Prothrombin time quality assessment scheme in the Basque Country.

The Basque Country Quality Assessment Scheme on Oral Anticoagulant Treatment (PEEC-CAV) was first launched in 1984. This project combined prothrombin time (PT) quality controls and a new in-house standard reagent called Thromboplastin Bilbao (TBi). Originally, this reagent was of human origin, but in 1994, it was replaced by one derived from rabbit brain following WHO recommendations. Nine hospitals in the area collaborated in carrying out quality controls (a) to assess different systems of PT test performance in the Basque Country and (b) to evaluate TBi response in these controls. Evaluation over the period 1994-1999 yielded an INR coefficient of variation (CV) for the plasmas used in these controls of 8.29+/-4.18% using the laboratories' routine system (reagent and coagulometer), and 9.7+/-2.70% using TBi and the manual technique. These results were similar to those obtained in the CV of PT ratio with human brain thromboplastin from 1984 to 1988 (9.26+/-2.84%).

Minimum numbers of fresh whole blood and plasma samples from patients and healthy subjects for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and RapidPointCoag monitors.

The international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of point-of-care-test (POCT) prothrombin time (PT) whole blood monitors is complex, requiring manual PT testing of 60 patients' and 20 healthy subjects' plasma samples. The possibility of reducing these numbers was studied by a Monte Carlo Bootstrap study for 2 POCT PT systems. For reduced sample numbers, this consisted of 50,000 calibrations using whole blood and plasma samples tested on the monitors with manual PT testing of plasma samples from the same blood donations. There was little effect on mean ISI by reduction of sample numbers to a total of 7, but there was progressively less certainty regarding the reliability of the calibration. Precision of the calibrations and international normalized ratio deviation were not affected markedly by reducing numbers to half As ISI calibration with the 2 POCT systems was less precise than conventional manual testing, for maximum confidence, reduction of numbers is not advised.

Anticoagulant therapy monitoring with international normalized ratio at US academic health centers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of incorporation of international normalized ratio (INR) reporting in US academic hospitals. DESIGN: Survey of academic hospital clinical laboratories in January 1995. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight academic hospital clinical laboratories at institutions that are members of the University Health System Consortium. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The methods for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy at the surveyed laboratories were determined. The extent of reporting of prothrombin time (PT), PT ratio, INR, and INR therapeutic range was determined. RESULTS: All 58 of the responding hospital clinical laboratories reported INR in patients receiving oral anticoagulation. The median length of time that hospitals had been reporting INR was 24 months (range 3-108). A majority of hospitals continued to report PT values (95%) and PT reference ranges (93%) in addition to INR. Therapeutic INR ranges were reported by only 25 of the laboratories (43%). Of those that report INR ranges, many follow the published recommendations by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Food and Drug Administration. A majority of the hospitals (79%) do not confirm the accuracy of the international sensitivity index (ISI) for their own analyzers. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous reports, academic hospital clinical laboratories have now adopted the more accurate system of reporting INR values in addition to PT values in patients receiving oral anticoagulation. However, better reporting of INR ranges, use of more sensitive thromboplastins, and confirmation of the accuracy of the ISI for local analyses would further improve the monitoring of oral anticoagulation.

Two recombinant tissue factor reagents compared to conventional thromboplastins for determination of international normalised ratio: a thirty-three-laboratory collaborative study. The Steering Committee of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation.

Recent advances in recombinant technology have led to the development of prothrombin time (PT) reagents containing recombinant tissue factor which has been lipidated to allow expression of procoagulant activity. In this study we have compared International Normalised Ratios (INRs) determined using two such reagents and conventional thromboplastins in widespread use in the UK. Lyophilised plasma samples from eight different warfarinised patients were distributed to 33 laboratories in the UK. Each participant determined prothrombin times on 20 local fresh normal plasmas (used to derive mean normal PT and calculate INR) and the eight lyophilised samples, using manual technique and the following thromboplastins; Recombiplastin (Ortho Diagnostics Ltd); Innovin (Baxter Diagnostics Ltd); the conventional thromboplastin in local use. For eight plasmas the mean INRs determined with different reagents were as follows: Innovin (33 laboratories) - 3.4; Manchester Reagent (MR = 8 laboratories) - 3.4; Recombiplastin (33 laboratories) - 3.7; Instrumentation Laboratory (IL = 13 laboratories) - 4.4. Mean INR results with Recombiplastin were on average 7% greater than those obtained with Innovin, 8% greater than results with MR and 18% less than INRs with IL thromboplastin. There was no significant difference between results obtained with Innovin and MR. In contrast INRs obtained with IL were markedly (mean 28%) greater than results obtained with Innovin. This study employed lyophilised plasma and it is possible that some of the relationships described are influenced by this. However, the lyophilisation process employed did not influence the relationship between INRs of warfarinised plasmas obtained by the four main reagents described, indicating that the results are relevant to routine clinical practice. In conclusion, our data show some important differences are present between INRs determined using Recombiplastin, Innovin and two conventional thromboplastins.

Assessment of therapeutic quality control in a long-term anticoagulant trial in post-myocardial infarction patients.

Various methods have been described to evaluate efficacy of anticoagulant therapy using the international normalized ratio (INR). We compared the following approaches: (1) total INR's or the most recent measurement; (2) percent time within therapeutic range, with INR changing directly or halfway between visits; and (3) total observation time assuming INR changing linearly. The study population comprised 1700 post myocardial infarction patients. Treatment comprised 3725 patient-years. There were 61,471 INR assessments with target therapeutic level of 2.8-4.8. Acenocoumarol as well as phenprocoumon were employed. Therapeutic achievement in the first months of treatment was low: less than 60% of INR's were in range. Treatment stabilized after 6 months. Patients on acenocoumarol were within range 70% of the time compared to 80% for phenprocoumon. Method 3 is preferred because it incorporates time and is capable of calculating incidence rates at different INR levels. Our findings call for an urgent improvement of standard of anticoagulant control in the first months following commencement of treatment.

