assessment of coagulation and fibrinolysis in families with unexplained thrombophilia.

Despite knowledge of various inherited risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE), no definite cause can be found in about 50% of patients. The lack of an intermediate phenotype in VTE impedes the discovery of new familial risk factors. We set out to define an intermediate phenotype for VTE by performing global coagulation analyses in unexplained thrombophilic families. Families were selected through a proband with VTE but without one of the known thrombophilic defects and at least one 1st or two 2nd degree family members with VTE. Clinical data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Blood samples were collected for overall haemostasis assays (i.e. thrombin generation time [TGT], endogenous thrombin potential [ETP], prothrombin fragment 1+2 [F1+2] and activated protein C-sensitivity ratio [APC-sr] and clot lysis time [CLT]). Data were analysed using logistic regression. Coagulation assays were performed in 353 individuals of whom 41 (12%) had a history of VTE; these belonged to 17 thrombophilic families. Of the tested variables only the ETP was associated with VTE (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 for each % increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05). However, the relatively low number of cases does not firmly exclude the other assays as candidate intermediate phenotypes for venous thrombosis. We found that an increased ETP may serve as an intermediate phenotype for VTE and may be used to discover novel inherited risk factors by genetic linkage analysis.

[Cardiovascular risk assessment and intervention in HIV-infected patients]. / Evaluación del riesgo cardiovascular e intervención en los pacientes con VIH.

Because of the increased cardiovascular risk (CVR) in HIV-positive patients, preventive measures are essential, requiring algorithms for risk estimation, such as the Framingham risk equation, the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM) algorithm and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart. Classical cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) are closely related to CVR in HIV-infected patients but whether this risk is comparable to that in the general population is unknown. Therefore, these algorithms probably underestimate the risk in these patients. Currently, application of the same strategies as those used in the general population is recommended, without forgetting the specific characteristics of HIV positive patients or the importance of their inflammatory status, which can accelerate the development of arteriosclerosis and lead to an increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in addition to traditional CVRF, biological markers of inflammation could help to identify the patients most at risk of a cardiovascular event. These markers, as well as the diverse techniques for assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis that could help in the early identification of at-risk patients, are reviewed in the present study. Lifestyle changes (healthy diet, smoking cessation, maintaining a healthy weight and daily physical exercise) reduce the probability of a coronary event by up to 80% in the general population. Traditional therapeutic measures (dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus) and those specific to HIV infection (viral suppression, discontinuous treatment, etc.) are reviewed.

Patient-specific decision-making for warfarin therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: how will screening with genetics and imaging help?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for a majority of long-term morbidity and mortality associated with bleeding while on warfarin. Both ICH and warfarin-related ICH appear to have a genetic component. Furthermore, advanced neuroimaging using MRI can now identify individuals at increased risk of ICH. We explore whether screening strategies that include genetic profiling and neuroimaging might improve the safety of chronic anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation by identifying individuals from whom warfarin should be withheld. METHODS: We used a Markov state transition decision model. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years. Data sources included the English language literature using MEDLINE searches and bibliographies from selected articles along with empirical data from our institutions. The base case was a 69-year-old man with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: For patients at average risk for thromboembolic events and known to possess a hypothetical genetic profile increasing risk for warfarin ICH, anticoagulation remains the preferred strategy until the relative hazard of ICH exceeds 23.8. Genetic profiling would be favored for patients at low risk of thromboembolism (1.5% per year) if the hypothetical gene variant(s) conferred a relative risk of ICH >4.1. Screening strategies in which patients underwent genotyping and MRI before anticoagulation did not improve aggregate patient outcomes unless the predictive power of MRI exceeded current best guess estimates and patients were at low to moderate risk of thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Currently identified genetic markers of bleeding risk do not confer a risk of ICH sufficiently high to warrant routine genetic testing for patients at average risk of thromboembolism. Even if patients undergo screening with MRI as well as genotyping, currently available data on the role of MRI on risk of ICH and warfarin ICH do not support use of these tests for withholding anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

JAK2V617F mutation screening as part of the hypercoagulable work-up in the absence of splanchnic venous thrombosis or overt myeloproliferative neoplasm: assessment of value in a series of 664 consecutive patients.