Thromboplastin related differences in the determination of international normalised ratio: a cause for concern? Steering Committee of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Coagulation.

When the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is used for control of oral anticoagulant therapy the same result should be obtained irrespective of the laboratory reagent used. However, in the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation INRs determined using different reagents have been significantly different. For 18 NEQAS samples Manchester Reagent (MR) was associated with significantly lower INRs than those obtained using Diagen Activated (DA, p = 0.0004) or Instrumentation Laboratory PT-Fib HS (IL, p = 0.0001). Mean INRs for this group were 3.15, 3.61, and 3.65 for MR, DA, and IL respectively. For 61 fresh samples from warfarinised patients with INRs of greater than 3.0 the relationship between thromboplastins in respect of INR was similar to that observed for NEQAS data. Thus INRs obtained with MR were significantly lower than with DA or IL (p < 0.0001). Mean INRs for this group were 4.01, 4.40, and 4.59 for MR, DA, and IL respectively. We conclude that the differences between INRs measured with the thromboplastins studied here are sufficiently great to influence patient management through warfarin dosage schedules, particularly in the upper therapeutic range of INR. There is clearly a need to address the issues responsible for the observed discrepancies.

[Checking oral anticoagulation in capillary blood]. / Control de la anticoagulación oral en sangre capilar.

PURPOSE: To check out the reproducibility and costs of prothrombin time (PT) determination as a control of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in plasma and capillary blood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in two phases: along two years, 1,700 patients with OAT were controlled, 700 of them in the hospital outpatient clinic. In 149 patients INR was simultaneously determined in both capillary and venous blood. The 700 patients receiving acenocoumarin who had been controlled in 1991 according to the conventional plasma-sample fashion, were controlled in the second year (i.e., 1992) by means of capillary blood testing, a comparison of the costs of each method and the need for anticoagulant drugs being undertaken. Venous blood PT was assessed with reagent thromboplastin (Tromborel S) in an Electra-1000 (MLA) system. An automated Trombotrack system was used for the capillary blood tests using Thrombotest as current procedure. The results were expressed as INR in both methods. The statistical evaluation of the results was carried out by means of Student's t, variance analysis, and correlation study. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the anticoagulation intervals attained from venous or capillary blood samples. No significant differences were seen in 87 patients on whom the test was repeated in two samples drawn from a single capillary puncture. The weekly OAT doses of 30 patients along six months were analysed. The need for anticoagulant drugs was similar (17.4 vs 17.2 mg/patient/week). The mean INR in 1991 was 2.82 and the mean drug-need was 15.24 mg/week, whereas in 1992 the mean INR was 2.86 and the need for anticoagulant was 15.49 mg/week. The costs of the conventional method were 103.6 Pta, this being 70 Pta for capillary blood, which means a 32% savings. CONCLUSIONS: OAT control by means of PT performed on capillary blood must be considered a substitutive method for the venous blood assay due to its efficacy, simplicity and lower costs.

Effect of laboratory variation in the prothrombin-time ratio on the results of oral anticoagulant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy may be subject to unnecessary risks of bleeding or thromboembolism because of variability in the commercial thromboplastins used to determine prothrombin time and consequent uncertainty about the actual intensity of anticoagulation. METHODS: We explored the effect of this uncertainty on the benefits and risks of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves, using models of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications as a function of the intensity of anticoagulation, with quality-adjusted life expectancy and average variable costs used to describe outcomes. RESULTS: Anticoagulation provides a striking benefit for patients whose treatment is conducted within the recommended range of the international normalized ratio (INR)--i.e., 2.5 to 3.5--but if uncertainty about the laboratory results causes the intensity of anticoagulation to fall outside this range, the gain becomes smaller. Uncertainty about the true intensity of anticoagulation may reduce the potential gain in life expectancy, adjusted for quality of life, by more than half and may increase the ratio of costs to effectiveness to almost five times the optimal value. Variability in the intensity of anticoagulation is even greater if older recommendations advocating a higher level of anticoagulation are followed. CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty about the sensitivities of the commercially available thromboplastins used in the United States can have important clinical and economic effects. This problem could be eliminated if clinical laboratories uniformly reported the intensity of anticoagulation as the INR, by adjusting prothrombin-time ratios for variability in thromboplastins.

Assessment of different mathematical models for calculating and expressing the results of coagulation test procedures.

Coagulation activity, expressed as percentage of normal and as clotting time ratio, was estimated in 220 specimens from patients on long-term anticoagulant treatment by 3 different coagulation test procedures, i.e. Thrombotest, Simplastin-A and Normotest. The estimates were calculated from the same determinations. The distribution of percentage values showed a fairly pronounced deviation from normality. After logarithmic transformation, the distribution was normalized, the regression lines between Thrombotest and other tests became parallel, and that between PIVKA-insensitive systems was shifted to a 45 degree line. Logarithmic transformation also stabilized the residual variance. These features make percentage values accessible for treatment according to the standard methods of bioassay statistics. Attempts to normalize the distribution of ratio values by various transformations were unsuccessful. Formal analysis of data revealed a variation in the proportionality of ratio values with the level of estimated coagulation defect. This may restrict the usefulness of the ratio approach. Logarithmic transformation partly reduced the discrepancy.