The JAK2V617F mutation is recurrent in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, which are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) frequently associated with arterial and/or venous thromboembolism. More recently, the JAK2V617F mutation has been identified as a surrogate marker for subclinical or "occult" clonal myeloproliferation in patients with splanchnic venous thrombosis. However, information is limited regarding JAK2V617F-associated thrombosis outside the splanchnic district in patients without overt MPN. To address this issue, we retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 664 such patients who experienced thrombotic events characteristic of an MPN (500 with venous thromboembolism, 136 with stroke, and 28 with myocardial infarction at a young age). The JAK2V617F mutation was detected in only 6 (<1.0%) patients (5 with recurrent venous thromboembolism and 1 with stroke), and the mutant allele burden was low in all instances (range, 2.2%-7.5%). None of these 6 patients developed either overt MPN or recurrent thrombosis after a median follow-up of 40 months. We conclude that the prevalence of the JAK2V617F mutation in patients with nonsplanchnic venous thrombosis in the absence of MPN is too low to warrant mutation screening as part of the hypercoagulable work-up. Our study also suggests that the natural history of a JAK2V617F-positive "occult" MPN might be different from that of a typical MPN.

Risk factors for placental abruption in a socio-economically disadvantaged region.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken in order to determine the risk factors for pregnancies complicated by placental abruption in a socio-economically disadvantaged region in metropolitan Adelaide. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study including all singleton pregnancies resulting in placental abruption between 2001 and 2005. RESULTS: The overall incidence of placental abruption was 1.0%; the overall perinatal mortality among the births with abruption was 13%. Univariate analyses showed the following significant risk factors for placental abruption: preterm pre-labor rupture of the membranes (PRE-PROM; odds ratio (OR) 4.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-15.08), non-compliance with antenatal care (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.06-8.90), severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and elevated homocysteine levels (OR 45.55, 95% CI 7.05-458.93). Severe IUGR was significantly more common in the abruption group compared with the control group (p = 0.032). In the multivariate analysis, PRE-PROM remained a significant independent risk factor for placental abruption. Marijuana use, domestic violence, and mental health problems were more common (borderline significance) in the abruption group. Smoking and preeclampsia were not found to be associated with placental abruption in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In this high-risk population, PRE-PROM and elevated homocysteine levels appear to represent the major risk factors for placental abruption.

The John Charnley Award: heritable thrombophilia and development of thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: We retrospectively assessed whether heritable thrombophilia-hypofibrinolysis was more common in patients developing venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement than among control patients who did not develop venous thromboembolism, as an approach to better identify causes of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty. Twenty patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis after THA and 23 patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism were compared with 43 control patients who did not have postoperative venous thromboembolism. Five of 42 patients with venous thromboembolism (12%) and 0 of 43 control patients (0%) had antithrombin III deficiency (< 75%). Nine of 42 patients with venous thromboembolism (21%) and 2 of 43 control patients (4.7%) had protein C deficiency (< 70%). Ten of 43 patients with venous thromboembolism (9 heterozygous, 1 homozygous; 23%) and 1 of 43 control patients (heterozygous; 2%) had the prothrombin gene mutation. Patients who had venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty were more likely than matched control patients to have heritable thrombophilia with antithrombin III or protein C deficiency, or homo-heterozygosity for the prothrombin gene mutation. Screening for these three tests of heritable thrombophilia before total hip arthroplasty should improve the identification of patients with a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism who may need only mild thromboprophylaxis, and of those patients with heritable thrombophilia in whom prophylaxis should be more aggressive. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (lesser-quality RCT). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Thrombophilias in patients with ischemic stroke. Indication and calculated costs for evidence-based diagnostics and treatment]. / Thrombophilien bei Patienten mit ischämischem Schlaganfall. Indikation und Kostenermittlung einer evidenzbasierten Diagnostik und Therapie.

Patients with ischemic stroke are sometimes found to have an underlying inherited (deficiency of protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, activated protein C resistance, prothrombin gene mutation, hyperhomocysteinemia) or acquired thrombophilia (lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, hyperhomocysteinemia). Patient selection for thrombophilia screening is, therefore, a frequent question in managing patients with ischemic stroke. In this review we discuss patient selection and timing for laboratory tests for thrombophilia screening in stroke patients based on a literature review and we calculated overall costs per year in Germany for testing patients older than 18 years with an ischemic stroke of undetermined cause. As there is a lack of studies comparing anticoagulation with antiplatelet therapy in patients with diagnosed thrombophilia, laboratory screening for thrombophilia even in a selected group of patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke remains of questionable value at present. An exception appears to be testing for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies in younger patients with suspected antiphospholipid syndrome (two positive test results necessary), because anticoagulation seems to be superior to aspirin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.